Performance Assessments of an Advanced Control System in an Iron Ore Industrial Grinding Circuit
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Grinding
2.1. Grinding at Mineração Usiminas
2.2. Circuit Operation
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. BALL MILL ACETM
- i.
- The first is a fuzzy granulometry control module, designed to regulate the hydrocyclone overflow particle size, measured through laboratory analyses performed approximately every two hours. Because of this low-frequency measurement, fuzzy logic is used to interpret process behavior based on the granulometry error (difference between the target and measured value) and its rate of change. The controller then computes a bias that adjusts the hydrocyclone density setpoint—controlled by an MPC (HC density control)—gradually stabilizing the product size.
- ii.
- The second module focuses on throughput maximization under safe and stable conditions. It continuously assesses the circuit stability using key variables such as feed silo level, mill power, circulating load, sump CX-01 level, hydrocyclone density, and product granulometry. When all parameters remain within predefined limits for a minimum period of two hours, the module increases the MPC feed rate setpoint. After each adjustment, the stability assessment cycle restarts, allowing further incremental increases as long as operating conditions remain suitable. On the other hand, mill power draw, hydrocyclone feed density, and BP01/02 pump motor current are continuously monitored, and if any exceed their safety limits or indicate instability, the module automatically reduces the feed rate setpoint to maintain equipment integrity and circuit stability.
- iii.
- The third module supports grinding media management, maintaining mill power within the optimal operating range. It estimates the required media replenishment based on the historical media consumption per unit of energy and accumulated operating hours since the last replenishment. The module also evaluates recent mill power trends and adjusts the calculated media dosage when power deviates from the optimal range.
3.2. Performance Testing
3.3. Data Collection and Analysis
- The first filter, referred to as Base Filter, was applied to select the data from steady periods under nominal operating conditions. These periods were defined by a throughput of at least 450 tph sustained for 10 min and a hydrocyclone feed pulp density of at least 1.7 g/cm3 sustained for 30 min.
- The second filter, referred to as 3STD, was essentially a steadiness criterion, adopted as the variation of three standard deviations around the mean to eliminate outliers, without compromising the representativeness of stable periods. The sampling interval adopted was 20 s per collection point.
- DB_Geral: Dataset of the entire 28-day period.
- DBCX1_OK: Dataset of the 9 days in which the level restriction of CX-01 acted on less than 35% of the daily operational time.
- DBCX1_NOK: Dataset of the 19 days in which the level restriction of CX-01 acted on more than 35% of the daily operational time.
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Circuit Throughput
4.2. Hydrocyclone Feed Pulp Density
4.3. Grinding Size
4.4. Size-Specific Energy Consumption
5. Summary
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ACE | ANDRITZ Control Expert |
| AI | Artificial Intelligence |
| AG | Autogenous Grinding |
| APC | Advanced Process Control |
| IIoT | Industrial Internet of Things |
| IoT | Internet of Things |
| ITM | Industrial Mineral Processing Plants |
| MPC | Model Predictive Control (or Controller, depending on context) |
| MUSA | Mineração Usiminas |
| ON/OFF | Enabled/Disabled mode |
| PID | Proportional–Integral–Derivative (control strategy) |
| P80 | 80% of the material passing a specific size (0.106 mm in this study) |
| SAG | Semi-Autogenous Grinding |
| 3STD | Three Standard Deviations (steadiness criterion) |
References
- Moya, M.; Martínez-Gómez, J.; Carabajo, C.; Toapanta, A.; Cruz, C. Energy Efficiency and Carbon Footprint Assessment in Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining Processing Plants in Ecuador. Environ. Geochem. Health 2025, 47, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, W.; Xu, J.; Cao, L.; Li, F. Towards Iron Ore Mining Sustainability and Low-Carbon Transformation: Policies and Implications. Resour. Policy 2024, 90, 104780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, G.; Zhou, J.; Song, T.; Yang, J.; Li, K. Hierarchical Intelligent Control Method for Mineral Particle Size Based on Machine Learning. Minerals 2023, 13, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Vásquez, R.; García-Martínez, M.J.; Bolonio, D. Investigation of Gold Recovery and Mercury Losses in Whole Ore Amalgamation: Artisanal Gold Mining in Nambija, Ecuador. Minerals 2023, 13, 1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grbeš, A.; Dokoza, V.; Lukač, G.; Bilić, Š. Potential for Restoration of Biodiversity in Karstic Mining Regions with Small-Scale Mining Sites: Birds and Pits. Euro-Mediterr. J. Environ. Integr. 2024, 9, 921–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, H.; Xiao, D.; Mao, Z. Exploration of Grade Distribution in Iron Mines Based on Rough Set Extreme Learning Machine and Multispectral Data. Expert Syst. Appl. 2025, 265, 125938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hodouin, D.; Jämsä-Jounela, S.L.; Carvalho, M.; Bergh, L. State of the Art and Challenges in Mineral Processing Control. Control Eng. Pract. 2001, 9, 995–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Najafabadipour, A.; Hassanzadeh, F.; Kordestani, M. Advanced Deep Learning Models for Predicting Elemental Concentrations in Iron Ore Mines Using XRF Data: A Cost-Effective Alternative to ICP-MS Methods. Environ. Geochem. Health 2025, 47, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bulayani, M.; Raghupatruni, P.; Mamvura, T.; Danha, G. Exploring Low-Grade Iron Ore Beneficiation Techniques: A Comprehensive Review. Minerals 2024, 14, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Curry, J.A.; Ismay, M.J.L.; Jameson, G.J. Mine Operating Costs and the Potential Impacts of Energy and Grinding. Miner. Eng. 2014, 56, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Díaz Álvarez, J.S.; López Jara, I.Y. Determination of Energy Consumption According to the Phases of the Mineral Comminution Process. J. Energy Environ. Sci. 2024, 8, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loudari, C.; Cherkaoui, M.; El Harraki, I.; Bennani, R.; El Adnani, M.; Abdelwahed, E.H.; Benzakour, I.; Bourzeix, F.; Baina, K. Improving Energy Efficiency in the Mining Industry: An LSTM-ANN Predictive Model for Sieve Refusal in Grinding Mills. Int. J. Min. Geo-Eng. 2025, 59, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-García, E.M.; Bouchard, J.; Poulin, É. Integration of a Liberation Model in a Simulation Framework for Comminution Circuits. Miner. Eng. 2018, 126, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sosa-Blanco, C.; Hodouin, D.; Bazin, C.; Lara-Valenzuela, C.; Salazar, J. Economic Optimisation of a Flotation Plant Through Grinding Circuit Tuning. Miner. Eng. 2000, 13, 999–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, C.; Lai, J.; Liao, N.; Sheng, H.; Chen, Z.; Xu, D.; Wang, G.; Wu, J. Energy Saving and Grinding Circuit Optimization in Tungsten Ore Processing Plant through High-Pressure Grinding Rolls and One-Stage Grinding Design: An Industrial Case Study. Miner. Eng. 2025, 227, 109276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Liu, L.; Duan, L.; Liao, Q. Multi-Objective Optimization for an Industrial Grinding and Classification Process Based on PBM and RSM. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 2023, 10, 2124–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bauer, M.; Craig, I.K. Economic Assessment of Advanced Process Control—A Survey and Framework. J. Process Control 2008, 18, 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le Roux, J.D.; Craig, I.K. Plant-Wide Control Framework for a Grinding Mill Circuit. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 11585–11599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Apelt, T.A.; Thornhill, N.F. Inferential Measurement of SAG Mill Parameters V: MPC Simulation. Miner. Eng. 2009, 22, 1045–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Remes, A.; Aaltonen, J.; Koivo, H. Grinding Circuit Modeling and Simulation of Particle Size Control at Siilinjärvi Concentrator. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2010, 96, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Li, S.; Chen, X.; Li, Q. Disturbance Rejection of Ball Mill Grinding Circuits Using DOB and MPC. Powder Technol. 2010, 198, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steyn, C.W.; Sandrock, C. Benefits of Optimisation and Model Predictive Control on a Fully Autogenous Mill with Variable Speed. Miner. Eng. 2013, 53, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le Roux, J.D.; Steyn, C.W. Validation of a Dynamic Non-Linear Grinding Circuit Model for Process Control. Miner. Eng. 2022, 187, 107780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopes, E.d.J.; dos Santos, G.G.; Alexandre, A.R.A. Operational Factors Influencing Quality Control in Ore Milling: A Systematic Review. J. Eng. Technol. Ind. Appl. 2025, 11, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, X.; Fan, X.; Li, Z.; Chen, X.; Peng, Z.; Gan, M.; Ji, Z.; Sun, Z. An Integrated Optimal Control Model for the Drying and Preheating Process in Iron Ore Pellet Manufacturing. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2024, 51, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cacciuttolo, C.; Guzmán, V.; Catriñir, P.; Atencio, E.; Komarizadehasl, S.; Lozano-Galant, J.A. Low-Cost Sensor Technologies for Monitoring Sustainability and Safety Issues in Mining Activities: Advances, Gaps, and Future Directions in the Digitalization for Smart Mining. Sensors 2023, 23, 6846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhironkina, O.; Zhironkin, S. Technological and Intellectual Transition to Mining 4.0: A Review. Energies 2023, 16, 1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kadel, N., Jr.; da Silva, J.F.; Ghobakhloo, M.; Ritter, A.M.; da Silva, D.O.; Sellitto, M.A. Industry 4.0 Technologies and Sustainability Challenges: A Case Study in the Coal Mining Industry. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manag. 2022, 14, 186–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelly, E.C.; Spottiswood, D.J. Introduction to Mineral Processing, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1982; 492p. [Google Scholar]
- Luz, A.B.d.; Sampaio, J.A.; França, S.C.A. (Eds.) Tratamento de Minérios, 5th ed.; CETEM/MCT: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2010; pp. 465–512. [Google Scholar]
- Jämsä-Jounela, S.L. Future Automation Systems in Context of Process Systems and Minerals Engineering. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2019, 52, 403–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ballantyne, G.R.; Powell, M.S.; Tiang, M. Proportion of Energy Attributable to Comminution. In Proceedings of the 11th Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Mill Operators’ Conference, Tasmania, Australia, 29–31 October 2012; pp. 25–30. [Google Scholar]
- Morrell, S. Presentation: A Global and Mining Industry Perspective of the Role of Comminution in the 1.5 °C Future. In Proceedings of the 2023 SME Annual Conference & Expo, Denver, CO, USA, 26 February–1 March 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Hulbert, D.G. Multivariable Control of a Wet Grinding Circuit. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Natal, Durban, South Africa, 1977. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y.; Lian, X.; Li, Z.; Zheng, S.; Wang, Z. Effects of Rotation Speed and Media Density on Particle Size Distribution and Structure of Ground Calcium Carbonate in a Planetary Ball Mill. Adv. Powder Technol. 2015, 26, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.; Xiao, Q.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, X.; Jin, S.; Pei, Y.; Shen, C. An Innovatory Approach for Determining Grinding Media System to Optimize Fraction Compositions of Grinding Products Based on Grinding Dynamics Principle. Powder Technol. 2024, 434, 119302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, P.; Lu, S.; Yuan, M.; Chai, T. Survey on Higher-Level Advanced Control for Grinding Circuits Operation. Powder Technol. 2016, 288, 324–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamashita, A.S.; Martins, W.T.; Pinto, T.V.B.; Raffo, G.V.; Euzébio, T.A.M. Multiobjective Tuning Technique for MPC in Grinding Circuits. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 43041–43054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Usiminas. Mineração Usiminas. 2024. Available online: https://www.usiminas.com/pages/mineracao-usiminas/ (accessed on 1 October 2025).
- Alves, F. Brasil Mineral—As Maiores Empresas do Setor Mineral. Ed Especial n°441. Jul; 48–58. Available online: https://www.brasilmineral.com.br/revista/441/ (accessed on 1 October 2025).
- Zervos, C.C.; Dumont, G.A. Deterministic adaptive control based on Laguerre series representation. Int. J. Control 1988, 48, 2333–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shapiro, S.S.; Wilk, M.B. An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples). Biometrika 1965, 52, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKnight, P.E.; Najab, J. Mann–Whitney U Test. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology, 4th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
- Levene, H. Robust Tests for Equality of Variances. Contrib. Probab. Stat. 1960, 1, 278–292. [Google Scholar]






| Main Characteristics of the Feed Material | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Chemical | Physical | ||
| Fe Grade | SiO2 Grade | Density of Solids | WI |
| 45.2% | 31.0% | 3.9 g/cm3 | 14.6 kWh/t |
| Control Layer | Controlled Variable | Objective | Manipulated Variable | Controller |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restriction | CX-01 level | Avoid overflow and emptying of CX-01 | Water addition to CX-01 | MPC BrainWave® |
| CX-02 level | Avoid overflow of CX-02 | Rotating speed of BP01 or BP02 | MPC BrainWave® | |
| Hydrocyclone feed pressure | Ensure pressure within stipulated operating interval | Rotating speed of BP01 or BP02 | MPC BrainWave® | |
| BP-01 and 02 electric current | Avoid damage to the electric motors | Rotating speed of BP01 or BP02 | MPC BrainWave® | |
| Main | Circuit throughput | Keep the throughput steady | Feeder speed | MPC BrainWave® |
| Solids concentration in the mill | Keep the concentration in the setpoint | Water addition to the mill | Cascade of the MPC BrainWave® and PID | |
| Feed pulp density to hydrocyclones | Keep density steady | Water flowrate and water addition valve to CX-01 | Cascade of MPC BrainWave® Hydrocyclone feed density and CX-01 water addition flowrate | |
| CX-01 level | Keep the level within the stipulated operating interval | Rotating speed of BP01 or BP02 | MPC BrainWave® | |
| Supervision and Optimization | Product size distribution | Adjust the hydrocyclone cutting size | Bias of the density setpoint | Fuzzy Metris All-in-one Platform™ |
| Circuit throughput | Maximize throughput | Circuit feed setpoint | Expert IDEAS and Fuzzy Metris All-in-one Platform™ | |
| Mill power draw | Keep the power draw within the stipulated operating interval | Amount of grinding media added to the mill | Expert IDEAS and Fuzzy Metris All-in-one Platform™ |
| Criterion | Number of Data | |
|---|---|---|
| Period OFF | Period ON | |
| Not filtered | 11,219,208 | 11,399,024 |
| Only Base Filter | 9,563,736 | 10,782,863 |
| Both Base Filter and 3STD Filter | 8,971,053 | 10,326,316 |
| Percent Base Filter and 3STD Filter | 79.96% | 90.59% |
| Scenario | Circuit Throughput (tph) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Average | Observation | ||
| (tph) | (%) | ||
| APC OFF | 541.2 | Reference | |
| APC ON—DB_Geral | 553.7 | +2.3 | APC ON vs. APC OFF |
| APC ON—DBCX1_OK | 571.7 | +5.6 | APC ON (Hatched areas) vs. APC OFF |
| APC ON—DBCX1_NOK | 545.1 | +0.7 | APC ON (No hatched areas) vs. APC OFF |
| Parameter | APC OFF | APC ON | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DB_Geral | DB_CX1_OK | DB_CX1_NOK | ||||||
| Δ% | p-Value | Δ% | Δ% | |||||
| Circuit throughput (t/h) | 541.2 | 553.7 | +2.3 | 0.0447 | 571.7 | +5.6 | 545.1 | +0.7 |
| Hydrocyclones feed pulp density (g/cm3) | 0.046 | 0.034 | −26 | 0 | 0.017 | −63 | 0.035 | −24 |
| Retained at 0.150 mm (%) | 1.67 | 1.80 | +7.78 | 2.03 | +20.83 | 1.58 | −5.38 | |
| Size-specific energy consumption (kWh/t) | 12.45 | 12.17 | −2.24 | 11.82 | −5.06 | 12.33 | −0.96 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Costa, P.K.; Vaz, P.N.; Calixto, M.F.; Torga, D.S.; Bergerman, M.G.; Delboni, H., Jr. Performance Assessments of an Advanced Control System in an Iron Ore Industrial Grinding Circuit. Minerals 2025, 15, 1172. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15111172
Costa PK, Vaz PN, Calixto MF, Torga DS, Bergerman MG, Delboni H Jr. Performance Assessments of an Advanced Control System in an Iron Ore Industrial Grinding Circuit. Minerals. 2025; 15(11):1172. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15111172
Chicago/Turabian StyleCosta, Pamela Karem, Patricia Nogueira Vaz, Marcelo Ferreira Calixto, Diego Santana Torga, Mauricio Guimaraes Bergerman, and Homero Delboni, Jr. 2025. "Performance Assessments of an Advanced Control System in an Iron Ore Industrial Grinding Circuit" Minerals 15, no. 11: 1172. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15111172
APA StyleCosta, P. K., Vaz, P. N., Calixto, M. F., Torga, D. S., Bergerman, M. G., & Delboni, H., Jr. (2025). Performance Assessments of an Advanced Control System in an Iron Ore Industrial Grinding Circuit. Minerals, 15(11), 1172. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15111172

