Next Article in Journal
Improving the Efficiency of Downhole Uranium Production Using Oxygen as an Oxidizer
Next Article in Special Issue
Genesis of the Dongpuzi Gold Deposit in the Liaodong Peninsula, NE China: Constraints from Geology, Fluid Inclusion, and C–H–O–S–Pb Isotopes
Previous Article in Journal
Desorption of REEs from Halloysite and Illite: A Link to the Exploitation of Ion-Adsorption RE Ore Based on Clay Species
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ore Genesis of the Dongping Gold Deposit in the Northern Margin of North China Craton: Constraints from In-Situ Major, Trace Elemental Analysis of Magnetite and Pyrite
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Early Cretaceous Granitoids and Microgranular Mafic Enclaves of Sanguliu Pluton, the Liaodong Peninsula: Implications for Magma Mixing and Decratonic Gold Mineralization in the Eastern North China Craton

Minerals 2022, 12(8), 1004; https://doi.org/10.3390/min12081004
by Taotao Wu, Cong Chen *, Dongtao Li, Yan Zhao, Chunqiang Zhao and Yongheng Zhou
Minerals 2022, 12(8), 1004; https://doi.org/10.3390/min12081004
Submission received: 5 July 2022 / Revised: 30 July 2022 / Accepted: 5 August 2022 / Published: 9 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genesis and Metallogeny of Non-ferrous and Precious Metal Deposits)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript deals with the very interesting subject of magmatic rock formation and correlation to Au deposits.

The manuscript is well written, the methodology is well described and the results are well presented.

The authors should state why they chose two different methods for U-Pb dating in zircons (LA-ICP-MS for granodiorite zircons) and (SHRIMP for monzodioritic enclaves).

For more details on the review (and the corresponding comments) please see the attached revised version of the manuscript.

Congratulations for your work!

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors

I positively have enjoyed and benefited from reading this attractive monograph.

However, I have attached annotated pdf containing some comments (mainly language polishing).

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors

Thanks for your response to my comments and corrections.

Back to TopTop