Next Article in Journal
Sintering Properties and Regression Analysis of Imported Iron Ore Powder
Next Article in Special Issue
Organophilic Synthetic Stevensite-Zn: Synthesis and Characterization, an Alternative Simple Method
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Fuzzy and Neural Network Computing Techniques for Performance Prediction of an Industrial Copper Flotation Circuit
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Minerals
Volume 12
Issue 12
10.3390/min12121495
minerals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

State-of-the-Art Nanoclay Reinforcement in Green Polymeric Nanocomposite: From Design to New Opportunities

by
Ayesha Kausar
1,2,3,*,
Ishaq Ahmad
2,4,
Malik Maaza
2 and
M.H. Eisa
5
1
NPU-NCP Joint International Research Center on Advanced Nanomaterials and Defects Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
2
UNESCO-UNISA Africa Chair in Nanosciences/Nanotechnology, iThemba LABS, Somerset West 7129, South Africa
3
National Centre for Physics, Quaid-i-Azam University Campus, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
4
NPU-NCP Joint International Research Center on Advanced Nanomaterials and Defects Engineering, National Centre for Physics, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
5
Department of Physics, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 13318, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2022, 12(12), 1495; https://doi.org/10.3390/min12121495
Submission received: 3 November 2022 / Revised: 19 November 2022 / Accepted: 21 November 2022 / Published: 23 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Obtainment, Characterization, and Applications of Organophilic Clays)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nanoclays are layered aluminosilicate nanostructures. Depending upon the chemical composition and microscopic structure, various nanoclay types have been discovered such as montmorillonite, bentonite, kaolinite, halloysite nanoclay, etc. Nanoclays have been organically modified to develop compatibility with polymers. Polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites have prompted significant breakthroughs in the field of nanocomposite technology. Green nanocomposites form an important class of nanomaterials using naturally derived degradable materials as matrix/nanofiller. This review essentially deliberates the fundamentals and effect of nanoclay reinforcements in the green polymer matrices. Naturally derived polymers such as cellulose, starch, natural rubber, poly(lactic acid), etc. have been employed in these nanocomposites. Green polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites have been fabricated using various feasible fabrication approaches such as the solution route, melt processing, in situ polymerization, and others. The significance of the structure-property relationships in these nanomaterials, essential to attain the desired features, has been presented. Green polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites are light weight, inexpensiveness, ecofriendly, have a low cost, and enhanced indispensable physical properties. Consequently, the green polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites have found applications towards sustainability uses, packaging, membranes, and biomedical (tissue engineering, drug delivery, wound healing) sectors. However, thorough research efforts are desirable to extend the utility of the green polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites in future technological sectors.

1. Introduction

Nanoclays are important layered aluminosilicates [1,2,3]. The platelet size usually ranges from 10 nm to 100 nm. Nanoclays occur naturally; however, can be formed through synthetic routes. In nanoclays, the individual nanolayers are made up of SiO44− tetrahedra or [AlO3(OH)3]6 octahedra. The aluminosilicate-layered nanosheets are often stacked together via van der Waals forces. The layered nanosheets have entrapped ions between the platelets. The nanoclay-based nanostructures show notable structural, morphological, thermal, mechanical, and barrier properties. Owing to their unique nano-scale structure, the nanoclays have been used as excellent nanofillers in polymeric matrices to form the nanomaterials [4,5]. To progress the compatibility of the nanoclays (inorganic) with the polymers (organic), the layered silicates are usually modified via alkyl cations to form the organoclays [6]. The polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites own the mechanical robustness, heat stability, and flame resistance characteristics. Consequently, these nanocomposites have been applied in wide-ranging industrial applications including the aerospace, automotive, construction, packaging, electronics, etc. Ecofriendly and biodegradable polymers and nanoclays combinations have been recognized to develop the green nanocomposites [7]. Thus, the remarkable green polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites have been designed using the naturally derived polymers [8,9]. Subsequently, the green polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites have been explored in numerous sustainable materials and applied sectors [10,11,12]. Consequently, the polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites have been designed using several facile intercalation and exfoliation routes [13]. The nanoclay nanofillers including montmorillonite, cloisite, laptonite, sepiolite, halloysite nanotube, etc. have been filled in cellulose [14,15,16], starch or polysaccharides [17,18,19], poly(lactic acid) [20,21,22], silk [23,24], natural rubber [25,26,27], and other matrices. The green polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites have superior physicochemical, biocompatibility, and hydrophilicity properties. The versatile applications of green polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites have been observed in the fields of drug delivery, tissue engineering, packaging, and strength applications [28,29].
This review states the fundamentals, design, essential features, and potential applications of green polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites. The advanced developments and solicitations of the high-performance green polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites have rendered these materials important for future advancements in the related industries. Thus, this is an all-inclusive, pioneering, and up-to-date overview on green polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites portraying indispensable aspects from synthesis/essential features to technical potentials. To the best of our knowledge, green polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites have not been assessed comprehensively in the literature before with such specific review outline, recent literature reports, and technical analysis. Therefore, this review article is undoubtedly a ground-breaking contribution in the field of green nanomaterials aiming at advanced industrial applications. Subsequently, forthcoming evolutions in the field of green polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites are not conceivable for researchers before obtaining prior knowledge of the accumulated literature and investigations regarding these nanomaterials.

2. Nanoclay

In the nanocomposite field, research has focused on the use of inorganic or organic nanofillers for polymeric matrices [30]. Nanoclay was discovered as a unique inorganic nanofiller for the hybrid polymer nanocomposite [31]. Out of a large class of hydrous aluminum phyllosilicate minerals, commonly used nanoclays include montmorillonite, bentonite, kaolinite, mica, and many others [32]. The typical structure of a nanoclay consist of two-dimensional silica tetrahedral nanosheets attached to the alumina octahedral nanosheets (Figure 1). In nanoclays, a layered silicate sheet has a thickness of ~0.7 nm, whereas the double layer has a thickness of ~1 nm. The interlayer spacing between the nanoclay platelets has quite weak van der Waals interactions [33]. The layered silicates are hydrophilic in nature, so the interaction of the nanoclay with the polymer chains is generally difficult [34]. Therefore, to improve the organophillicity of nanoclays, the interlayer spacing is usually modified through exchangeable ions, organic molecules, or surfactants (Figure 2). As the nanoclay nanosheet surface is negatively charged due to the inbuilt silicate structure, the interlayer spacing can easily compensate an exchangeable cation layer (Na+, K+, Mg2+, and Ca2+, etc.). Accordingly, the charge exchange capacity of the layered silicates has been studied [35]. Due to surface charge on the layered silicate nanosheets, the nanoclays have shown an electrical conductivity of 25–100 mSm−1 [36,37]. The structure of nanoclay can be well interpreted on the basis of differences and relative advantageous properties, compared with aluminum silicate, i.e., derived from aluminum oxide and silicon dioxide (Table 1). In nanoclays, the substitution of organic cations (aliphatic chain attached to -NH3+) between the nanoclay galleries can increase the interlayer spacing for better compatibility with the polymeric chains [38,39]. Synthetic polymers such as epoxy, polystyrene, polyamide, polyurethane, etc., have been used as matrices for nanoclay nanofillers [40]. The ensuing polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites have high tensile, non-flammability, thermal, electrical, and barrier properties [41,42,43].

3. Polymer/Nanoclay Nanocomposite

The nanoclay nanofillers have been reinforced in the polymeric matrices through various physical and chemical approaches [45]. However, developing fine interactions between the matrix and clay nanosheets have been found challenging to achieve a compatible polymer/nanoclay nanostructure [46]. In this regard, the interlayer spacing between the nanoclay platelets was improved through the intercalation of surfactant/functional molecules. Consequently, cationic or anionic nanoclay modification processes have been used [13,47]. Figure 3 demonstrates the intercalation of polymer chains between the nanoclay galleries and subsequent dispersibility to form the tactoids, intercalated, or exfoliated structures. For comparison purposes, a polypropylene matrix has been studied with different types of nanoclays to see the intercalation or exfoliation effects (Table 2). Depending upon the nanoclay type, intercalation or exfoliation was facilitated by the melt-blended polypropylene nanocomposites.
Various facile methods have been adopted to form the polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites [48]. The most commonly adopted techniques involve the solution mixing (nanoclay and polymer dispersion in solvent), melt mixing (polymer/nanoclay direct melting and mixing at high temperature), and in situ polymerization (in situ monomer and nanoclay interaction) [49,50]. In these approaches, homogeneous nanoclay dispersion in the polymer matrices has been investigated.
Table
Table 2. Polypropylene/nanoclay nanocomposite prepared by melt blending method.
Table 2. Polypropylene/nanoclay nanocomposite prepared by melt blending method.
PolymerNanoclayPolymer/Nanoclay StructureRef
PolypropyleneMontmorilloniteExfoliated and intercalated[51,52]
PolypropyleneKaoliniteIntercalated[53,54]
PolypropyleneCloisiteExfoliated[55,56]
PolypropyleneVinyl clayExfoliated[57]
PolypropyleneSepioliteExfoliated or intercalated[58,59]
Table 3 depicts a brief recent survey on some high-performance synthetic polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites. The polymeric matrices such as polystyrene [60,61,62], polyethylene [63,64,65,66], polypropylene [67,68,69], polyamide [70,71,72], poly(methyl methacrylate) [73,74,75,76], polyaniline [77,78], polypyrrole [79], etc., have been reinforced with nanoclays such as montmorillonite, bentonite, halloysite nanoclay, kaolinite, cloisite, and several other minerals. The inclusion of nanoclays in polymeric matrices was found to enhance the heat stability, flame defiance, mechanical properties (tensile strength, tensile modulus, toughness, etc.), barrier properties, and self-healing features of the nanocomposites. Wide ranging applications of the polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites have been observed from automotives/construction to electronics to biomedical areas [80,81,82].

4. Green Polymer/Nanoclay Nanocomposite

Green polymers (natural or synthetic) such as cellulose, starch, polycarbonate, poly(lactic acid), etc., have gained research interest for the development of ecological nanocomposites [83]. Green synthesis procedures have also been adopted to form ecopolymers and green nanocomposites [84,85]. Green polymers and nanomaterials have been applied in coatings [86], membranes [87], adhesives [88], drug delivery [89], and other biomedical applications [90,91]. In these nanocomposites, green nanofillers have been utilized with polymers to attain the desired biodegradability. Chitosan is usually employed as both a green matrix and a nanofiller [92,93]. Similarly, lignin has been used as a green nanofiller as well as a matrix [94,95]. Green nanofillers have been reinforced in numerous natural and synthetic polymers such as poly(lactic acid), poly(ethylene oxide), poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(lactic acid), and many others [96,97]. Nanoclays have been identified as important green nanofillers for polymeric matrices [98,99]. Among nanoclays, montmorillonite is a well-known ecological nanofiller [100,101,102]. Nanoclays, along with the degradable natural/synthetic polymers, have been effectively used to develop the green systems [103,104]. In green polymeric nanocomposites, carbon nanofillers such as graphene, graphene oxide, and carbon nanotube have also been reinforced [105,106,107]. The degradable green polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites have fine biodegradability, and antimicrobial effects, and thermal, mechanical, and electrical characteristics. A few general relative properties and applications of green polymeric nanocomposites with different nanoclays are given in Table 4.

4.1. Cellulose/Nanoclay Nanocomposite

Cellulose has been obtained by chemical or enzymatic treatment of raw cellulose sources [108,109]. Cellulose is a natural degradable polymer; however, it has limitations of water vapor permeability and hydrophilicity [108]. Consequently, nanocomposites of cellulose with montmorillonite, kaolinite, and other nanoclays have been reported [110]. The cellulose-based nanocomposites have fine dispersion, mechanical robustness, gas barrier, and flame retardance characteristics [111]. The compatibility between the matrix and nanofiller in the nanocomposite has been analyzed. Barbi et al. [112] designed the bacterial cellulose and ceramic nanoclay-based green nanocomposites. The hydrophilic porous membranes were obtained having fine biomedical potential. Ming et al. [113] designed the green nanocomposite based on the nanofibrillated cellulose and montmorillonite nanoclay. The synthesis, transparency, and flame retardancy of the nanocomposites were investigated. Figure 4 shows the synthesis of nanofibrillated cellulose/nanoclay involving the formation of polymer suspension and nanoclay dispersion. The nanocomposites were fabricated through mechanical stirring and ultra-sonication approaches. Figure 5 displays the sample burning of neat nanofibrillated cellulose film and nanocomposite film with 50 wt.% clay nanoplatelet.
The neat nanofibrillated cellulose film showed an extensive burning for 8 s, and smoldering continues for 32 s. However, the nanocomposite sample was not vigorously burnt and revealed self-extinguishing behavior. The nanofibrillated cellulose/nanoclay films have high transparency (≥90) and superb self-extinguishing behavior, due to the effect of nanoclay nanofiller. Ferfera-Harrar et al. [114] developed green nanocomposites based on various types of organo-modified montmorillonite such as gelatin-modified montmorillonite or chitosan-modified montmorillonite. Triethyl citrate was used as an eco-plasticizer. In microscopic studies, the plasticized nanocomposites displayed well intercalated and exfoliated structure. The 5 wt.% nanoclay content was found to be the optimum to increase the thermal stability of the nanocomposite. In addition to the thermal and flame resistance features, the cellulose/nanoclay nanocomposites have been used for electronic applications [115]. Cellulose paper was filled with nanoclay nanofiller to develop flexible and green electronics [116]. A cellulose matrix with 34 wt.% nanoclay content had improved the young’s modulus by 1.5 times compared to the neat cellulose. Moreover, the thermal stability of the cellulose/nanoclay nanocomposite paper was improved from 290 (neat cellulose) to 310 °C. The cellulose/nanoclay nanocomposite paper revealed flexible and easy-to-process electronics, as compared to the conventional rigid circuits.

4.2. Starch/Nanoclay Nanocomposite

Starch belongs to the polysaccharide group having low cost, biodegradability, potential availability, and attractive physical properties [117]. Starch is commonly found in wheat, rice, corn, potato, etc. The structure of starch has intense intermolecular hydrogen bonding between its chains, which may affect its solubility [118]. Starch has important applications in packaging, drug delivery, and tissue engineering [119]. Green nanocomposites have been designed using a starch matrix and nanoclay nanofiller via a solvent casting method [120]. Pristine starch usually has poor mechanical properties. In this regard, plasticizers have been used to improve the physical features of starch. Plasticizers are usually low molecular weight compounds, which are added to improve the flexibility and processibility of the starch-based materials [121,122]. Mansour et al. [123] prepared the nanocomposite derived from non-granular maize starch and sodium montmorillonite nanoclay. The nanocomposite was plasticized with the glycerol plasticizer. The addition of 10–20 wt.% nanoclay content and 20 wt.% glycerol plasticizer improved the mechanical properties of the nanocomposite. The effect of the plasticizer was observed in fine processing and dispersion of the nanocomposites. Pandey et al. [124] fabricated starch/nanoclay nanocomposites. The glycerol particles were suggested to act as the plasticizer. Starch plasticization improved the polymer chain mobility and diffusion into the nanoclay galleries. In effect, the thermal and mechanical properties were enhanced. Almasi and co-workers [125] designed the green nanocomposites based on the citric acid modified starch matrix and montmorillonite nanoclay nanofiller. Inclusion of 7 wt.% nanoclay improved the ultimate tensile strength of the nanocomposite by threefold, compared with the neat citric acid modified starch. Accordingly, starch-based green nanocomposites have been mostly developed using the modified nanoclays and plasticizers. The use of additional low molecular weight particles and functional nanofiller has been considered essential to support the homogeneous nanocomposite formation with superior physical properties.
Alginate is an anionic polysaccharide found in brown algae, which can be easily cross-linked through ionic crosslinks between the carboxylic acid moieties and divalent cations such as Ca2+, Sr2+, Zn2+, or Ba2+ [126,127]. This green polymer has also been filled with nanoclay nanofillers to form nanocomposites. Consequently, the alginate polymer was filled with laponite nanoclay to form three-dimensional printing ink [128]. The nanocomposite was found to be useful for drug delivery applications. The 3D printed architectures of alginate/nanoclay nanocomposites have also been designed [129]. The nanocomposite was found to be useful for the removal of toxic metal ions from water. Furthermore, a halloysite nanotube [130] (a form of nanoclay) has also been used to form the nanocomposite with starch or polysaccharide matrices. The halloysite nanotube is a unique type of one dimensional nanofiller. The biodegradable polysaccharides have weak stability in processing, poor barrier properties, and high susceptibility to environmental variations. The inclusion of a halloysite nanotube in biodegradable polysaccharides has been found to improve the mechanical properties, and decreased the permeability to water vapor/oxygen, lowered water solubility and water adsorption capacity, and so renders a potential for food packaging application. Functionalized halloysite nanotube such as polydopamine-coated halloysite nanotube can be a good option for improving the mechanical and physical properties of biopolymer films and composites [126,131]. Makaremi et al. [132] designed pectin a heteropolysaccharide/halloysite nanotube for food packaging applications. The inclusion of a halloysite nanotube in a pectin heteropolysaccharide matrix produced antimicrobial activity in nanocomposite films towards the Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains. Hence, the nanocomposites were found to be useful for food packing material. Bertolino et al. [133] produced a polysaccharide/halloysite nanotube aimed at drug delivery applications. For this purpose, the solvent casting, lyophilization, and cryoscopic methods have been used. The physiochemical, morphological, and mesoscopic properties have been investigated targeting drug transport applications.

4.3. Poly(Lactic Acid)/Nanoclay Nanocomposite

Poly(lactic acid) has been employed as an important biodegradable green matrix for nanoclays [134,135]. Darie et al. [136] prepared poly(lactic acid)/Cloisite nanoclay nanocomposite through solution intercalation methods. The nanocomposites were tested and verified for antimicrobial activity versus Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains. Grigora et al. [137] proposed a poly(lactic acid)/montmorillonite nanoclay nanocomposites via the solution method. The inclusion of 1–4 wt.% nanoclay enhanced the hydrophilicity of the nanocomposites due to the intrinsic hydrophilic nature of reinforced nanofiller. Bai and co-workers [138] processed the poly(lactic acid)/montmorillonite nanocomposite through the laser sintering method. Figure 6 illustrates an enhancement in the flexural modulus using three different laser powers (15, 16, and 17 W).
The poly(lactic acid)/montmorillonite nanocomposite presented development in the flexural modulus (41%), relative to the neat poly(lactic acid) [139]. In addition, polycaprolactone has been used as a relevant biodegradable matrix for nanoclay nanofillers [140,141,142]. The polycaprolactone/montmorillonite nanocomposites revealed the antimicrobial and toxic ion removal properties [143,144].

4.4. Natural Rubber/Nanoclay Nanocomposite

The nanoclay and silica nanoparticles have been successfully reinforced in the natural rubber matrix to develop green nanocomposites [145,146]. The nanofiller dispersion, polymer–nanofiller interactions, and morphological and mechanical profiles have been investigated. The exfoliation of nanoclay nanoplatelets in the natural rubber matrix caused nano-reinforcement effects [147,148]. Perra et al. [149] formed an organoclay based on the cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide-modified montmorillonite. The organoclay was reinforced in a natural rubber matrix, and dispersion and morphological properties were studied. The strength and hardness of the natural rubber were found to improve with the increasing nanoclay contents. Siririttikrai et al. [150] developed natural rubber/nanoclay nanocomposite-based compounds and vulcanizates. The nanoclay nanoparticle coagulation was observed in the rubber matrix. The viscosity of the nanocomposite, with varying nanoclay contents, was determined. An increase in viscosity was observed due to the nanoclay aggregation effect. George et al. [151] prepared natural rubber and organomodified Cloisite nanoclay-derived nanomaterial using the melt blending method. The natural rubber/Cloisite nanocomposite revealed high tensile strength and modulus with the inclusion of 5 phr nanofiller content. The enhancement in mechanical properties was observed due to better nanoclays dispersion and exfoliation in the natural rubber matrix. Sookyung et al. [152] prepared the sodium montmorillonite nanoclay and converted to an organoclay using octadecylamine as a modifying agent. The resulting organoclay was dispersed in the natural rubber matrix. The organoclays with greater d-spacing resulted in a higher degree of dispersion in the natural rubber matrix. Consequently, the mechanical and thermal stabilities of natural rubber/organoclay nanocomposites were enhanced. In almost all the natural rubber-based systems, organoclays revealed better dispersion, exfoliation, and interactions with the elastomeric matrix, subsequently increasing the final material properties.

4.5. Silk/Nanoclay Nanocomposite

Silk is a natural protein fiber, which is made up of fibroin [153]. The protein fiber of silk is naturally derived from insect larvae. Silk protein has been reported to form high performance nanocomposites with nanoclay nanofillers [154]. Devi et al. [155] developed biodegradable nanocomposites based on a silk matrix and nanoclay nanofiller. The inclusion of 2 phr nanoclay content considerably enhanced the tensile strength/modulus and flexural strength/modulus of the silk/nanoclay nanocomposites, relative to the pristine silk protein. The enhancement in the mechanical properties was observed due to the reinforcing effect of the two-dimensional nanoplatelets and better nanoclay dispersion in the silk matrix. Doblhofer et al. [156] prepared the spider silk protein and layered silicate sodium hectorite-based nanomaterials using the all-aqueous process. The inclusion of nanoclay nanoplatelets offered a fine barrier towards the permeating oxygen molecules and water vapors, through the formation of tortuous paths in the silk matrix. The biocompatible spider silk/hectorite nanoclay nanocomposites have been used in packaging applications due to fine oxygen and water vapor barrier properties. In another attempt, Chen et al. [157] designed silk peptide/chitosan films filled with two types of nanoclays, i.e., montmorillonite and sepiolite, through solution casting route. The montmorillonite nanoclay revealed better reinforcing effects to enhance the mechanical properties of the nanocomposite, due to better nanofiller dispersion. On the other hand, sepiolite nanoclay was less effective in improving the mechanical properties of the nanocomposite, owing to poor dispersion in the matrix. Zhang et al. [158] proposed the silk fibroin/laponite nanoclay nanocomposite-based enzymatically crosslinked hydrogel. The nanocomposite hydrogel was found to be effective in improving the thermal and chemical stability properties. It has been observed that the well oriented self-assembled spider silk proteins on the nanoclay surface produced high barrier properties towards oxygen molecules and water vapors. Moreover, the silk fibroin/Laponite nanoclay nanocomposite was effectively applied in tissue engineering applications, especially to repair hyaline cartilage tissues. The silk fibroin/laponite nanoclay nanocomposite hydrogel was biocompatible and was capable of inducing osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow stem cells. Kadumudi et al. [159] reinforced the silk fibroins with the laponite nanoclay to form flexible and electroactive thin films. The silk/laponite nanocomposites were water insoluble and thermally and chemically stable. The nanocomposites were used to form highly flexible and ecofriendly wearable motion sensitive sensors. It has been observed that the two-dimensional nanoclay nanoplatelets caused increased folding of the polypeptide chains, so resulted in more ordered and crystalline configurations. The green sensors revealed accurate and fast response time during bending and stretching states. Hence, the silk/nanoclay nanocomposites revealed fine physical properties and applications related to strength, packaging, tissue engineering, and flexible sensor fields.

5. Significance of Green Polymer/Nanoclay Nanocomposite

5.1. Sustainability

Nanoclays have been frequently adopted as ecofriendly nanomaterials in the green nanocomposites (Figure 7). Nanoclays own extensive sustainable applications in environmental and ecological friendly areas [160]. The use of the nanoclay-based green nanocomposite in sustainability applications has promoted the economic conditions of the industries and countries [49]. Consequently, the industries employing sustainable nanomaterials play an important part in uplifting the economic conditions of the countries [161]. In construction materials, nanoclays have been introduced to enhance the intrinsic strength and stability properties [162,163]. In the construction industry, nanoclay-based materials have been used to substitute the cement and also to develop the high-performance concrete [164]. Thus, nanoclay-based construction technologies have paved ways towards sustainable engineering applications [165]. The sustainable construction structures have low porosity and permeability, and high durability, compressive/flexural strength, heat resistance, and resistance to chemicals attack [166].
An essential use of nanoclay-derived materials has been observed in the remediation of environmental contaminants [167,168,169]. Here, the sustainable nanoclay-based nanomaterials act as a biodegradation promoter. The organically modified nanoclays and polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites have improved biocompatibility with living organisms, as compared to the non-modified nanoclays [170]. Therefore, the nanoclay-derived green nanomaterials have been beneficially employed in natural systems avoiding any harmful effects for ecosystem recovery. Accordingly, the use of nanoclays in the agriculture sector has grown enormously. The organoclay-derived nanomaterials have been found to be promising as rheological modifiers, gas absorbents, and drug delivery carriers [171,172,173]. Hence, the nanoclay-based nanomaterials have been used to produce sustainable, regenerative, and reusable environmentally compatible materials.

5.2. Membranes/Packaging

Owing to their low cost and light weight, synthetic polymers have been recurrently applied in membranes and packaging industries [174,175,176]. However, the resulting environmental pollution is a major drawback of using these non-degradable synthetic polymers [177]. To resolve this issue, naturally derived polymers or biodegradable polymers have been adopted for packaging applications [178]. The naturally derived polymers have fine decomposable behavior, and so are ideal for packaging applications [179]. Several degradable natural and synthetic polymers have been applied to form ecofriendly membranes or packaging. The cellulose, starch, poly(lactic acid), poly(vinyl alcohol), etc., have been successfully applied in the food industry and electronics industry related to packaging materials [180,181,182]. Such membranes or packaging reveal facile decomposition and recyclability. Garusinghe et al. [183] developed the nanocellulose and montmorillonite nanoclay-derived membranes. The nanocellulose/montmorillonite nanocomposite membranes were tested for the water vapor permeability (WVP) and enhanced nanocomposite tortuosity. Figure 8 presents a mechanism for montmorillonite dispersion in the matrix at a high loading level. The high nanoclay contents decreased the tortuous paths in the nanocomposites and so improved the barrier properties. On the other hand, high-pressure homogenization enhanced the homogeneous dispersion and reduced the nanoclay stacking in nanocellulose/montmorillonite, so increasing the tortuous pathways. However, the nanoclay nanoplatelets have a tendency to restack/aggregate due to electrostatic or van der Waals interactions [184,185]. The WVP of pristine nanocellulose/montmorillonite nanocomposite nanosheets, and the nanocomposite membranes prepared at high-pressure homogenization and sonication steps were measured (Figure 9). For pristine nanocomposite and membrane prepared with high-pressure homogenization, the WVP was reduced with the nanoclay loading and reached a minimum value (6.3–13.3 g·μm/m2·day·kPa) at 16.7–23.1 wt.% loading. However, the WVP was increased pointedly with the nanoclay loading for the nanocomposite prepared via sonication. In the nanocomposites processed by sonication, enhanced WVP was suggestive of better homogenization of cellulose/nanoclay. However, for packaging application, the nanocomposites with low WVP were preferred. Thus, efficient recyclable nanocellulose/montmorillonite nanocomposites-based packaging materials have been designed.
Aulin and co-workers [186] reported the nanocellulose nanofiber and vermiculite nanoclay nanoplatelet-based nanocomposite for packaging membranes. High-pressure homogenization was used to form the nanocellulose nanofiber/vermiculite nanoclay nanomaterials. The nanocomposite membranes revealed high strength and modulus of 257 MPa and 17.3 GPa, respectively. Scanning electron microscopy analysis showed the consistent spreading of nacre like nanoplatelet layers in the nanocellulose matrix. The oxygen permeability of nanocellulose nanofiber/vermiculite nanoclay nanocomposite (0.07 cm3μm·m−2d−1kPa−1 at 50% relative humidity) membrane was found to be better than the commercial cellulose packaging material. The packaging material was proposed for the electronics and barrier coatings for the large laminations. Farmahini-Farahan et al. [187] also designed the cellulose/nanoclay-based packaging materials. Sodium montmorillonite was used as nanofiller in the nanocomposite membranes. Due to the superior barrier effect of the nanoclay, the low water vapor transmission rate was observed, i.e., 43 g/m2/day. Souza et al. [188] prepared the thermoplastic starch carvacrol and essential oil-modified montmorillonite-based packaging. Due to the crystallinity of the nanofiller and fine interactions between the organomodified nanoclay and starch matrix, a strong antimicrobial effect was observed against E. coli bacteria. Thus, the research on naturally derived polymer and nanoclay-based packaging films depicted a potential towards moisture, gases, microbials, etc. and can be utilized in the electronics, food/beverages, and other advanced packaging industries.

5.3. Biomedical Relevance

Nanoclays have been used in numerous biomedical applications due to their high surface-to-volume ratio and biocompatibility effects [189]. Moreover, nanoclays may develop interactions with living systems due to heterogeneous charge distribution [190]. Tissue engineering is a speedily mounting field in regenerative medicine [191]. Recently, the three dimensional scaffolds based on nanomaterials have gained research interest in the field of tissue engineering [192]. Such three-dimensional scaffolds have been found to be effective for tissue reformation [193]. Natural polymer-derived nanostructured materials have gained substantial consideration due to feasible cell attachment and proliferation in the biological environment. Nouro et al. [194] fabricated the poly(ɛ-caprolactone)/nanoclay nanocomposite nanofiber through an electrospinning technique. The presence of dispersed nanoclay nanoparticles generated homogeneous nanofiber structure. The nanoclay nanoparticles facilitated the cell adhesion and bioactivity of the nanofibers to fibroblasts cells for tissue regeneration. Moreover, the poly(ɛ-caprolactone)/nanoclay nanocomposite nanofiber possess fine wettability and degradability properties. In this way, the nanoclay-based nanocomposites acted as active candidates for tissue engineering.
In the drug delivery application, the polymeric scaffolds impregnated with drugs have been studied [195]. In polymer-based scaffolds, the role of solubility, permeability, systemic circulation, and pharmacological response (upon certain concentration) of the drugs have been investigated [196,197]. Ferrández-Rives and co-workers [198] formed electrospun mats of poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel for drug delivery. The efficiency of nanoclay encapsulation in poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposite hydrogel has been studied. The absorption of bovine serum albumin on the nanocomposite hydrogel was considered. The inclusion of nanoclay enhanced the drug entrapment and release behavior in the nanocomposite. Hsu et al. [199] prepared the polycaprolactone, poly-DL-lactic acid, and Laponite (disk-shape) nano-clay based nanocomposite for drug delivery. The drug administration was performed for the treatment of type-2 diabetes to control the body weight and blood glucose level. The drug was used in the gastrointestinal tract to limit food absorption. Accordingly, the biocompatible polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites have good potential for drug delivery applications.
Wound healing application has also demanded the use of nanoclay-based nanomaterials due to the lowering of pain, infection and scarring effects [200,201,202]. Bibi et al. [203] designed the biodegradable poly(vinyl alcohol)/nanoclay nanocomposite to deliver the Penicillin drug to wounds. The nanomaterial had fine antimicrobial effectiveness. Asthana et al. [204] also prepared the poly(vinyl alcohol)/nanoclay nanocomposite through the solution method. The nanocomposite had low microbial growth and high microbiological stability. The material was applied using Aloe vera gel to the wounded skin areas. In addition to montmorillonite, the kaolinite nanoclay has also been used with the poly(vinyl alcohol) matrix to enhance the chemical stability and to lower the infection rate in wound healing applications [205].
For a better judgement purpose, essential green polymer/nanoclay systems for technical applications (sustainability, packaging, drug delivery, tissue engineering, wound healing, and antibacterial purposes) are portrayed in Table 5. The data listed show that comprehensive efforts are still desirable to further expand the implication of green polymer/nanoclay systems in various fields.

6. Encounters, Future and Summary

Nanoclays have been recognized as widely utilized nanofillers for advanced polymeric nanocomposites. In green polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites, degradable polymers and nanoclays (eco nanofiller) have been utilized. The property enhancement has been observed even at a very low nanofiller loading level. Polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites have been prepared through facile processing methods such as solution and melt mixing techniques to accomplish high-performance materials. During nanocomposite processing and final uses, several challenges have been observed and need to be resolved [207,208]. First of all, only a few natural polymers have been reinforced with this green nanofiller. Nanoclay nanoplatelet dispersion, intercalation, and exfoliation strategies need to be improved to attain the homogeneously dispersed nanomaterials [209]. Especially the conversion of nanoclay to nanoclay-based salts and the subsequent formation of the organomodified nanoclay need to be scrutinized. Through effective organophilic ion treatments, the pristine hydrophobic nanoclays have been modified to form the alkyl chain intercalated hydrophilic nanoclay. Organophilic and hydrophilic nanoclays have been found to be compatible with the polymers. The matrix-nanofiller interactions have facilitated the microscopic properties of the green nanocomposites [210]. Moreover, the resulting chemical, mechanical, electrical, non-flammability, and barrier properties have been enhanced [211]. By overcoming the challenges, applications of green polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites can be extended to eco-friendly automobiles, aerospace, construction, electronics, and environmental relevance [212,213,214,215,216]. However, up till now the green polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites have found uses in sustainable materials, eco packaging and membranes, and biomedical areas such as tissue engineering, drug delivery, wound healing, etc. The conventional polymeric materials used in the above-mentioned industries may cause huge environmental issues [217]. The future of sustainable nanoclay nanomaterials rely on the biodegradability of these materials [218]. By adopting sustainability strategies, polymers have been developed from the renewable resources. The green polymers obtained from the renewable sources may lessen the greenhouse emissions. These days, new techniques have been focused to substitute old-fashioned commercial plastics with natural degradable polymers. Researchers need to emphasize the green nanocomposites having better biocompatibility, biodegradability, and sustainability properties.
Briefly, this article offers foundations for the selected green nanofiller, i.e., nanoclay, degradable polymers from natural sources, and their multipurpose applications. The main purpose of this review is to highlight the applications of green polymer/nanoclay nanomaterials. Green polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites have been examined in the various reported categories. The present article aims to assist scientists and researchers to formulate ways to be more ecofriendly to the environment through adopting the innovative green nanomaterials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K.; data curation, A.K.; writing of original draft preparation, A.K.; Review and editing, A.K., I.A., M.M. and M.H.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Masini, J.C.; Abate, G. Guidelines to Study the Adsorption of Pesticides onto Clay Minerals Aiming at a Straightforward Evaluation of Their Removal Performance. Minerals 2021, 11, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Perelomov, L.; Mandzhieva, S.; Minkina, T.; Atroshchenko, Y.; Perelomova, I.; Bauer, T.; Pinsky, D.; Barakhov, A. The synthesis of organoclays based on clay minerals with different structural expansion capacities. Minerals 2021, 11, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Undabeytia, T.; Shuali, U.; Nir, S.; Rubin, B. Applications of chemically modified clay minerals and clays to water purification and slow release formulations of herbicides. Minerals 2020, 11, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jacquet, A.; Geatches, D.L.; Clark, S.J.; Greenwell, H.C. Understanding cationic polymer adsorption on mineral surfaces: Kaolinite in cement aggregates. Minerals 2018, 8, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Lazorenko, G.; Kasprzhitskii, A.; Yavna, V. Comparative study of the hydrophobicity of organo-montmorillonite modified with cationic, amphoteric and nonionic surfactants. Minerals 2020, 10, 732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bergaya, F.; Lagaly, G. Introduction to Clay Science: Techniques and Applications: Developments in Clay Science; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kumar, J.; Jatoi, A.S.; Mazari, S.A.; Ali, E.Y.; Hossain, N.; Abro, R.; Mubarak, N.M.; Sabzoi, N. Advanced Green Nanocomposite Materials for Wastewater Treatment: Sustainable Nanotechnology for Environmental Remediation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 297–321. [Google Scholar]
  8. Alhanish, A.; Ali, G.A.M. Recent Developments in Wastewater Treatment Using Polymer/Clay Nanocompo-sites. In Advances in Nanocomposite Materials for Environmental and Energy Harvesting Applications. Engineering Materials; Shalan, A.E., Hamdy Makhlouf, A.S., Lanceros-Méndez, S., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tripathi, M.; Singh, B. Synthesis of Green Nanocomposite Material for Engineering Application: Sustainable Nanotechnology for Environmental Remediation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 135–157. [Google Scholar]
  10. Shokrani, H.; Shokrani, A.; Jouyandeh, M.; Seidi, F.; Gholami, F.; Kar, S.; Munir, M.T.; Kowalkowska-Zedler, D.; Zarrintaj, P.; Rabiee, N. Green polymer nanocomposites for skin tissue engineering. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2022, 5, 2107–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Barra, A.; Nunes, C.; Ruiz-Hitzky, E.; Ferreira, P. Green Carbon Nanostructures for Functional Composite Materials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Thakur, M.; Chandel, M.; Rani, A.; Sharma, A. Introduction to Biorenewable Nanocomposite Materials: Methods of Preparation, Current Developments, and Future Perspectives: Biorenewable Nanocomposite Materials, Vol. 2: Desalination and Wastewater Remediation; ACS Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2022; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  13. Idumah, C.I.; Okonkwo, U.; Obele, C. Recently Emerging Advancements in Montmorillonite Polymeric Nanoarchitectures and Applications. Clean. Mater. 2022, 4, 100071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Paul, A.; Augustine, R.; Hasan, A.; Zahid, A.A.; Thomas, S.; Agatemor, C.; Ghosal, K. Halloysite nanotube and chitosan polymer composites: Physicochemical and drug delivery properties. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2022, 72, 103380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Palem, R.R.; Rao, K.M.; Shimoga, G.; Saratale, R.G.; Shinde, S.K.; Ghodake, G.S.; Lee, S.-H. Physicochemical characterization, drug release, and biocompatibility evaluation of carboxymethyl cellulose-based hydrogels reinforced with sepiolite nanoclay. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 178, 464–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wu, Y.; Wu, J.; Mei, C.; Yang, R.; He, W.; Li, X.; Cai, L.; Guo, M.; Li, J.; Xia, C. Thermal and flame-retardant properties of multilayered composites prepared through novel multilayering approach. Environ. Res. 2022, 213, 113724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gamage, A.; Thiviya, P.; Mani, S.; Ponnusamy, P.G.; Manamperi, A.; Evon, P.; Merah, O.; Madhujith, T. Environmental Properties and Applications of Biodegradable Starch-Based Nanocomposites. Polymers 2022, 14, 4578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Calesco, M.; Watanuki Filho, A.; de Moura, M.; Aouada, F. Effects of addition of hybrid nanocomposite based on polysaccharide hydrogel and nanoclay on the fresh and hardened properties of cementitious mortars. Cerâmica 2022, 68, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ramesh, M.; Maniraj, J.; Kumar, S.G. Polysaccharide-Fibrous Clay Bionanocomposites and their Applications. Adv. Appl. Micro Nano Clay Biopolym.-Based Compos. 2022, 125, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mihankhah, P.; Azdast, T.; Mohammadzadeh, H.; Hasanzadeh, R.; Aghaiee, S. Fused filament fabrication of biodegradable polylactic acid reinforced by nanoclay as a potential biomedical material. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2021, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Oliver-Ortega, H.; Vandemoortele, V.; Bala, A.; Julian, F.; Méndez, J.A.; Espinach, F.X. Nanoclay effect into the biodegradation and processability of poly (lactic acid) nanocomposites for food packaging. Polymers 2021, 13, 2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chaiwutthinan, P.; Phutfak, N.; Larpkasemsuk, A. Effects of thermoplastic poly (ether-ester) elastomer and bentonite nanoclay on properties of poly (lactic acid). J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, 138, 50443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nair, R.; Bhattacharya, A.; Bhowmik, P.; Kant, R. Effect of surface modification on mechanical properties of filature silk waste and nanoclay filler-based polymer matrix composite. Polym. Polym. Compos. 2021, 29, S696–S706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yadav, R.; Purwar, R.; Bose, U. Studies of rheological, electrical, and optical properties of silk fibroin/Benzalkonium chloride modified MMT clay nanocomposite films. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 45, 4998–5004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wongvasana, B.; Thongnuanchan, B.; Masa, A.; Saito, H.; Sakai, T.; Lopattananon, N. Comparative Structure–Property Relationship between Nanoclay and Cellulose Nanofiber Reinforced Natural Rubber Nanocomposites. Polymers 2022, 14, 3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Miedzianowska, J.; Masłowski, M.; Rybiński, P.; Strzelec, K. Modified nanoclays/straw fillers as functional additives of natural rubber biocomposites. Polymers 2021, 13, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mohanty, T.R.; Neeraj, P.; Ramakrishnan, S.; Amarnath, S.; Lorenzetti, D.; Mohamed, P.; Tyres, A. Sepiolite nanoclay: A reinforcing filler in the natural rubber/butadiene rubber (NR/BR) matrix for tire tread compound application. Rubber World 2021, 263, 32–44. [Google Scholar]
  28. Abulyazied, D.E.; Ene, A. An investigative study on the progress of nanoclay-reinforced polymers: Preparation, properties, and applications: A review. Polymers 2021, 13, 4401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hosseini, S.A.; Daneshvar e Asl, S.; Vossoughi, M.; Simchi, A.; Sadrzadeh, M. Green electrospun membranes based on chitosan/amino-functionalized nanoclay composite fibers for cationic dye removal: Synthesis and kinetic studies. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 10816–10827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kango, S.; Kalia, S.; Celli, A.; Njuguna, J.; Habibi, Y.; Kumar, R. Surface modification of inorganic nanoparticles for development of organic–inorganic nanocomposites—A review. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38, 1232–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tullio, S.; Chalcraft, D. Converting natural nanoclay into modified nanoclay augments the toxic effect of natural nanoclay on aquatic invertebrates. Ecotoxic. Environ. Saf. 2020, 197, 110602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Galimberti, M. Rubber-Clay Nanocomposites: Science, Technology, and Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  33. Mousavi, M.; Fini, E.H.; Hung, A.M. Underlying molecular interactions between sodium montmorillonite clay and acidic bitumen. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 15513–15522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, A.; Wang, A.-Q.; Chen, J.-M. Preparation and Properties of Poly (acrylic acid-potassium acrylate)/Attapulgite Superabsorbent Composite. J. Funct. Polym. 2004, 17, 200–206. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mazloomi, F.; Jalali, M. Effects of vermiculite, nanoclay and zeolite on ammonium transport through saturated sandy loam soil: Column experiments and modeling approaches. Catena 2019, 176, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Adebajo, M.O.; Frost, R.L.; Kloprogge, J.T.; Carmody, O.; Kokot, S. Porous materials for oil spill cleanup: A review of synthesis and absorbing properties. J. Porous Mater. 2003, 10, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Srithammaraj, K. Electrical Property-Investigation of Porous Clay Heterostructures Derived from Naturally-Occurring Clay Minerals for Smart Packaging. Ph.D. Thesis, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  38. Taylor, R.; Smith, T. The engineering geology of clay minerals: Swelling, shrinking and mudrock breakdown. Clay Miner. 1986, 21, 235–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ma, C.; Eggleton, R.A. Cation exchange capacity of kaolinite. Clays Clay Miner. 1999, 47, 174–180. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wypych, F.; Bergaya, F.; Schoonheydt, R.A. From Polymers to Clay Polymer Nanocomposites: Developments in Clay Science; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 331–359. [Google Scholar]
  41. Albdiry, M.; Yousif, B.; Ku, H.; Lau, K. A critical review on the manufacturing processes n relation to the properties of nanoclay/polymer composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2013, 47, 1093–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Abdullah, M.M.A.B.; Ming, L.Y.; Yong, H.C.; Tahir, M.F.M. Clay-Based Materials in Geopolymer Technology: Cement Based Materials; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  43. Misaelides, P. Clay Minerals and Zeolites for Radioactive Waste Immobilization and Containment: A Concise Verview: Modified Clay and Zeolite Nanocomposite Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 243–274. [Google Scholar]
  44. Shunmugasamy, V.C.; Xiang, C.; Gupta, N. Clay/Polymer Nanocomposites: Processing, Properties, and Applications: Hybrid and Hierarchical Composite Materials; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 161–200. [Google Scholar]
  45. Rafiee, R.; Shahzadi, R. Mechanical properties of nanoclay and nanoclay reinforced polymers: A review. Polym. Compos. 2019, 40, 431–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Das, P.; Manna, S.; Behera, A.K.; Shee, M.; Basak, P.; Sharma, A.K. Current synthesis and characterization techniques for clay-based polymer nano-composites and its biomedical applications: A review. Environ. Res. 2022, 212, 113534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kim, H.C.; Kwon, Y.R.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, D.H. Surface-crosslinking in the presence of nanoclay and characteristics of the itaconic acid-based superabsorbent polymer composites. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Mater. 2022, 2022, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Alias, A.H.; Norizan, M.N.; Sabaruddin, F.A.; Asyraf, M.R.M.; Norrrahim, M.N.F.; Ilyas, A.R.; Kuzmin, A.M.; Rayung, M.; Shazleen, S.S.; Nazrin, A. Hybridization of MMT/lignocellulosic fiber reinforced polymer nanocomposites for structural applications: A review. Coatings 2021, 11, 1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Guo, F.; Aryana, S.; Han, Y.; Jiao, Y. A review of the synthesis and applications of polymer–nanoclay composites. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Barmouz, M.; Seyfi, J.; Givi, M.K.B.; Hejazi, I.; Davachi, S.M. A novel approach for producing polymer nanocomposites by in-situ dispersion of clay particles via friction stir processing. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2011, 528, 3003–3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chinellato, A.; Vidotti, S.; Hu, G.-H.; Pessan, L. Compatibilizing effect of acrylic acid modified polypropylene on the morphology and permeability properties of polypropylene/organoclay nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2010, 70, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Selvakumar, V.; Palanikumar, K.; Palanivelu, K. Studies on mechanical characterization of polypropylene/Na-MMT nanocomposites. J. Miner. Mater. Charact. Eng. 2010, 9, 671. [Google Scholar]
  53. Tang, W.; Song, L.; Zhang, S.; Li, H.; Sun, J.; Gu, X. Preparation of thiourea-intercalated kaolinite and its influence on thermostability and flammability of polypropylene composite. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 52, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tang, W.; Song, L.; Liu, F.; Dessie, W.; Qin, Z.; Zhang, S.; Gu, X. Improving the flame retardancy and thermal stability of polypropylene composites via introducing glycine intercalated kaolinite compounds. Appl. Clay Sci. 2022, 217, 106411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Touati, N.; Kaci, M.; Bruzaud, S.; Grohens, Y. The effects of reprocessing cycles on the structure and properties of isotactic polypropylene/cloisite 15A nanocomposites. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2011, 96, 1064–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Samal, S.K.; Nayak, S.K.; Mohanty, S. Polypropylene nanocomposites: Effect of organo-modified layered silicates on mechanical, thermal & morphological performance. J. Thermoplas. Compos. Mater. 2008, 21, 243–263. [Google Scholar]
  57. Kumar, V.; Singh, A. Polypropylene clay nanocomposites. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2013, 29, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Asensio, M.; Herrero, M.; Núñez, K.; Gallego, R.; Merino, J.C.; Pastor, J.M. In situ polymerization of isotactic polypropylene sepiolite nanocomposites and its copolymers by metallocene catalysis. Eur. Polym. J. 2018, 100, 278–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kumar, A.; Kumar, S.; Tripathi, B.P. Polydopamine primed phosphorylated sepiolite-Polypropylene nanocomposite with enhanced thermal, rheological, and flame retardant properties. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2022, 202, 110005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fakhri, L.A.; Ghanbarzadeh, B.; Dehghannya, J.; Abbasi, F.; Ranjbar, H. Optimization of mechanical and color properties of polystyrene/nanoclay/nano ZnO based nanocomposite packaging sheet using response surface methodology. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2018, 17, 11–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ahmed, L.; Zhang, B.; Shen, R.; Agnew, R.J.; Park, H.; Cheng, Z.; Mannan, M.S.; Wang, Q. Fire reaction properties of polystyrene-based nanocomposites using nanosilica and nanoclay as additives in cone calorimeter test. J. Therm. Anal. Calor. 2018, 132, 1853–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pilevar, Z.; Bahrami, A.; Beikzadeh, S.; Hosseini, H.; Jafari, S.M. Migration of styrene monomer from polystyrene packaging materials into foods: Characterization and safety evaluation. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 91, 248–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Awad, S.A. Mechanical and thermal characterisations of low-density polyethylene/nanoclay composites. Polym. Polym. Compos. 2021, 29, 1325–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Karami, S.; Nazockdast, H.; Ahmadi, Z.; Rabolt, J.F.; Noda, I.; Chase, D.B. Microstructure effects on the rheology of nanoclay-filled PHB/LDPE blends. Polym. Compos. 2019, 40, 4125–4134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mansourian, A.; Goahri, A.R.; Khosrowshahi, F.K. Performance evaluation of asphalt binder modified with EVA/HDPE/nanoclay based on linear and non-linear viscoelastic behaviors. Construct. Build. Mater. 2019, 208, 554–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sánchez-Valdes, S. High-density polyethylene/recycled HDPE/nanoclay composites using an amine-alcohol modified polyethylene as a compatibilizer. Iran. Polym. J. 2021, 30, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Luo, J.; Tian, Q.; Qin, S.; Qi, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, D. Effect of organoclay content on thermal stability properties of polypropylene/organoclay nanocomposites. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2022, 35, 533–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Žiganova, M.; Merijs-Meri, R.; Zicāns, J.; Ivanova, T.; Bochkov, I.; Kalniņš, M.; Błędzki, A.K.; Danilovas, P.P. Characterisation of Nanoclay and Spelt Husk Microfiller-Modified Polypropylene Composites. Polymers 2022, 14, 4332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lu, X. Transparent, Biaxially Oriented Barrier Films from Polypropylene-Clay Nanocomposites. Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  70. Valério, M.B.; dos Santos, L.E.; de Carvalho, L.J.; Reznik, L.Y.; da Silva, A.L.N. Barrier behavior evaluation of polyamide 12 nanoclay composite to offshore application by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2022, 139, 51863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tajuddin, M.; Yusof, N.; Fajrina, N.; Salleh, W.; Ismail, A.; Jaafar, J.; Aziz, F. Tailoring the properties of polyamide thin film membrane with layered double hydroxide nanoclay for enhancement in water separation. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2022, 34, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Paara, T.; Lange, S.; Kristjan, S.; Lõhmus, R.; Krumme, A.; Mändar, H. Improving the Oxygen Barrier of Polyamide Food Packaging by Using Nanoclay. Mater. Sci. 2022, 28, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bangera, M.K.; Kotian, R.; Natarajan, S.; Somasundaram, J.; Mangalath, D.L. Effects of graphene nanoplatelets and montmorillonite nanoclay reinforcement on dental polymethyl methacrylate. Polym. Compos. 2022, 43, 3626–3638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sengwa, R.; Dhatarwal, P. Toward multifunctionality of PEO/PMMA/MMT hybrid polymer nanocomposites: Promising morphological, nanostructural, thermal, broadband dielectric, and optical properties. J. Phys. Chem. Sol. 2022, 166, 110708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kausar, A.; Bocchetta, P. Poly (methyl methacrylate) Nanocomposite Foams Reinforced with Carbon and Inorganic Nanoparticles—State-of-the-Art. J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hussain, S.; Al-Sarraf, A. Influence of Bioactive and Bio Inert Ceramic Powders on Tribology Properties of PMMA Composite Denture Base. J. Biomimet. Biomater. Biomed. Eng. 2022, 57, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Elakkiya, S.; Arthanareeswaran, G. Hydrophilic nanoclay-polyaniline decorated membrane with improved permeability for separation of endocrine-disrupting chemical and fitness of fouling using model. J. Indus. Eng. Chem. 2022, 110, 234–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Nigil, M.R.; Ramanujam, B.T.S.; Thiruvengadathan, R. Nanoclay-based Polymer Nanocomposites for Electromagnetic Interference Shielding. Adv. Appl. Micro Nano Clay II Synth. Polym. Compos. 2022, 129, 53–78. [Google Scholar]
  79. Landim, V.P.; Foguel, M.V.; Prado, C.M.; Sotomayor, M.P.; Vieira, I.C.; Silva, B.V.; Dutra, R.F. A Polypyrrole/Nanoclay Hybrid Film for Ultra-Sensitive Cardiac Troponin T Electrochemical Immunosensor. Biosensors 2022, 12, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Motaung, T.E.; Linganiso, L.Z. Critical review on agrowaste cellulose applications for biopolymers. Int. J. Plast. Technol. 2018, 22, 185–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gul, S.; Kausar, A.; Muhammad, B.; Jabeen, S. Research progress on properties and applications of polymer/clay nanocomposite. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Mater. 2022, 55, 684–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kiliaris, P.; Papaspyrides, C. Polymer/layered silicate (clay) nanocomposites: An overview of flame retardancy. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35, 902–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tabone, M.D.; Cregg, J.J.; Beckman, E.J.; Landis, A.E. Sustainability metrics: Life cycle assessment and green design in polymers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 8264–8269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wood, C.D.; Cooper, A.I.; DeSimone, J.M. Green synthesis of polymers using supercritical carbon dioxide. Curr. Opin. Sol. Stat. Mater. Sci. 2004, 8, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Bagheri, A.R.; Arabi, M.; Ghaedi, M.; Ostovan, A.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Chen, L. Dummy molecularly imprinted polymers based on a green synthesis strategy for magnetic solid-phase extraction of acrylamide in food samples. Talanta 2019, 195, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Marti, M.; Molina, L.; Aleman, C.; Armelin, E. Novel epoxy coating based on DMSO as a green solvent, reducing drastically the volatile organic compound content and using conducting polymers as a nontoxic anticorrosive pigment. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2013, 1, 1609–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Iordanskii, A.; Kamaev, P.; Olkhov, A.; Wasserman, A. Water transport phenomena in greenand petrochemicalpolymers. Differences and similarities. Desalination 1999, 126, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yuan, C.; Chen, M.; Luo, J.; Li, X.; Gao, Q.; Li, J. A novel water-based process produces eco-friendly bio-adhesive made from green cross-linked soybean soluble polysaccharide and soy protein. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 169, 417–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Jahangirian, H.; Lemraski, E.G.; Webster, T.J.; Rafiee-Moghaddam, R.; Abdollahi, Y. A review of drug delivery systems based on nanotechnology and green chemistry: Green nanomedicine. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Green, J.J.; Elisseeff, J.H. Mimicking biological functionality with polymers for biomedical applications. Nature 2016, 540, 386–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kalantari, K.; Afifi, A.M.; Jahangirian, H.; Webster, T.J. Biomedical applications of chitosan electrospun nanofibers as a green polymer–Review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 207, 588–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sevastyanova, O.; Qin, W.; Kadla, J. Effect of nanofillers as reinforcement agents for lignin composite fibers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 117, 2877–2881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Patanair, B.; Saiter-Fourcin, A.; Thomas, S.; Thomas, M.G.; Parathukkamparambil Pundarikashan, P.; Gopalan Nair, K.; Kumar, V.K.; Maria, H.J.; Delpouve, N. Promoting interfacial interactions with the addition of lignin in poly (lactic acid) hybrid nanocomposites. Polymers 2021, 13, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Tang, C.; Chen, N.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, K.; Fu, Q.; Zhang, X. Preparation and properties of chitosan nanocomposites with nanofillers of different dimensions. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2009, 94, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Fauzi, B.; Nawawi, M.G.M.; Fauzi, R.; Mamauod, S.N.L. Physicochemical characteristics of sago starch-chitosan nanofillers film. BioResources 2019, 14, 8324–8330. [Google Scholar]
  96. Grossman, A.; Vermerris, W. Lignin-based polymers and nanomaterials. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019, 56, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lancefield, C.S.; Westwood, N.J. The synthesis and analysis of advanced lignin model polymers. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 4980–4990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Jayrajsinh, S.; Shankar, G.; Agrawal, Y.K.; Bakre, L. Montmorillonite nanoclay as a multifaceted drug-delivery carrier: A review. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2017, 39, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Nazir, M.S.; Kassim, M.H.M.; Mohapatra, L.; Gilani, M.A.; Raza, M.R.; Majeed, K. Characteristic Properties of Nanoclays and Characterization of Nanoparticulates and Nanocomposites: Nanoclay Reinforced Polymer Composites; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 35–55. [Google Scholar]
  100. Hosseini, S.M.S.; Mirzaei, M. Assessment of the colloidal montmorillonite dispersion as a low-cost and eco-friendly nanofluid for improving thermal performance of plate heat exchanger. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Penchah, H.R.; Ghaemi, A.; Godarziani, H. Eco-friendly CO2 adsorbent by impregnation of diethanolamine in nanoclay montmorillonite. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 55754–55770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Ngwabebhoh, F.A.; Erdem, A.; Yildiz, U. Synergistic removal of Cu (II) and nitrazine yellow dye using an eco-friendly chitosan-montmorillonite hydrogel: Optimization by response surface methodology. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Bordes, P.; Pollet, E.; Avérous, L. Nano-biocomposites: Biodegradable polyester/nanoclay systems. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2009, 34, 125–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Mallakpour, S.; Dinari, M. Synthesis and properties of biodegradable poly (vinyl alcohol)/organo-nanoclay bionanocomposites. J. Polym. Environ. 2012, 20, 732–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kim, Y. TEMPO-Oxidized Nanofibrillated Cellulose Film (NFC) Incorporating Graphene Oxide (GO) Nanofillers; Virginia Tech: Blacksburg, VA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  106. Wu, Y.-Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, C.; Zheng, Z.; Lambert, P. Effect of graphene oxide nanosheets on physical properties of ultra-high-performance concrete with high volume supplementary cementitious materials. Materials 2020, 13, 1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Wang, R.; Zhang, J.; Kang, H.; Zhang, L. Design, preparation and properties of bio-based elastomer composites aiming at engineering applications. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2016, 133, 136–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Alves, L.; Ferraz, E.; Gamelas, J. Composites of nanofibrillated cellulose with clay minerals: A review. Adv. Coll. Interf. Sci. 2019, 272, 101994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Singhal, S.; Agarwal, S.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, V.; Prajapati, S.K.; Kumar, T.; Singhal, N. Waste Clothes to Microcrystalline Cellulose: An Experimental Investigation. J. Polym. Environ. 2022, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Olusanya, J.O.; Mohan, T.; Kanny, K. Effect of cellulose-nanoparticles (CNPs) and nanoclay (NC) reinforced starch based biocomposite films on thermal and mechanical properties. Res. Sq. 2022, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Chakkour, M.; Ould Moussa, M.; Khay, I.; Balli, M.; Ben Zineb, T. Towards widespread properties of cellulosic fibers composites: A comprehensive review. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Barbi, S.; Taurino, C.; La China, S.; Anguluri, K.; Gullo, M.; Montorsi, M. Mechanical and structural properties of environmental green composites based on functionalized bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 2021, 28, 1431–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Ming, S.; Chen, G.; He, J.; Kuang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tao, R.; Ning, H.; Zhu, P.; Liu, Y.; Fang, Z. Highly transparent and self-extinguishing nanofibrillated cellulose-monolayer clay nanoplatelet hybrid films. Langmuir 2017, 33, 8455–8462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ferfera-Harrar, H.; Dairi, N. Green nanocomposite films based on cellulose acetate and biopolymer-modified nanoclays: Studies on morphology and properties. Iran. Polym. J. 2014, 23, 917–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Duan, J.; Gong, S.; Gao, Y.; Xie, X.; Jiang, L.; Cheng, Q. Bioinspired ternary artificial nacre nanocomposites based on reduced graphene oxide and nanofibrillar cellulose. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 2016, 8, 10545–10550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Kadumudi, F.B.; Trifol, J.; Jahanshahi, M.; Zsurzsan, T.-G.; Mehrali, M.; Zeqiraj, E.; Shaki, H.; Alehosseini, M.; Gundlach, C.; Li, Q. Flexible and green electronics manufactured by origami folding of nanosilicate-reinforced cellulose paper. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 2020, 12, 48027–48039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Mary, S.K.; Koshy, R.R.; Arunima, R.; Thomas, S.; Pothen, L.A. A review of recent advances in starch-based materials: Bionanocomposites, pH sensitive films, aerogels and carbon dots. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2022, 3, 100190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zhiguang, C.; Junrong, H.; Huayin, P.; Keipper, W. The Effects of Temperature on Starch Molecular Conformation and Hydrogen Bonding. Starch-Stärke 2022, 74, 2100288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Shahbaz, A.; Hussain, N.; Basra, M.A.R.; Bilal, M. Polysaccharides-Based Nano-Hybrid Biomaterial Platforms for Tissue Engineering, Drug Delivery, and Food Packaging Applications. Starch-Stärke 2022, 74, 2200023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Madhumitha, G.; Fowsiya, J.; Mohana Roopan, S.; Thakur, V.K. Recent advances in starch–clay nanocomposites. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. 2018, 23, 331–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Paluch, M.; Ostrowska, J.; Tyński, P.; Sadurski, W.; Konkol, M. Structural and Thermal Properties of Starch Plasticized with Glycerol/Urea Mixture. J. Polym. Environ. 2022, 30, 728–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ben, Z.Y.; Samsudin, H.; Yhaya, M.F. Glycerol: Its properties, polymer synthesis, and applications in starch based films. Eur. Polym. J. 2022, 175, 111377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Mansour, G.; Zoumaki, M.; Marinopoulou, A.; Tzetzis, D.; Prevezanos, M.; Raphaelides, S.N. Characterization and properties of non-granular thermoplastic starch—Clay biocomposite films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 245, 116629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Pandey, J.K.; Singh, R.P. Green nanocomposites from renewable resources: Effect of plasticizer on the structure and material properties of clay-filled starch. Starch-Stärke 2005, 57, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Almasi, H.; Ghanbarzadeh, B.; Entezami, A.A. Physicochemical properties of starch–CMC–nanoclay biodegradable films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2010, 46, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Cheng, M.; Wang, J.; Zhang, R.; Kong, R.; Lu, W.; Wang, X. Characterization and application of the microencapsulated carvacrol/sodium alginate films as food packaging materials. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 141, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Hasany, M.; Talebian, S.; Sadat, S.; Ranjbar, N.; Mehrali, M.; Wallace, G.G.; Mehrali, M. Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of alginate methacrylate (ALMA)-based hydrogels: Current advances and challenges. Appl. Mater. Today 2021, 24, 101150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Wei, J.; Wang, B.; Li, Z.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, M.; Sheng, N.; Liang, Q.; Wang, H.; Chen, S. A 3D-printable TEMPO-oxidized bacterial cellulose/alginate hydrogel with enhanced stability via nanoclay incorporation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 238, 116207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Shahbazi, M.; Jäger, H.; Ahmadi, S.J.; Lacroix, M. Electron beam crosslinking of alginate/nanoclay ink to improve functional properties of 3D printed hydrogel for removing heavy metal ions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 240, 116211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhou, Z.; Cai, K.; Shen, J.; Cai, L.; Dai, B.; Wang, Z.; Ma, P.; Liu, J.; Shen, X. Fabrication and biological assessment of halloysite-doped micro/nano structures on titanium surface. Ceram. Int. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Karolina Pierchala, M.; Kadumudi, F.B.; Mehrali, M.; Zsurzsan, T.G.; Kempen, P.J.; Serdeczny, M.P.; Spangenberg, J.; Andresen, T.L.; Dolatshahi-Pirouz, A. Soft electronic materials with combinatorial properties generated via mussel-inspired chemistry and halloysite nanotube reinforcement. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 9531–9549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Makaremi, M.; Pasbakhsh, P.; Cavallaro, G.; Lazzara, G.; Aw, Y.K.; Lee, S.M.; Milioto, S. Effect of morphology and size of halloysite nanotubes on functional pectin bionanocomposites for food packaging applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 2017, 9, 17476–17488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Bertolino, V.; Cavallaro, G.; Milioto, S.; Lazzara, G. Polysaccharides/Halloysite nanotubes for smart bionanocomposite materials. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 245, 116502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Parvathy, S.; Hema, S.; Sajith, M.; Sulthan, R.; Sreelekshmi, C.; Sambhudevan, S.; Shankar, B. A Review on Barrier Properties of Nanocellulose and Polylactic acid Composites. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 1258, 012017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Shao, L.; Xi, Y.; Weng, Y. Recent Advances in PLA-Based Antibacterial Food Packaging and Its Applications. Molecules 2022, 27, 5953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Darie, R.N.; Pâslaru, E.; Sdrobis, A.; Pricope, G.M.; Hitruc, G.E.; Poiată, A.; Baklavaridis, A.; Vasile, C. Effect of nanoclay hydrophilicity on the poly (lactic acid)/clay nanocomposites properties. Indus. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 7877–7890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Grigora, M.-E.; Terzopoulou, Z.; Tsongas, K.; Bikiaris, D.N.; Tzetzis, D. Physicochemical Characterization and Finite Element Analysis-Assisted Mechanical Behavior of Polylactic Acid-Montmorillonite 3D Printed Nanocomposites. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Bai, J.; Goodridge, R.D.; Hague, R.J.; Okamoto, M. Processing and characterization of a polylactic acid/nanoclay composite for laser sintering. Polym. Compos. 2017, 38, 2570–2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Eng, C.C.; Ibrahim, N.A.; Zainuddin, N.; Ariffin, H.; Yunus, W.M.; Wan, Z.; Then, Y.Y.; Teh, C.C. Enhancement of mechanical and thermal properties of polylactic acid/polycaprolactone blends by hydrophilic nanoclay. Indian J. Mater. Sci. 2013, 2013, 816503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Irandoost, M.; Pezeshki-Modaress, M.; Javanbakht, V. Removal of lead from aqueous solution with nanofibrous nanocomposite of polycaprolactone adsorbent modified by nanoclay and nanozeolite. J. Water Proc. Eng. 2019, 32, 100981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Sri, H.; Ganapathy, D.; Sivaswamy, V.; Veeraiyan, D.N.; Venugopalan, S. Osteogenic Effectiveness of 3d Printed Polycaprolactone Scaffold Implanted with Metallic Bone Regenerative Compounds—A Systematic Review. J. Pharmaceut. Negat. Res. 2022, 13, 514–523. [Google Scholar]
  142. Kazemzadeh, G.; Jirofti, N.; Kazemi Mehrjerdi, H.; Rajabioun, M.; Alamdaran, S.A.; Mohebbi-Kalhori, D.; Mirbagheri, M.S.; Taheri, R. A review on developments of in-vitro and in-vivo evaluation of hybrid PCL-based natural polymers nanofibers scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering. J. Indus. Text. 2022, 52, 15280837221128314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Sadeghianmaryan, A.; Yazdanpanah, Z.; Soltani, Y.A.; Sardroud, H.A.; Nasirtabrizi, M.H.; Chen, X. Curcumin-loaded electrospun polycaprolactone/montmorillonite nanocomposite: Wound dressing application with anti-bacterial and low cell toxicity properties. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2020, 31, 169–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Stodolak-Zych, E.; Kurpanik, R.; Dzierzkowska, E.; Gajek, M.; Zych, Ł.; Gryń, K.; Rapacz-Kmita, A. Effects of Montmorillonite and Gentamicin Addition on the Properties of Electrospun Polycaprolactone Fibers. Materials 2021, 14, 6905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Bokobza, L. Natural rubber nanocomposites: A review. Nanomaterials 2018, 9, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Araujo-Morera, J.; Verdejo, R.; López-Manchado, M.A.; Santana, M.H. Sustainable mobility: The route of tires through the circular economy model. Waste Manag. 2021, 126, 309–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Kang, S.S.; Choi, K.; Nam, J.-D.; Choi, H.J. Magnetorheological elastomers: Fabrication, characteristics, and applications. Materials 2020, 13, 4597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Keereerak, A.; Sukkhata, N.; Lehman, N.; Nakaramontri, Y.; Sengloyluan, K.; Johns, J.; Kalkornsurapranee, E. Development and Characterization of Unmodified and Modified Natural Rubber Composites Filled with Modified Clay. Polymers 2022, 14, 3515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Perera, S.J.; Egodage, S.M.; Walpalage, S. Enhancement of mechanical properties of natural rubber–clay nanocomposites through incorporation of silanated organoclay into natural rubber latex. e-Polymers 2020, 20, 144–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Siririttikrai, N.; Thanawan, S.; Suchiva, K.; Amornsakchai, T. Comparative study of natural rubber/clay nanocomposites prepared from fresh or concentrated latex. Polym. Test. 2017, 63, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. George, S.C.; Rajan, R.; Aprem, A.S.; Thomas, S.; Kim, S.S. The fabrication and properties of natural rubber-clay nanocomposites. Polym. Test. 2016, 51, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Sookyung, U.; Nakason, C.; Venneman, N.; Thaijaroend, W. Influence concentration of modifying agent on properties of natural rubber/organoclay nanocomposites. Polym. Test. 2016, 54, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Kapoor, S.; Kundu, S.C. Silk protein-based hydrogels: Promising advanced materials for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater. 2016, 31, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Purwar, R. Bionanocomposites Based on Silk Proteins and Nanoclay: Nanotechnology in Textiles; Jenny Stanford Publishing: Singapore, 2020; pp. 179–204. [Google Scholar]
  155. Devi, R.R.; Mandal, M.; Maji, T.K. Physical properties of simul (red-silk cotton) wood (Bombax ceiba L.) chemically modified with styrene acrylonitrile co-polymer and nanoclay. Holzforschung 2012, 66, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Doblhofer, E.; Schmid, J.; Rieß, M.; Daab, M.; Suntinger, M.; Habel, C.; Bargel, H.; Hugenschmidt, C.; Rosenfeldt, S.; Breu, J. Structural insights into water-based spider silk protein–nanoclay composites with excellent gas and water vapor barrier properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 2016, 8, 25535–25543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Chen, P.; Xie, F.; McNally, T. Understanding the effects of montmorillonite and sepiolite on the properties of solution-cast chitosan and chitosan/silk peptide composite films. Polym. Int. 2021, 70, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, A.; Ling, C.; Sheng, R.; Li, X.; Yao, Q.; Chen, J. Enzymatically crosslinked silk-nanosilicate reinforced hydrogel with dual-lineage bioactivity for osteochondral tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 127, 112215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Kadumudi, F.B.; Jahanshahi, M.; Mehrali, M.; Zsurzsan, T.G.; Taebnia, N.; Hasany, M.; Mohanty, S.; Knott, A.; Godau, B.; Akbari, M.; et al. A Protein-Based, Water-Insoluble, and Bendable Polymer with Ionic Conductivity: A Roadmap for Flexible and Green Electronics. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1801241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Jawaid, M.; Chee, S.S.; Asim, M.; Saba, N.; Kalia, S. Sustainable kenaf/bamboo fibers/clay hybrid nanocomposites: Properties, environmental aspects and applications. J. Clean. Product. 2022, 330, 129938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Spencer, P.; Spares, R.; Sweeney, J.; Coates, P. Modelling the large strain solid phase deformation behaviour of polymer nanoclay composites. Mech. Time-Depen. Mater. 2008, 12, 313–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Shakrani, S.A.; Ayob, A.; Rahim, M.A.A. A review of nanoclay applications in the pervious concrete pavement. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1885, 020049. [Google Scholar]
  163. Shakrani, S.A.; Ayob, A.; Rahim, M.A.A. Applications of waste material in the pervious concrete pavement: A review. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1885, 020048. [Google Scholar]
  164. Elango, K.; Gopi, R.; Saravanakumar, R.; Rajeshkumar, V.; Vivek, D.; Raman, S.V. Properties of pervious concrete—A state of the art review. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 45, 2422–2425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Mansi, A.; Sor, N.H.; Hilal, N.; Qaidi, S.M. The impact of nano clay on normal and high-performance concrete characteristics: A review. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022, 961, 012085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Ramadhansyah, P.; Mohd Ibrahim, M.Y.; Hainin, M.R.; Warid, M.N.M.; Ibrahim, M.H. Porous concrete pavement containing nano-silica: Pre-review. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 911, 454–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Biswas, B.; Warr, L.N.; Hilder, E.F.; Goswami, N.; Rahman, M.M.; Churchman, J.G.; Vasilev, K.; Pan, G.; Naidu, R. Biocompatible functionalisation of nanoclays for improved environmental remediation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 3740–3770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Soleimani, M.; Amini, N. Remediation of Environmental Pollutants Using Nanoclays: Nanoscience and Plant–Soil Systems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 279–289. [Google Scholar]
  169. Lu, T.; Gou, H.; Rao, H.; Zhao, G. Recent progress in nanoclay-based Pickering emulsion and applications. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Li, W.; Qamar, S.A.; Qamar, M.; Basharat, A.; Bilal, M.; Iqbal, H.M. Carrageenan-based nano-hybrid materials for the mitigation of hazardous environmental pollutants. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 190, 700–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Kataki, M.S.; Kakoti, B.B.; Deka, K.; Rajkumari, A. Nanotechnology Applications in Natural Nanoclays Production and Application for Better Sustainability. Sustain. Nanotechnol. Strateg. Prod. Appl. 2022, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Iravani, R.; An, C.; Adamian, Y.; Mohammadi, M. A Review on the Use of Nanoclay Adsorbents in Environmental Pollution Control. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2022, 233, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Floody, M.C.; Theng, B.; Reyes, P.; Mora, M. Natural nanoclays: Applications and future trends—A Chilean perspective. Clay Miner. 2009, 44, 161–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Vasilev, I.Y.; Ananev, V.; Sultanova, Y.M.; Kolpakova, V. The Influence of the Composition of Polyethylene, Starch, and Monoglyceride Biodegradable Compositions on Their Physicomechanical Properties and Structure. Polym. Sci. Ser. D 2022, 15, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Pan, Y.; Farmahini-Farahani, M.; OHearn, P.; Xiao, H.; Ocampo, H. An overview of bio-based polymers for packaging materials. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 2016, 1, 106–113. [Google Scholar]
  176. Emblem, A. Plastics Properties for Packaging Materials: Packaging Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 287–309. [Google Scholar]
  177. Akter, T.; Hossain, M.S. Application of plant fibers in environmental friendly composites for developed properties: A review. Clean. Mater. 2021, 2, 100032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Singh, R.; Sharma, R.; Shaqib, M.; Sarkar, A.; Chauhan, K.D. Biodegradable Polymers as Packaging Materials: Biopolymers and Their Industrial Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 245–259. [Google Scholar]
  179. Wróblewska-Krepsztul, J.; Rydzkowski, T.; Borowski, G.; Szczypiński, M.; Klepka, T.; Thakur, V.K. Recent progress in biodegradable polymers and nanocomposite-based packaging materials for sustainable environment. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. 2018, 23, 383–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Goel, P.; Arora, R.; Haleem, R.; Shukla, S.K. Advances in Bio-degradable Polymer Composites-Based Packaging Material. Chem. Afr. 2022, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Najeeb, J.; Naeem, S. Biodegradable Food Packaging Materials: Handbook of Biodegradable Materials; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  182. Kumar, M.; Panjagari, N.R.; Kanade, P.P.; Singh, A.K.; Badola, R.; Ganguly, S.; Behare, P.V.; Sharma, R.; Alam, T. Sodium caseinate-starch-modified montmorillonite based biodegradable film: Laboratory food extruder assisted exfoliation and characterization. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2018, 15, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Garusinghe, U.M.; Varanasi, S.; Raghuwanshi, V.S.; Garnier, G.; Batchelor, W. Nanocellulose-montmorillonite composites of low water vapour permeability. Coll. Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018, 540, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Shori, S.; Chen, X.; Peralta, M.; Gao, H.; zur Loye, H.C.; Ploehn, H.J. Effect of interfacial pretreatment on the properties of montmorillonite/poly (vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. David, P.P., Jr. Review on the preparation, structure and property relation of clay-based polymer nanocomposites. KIMIKA 2017, 28, 44–56. [Google Scholar]
  186. Aulin, C.; Salazar-Alvarez, G.; Lindström, T. High strength, flexible and transparent nanofibrillated cellulose–nanoclay biohybrid films with tunable oxygen and water vapor permeability. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 6622–6628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Farmahini-Farahani, M.; Bedane, A.H.; Pan, Y.; Xiao, H.; Eic, M.; Chibante, F. Cellulose/nanoclay composite films with high water vapor resistance and mechanical strength. Cellulose 2015, 22, 3941–3953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. de Souza, A.G.; Dos Santos, N.M.A.; da Silva Torin, R.F.; dos Santos Rosa, D. Synergic antimicrobial properties of Carvacrol essential oil and montmorillonite in biodegradable starch films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 1737–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Gaharwar, A.K.; Cross, L.M.; Peak, C.W.; Gold, K.; Carrow, J.K.; Brokesh, A.; Singh, K.A. 2D nanoclay for biomedical applications: Regenerative medicine, therapeutic delivery, and additive manufacturing. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1900332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Peña-Parás, L.; Sánchez-Fernández, J.A.; Vidaltamayo, R. Nanoclays for biomedical applications. In Handbook of Ecomaterials; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 5, pp. 3453–3471. [Google Scholar]
  191. Gebeshuber, I.C. Biomimetic Nanotechnology Vol. 2. Biomimetics 2022, 7, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Nilforoushzadeh, M.A.; Amirkhani, M.A.; Seirafianpour, F.; Pakbaz, Y.; Zare, S.; Goodarzi, A. Regenerative Medicine in Dermatology. J. Skin Stem Cell 2022, 9, e124222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Jafari, A.; Ajji, Z.; Mousavi, A.; Naghieh, S.; Bencherif, S.A.; Savoji, H. Latest Advances in 3D Bioprinting of Cardiac Tissues. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2022, 7, 2101636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Nouri, M.; Mokhtari, J.; Rostamloo, M. Electrospun poly (ɛ-caprolactone)/nanoclay nanofibrous mats for tissue engineering. Fibers Polym. 2013, 14, 957–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Balavigneswaran, C.K.; Muthuvijayan, V. Nanohybrid-Reinforced Gelatin-Ureidopyrimidinone-Based Self-healing Injectable Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2021, 4, 5362–5377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Molchanov, V.S.; Efremova, M.A.; Kiseleva, T.Y.; Philippova, O.G.E.E. Injectable ultra soft hydrogel with natural nanoclay. Нанoсистемы физика химия математика 2019, 10, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Mattausch, H. Properties and Applications of Nanoclay Composites: Polymer Nanoclay Composites; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 127–155. [Google Scholar]
  198. Ferrández-Rives, M.; Beltrán-Osuna, Á.A.; Gómez-Tejedor, J.A.; Gomez Ribelles, J.L. Electrospun PVA/bentonite nanocomposites mats for drug delivery. Materials 2017, 10, 1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Hsu, W.-H.; Chang, H.-M.; Lee, Y.-L.; Prasannan, A.; Hu, C.-C.; Wang, J.-S.; Lai, J.-Y.; Yang, J.M.; Jebaranjitham, N.; Tsai, H.-C. Biodegradable polymer-nanoclay composites as intestinal sleeve implants installed in digestive tract for obesity and type 2 diabetes treatment. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 110, 110676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Dana, K.; Sarkar, M. Organophilic Nature of Nanoclay: Clay Nanoparticles; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 117–138. [Google Scholar]
  201. Villalba-Rodríguez, A.M.; Martínez-González, S.; Sosa-Hernández, J.E.; Parra-Saldívar, R.; Bilal, M.; Iqbal, H.M. Nanoclay/Polymer-Based Hydrogels and Enzyme-Loaded Nanostructures for Wound Healing Applications. Gels 2021, 7, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Rezanejad Gatabi, Z.; Heshmati, N.; Mirhoseini, M.; Dabbaghianamiri, M. The Application of Clay-Based Nanocomposite Hydrogels in Wound Healing. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2022, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Bibi, S.; Mir, S.; Rehman, W.; Menaa, F.; Gul, A.; Alaryani, F.S.S.; Alqahtani, A.M.; Haq, S.; Abdellatif, M.H. Synthesis and In Vitro/Ex Vivo Characterizations of Ceftriazone-Loaded Sodium Alginate/Poly (Vinyl Alcohol) Clay Reinforced Nanocomposites: Possible Applications in Wound Healing. Materials 2022, 15, 3885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Asthana, N.; Pal, K.; Aljabali, A.A.; Tambuwala, M.M.; de Souza, F.G.; Pandey, K. Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) mixed green–clay and aloe vera based polymeric membrane optimization: Peel-off mask formulation for skin care cosmeceuticals in green nanotechnology. J. Mol. Struct. 2021, 1229, 129592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Sabaa, M.W.; Abdallah, H.M.; Mohamed, N.A.; Mohamed, R.R. Synthesis, characterization and application of biodegradable crosslinked carboxymethyl chitosan/poly (vinyl alcohol) clay nanocomposites. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2015, 56, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Barage, S.; Lakkakula, J.; Sharma, A.; Roy, A.; Alghamdi, S.; Almehmadi, M.; Hossain, M.; Allahyani, M.; Abdulaziz, O. Nanomaterial in Food Packaging: A Comprehensive Review. J. Nanomater. 2022, 2022, 6053922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Moradihamedani, P. Recent development in polymer/montmorillonite clay mixed matrix membranes for gas separation: A short review. Polym. Bull. 2022, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Chen, B.; Evans, J.R.; Greenwell, H.C.; Boulet, P.; Coveney, P.V.; Bowden, A.A.; Whiting, A. A critical appraisal of polymer–clay nanocomposites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 568–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. LeBaron, P.C.; Wang, Z.; Pinnavaia, T.J. Polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites: An overview. Appl. Clay Sci. 1999, 15, 11–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Nourizadeh, H.; Bakhshayesh, A. Nanoclay-Based Products Across Global Markets. In StatNano Applied and Industrial Series: Nanoclay-Based Products Across Global Markets: Applications and Properties; StatNano Publications: Lund, Sweden, 2020; pp. 3–33. [Google Scholar]
  211. Gilman, J.W. Flammability and thermal stability studies of polymer layered-silicate (clay) nanocomposites. Appl. Clay Sci. 1999, 15, 31–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Beall, G.W.; Powell, C.E. Fundamentals of Polymer-Clay Nanocomposites; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  213. Kawasumi, M. The discovery of polymer-clay hybrids. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2004, 42, 819–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Lee, S.-R.; Park, H.-M.; Lim, H.; Kang, T.; Li, X.; Cho, W.-J.; Ha, C.-S. Microstructure, tensile properties, and biodegradability of aliphatic polyester/clay nanocomposites. Polymer 2002, 43, 2495–2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Avella, M.; De Vlieger, J.J.; Errico, M.E.; Fischer, S.; Vacca, P.; Volpe, M.G. Biodegradable starch/clay nanocomposite films for food packaging applications. Food Chem. 2005, 93, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Aysa, N.H.; Shalan, A.E. Green Nanocomposites: Magical Solution for Environmental Pollution Problems: Advances in Nanocomposite Materials for Environmental and Energy Harvesting Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 389–417. [Google Scholar]
  217. Niroumand, H.; Zain, M.; Alhosseini, S.N. The influence of nano-clays on compressive strength of earth bricks as sustainable materials. Proced-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013, 89, 862–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Khan, S.H. Green Nanotechnology for the Environment and Sustainable Development: Green Materials for Wastewater Treatment; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 13–46. [Google Scholar]
Minerals 12 01495 g001 550
Figure 1. Structure of nanoclay (montmorillonite) [44]. Reproduced with permission from Springer.
Figure 1. Structure of nanoclay (montmorillonite) [44]. Reproduced with permission from Springer.
Minerals 12 01495 g001
Minerals 12 01495 g002 550
Figure 2. Entrapment of ions in layered nanosilicate nanostructure.
Figure 2. Entrapment of ions in layered nanosilicate nanostructure.
Minerals 12 01495 g002
Minerals 12 01495 g003 550
Figure 3. Formation of polymer/layered silicate nanostructure via intercalation and exfoliation.
Figure 3. Formation of polymer/layered silicate nanostructure via intercalation and exfoliation.
Minerals 12 01495 g003
Minerals 12 01495 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic of transparent nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) monolayer/nanoclay nanoplatelet-based hybrid films with self-extinguishing behavior (90% transparency at 600 nm). One-dimensional nanofibrillated cellulose was extracted from wood pulp through mechanical and chemical treatments and mixed with uniformly dispersed nanoclay nanoplatelets in water. The nanofibrillated cellulose dispersed monolayer clay nanoplatelets suspension was blended with 0.5 wt.% clay nanoplatelet suspension using mechanical stirring and ultra-sonication methods. Water evaporation induced self-assembly was used to prepare a highly transparent NFC-monolayer clay nanoplatelet hybrid film with superb self-extinguishing effect [113]. Reproduced with permission from ACS.
Figure 4. Schematic of transparent nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) monolayer/nanoclay nanoplatelet-based hybrid films with self-extinguishing behavior (90% transparency at 600 nm). One-dimensional nanofibrillated cellulose was extracted from wood pulp through mechanical and chemical treatments and mixed with uniformly dispersed nanoclay nanoplatelets in water. The nanofibrillated cellulose dispersed monolayer clay nanoplatelets suspension was blended with 0.5 wt.% clay nanoplatelet suspension using mechanical stirring and ultra-sonication methods. Water evaporation induced self-assembly was used to prepare a highly transparent NFC-monolayer clay nanoplatelet hybrid film with superb self-extinguishing effect [113]. Reproduced with permission from ACS.
Minerals 12 01495 g004
Minerals 12 01495 g005 550
Figure 5. Time-lapse flammability of (left) pure nanofibrillated cellulose film and (right) transparent hybrid film with 50 wt.% monolayer clay nanoplatelet, respectively [113]. Reproduced with permission from ACS.
Figure 5. Time-lapse flammability of (left) pure nanofibrillated cellulose film and (right) transparent hybrid film with 50 wt.% monolayer clay nanoplatelet, respectively [113]. Reproduced with permission from ACS.
Minerals 12 01495 g005
Minerals 12 01495 g006 550
Figure 6. Variation in flexural modulus vs, laser power for poly(lactic acid) and poly(lactic acid)/montmorillonite nanoclay nanocomposite (powder bed temperature 60 °C) [138]. Reproduced with permission from Wiley.
Figure 6. Variation in flexural modulus vs, laser power for poly(lactic acid) and poly(lactic acid)/montmorillonite nanoclay nanocomposite (powder bed temperature 60 °C) [138]. Reproduced with permission from Wiley.
Minerals 12 01495 g006
Minerals 12 01495 g007 550
Figure 7. Applications of green polymer/nanoclay nanocomposite.
Figure 7. Applications of green polymer/nanoclay nanocomposite.
Minerals 12 01495 g007
Minerals 12 01495 g008 550
Figure 8. Mechanism of MMT stacking and arrangement of stacks in nanocellulose network. (a) MMT stack formation at high loading level which decrease the tortuous path; (b) MMT stacks broken down using high-pressure homogenization of nanocellulose/MMT suspension which increase the tortuous path [183]. MMT = montmorillonite. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 8. Mechanism of MMT stacking and arrangement of stacks in nanocellulose network. (a) MMT stack formation at high loading level which decrease the tortuous path; (b) MMT stacks broken down using high-pressure homogenization of nanocellulose/MMT suspension which increase the tortuous path [183]. MMT = montmorillonite. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Minerals 12 01495 g008
Minerals 12 01495 g009 550
Figure 9. WVP of nanocellulose/MMT nanocomposites. The pristine nanocomposite sheets; nanocomposite sheets with high pressure homogenization step, and sonication step [183]. WVP = water vapor permeability; MMT = montmorillonite. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 9. WVP of nanocellulose/MMT nanocomposites. The pristine nanocomposite sheets; nanocomposite sheets with high pressure homogenization step, and sonication step [183]. WVP = water vapor permeability; MMT = montmorillonite. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Minerals 12 01495 g009
Table
Table 1. Comparative properties of nanoclays and alumina silicate particles.
Table 1. Comparative properties of nanoclays and alumina silicate particles.
PropertiesNanoclayAlumina Silicate
StructurePlatelets or layeredParticles
Cation exchange capabilityHigh due to layered structureNo cation exchange ability
Plastic behaviorUpon wettingNo plasticity
Swelling behaviorHigh on wettingNo swelling
PermeabilityLowHigh
Catalytic abilitiesHighLow
Dimensional stabilityLowHigh
Dielectric/thermal insulationLowHigh
Resistance to thermal impactsLowHigh
Chemical stabilityLowHigh
Heat resistantLow1300 °C
Application in metal platingNoYes
Table
Table 3. Recent survey on synthetic polymer/clay nanocomposite.
Table 3. Recent survey on synthetic polymer/clay nanocomposite.
MatrixNanoclayPropertiesRef
PolystyreneMontmorillonite;
Bentonite
  • Thermal stability
  • Non-flammability
  • Mechanical properties
  • Barrier properties
  • Morphology variation
  • Barrier properties
  • Low water permeability
  • Low gas permeability
[60,61,62]
Polyethylene (low and high density)Montmorillonite[63,64,65,66]
PolypropyleneMontmorillonite[67,68,69]
PolyamideMontmorillonite[70,71,72]
Poly(methyl methacrylate)Montmorillonite;
halloysite nanoclay		[73,74,75,76]
PolyanilineMontmorillonite;
kaolinite;
bentonite		[77,78]
PolypyrroleMontmorillonite[79]
Table
Table 4. Property/application of various nanoclay types with green polymers.
Table 4. Property/application of various nanoclay types with green polymers.
MontmorilloniteCloisiteHalloysite NanotubeApplication of Nanoclays with Green Polymers
Thermal stabilityHeat resistanceThermal stabilityMontmorillonite and halloysite nanoclay in cellulose and starch matrices for electrical, magnetic, and optical devices
Mechanical strength Mechanical stabilityStrength propertiesMontmorillonite and halloysite nanoclay based green nanomaterials for drug delivery/tissue engineering
Gas permeabilityDimensional stabilityFlame retardanceCellulose and starch with montmorillonite for antimicrobials
Barrier propertiesRheological propertiesAnticorrosion coatingsCloisite in natural rubber for civil structures
Wastewater treatmentThickener in lubrication oilsWastewater treatmentMontmorillonite and halloysite nanoclay in cellulose and starch for packaging
Table
Table 5. Specifications of green nanocomposite systems for technical fields.
Table 5. Specifications of green nanocomposite systems for technical fields.
PolymerNanofillerProcessingProperty/ApplicationRef
WoodMontmorilloniteSolution/melt methodSustainable construction materials[206]
Cellulose, starch, poly(lactic acid)MontmorilloniteSolution/melt methodPackaging[180,181,182]
NanocelluloseMontmorillonite
16.7–23.1 wt.%		Solution methodLow water vapor permeability 6.3–13.3 g·μm/m2·day·kPa;
packaging		[183]
Nanocellulose nanofiberVermiculite nanoclaySolution methodOxygen permeability 0.07 cm3μm·m−2d−1kPa−1 at 50% relative humidity;
packaging		[186]
CelluloseMontmorilloniteSolution methodLow water vapor transmission rate 43 g/m2/day;
packaging		[187]
StarchMontmorilloniteSolution methodAntimicrobial effect against E. coli bacterial strain[188]
Poly(ɛ-caprolactone)MontmorilloniteElectrospinningTissue engineering;
better cell adhesion and bioactivity		[194]
Poly-(DL-lactic acid)LaponiteSolution methodDrug delivery;
Type-2 diabetes curation		[199]
Poly(vinyl alcohol)MontmorilloniteSolution methodWound healing;
penicillin drug to wounds		[203]
Poly(vinyl alcohol)MontmorilloniteSolution methodWound healing;
high microbiological stability		[204]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kausar, A.; Ahmad, I.; Maaza, M.; Eisa, M.H. State-of-the-Art Nanoclay Reinforcement in Green Polymeric Nanocomposite: From Design to New Opportunities. Minerals 2022, 12, 1495. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12121495

AMA Style

Kausar A, Ahmad I, Maaza M, Eisa MH. State-of-the-Art Nanoclay Reinforcement in Green Polymeric Nanocomposite: From Design to New Opportunities. Minerals. 2022; 12(12):1495. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12121495

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kausar, Ayesha, Ishaq Ahmad, Malik Maaza, and M.H. Eisa. 2022. "State-of-the-Art Nanoclay Reinforcement in Green Polymeric Nanocomposite: From Design to New Opportunities" Minerals 12, no. 12: 1495. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12121495

APA Style

Kausar, A., Ahmad, I., Maaza, M., & Eisa, M. H. (2022). State-of-the-Art Nanoclay Reinforcement in Green Polymeric Nanocomposite: From Design to New Opportunities. Minerals, 12(12), 1495. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12121495

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop