Next Article in Journal
Silicas Chemically Modified with Sulfur-Containing Groups for Separation and Preconcentration of Precious Metals Followed by Spectrometric Determination
Next Article in Special Issue
Zircons from Collisional Granites, Garhwal Himalaya, NW India: U–Th–Pb Age, Geochemistry and Protolith Constraints
Previous Article in Journal
The Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage Using Vertically Flowing Wetland: Insights into the Fate of Chemical Species
Previous Article in Special Issue
Petrogenesis of the Microgranular Enclaves and Their Host Granites from the Xitian Intrusion in South China: Implications for Geodynamic Setting and Mineralization
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Minerals
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/min11050480
minerals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Zircon U-Pb and Pyrite Re-Os Isotope Geochemistry of ‘Skarn-Type’ Fe-Cu Mineralization at the Shuikoushan Polymetallic Deposit, South China: Implications for an Early Cretaceous Mineralization Event in the Nanling Range

by
Shengbin Li
1,
Yonghua Cao
2,3,*,
Zeyou Song
4,5,* and
Dan Xiao
4,5
1
Key Laboratory of High-Temperature and High-Pressure Study of the Earth’s Interior, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550081, China
2
Key Laboratory of Metallogenic Prediction of Nonferrous Metals and Geological Environment Monitoring, Ministry of Education, School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
3
Key Laboratory of Mineralogy and Metallogeny, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China
4
Key Laboratory of Hunan Province for Remote Sensing Monitoring of Ecological Environment in Dongting Lake Area, Center for Natural Resources Affairs of Hunan Province, Changsha 410114, China
5
Hunan Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Utilization, Hunan Land and Resources Planning Institute, Changsha 410007, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2021, 11(5), 480; https://doi.org/10.3390/min11050480
Submission received: 12 March 2021 / Revised: 16 April 2021 / Accepted: 27 April 2021 / Published: 30 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue U-Pb Dating and Chemistry of Zircon in Metamorphic, Magmatic and Sedimentary Rocks)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The Shuikoushan deposit is an economic ‘skarn-type’ polymetallic Pb-Zn deposit in South China. The deposit is located at the southern margin of the Hengyang basin in the northern part of the Nanling Range. Recently, economic Fe-Cu mineralization that occurs spatially connected to skarns along the contact zone between the granodiorite and limestones was discovered in the lower part of this deposit. Detailed zircon U-Pb geochronological data indicate that the granodiorite was emplaced at 153.7 ± 0.58 Ma (Mean Square of Weighted Deviates (MSWD) = 2.4). However, the pyrite Re-Os isochron age reveals that Fe-Cu mineralization formed at 140 ± 11 Ma (MSWD) = 8.1), which post-dates the emplacement of the granodiorite, as well as the previously determined timing of Pb-Zn mineralization (157.8 ± 1.4 Ma) in this deposit. Considering that Fe-Cu mineralization was connected with the contact zone and also faults, and that sulfide minerals commonly occur together with quartz and calcite veins that crosscut skarns, we interpret this mineralization type as being related to injection of post-magmatic hydrothermal fluids. The timing of Fe-Cu mineralization (140 ± 11 Ma) is inconsistent with a long-held viewpoint that the time interval of 145 to 130 Ma (e.g., Early Cretaceous) in the Nanling Range is a period of magmatic quiescence with insignificant mineralization, the age of 140 Ma may represent a new mineralization event in the Nanling Range.

1. Introduction

The Shuikoushan Pb-Zn-Au ore field, located at the northwestern margin of the Cathaysian block (Figure 1a) and the middle part of the Nanling Range in South China, is one of the most important non-ferrous ore fields in China. The main mineral deposits in this ore field include the Shuikoushan Pb-Zn polymetallic deposit, the Kangjiawan Pb-Zn deposit, the Longwangshan Au deposit, and the Xianrenyan Au deposit (Figure 1b). The geological and geochemical characteristics of the ore deposits in this ore field have been investigated by numerous studies, and two general genetic models such as skarn-type related to contact metamorphism and hydrothermal vein-type, which resulted by infilling hydrothermal fluids into fractures have been proposed to account for their formations [1,2,3,4,5].
The Shuikoushan deposit is an economic ‘skarn-type’ polymetallic Pb-Zn deposit, with an average grade of 1.57 wt. % Pb, 5.72 wt. % Zn, and 0.50 wt. % Cu [6]. Previous studies conducted on this deposit have focused on geochemical characteristics and genesis of Pb-Zn mineralization. For example, based on geological mapping and zircon U-Pb geochronological work, Pb-Zn mineralization in this deposit was found to be spatially related to granodiorites that have zircon U-Pb ages ranging from 153 to 163 Ma (Table 1) [1,2,3,7,8,9]. Re-Os isochron age of the molybdenite from the Pb-Zn ore body of this deposit reveals that the timing of Pb-Zn mineralization is 157.8 ± 1.4 Ma, coinciding with the age of granodiorites in this deposit [9]. It is thought that Pb-Zn mineralization and granodiorites in the Shuikoushan deposit are genetically linked [9]. Recently, the drilling program made the discovery of the No. 3 concealed granodiorite and a spatially related Fe-Cu ore body at depths from −295 to −1050 m in this deposit (Figure 2). The discovery enlarges the mineral reserve and indicates a potential for prospecting other resources in the Shuikoushan deposit [4]. In addition, the Mesozoic granitoids in the Nanling Range are known to host Pb-Zn-W-Sn as the dominant mineralization types [10,11], the discovery of the Fe-Cu ore body in the Shuikoushan deposit may enrich the mineralization diversity in the Nanling Range. Albeit these significant meanings, the research on Fe-Cu mineralization in this deposit is still at a very initial stage. It is unclear whether the No. 3 granodiorite is co-genetic with other granodiorites in the Shuikoushan deposit and formed contemporaneously with Fe-Cu mineralization, and what is the genesis of Fe-Cu mineralization. In addition, the granitoid magmatism and related Pb-Zn-W-Sn mineralization events in the Nanling Range were determined to have occurred mainly between 151 and 160 Ma [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19], coeval with Pb-Zn mineralization in the Shuikoushan deposit [9]. It is unclear whether or not Fe-Cu mineralization in this deposit is also coeval with mineralization events in the Nanling Range. Investigating this may provide implications for discovering similar types of mineralization in a much broader region. To address these problems, the emplacement age of the No. 3 granodiorite and the timing of Fe-Cu mineralization needs to be constrained.
In this study, U-Pb zircon dating of the No. 3 concealed granodiorite was performed to constrain the emplacement age of this intrusion. Re-Os isotope system is known to be a powerful tool for dating sulfide minerals [21,22], thus the timing of Fe-Cu mineralization can be determined based on this method. Although the molybdenite is commonly used for Re-Os isotopic dating, it has been demonstrated that sulfide minerals with lower Re and Os concentrations such as pyrite and arsenopyrite are also suitable for Re-Os isotopic dating, and the Re-Os radiogenic system of pyrite can be used as a high-precision geochronometer [23,24]. As the Fe-Cu ore body in the Shuikoushan deposit contains abundant pyrite but lacks molybdenite, we carried out the pyrite Re-Os isochron dating to determine the timing of Fe-Cu mineralization in this study. The obtained ages are combined with whole-rock trace element compositions and trace element and Hf isotope compositions of zircons to evaluate the relationship between the No. 3 granodiorite and other granodioritic intrusions in the Shuikoushan deposit, the potential linkage between the No. 3 granodiorite and Fe-Cu mineralization, and the genesis of this mineralization type.

2. Regional Geological Setting

The Nanling Range in South China contains abundant Mesozoic granitoid intrusions that host significant metallic mineralization [25,26]. These intrusions were previously considered as S-type granitoids based on their relatively high initial Sr87/Sr86 ratios of 0.710–0.735 [25,27], but were then re-identified as I- or A-type granitoids formed from highly fractionated magmas [28,29]. Particularly, recent studies identified several small granodioritic intrusions with relatively low initial Sr87/Sr86 ratios in the Range and regarded this as an I-type signature for the intrusions [9,30]. Mesozoic granitoids in Southern Hunan are hosts to numerous W-Sn and Pb-Zn ore deposits, which form a significant part of mineralization in the Nanling Range. Among which, W-Sn deposits are commonly related to granite plutons emplaced at 160 to 150 Ma [15,31,32,33], whereas Pb-Zn deposits are usually associated with I-type granodiorite intrusions [34,35].
The Shuikoushan ore field in Southern Hunan is located in the suture zone between the Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks. The basement of this ore field consists of Precambrian metamorphic rocks that were overlain by Sinian to Mesozoic cover sedimentary successions [2,36]. The strata in this field are composed mainly by the Late Triassic marine carbonate and Late Triassic to Cretaceous clastic molasses Formations. Structures in the ore field consist mainly of anticline and syncline that have nearly north-south axial direction, as well as some thrust faults that strike nearly from north to south [2].
Seventy-two igneous bodies that cover a total surface area of ~4.5 km2 have been discovered in this ore field. The lithology of these igneous bodies consists mainly of granodiorite and granite porphyry. The Yagongtang and Laoyachao granodiorites are two relatively large igneous bodies in the ore field, both intruded the Yagongtang inverted anticline [3]. The Yanshannian subvolcanic complex (133.9 to 199.6 Ma), composed mainly of dacite porphyry, andesitic tuff, rhyolite, and flow breccia, is also exposed in this ore field [37]. It is thought that Pb, Zn, and Au mineralization in this ore field is closely spatially related to the intermediate-felsic rocks of the Yanshannian subvolcanic complex [6].

3. Ore Deposit Geology

The Shuikoushan polymetallic deposit is located in the center of the Shuikoushan ore field (Figure 1b). The eastern part of this deposit is adjacent to the Kangjiawan Pb-Zn deposit and the western part is adjacent to the Longwangshan Au deposit (Figure 1b). The main strata in the mining area comprise: (1) the Middle-Upper Carboniferous (Moscovian) dolomites and limestones of the Hutian Formation, (2) the Lower Permian limestone of the Qixia Formation, (3) the Lower Permian muddy, siliceous rock and marlstone of the Dangchong Formation, (4) the Upper Permian Carbonaceous shale and sandstone of the Douling Formation, (5) the Lower Cretaceous purple-red calcareous fine-grained sandstone, siltstone, and shale of the Dongjing Formation, and (6) the Quaternary sediments. Structures in this deposit include a series of nearly N–S trending folds and faults, notably the Laoyachao and Yagongtang overturned anticlines, and a large scale thrust fault named the Shiao-Kangjiawan fault (F22).
The granodioritic intrusion in this deposit was subdivided into numerous bodies by local miners, among which, No. 2, No. 3, and No. 4 are the main ones. No. 2 and No. 4 granodiorites are exposed and located at the western and eastern sides of the deposit, respectively, separated by a fault, whereas the No. 3 granodiorite is concealed and was discovered based on the drilling program (Figure 2a). The three rock bodies cover an area of ~2.7 km2 in total and occur as lopolith and laccolith, which intruded the overturned anticline and/or fault (Figure 2a,b) [37]. The deposit contains two main mineralization types, such as Pb-Zn and Fe-Cu. Pb-Zn mineralization occurs dominantly along the margins of the No. 2 and No. 4 granodiorites, with minor within the (siliceous) marlstone of the Dangchong Formation. In contrast, Fe-Cu mineralization occurs along the eastern margin of the concealed No. 3 granodiorite (Figure 2b). There are also several thin lenses of Au mineralization found along the contact between the No. 4 granodiorite and fractured limestone (Figure 2a), details about Au mineralization can be referred to [6]. Various types of hydrothermal alteration, including chloritization, sericitization, skarnization, silicification, marbleization and hornfelization, are widespread along the contact zone between the granodiorites and country rocks. Among them, the skarnization and silicification are spatially related to Pb-Zn and Fe-Cu mineralization, whereas the chloritization is spatially related to Au mineralization [6].
Pb-Zn mineralization in the Shuikoushan deposit has been described in detail by previous studies [1,2,3,7,8,9]—only a brief description is given here. Fourteen lenticular and podiform-like Pb-Zn ore bodies were discovered, the occurrence of which is basically controlled by the contact zone between the No. 2 and No. 4 granodiorites and country rocks (e.g., the limestone of the Qixia and Huitian Formations), and include the hydrothermal vein-type, the cryptoexplosive breccia-type, and the skarn-type. Ore minerals consist mainly of galena, sphalerite, pyrite, native Au, with small amounts of pyrrhotite, hematite, arsenopyrite, chalcopyrite, bornite, chalcocite, argentite, molybdenite, and native Ag. Gangue minerals are calcite, quartz, garnet, diopside, wollastonite, epidote, apatite, with small amounts of feldspar, fluorite, and barite. According to the exploration report [6], the average content of the Pb-Zn ore body is 1.66 wt. % Pb and 6.95 wt. % Zn.
Fe-Cu mineralization in the Shuikoushan deposit is spatially related to skarns that occurred along the eastern contact zone between the No. 3 granodiorite and country rocks (e.g., the limestone of the Qixia Formation and the marlstone of the Dangchong Formation) (Figure 2b and Figure 3a–c). The ore body of this mineralization type is buried at depth between −295 to −1050 m and can be termed as a ‘blind’ ore body (Figure 2b). The ore body is ~1200 m long along the strike, up to ~700 m long toward the dipping direction, and 3.68 to 175.87 m (30. 58 m on average) in thickness. The ore body is dominantly cylindrical, lenticular, sack-like, and stratified in shapes, but locally it can occur as veins within fissures of metamorphic rocks (Figure 3a,b). The occurrence of the ore body was controlled by the contact zone and faults and varies at different positions relative to the contact zone. For example, the ore body on the eastern side of the contact zone has a NW strike and dips to SW with a dipping angle of 55 to 70 degrees. In contrast, the ‘lense-shaped’ ore body located on the northern side of the contact zone has a NS or NNE strike and dips to SW with a dipping angle of 80 to 85 degrees for the upper part of the ore body and 50 to 60 degrees for the lower part of the ore body (Figure 2b). The average content is 22.2 wt. % Fe, 0.62 wt. % Cu, 0.3 ppm Au, and 9.35 ppm Ag [6]. Ore minerals consist mainly of magnetite, pyrite, chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite, galena, and sphalerite, with trace amounts of molybdenite and native Ag, which are mainly anhedral to subhedral and show complex replacement and crosscutting relationships (Figure 4a–k). Gangue minerals are garnet, diopside, quartz, calcite, chlorite, and epidote.

4. Paragenetic Sequence of Fe-Cu Mineralization

Based on crosscutting relationships of ore and gangue minerals, as well as textures of ore minerals, paragenetic sequence of Fe-Cu mineralization was determined, which comprises two main episodes. From the oldest to the youngest, they are the skarn episode and the quartz-sulfide episode (Figure 5). The skarn episode refers to the calcareous skarn that comprises anhydrous silicate minerals such as garnet and diopside, hydrous silicate minerals such as epidote and chlorite, as well as a high amount of magnetite (Figure 5). Epidote, chlorite, and magnetite commonly occur together, which either crosscuts or replaces the garnet and diopisde (Figure 4a), based on which, the skarn episode was further subdivided into the garnet-diopside skarn and magnetite stages (Figure 5). The quartz-sulfide episode is characterized by abundant sulfide minerals, which include pyrite, chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite, sphalerite, and galena. Sulfide minerals commonly occur together with hydrothermal quartz and calcite veins (Figure 4b–e), and either crosscut the magnetite (Figure 4b–d,g) or replaced the garnet-diopside skarn (Figure 4f). This affirms that the quartz-sulfide episode occurred later than the skarn episode. Textures such as the replacement of massive pyrite by galena and sphalerite, chalcopyrite inclusion in sphalerite, and the replacement of chalcopyrite by sphalerite that resulted in the ‘chalcopyrite disease’ texture (Figure 4h–k) are all evidence that the galena-sphalerite assemblage formed later than the pyrite-chalcopyrite assemblage, and thus the quartz-sulfide episode was further subdivided into the pyrite-chalcopyrite and galena-sphalerite stages. The pyrite-chalcopyrite stage comprises pyrite, chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite. The galena-sphalerite stage comprises galena, sphalerite, and minor pyrite, as well as some gangue minerals such as quartz and a small amount of carbonates.

5. Sampling and Analytical Methods

5.1. Sample Collection

Ten samples of the No. 3 granodiorite were collected. The samples are medium- to coarse-grained and show porphyritic-like texture. They comprise a decreasing amount of plagioclase (22 to 28 modal%), orthoclase (19 to 23 modal%), quartz (20 to 30 modal%), hornblende (10 to 18 modal%), and biotite (8 to 18 modal%), with minor amounts of apatite and zircon. Each of the samples was cut into three parts; one part was pulverized into powders for whole-rock analysis, another part was made into polished thin sections for petrography, the last part was crushed and prepared for hand-picking zircon separates. Five pieces of Fe-Cu ores were also sampled in order to obtain pyrite separates for Re-Os isotopic analysis. Locations of the collected Fe-Cu ores are given in Table 2.

5.2. Analytical Methods

5.2.1. Whole-Rock Major and Trace Element Analysis

Powdered samples of the No. 3 granodiorite were sent to ALS Minerals-Chemex (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. for whole-rock analysis, using an Agilent 7700× inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). The powdered samples (~2 g) were mixed homogeneously with lithium borate and placed in a furnace at 1000 °C for melting. After that, the melt was cooled, dissolved with 100 mL of 4% nitric acid solution, and then analyzed by ICP-MS. Quality control was conducted based on ALS Chemex quality-control procedures that involve analyses on a wide array of standards, blanks, and duplicates (e.g., GBM 306-12, GBM 315-13, NCSDC 73303, OREAS 195) that were included with each batch of samples. The standard deviation of the standard is better than 3%. The precision is better than 5% for most elements. The obtained whole-rock major and trace element analytical results are given in Table 3.

5.2.2. U-Pb Dating and Trace Elements in Zircon

Based on petrographic observations, zircon grains were sorted using a combination of heavy liquid and magnetic separation techniques. Transparent, crack- and inclusion-free zircon grains with good crystal shapes were hand-picked and mounted in epoxy resin. After the resin was fully cured, the epoxy disc was polished until the zircon was exposed. Cathodoluminescence (CL) and back-scattered electron (BSE) images of zircon grains were obtained using a JEOL-JXA-8100 electron probe micro-analyzer at China Metallurgical Geology Bureau, aiming to characterize the internal textures of zircon grains and identify suitable targets for spot analyses. The operating conditions include an acceleration voltage of 15 kV and a beam current of 2 × 10−8 A. Nineteen zircon grains that are 100 to 180 μm long and 60 to 120 μm wide with an aspect ratio of 1.6 to 3.0 were analyzed. The CL images show that the analyzed zircons have typical oscillatory zoning textures (Figure 6).
Trace element compositions and U-Pb isotope ratios of zircons were acquired using a laser ablation inductively coupled-plasma spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) at China Metallurgical Geology Bureau. The Thermo Scientific XSeries 2 ICP-MS instrument was coupled to a Compex Pro 193 nm ArF excimer laser ablation system. The ablation pits are ~30 μm in diameter and ~40 μm in depth. The density of the laser energy was 8.5 J/cm2 and ablation frequency was 8 Hz. Helium gas was used as a carrier gas. Multiple spots per grain were analyzed to test both grain-to-grain and intra-grain variability. Standards were analyzed throughout the sequence to allow for drift correction. A NIST 610 silicate glass standard was used as a monitor standard for trace elements to assess the accuracy and precision of the runs. 90Zr was used as the internal standard assuming stoichiometric values for zircon, in order to calibrate the trace element concentrations of zircons. The obtained trace element compositions of zircons are tabulated in Table 4. The standard GJ-1 zircon (599.8 ± 4.5 Ma; [38]) was used for calibration of the acquired zircon U-Pb isotope ratios. The standard Plesovice zircon (337.13 ± 0.37 Ma; [39]) was treated as an unknown sample during analysis, in order to check the accuracy of the acquired zircon U-Pb isotope ratios. Off-line data reduction was carried out using the ICPMSDataCal software (version 11, the State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China) [40]. Concordia diagram and weighted mean calculations were performed using the ISOPLOT software [41]. The obtained zircon U-Pb geochronology results are tabulated in Table 5.

5.2.3. Zircon Lu-Hf Isotopes

In situ zircon Lu-Hf isotope analysis was performed using a Nu Plasma IImulticollector inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) equipped with a GeoLas 2005 laser ablation system (MC-ICPMS) at Nanjing FocuMS Technology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). Analyses were performed on the pits ablated for previous U-Pb isotope analysis. The ablation pits are ~50 μm in diameter and ~40 μm in depth, with ablation time of 40 s and repetition rate of 8 Hz. Five standard zircons (GJ-1, 91500, Plešovice, Mud Tank, Penglai) were analyzed between every 10 samples to monitor the reproducibility of the zircon Hf isotopic data. The average 176Lu/177Hf for GJ-1 is 0.282008 ± 0.000025 (2σ standard deviation (SD)), for 91,500 is 0.282307 ± 0.000031, for Plešovice is 0.282482 ± 0.000013, for Mud Tank is 0.282504 ± 0.000044, and for Penglai is 0.282906 ± 0.000010 [39,42,43,44]. Raw count rates for 172Yb, 173Yb, 175Lu, 176(Hf + Yb + Lu), 177Hf, 178Hf, 179Hf, 180Hf, and 182W were measured, and isobaric interference corrections for 176Lu and 176Yb on 176Hf were made, details were given in Ref. [45]. The off-line processing of analytical data was performed using ICPMSDataCal software, including the selection of samples and blank signals and the correction of isotope mass fractionation [40]. The obtained zircon Hf isotopic compositions are tabulated in Table 6.

5.2.4. Pyrite Re-Os Dating

Pyrite Re-Os isotope analysis was carried out using a Triton thermal ionization mass spectrometer (TIMS) at the State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences. ~0.1 to 0.8 g sample powder (spiked with 185Re and 190Os), 2.5 mL concentrated HCl and 7.5 mL concentrated HNO3 were frozen in Carius tubes, which were sealed and heated to 240 °C for 24 to 48 h. After decomposition and cooling, the Carius tubes were opened and centrifuged and the supernatant was transferred to a 30 mL PFA flask. Osmium was separated using 4 mL CCl4 solvent extraction and back extraction following the HBr method of [48]. The residual solution underwent anion exchange through a column for Re extraction.
Isotope abundances in OsO3− (mass numbers: 233, 235, 236, 237, 238, 240) was measured using the secondary electron multiplier (SEM) dynamic jumping method. The results were acquired using the stepwise deoxidation method, i.e., using the isothermal model for oxygen calibration, and then, the mass fractionation was calibrated using 192Os/188Os = 3.08271 [49]. Finally, the dilution of the diluent was calculated to determine the contribution of the 187Os/188Os to the sample. Re contents were obtained using an Xseries-2 inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer. The results were corrected using the Re and Os blanks. Specific dating methods and procedures were described in [3,50,51]. The obtained pyrite Re-Os isotopic compositions are tabulated in Table 7.

6. Results

6.1. Whole-Rock Major and Trace Element Compositions of the No. 3 Granodiorite

Rocks have SiO2, K2O, and Na2O contents ranging from 55.8 to 62.3 wt.%, 2.4 to 4.2 wt.%, and 2.9 to 3.1 wt.%, respectively (Table 3). On plots of K2O versus SiO2 and A/CNK versus A/NK, rocks are plotted mainly in the shoshonite-high-K calc-alkaline field and the metaluminous field, respectively (Figure 7a,b). Rocks have total rare earth element (REE) contents ranging from 200 to 260 ppm, and display patterns of enrichment of light REE (LREE, 161 to 215 ppm) relative to heavy REE (HREE, 36 to 56 ppm) (Table 3, Figure 8a). In terms of Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* = (Eu)N/[(Sm)N × (Gd)N]0.5), except for one sample that displayed a negative Eu anomaly (Eu/Eu* = 0.76), all show no obvious Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* = 0.84 to 0.98) (Figure 8a). In addition, rocks all display pronounced Nb and Ta negative anomalies relative to large ion lithophile elements (LILE, e.g., Rb and K) and LREE (e.g., La) (Figure 8b). In general, rocks of the No. 3 granodiorite have similar REE and trace element patterns with other granodiorites in the Shuikoushan deposit (Figure 8a,b), except that the latter show obvious negative Sr anomalies due to the early fractionation of plagioclase (Figure 8b).

6.2. Rare Earth Element and Ti Contents of Zircons

Zircon grains (n = 19) have total REE in the range of 373.5 to 1230.6 ppm (678.6 ppm on average), with LREE/HREE of 0.02:0.31 on average. The europium anomaly and cerium anomaly (Ce/Ce* = (Ce)N/[(La)N × (Nd)N]0.5) are 0.45 to 0.55 and 1.12 to 159.13, respectively. Zircon grains have Ti contents ranging in the range of 0.2 to 5.5 ppm (Table 4). Based on the Ti-in-zircon thermometer of [53], the zircon crystallization temperature is estimated to be 547 to 782 °C. It is noted that the No. 10 zircon grain likely contains rutile micro-inclusions, as this grain contains anomalously high Ti contents (45.2 ppm) and has crystallization temperature of up to ~900 °C (Table 4).

6.3. Zircon U-Pb Geochronology

Zircon grains (n = 19) have Th and U concentrations in the range of 108 to 567 ppm (257 ppm on average), and 195 to 614 ppm (349 ppm on average), respectively. Their Th/U varies from 0.44 to 0.94 (0.72 on average) (Table 5). When ignoring the No. 10 zircon that may contain rutile micro-inclusions, they have 206Pb/238U ages of ca. 147 to ca. 165 Ma. Most of the ages are clustered within the range of ca. 151 to ca. 157 Ma (Figure 9a,b, Table 5). It is noted that three zircon grains (No. 09, 14, and 16) have much older ages (ca. 162 to ca. 165 Ma) than ages of the rest (ca. 147 to ca.159 Ma) (Figure 9a,b), and the age difference is obviously beyond the 1σ uncertainty of the obtained ages (Table 5). To better constrain the age of the No. 3 granodiorite, the three relatively old zircons were ignored in case that they are inherited in origin. On the U-Pb concordia diagram, data of the rest zircon grains are plotted basically on or close to the concordia line (Figure 9a). The concordia diagram yields a mean 206Pb/238U discordant age of 153.7 ± 0.58 Ma (1σ standard deviation, MSWD = 2.4) (n = 15, Figure 9a) [54]), consistent with the weighted average age of 154 ± 3.1 Ma (1σ standard deviation, MSWD = 2.1) (Figure 9b).

6.4. Zircon Hf Isotopic Compositions

Nineteen zircon grains were analyzed for Hf isotopes (Table 6), among which, three old zircons may be inherited in origin and are ignored in this section. The zircon 176Lu/177Hf and 176Hf/177Hf ranges from 0.001108 to 0.001729 (0.001483 on average), and 0.282406 to 0.282481 (0.282446 on average), respectively (Table 6). The zircon εHf(t) ranges from −9.6 to −7.0 (−8.3 on average). The two-stage model ages (TDM2) were calculated to be 1.64 to 1.81 Ga (1.72 Ga on average), similar to the age of the basement rocks in the Shuikoushan ore field [36].

6.5. Pyrite Re-Os Geochronology

The average Re and common Os contents of pyrite separates, plus with 2σ standard deviation, are in the range of 5.632 ± 0.125 to 26.898 ± 0.562 ppb, and 0.03028 ± 0.00006 to 0.05748 ± 0.00010 ppb, respectively. The 187Re/188Os ranges from 2026 ± 45 to 11718 ± 91 (2σ standard deviation), and 187Os/188Os ranges from 9.79 ± 0.04 to 105.24 ± 0.52 (2σ standard deviation). It is noted that the pyrite separate from ore sample ZK2071-11 is exceptive in that it has much lower Re contents and also lower 187Os/188Os than the other four pyrite separates (Table 7). This pyrite separate was ignored in order to obtain reliable Re-Os isochron age of Fe-Cu ore mineralization. Using the ISOPLOT software (Model 3, the Berkeley Geochronology Center, Berkeley, CA, USA) [55], a regression analysis was performed, and the intercept on ordinate indicates that the initial 187Os/188Os ratio of the pyrite is 6.2 ± 3.1 (2σ standard deviation). The obtained isochron age (average value ± 2σ standard deviation) is 140 ± 11 Ma (MSWD = 8.1) (Figure 10).

7. Discussion

7.1. Emplacement Age and Source of the No. 3 Concealed Granodiorite

It is known that before using zircon U-Pb ages to constrain the emplacement age of intrusions, it is necessary to confirm that the dated zircon is magmatic in origin so that the obtained ages are meaningful. This is done by considering the following two lines of evidence. Firstly, zircon grains have Th/U (0.44 to 0.94) within the range of magmatic zircons (Th/U > 0.1) [56], and it has been demonstrated that Th/U can be used to distinguish between magmatic, metamorphic, and hydrothermal zircons [57,58]. Secondly, zircon grains show strong enrichments in LREE relative to HREE, have negative Eu anomalies and positive Ce anomalies (Figure 11), and show oscillatory zoning (Figure 6), which are typical of magmatic zircons. Therefore, the obtained zircon U-Pb age (153.7 ± 0.58 Ma) can reliably represent the emplacement age of the No. 3 granodiorite. The obtained age is similar to the reported ages of other granodiorites (163 to 153 Ma) in the Shuikoushan ore field (Table 1). This, together with their similar REE and trace element patterns (Figure 8), indicate that the No. 3 granodiorite is co-genetic with other granodiorites in the Shuikoushan ore field.
The source of the No. 3 granodiorite is evaluated based on in-situ zircon Hf isotopic compositions [47,59]. On the diagram of zircon εHf(t) versus age (Ma), all data points are plotted in or near the field of the lower crust (Figure 12), indicating that materials of this intrusion were likely derived from the lower crust, consistent with the source of other granitoids in the Shuikoushan ore field [2,3]. As the No. 3 granodiorite has zircon two-stage Hf model age (T2DM) (1809 to 1644 Ma, Table 6) similar to the age of the basement rocks in the Shuikoushan ore field [36]), we consider the No. 3 granodiorite, as well as other granitoids in the Shuikoushan ore field were likely derived from partial melting of the Paleoproterozoic basement rocks that are composed mainly by metagreywackes [60]. When looking at a much broader scale, the W-Sn-Pb-Zn mineralization related granitoids in the Nanling Range are also thought to be derived from partial melting of the lower crustal materials [61], thus the lower crust, particularly the Paleoproterozoic basement metagreywackes may be a common source for granitoids in the whole Nanling Range.
In summary, our results indicate that the No. 3 granodiorite has the same source and is formed by a common magmatic event with other granodiorites in the Shuikoushan deposit and ore field. As only the No. 3 granodiorite is spatially related to Fe-Cu mineralization, whereas others are often spatially related to Pb-Zn mineralization, it does not seem that the No. 3 intrusion itself has a unique ‘gene’ to form Fe-Cu mineralization in this deposit.

7.2. Timing and Source of Fe-Cu Mineralization in the Shuikoushan Deposit

The examined pyrite separates yield consistent isochron ages (Figure 10), suggesting that the Re-Os system of pyrite separates may have remained closed. In addition, homogenization temperatures of fluid inclusions in sulfide minerals in the Shuikoushan ore field vary in the range of 112.0 to 417.7 °C [9]. These temperature are much lower than the pyrite Re-Os closure temperature (>500 °C) [62], indicating that the Re-Os system of pyrite separates is resistant to any subsequent metamorphism or deformation and can record the timing of crystallization. Therefore, our pyrite Re-Os isochron age provides an important constraint on the timing of Fe-Cu mineralization in the Shuikoushan deposit, which is 140 ± 11 Ma (Figure 10).
Even considering errors, the timing of Fe-Cu mineralization still post-dates the emplacement age of the No. 3 granodiorite (153.7 ± 0.58 Ma), and also the timing of Pb-Zn mineralization in the deposit (157.8 ± 1.4 Ma) [60]. Integrating observations such as: (1) the occurrence of Fe-Cu mineralization being controlled by the contact zone of the No. 3 granodiorite with the country rocks, and also by faults [4] (Figure 2b), and (2) that sulfide minerals in this mineralization type mainly occur together with quartz and calcite veinlets that crosscut the magnetite and garnet-diopside skarn (Figure 3 and Figure 4), we consider that the Fe-Cu mineralization in the Shuikoushan deposit was likely produced by post-magmatic hydrothermal fluids after the emplacement of the No. 3 granodiorite. This argument is consistent with the presence of brecciation zones in fold hinge and fault intersections in the vicinity of the ore body, which is evidence of extensive focusing and mixing of hydrothermal fluids [63].
The source of ore-forming materials for Fe-Cu mineralization is then evaluated through combining the Re contents, 187Re/188Os, and initial 187Os/188Os of pyrite separates [21,64,65,66,67]. The Re contents (5.6 to 26.9 ppb, average at 15.8 ppb) and 187Re/188Os (2026 to 42,709, average at 13,367) of pyrite separates are typical of sulfides with low-level highly radiogenic Os (LLHR) (Table 7), similar to Re-Os isotopic features of pyrites from the crust [67,68]. The initial 187Os/188Os ratio of pyrite separates (6.2 ± 3.1, Figure 10) is significantly higher than that of the mantle (0.105 to 0.152) [21,69], but is close to that of the continental crust (3.63) [70]. These indicate that the ore-forming materials of Fe-Cu mineralization were mainly derived from the crust. To be consistent with this argument, sulfides in ores of the Shuikoushan deposit also have crustal signatures of 206Pb/204Pb, 207Pb/204Pb, and 208Pb/204Pb that range from 18.4 to 18.5, 15.7 to 15.8, and 38.6 to 39.1, respectively [20]. It is therefore likely that Fe-Cu mineralization in the Shuikoushan deposit shares the same material source with the No. 3 granodiorite, which, as mentioned earlier, is related to the Paleoproterozoic basement metagreywackes.

7.3. A Genetic Model of Fe-Cu Mineralization in the Shuikoushan Deposit

Based on above discussions, the following conditions need to be considered in order to establish a genetic model for the formation of Fe-Cu mineralization in the Shuikoushan deposit. They include: (1) Fe-Cu mineralization is spatially confined within the contact zone between the No. 3 granodiorite and country rocks (limestones of the Qixia and Huitian Formations), where abundant skarns occurred (Figure 2b and Figure 3a), (2) sulfide minerals of this mineralization type crosscut the early formed skarns and magnetite (Figure 3a and Figure 4), (3) this mineralization type formed post the emplacement of the No. 3 granodiorite and is likely related to injection of hydrothermal fluids, and (4) the ore-forming materials of this mineralization type were derived from the Paleoproterozoic basement rocks, similar to the source of the No. 3 granodiorite. By integrating these conditions, a genetic model is proposed, which involves three main events. Firstly, the No. 3 granodiorite intrusion was emplaced into the surrounding country rocks (e.g., limestones), the thermal metamorphism at the contact zone produced magnetite and skarns of the skarn episode (Figure 2b and Figure 5). Secondly, post-magmatic hydrothermal fluids transported Fe-Cu sulfide components either from the basement rocks, or through remobilization of these components from the skarns and/or granodiorite. Thirdly, Fe-Cu sulfide minerals, along with quartz were precipitated within the contact zone/faults due to changes in temperature, pressure, etc., and crosscut the early formed skarns and magnetite (Figure 3a and Figure 4). It is noted that the proposed genetic model is just a preliminary one because the source of the post-magmatic hydrothermal fluids cannot be ascertained on the basis of the data in this study. Nevertheless, this study for the first time quantified the timing relationship between Fe-Cu mineralization and the No. 3 granodiorite in the Shuikoushan deposit, which provides an important basis for understanding the genesis of this mineralization type in the deposit.

7.4. Implication for the Early Cretaceous Mineralization Event in the Nanling Range

The timing of Pb-Zn-W-Sn mineralization, as well as the emplacement ages of host granoitoids in the Nanling Range have been determined to be 151 to 160 Ma [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19] (Table 8). The granodiorites (including the No. 3 intrusion) and Pb-Zn mineralization in the Shuikoushan deposit have obviously similar ages with Pb-Zn-W-Sn mineralization and host granoitoids in the Nanling Range (Table 8), indicating that the magmatism and associated Pb-Zn mineralization in this deposit can be placed into the metallogenic context of the Nanling Range [9]. The newly discovered Fe-Cu mineralization in the Shuikoushan deposit, however, is exceptive as the timing (140 ± 11 Ma) is much younger than that of Pb-Zn-W-Sn mineralization in the Nanling Range.
The time interval of 145 to 130 Ma was commonly considered as a period of magmatic quiescence and thus insignificant ore formation in the Nanling Range [15,33,44,77]. However, a recent study by [78] reported an age of 145 to 142 Ma for the muscovite granite in the Dengfuxian pluton in the Nanling Range, and an age of ca. 137 Ma for W-Sn bearing quartz veins that crosscut the Dengfuxian muscovite. Similarly, several other studies also reported 145 to 130 Ma W-Sn mineralization in the North Jiangxi Province and the Southeastern Coastal metallogenic belt that are near the Nanling Range [33,79,80,81,82]. Together with the obtained age (140 ± 11 Ma) of Fe-Cu mineralization in the Shuikoushan deposit, we consider that the mineralization barren interval of 145 to 130 Ma in the Nanling Range may need to be re-visited, and that the Early Cretaceous polymetallic mineralization events are also important and deserve further attentions in the Nanling Range.

8. Conclusions

Based on zircon isotopic studies of the No. 3 granodiorite and Re-Os isotopic dating of pyrites collected from Fe-Cu ores in the Shuikoushan deposit, the following conclusions are made:
(1)
The No. 3 granodiorite was emplaced at 153.7 ± 0.58 Ma, similar to other granitoids in the Shuikoushan ore field and Nanling Range. Fe-Cu mineralization in the deposit formed at 140 ± 11 Ma, much younger than the No. 3 granodiorite. The younger Fe-Cu mineralization is interpreted as being related to injection of post-magmatic hydrothermal fluids.
(2)
The Late Paleoproterozoic basement in the Shuikoushan ore field provides rock-forming materials and ore-forming metals of granodiorites and Fe-Cu mineralization in this region.
(3)
The Early Cretaceous may also be an important mineralization epoch in the Nanling Range.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, Z.S. and D.X.; supervision, Y.C.; writing—original draft, S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China: 41902043 Science and Technology Foundation Project in Guizhou Province: [2019]1316, CAS ”Light of West China” Program.

Data Availability Statement

Not Applicable.

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41902043), Science and Technology Foundation Project in Guizhou Province ([2019]1316), CAS “Light of West China” Program. Constructive reviews by the editor and the three anonymous reviewers significantly improved the quality of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ma, L.Y.; Lu, Y.F.; Mei, Y.P.; Chen, X.Q. Zircon SHRIMP U-Pb dating of granodiorite from Shuikoushan ore-field, Hunan province and its geological significance. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2006, 22, 2475–2482, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  2. Zuo, C.H.; Lu, R.; Zhao, Z.X.; Xu, Z.W.; Lu, J.J.; Wang, R.C.; Chen, J.Q. Characterization of element geochemistry, LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb age, and Hf isotope of granodiorite in the Shuikoushan deposit, Changning, Hunan Province. Geol. Rev. 2014, 60, 811–823, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  3. Li, J.; Zhao, P.P.; Liu, J.G.; Wang, X.C.; Yang Alexandra Wang, G.Q.; Xu, J.F. Reassessment of hydrofluoric acid desilicification in the Carius tube digestion technique for Re-Os isotopic analysis in geological samples. Geostand. Geoanalytical Res. 2015, 39, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Chen, P.B.; Liu, J.S.; Wan, K.Y.; Xu, W.J.; Xiong, F.S.; Ren, Z. Geological characteristics and prospecting criteria of skarn iron poly-metallic deposit related to No. 3 granite intrusion in the Shuikoushan ore field, Hunan. Min. Explor. 2016, 7, 450–455, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  5. Zeng, M.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Li, T.; Li, C.; Wei, C. Structural controls on the Lala iron-copper deposit of the Kangdian metallogenic province, southwestern China: Tectonic and metallogenic implications. Ore Geol. Rev. 2018, 97, 35–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wan, K.Y.; Chen, P.B.; He, C.X.; Liao, C.H.; Zuo, C.H.; Li, Q.S.; Liu, M.H.; Luo, Q.; Xiang, H.L. The Resource Exploration Report of the Shuikoushan polymetallic Deposit in Hunan Province; Team 217 of Hunan Nonferrous Geological Exploration Bureau Internal Report; Hunan Nonferrous Geological Exploration Bureau: Hunan, China, 2015; p. 120. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhen, S.M.; Zhu, X.Y.; Li, Y.S.; Du, Z.Z.; Gong, F.Y.; Gong, X.D.; Qi, F.Y.; Jia, D.L.; Wang, L.L. Zircon U-Pb geochro-nology and Hf isotopic compositions of the monzonite, related to the Xianrenyan Au deposite in Hunan province and its geological significances. J. Jilin Univ. (Earth Sci. Ed.) 2012, 42, 1740–1756, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhao, Z.X.; Lu, R.; Zuo, C.H.; Miao, B.H.; Xu, Z.W.; Lu, J.J. Discussion on Hunan province Changning Shuikoushan Pb-Zn ore deposit genesis. Acta Mineral. Sin. 2013, s2, 540–541, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  9. Huang, J.C.; Peng, J.T.; Yang, J.H.; Zhang, B.L.; Xu, C.X. Precise zircon U-Pb and molybdenite Re–Os dating of the Shuikoushan granodiorite-related Pb–Zn mineralization, southern Hunan, south china. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 71, 305–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hua, R.M.; Chen, P.R.; Zhang, W.L.; Liu, X.D.; Lu, J.J.; Lin, J.F.; Yao, J.M.; Qi, H.W.; Zhang, Z.S.; Gu, S.Y. Metallogenic systems related to Mesozoic and Cenozoic granitoids in South China. Sci. China Ser. D. 2003, 46, 816–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mao, J.W.; Xie, G.Q.; Guo, C.L.; Yuan, S.D.; Cheng, Y.B.; Chen, Y.C. Spatial-temporal distribution of Mesozoic ore deposits in South China and their metallogenic settings. Geol. J.China Univ. 2008, 14, 510–526, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  12. Li, H.Y.; Mao, J.W.; Sun, Y.L.; Zou, X.Q.; He, H.L.; Du, A.D. Re–Os isotopic chronology of the molybdenites in the Shizhuyuan polymetallic tungsten deposit, southern Hunan. Geol. Rev. 1996, 42, 261–271, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  13. Mao, J.W.; Stein, H.; Du, A.D.; Zhou, T.F.; Mei, Y.X.; Li, Y.F.; Zang, W.S.; Li, J.W. Molybdenite Re-Os precise dating for molybdenite from Cu-Au-Mo deposits in the middle-lower reaches of Yangtze River belt and its implications for mineralization. Acta Geol. Sin. 2004, 78, 121–131, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  14. Mao, J.W.; Xie, G.Q.; Li, X.F.; Zhang, C.Q.; Mei, Y.X. Mesozoic large scale mineralization and multiple lithospheric extension in South China. Earth Sci. Front. 2004, 1, 45–55, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  15. Mao, J.W.; Xie, G.Q.; Guo, C.L.; Chen, Y.C. Large-scale W-tin mineralization in the Nanling region, South China: Metallogenic ages and corresponding geodynamic processes. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2007, 23, 2329–2338, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  16. Peng, J.T.; Hu, R.Z.; Bi, X.W.; Dai, T.M.; Li, Z.L.; Li, X.M.; Shuang, Y.; Yuan, S.D.; Liu, S.R. 40Ar/39Ar isotopic dating of tin mineralization in Furong deposit of Hunan Province and its geological significance. Miner. Depos. 2007, 3, 237–248, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu, X.F.; Yuan, S.D.; Wu, S.H. Re-Os dating of the molybdenite from the Jinchuantang tin-bismuth deposit in Hunan Province and its geological significance. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2012, 28, 39–51, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  18. Yuan, S.D.; Liu, X.F.; Wang, X.D.; Wu, S.H.; Yuan, Y.B.; Li, X.K.; Wang, T.Z. Geological characteristics and 40Ar-39Ar geochronology of the Hongqiling tin deposit in southern Hunan Province. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2012, 28, 3787–3797, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  19. Yuan, Y.B.; Yuan, S.D.; Chen, C.J.; Huo, R. Zircon U-Pb ages and Hf isotopes of the granitoids in the Huangshaping mining area and their geological significance. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2014, 30, 64–78, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  20. Lu, R.; Xu, Z.W.; Lu, J.J.; Wang, R.C.; Zuo, C.H.; Zhao, Z.X.; Miao, B.H. Genesis of the Shuikoushan Pb-Zn deposite, Changning City, Hunan province. J. Nanjing Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2013, 49, 732–746, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  21. Walker, R.J.; Carlson, R.W.; Shirey, S.B.; Boyd, F.R. Os, Sr, Nd, and Pb isotope systematics of southern African peridotite xenoliths: Implications for the chemical evolution of subcontinental mantle. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1989, 53, 1583–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ruiz, J.; Freydier, C.; McCandless, T.; Chesley, J.; Munizaga, F. Re-Os-Isotope systematics of sulfides from base-metal porphyry and manto-type mineralization in Chile. Int. Geol. Rev. 1997, 39, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lambert, D.D.; Foster, J.G.; Frick, L.R. Re-Os isotopic systematics of the Voisey’s Bay Ni-Cu-Co magmatic ore system, Labrador, Canada. Lithos 1999, 47, 69–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kirk, J.D.; Ruiz, J.; Kesler, S.E.; Simon, A.; Muntean, J.L. Re-Os age of the pueblo Viejo epithermal deposit, Dominican Republic. Econ. Geol. 2014, 109, 503–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mo, Z.S.; Ye, B.D.; Pan, W.Z.; Wan, S.N. Geology of Granites in Nanling Range; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1980; pp. 1–363. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhou, X.; Sun, T.; Shen, W.; Shu, L.; Niu, A.Y. Petrogenesis of Mesozoic granitoids and volcanic rocks in South China: A response to tectonic evolution. Episodes 2006, 29, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Xu, K.Q.; Ding, Y. Viewpoints on the genesis and classification for the tungsten deposits in China. Geol. Rev. 1983, 3, 305–325, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  28. Jiang, S.Y.; Zhao, K.D.; Jiang, Y.H.; Ling, H.F.; Ni, P. New type of tin w element and isotope geochemistry. Acta Pet. Sin. 2006, 22, 2509–2516, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  29. Jiang, S.Y.; Zhao, K.D.; Jiang, Y.H.; Dai, B.Z. Characteristics and genesis of Mesozoic A type granites and associated mineral deposits in the southern Hunan and northern Guangxi provinces along the Shi-Hang Belt, South China. Geol. J. China Univ. 2008, 14, 496–509, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  30. Yang, J.-H.; Peng, J.-T.; Zheng, Y.-F.; Hu, R.-Z.; Bi, X.-W.; Zhao, J.-H.; Huang, J.-C.; Zhang, B.-L. Petrogenesis of the Mesozoic Shuikoushan peraluminous I-type granodioritic intrusion in Hunan Province, South China: Middle–lower crustal reworking in an extensional tectonic setting. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2016, 123, 224–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Peng, J.; Zhou, M.-F.; Hu, R.; Shen, N.; Yuan, S.; Bi, X.; Du, A.; Qu, W. Precise molybdenite Re–Os and mica Ar–Ar dating of the Mesozoic Yaogangxian tungsten deposit, central Nanling district, South China. Miner. Deposita 2006, 41, 661–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Peng, J.T.; Hu, R.Z.; Yuan, S.D.; Bi, X.W.; Shen, N.P. The time ranges of granitoid emplacement and related nonferrous metallic mineralization in southern Hunan. Geol. Rev. 2008, 54, 617–625, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  33. Mao, J.W.; Cheng, Y.B.; Chen, M.H.; Franco, P. Major types and time-space distribution of Mesozoic ore deposits in South China and their geodynamic settings. Miner. Depos. 2013, 48, 267–294. [Google Scholar]
  34. Li, N.Q.; Peng, C. Shuikoushan Lead-Zinc-Gold-Silver Orefield, Hunan, China; Seismological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1996; pp. 1–103. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  35. Lu, Y.F.; Ma, L.Y.; Qu, W.J.; Mei, Y.P.; Chen, X.Q. U-Pb and Re-Os isotope geochronology of Baoshan Cu-Mo polymetallic ore deposit in Hunan province. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2006, 22, 2483–2492, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  36. Chen, J.F.; Jahn, B.M. Crustal evolution of southeastern China: Nd and Sr isotopic evidence. Tectonophysics 1998, 284, 101–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yu, H.X.; Liu, J.Y. The characteristic and petrogenesis of the felsic-intermediate subvolcanic complex in the Shuikoushan orefield. Geotecton. Et. Metallog. 1997, 1, 32–40, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  38. Elhlou, S.; Belousova, E.; Griffin, W.L.; Pearson, N.J.; O’Reilly, S.Y. Trace element and isotopic composition of GJ-red zircon standard by laser ablation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2006, 70, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sláma, J.; Košler, J.; Condon, D.J.; Crowley, J.L.; Gerdes, A.; Hanchar, J.M.; Horstwood, M.S.; Morris, G.A.; Nasdala, L.; Norberg, N.; et al. Plešovice zircon—A new natural reference material for U–Pb and Hf isotopic microanalysis. Chem. Geol. 2008, 249, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, Y.; Gao, S.; Hu, Z.; Gao, C.; Zong, K.; Wang, D. Continental and oceanic crust recycling-induced melt-peridotite interactions in the Trans-North China Orogen: U-Pb dating, Hf isotopes and trace elements in zicons from mantle xenoliths. J. Pet. 2009, 51, 537–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ludwing, K.R. User’s Manual for Isoplot 3.75: A Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Berkeley Geochronological Center Special Publication No. 5: Berkeley, CA, USA. 2012. Available online: https://www.geocalculate.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Isoplot3_75-4_15manual.pdf (accessed on 30 January 2012).
  42. Wu, F.-Y.; Yang, Y.-H.; Xie, L.-W.; Yang, J.-H.; Xu, P. Hf isotopic compositions of the standard zircons and baddeleyites used in U–Pb geochronology. Chem. Geol. 2006, 234, 105–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yuan, H.-L.; Gao, S.; Dai, M.-N.; Zong, C.-L.; Günther, D.; Fontaine, G.H.; Liu, X.-M.; Diwu, C. Simultaneous determinations of U–Pb age, Hf isotopes and trace element compositions of zircon by excimer laser-ablation quadrupole and multiple-collector ICP-MS. Chem. Geol. 2008, 247, 100–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, Q.L.; Li, X.H.; Liu, Y.; Tang, G.Q.; Yang, J.H.; Zhu, W.G. Precise U-Pb and Pb-Pb dating of Phanerozoic baddeleyite by SIMS with oxygen flooding technique. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2010, 25, 1107–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wu, F.Y.; Li, X.H.; Zheng, Y.F.; Gao, S. Lu-Hf isotopic systematics and their applications in petrology. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2007, 23, 185–220, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  46. Rubatto, D.; Gebauer, D. Use of cathodoluminescence for U-Pb zircon dating by ion microprobe: Some examples from the Western Alps. In Cathodoluminescence in Geosciences; Pagel, M., Barbin, V., Blanc, P., Ohnenstetter, D., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2000; pp. 373–400. [Google Scholar]
  47. Griffin, W.L.; Pearson, N.J.; Belousova, E.; Jackson, S.E.; van Achterbergh, E.; O’Reilly, S.Y.; Shee, S.R. The Hf isotope composition of cratonic mantle: LA-MC-ICPMS analysis of zircon megacrysts in kimberlites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2000, 64, 133–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cohen, A.S.; Waters, F.G. Separation of osmium from geological materials by solvent extraction for analysis by thermal ionisation mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 1996, 332, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nier, A.O. The Isotopic Constitution of Osmium. Phys. Rev. 1937, 52, 885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, J.; Xu, J.F.; Suzuki Katsuhiko He, B.; Xu, Y.G.; Ren, Z.Y. Os, Nd and Sr isotope and trace element geochemistry of the Muli picrites: Insights into the mantle source of the Emeishan Large Igneous Province. Lithos 2010, 119, 108–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, J.; Jiang, X.Y.; Xu, J.F.; Zhong, L.F.; Wang, X.C.; Wang, G.Q.; Zhao, P.P. Determination of platinum-group elements and Re-Os isotopes using ID-ICP-MS and N-TIMS from a single digestion after two-stage column separation. Geostand. Geoanalytical Res. 2014, 38, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Sun, S.-S.; McDonough, W.F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: Implications for mantle composition and processes. Geol. Soc. London. Spéc. Publ. 1989, 42, 313–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Watson, E.B.; Wark, D.A.; Thomas, J.B. Crystallization thermometers for zircon and rutile. Contrib. Miner. Pet. 2006, 151, 413–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Micheletti, F.; Fornelli, A.; Piccarreta, G.; Barbey, P.; Tiepolo, M. The basement of Calabria (southern Italy) within the context of the Southern European Variscides: LA-ICPMS and SIMS U–Pb zircon study. Lithos 2008, 104, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ludwig, K.R. Isoplot/Ex: A geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel; Berkeley Geochronology Center Special Publication: Version 3.0; Berkeley Geochronology Center: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1999; p. 49. Available online: https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/6739593 (accessed on 27 August 2003).
  56. Hoskin, P.O. Trace-element composition of hydrothermal zircon and the alteration of Hadean zircon from the Jack Hills, Australia. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2005, 69, 637–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Belousova, E.A.; Griffin, W.L.; O’ Reilly, S.Y.; Fisher, N.L. Igneous zircon: Trace element composition as an indicator of source rock type. Contrib. Miner. Pet. 2002, 143, 602–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hermann, J.; Rubatto, D.; Korsakov, A.; Shatsky, V.S. Multiple zircon growth during fast exhumation of diamondiferous, deeply subducted continental crust (Kokchetav Massif, Kazakhstan). Contrib. Miner. Pet. 2001, 141, 66–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bouvier, A.; Vervoort, J.D.; Patchett, P.J. The Lu-Hf and Sm-Nd isotopic composition of CHUR: Constraints from unequilibrated chondrites and implications for the bulk composition of terrestrial planets. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2008, 273, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Huang, J.C. Geochronology and Petrogenetic-Metallogenic Mechanisms in the Shuikoushan Pb-Zn-Au Deposit; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences: Hunan, China, 2016; (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  61. Mao, J.W.; Pirajno, F.; Xiang, J.F.; Gao, J.J.; Ye, H.S.; Li, Y.F.; Guo, B.J. Mesozoic molybdenum deposits in the east Qinling–Dabie orogenic belt: Characteristics and tectonic settings. Ore Geol. Rev. 2011, 43, 264–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, S.D.; Wang, Z.G.; Wang, K.Y.; Cai, W.Y.; Peng, D.W.; Xiao, L.; Li, J. Re–Os Pyrite geochronological evidence of three mineralization styles within the Jinchang Gold Deposit, Yanji–Dongning Metallogenic Belt, Northeast China. Minerals 2018, 8, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Zhang, Y.; Lin, G.; Roberts, P.; Ord, A. Numerical modelling of deformation and fluid flow in the Shuikoushan district, Hunan Province, South China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2007, 31, 261–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Walker, R.; Morgan, J.; Horan, M.; Czamanske, G.; Krogstad, E.; Fedorenko, V.; Kunilov, V. Re-Os isotopic evidence for an enriched-mantle source for the Noril’sk-type, ore-bearing intrusions, Siberia. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1994, 58, 4179–4197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Foster, J.G.; Lambert, D.D.; Frick, L.R.; Maas, R. Re-Os isotopic evidence for genesis of Archaean nickel ores from uncontaminated komatiites. Nature 1996, 382, 703–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mao, J.W.; Wang, Z.L. A preliminary study on time limits and geodynamic setting of large-scale metallogeny in east China. Miner. Depos. 2000, 9, 289–299, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  67. Stein, H.J.; Morgan, J.W.; Schersten, A. Re-Os Dating of Low-Level Highly Radiogenic (LLHR) Sulfides:The Harnas Gold Deposit, Southwest Sweden, Records Continental-Scale TectonicEvents. Econ. Geol. 2000, 95, 1657–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Arne, D.; Bierlein, F.P.; Morgan, J.W.; Stein, H.J. Re-Os dating of sulfides associated with gold mineralization in central Victoria, Australia. Econ. Geol. 2001, 96, 1455–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Shirey, S.B.; Walker, R.J. The Re-Os isotope system in cosmochemistry and high-temperature geochemistry. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 1998, 26, 423–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Palmer, M.R.; Turekian, K.K. 187Os/186Os in marine manganese nodules and the constraints on the crustal geochemistries of rhenium and osmium. Nat. Cell Biol. 1986, 319, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lei, Z.H.; Chen, F.W.; Chen, Z.H.; Xu, Y.M.; Gong, S.Q.; Li, H.Q.; Mei, Y.P.; Qu, W.J.; Wang, D.H. Petrogenetic and metallogenic age determination of the Huangshaping Pb-Zn polymetallic deposit and its geological significance. Acta Geosci. Sin. 2010, 31, 532–540, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  72. Xie, Y.C.; Lu, J.J.; Ma, D.S.; Zhang, R.Q.; Gao, J.F.; Yao, Y. Origin of granodiorite porphyry and mafic microgranular enclave in the Baoshan Pb-Zn polymetallic deposit, southern Hunan Province: Zircon U-Pb chronological, geochemical and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic constraints. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2013, 29, 4186–4214. [Google Scholar]
  73. Lu, Y.Y.; Fu, J.M.; Cheng, S.B.; Liu, S.S.; Li, C.B.; Zhang, L.G.; Ma, L.Y. Rock-Forming and Ore-Forming Ages of Tongshanling Cu Polymetallic Ore-Field in Southern Hunan Province. Geotecton. Et. Metallog. 2015, 39, 1061–1071, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  74. Li, S.T.; Wang, J.B.; Zhu, X.Y.; Li, C. Re-Os dating of molybdenite and S isotope analysis of the Yaogangxian W polymetallic deposits in Hunan province and their geological significance. Geoscience 2011, 25, 228–235, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  75. Xuan, Y.S.; Yuan, S.D.; Yuan, Y.B.; Mi, J.R. Zircon U-Pb age, geochemistry and Petrogenesis of Jianfengling pluton in southern Hunan Province. Miner. Depos. 2014, 33, 1379–1390. [Google Scholar]
  76. Yao, J.; Hua, R.; Qu, W.; Qi, H.; Lin, J.; Du, A. Re-Os isotope dating of molybdenites in the Huangshaping Pb-Zn-W-Mo polymetallic deposit, Hunan Province, South China and its geological significance. Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci. 2007, 50, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hua, R.M.; Li, G.L.; Zhang, W.L.; Hu, D.Q.; Chen, P.R.; Chen, W.F.; Wang, X.D. A tentative discussion on differences between large-scale W and tin mineralizations in South China. Min. Depos. 2010, 29, 9–23, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  78. Xiong, Y.-Q.; Shao, Y.-J.; Cheng, Y.; Jiang, S.-Y. Discrete Jurassic and Cretaceous Mineralization Events at the Xiangdong W(-Sn) Deposit, Nanling Range, South China. Econ. Geol. 2020, 115, 385–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Huang, L.; Jiang, S. Highly fractionated S-type granites from the giant Dahutang tungsten deposit in Jiangnan orogen, southeast China: Geochronology, Petrogenesis and their relationship with W-mineralization. Lithos 2014, 202, 207–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pan, X.; Hou, Z.; Li, Y.; Chen, G.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, C.; Wei, J.; Kang, C. Dating the giant Zhuxi W–Cu deposit (Taqian–Fuchun Ore Belt) in South China using molybdenite Re–Os and muscovite Ar–Ar system. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 86, 719–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Liu, P.; Mao, J.; Pirajno, F.; Jia, L.; Zhang, F.; Li, Y. Ore genesis and geodynamic setting of the Lianhuashan porphyry tungsten deposit, eastern Guangdong Province, SE China: Constraints from muscovite 40Ar-39Ar and zircon U-Pb dating and Hf isotopes. Miner. Depos. 2017, 5, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liu, P.; Mao, J.; Santosh, M.; Xu, L.; Zhang, R.; Jia, L. The Xiling Sn deposit, eastern Guangdong Province, southeast China: A new genetic model from 40Ar/39Ar muscovite and U-Pb cassiterite and zircon geochronology. Econ. Geol. 2018, 113, 511–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Minerals 11 00480 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) The tectonic regimes of South China, the location of the Shuikoushan ore field is highlighted using a square. (b) Geologic map of the Shuikoushan ore field showing locations of various deposits (modified after [2,5]); the location of the Shuikoushan deposit is outlined using a blue dashed square.
Figure 1. (a) The tectonic regimes of South China, the location of the Shuikoushan ore field is highlighted using a square. (b) Geologic map of the Shuikoushan ore field showing locations of various deposits (modified after [2,5]); the location of the Shuikoushan deposit is outlined using a blue dashed square.
Minerals 11 00480 g001
Minerals 11 00480 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Geologic map of the Shuikoushan deposit showing locations of different intrusions and country rocks (Modified from [20]). The concealed No. 3 granodiorite is projected on the surface (outlined by a blue dashed curve), the No. 2 and No. 4 granodioritic bodies are located at the western and eastern sides of the deposit, respectively, and are separated by a fault. (b) Cross-section of line 207 in the Shuikoushan deposit. Locations and shapes of the Pb-Zn and Fe-Cu ore bodies are displayed in this figure. The Pb-Zn ore body is distributed mainly along the contact zone between the No. 2 granodiorite and fractured limestone, whereas the Fe-Cu ore body is distributed along the contact zone between the No. 3 granodiorite and Lower Permian Qixia limestone, note that several lenses of skarns are seen within the Fe-Cu ore body.
Figure 2. (a) Geologic map of the Shuikoushan deposit showing locations of different intrusions and country rocks (Modified from [20]). The concealed No. 3 granodiorite is projected on the surface (outlined by a blue dashed curve), the No. 2 and No. 4 granodioritic bodies are located at the western and eastern sides of the deposit, respectively, and are separated by a fault. (b) Cross-section of line 207 in the Shuikoushan deposit. Locations and shapes of the Pb-Zn and Fe-Cu ore bodies are displayed in this figure. The Pb-Zn ore body is distributed mainly along the contact zone between the No. 2 granodiorite and fractured limestone, whereas the Fe-Cu ore body is distributed along the contact zone between the No. 3 granodiorite and Lower Permian Qixia limestone, note that several lenses of skarns are seen within the Fe-Cu ore body.
Minerals 11 00480 g002
Minerals 11 00480 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Underground photo showing skarns at the contact zone between the No. 3 granodiorite and country rocks; (b) The close-up of photo (a) showing pyrite veinlets in the skarn. (c) Core image showing the Fe-Cu ore body at the contact zone where skarns are present, note the granodiorite rocks in the first row of the core box. (d) Core image showing numerous calcite veins (yellow-white color) occur within the Fe-Cu ore body. Abbreviations: Cal—calcite, Py—pyrite, SK—skarn.
Figure 3. (a) Underground photo showing skarns at the contact zone between the No. 3 granodiorite and country rocks; (b) The close-up of photo (a) showing pyrite veinlets in the skarn. (c) Core image showing the Fe-Cu ore body at the contact zone where skarns are present, note the granodiorite rocks in the first row of the core box. (d) Core image showing numerous calcite veins (yellow-white color) occur within the Fe-Cu ore body. Abbreviations: Cal—calcite, Py—pyrite, SK—skarn.
Minerals 11 00480 g003
Minerals 11 00480 g004 550
Figure 4. Typical ore hand specimens and microscopic photographs of the Shuikoushan deposit. (a) Magnetite replaced garnet skarn, pyrite-chalcopyrite-quartz veins interspersed within magnetite. (b) Pyrite-quartz vein crosscut skarns; (c) cubic pyrite grains in a quartz vein, note that a calcite vein crosscut magnetite. (d) Chalcopyrite and pyrite stringers and veinlets within the magnetite-bearing ore. (e) Massive chalcopyrite occurs together with calcite veins and blebs. (f) Disseminated to semi-massive pyrite and chalcopyrite within a garnet skarn. (g) Pyrite and chalcopyrite infilled into fissures of magnetite grains. (h) Chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite were enclosed by sphalerite and pyrite, respectively. (i) Chalcopyrite replaced pyrite along fissures of pyrite. (j) Harbor-shaped and island-like pyrite was replaced by galena. (k) Chalcopyrite was replaced by sphalerite, resulting in the ‘chalcopyrite disease’ texture. Abbreviations: Cal—calcite, Ccp—chalcopyrite, Gn—galena, Mag—magnetite, Qtz—quartz, Po—pyrrhotite, Py—pyrite, Sp—sphalerite.
Figure 4. Typical ore hand specimens and microscopic photographs of the Shuikoushan deposit. (a) Magnetite replaced garnet skarn, pyrite-chalcopyrite-quartz veins interspersed within magnetite. (b) Pyrite-quartz vein crosscut skarns; (c) cubic pyrite grains in a quartz vein, note that a calcite vein crosscut magnetite. (d) Chalcopyrite and pyrite stringers and veinlets within the magnetite-bearing ore. (e) Massive chalcopyrite occurs together with calcite veins and blebs. (f) Disseminated to semi-massive pyrite and chalcopyrite within a garnet skarn. (g) Pyrite and chalcopyrite infilled into fissures of magnetite grains. (h) Chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite were enclosed by sphalerite and pyrite, respectively. (i) Chalcopyrite replaced pyrite along fissures of pyrite. (j) Harbor-shaped and island-like pyrite was replaced by galena. (k) Chalcopyrite was replaced by sphalerite, resulting in the ‘chalcopyrite disease’ texture. Abbreviations: Cal—calcite, Ccp—chalcopyrite, Gn—galena, Mag—magnetite, Qtz—quartz, Po—pyrrhotite, Py—pyrite, Sp—sphalerite.
Minerals 11 00480 g004
Minerals 11 00480 g005 550
Figure 5. Paragenetic sequence of ore and gangue minerals in the Fe-Cu ore body of the Shuikoushan deposit.
Figure 5. Paragenetic sequence of ore and gangue minerals in the Fe-Cu ore body of the Shuikoushan deposit.
Minerals 11 00480 g005
Minerals 11 00480 g006 550
Figure 6. Cathodoluminescence images of zircon grains collected from the No. 3 granodiorite in the Shuikoushan deposit. The dashed red circles represent laser pits (~30 um) for zircon trace element and U-Pb isotopic analyses, the solid red circles represent laser pits for zircon Hf isotopic analyses (~50 um).
Figure 6. Cathodoluminescence images of zircon grains collected from the No. 3 granodiorite in the Shuikoushan deposit. The dashed red circles represent laser pits (~30 um) for zircon trace element and U-Pb isotopic analyses, the solid red circles represent laser pits for zircon Hf isotopic analyses (~50 um).
Minerals 11 00480 g006
Minerals 11 00480 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) K2O versus SiO2 plot for classification of rocks from the No. 3 granodiorite; (b) A/NK versus A/CNK diagram shows that the No. 3 granodiorite has a metaluminous geochemical affinity.
Figure 7. (a) K2O versus SiO2 plot for classification of rocks from the No. 3 granodiorite; (b) A/NK versus A/CNK diagram shows that the No. 3 granodiorite has a metaluminous geochemical affinity.
Minerals 11 00480 g007
Minerals 11 00480 g008 550
Figure 8. Chondrite-normalized REE (a) and primitive mantle normalized trace element (b) diagrams for rocks of the No. 3 granodiorite and other granodiorites in the Shuikoushan deposit. Data of other granodiorite are from [30], chondrite and primitive mantle values are from [52].
Figure 8. Chondrite-normalized REE (a) and primitive mantle normalized trace element (b) diagrams for rocks of the No. 3 granodiorite and other granodiorites in the Shuikoushan deposit. Data of other granodiorite are from [30], chondrite and primitive mantle values are from [52].
Minerals 11 00480 g008
Minerals 11 00480 g009 550
Figure 9. (a) Zircon U-Pb concordia diagram and (b) the weighted average 206Pb/208U age of the No. 3 granodiorite. The three relatively older zircons are marked in red colors.
Figure 9. (a) Zircon U-Pb concordia diagram and (b) the weighted average 206Pb/208U age of the No. 3 granodiorite. The three relatively older zircons are marked in red colors.
Minerals 11 00480 g009
Minerals 11 00480 g010 550
Figure 10. The pyrite Re-Os isochron age of Fe-Cu mineralization in the Shuikoushan deposit.
Figure 10. The pyrite Re-Os isochron age of Fe-Cu mineralization in the Shuikoushan deposit.
Minerals 11 00480 g010
Minerals 11 00480 g011 550
Figure 11. Chondrite normalized rare earth element distribution diagram of zircon grains from the No. 3 granodiorite. Reference fields of hydrothermal and magmatic zircons according to [56], chondrite values according to [52].
Figure 11. Chondrite normalized rare earth element distribution diagram of zircon grains from the No. 3 granodiorite. Reference fields of hydrothermal and magmatic zircons according to [56], chondrite values according to [52].
Minerals 11 00480 g011
Minerals 11 00480 g012 550
Figure 12. Plot of εHf(t) vs. U-Pb age of zircon grains from the No. 3 granodiorite.
Figure 12. Plot of εHf(t) vs. U-Pb age of zircon grains from the No. 3 granodiorite.
Minerals 11 00480 g012
Table
Table 1. Ages of several mineralized intrusions in the Shuikoushan ore field.
Table 1. Ages of several mineralized intrusions in the Shuikoushan ore field.
IntrusionsRockMineralMethodAge (Ma)Reference
Yagongtang No. 4GranodioriteZirconLA-ICP-MS U-Pb163 ± 2[1]
Yagongtang No. 3GranodioriteZirconSHRIMP U-Pb156.33 ± 0.64[3]
ZhongquGranodioriteZirconLA-ICP-MS U-Pb153.0 ± 0.9[8]
ZhongquGranodioriteZirconLA-ICP-MS U-Pb156.0 ± 1.0[2]
Xianrenyan GranodioriteZirconLA-ICP-MS U-Pb156.09 ± 0.46[7]
LaoyachaoGranodioriteZirconSIMS U–Pb158.8 ± 1.8[9]
Table
Table 2. Sampling locations of pyrite separates selected for Re-Os isochron dating, collected from the Fe-Cu ore body.
Table 2. Sampling locations of pyrite separates selected for Re-Os isochron dating, collected from the Fe-Cu ore body.
Sample No.Sample DescriptionsSample Locations
ZK2071-1Massive pyrite-magnetite oreDrill hole ZK2071-1@ 997.82 m
ZK2071-7Garnet skarn that contains disseminated chalcopyrite and pyriteDrill hole ZK2071-1@ 1094.8 m
ZK2071-8Massive chalcopyrite-pyrite-magnetite oreDrill hole ZK2071-1@ 1089.9 m
ZK2071-10Massive pyrite-magnetite oreDrill hole ZK2071-1@ 1070 m
ZK2071-11Magnetite ore that contains pyrite-quartz veinsDrill hole ZK2071-1@ 1199 m
Table
Table 3. Whole-rock major oxide (wt.%) and trace element (ppm) compositions of rocks from the No. 3 granodiorite.
Table 3. Whole-rock major oxide (wt.%) and trace element (ppm) compositions of rocks from the No. 3 granodiorite.
Sample No.ZK2001-1ZK2001-2ZK2001-3ZK2001-4ZK2001-5ZK2001-6ZK2001-7ZK2001-8ZK2001-9ZK2001-10
SiO257.4156.5756.6262.2955.7856.2360.8360.3159.8361.48
Al2O316.0417.6116.2815.7215.7616.9815.9816.0115.5215.86
TFeO7.627.317.676.427.827.387.077.566.36.55
CaO5.895.815.33.428.516.473.954.24.364.1
MgO3.282.913.532.373.853.512.482.472.492.44
Na2O2.913.042.952.853.432.932.962.893.072.95
K2O3.694.043.634.062.423.913.713.534.243.87
Cr2O30.010.020.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.01
TiO20.951.131.140.640.531.120.680.710.660.67
MnO0.130.120.120.120.190.150.130.160.150.14
P2O50.410.380.440.330.410.410.350.410.340.36
SrO0.080.090.070.060.080.090.070.060.060.07
BaO0.10.110.10.080.050.110.080.070.090.1
LOI *0.990.792.281.361.091.081.331.872.771.16
Total99.5199.93100.1499.7399.93100.3899.63100.2699.8999.76
A/CNK **0.820.880.881.030.660.810.990.990.880.96
A/NK ***1.821.881.851.731.911.871.801.861.611.75
Rb126.5145.5128.514986.3144140.5137.5152134
Sr717834603602708794636625534661
Y22.920.620.922.732.822.624.227.82423.3
Zr189210232165131197178177177173
Nb9.810.612.712.85.810.313.714.813.313.3
Ba896954795755423952743671750832
La37.239.140.344.941.839.844.25040.440.5
Ce74.276.479.185.489.778.785.698.981.880.6
Pr8.68.88.839.4610.79.099.711.39.699.29
Nd33.133.834.736.343.335.737.94437.836.4
Sm6.156.416.27.298.697.087.528.617.617.12
Eu1.681.81.61.632.261.751.71.931.71.72
Gd5.144.875.195.226.775.265.696.955.625.54
Tb0.760.690.710.81.050.760.820.980.810.77
Dy4.253.864.044.266.164.424.535.364.514.58
Ho0.850.770.750.861.260.860.891.040.930.92
Er2.492.082.092.283.522.422.462.892.482.4
Tm0.370.310.310.320.520.360.360.430.370.36
Yb2.312.042.082.073.452.292.382.652.422.32
Lu0.360.310.320.340.520.350.360.390.340.34
Hf5.866.74.84.15.85.65.35.55.4
Ta0.70.80.90.90.90.81.11.111
Th10.510.2510.7512.257.299.3912.513.0513.813.35
Y22.920.620.922.732.822.624.227.82423.3
∑LREE ****160.93166.31170.73184.98196.45172.12186.62214.74179175.63
∑HREE *****39.4335.5336.3938.8556.0539.3241.6948.4941.4840.53
∑REE ******200.36201.84207.12223.83252.5211.44228.31263.23220.48216.16
Eu/Eu*0.910.980.860.810.900.880.790.760.790.84
Ce/Ce*1.151.141.151.151.151.131.141.151.141.14
* Loss on ignition; ** A/CNK = Al2O3/(CaO + Na2O + K2O); *** A/NK = Al2O3/(Na2O + K2O); **** Total abundances of light rare earth elements; ***** Total abundances of heavy rare earth elements; ****** Total abundances of rare earth elements; Eu/Eu* = (Eu)N/[(Sm)N × (Gd)N]0.5, Ce/Ce* = (Ce)N/[(La)N × (Nd)N]0.5.
Table
Table 4. The Ti and rare earth element (REE) contents (ppm) of zircons from the No. 3 granodiorite of the Shuikoushan deposit.
Table 4. The Ti and rare earth element (REE) contents (ppm) of zircons from the No. 3 granodiorite of the Shuikoushan deposit.
No.TiLaCePrNdSmEuGdTbDyHoErTmYbLu
013.2280.43524.5560.1311.0992.1320.88812.1214.34556.86223.603118.00328.113293.48765.303
025.4820.12013.0580.0290.5351.2840.7719.9834.09358.11925.590134.22633.215348.90378.947
033.1140.04730.3500.0690.9812.1100.93513.5974.60357.77823.340113.55627.376285.89463.469
043.4740.00216.3680.0430.6592.0410.96014.7045.64676.61332.702168.06940.053425.24793.043
052.8600.13021.3950.0841.0971.8110.84210.9574.01253.45222.320114.33727.836296.05967.230
062.98311.46141.3103.06214.1613.7740.9019.8363.11337.13715.10375.57018.219195.68443.690
073.8480.51627.9700.2051.5402.1541.12915.3515.91679.18733.152170.91940.363423.61193.754
081.5760.01822.7180.0410.6712.1141.26617.2976.73093.31538.839198.95446.658482.166103.850
093.1971.97119.1690.5782.4651.3350.5387.5332.69738.54516.04783.09520.693225.30949.877
1045.20033.61494.1238.81637.4298.3011.71016.9534.75957.48422.899114.24126.618281.60462.346
113.9940.40419.7130.1350.9591.6760.79310.8904.25954.36422.683115.10027.815297.42565.906
124.9270.42420.9880.1601.2541.6350.76810.3803.75048.15220.09399.70924.157256.11756.331
130.9665.77829.4641.3676.0752.5060.7248.8943.26539.59616.17681.16219.866209.47947.256
140.2060.00813.7120.0190.3770.8060.4666.4182.43330.20312.97068.02816.608180.33741.119
150.6600.02920.1540.0480.7221.6540.80311.1114.04552.36722.040112.70427.207286.62763.530
162.9311.13124.2200.4903.0822.8681.30317.6296.62086.96035.724177.95741.700422.50690.524
172.2100.00116.1420.0350.5551.2420.5597.6522.83435.94515.01077.15418.843203.04446.329
182.4380.22418.9140.0830.9371.6490.6768.9863.26641.85217.77790.10921.785235.54353.203
194.30811.04366.4853.38916.4196.2262.11124.5378.610111.15545.426223.85251.774542.977116.546
Table
Table 5. Zircon U-Pb isotopic compositions and geochronological results of the No. 3 granodiorite in the Shuikoushan deposit.
Table 5. Zircon U-Pb isotopic compositions and geochronological results of the No. 3 granodiorite in the Shuikoushan deposit.
No.204PbPbThUTh/UIsotope RatiosAge (Ma)
(ppm)206Pb/204Pb ± 1σ *207Pb/204Pb ± 1σ208Pb/204Pb ± 1σ207Pb/206Pb ± 1σ207Pb/235U ± 1σ206Pb/238U ± 1σ206Pb/238U ± 1σ207Pb/235U ± 1σ207Pb/206Pb ± 1σ
010.2299122843530.80162.5541 ± 3.11658.6963 ± 0.234319.8415 ± 0.52280.0493 ± 0.00170.1693 ± 0.00590.0248 ± 0.0004158 ± 3159 ± 5161 ± 81
020.000081202710.44---0.0506 ± 0.00230.1682 ± 0.00770.0240 ± 0.0004153 ± 2158 ± 7233 ± 109
030.6346174885180.9481.5192 ± 3.64544.3675 ± 0.257311.0434 ± 0.59980.0492 ± 0.00150.1577 ± 0.00470.0231 ± 0.0003147 ± 2149 ± 4167 ± 70
040.3761122053780.54105.8367 ± 4.54925.8363 ± 0.29828.537 ± 0.38130.0511 ± 0.00200.1749 ± 0.00660.0249 ± 0.0003159 ± 2164 ± 6256 ± 82
050.0000102333050.76---0.0484 ± 0.00210.1614 ± 0.00700.0245 ± 0.0004156 ± 3152 ± 6120 ± 104
060.000071622300.70---0.0476 ± 0.00190.1559 ± 0.00580.0241 ± 0.0004153 ± 2147 ± 580 ± 96
070.4531133124080.7691.6916 ± 4.39394.9962 ± 0.29969.9324 ± 0.64160.0497 ± 0.00160.1650 ± 0.00580.0239 ± 0.0003152 ± 2155 ± 5189 ± 76
080.3113183405610.61186.0025 ± 8.811510.2026 ± 0.534617.5394 ± 0.98120.0499 ± 0.00140.1659 ± 0.00470.0241 ± 0.0003153 ± 2156 ± 4191 ± 65
091.031781392310.6025.3724 ± 1.52531.5284 ± 0.2162.3369 ± 0.30630.0545 ± 0.00300.1948 ± 0.01090.0260 ± 0.0005165 ± 3181 ± 9391 ± 122
100.5950112853500.8160.2182 ± 2.18583.6562 ± 0.2287.5177 ± 0.35990.0547 ± 0.00200.1805 ± 0.00640.0241 ± 0.0004153 ± 2169 ± 6398 ± 79
110.6327122643870.6862.1847 ± 3.26043.3457 ± 0.24326.1415 ± 0.38780.0492 ± 0.00170.1626 ± 0.00570.0239 ± 0.0003152 ± 2153 ± 5167 ± 80
120.0000102443130.78---0.0500 ± 0.00180.1709 ± 0.00660.0245 ± 0.0004156 ± 2160 ± 6195 ± 83
130.000092162780.78---0.0504 ± 0.00180.1725 ± 0.00640.0246 ± 0.0004157 ± 2162 ± 6217 ± 85
140.000061081950.55---0.0553 ± 0.00380.1925 ± 0.01160.0255 ± 0.0006162 ± 4179 ± 10433 ± 152
150.7167102413350.7246.9730 ± 2.60362.6454 ± 0.23065.0501 ± 0.34240.0503 ± 0.00160.1627 ± 0.00480.0237 ± 0.0004151 ± 2153 ± 4206 ± 74
160.8753123023790.8044.8390 ± 6.95672.3401 ± 0.39065.0659 ± 1.08030.0478 ± 0.00230.1685 ± 0.00790.0256 ± 0.0004163 ± 3158 ± 7100 ± 98
170.000081722580.67---0.0507 ± 0.00190.1732 ± 0.00630.0247 ± 0.0004157 ± 2162 ± 5228 ± 85
180.684592022740.7441.9192 ± 2.06822.3646 ± 0.1764.4998 ± 0.29170.0509 ± 0.00190.1705 ± 0.00640.0242 ± 0.0003154 ± 2160 ± 6235 ± 85
190.3204205676140.92194.2122 ± 5.440110.5787 ± 0.384425.6603 ± 0.9130.0490 ± 0.00120.1611 ± 0.01050.0237 ± 0.0003151 ± 2152 ± 4150 ± 53
* 1σ standard derivation. Blank cells are marked with ‘-‘.
Table
Table 6. The Hf isotopic compositions of zircons from No. 3 granodiorite in Shuikoushan deposit.
Table 6. The Hf isotopic compositions of zircons from No. 3 granodiorite in Shuikoushan deposit.
No.Age (Ma)176Yb/177Hf2σ176Lu/177Hf2σ176Hf/177Hf2σ178Hf/177Hf2σεHf(t)TDM2 (Ma)
011580.0433730.0001400.0015180.0000060.2824810.0000121.467930.00004−7.01644
021530.0463870.0004090.0016560.0000080.2824600.0000121.467760.00003−7.81694
031470.0389900.0001310.0013890.0000040.2824510.0000091.467860.00003−8.31715
041590.0444390.0001860.0015450.0000030.2824060.0000111.467850.00003−9.61809
051560.0474200.0001540.0016290.0000080.2824370.0000101.467820.00003−8.61743
061530.0357840.0001420.0012100.0000040.2824590.0000081.467790.00002−7.81693
071520.0438280.0003730.0015600.0000120.2824330.0000091.467850.00003−8.81754
081530.0456970.0005980.0016070.0000170.2824140.0000101.467800.00003−9.51795
091650.0573600.0004920.0017140.0000110.2824270.0000111.467810.00003−8.81761
101530.0481270.0002200.0015280.0000100.2824350.0000101.467790.00003−8.71748
111520.0372080.0001830.0012020.0000090.2824600.0000111.467840.00003−7.81692
121560.0468400.0002100.0015150.0000050.2824570.0000081.467760.00002−7.91698
131570.0537400.0004570.0015550.0000180.2824620.0000091.467780.00002−7.71687
141620.0175250.0002120.0006270.0000060.2818480.0000121.467850.00003−29.23023
151510.0537470.0002320.0017290.0000060.2824570.0000081.467810.00003−8.01702
161630.0447620.0002400.0014820.0000120.2824350.0000091.467770.00003−8.51743
171570.0391110.0001780.0014400.0000060.2824570.0000091.467790.00003−7.81697
181540.0355160.0002730.0011080.0000040.2824380.0000081.467820.00002−8.51739
191510.0487640.0002240.0015390.0000060.2824180.0000081.467770.00002−9.41787
Note: εHf(t) = 10,000 × {[(176Hf/177Hf)S − (176Lu/177Hf)S × (eλt − 1)]/[(176Hf/177Hf)CHUR.0 − (176Lu/177Hf)CHUR × (eλt − 1)] − 1}; TDM1 = 1/λ × ln{1 + [(176Hf/177Hf)S − (176Hf/177Hf)DM]/[(176Lu/177Hf)S − (176Lu/177Hf)DM]}; (176Hf/177Hf)S and (176Lu/177Hf)S is the value of the sample; TDM2 = 1/λ × ln{1 + [(176Hf/177Hf)S.t − (176Hf/177Hf)DM.t]/[(176Lu/177Hf)c − (176Lu/177Hf)DM]} + t; t is the crystallization time of zircon (176Hf/177Hf)CHUR.0 = 0.282772, (176Lu/177Hf)CHUR = 0.0332, (176Hf/177Hf)DM = 0.28325, (176Lu/177Hf)DM = 0.0384 [45,46]; λ = 1.867 × 10−11/a ([47]; (176Lu/177Hf)c = 0.015.
Table
Table 7. Re-Os isotopic analysis of pyrite in the Shuikoushan deposit.
Table 7. Re-Os isotopic analysis of pyrite in the Shuikoushan deposit.
Sample No.Re (ppb)Os (ppb)187Os/188Os187Re/188Os
ValueUncertainty (2σ)ValueUncertainty (2σ)ValueUncertainty (2σ)ValueUncertainty (2σ)
ZK2071-126.8980.5620.04480.00032105.640.5242,709943
ZK2071-711.0010.4130.057480.000112.210.04237589
ZK2071-822.230.1450.049490.0002133.970.311,71891
ZK2071-1013.1550.5760.032160.0001123.610.128009352
ZK2071-115.6320.1250.030280.000069.790.04202645
Table
Table 8. Ages of some host representative granoitoids and mineralization in the Nanling Range.
Table 8. Ages of some host representative granoitoids and mineralization in the Nanling Range.
TypeDepositRockMineralMethodAge (Ma)Reference
Host intrusionsHuanshaping Pb-Zn depositGraniteZirconLA-ICP-MS U-Pb158.5 ± 0.9, 155.2 ± 0.4 160.8 ± 1.0[19]
Quartz porphyryZirconSHRIMP U-Pb152 ± 3[71]
Baoshan Pb-Zn depositGranodiorite porphyryZirconLA-ICP-MS156~158[72]
Granodiorite porphyry and skarnZirconSHRIMP U-Pb158 ± 2[35]
Tongshanling polymetallic ore fieldGranitic dioriteZirconSHRIMP U-Pb, Sm-Nd isochron157 ± 2 155 ± 8[73]
Hongqiling Sn polymetallic deposit The quartz vein type wolframiteMuscovite40Ar-39Ar isochron153.6 ± 1.5[18]
Yaogangxian W polymetallic ore depositBiotite granite, porphyritic granite and quartz porphyry ZirconSHRIMP U-Pb155.4 ± 2.2 157.6 ± 2.6 158.4 ± 2.1[74]
Furong Sn depositHornblende graniteMuscovite/Biotite40Ar-39Ar isochron157.5 ± 0.3, 156.1 ± 0.4, 160.1 ± 0.9[13,14]
SkarnMuscovite/40Ar-39Ar isochron151–160[16]
Hornblende
Xianghualing Sn polymetallic ore depositBiotite graniteZirconLA-ICP-MS U-Pb160.7 ± 2.2[75]
MineralizationHuanshaping Pb-Zn depositSkarn type oreMolybdeniteRe-Os isochron154.8 ± 1.9[76]
Skarn type oreMolybdeniteRe-Os isochron159.4 ± 3.3, 157.5 ± 2.4, 157.6 ± 2.3[71]
Baoshan Pb-Zn depositGranodiorite porphyry and skarnMolybdeniteRe-Os isochron160 ± 2[35]
Tongshanling Cu polymetallic ore fieldSkarn ore bodyMolybdeniteRe-Os isochron155 ± 3[73]
Shizhuyuan W polymetallic depositSkarn ore bodiesMolybdeniteRe-Os isochron151.0 ± 3.5[12]
Jinchuantang Sn-Bi depositSkarn type oreMolybdeniteRe-Os isochron158.8 ± 6.6[17]
Xintianling large W-Mo ore depositSkarn and quartz vein type oreMolybdeniteRe-Os isochron Skarn: 159.1 ± 2.6[18]
Quartz vein type: 159.1–160.2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, S.; Cao, Y.; Song, Z.; Xiao, D. Zircon U-Pb and Pyrite Re-Os Isotope Geochemistry of ‘Skarn-Type’ Fe-Cu Mineralization at the Shuikoushan Polymetallic Deposit, South China: Implications for an Early Cretaceous Mineralization Event in the Nanling Range. Minerals 2021, 11, 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11050480

AMA Style

Li S, Cao Y, Song Z, Xiao D. Zircon U-Pb and Pyrite Re-Os Isotope Geochemistry of ‘Skarn-Type’ Fe-Cu Mineralization at the Shuikoushan Polymetallic Deposit, South China: Implications for an Early Cretaceous Mineralization Event in the Nanling Range. Minerals. 2021; 11(5):480. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11050480

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Shengbin, Yonghua Cao, Zeyou Song, and Dan Xiao. 2021. "Zircon U-Pb and Pyrite Re-Os Isotope Geochemistry of ‘Skarn-Type’ Fe-Cu Mineralization at the Shuikoushan Polymetallic Deposit, South China: Implications for an Early Cretaceous Mineralization Event in the Nanling Range" Minerals 11, no. 5: 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11050480

APA Style

Li, S., Cao, Y., Song, Z., & Xiao, D. (2021). Zircon U-Pb and Pyrite Re-Os Isotope Geochemistry of ‘Skarn-Type’ Fe-Cu Mineralization at the Shuikoushan Polymetallic Deposit, South China: Implications for an Early Cretaceous Mineralization Event in the Nanling Range. Minerals, 11(5), 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11050480

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop