Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Combined Effect of Water Temperature and Complex Water Matrices on Xanthate Adsorption Using Multiple Linear Regression
Next Article in Special Issue
Improving Colloidal Stability of Sepiolite Suspensions: Effect of the Mechanical Disperser and Chemical Dispersant
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Offshore Sediment Evidence of the 1755 CE Tsunami (Faro, Portugal): Implications for the Study of Outer Shelf Tsunami Deposits
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Comparative Study of the Hydrophobicity of Organo-Montmorillonite Modified with Cationic, Amphoteric and Nonionic Surfactants

Department of Physics, Rostov State Transport University, Narodnogo Opolcheniya Sq., 344038 Rostov-on-Don, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2020, 10(9), 732; https://doi.org/10.3390/min10090732
Submission received: 10 July 2020 / Revised: 7 August 2020 / Accepted: 18 August 2020 / Published: 19 August 2020

Abstract

:
In this work, a series of comparative studies for the effect of the nine commercially available cationic, amphoteric and nonionic surfactants on the structure and wettability of the montmorillonite based organoclays were performed. The pristine and modified clays were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy, and water contact angle (CA) measurements. It has been observed that the maximum basal spacing and the hydrophobicity of the organoclays increased with the alkyl chain length and chain number of the surfactant. It was found out that this effect is most pronounced when using cationic surfactants. The maximum value of contact angle corresponded to the organoclay obtained using di(hydrogenated tallow) ammonium chloride (DDA). The outcomes of this study are important and relevant to the preparation of effective organoclays for geotechnical, petroleum and polymer nanocomposite applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

A lot of technological processes and applications are based on the regulation of the surface properties of clay minerals by means of modification with surface-active substances (surfactants) [1]. In this case, the role of surfactants is reduced mostly to a decrease in hydrophilicity and surface energy of clay particles; surfactants also cause an increase in the volume of galleries due to an increase in the interlayer distance (for minerals with a laminar structure) [2]. While preparing polymer nanocomposites based on both polar and nonpolar polymers, special attention is given to the selection of the surfactants used for organomodification of clays [3,4]. The specific chemisorption of the surfactants on the surface of clay minerals allows improving the adhesive interaction at the phase boundary of the polymer matrix and inorganic filler particles. This supports a uniform distribution of clay particles in the volume of the polymer matrix, providing improved mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties of finite nanocomposites [5]. Organomodification of surfactant clays plays a very important role in oil production technologies. In particular, surfactants are used in drilling for hydrophobization of clay-bearing rocks which are components of bore hole walls [6]. This lessens the interaction of these areas with water and decreases permeability of the wellbore walls, and also inhibits clay swelling [7,8]. Technologies for soil stabilization for geotechnical purposes are based on hydrophobization of the surface of hydrophilic clay minerals with surfactants [9]. The correct choice of surfactants and processing of clays with their help ensures a change in the consistency and plasticity limits of soils, an increase in its density, and a reduction in its heaving, swelling and soaking [10,11].
Currently, immense experimental material on the interaction of clay minerals with surfactants has been accumulated [1,2,12,13]. In particular, the researchers have widely studied the effect of various surfactants on the pore structure and adsorption characteristics of clay minerals [14,15], and their morphology [16]. They have also analyzed the structure and thermal stability of organically modified clays (organoclay) depending on the type of surfactant and the capacity of cation exchange of minerals [17,18,19]. At the same time, the base regularities of the influence of surfactants on the wettability of clay minerals by water have been established only for individual substances [20,21,22]. Yet, systematic comparative studies of the hydrophobic action of surfactants of various kinds have not been carried out. That is why the purpose of this work is to study the regularities of the modifying action (in terms of hydrophobicity) of various commercially available cationic, amphoteric, and nonionic surfactants toward clay minerals of the smectite group and to characterize their structure.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

In this study, homoionic sodium forms of montmorillonite SWy-2 from Wyoming (Na+-Mt) were used as clay materials. Na+-Mt was purchased from the Source Clays Repository of the Clay Minerals Society (Purdue University, USA) and was used without pretreatment. The chemical composition of Na+-Mt is (wt.%) SiO2—61.46; Al2O3—22.05; Fe2O3—4.37; TiO2—0.09; MgO—2.94; CaO—1.18; Na2O—1.47; K2O—0.20 [23]. The crystallochemical formula of this sample is (Ca0.12Na0.32K0.05) [Al3.01Fe(III)0.41Mn0.01Mg0.54Ti0.02][Si7.98Al0.02]O20(OH)4 [23]. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the Na+-Mt is 85 meq/100 g [24]. Nine types of surfactants (including of cationic, amphoteric and nonionic ones) were purchased from Scientific Manufacturing Enterprise “ENPAV” (Volgodonsk, Russia). The chemical structures of these surfactants are shown in Figure 1. A brief description of surfactants used in this study are provided in Table 1.

2.2. Preparation of Samples

The samples of surfactant-modified clays were prepared as described by Lazorenko et al. [20]. First, the non-pretreatment Na+-Mt (10 g) was dispersed in 1000 mL of deionized water under continuous stirring at 25 °C for 12 h. Then, modifying agent (1.0 CEC of montmorillonite) was gradually added and the mixture was stirred at 1200 rpm for 24 h at 60 °C until the modification was accomplished. After that, the mixture was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 5 min and washed by deionized water five times to remove excess surfactant. The sediment of organically modified clay was dried at 60 °C for 12 h and ground in an agate mortar. The dried organoclays were stored in a desiccator before analysis. The different samples (clay and organoclays) prepared in this work were ten in total.

2.3. Characterization

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of pristine and surfactant-modified clays were obtained with X-ray diffractometer D/Max-2200 (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) using CuKα radiation (n = 1.5418 Å). Operating mode: current 30 mA, voltage 40 kV, scan range 0.8°–10° 2theta, scanning step 0.01° 2theta, divergence slit 0.25°, anti-scatter slit 0.25°, exposure 20 s at a point, scintillation counter, graphite monochromator. Samples were prepared from dry powders by punching into cuvettes using pressure to obtain relatively oriented preparations. XRD data of the samples were used to analyze the change of basal spacings (d001) before and after modification. Attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectra of the samples were recorded with an ALPHA-E spectrometer with a zinc selenide (ZnSe) crystal cell (Bruker Optik GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) used in [25]. All spectra were obtained by averaging 50 scans at 2 cm−1 resolution over the mid-infrared spectral range of 500–4000 cm−1. Contact angle (CA, θ) measurements were conducted by using a sessile drop method in order to determine the wettability of the samples. For static CA measurements, a droplet of deionized water was placed on the top surface of pelletized powder sample pressed at a pressure of 300 kg/cm2 in a cylindrical form of stainless steel (5 mm in thickness, ∅20 mm) and θ was measured in 2–3 min after the drop of water was deposited. The droplet parameters were measured using a stereoscopic microscope MBS-10 (Lytkarino Optical Glass Factory, Moscow, Russia). A series of 3 measurements was taken for each test sample.

3. Results and Discussion

XRD patterns and FTIR spectra of unmodified Na+-Mt and organoclay prepared on its basis are presented in Figure 2. Figure 3 shows the measured average values of θ for all samples those are compared with the maximum basal spacing, as well as the lengths and amount of hydrocarbon radicals (R) in the molecules of the used surfactants. In the air-dry state, unmodified clay gives a reflection corresponding to an interlayer distance of 1.19 nm (Figure 2a) which is typical for the sodium form of Wyoming montmorillonite [26]. The asymmetric broadening of the d001 reflection indicates poor crystallinity of the mineral, swelling heterogeneity and different hydration states [27]. After modifying of montmorillonite with the surfactant, a shift of the maximum to a small-angle region is observed for all organoclay, which indicates the displacement of Na+ ions from exchange positions and the introduction of an organic modifier in the mineral galleries. The absence of a peak of montmorillonite at 2theta = 7.4° (1.19 nm) in the diffraction patterns of organoclay indicates the overall completion of the intercalation process. The basal (d001) spacing organoclay Na+-Mt/CTA, Na+-Mt/ATA and Na+-Mt/ABDA intercalated with cationic surfactants with one alkyl chain (C16, C16-C18, C16-C18), as well as Na+-Mt/DA and Na+-Mt/DDA (C10 × 2R and C18-16 × 2R) intercalated by cationic surfactants with two alkyl chains were 1.88, 1.92, 2.05, 2.05, and 2.67 nm, respectively (Figure 2a, Figure 3). Obviously, the position of the 001 reflection goes up with increasing length and number of alkyl chains. The relationship of the number of carbons in the alkyl chain with the basal distance d001 was found earlier in He et al. [17], Shah et al. [22], and Açışlı et al. [28]. A similar pattern of increasing d001 when prolonging the alkyl chain length is also observed in the case of organoclay Na+-Mt/LMB (C12-C14), Na+-Mt/CPB (C8-C18) and Na+-Mt/OPB (C12-C18) intercalated with amphoteric surfactants. The d-values in this case were 2.10, 4.61 and 4.65 nm, respectively (Figure 2a and Figure 3). It can be seen that the maximum values of d001 are obtained when short-chain hydrocarbon radicals are present in the surfactant structure along with long-chain fragments of C18. Large intercalation of both CPB and OPB can be explained by the mutual repulsion of negatively charged carboxyl groups of these betaines, which, together with the relatively large size of the molecules of these surfactants, leads to a large distance between the montmorillonite layers. Similar results were also observed in the work of McLauchlin and Thomas (2008), who studied the structure of organoclays based on an amphoteric surfactant depending on the surfactant concentration and pH of the medium [26].
Based on previous studies [1], it is possible to correlate the observed d-value of organoclay and orientations of surfactant molecules in the interlayer space of montmorillonite. Basal spacing of 1.84–2.10 nm indicates lateral bilayer or pseudotrimolecular layer arrangement; that is, an alkyl chain lying parallel to the mineral layer. At the same time, the maximum basal spacing of 4.61 and 4.65 nm in the case of intercalation of betaines indicate a paraffin-type bilayer arrangement. In the case of Na+-Mt/CAP and Na+-Mt/OAP, except the intense first reflection, the second maximum appears at the diffraction pattern at 2θ = 3.9°, which may be due to the presence of a lateral bilayer or pseudotrimolecular layer arrangement (Figure 2a). Basing on the results of studies by McLauchlin and Thomas (2008) [26], it can be assumed that the formation of two types of layer arrangement in organoclays prepared using betaines is connected with the nature of the hydrophilic end-groups of these surfactants. The negatively charged carboxyl groups of betaines repulse each other, resulting in a wider spacing between the montmorillonite layers. In turn, protonated carboxyl groups are more prone to associate through a hydrogen bond, leading to less significant separation of the layers.
Given the presence of two alkyl chains in the structure of the DDA molecule, the basal distance of 2.67 nm Na+-Mt/DDA probably corresponds to a lateral bilayer conformation turning into an inclined paraffin-type bilayer structure. Here the alkyl chains are oriented at an acute angle (less than 35°) relative to the plane of the montmorillonite layer [29]. It should be noted that a d001 value of 1.84 nm for Na+-Mt/ADA (C12-C18) with a nonionic surfactant is significantly lower than the d-value for amphoteric surfactant-modified clays Na+-Mt/CPB (C8-C18) and Na+-Mt/OPB having hydrocarbon radicals of the same length. This is due to differences in the nature of the binding of the head-group surfactants to the Na+-Mt surface, conformational ordering and interlayer packing density of intercalated surfactants within the clay interlayers.
An analysis of these features is possible by the position –CH2 stretching (3000–2800 cm−1), bending (1480–1450 cm−1), and rocking (740–710 cm−1) modes (Table 2) appearing on the FTIR spectra of modified clays (Figure 2b). On the whole, the IR spectrum of the obtained sodium form of Wyoming montmorillonite corresponds to the structure described in previous research [30]. The intercalated chains of ADA, as well as short-chain DA, form a more disordered liquid-like structure due to an increase in gauche/trans conformer ratio. This is indicated by the shift of antisymmetric CH2 stretching mode to the high-frequency region of the spectrum up to 2927 cm−1 (Figure 2b, Table 2) [31,32].
With increasing chain length, the νasCH2 band shifts toward lower wave numbers, which indicates a decrease in the number of disordered (gauche) conformation and the formation of ordered (all-trans) conformation. Reducing the number of gauche conformations with a curved spatial configuration of the chain contributes to the growth of interlayer packing density [1]. From the data given in Table 2, it can be seen that the highest ordering of the structure and packing density of intercalated surfactants corresponds to Na+-Mt/DDA. The position of the νasCH2 band most sensitive to conformational changes in the IR spectra of Na+-Mt/DDA is shifted to 2922 cm−1. A similar tendency to shift to lower wave numbers in the spectrum of Na+-Mt/DDA is also observed for CH2 rocking deformation and symmetric CH2 stretching oscillations. This observation correlates with the measured values of the contact angles, where Na+-Mt/DDA showed the highest hydrophobicity (θ~100°) (Figure 3).
The hydrophobic activity of DDA is also visible by the decrease in the intensity of the interlayer water bands 3401 (νOH) and 1635 cm−1 (δOH) (Figure 2b) which is associated with the penetration of the modifier molecules into the Na+-Mt galleries. This feature is also observed on the spectra of other organoclays. In case of Na+-Mt/LMP, Na+-Mt/CAP and Na+-Mt/OAP, the OH bending band of water molecules is close to the COO-stretching band of head-group amphoteric surfactants (1634 cm−1).
When the Na+ -Mt surface is wetted by deionized water, an increase in the contact angles is observed with an extension in the length of the alkyl chain and d-value. Moreover, surfactants with two alkyl chains provide hydrophobization of the surface more effectively than surfactants with one chain. It is seen that cationic surfactants having the best ability for chemisorption on the electronegative surface of clay have the greatest hydrophobizing effect. Amphoteric and nonionic surfactants do not show specificity in relation to Na+-Mt in the hydrophobic action. Both types of surfactants cause comparable hydrophobization of the surface of montmorillonite.

4. Conclusions

The hydrophobizing effect of cationic, amphoteric, and nonionic surfactants on organoclay based on sodium montmorillonite was studied. It was demonstrated that in all cases an increase in the water contact angle was observed, and the degree of hydrophobization depended both on the nature of the surfactant and on the length and number of alkyl chains in their structure. It was found out that this effect is most pronounced when using cationic surfactants. The maximum value of θ (~100°) corresponded to the organoclay obtained using di (hydrogenated tallow) ammonium chloride, which can probably be achieved by a high packing density and ordering of DDA molecules in the interparticle or interlayer space of the clay. The outcomes of this study are important and relevant to the preparation of effective organo-modified clays for geotechnical, petroleum and polymer nanocomposite applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.L.; methodology, G.L. and A.K.; investigation, A.K.; resources, A.K.; data curation, A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, G.L.; writing—review and editing, V.Y.; visualization, A.K.; project administration, G.L.; funding acquisition, G.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Grant No. 19-79-10266).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Victoria Krupskaya (Belov Laboratory of Mineral Cristallochemistry, Institute of Ore Deposits, Petrography, Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Russian Academy of Science) for her support with the XRD analytical aspects of this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. De Paiva, L.B.; Morales, A.R.; Valenzuela Díaz, F.R. Organoclays: Properties, preparation and applications. Appl. Clay Sci. 2008, 42, 8–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lagaly, G.; Ogawa, M.; Dékány, I. Clay mineral-organic interactions. In Developments in Clay Science, 2nd ed.; Bergaya, F., Lagaly, G., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; Volume 5, pp. 435–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kotal, M.; Bhowmick, A.K. Polymer nanocomposites from modified clays: Recent advances and challenges. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2015, 51, 127–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kruglikov, A.; Vasilchenko, A.; Kasprzhitskii, A.; Lazorenko, G. Atomic-level understanding of interface interactions in a halloysite nanotubes-PLA nanocomposite. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 39505–39514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Zhu, T.T.; Zhou, C.H.; Kabwe, F.B.; Wu, Q.Q.; Li, C.S.; Zhang, J.R. Exfoliation of montmorillonite and related properties of clay/polymer nanocomposites. Appl. Clay Sci. 2019, 169, 48–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Negin, C.; Ali, S.; Xie, Q. Most common surfactants employed in chemical enhanced oil recovery. Petroleum 2017, 3, 197–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Murtaza, M.; Kamal, M.S.; Hussain, S.M.S.; Mahmoud, M.; Syed, N.A. Quaternary ammonium gemini surfactants having different spacer length as clay swelling inhibitors: Mechanism and performance evaluation. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 308, 113054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ghasemi, M.; Moslemizadeh, A.; Shahbazi, K.; Mohammadzadeh, O.; Zendehboudi, S.; Jafari, S. Primary evaluation of a natural surfactant for inhibiting clay swelling. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2019, 178, 878–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lazorenko, G.; Kasprzhitskii, A.; Khakiev, Z.; Yavna, V. Dynamic behavior and stability of soil foundation in heavy haul railway tracks: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 205, 111–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Estabragh, A.R.; Babalar, M.; Javadi, A.A.; Afsari, E. Impacts of heating and surfactant treatments on the geotechnical properties of a cohesive soil. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2018, 144, 909–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shah, M.V.; Pandya, H.J.; Shukla, A.D. Influence of Chemical Additives on Shrinkage and Swelling Characteristics of Bentonite Clay. Procedia Eng. 2017, 189, 932–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhuang, G.; Zhang, Z.; Jaber, M. Organoclays used as colloidal and rheological additives in oil-based drilling fluids: An overview. Appl. Clay Sci. 2019, 177, 63–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Awad, A.M.; Shaikh, S.M.R.; Jalab, R.; Gulied, M.H.; Nasser, M.S.; Benamor, A.; Adham, S. Adsorption of organic pollutants by natural and modified clays: A comprehensive review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 228, 115719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, C.-C.; Juang, L.-C.; Lee, C.-K.; Hsu, T.-C.; Lee, J.-F.; Chao, H.-P. Effects of exchanged surfactant cations on the pore structure and adsorption characteristics of montmorillonite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 280, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. He, H.; Zhou, Q.; Martens, W.N.; Kloprogge, T.J.; Yuan, P.; Xi, Y.; Zhu, J.; Frost, R.L. Microstructure of HDTMA+-modified montmorillonite and its influence on sorption characteristics. Clays Clay Miner. 2006, 54, 689–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. He, H.; Frost, R.L.; Bostrom, T.; Yuan, P.; Duong, L.; Yang, D.; Xi, Y.; Kloprogge, J.T. Changes in the morphology of organoclays with HDTMA+ surfactant loading. Appl. Clay Sci. 2006, 31, 262–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. He, H.; Ma, Y.; Zhu, J.; Yuan, P.; Qing, Y. Organoclays prepared from montmorillonites with different cation exchange capacity and surfactant configuration. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 48, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cervantes-Uc, J.M.; Cauich-Rodríguez, J.V.; Vázquez-Torres, H.; Garfias-Mesías, L.F.; Paul, D.R. Thermal degradation of commercially available organoclays studied by TGA-FTIR. Thermochim. Acta. 2007, 457, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Calderon, J.U.; Lennox, B.; Kamal, M.R. Thermally stable phosphonium-montmorillonite organoclays. Appl. Clay Sci. 2008, 40, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lazorenko, G.; Kasprzhitskii, A.; Yavna, V. Synthesis and structural characterization of betaine- and imidazoline-based organoclays. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2018, 692, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Monteiro, M.K.S.; de Oliveira, V.R.L.; dos Santos, F.K.G.; de Barros Neto, E.L.; de Lima Leite, R.H.; Aroucha, E.M.M.; de Oliveira Silva, K.N. Influence of the ionic and nonionic surfactants mixture in the structure and properties of the modified bentonite clay. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 272, 990–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shah, K.J.; Mishra, M.K.; Shukla, A.D.; Imae, T.; Shah, D.O. Controlling wettability and hydrophobicity of organoclays modified with quaternary ammonium surfactants. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 407, 493–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mermut, A.R.; Cano, A.F. Baseline studies of the Clay Minerals Society source clays: Chemical analyses of major elements. Clays Clay. Miner. 2001, 49, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Borden, D.; Giese, R.F. Baseline studies of the Clay Minerals Society source clays: Cation exchange capacity measurements by the ammonia-electrode method. Clays Clay. Miner. 2001, 49, 444–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kasprzhitskii, A.; Lazorenko, G.; Khater, A.; Yavna, V. Mid-infrared spectroscopic assessment of plasticity characteristics of clay soils. Minerals 2018, 8, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. McLauchlin, A.R.; Thomas, N.L. Preparation and characterization of organoclays based on an amphoteric surfactant. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 321, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Holmboe, M.; Wold, S.; Jonsso, M. Porosity investigation of compacted bentonite using XRD profile modeling. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2012, 128, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Açışlı, Ö.; Karaca, S.; Gürses, A. Investigation of the alkyl chain lengths of surfactants on their adsorption by montmorillonite (Mt) from aqueous solutions. Appl. Clay Sci. 2017, 142, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, L.; Zhu, L. Structures of OTMA- and DODMA-bentonite and their sorption characteristics towards organic compounds. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 331, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Madejová, J.; Komadel, P. Baseline studies of the clay minerals society source clays: Infrared methods. Clays Clay Miner. 2001, 49, 410–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Slaný, M.; Jankovič, Ľ.; Madejová, J. Structural characterization of organo-montmorillonites prepared from a series of primary alkylamines salts: Mid-IR and near-IR study. Appl. Clay Sci. 2019, 176, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, Q.; Frost, R.L.; He, H.; Xi, Y. Changes in the surfaces of adsorbed p-nitrophenol on methyltrioctadecylammonium bromide organoclay-An XRD, TG, and infrared spectroscopic study. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 314, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the used surfactants.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the used surfactants.
Minerals 10 00732 g001
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns and (b) attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared (ATR/FTIR) spectra of sodium montmorillonite (Na+-Mt) and its organomodified forms with different surfactants.
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns and (b) attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared (ATR/FTIR) spectra of sodium montmorillonite (Na+-Mt) and its organomodified forms with different surfactants.
Minerals 10 00732 g002
Figure 3. The relationship between organoclay types, their wettability, d-spacing and alkyl chain length (number) of surfactant. Note: R—alkyl chain.
Figure 3. The relationship between organoclay types, their wettability, d-spacing and alkyl chain length (number) of surfactant. Note: R—alkyl chain.
Minerals 10 00732 g003
Table 1. The properties of used surfactants.
Table 1. The properties of used surfactants.
AbbreviationFull NameImpuritiesMolecular Weight (g/mol)CAS Number
DADidecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride30% ethanol362.17173-51-5
DDADi(hydrogenated tallow) dimethylammonium chloride25% isopropanol558.461789-80-8
CTACetrimonium chloride50% ethanol320.0112-02-7
ATAAlkyl trimethyl ammonium chloride50% ethanolN.R.61788-78-1
ADBAAlkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride50% ethanol311.963449-41-2
LMBLauryl myristyl betaine70% water271.466455-29-6
CPBCocamidopropyl betaine63% water342.561789-40-0
OPBOleylamidopropyl betaine70% water424.76436555
ADAAlkyl dimethylamine oxide70% water271.568955-55-5
N.R. = none reported.
Table 2. Assignment of the main absorption bands in FTIR spectra of organoclays.
Table 2. Assignment of the main absorption bands in FTIR spectra of organoclays.
AssignmentWavenumber (cm−1)
Na+-Mt/DANa+-Mt/DDANa+-Mt/CTANa+-Mt/ATANa+-Mt/ABDANa+-Mt/ADANa+-Mt/LMBNa+-Mt/CPBNa+-Mt/OPB
Antisymmetric CH2 stretching292729222925292529232927292429232923
Symmetric CH2 stretching285128502847284828502851285028532853
COO stretching163413641634
CH2 bending146714671471147114681471147014681463
CH2 rocking728720727727730726723721721
“‒” = No absorption bands.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lazorenko, G.; Kasprzhitskii, A.; Yavna, V. Comparative Study of the Hydrophobicity of Organo-Montmorillonite Modified with Cationic, Amphoteric and Nonionic Surfactants. Minerals 2020, 10, 732. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10090732

AMA Style

Lazorenko G, Kasprzhitskii A, Yavna V. Comparative Study of the Hydrophobicity of Organo-Montmorillonite Modified with Cationic, Amphoteric and Nonionic Surfactants. Minerals. 2020; 10(9):732. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10090732

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lazorenko, Georgy, Anton Kasprzhitskii, and Victor Yavna. 2020. "Comparative Study of the Hydrophobicity of Organo-Montmorillonite Modified with Cationic, Amphoteric and Nonionic Surfactants" Minerals 10, no. 9: 732. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10090732

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop