Next Article in Journal
Reversible Dual-Image-Based Hiding Scheme Using Block Folding Technique
Next Article in Special Issue
The Selection of Wagons for the Internal Transport of a Logistics Company: A Novel Approach Based on Rough BWM and Rough SAW Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Intelligent Aggregation Based on Content Routing Scheme for Cloud Computing
Open AccessArticle

Evaluation of Airplane Boarding/Deboarding Strategies: A Surrogate Experimental Test

1
College of Transportation and Logistics, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China
2
School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2017, 9(10), 222; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9100222
Received: 15 September 2017 / Revised: 1 October 2017 / Accepted: 9 October 2017 / Published: 11 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Civil Engineering and Symmetry)
Optimally organizing passengers boarding/deboarding an airplane offers a potential way to reduce the airplane turn time. The main contribution of our work is that we evaluate seven boarding strategies and two structured deboarding strategies by using a surrogate experimental test. Instead of boarding a real or mocked airplane, we carried out the experiment by organizing 40 participants to board a school bus with ten rows of four seats, symmetrically distributed on a single, central aisle. Experimental results confirm that the optimized strategies, i.e., Steffen and Steffen-lug, are superior to the traditional ones, i.e., Back-to-front, Window-to-aisle, and Random in time-saving and stability. However, the two structured deboarding strategies failed to reduce the deboarding time, and this result strongly suggests the prerequisites of applying such strategies only when, on average, passengers have a large amount of luggage. Besides, we further carried out a questionnaire survey of participants’ preferences on seat layout and discussed how those preferences influence the boarding time. View Full-Text
Keywords: airplane turn time; boarding/deboarding strategies; seat preference; experimental test airplane turn time; boarding/deboarding strategies; seat preference; experimental test
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiang, S.; Jia, B.; Huang, Q. Evaluation of Airplane Boarding/Deboarding Strategies: A Surrogate Experimental Test. Symmetry 2017, 9, 222.

AMA Style

Qiang S, Jia B, Huang Q. Evaluation of Airplane Boarding/Deboarding Strategies: A Surrogate Experimental Test. Symmetry. 2017; 9(10):222.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiang, Shengjie; Jia, Bin; Huang, Qingxia. 2017. "Evaluation of Airplane Boarding/Deboarding Strategies: A Surrogate Experimental Test" Symmetry 9, no. 10: 222.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop