Abstract
For a given starlike function , the class is defined as follows: an analytic normalized function f belongs to if it satisfies in the open unit disk . The condition defining this class can be rewritten in the following equivalent form . The family is a subclass of the class of close-to-convex functions. The main aim of this paper is to maximize the modulus of a functional which is a linear combination with coefficients symmetric with respect to zero and is defined on the subfamily of of functions with a fixed second coefficient in its Taylor series expansion.
Keywords:
close-to-convex function; coefficient problems; successive coefficients; bounds of the coefficient functionals MSC:
30C45
1. Introduction
Let be the class of functions f analytic in the open unit disc normalized by the condition . Each function f belonging to the class has the Taylor series expansion
The class of analytic functions of the form
having a positive real part in (called Carathéodory functions) will be denoted by . Further, by we denote the subclass of consisting of univalent starlike functions i.e., functions such that in the unit disc .
A function that satisfies condition is said to be a convex function. By we denote the so-called class of close-to-convex functions, that is, the subclass of which consists of functions f that satisfy with some convex function g (see [,]). The topic of close-to-convex functions is still a topic of interest for researchers (see, for example, [,,,]).
For given and the classes are defined as follows ([]): a function belongs to if
Such a function f will be called close-to-convex with argument with respect to g. Let
It is obvious that
By varying the function g and the real parameter in (3), we obtain some interesting subfamilies of the class . For example,
(i) By selecting the class leads to the family that was introduced by Lecko in 1994 [] and has been extensively examined (see [,,]). This family contains the functions for which
(ii) If we take with , then we obtain the family
for which the Fekete–Szegö functional was studied in []. Note that for the class reduces to the family of close-to-convex functions with the argument 0 with respect to the well-known Koebe function . In [] bounds of the Fekete–Szegö type functionals of the form
and
were derived for the class . The same family of functions with some additional conditions was considered in [].
(iii) The family was recently examined by Zaprawa et al. in ([]). The authors pointed out that this class has an interesting symmetry property. Namely, if and then and the sets and are symmetrical to each other with respect to the real axis.
For we define the functions
which are starlike for all . Consider the class . Then (3) takes the form
It should be noted that becomes the class considered in []. Furthermore, if then where the symbol () stands for the class of analytic functions that satisfy the condition
The family was defined in 1989 [] (see also []).
Note that when the parameter is set, we obtain the already known classes. For example, if then the condition (6) takes the form
and, therefore, it defines the class of bounded turning (cf. [] Vol. 1, p. 101), while for the class reduces to this, examined in [].
Assume now that and We will show some examples of the members of the family . From the definition (6) of this class, it follows that if , then there exists that satisfies
By substituting selected functions from the class in place of q we can derive from (7) the functions f that are members of . It is obvious that complex homographies of the form with are Carathéodory functions. Hence, each of them can be used to generate the function . For example, if
then f related to this function q by the condition (7) is of the form
under assumptions that and Putting
in (7) we obtain another example of a function f from the class with and :
In this paper, we find estimates of some coefficient functionals in the special subclass of the class . Note that recently, there have been many articles on univalent functions with a fixed second coefficient in the Taylor series expansion. For example, Li and Sugawa in 2017 [] considered the class of convex functions with the second coefficient fixed, and Zaprawa et al. (see [,]) researched the classes and with the same additional assumption (see also []). Motivated by this idea, we will focus on the problem of maximizing selected coefficient functionals for with the second coefficient fixed.
Let be of the form (1). From the definition of the class it follows that
In other words
where . If the function q has the series expansion (2), then comparing the coefficients with the same powers of the variable z leads to the following equality
where . In particular, we obtain that
so . For a given number we define the subclass of with the second coefficient fixed, , as follows
Therefore, if , then
2. Auxiliary Lemmas
In this section, some results are collected on the coefficients of the functions belonging to the Carathéodory class . We start with the result known as Carathéodory–Toeplitz theorem (see for example []).
Lemma 1
(Carathéodory–Toeplitz theorem). If q has the power series expansion of the form with then if and only if the Toeplitz determinants
where (), are non-negative for all . Moreover, if for each and if , then the function q is of the form:
As we can see, the function q in (15) is a linear combination of special complex homographies. Note that from it follows that the coefficients of this combination satisfy
The Carathéodory–Toeplitz theorem is a very good tool for creating examples of Carathéodory functions. For example, let us consider a special case of the Toeplitz determinant
If are both real, then takes the form and, consequently, if and only if or . Using Lemma 1, Li and Sugawa [] put the following assertion related to the latter case.
Lemma 2.
Let and with and Then, q has a form
Remark 1.
In [] the authors noticed that if with and , then
where is some constant.
Lemma 3.
Let and with and . Then, q is of the form
Proof.
The next lemma is due to Libera and Złotkiewicz ([,]) and has also been proven by using the Carathéodory–Toeplitz theorem.
Lemma 4
([,]). If is given by (2), then
for some x and y such that .
Remark 2.
Observe that when (i) in the Lemma 4 occurs with then the assumption with in the Lemma 2 is satisfied. Therefore, the form of q can be obtained by Lemma 2. If condition (i) holds with , that is, with , then the assumptions in the Lemma 3 are satisfied. Consequently, we have the function q of the form (18).
If we put q of the form (16) or (18) in the correspondence (7) then we obtain two functions from the class with the following series expansions, respectively
and
The next lemma can be obtained as a special case of the result due to Choi, Kim and Sugawa []. Let us define
Lemma 5.
If , then
where
If , then
3. Difference of Successive Coefficients
Let us begin this section by recalling the relationship between the coefficients of functions from the classes and :
Combining these dependencies for successive n we obtain
and generally
and
We rewrite the above equalities in a more convenient and clear form. For we have
and
For of the form (1) we define the coefficient functional that we will deal with in what follows:
Note that is a linear combination of and with coefficients that are symmetric with respect to 0.
Using (25) and (26) we derive the formulas for for a function separately for n even and n odd. For we obtain
while for we obtain
In this section, we will concentrate on the problem of maximizing the modulus of for . For the class , i.e., for , the same problem was studied in ([], Zaprawa, Tra̧bka–Wiȩcław) and the following sharp inequalities for and were given
and
Let be fixed. In the following theorem, we derive the estimates of for the class .
Theorem 1.
Proof.
If , then
for some function . If h has the series expansion (2), then comparing the coefficients on both sides, we obtain
This gives
where are fixed, , , and is a second coefficient of the function . Therefore, by Lemma 4, we obtain
for some . Note that if , then the maximum of the expression on the right side of the above equality is reached for . If , then it is reached for . The square trinomial has two roots
Elementary computing shows that for all the first one is an interior point of the interval and the second one is outside of . Hence, (32) immediately follows.
We can derive several corollaries from the above theorem. For example, for we have and in this case Theorem 1 yields the following
Corollary 1.
If , has the form (1), then
For we have and Theorem 1 reduces to the following result for the class of functions of bounded turning with the second coefficient fixed. Let us denote this class by .
Corollary 2.
If , has the form (1), then
Finally note that if , then and Theorem 1 yields the result of [] which was recalled in (30).
Let us now turn to the estimates of the functional . We start with the results in the classes with specific values of the parameter. If , then we have . For class , we have the following result.
Theorem 2.
If , has the form (1), then the following inequalities hold
where is the unique root of the polynomial in the interval .
Proof.
By using (25) and (26) we obtain for
Applying Lemma 4 results in the following equality
for some x, y such that and and where . From this, we obtain at once that for as for , an estimate holds. In case the equality holds for the function given by (19) with and , that is, for . In case the equality is realized by the function given by (20) with and , that is, by .
Now, assume that . Further, after computing and simplifying, we obtain from the last equality that
where
Now, we will apply Lemma 5. For , we have . Moreover, some calculations show that each of the following conditions from Lemma 5 is false in this case:
It follows at once that for
with given by (35). After calculating we obtain that
Now, let . We have to consider two cases here because, in each of them, Lemma 5 will be used in a different form. Namely, if then we have
while for :
By Lemma 5 and after some computation we obtain for :
and hence the appropriate result of Theorem 2 yields. If then we compute that
and the result follows. Now, consider the case . Then, we have
Thus, we obtain
The interval also has to be broken into two parts. If , where is the only root of the polynomial in the interval , then
and consequently,
However, for we have
So then
which gives the same result as we had in the previously considered interval. Finally, we have to deal with the case, if . Then,
This results in the following inequality:
□
In the next theorem, we derive the bounds of for the class .
Theorem 3.
If then the following inequalities hold
where is the only root of the polynomial in the interval .
Proof.
From Lemma 4:
for some x, y such that and . For and , we immediately obtain and , respectively. The equalities in these bounds are realized by the functions and , respectively.
Let . Then, after some calculations we obtain
where
We will apply Lemma 5. For we have and none of the conditions
of Lemma 5 are satisfied. Let us denote by the only root of the polynomial
in the interval . After some computation we can check that for the inequalities
are false. Then, from Lemma 5 we obtain
with given by (38). This gives the first result of Theorem 3:
For we have . Therefore, from Lemma 5 we obtain in this case that
which implies the second estimate of our theorem.
Assume that . Then, we have
and consequently,
which gives the next bound.
If then the conditions
are satisfied. By Lemma 5 and after some computation we obtain for
In the last case, i.e., for we have
Therefore,
□
Now let us move on to the consideration of the investigated problem of estimation in the general case. Unfortunately, the result was not achieved in the full range of parameters, i.e., for all from the rectangle .
Theorem 4.
If and , then
Proof.
Note that if goes to zero, then the bound obtained from Theorem 4, coincides with what we got for in Theorem 3.
4. Conclusions
A key procedure leading to the results presented in this article was to relate the investigated class to the class of Carathéodory functions . The resulting relationship between the coefficients of both classes, combined with known estimates of the coefficients in the class and the use of Lemmas 4 and 5, allowed the studied coefficient functionals to be maximized. An interesting direction for future research seems to be the attempt to estimate other coefficient functionals, for example, some combinations of two successive coefficients or the sum of n initial coefficients of the Taylor series for functions in the studied class.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Acknowledgments
The author thanks the referees for their valuable suggestions to improve an earlier draft of this article.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
References
- Kaplan, W. Close to convex schlicht functions. Mich. Math. J. 1952, 1, 169–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodman, A.W.; Saff, E.B. On the definition of close-to-convex function. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 1978, 1, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunokawa, M.; Sokół, J.; Tra̧bka–Wiȩcław, K. Some remarks on close-to-convex and strongly convex functions. Math. Scand. 2015, 116, 309–319. [Google Scholar]
- Çağlar, M. The logarithmic coefficient inequality for close-to-convex functions of complex order. J. Math. Ineq. 2015, 9, 951–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunokawa, M.; Sokół, J. On the order of strong starlikeness and the radii of starlikeness for some close-to-convex functions. Anal. Math. Phys. 2019, 9, 2367–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, N.E.; Kowalczyk, B.; Kwon, O.S.; Lecko, A.; Sim, Y.J. On the third logarithmic coefficient in some subclasses of close-to-convex functions. Rev. Real Acad. Cienc. Exactas Físicas Nat. Ser. A Matemáticas 2020, 114, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lecko, A. On reciprocal dependence of some classes of regular functions. Folia Sci. Univ. Tech. Resov. 1994, 127, 35–53. [Google Scholar]
- Lecko, A. On a radius problem in some subclasses of univalent functions I. Folia Sci. Univ. Tech. Resov. 1996, 147, 35–54. [Google Scholar]
- Lecko, A.; Lecko, M. On a radius problem in some subclasses of univalent functions II. Folia Sci. Univ. Tech. Resov. 1996, 154, 73–87. [Google Scholar]
- Lecko, A. A generalization of analytic condition for convexity in one direction. Demonstr. Math. 1997, 30, 155–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kowalczyk, B.; Lecko, A. The Fekete–Szegö inequality for close-to-convex functions with respect to a certain starlike function dependent on a real parameter. J. Inequal. Appl. 2014, 2014, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tra̧bka–Wiȩcław, K.; Zaprawa, P.; Gregorczyk, M.; Rysak, A. On the Fekete–Szegö type functionals for close-to-convex functions. Symmetry 2019, 11, 1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaprawa, P. Succesive coefficients of close-to-convex functions. In Forum Mathematicum; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Zaprawa, P.; Tra̧bka–Wiȩcław, K. Estimates of coefficient functionals for functions convex in the imaginary-axis direction. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lecko, A. On some classes of close-to-convex functions. Folia Sci. Univ. Tech. Resov. 1989, 60, 61–70. [Google Scholar]
- Lecko, A. Some subclasses of close-to-convex functions. Ann. Pol. Math. 1993, 58, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodman, A.W. Univalent Functions; Mariner: Tampa, FL, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Li, M.; Sugawa, T. A note on successive coefficients of convex functions. Comput. Methods Funct. Theory 2017, 17, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, Z.; Obradović, M. The estimate of the difference of initial succesive coefficients of univalent functions. J. Math. Inequal. 2019, 13, 301–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grenander, U.; Szego, G. Toeplitz Forms and Their Applications; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA; Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1958. [Google Scholar]
- Libera, R.J.; Złotkiewicz, E.J. Coefficients bounds for the inverse of a function with derivative in P. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1983, 87, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Libera, R.J.; Złotkiewicz, E.J. Early coefficients of the inverse of a regular convex function. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1982, 85, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, J.H.; Kim, Y.C.; Sugawa, T. A general approach to the Fekete–Szegö problem. J. Math. Soc. Jpn. 2007, 59, 707–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).