Next Article in Journal
A Curvature-Based Three-Dimensional Defect Detection System for Rotational Symmetry Tire
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Symmetry in an Epidemiological Model: Numerical Analysis of Backward Bifurcation and Sensitivity Indices
Previous Article in Special Issue
On (p,q)-Analogs of the α-th Fractional Fourier Transform and Some (p,q)-Generalized Spaces
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel Family of q-Mittag-Leffler-Based Bessel and Tricomi Functions via Umbral Approach

1
Department of Electrical Engineering, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, P.O. Box 1664, Al Khobar 31952, Saudi Arabia
2
Mathematics Department, College of Science, Jouf University, P.O. Box 2014, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Mathematics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2024, 16(12), 1580; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16121580
Submission received: 30 September 2024 / Revised: 30 October 2024 / Accepted: 18 November 2024 / Published: 26 November 2024

Abstract

:
Many properties of special polynomials, such as recurrence relations, sum formulas, integral transforms and symmetric identities, have been studied in the literature with the help of generating functions and their functional equations. In this paper, we introduce hybrid forms of q-Mittag-Leffler functions. The q-Mittag-Leffler–Bessel and q-Mittag-Leffler–Tricomi functions are constructed using a q-symbolic operator. The generating functions, series definitions, q-derivative formulas and q-recurrence formulas for q-Mittag-Leffler–Bessel and q-Mittag-Leffler–Tricomi functions are obtained. The N q -transforms and N q -transforms of q-Mittag-Leffler–Bessel and q-Mittag-Leffler–Tricomi functions are obtained. These hybrid q-special functions are also studied by plotting their graphs for specific values of the indices and parameters.

1. Introduction

Symmetric identities for special functions often describe relationships between functions that exhibit symmetry in their arguments, which can simplify expressions or provide insights into their properties. These identities are powerful tools for simplifying integrals and series expansions and for solving differential equations involving special functions. For specific classes of q-special functions, the behavior under a change of the parameter q might reveal certain symmetry properties. Bessel functions of the first kind satisfy the symmetry identity, which reflects their even and odd properties under the transformation. The q-Bessel functions, which are deformations of the classical Bessel functions based on the quantum group parameter q, satisfy various symmetry relations. These functions arise in the study of q-special functions and are often used in contexts like quantum algebra, integrable systems, and statistical mechanics. These identities are powerful tools in understanding the structure of q-special functions and play a key role in many areas of mathematical research, from combinatorics to mathematical physics.
The q-calculus, or quantum calculus, is currently an essential topic that is very much relevant to the theory of special functions. There is growing interest in quantum calculus, primarily due to its applications in mathematical sciences, physics, and engineering. In recent years, hybrid forms of q-special functions and polynomials have been investigated by many researchers (see [1,2]).
We recall certain notations and preliminaries of the quantum theory to understand the work properly. For n N and q C { 1 } , the q-analogue of the factorial function is defined by [3,4]:
[ n ] q ! = m = 1 n [ m ] q = [ 1 ] q [ 2 ] q [ n ] q , [ 0 ] q ! = 1 ; 0 < q < 1 .
The corresponding q-exponential functions are defined as [3,4]:
e q ( u ) = n = 0 u n [ n ] q ! ,
E q ( u ) = n = 0 q n ( n 1 ) / 2 u n [ n ] q !
and
D ^ q , u e q ( α u ) = α e q ( α u ) , α C ,
where D ^ q , u is the q-derivative with respect to u. Also, the q-derivative of the product of two functions, g ( u ) and h ( u ) , is given by
D ^ q , u ( g ( u ) h ( u ) ) = g ( u ) D ^ q , u h ( u ) + h ( q u ) D ^ q , u g ( u ) .
The q-Jackson integrals are specified as [5]:
0 u f ( t ) d q t = u ( 1 q ) k = 0 q k f ( u q k )
0 / A f ( t ) d q t = ( 1 q ) k Z q k A f q k A .
The respective integral representations of q-gamma functions are given as [4]:
Γ q ( α ) = 0 1 / ( 1 q ) u ( α 1 ) E q ( q u ) d q u , α > 0 ,
Γ q ( α ) = K ( A ; α ) 0 / A ( 1 q ) u ( α 1 ) e q ( u ) d q u , α > 0 ,
where K ( A ; α ) is given as [4]:
K ( A ; α ) = A α 1 ( q / α ; q ) ( q t / α ; q ) ( α ; q ) ( α q 1 t ; q ) , α R .
The q-gamma functions Γ q ( α ) and Γ q ( α ) satisfy the following as [4]:
Γ q ( α ) = ( q ; q ) ( 1 q ) α 1 k = 0 q k α ( q ; q ) k = ( q ; q ) ( q α ; q ) ( 1 q ) 1 α ,
Γ q ( α ) = K ( A ; α ) ( 1 q ) α 1 ( ( 1 / A ) ; q ) k Z q k A α 1 A ; q k .
The q-Bessel functions of the first kind J n , q ( u ) are defined by following generating function [6,7]:
e q u t 2 e q u 2 t = n = J n , q ( u ) t n , t 0 , | u | <
Additionally, they have the following series representations:
J n , q ( u ) = 1 ( q ; q ) n k = 0 ( 1 ) k u 2 n + 2 k ( q ; q ) k ( q n + 1 ; q ) k ,
or, equivalently,
J n , q ( u ) = ( q n + 1 ; q ) ( q ; q ) k = 0 ( 1 ) k u 2 n + 2 k ( q ; q ) k ( q n + 1 ; q ) k ,
which converges absolutely for | u | < 2 .
The q-Tricomi functions C n , q ( u ) are defined as [2]:
e q ( t ) e q ( u t 1 ) = n = 0 C n , q ( u ) t n , t 0 ; | u | <
and
C n , q ( u ) = k = 0 ( 1 ) k u k [ k ] q ! [ n + k ] q ! .
The series given in Equation (5) converges absolutely for all values of u.
The q-Mittag-Leffler functions E q ( α , β ) ( u ) are defined as follows [8]:
E q ( α , β ) ( u ) = n = 0 u n Γ q ( α n + β ) , | u | < ( 1 q ) n , α , β R + .
In [1], authors established the q-Mittag-Leffler function in terms of symbolic definition as follows:
E q ( α , β ) ( u ) = e q u d ^ ( α , β ) q ψ 0 , q ,
where d ^ ( α , β ) q is the q-symbolic operator, acting on function ψ z , q = Γ q ( z + 1 ) / Γ q ( α z + β ) as
d ^ ( α , β ) q k ψ z , q = Γ q ( k + z + 1 ) Γ q ( α ( k + z ) + β ) , k R , k + z > 1
and
d ^ ( α , β ) q k ψ 0 , q = d ^ ( α , β ) q k ψ z , q | z = 0 = Γ q ( k + 1 ) Γ q ( α k + β ) , k R , k > 1 .
Here, the umbral images of the q-Bessel function J n , q ( u ) and 0th-order q-Tricomi-Bessel function C 0 , q ( u ) are defined as follows:
J n , q ( u ) = c ^ u 2 n e q c ^ u 2 2 ϕ 0 , q
and
C 0 , q ( u ) = e q c ^ u ϕ 0 , q , for all u R ,
respectively.
The q-Tricomi functions C n , q ( u ) are defined as
C n , q ( u ) = c ^ n e q c ^ u ϕ 0 , q , for all u R ,
where c ^ is the shift operator acting on vacuum function ϕ z , q = 1 Γ q ( z + 1 ) as
c ^ α ϕ z , q = 1 Γ q ( z + α + 1 ) , α C .
The symmetry of q-Tricomi functions, like many special functions, typically manifests in their behavior under transformations of variables or parameters. q-Tricomi functions may also exhibit symmetry in relation to other q-special functions. For instance, there might be symmetries with q-hypergeometric functions, q-Bessel functions, or other q-analogues of classical functions, and these symmetries can often be explored through their interrelations and recurrence properties. Symmetry may also manifest in the asymptotic behavior of the q-Tricomi function as certain parameters (such as q) or variables approach their limits.
Motivated by the significance of hybrid q-special functions in diverse fields, in this paper, q-Mittag-Leffler–Bessel and q-Mittag-Leffler–Tricomi functions are constructed in view of symbolic definitions. In Section 2, generating functions, series definitions, and other important properties of these hybrid q-special functions are established. Certain q-natural transforms of q-Mittag-Leffler–Bessel and q-Mittag-Leffler–Tricomi functions are explored in Section 3. In Section 4, q-derivative formulas and q-recurrence formulas are obtained. Using “Wolfram Mathematica”, q-Mittag-Leffler–Bessel and q-Mittag-Leffler–Tricomi functions are studied graphically in Section 5.

2. q-Mittag-Leffler–Bessel Functions and q-Mittag-Leffler–Tricomi Functions

In this section, q-Mittag-Leffler–Bessel functions (qMLBF), denoted by J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) , and q-Mittag-Leffler–Tricomi functions (qMLTF), denoted by C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) , are obtained through convolutions of q-Mittag-Leffler functions E q ( α , β ) ( u ) with q-Bessel functions J n , q ( u ) and q-Tricomi functions C n , q ( u ) , respectively, using a q-symbolic operator d ^ ( α , β ) q . With the help of relation (6), we receive umbral images of qMLBF J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) and qMLTF C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) as:
J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) = J n , q ( u d ^ ( α , β ) q ) ψ 0 , q .
Alternatively, in view of relation (8), it follows that
J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) = c ^ u d ^ ( α , β ) q 2 n e q c ^ u d ^ ( α , β ) q 2 2 ϕ 0 , q ψ 0 , q
and
C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) = C n , q ( u d ^ ( α , β ) q ) ψ 0 , q ,
or, in view of relation (9), we receive
C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) = c ^ n e q c ^ u d ^ ( α , β ) q ϕ 0 , q ψ 0 , q .
Theorem 1.
For t 0 , | u | < , the generating functions for qMLBF J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) and qMLTF C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) are given as
n = J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) t n = E q ( α , β ) u 2 t 1 t , if u 2 d ^ ( α , β ) q = q u 2 d ^ ( α , β ) q
and
n = C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) t n = e q ( t ) E q ( α , β ) u t , if u d ^ ( α , β ) q = q u d ^ ( α , β ) q ,
respectively.
Proof. 
Multiply both sides of Equation (11) by t n and, through taking the summation of both sides, we receive
n = J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) t n = n = J n , q ( u d ^ ( α , β ) q ) ψ 0 , q t n ,
which in view of relations (3) and (6), yields assertion (15).
Similarly, multiply both sides of Equation (13) by t n and, through taking the summation of both sides of the resultant equation and then using relations (4) and (6), assertion (16) is obtained.
Remark 1.
For t = 1 in Equation (15), we get
n = J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) = 1 .
Remark 2.
Taking n = 0 in Equations (12) and (14), it follows that
J 0 , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) = e q c ^ u d ^ ( α , β ) q 2 2 ϕ 0 , q ψ 0 , q ,
C 0 , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) = e q c ^ u d ^ ( α , β ) q ϕ 0 , q ψ 0 , q .
Theorem 2.
For α , β R , the following series definitions for qMLBF J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) and qMLTF C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) are given as
J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) = k = 0 n + 2 k k q ( 1 ) k ( u / 2 ) n + 2 k Γ q ( α ( n + 2 k ) + β )
and
C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) = k = 0 ( 1 ) k u k Γ q ( α k + β ) [ n + k ] q ! ,
respectively.
Proof. 
In Equation (12), we have
J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) = c ^ n u n d ^ ( α , β ) q n 2 n k = 0 ( c ^ ) k u 2 k d ^ ( α , β ) q 2 k [ k ] q ! 2 2 k ψ 0 , q ϕ 0 , q ,
which can be rewritten as
J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) = k = 0 ( 1 ) k u 2 n + 2 k [ k ] q ! c ^ n + k ϕ 0 , q d ^ ( α , β ) q n + 2 k ψ 0 , q .
In view of relations (7) and (10), assertion (21) is obtained. Similarly, through expanding the q-exponential function in Equation (14), we receive
C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) = c ^ n k = 0 ( c ^ ) k u k d ^ ( α , β ) q k [ k ] q ! ψ 0 , q ϕ 0 , q .
Using Equations (7) and (10) in Equation (25), we are led to assertion (22). □

3. Some q-Integral Transforms

The theory of q-integral transforms serves as a core part of q-calculus. The q-analogues of numerous classical integrals have been explored by many researchers (see, for example, [9,10,11,12]. The q-Laplace transforms of a product q-Bessel function are obtained in [12]. Furthermore, Omari [11] established q-analogues of the Natural transform of the first type on some set A 1 , which is defined as:
N q ( f ( t ) ) ( u ; v ) = 1 ( 1 q ) u 0 u v f ( t ) E q q v u t d q t ,
where A 1 is given by
A 1 = f ( t ) | M , τ 1 , τ 2 > 0 , | f ( t ) | < M E q | t | τ j , t ( 1 ) j × [ 0 , ) .
The q-analogues of the Natural transform of the second type are defined as [11]:
N q ( f ( t ) ) ( u ; v ) = 1 ( 1 q ) 0 f ( t ) e q v u t d q t ,
where A 2 is given by
A 2 = f ( t ) | M , τ 1 , τ 2 > 0 , | f ( t ) | < M e q | t | τ j , t ( 1 ) j × [ 0 , ) .
The series expansions for the N q -transform and N q -transform are given as [11]:
N q ( f ( t ) ) ( u ; v ) = ( q ; q ) v k = 0 q k ( q ; q ) k f q k u v ,
N q ( f ( t ) ) ( u ; v ) = 1 v u ; q k Z v u ; q k q k f ( q k ) .
Remark 3.
Taking u = 1 in Equations (26) and (28), the q-Laplace transforms of the function f ( t ) are obtained [13].
Theorem 3.
Let 0 < q < 1 ; u , v R + , ν C with R ( ν ) > 1 . Consider a t ν 1 -weighted product of n different qMLBF J 2 μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( 2 a j t ) , j = 1 , 2 , , n , then their N q -transform is given by
N q t ν 1 j = 1 n J 2 μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( 2 a j t ) ( u ; v ) = A ν , q j = 1 n m j = 0 2 μ j + 2 m j m j q ( 1 q ) u a j v μ j + m j × ( 1 ) m j Γ q ( ν + μ j + m j ) Γ q ( α ( 2 μ j + 2 m j ) + β ) ,
where A ν , q = u ν 1 v ν ( 1 q ) ν 1 and R e ( ν + μ j + m j ) > 0 .
Proof. 
Let f ( t ) = t ν 1 j = 1 n J 2 μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( 2 a j t ) in definition (30); we obtain
N q t ν 1 j = 1 n J 2 μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( 2 a j t ) ( u ; v ) = ( q ; q ) v k = 0 q k ( q ; q ) k q k u v ν 1 j = 1 n J 2 μ j , q ( α , β ) E 2 a j q k u v ,
which, through using relation (21), gives
N q t ν 1 j = 1 n J 2 μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( 2 a j t ) ( u ; v ) = ( q ; q ) v k = 0 j = 1 n m j = 0 q k ( q ; q ) k q k u v ν 1 × 2 μ j + 2 m j m j q ( 1 ) m j a j q k u v μ j + m j Γ q ( α ( 2 μ j + 2 m j ) + β )
Using relation (1) in Equation (34), and letting A ν , q = u ν 1 v ν ( 1 q ) ν 1 , we are led to assertion (32). □
Theorem 4.
Let 0 < q < 1 ; u , v R + , ν C with R ( ν ) > 1 . Consider a t ν 1 -weighted product of n different qMLBF J 2 μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( 2 a j t ) , j = 1 , 2 , , n ; then their N q -transform is given by
N q t ν 1 j = 1 n J 2 μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( 2 a j t ) ( u ; v ) = B ν , q j = 1 n m j = 0 2 μ j + 2 m j m j q ( 1 q ) u a j v μ j + m j × ( 1 ) m j Γ q ( ν + μ j + m j ) Γ q ( α ( 2 μ j + 2 m j ) + β ) K u v ; ν + μ j + m j ,
where B ν , q = u v ν ( 1 q ) ν 1 .
Proof. 
Let f ( t ) = t ν 1 j = 1 n J 2 μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( 2 a j t ) ; in definition (31), it follows that
N q t ν 1 j = 1 n J 2 μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( 2 a j t ) ( u ; v ) = 1 v u ; q k Z q k v u ; q k q k ( ν 1 ) j = 1 n J 2 μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( 2 a j q k )
and (21) becomes
N q t ν 1 j = 1 n J 2 μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( 2 a j t ) ( u ; v ) = 1 v u ; q k Z j = 1 n m j = 0 q k ν v u ; q k × 2 μ j + 2 m j m j q ( 1 ) m j a j q k μ j + m j Γ q ( α ( 2 μ j + 2 m j ) + β ) .
Using Equation (2) for A = u v in Equation (37), by performing some simplifications, assertion (35) is proven. □
Now, we give the N q -transforms and N q -transform for the qMLTF C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) .
Theorem 5.
Let 0 < q < 1 ; u , v R + , ν C with R ( ν ) > 1 . Consider a t ν 1 -weighted product of n different qMLTF C μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( a j t ) , j = 1 , 2 , , n , then their N q -transform is given by
N q t ν 1 j = 1 n C μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( a j t ) ( u ; v ) = A ν , q j = 1 n m j = 0 ( 1 q ) u a j v m j ( 1 ) m j Γ q ( ν + m j ) Γ q ( α m j + β ) [ μ j + m j ] q ! ,
where R e ( ν + m j ) > 0 and A ν , q is same as given in Theorem 3.
Proof. 
Letting f ( t ) = t ν 1 j = 1 n C μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( a j t ) in definition (30), we find
N q t ν 1 j = 1 n C μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( a j t ) ( u ; v ) = ( q ; q ) v k = 0 q k ( q ; q ) k q k u v ν 1 j = 1 n C μ j , q ( α , β ) E a j q k u v .
Using (22) becomes
N q t ν 1 j = 1 n C μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( a j t ) ( u ; v ) = ( q ; q ) v k = 0 j = 1 n m j = 0 q k ( q ; q ) k q k u v ν 1 × ( 1 ) m j a j q k u v m j Γ q ( α m j + β ) [ μ j + m j ] q ! .
Using relation (1) in Equation (40) and letting A ν , q = u ν 1 v ν ( 1 q ) ν 1 , we are led to assertion (38). □
Theorem 6.
Let 0 < q < 1 ; u , v R + , ν C with R ( ν ) > 1 . Consider a t ν 1 -weighted product of n different qMLTF C μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( a j t ) , j = 1 , 2 , , n , then their N q -transform is given by
N q t ν 1 j = 1 n C μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( a j t ) ( u ; v ) = B ν , q j = 1 n m j = 0 ( 1 ) m j ( 1 q ) u a j v m j Γ q ( ν + m j ) [ μ j + m j ] q ! Γ q ( α m j + β ) K u v ; ν + m j ,
where B ν , q is same as given in Theorem 4.
Proof. 
Let f ( t ) = t ν 1 j = 1 n C μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( a j t ) in definition (31), it follows that
N q t ν 1 j = 1 n C μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( a j t ) ( u ; v ) = 1 v u ; q k Z q k v u ; q k q k ( ν 1 ) j = 1 n C μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( a j q k ) .
Using Equation (22) becomes
N q t ν 1 j = 1 n C μ j , q ( α , β ) E ( a j t ) ( u ; v ) = 1 v u ; q k Z j = 1 n m j = 0 q k ν v u ; q k ( 1 ) m j a j q k m j [ μ j + m j ] q ! Γ q ( α m j + β ) .
Using Equation (2) for A = u v in Equation (43), and by performing some simplifications, assertion (41) is proven. □

Special Cases

Corollary 1.
In consideration of n = 1 , a 1 = a , m 1 = m and μ 1 = 1 2 in Theorem 3 and 4, the N q -transform and N q -transform for the qMLBF J 1 , q ( α , β ) E ( 2 a t ) are given as:
N q t ν 1 J 1 , q ( α , β ) E ( 2 a t ) ( u ; v ) = a v ( 1 q ) u v ν 1 2 m = 0 2 m + 1 m q ( 1 q ) u a v m × ( 1 ) m Γ q ( ν + m + 1 / 2 ) Γ q ( α ( 2 m + 1 ) + β )
and
N q t ν 1 J 1 , q ( α , β ) E ( 2 a t ) ( u ; v ) = u v ν + 1 2 ( 1 q ) ν 1 2 m = 0 2 m + 1 m q ( 1 q ) u a v m × ( 1 ) m Γ q ( ν + m + 1 / 2 ) Γ q ( α ( 2 m + 1 ) + β ) K u v ; ν + m + 1 / 2 ,
respectively.
Corollary 2.
In consideration of n = 1 , a 1 = a , m 1 = m and μ 1 = 1 in Theorem 5 and 6, the N q -transform and N q -transform for the qMLTF C 1 , q ( α , β ) E ( a t ) are given as:
N q t ν 1 C 1 , q ( α , β ) E ( a t ) ( u ; v ) = 1 v ( 1 q ) u v ν 1 m = 0 ( 1 q ) u a v m ( 1 ) m Γ q ( ν + m ) Γ q ( α m + β ) [ 1 + m ] q !
and
N q t ν 1 C 1 , q ( α , β ) E ( a t ) ( u ; v ) = u v ν ( 1 q ) ν 1 m = 0 ( 1 ) m ( 1 q ) u a v m Γ q ( ν + m ) [ m + 1 ] q ! Γ q ( α m + β ) K u v ; ν + m ,
respectively.

4. Miscellaneous Properties

Theorem 7.
The qMLBF J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) satisfies the following identity
J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) = ( 1 ) n J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) .
Proof. 
Replacing u by u in Equation (12), we obtain
J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) = c ^ u d ^ ( α , β ) q 2 n e q c ^ u d ^ ( α , β ) q 2 2 ϕ 0 , q ψ 0 , q ,
which, by conducting some simplifications and using Equation (12), yields assertion (48). □
Theorem 8.
For qMLBF J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) , the following q-recurrence formula holds true:
2 D ^ q , u J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) = d ^ ( α , β ) q J n 1 , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) J n + 1 , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) .
Proof. 
Using Equation (6) in relation (15), it follows that
n = J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) t n = e q u 2 d ^ ( α , β ) q t 1 t ψ 0 , q , t 0 ,
which, upon taking the q-derivative on both sides with respect to u, becomes
D ^ q , u n = J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) t n = d ^ ( α , β ) q 2 t 1 t e q u 2 d ^ ( α , β ) q t 1 t ψ 0 , q .
Using Equation (51) on the right-hand-side of Equation (52), and through equating the coefficient identical powers of t on both sides of the resultant equation, assertion (50) is proven. □
Theorem 9.
For qMLTF C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) , the following q-recursive formula holds:
C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) = c ^ m C n + m , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) .
Proof. 
Replacing n by n + m in Equation (14), we receive
C n + m , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) = c ^ n + m e q c ^ u d ^ ( α , β ) q ϕ 0 , q ψ 0 , q ,
which, through replacing c ^ by c ^ and by performing some simplifications, leads to assertion (53). □
Theorem 10.
For u d ^ ( α , β ) q = q u d ^ ( α , β ) q , the qMLTF C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) satisfy the following q-derivative formulas:
D ^ q , u C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) = d ^ ( α , β ) q C n + 1 , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) ,
D ^ q , u C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) = c ^ d ^ ( α , β ) q C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) .
Proof. 
In view of identity (6), Equation (16) can be written as
n = C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) t n = e q ( t ) e q u d ^ ( α , β ) q t ψ 0 , q .
Differentiating Equation (57) with respect to u gives
D ^ q , u n = C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) t n = d ^ ( α , β ) q t e q ( t ) e q u d ^ ( α , β ) q t ψ 0 , q ,
which, through using relation (57) on the right-hand-side, yields
D ^ q , u n = C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) t n = d ^ ( α , β ) q t n = C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) t n .
Adjusting the powers of t in Equation (59), assertion (55) is obtained.
  • Similarly, through taking the q-derivative of relation (14) and by performing some simplifications, assertion (56) is proven. □
The addition of relations (55) and (56) gives the following result:
Corollary 3.
For the qMLTF C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) , the following q-derivative formula holds:
D ^ q , u C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) = d ^ ( α , β ) q 2 C n + 1 , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) + c ^ C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) .

5. Graphical Representation

To explore the properties of J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) and C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) in q-MLBF and q-MLTF, understanding their shapes is crucial. Using software like “Wolfram Mathematica”, we analyze these functions across various index values. Recent advancements in computer software have empowered researchers to swiftly visualize and address numerous mathematical challenges, facilitating pattern recognition and data analysis. This capability significantly enhances mathematicians ability to comprehend fundamental concepts more effectively than ever before.
The graphs of qMLBF J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) are drawn by taking q = 0.75 , α = 1.15 , β = 0.25 , n = 10 and n = 11 , respectively, in relation (21) (see Figure 1 and Figure 2):
Again, by choosing q = 0.95 , α = 1 , β = 1 , n = 10 and n = 11 , respectively, in Equation (21), the shapes of qMLBF J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) are plotted in Figure 3 and Figure 4.
Now, the graphs of the qMLTF C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) are obtained by taking n = 10 , q = 0.09 , α = 3.4 , β = 1.5 (Figure 5) and n = 10 , q = 0.9 , α = 0.4 , β = 0.5 (Figure 6) in Equation (22).
The graphs show the behaviour of the qMLBF J n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) and qMLTF C n , q ( α , β ) E ( u ) . The investigation regarding the shapes of the hybrid q-special functions will be very helpful for researchers in regard to understanding the properties of these hybrid q-special functions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.A.K. and T.N.; methodology, W.A.K. and M.A.; software, T.N.; validation, W.A.K., M.A. and T.N.; formal analysis, M.A.; investigation, W.A.K.; resources, M.A.; data curation, T.N.; writing—original draft preparation, W.A.K.; writing—review and editing, W.A.K. and T.N.; visualization, M.A.; supervision, W.A.K.; project administration, M.A.; funding acquisition, M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Jouf University through the Fast-track Research Funding Program.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alatawi, M.S. (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia); Raza, N. (Mathematics Section, Women’s College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India); Kumar, M. (Department of Mathematics, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India); Khan, W.A. (Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia) Insights into q-Mittag-Leffler-Laguerre Polynomials: Properties and Operational Identities. 2024, submitted.
  2. Riyasat, M.; Nahid, T.; Khan, S. q-Tricomi functions and quantum algebra representations. Georgian Math. J. 2021, 28, 793–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kac, V.G.; Cheung, P. Quantum Calculus; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  4. De Sole, A.; Kac, V.G. On integral representations of q-gamma and q-beta functions. Rend. Math. Acc. Lincei 2005, 9, 11–29. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jackson, F.H. On q-definite integrals. Quart. J. Pure Appl. Math. 1910, 41, 193–203. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dattoli, G.; Torre, A. q-Bessel functions: The point of view of the generating function method. Rend. Mat. Appl. 1997, 17, 329–345. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dattoli, G.; Torre, A. Symmetric q-Bessel functions. Le Matematiche 1996, 51, 153–167. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mansour, Z.S.I. Linear sequential q-difference equations of fractional order. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2009, 12, 159–178. [Google Scholar]
  9. Albayrak, D.; Purohit, S.D.; Ucar, F. On q-Sumudu transforms of certain q-polynomials. Filomat 2013, 27, 413–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Albayrak, D.; Purohit, S.D.; Ucar, F. On q-analogues of Sumudu transform. Analele Stiintifice Ale Univ. Ovidius Constanta 2013, 21, 239–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Al-Omari, S.K.Q. On q-analogues of the Natural Transform of Certain q-Bessel Functions and Some Application. Filomat 2017, 31, 2587–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Purohit, S.D.; Kalla, S.L. On q-Laplace transforms of the q-Bessel functions. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2007, 10, 189–196. [Google Scholar]
  13. Horwood, E. Basic Hypergeometric Functions and Applications; Chichester: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Shape of J 10 , 0.75 ( 1.15 , 0.25 ) E ( u ) .
Figure 1. Shape of J 10 , 0.75 ( 1.15 , 0.25 ) E ( u ) .
Symmetry 16 01580 g001
Figure 2. Shape of J 11 , 0.75 ( 1.15 , 0.25 ) E ( u ) .
Figure 2. Shape of J 11 , 0.75 ( 1.15 , 0.25 ) E ( u ) .
Symmetry 16 01580 g002
Figure 3. Shape of J 10 , 0.95 ( 1 , 1 ) E ( u ) .
Figure 3. Shape of J 10 , 0.95 ( 1 , 1 ) E ( u ) .
Symmetry 16 01580 g003
Figure 4. Shape of J 11 , 0.95 ( 1 , 1 ) E ( u ) .
Figure 4. Shape of J 11 , 0.95 ( 1 , 1 ) E ( u ) .
Symmetry 16 01580 g004
Figure 5. Shape of C 10 , 0.09 ( 3.4 , 1.5 ) E ( u ) .
Figure 5. Shape of C 10 , 0.09 ( 3.4 , 1.5 ) E ( u ) .
Symmetry 16 01580 g005
Figure 6. Shape of C 10 , 0.9 ( 0.4 , 0.5 ) E ( u ) .
Figure 6. Shape of C 10 , 0.9 ( 0.4 , 0.5 ) E ( u ) .
Symmetry 16 01580 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khan, W.A.; Alhazmi, M.; Nahid, T. A Novel Family of q-Mittag-Leffler-Based Bessel and Tricomi Functions via Umbral Approach. Symmetry 2024, 16, 1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16121580

AMA Style

Khan WA, Alhazmi M, Nahid T. A Novel Family of q-Mittag-Leffler-Based Bessel and Tricomi Functions via Umbral Approach. Symmetry. 2024; 16(12):1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16121580

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khan, Waseem Ahmad, Mofareh Alhazmi, and Tabinda Nahid. 2024. "A Novel Family of q-Mittag-Leffler-Based Bessel and Tricomi Functions via Umbral Approach" Symmetry 16, no. 12: 1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16121580

APA Style

Khan, W. A., Alhazmi, M., & Nahid, T. (2024). A Novel Family of q-Mittag-Leffler-Based Bessel and Tricomi Functions via Umbral Approach. Symmetry, 16(12), 1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16121580

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop