Next Article in Journal
Review of Contributions to the Special Edition: New Applications of Symmetry in Lattice Field Theory
Next Article in Special Issue
Bi-Starlike Function of Complex Order Involving Mathieu-Type Series Associated with Telephone Numbers
Previous Article in Journal
Valency-Based Indices for Some Succinct Drugs by Using M-Polynomial
Previous Article in Special Issue
Some Properties of Certain Classes of Meromorphic Multivalent Functions Defined by Subordination
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Faber Polynomial Coefficient Estimates for Janowski Type bi-Close-to-Convex and bi-Quasi-Convex Functions

1
Department of Mathematics, Abbottabad University of Science and Technology, Abbottabad 22500, Pakistan
2
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Beykent University, Istanbul 34500, Turkey
3
Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Faroe Islands, Vestarabryggja 15, FO 100 Torshavn, Faroe Islands, Denmark
4
Mathematics Department, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 22452, Riyadh 11495, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Mathematics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus, Wah Cantt 47040, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2023, 15(3), 604; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15030604
Submission received: 29 January 2023 / Revised: 9 February 2023 / Accepted: 14 February 2023 / Published: 27 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry in Pure Mathematics and Real and Complex Analysis)

Abstract

:
Motivated by the recent work on symmetric analytic functions by using the concept of Faber polynomials, this article introduces and studies two new subclasses of bi-close-to-convex and quasi-close-to-convex functions associated with Janowski functions. By using the Faber polynomial expansion method, it determines the general coefficient bounds for the functions belonging to these classes. It also finds initial coefficients of bi-close-to-convex and bi-quasi-convex functions by using Janowski functions. Some known consequences of the main results are also highlighted.
MSC:
Primary: 05A30; 30C45; Secondary: 11B65; 47B38

1. Introduction and Preliminaries

Let A denote the set of all analytic functions f in the open unit disk E = { z : z < 1 } . The functions of A are normalized by
f 0 = 0 and f 0 = 1 .
Thus, every function f A can be expressed in the series form provided as:
f ( z ) = z + m = 2 a m z m .
Furthermore, S is the subclass of A whose members are univalent in E. For f 1 , f 2 A , the function f 1 is said to subordinate the function f 2 in E, denoted symbolically as f 1 ( z ) f 2 ( z ) , if there exists a function u 0 A with u 0 ( z ) < 1 , u 0 ( 0 ) = 0 , such that
f 1 ( z ) = f 2 ( u 0 ( z ) ) , z E .
Some well-known subclasses of univalent functions class S are provided as:
S * ( α ) = f S : R e z f ( z ) f ( z ) > α , 0 α < 1 .
K ( α ) = f S : R e z f ( z ) f ( z ) > α , 0 α < 1 .
C ( α ) = f S , g S * : R e z f ( z ) g ( z ) > α , 0 α < 1 .
C * ( α ) = f S , g K : R e z f ( z ) g ( z ) > α , 0 α < 1 .
These classes are starlike functions of order α , convex functions of order α , close-to-convex functions of order α , and qausi convex functions of order α , respectively, see [1,2,3,4,5].
For each function f S has an inverse function f 1 = F , defined as:
F ( f ( z ) ) = z , z E ,
and
f ( F ( w ) ) = w , w < r 0 ( f ) , r 0 ( f ) 1 4 .
The series of the inverse function is provided by
F ( w ) = w a 2 w 2 + ( 2 a 2 2 a 3 ) w 3 ( 5 a 2 3 5 a 2 a 3 + a 4 ) w 4 + .
An analytic function f is called bi-univalent in E if f and f 1 are both univalent in E, and the class of all bi-univalent functions is denoted by Σ . For f Σ , Levin [6] proved that a 2 < 1.51 and after that Branan and Clunie [7] improved this bound and proved that a 2 2 . Furthermore, for f Σ , Netanyahu [8] proved that max a 2 = 4 3 (see for details [9,10,11,12]). In these recent papers, only non-sharp estimates on the initial coefficients were obtained.
Faber [13] introduced the Faber polynomials expansion method and used this technique to investigate the coefficient bounds | a m | for m 3 . These polynomials play an important role in mathematical sciences, particularly in Geometric Function Theory. Hamidi and Jahangiri [14,15] defined new subclasses of bi-univalent functions by using the Faber polynomials expansion technique and found some interesting and useful properties. In 1948, Schiffer [16] studied applications of the Faber polynomials in the theory of univalent functions. After that, Pommerenke [17,18,19] provided the substantial contributions to the available information about the structure of the Faber polynomials. Further, in 1971, Curtiss [20] studied the Faber polynomial and the Faber series, while, in 2006, Airault [21] used the Faber polynomials in the coordinate system to study the geometry of the manifold of coefficients of univalent functions. Then, in 2007, Airault [22] found symmetric sums associated with the factorizations of the Grunsky coefficients. Hamidi et al. [23] started to apply the Faber polynomial methods for meromorphic bi-starlike functions and discussed the unpredictable behaviors of the initial coefficients. In [24,25], Altinkaya and Yalcin also applied the Faber polynomial methods and investigated general coefficient bounds and different behaviors of initial coefficient bounds. Bulut [26] considered a new class of meromorphic bi-univalent functions and used the Faber polynomial technique and produced some useful results. Recently, Jia et al. [27] studied symmetric analytic functions by using Faber polynomials. Several different subclasses of the analytic and bi-univalent functions were introduced and analogously studied by the many authors (see, for example, [21,24,25,28,29,30,31,32,33]).
Now, we provide the definitions of two new subclasses of bi-close-to-convex and bi-quasi-convex functions related with Janowski functions.
Definition 1. 
A function f A is said to be bi-close-to-convex in E if both f and f 1 = F are close-to-convex in E. Furthermore, f C Σ A , B , the class of bi-close-to-convex functions associated with Janowski functions, if there is a function g S * satisfying
z f ( z ) g ( z ) 1 + A z 1 + B z
and
w F ( w ) G ( w ) 1 + A w 1 + B w ,
where, 1 B < A 1 , z , w E .
Definition 2. 
Let f be an analytic function and be of the form (1). Then, f C Σ * A , B , the class of bi-Quasi-convex functions associated with Janowski functions, if there is a function g C satisfying
z f ( z ) g ( z ) 1 + A z 1 + B z
and
w F ( w ) G ( w ) 1 + A w 1 + B w ,
where 1 B < A 1 , z , w E .
Throughout, in this article, we assume 1 B < A 1 .

2. The Faber Polynomial Expansion Method and Its Applications

Using the Faber polynomial technique for the analytic function f , the coefficients of its inverse map F can be written as follows (see [21,22]):
F ( w ) = f 1 ( w ) = w + m = 2 1 m S m 1 m ( a 2 , a 3 , , a m ) w m ,
where
S m 1 m = ( m ) ! ( 2 m + 1 ) ! ( m 1 ) ! a 2 m 1 + ( m ) ! 2 ( m + 1 ) ! ( m 3 ) ! a 2 m 3 a 3 + ( m ) ! ( 2 m + 3 ) ! ( m 4 ) ! a 2 m 4 a 4 + ( m ) ! 2 ( m + 2 ) ! ( m 5 ) ! a 2 m 5 a 5 + ( m + 2 ) a 3 2 + ( m ) ! ( 2 m + 5 ) ! ( m 6 ) ! a 2 m 6 a 6 + ( 2 m + 5 ) a 3 a 4 + j 7 a 2 j m Q m ,
and Q m is a homogeneous polynomial in the variables a 2 , a 3 , , a m , for 7 j m . Particularly, the first three terms of S m 1 m are
1 2 S 1 2 = a 2 , 1 3 S 2 3 = 2 a 2 2 a 3 , 1 4 S 3 4 = ( 5 a 2 3 5 a 2 a 3 + a 4 ) .
In general, for r Z ( Z : = 0 , ± 1 , ± 2 , ) and m 2 , an expansion of S m r is of the form:
S m r = r a m + r ( r 1 ) 2 V m 2 + r ! ( r 3 ) ! 3 ! V m 3 + + r ! ( r m ) ! ( m ) ! V m m ,
where
V m r = V m r ( a 2 , a 3 , ) ,
and, by [22], we have
V m v ( a 2 , , a m ) = m = 1 v ! ( a 2 ) μ 1 ( a m ) μ m μ 1 ! , , μ m ! , for a 1 = 1 and v m .
The sum is adopted over all non-negative integers μ 1 , , μ m which satisfy
μ 1 + μ 2 + + μ m = v
and
μ 1 + 2 μ 2 + + m μ m = m .
For more details, see [34]. Clearly,
V m m ( a 1 , , a m ) = V 1 m ,
and the first and last polynomials are
V m m = a 1 m , and V m 1 = a m .
To prove our main results, we shall need the following well-known lemmas (see Jahangiri [35], Duren [1]).
Lemma 1. 
Let Φ ( z ) = 1 + m = 1 c m z m be a positive real part function so that
R e Φ ( z ) > 0
for z < 1 . If α 1 2 , then
c 2 + α c 1 2 2 + α c 1 2 .
Lemma 2. 
Let φ ( z ) = m = 1 φ m z m be a Schwarz function so that
φ ( z ) < 1
for z < 1 . If γ 0 , then
φ 2 + γ φ 1 2 1 + γ 1 φ 1 2 .
Now, by using the Faber Polynomial technique, we obtain general coefficients a m , for the classes C Σ A , B and C Σ * A , B . We also show the unpredictable behavior of the initial coefficients for these classes.

3. Main Results

Theorem 1. 
Let f C Σ A , B be an analytic function and if a k = 0 , 2 k m 1 , then
a m A B m + 1 , f o r m 3 .
Proof. 
For f C Σ A , B , there exists a function g S * , then the Faber polynomial expansion for z f ( z ) g ( z ) is provided by
z f ( z ) g ( z ) = 1 + m = 2 m a m b m l = 1 m 2 S l 1 ( b 2 , b 3 , b l + 1 ) m l a m l b m l z m 1 .
For the inverse mappings F = f 1 and G = g 1 , the Faber polynomial expansion for w F ( w ) G ( w ) is
w F ( w ) G ( w ) = 1 + m = 2 m A m B m l = 1 m 2 S l 1 ( B 2 , B 3 , B l + 1 ) m l A m l B m l w m 1 .
As opposed to that, since z f ( z ) g ( z ) 1 + A z 1 + B z in E, by the definition of subordination, there exist a Schwarz function
w ( z ) = m = 1 c m z m , z E
such that
z f ( z ) g ( z ) = 1 + A w ( z ) 1 + B w ( z ) = = 1 + m = 1 A B S m 1 c 1 , c 2 , c m , B z m .
Similarly, w F ( w ) G ( w ) 1 + A z 1 + B z in E, there exists a Schwarz function
ϕ ( w ) = m = 1 d m w m
such that
w F ( w ) G ( w ) = 1 + A ϕ ( w ) ) 1 + B ϕ ( w ) ) = 1 + m = 1 A B S m 1 d 1 , d 2 , d m , B w m .
In general (e.g., see [21,28]), the coefficients S m p k 1 , k 2 , k m , B are provided by
S m p k 1 , k 2 , k m , B = p ! p m ! m ! k 1 m B m 1 + p ! p m + 1 ! m 2 ! k 1 m 2 k 2 B m 2 + p ! p m + 2 ! m 3 ! k 1 m 3 k 3 B m 3 + p ! p m + 3 ! m 4 ! k 1 m 4 k 4 B m 4 + p m + 3 2 k 3 2 B + p ! p m + 4 ! m 5 ! k 1 m 5 k 5 B m 5 + p m + 4 k 3 k 4 B + j 6 k 1 m j X j ,
where X j is a homogeneous polynomial of degree j in the variables k 1 , k 2 , k m .
Evaluating the coefficients of Equations (3) and (5), for any m 2 , yields
m a m b m l = 1 m 2 S l 1 ( b 2 , b 3 , b l + 1 ) × m l a m l b m l = A B S m 1 1 c 1 , c 2 , c m 1 , B .
Evaluating the coefficients of Equations (4) and (6) for any m 2 , yields
m A m B m l = 1 m 2 S l 1 ( B 2 , B 3 , B l + 1 ) × m l A m l B m l = A B S m 1 1 d 1 , d 2 , d m 1 , B .
For special case m = 2 , from Equations (7) and (8), we obtain
2 a 2 b 2 = A B c 1 2 A 2 B 2 = A B d 1 .
Solving for a 2 and adopting the absolute values for the coefficients of the Schwarz functions p and q , e.g., | c m | 1 and | d m | 1 (e.g, see Duren [1]), we can obtain
a 2 A B 2 + 1 .
Furthermore, from the assumption 2 k m 1 , and a k = 0 , respectively, we obtain
A m = a m
and
m a m b m = A B c m 1 ,
m a m B m = A B d m 1 .
By solving Equations (9) and (10) for a m , determining the absolute values, and by the Caratheodory Lemma [1], we obtain
a m A B m + 1 ,
upon noticing that
b m m and B m m .
This completes Theorem 1. □
For A = 1 2 α and B = 1 , 0 α < 1 , in Theorem 1, we obtain a well-known corollary that was proved in [14].
Corollary 1. 
Let f C Σ α if a k + 1 = 0 , 1 k m . Then,
a m 1 + 2 1 α m , for m 3 .
Theorem 2. 
If an analytic function f provided by (1) belongs to the class C Σ A , B , then
a 2 B B A , B 0 < A , A B , A 0 ,
a 3 A B 2 1 + B A B , B 0 < A , B B A , A 0 ,
a 3 a 2 2 A B 2 .
Proof. 
For the function g = f in the proof of Theorem 1, we obtain a m = b m . For m = 2 , Equations (7) and (8), respectively, yield
a 2 = A B c 1
a 2 = A B d 1 .
From (11) and (12), we have
c 1 = d 1 .
If we adopt the absolute values of any of these two equations, for the coefficients of the Schwarz functions p and q, that is | c m | 1 and | d m | 1 (e.g., see Duren [1]), we obtain
a 2 A B .
For m = 3 , Equations (7) and (8), respectively, yield
a 2 2 2 a 3 = A B B c 1 2 c 2
and
2 a 3 3 a 2 2 = A B B d 1 2 d 2 .
Adding (14) and (15), we arrive at
2 a 2 2 = A B c 2 B c 1 2 + d 2 B d 1 2 = A B c 2 + B c 1 2 + d 2 + B d 1 2 .
For the coefficients of the Schwarz functions p and q, that is | c m | 1 and | d m | 1 (e.g., see Duren [1]), we have
2 a 2 2 A B c 2 + B c 1 2 + d 2 + B d 1 2 .
If B 0 < A , then using Lemma 2, we have
2 a 2 2 A B 1 + B 1 c 1 2 + 1 + B 1 d 1 2 .
For the coefficients of the Schwarz functions p and q , that is | c m | 1 and | d m | 1 (e.g., see Duren [1]), we obtain
a 2 B B A .
Consequently, we note that, if B 0 < A , then
B B A < B B A .
Multiplying Equation (14) by 3 and adding it to (15), we obtain
a 3 = A B 4 3 c 2 + B c 1 2 + d 2 + B d 1 2 ,
then, using Lemma 2, we have
a 3 A B 4 3 1 + B 1 c 1 2 + 1 + B 1 d 1 2 .
Since | c m | 1 and | d m | 1 (e.g., see Duren [1]), we obtain
a 3 B B A .
Substituting a 2 = A B c 1 in (14), we obtain
2 a 3 = A B c 2 B A B c 1 2 .
Using the triangle inequality, we have
2 a 3 A B c 2 + B A B c 1 2 .
Since | c m | 1 and | d m | 1 , we obtain
a 3 A B 2 1 + B A B .
Lastly, subtracting Equations (14) from (15), and using the fact (13)
a 3 a 2 2 = A B 4 c 2 d 2 .
Since | c m | 1 and | d m | 1 , we obtain
a 3 a 2 2 A B 2 .
For A = 1 2 α and B = 1 , 0 α < 1 , in Theorem 2, we obtain the following known result provided in [14].
Corollary 2. 
Let f C Σ α be provided by (1). Then,
a 2 2 1 α if 0 α < 1 2 , 2 1 α if 1 2 α < 1 , a 3 1 α if 0 α < 1 2 , 1 α 3 2 α if 1 2 α < 1 .
Theorem 3. 
Let f C Σ * A , B be provided by (1), if a k = 0 , 2 k m 1 . Then,
a m 1 m A B m + 1 , for m 3 .
Proof. 
For f C Σ * A , B , there exists a function g C , then the Faber polynomial expansion for z f ( z ) g ( z ) is
z f ( z ) g ( z ) = 1 + m = 2 m m a m b m l = 1 m 2 S l 1 ( b 2 , b 3 , b l + 1 ) m l m l a m l b m l z m 1 .
For the inverse mapping F = f 1 and G = g 1 , we obtain the Faber polynomial expansion for w F ( w ) G ( w ) , which is
w F ( w ) G ( w ) = 1 + m = 2 m m A m B m l = 1 m 2 S l 1 ( B 2 , B 3 , B l + 1 ) × m l m l A m l B m l w m 1 .
Opposite that, since z f ( z ) g ( z ) 1 + A z 1 + B z in E, by the definition of subordination, there exist a Schwarz function
w ( z ) = m = 1 c m z m , z E
such that
z f ( z ) g ( z ) = 1 + A w ( z ) ) 1 + B w ( z ) ) = = 1 + m = 1 A B S m 1 c 1 , c 2 , c m , B z m .
Similarly w F ( w ) G ( w ) 1 + A z 1 + B z in E, by the definition of subordination, there exist a Schwarz function
ϕ ( w ) = m = 1 d m w m
such that
w F ( w ) G ( w ) = 1 + A ϕ ( w ) ) 1 + B ϕ ( w ) ) = 1 + m = 1 A B S m 1 d 1 , d 2 , d m , B w m .
In general (e.g., see [21,28]), the coefficients S m p k 1 , k 2 , k m , B are provided as:
S m p k 1 , k 2 , k m , B = p ! p m ! m ! k 1 m B m 1 + p ! p m + 1 ! m 2 ! k 1 m 2 k 2 B m 2 + p ! p m + 2 ! m 3 ! k 1 m 3 k 3 B m 3 + p ! p m + 3 ! m 4 ! k 1 m 4 k 4 B m 4 + p m + 3 2 k 3 2 B + p ! p m + 4 ! m 5 ! k 1 m 5 k 5 B m 5 + p m + 4 k 3 k 4 B + j 6 k 1 m j X j ,
where, X j is a homogeneous polynomial of degree j in the variables k 1 , k 2 , k m .
Evaluating the coefficients of Equations (16) and (18), for any m 2 , yields
m m a m b m l = 1 m 2 S l 1 ( b 2 , b 3 , b l + 1 ) × m l m l a m l b m l = A B S m 1 1 c 1 , c 2 , c m 1 , B .
Evaluating the coefficients of Equations (17) and (19), for any m 2 , yields
m m A m B m l = 1 m 2 S l 1 ( B 2 , B 3 , B l + 1 ) × m l m l A m l B m l = A B S m 1 1 d 1 , d 2 , d m 1 , B .
For special case m = 2 , from Equations (20) and (21), we obtain
2 2 a 2 b 2 = A B c 1 , 2 2 A 2 B 2 = A B d 1 .
Solving for a 2 and adopting the absolute values for the coefficients of the Schwarz functions p and q , that is | c m | 1 and | d m | 1 (e.g., see Duren [1]), we can obtain
a 2 1 2 A B 2 + 1 .
Furthermore, from the assumption, 2 k m 1 , and a k = 0 , respectively, yields:
A m = a m ,
m m a m b m = A B c m 1 ,
and
m m a m B m = A B d m 1 .
By solving Equations (22) and (23) for a m and determining the absolute values and using the Caratheodory Lemma provided in [1], we obtain
a m 1 m A B m + 1 ,
upon noticing that
b m m and B m m .
This completes Theorem 3. □
Theorem 4. 
Let f C Σ * A , B be provided by (1). Then,
a 2 B B A 2 if B 0 < A , A B 2 if A 0 ,
a 3 B B A 2 if B 0 < A , A B 6 1 + A 2 B if A 0
and
a 3 a 2 2 A B 6 .
Proof. 
For the function g = f in the proof of Theorem 1, we obtain a m = b m . For m = 2 , Equations (20) and (21), respectively, yield
2 a 2 = A B c 1
2 a 2 = A B d 1 .
From (24) and (25), we have
c 1 = d 1 .
If we adopt the absolute values of any of these two equations, for the coefficients of the Schwarz functions p and q , that is | c m | 1 and | d m | 1 (e.g., see Duren [1]), we obtain
a 2 A B 2 .
For m = 3 , Equations (20) and (21), respectively, yield
4 a 2 2 6 a 3 = A B B c 1 2 c 2
and
6 a 3 8 a 2 2 = A B B d 1 2 d 2 .
Adding (27) and (28), we arrive at
4 a 2 2 = A B c 2 B c 1 2 + d 2 B d 1 2 = A B c 2 + B c 1 2 + d 2 + B d 1 2 .
Since | c m | 1 and | d m | 1 , we have
4 a 2 2 A B c 2 + B c 1 2 + d 2 + B d 1 2 .
If B 0 < A , then using Lemma 2, we have
4 a 2 2 A B 1 + B 1 c 1 2 + 1 + B 1 d 1 2 .
Since | c m | 1 and | d m | 1 , we obtain
a 2 B B A 2 .
Consequently, we note that, if B 0 < A ,
B B A 2 < B B A 2 .
Multiplying Equation (14) by 2 and adding it to (15), we obtain
6 a 3 = A B 2 c 2 + B c 1 2 + d 2 + B d 1 2 ,
then using Lemma 2, we have
a 3 A B 6 2 1 + B 1 c 1 2 + 1 + B 1 d 1 2 .
Since | c m | 1 and | d m | 1 , we obtain
a 3 B B A 2 .
Substituting a 2 = A B 2 c 1 in (27) and using the triangle inequality, we have
6 a 3 A B c 2 + A 2 B c 1 2 .
Since | c m | 1 and | d m | 1 , we obtain
a 3 A B 6 1 + A 2 B .
Lastly, subtract Equations (27) from (28) and use the fact (26)
a 3 a 2 2 = A B 12 c 2 d 2 .
Since | c m | 1 and | d m | 1 , we obtain
a 3 a 2 2 A B 6 .

4. Conclusions

The Faber polynomial expansion method is a useful tool that has been widely used to find the coefficient bounds of analytic functions. In this article, we have defined two new subclasses of bi-univalent functions associated with Janowski functions. We derived bounds on the initial as well as on the general coefficients for each of the defined classes. In addition, we have provided some intriguing corollaries as special cases of our obtained results. Furthermore, for future work, certain coefficient problems, such as Hankel determinants, Zalcman inequalities, Krushkal inequalities, etc., can be found for these classes of functions. For more about said coefficient problems, see [36,37,38,39,40].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K., Ş.A. and Q.X.; methodology, S.K., Ş.A. and Q.X.; software, S.N.M.; validation, S.N.M. and F.T.; formal analysis, N.K. and F.T.; investigation, S.K., Ş.A. and Q.X.; resources, S.N.M.; data curation, N.K. and F.T.; writing—original draft preparation, S.N.M. and N.K.; writing—review and editing, S.N.M. and N.K.; visualization, N.K. and F.T.; supervision, N.K.; project administration, N.K., F.T. and S.N.M.; funding acquisition, F.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No data is used in this work.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the researchers Supporting Project Number (RSP2023R401), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Duren, P.L. Univalent Functions. In Grundehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1983; Volume 259. [Google Scholar]
  2. Goodman, A.W. Univalent Functions; Mariner: Tampa, FL, USA, 1983; Volume I–II. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hayman, W.K. Multivalent Functions; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kaplan, W. Close-to-convex schlicht functions. Mich. Math. J. 1952, 1, 169–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Noor, K.I. On quasi-convex functions and related topics. Inter. J. Math. Math. Sci. 1987, 10, 241–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lewin, M. On a coefficient problem for bi-univalent functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1967, 18, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brannan, D.A.; Cluni, J. Aspects of Contemporary Complex Analysis; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  8. Netanyahu, E. The minimal distance of the image boundary from the origin and the second coefficient of a univalent function in |z| < 1. Arch. Ration. March. Anal. 1967, 32, 100–112. [Google Scholar]
  9. Brannan, D.A.; Taha, T.S. On some classes of bi-univalent function. Study. Univ. Babes Bolyai Math. 1986, 31, 70–77. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hayami, T.; Owa, S. Coefficient bounds for bi-univalent functions. Pan Am. Math. J. 2012, 22, 15–26. [Google Scholar]
  11. Khan, S.; Khan, N.; Hussain, S.; Ahmad, Q.Z.; Zaighum, M.A. Some classes of bi-univalent functions associated with Srivastava-Attiya operator. Bull. Math. Anal. Appl. 2017, 9, 37–44. [Google Scholar]
  12. Srivastava, H.M.; Bulut, S.; Caglar, M.; Yagmur, N. Coefficient estimates for a general subclass of analytic and bi-univalent functions. Filomat 2013, 27, 831–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Faber, G. Uber polynomische Entwickelungen. Math. Ann. 1903, 57, 1569–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Hamidi, S.G.; Jahangiri, J.M. Faber polynomials coefficient estimates for analytic bi-close-to-convex functions. Comptes Rendus Math. 2014, 352, 17–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hamidi, S.G.; Jahangiri, J.M. Faber polynomial coefficients of bi-subordinate functions. Comptes Rendus Math. 2015, 41, 1103–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schiffer, M. Faber polynomials in the theory of univalent functions. Bull. Am. Soc. 1948, 54, 503–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Pommerenke, C. Uber die Faberschen Polynome schlichter Funktionen. Math. Z. 1964, 85, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pommerenke, C. Konform Abbildung und Fekete-Punkte. Math. Z. 1965, 89, 422–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pommerenke, C. Uber die Verteilung der Fekete-Punkte. Math. Ann. 1967, 168, 111–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Curtiss, J.H. Faber polynomial and the faber series. Am. Mon. 1971, 78, 577–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Airault, H.; Bouali, H. Differential calculus on the Faber polynomials. Bull. Sci. Math. 2006, 130, 179–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Airault, H. Symmetric sums associated with the factorizations of Grunsky coefficients. In Proceedings of the Conference on Groups and Symmetries Honors John McKay, Montreal, QC, Canada, 27 April 2007. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hamidi, S.G.; Halim, S.A.; Jahangiri, J.M. Faber polynomial coefficient estimates for meromorphic bi-starlike functions. Int. J. Math. And Math. Sci. 2013, 2013, 498159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Altinkaya, S.; Yalcin, S. Faber polynomial coefficient bounds for a subclass of bi-univalent functions. Comptes Rendus Math. 2015, 353, 1075–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Altinkaya, S.; Yalcin, S. Faber polynomial coefficient bounds for a subclass of bi-univalent functions. Stud. Univ. Babes-Bolyai Math. 2016, 61, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bulut, S. Faber polynomial coefficient estimates for certain subclasses of meromorphic bi-univalent functions. Comptes Rendus Math. 2015, 353, 113–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jia, Z.; Khan, S.; Khan, N.; Khan, B.; Asif, M. Faber Polynomial Coefficient Bounds for m-Fold Symmetric Analytic and Bi-univalent Functions Involving q-Calculus. J. Funct. Spaces 2021, 2021, 5232247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Airault, H. Remarks on Faber polynomials. Int. Math. Forum. 2008, 3, 449–456. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bulut, S. Faber polynomial coefficients estimates for a comprehensive subclass of analytic bi-univalent functions. Comptes Rendus Math. 2014, 352, 479–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gong, S. The Bieberbach conjecture, translated from the Chinese original and revised by the author. In AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hussain, S.; Khan, S.; Zaighum, M.A.; Darus, M.; Shareef, Z. Coefficients bounds for certain subclass of bi-univalent functions associated with Ruscheweyh q-differential operator. J. Complex Anal. 2017, 2017, 2826514. [Google Scholar]
  32. Srivastava, H.M.; Khan, S.; Ahmad, Q.Z.; Khan, N.; Hussain, S. The Faber polynomial expansion method and its application to the general coe cient problem for some subclasses of bi-univalent functions associated with a certain q-integral operator. Stud. Univ. Babes-Bolyai Math. 2018, 63, 419–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Srivastava, H.M.; Motamednezhad, A.; Adegani, E.A. Faber polynomial coefficient estimates for bi-univalent functions defined by using differential subordination and a certain fractional derivative operator. Mathematics 2020, 8, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Leinartas, E.K. Multidimensional Hadamard composition and sums with linear constraints on the summation indices. Sib. Math. J. 1989, 30, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jahangiri, M. On the coefficients of powers of a class of Bazilevic functions. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 1986, 17, 1140–1144. [Google Scholar]
  36. Saliu, A.; Al-Shbeil, I.; Gong, J.; Malik, S.N.; Aloraini, N. Properties of q-Symmetric Starlike Functions of Janowski Type. Symmetry 2022, 14, 1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Riaz, A.; Raza, M.; Binyamin, M.A.; Saliu, A. The second and third Hankel determinants for starlike and convex functions associated with Three-Leaf function. Heliyon 2023, 9, e12748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Saliu, A.; Jabeen, K.; Al-Shbeil, I.; Aloraini, N.; Malik, S.N. On q-Limaçon Functions. Symmetry 2022, 14, 2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Taj, Y.; Zainab, S.; Xin, Q.; Tawfiq, F.M.O.; Raza, M.; Malik, S.N. Certain Coefficient Problems for q-Starlike Functions Associated with q-Analogue of Sine Function. Symmetry 2022, 14, 2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Raza, M.; Riaz, A.; Xin, Q.; Malik, S.N. Hankel Determinants and Coefficient Estimates for Starlike Functions Related to Symmetric Booth Lemniscate. Symmetry 2022, 14, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khan, S.; Altınkaya, Ş.; Xin, Q.; Tchier, F.; Malik, S.N.; Khan, N. Faber Polynomial Coefficient Estimates for Janowski Type bi-Close-to-Convex and bi-Quasi-Convex Functions. Symmetry 2023, 15, 604. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15030604

AMA Style

Khan S, Altınkaya Ş, Xin Q, Tchier F, Malik SN, Khan N. Faber Polynomial Coefficient Estimates for Janowski Type bi-Close-to-Convex and bi-Quasi-Convex Functions. Symmetry. 2023; 15(3):604. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15030604

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khan, Shahid, Şahsene Altınkaya, Qin Xin, Fairouz Tchier, Sarfraz Nawaz Malik, and Nazar Khan. 2023. "Faber Polynomial Coefficient Estimates for Janowski Type bi-Close-to-Convex and bi-Quasi-Convex Functions" Symmetry 15, no. 3: 604. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15030604

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop