Abstract
By making use of prestarlike functions, we introduce in this paper a certain family of normalized holomorphic functions defined in the open unit disk, and we establish coefficient estimates for the first four determinants of the symmetric Toeplitz matrices , , and for the functions belonging to this family. We also mention some known and new results that follow as special cases of our results.
MSC:
30C45; 30C20
1. Introduction
Let stand for the family of functions f of the form:
which are holomorphic in the open unit disk . Let S indicate the family of all functions in that are univalent in U.
Ruscheweyh [1] studied and investigated the family of prestarlike functions of order , which is the set of functions f such that is a starlike function of order , where
and ∗ stands the “Hadamard product”. The function can be written in the form:
where
We note that is a decreasing function in and satisfies
The so-called class of prestarlike functions was further extended and studied by various authors (see [2,3,4,5]).
In univalent function theory, extensive focus has been given to estimate the bounds of Hankel matrices. Hankel matrices and determinants play an important role in several branches of mathematics and have many applications [6]. Toeplitz determinants are closely related to Hankel determinants. Hankel matrices have constant entries along the reverse diagonal, whereas Toeplitz matrices have constant entries along the diagonal.
Recently, Thomas and Halim [7] introduced the symmetric Toeplitz determinant for , defined by
where , and . In particular,
and
Very recently, several authors established estimates of the Toeplitz determinant for functions belonging to various families of univalent functions (see, for example, [7,8,9,10,11,12,13]).
In recent years, studies estimating the coefficient bounds for the Toeplitz determinants for the class of univalent functions and its subclasses have been done by several researchers, such as Srivastava et al. (2019) [12], Ramachand and Kavita [11], Al-Khafaji et al. (2020) [14], Radnika et al. (2016, 2018) [9,10], Sivasupramanian et al. (2016) [15], Zhang et al. (2019) [16] and Ali et al. (2018) [17].
Recently, Aleman and Constantin [18] provided a nice connection between univalent function theory and fluid dynamics. They sought explicit solutions to the incompressible two-dimensional Euler equations by means of a univalent harmonic map. More precisely, the problem of finding all solutions describing the particle paths of the flow in Lagrangian variables was reduced to finding harmonic functions satisfying an explicit nonlinear differential system in with or (see also [19]).
We need the following results.
Lemma 1
([20]). If the function is given by the series , then the sharp estimate holds.
Lemma 2
([21]). If the function , then
for some with and .
In the next section, we define a new family of holomorphic and prestarlike functions. We denote this family by For this family, we generate Taylor–Maclaurin coefficient estimates for the coefficients and for the first four determinants of the Toeplitz matrices and for the functions belonging to this newly introduced family.
2. Main Results
We define the family as follows:
Definition 1.
We say that the family contains all the functions if the condition is satisfied:
Theorem 1.
Proof.
Let function . Then there exists such that
where
By equating the coefficients in (2), we have the relations
and
From the relations (3), (4) and (5), we obtain
and
and by applying Lemma 1, we get
and
□
Theorem 2.
Let be given by (1). Then
Proof.
By applying Lemma 2 to express in terms , it follows that
For convenience of notation, we choose , and since p is in the family simultaneously, we can suppose without loss of generality that . Thus, by applying the triangle inequality with , we deduce that
It is obvious that on , and thus . Trivially, when , we note that the expression has a maximum value on . Consequently
This concludes the proof. □
Remark 1.
Choosing and in Theorem 2 gives the result in Theorem 1, which was investigated by Thomas and Halim [7].
Theorem 3.
Let be given by (1). Then
where
Proof.
We select for ease of notation, and because the function p is in the family at the same time, we may assume that without losing generality. As a result, using the triangle inequality with and , we may conclude
Using elementary calculus to differentiate with respect to , we have
It is shown that for and fixed . As a result, is an increasing function of . So, . Therefore,
Now, on at , we have
□
Remark 2.
Choosing and in Theorem 3 gives the result in Theorem 2, which was investigated by Thomas and Halim [7].
Proof.
Applying triangle inequality and , we have
Using the same methods as Theorems 2 and 3, we have
On the closed area , we need to find the maximum value of . Assume that a maximum of exists at an interior point . After that, by differentiating with respect to , we have
If ,
If ,
If ,
which has the highest possible value
on . Further, if , we have
which has the highest possible value
on . So,
□
Remark 3.
Choosing and in Theorem 4 gives the result in Theorem 3, which was investigated by Thomas and Halim [7].
Theorem 5.
Let be given by (1). Then
Proof.
We select for ease of notation, and because the function p is in the family at the same time, we may assume that without losing generality. As a result, using the triangle inequality with , we have
Hence, at , we have
□
Remark 4.
Choosing and in Theorem 5 gives the result in Theorem 4, which was investigated by Thomas and Halim [7].
3. Conclusions
The objective of this paper was to create a new family of holomorphic and prestarlike functions. We generate Taylor–Maclaurin coefficient estimates for the first four determinants of the Toeplitz matrices , , and for the functions belonging to this newly introduced family.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.K.W. and L.-I.C.; methodology, A.K.W. and L.-I.C.; software, A.K.W. and L.-I.C.; validation, A.K.W. and L.-I.C.; formal analysis, A.K.W. and L.-I.C.; investigation, A.K.W. and L.-I.C.; resources, A.K.W. and L.-I.C.; data curation, A.K.W. and L.-I.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K.W. and L.-I.C.; writing—review and editing, A.K.W. and L.-I.C.; visualization, A.K.W. and L.-I.C.; supervision, A.K.W. and L.-I.C.; project administration, A.K.W. and L.-I.C.; funding acquisition, A.K.W. and L.-I.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the referees for their careful reading and helpful comments.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.
References
- Ruscheweyh, S. Linear operators between classes of prestarlike functions. Comment. Math. Helv. 1977, 52, 497–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shenan, G.M.; Salim, T.O.; Marouf, M.S. A certain class of multivalent prestarlike functions involving the Srivastava-Saigo-Owa fractional integral operator. Kyungpook Math. J. 2004, 44, 353–362. [Google Scholar]
- Marouf, M.S.; Salim, T.O. On a subclass of p-valent prestarlike functions with negative coefficients. Aligarh Bull. Math. 2002, 21, 13–20. [Google Scholar]
- Silverman, H.; Silvia, E.M. Prestarlike functions with negative coefficients. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 1979, 2, 427–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Breaz, D.; Karthikeyan, K.R.; Senguttuvan, A. Multivalent Prestarlike Functions with Respect to Symmetric Points. Symmetry 2022, 14, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, K.; Lim, L.-H. Every matrix is a product of Toeplitz matrices. Found. Comput. Math. 2016, 16, 577–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thomas, D.K.; Halim, S.A. Toeplitz matrices whose elements are the coefficients of starlike and close-to-convex functions. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 2017, 40, 1781–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayinla, R.; Bello, R. Toeplitz determinants for a subclass of analytic functions. J. Progress. Res. Math. 2021, 18, 99–106. [Google Scholar]
- Radhika, V.; Sivasubramanian, S.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Jahangiri, J.M. Toeplitz matrices whose elements are the coefficients of functions with bounded boundary rotation. J. Complex Anal. 2016, 2016, 4960704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Radhika, V.; Sivasubramanian, S.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Jahangiri, J.M. Toeplitz matrices whose elements are coefficients of Bazilevič functions. Open Math. 2018, 16, 1161–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramachandran, C.; Kavitha, D. Toeplitz determinant for some subclasses of analytic functions. Glob. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2017, 13, 785–793. [Google Scholar]
- Srivastava, H.M.; Ahmad, Q.Z.; Khan, N.; Khan, N.; Khan, B. Hankel and Toeplitz Determinants for a Subclass of q-Starlike Functions Associated with a General Conic Domain. Mathematics 2019, 7, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tang, H.; Khan, S.; Hussain, S.; Khan, N. Hankel and Toeplitz determinant for a subclass of multivalent q-starlike functions of order α. AIMS Math. 2021, 6, 5421–5439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Khafaji, S.N.; Al-Fayadh, A.; Hussain, A.H.; Abbas, S.A. Toeplitz determinant whose its entries are the coefficients for class of Non-Bazilevič functions. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1660, 012091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivasubramanian, S.; Govindaraj, M.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G. Toeplitz matrices whose elements are the coefficients of analytic functions belonging to certain conic domains. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2016, 109, 39–49. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H.Y.; Srivastava, R.; Tang, H. Third-order Henkel and Toeplitz determinants for starlike functions connected with the sine functions. Mathematics 2019, 7, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ali, M.D.F.; Thomas, D.K.; Vasudevarao, A. Toeplitz determinants whose elements are the coefficients of analytic and univalent functions. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 2018, 97, 253–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aleman, A.; Constantin, A. Harmonic maps and ideal fluid flows. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 2012, 204, 479–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Constantin, O.; Martin, M.J. A harmonic maps approach to fluid flows. Math. Ann. 2017, 316, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pommerenke, C. Univalent Functions; Vandenhoeck and Rupercht: Göttingen, Germany, 1975. [Google Scholar]
- Grenander, U.; Szegö, G. Toeplitz Forms and Their Applications; California Monographs in Mathematical Sciences; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1958. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).