Abstract
It is well known that the Hermite–Hadamard inequality (called the HH inequality) refines the definition of convexity of function defined on by using the integral of from a to b. There are many generalizations or refinements of HH inequality. Furthermore HH inequality has many applications to several fields of mathematics, including numerical analysis, functional analysis, and operator inequality. Recently, we gave several types of refined HH inequalities and obtained inequalities which were satisfied by weighted logarithmic means. In this article, we give an N-variable Hermite–Hadamard inequality and apply to some norm inequalities under certain conditions. As applications, we obtain several inequalities which are satisfied by means defined by symmetry. Finally, we obtain detailed integral values.
MSC:
Primary 26D15; secondary 26B25
1. Introduction
A function, , is said to be convex on if the inequality
holds for all . If the inequality (1) reverses, then f is said to be concave on . Let be a convex function on an interval . Then,
This double inequality is known in the literature as the Hermite–Hadamard integral inequality for convex functions. It has many applications in different areas of pure and applied mathematics. For some references about this latter point, we can consult [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Recently, we obtained the following two refined Hermite–Hadamard inequalities in order to obtain inequalities stronger than (2).
Theorem 1
([11]). Let be a convex function on . Then, for any
where
and
Theorem 2
([11]). Let be a convex function on . Then, for any and ,
where
and
In Section 2, we try to obtain an N-variable Hermite–Hadamard inequality. As applications we obtain several inequalities satisfied by arithmetic mean, geometric mean, logarithmic mean, harmonic mean, and so on. These means have the properties of symmetry. In Section 3, we obtain some norm inequalities. In Section 4, we obtain integral values of the Hermite–Hadamard inequality under some norm conditions.
2. -Variable Hermite–Hadamard Inequality
We need the following result.
Lemma 1.
Let or , where X is a linear space. Then,
Proof.
Then,
That is
□
We have the following N-variable Hermite–Hadamard inequality.
Theorem 3.
Let be a convex function on and let . Then, for any ,
Proof.
When , we have the following corollary.
Corollary 1.
Let and let . We suppose that for . Then,
That is
When , we have the following corollary.
Corollary 2.
Let . We suppose that for . Then,
When , we have the following corollary.
Corollary 3.
Let and let . We suppose that for . Then,
That is
When , we have the following corollary.
Corollary 4.
Let . Then,
3. Some Norm Inequalities
We put and in (2). Then, we have
Furthermore by (3), we have
Now, we suppose that is a convex and monotone increasing function on . We put , where and X is a Banach space with norm . Then, is convex on . Because for any and for any satisfying ,
Then, we have
Theorem 4.
Let is a convex and monotone increasing function on . Let X be a Banach space. We put , where . Then, for any and for any , we have
Proof.
By Lemma 1 and the convexity and monotonicity of ,
The inequalities, from the first to the third, are given by (3). Furthermore, the last inequality is given by Lemma 1. □
We take examples of .
Example 1.
(1) , where .
(2) .
(3) .
(4) .
4. Calculations of the Detailed Integral Values
We need the following two lemmas in order to prove some theorems.
Lemma 2.
Let be the Hilbert norm on a Hilbert space H. Then, for any we have
Proof.
□
Lemma 3.
Let be the Hilbert norm on a Hilbert space H. Then, for any we have
where and .
Proof.
Since
we may obtain the integral value of , where
and
Then,
Since
we obtain the result. □
Corollary 5.
Let be the Hilbert norm on a Hilbert space H and let . Then, for any we have
Proof.
It is clear from Lemma 2. □
Corollary 6.
Let be the Hilbert norm on a Hilbert space H and let . Then, for any we have
where and .
Proof.
It is clear from Lemma 3. □
Corollary 7.
Let be the Hilbert–Schmidt norm on all of the Hilbert–Schmidt class operators and let . Then for any positive Hilbert–Schmidt operators we have
Proof.
It is clear from Lemma 2. □
Corollary 8.
Let be the Hilbert–Schmidt norm on all of the Hilbert–Schmidt class operators and let . Then for any positive Hilbert–Schmidt operators we have
where and .
Proof.
It is clear from Lemma 3. □
5. Conclusions
Though the Hermite–Hadamard inequality had been given in 2-variable inequality for convex function, we obtained N-variable Hermite–Hadamard inequality in Theorem 3. Furthermore, we obtained one of norm inequalities as applications of Theorem 4 represented by an N-variable Hermite–Hadamard inequality. Lastly, we calculated several detailed integral values of norm inequalities.
Funding
The author is partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI 19K03525.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank the reviewers for their important suggestions and careful reading of the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
- Cerone, P.; Dragomir, S.S. Ostrowski type inequalities for functions whose derivatives satisfying certain convexity assumptions. Demonstr. Math. 2004, 37, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dragomir, S.S.; Agarwal, R.P. Two inequalities for differentiable mappings and applications to special means of real numbers and to trapezoidal formula. Appl. Math. Lett. 1998, 11, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dragomir, S.S.; Cerone, P.; Sofo, A. Some remarks on the midpoint rule in numerical integration. Studia Univ. Babes-Bolyai Math. 2000, 45, 63–74. [Google Scholar]
- Dragomir, S.S.; Cerone, P.; Sofo, A. Some remarks on the trapezid rule in numerical integration. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 2000, 31, 475–494. [Google Scholar]
- Furuichi, S.; Moradi, H.R. Advances in Mathematical Inequalities; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Mitroi-Symeonidis, F.C. About the precision in Jensen-Steffensen inequality. An. Univ. Craiova Ser. Mat. Inform. 2010, 37, 73–84. [Google Scholar]
- Moslehian, M.S. Matrix Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities. Houston J. Math. 2013, 39, 177–189. [Google Scholar]
- Pal, R.; Singh, M.; Moslehian, M.S.; Aujla, J.S. A new class of operator monotone functions via operator means. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2016, 64, 2463–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simic, S.; Bin-Mohsin, B. Some generalizations of the Hermite-Hadamard integral inequality. J. Inequal. Appl. 2021, 72, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Yanagi, K. Refined Hermite-Hadamard inequality and its application. Linear Nonlinear Anal. 2021, 7, 173–184. [Google Scholar]
- Yanagi, K. Refined Hermite-Hadamard inequality and weighted logarithmic mean. Linear Nonlinear Anal. 2020, 6, 167–177. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).