Next Article in Journal
Empirical Research on the Evaluation Model and Method of Sustainability of the Open Source Ecosystem
Previous Article in Journal
An Eigenvalue Inclusion Set for Matrices with a Constant Main Diagonal Entry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Study of Natural Radioactivity and Radiological Hazard Parameters of Various Imported Tiles Used for Decoration in Sudan

1
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, King Khalid University, P. O. Box 9004, Abha 61413, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
2
Sudan Atomic Energy Commission, P. O. Box 3001, Khartoum 11111, Sudan
3
Administration of Customs Laboratories and Environment, Radiation Protection and Nuclear Department, Sudan Customs Authority, Khartoum 11111, Sudan
4
Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Sfax (ISBS), Sfax University, P. O. Box 263, Sfax 3000, Tunisia
5
Faculty of Sciences and Arts in Balgarn, University of Bisha, P. O. Box 60, Balgarn-Sabt Al Olaya 61985, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
6
LR11-ES31 Laboratory of Biotechnology and Valorisation of Bio-Geo Resources, Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Sidi Thabet, BiotechPole of Sidi Thabet, University of Manouba, Biotechpole Sidi Thabet, 2020 Ariana, Tunisia
7
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, King Faisal University, P. O. Box 400, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
8
Physics Department, Taibah University, P. O. Box 344, AL Madinah Almunawarrah 41412, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2018, 10(12), 746; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10120746
Submission received: 11 November 2018 / Revised: 10 December 2018 / Accepted: 11 December 2018 / Published: 13 December 2018

Abstract

:
Various commercially imported ceramic materials used in the building of Sudanese dwellings were examined in order to determine their natural radioactivity and radiological hazard parameters. In this context, twenty-five different consignments were sampled and analyzed using (3″ × 3″) sodium iodide gamma spectrometry system NaI(Tl). The identified average activity concentrations of 238U, 232Th, and 40K were 183 ± 70, 51 ± 44, and 238 ± 77 Bq/kg dry-weights, respectively. A positive correlation between 238U and 232Th in the investigated samples was identified from the observed significant correlation (R2 = 0.8). Interestingly, a low Th/U ratio (~0.3) was recorded, which could be related to the systematic loss of thorium during the fabrication process. The measured activity concentrations for these radionuclides were comparable with the reported data obtained from similar materials used in other countries showing similarity in ceramic materials used in buildings. Five different radiation indices, such as the average radium equivalent (Raeq), the absorbed dose rate (D), the annual effective dose equivalent (AEDE), the external hazard index (Hex), and the radioactivity level index (lγ), which indicate hazardous radiation, were estimated from these measurements. The obtained results revealed average values of 274 ± 106 Bq/kg, 125 ± 48 nGy/h, 1.23 ± 0.48 mSv/y, 0.74 ± 0.29, and 0.94 ± 0.37, for Raeq, D, AEDE, Hex, and lγ, respectively. The mean values of Raeq and Hex were in good agreement with the international limits, while the means of D and lγ were higher than the universal values. Calculated AEDE in about 60% of the samples exceeded the universal limit of 1 mSv/y for the public exposure (maximum value of 2.16 mSv/y). The investigated parameters were in the same range for the majority of imported samples; however, they were slightly higher than the locally produced ceramic, highlighting the importance of monitoring imported materials for their radioactivity contents.

1. Introduction

Naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORMs) are present at a low concentration in the environment [1]. These natural radionuclides, including long-lived radioactive elements, such as uranium, thorium, potassium, and the decay product radium, can be classified according to their origin and formation. The earth’s crust is the source of these radionuclides and additionally, they could be part of all environmental compartments, even within the tissues of all living species [1]. NORMs occur in various natural materials (e.g., soils, water, gas, and non-metal minerals, including fertilizer raw materials, such as rock phosphate and apatite) [2,3]. Interestingly, it has been demonstrated that metal ores (tantalum, tin, niobium ores, gold, copper, etc.) are also associated with NORM [4]. Materials containing NORMs with an elevated radionuclides content which are used in industrial activities represent an environmental problem that needs to be addressed [5].
Generally, building materials are derived from rocks and soil which exhibit natural radioactivity related to the presence of uranium (238U) decay-series and thorium (232Th) decay-series, and the radioactive isotope of potassium (40K). The significant decay product in 238U series is radium (226Ra); for this reason, the series denoted the name radium decay. It has been demonstrated that people spend about 80% of their time indoors [6]. Human exposure to radiation is strongly related to the radioactivity content in building materials [7]. Therefore, the assessment of radioactivity in buildings is important to evaluate the radiation exposure. Among these decorative materials, ceramic tiles, which are manufactured using a mixture of earthly materials (shaped and heated at a high temperature), are used worldwide. The addition of zircon (ZrSiO4) to ceramic significantly enhances the natural radioactivity concentration compared to the average value of the earth’s crust. Moreover, the tiles processing enriches radionuclides in the final product [8].
The possibility of radioactive contamination or the presence of high concentrations of naturally occurring radioactive material may be high in these materials, which could affect human health and the environment [9,10]. This risk can be reduced by ensuring that the contaminated material is not exposed to the public, through the assessment of the quality of construction materials before they reach the market. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has developed a series of guidelines and technical documents related to the safety and dose limits permitted from naturally occurring radioactive materials [11]. The importing of naturally occurring radioactive materials is usually governed by various laws to ensure both quality and safety [12].
Sudan is a developing country, and in the last decades, it has been experiencing considerable development in infrastructure and constructions. This development is noticeable from the increasing number of buildings with a modern style, which requires the use of some imported building materials. Ceramic is used as a construction product to cover floors and walls, and as decoration material [5]. In Sudan, this is not limited to indoors, and outdoor yards and lounges also receive some interests of the use. For these purposes, Sudan imports ceramic from different countries, but mostly from China [13]. Ceramics are generally made from zirconium materials, which are made from natural ores that contain a trace amount of natural radioactive elements [14]. After the purification process, these traces are usually reduced to low levels.
The aim of this study is to explore the radiological hazards of ceramic used in buildings. The radioactivity level of imported ceramics used in Sudan as building materials will be evaluated and compared with global data. Finally, five selected hazard indices will be calculated to assess the exposure.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling and Sample Preparation

A total of 25 ceramics tiles, imported from China, were collected from different packages at the main seaport of Sudan, Port-Sudan City. The samples were obtained from different factories and include ceramic tiles used as a building material for walls and floors in Sudan.
About 0.7 kg in weight of each sample was crushed and samples were dried at 105 °C for 3 h to obtain a dry sample. Then, to ensure that the secular equilibrium was reached, samples were sealed in Marinelli beakers for about four weeks to allow the daughters’ decay rate to be same as that of the parent. The time of sealing is needed for confining radon gas within the available geometry to ensure the presence of all decay products.

2.2. Measurements

The radioactivity content and risk assessment were determined for the imported ceramic samples. Gamma spectrometry system model 802-4 NaI(Tl) crystal with a resolution range from 7.5 to 8.5% at a 662 kev peak of Cs-137 connected to a personal computer analyzer using Win TMCA32 software was employed for these measurements. The detector system comprises built-in electronic modules plugged to a PC via a USB link. For measurements, a Marinelli beaker containing the sample was placed in the detector for three to six hours (depending on the counting statistics). The spectrum was stored in the computer and evaluated using “Win TMCA32 target” Gmbh software (Genie 2000, Canberra, Meriden, CT, USA). The system was regularly calibrated using a standard mixed gamma source in the same geometry. Additionally, measurement with an empty beaker taken regularly for background deduction was carried out. Quality control was run with the assistance of three referenced materials (RGU-1, RGTH-1, and RGK-1) obtained from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). To consider the errors associated with the radioactivity measurements, validation parameters such as the minimum detectable activity (MDA) of the detector and uncertainty (including precision and accuracy) were assessed during analysis [15]. The MDA was determined at a 95% confidence level, while ten consecutive measurements were carried out to estimate the precision and accuracy associated with the activity concentrations of 232Th, 238U, and 40K, and the obtained data were satisfied.
The uranium (or radium) content of samples was evaluated via daughter isotopes that emit gamma rays and radium evaluated mainly from the gamma line of 609 keV of Bi-214 (assuming secular equilibrium between parent nuclides (238U and 226Ra) and daughters). Thorium content was estimated from 239 keV (gamma line) of Pb-212 and potassium content was evaluated from 1460 keV (gamma line). It should be noted that because of the poor resolution of NaI detectors, it was not possible to use low gamma energies of U-238 (63 keV) and Th-232 (92 keV) in this study.

2.3. Assessment of Radiological Hazard

To evaluate the radiological risk of exposure from the excess gamma radiation originating from ceramic used in building materials, some of radiological hazard indices have been calculated using Equations 1–5. The following section gives a brief description of these five indices.

2.3.1. Radium Equivalent Radioactivity (Raeq)

The radium equivalent activity (Raequ) is the sum of the activity of 238U, 232Th, and 40K based on the assumption that 10 Bq/Kg of 238U, 7 Bq/Kg of 232Th, and 130 Bq/Kg of 40K produced the same ᵞ-ray dose rates. The equivalent radioactivity is computed from the suggested Equation (1) [14,16].
Raequ (Bq/Kg) = CRa + 1.43 CTh + 0.077CK
where CRa, CTh, and Ck are the activity concentration of 238U (226Ra), 232Th, and 40K in Bq/Kg, respectively. To keep the external dose <1.5mGy/h [17], the highest value of Raeq must be <370 Bq/Kg.

2.3.2. The Absorbed Dose Rate

The absorbed dose rate (D) in air (in Bq/kg and at 1 m above the ground level) is associated with a specific activity concentration of 238U (226Ra), 232Th, and 40K, indicating the effects of gamma radiation [18,19]. The value of D is defined by Equation (2):
D (nGy/h) = 0.462 CRa + 0.604 CTh + 0.042 CK

2.3.3. The Annual Effective Dose Equivalent

The annual effective dose equivalent (AEDE) for the public or the worker in different samples (mSv/y) was estimated using Equation (3) [7].
AEDE (mSv/y) = (0.46CRa + 0.79CTh + 0.048CK) × 8.76 × 10−3

2.3.4. The External Hazard Index

The external hazard index (Hex) evaluates the radiation risk attributed to radioactive materials. The value of Hex is calculated using Equation (4) [7,19].
H ex = C Ra 370 + C Th 259 + C K 4810
To consider the radiation hazard insignificant, the Hex value must be less than or equal to unity [16].

2.3.5. The Radioactivity Level Index

The radioactivity level index ( I γ ) is used to estimate the rate of γ-radiation hazards linked with natural radionuclide in investigated samples. The I γ is defined by Equation (5) [20].
I γ = C Ra 300 + C Th 200 + C K 3000

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Radioactivity Contents in Ceramic Samples

Natural 238U, 232Th, and 40K were determined for the 25-ceramic samples using the gamma spectrometry system. The results of the measurements are presented in Table 1 and Figure 1 and Figure 2. The findings show that the activity concentrations varied from 93–318 Bq/kg, from 16–239, and from 126–384 Bq/kg for 238U, 232Th, and 40K, respectively. The average values ± standard deviations (SD) were found to be 183 ± 70 Bq/kg, 51 ± 44 Bq/kg, and 238 ± 77 Bq/kg for 238U, 232Th, and 40K, respectively. Table 1 shows descriptive statistics where the parameters are presented at <0.05.
The obtained activity concentrations of 238U, 232Th, and 40K were compared with the global average activity concentration values (50, 50, and 500 Bq/kg) [7]. The results revealed that all samples contain 238U (average 183 ± 70 Bq/kg) higher than the typical world value by at least two times, and up to five times in about 25% of the studied samples (average of 3.6 higher). This higher 238U is likely due to the source of the samples and processing composition. For 232Th, the majority of samples have values (average of 51 ± 44 Bq/kg) close to global values, with the exception of one sample. It is also observed that the average concentration of 40K (238 ± 77 Bq/kg) is lower than the corresponding typical world value. These results are relatively higher than the levels in previously investigated locally produced materials, particularly 238U [21,22]. However, the activity concentrations of 238U, 232Th, and 40K Bq/kg of ceramic samples in the present study are comparable, with slight variations with other studies in some countries [21,23,24,25,26,27], as indicated in Table 2.
Figure 1 shows a box-plot of 238U, 232Th, and 40K activity concentrations, where the minimum, maximum, and means are presented. Distributions of the obtained content of the three radionuclides are non-normal. The figure shows that an outlier is noted for 232Th. Excluding this outlier, the average 232Th concentration becomes 43 Bq/kg (i.e., about the same order of magnitude). Although 232Th is lower than 238U (ratio ~ 0.28), a significant correlation (R2 = 0.83) between the two radionuclides was observed, with one exceptional outlier, as can be noticed from Figure 2. The low Th/U ratio (compared to natural normal values) indicates that natural and/or man-made change occurred to the material, where a high loss of Th occurred either during a natural process or at a fabrication phase of the ceramic.

3.2. Assessment of Radiological Hazard

The calculated results are presented in Table 3. In addition, the obtained data of the five radiation indices were compared with the recommended global data [7,17], as described in the following sub-sections.
The activity concentrations’ range of 238U and 40K indicates that the maximum value of each radionuclide is approximately three to four times the minimum, while for 232Th, the activity concentration is widely scattered (Table 3).

3.2.1. Radium Equivalent Radioactivity (Raeq)

The calculations of Raeq reveal that the values ranged from 133 to 473 Bq/kg, with an average value of 274 ± 106 Bq/kg (Table 3). It is obvious that 80% of the samples have Raeq values less than the maximum allowed value of 370 Bq/kg, reducing the radiological hazard in ceramic tiles used in buildings [7,17].

3.2.2. The Absorbed Dose Rate

The absorbed dose rate values ranged between 62–216 nGy/h, with an average value of 125 ± 48 nGy/h (Table 3). From Table 3, it is noticed that about 32% of obtained results were below or equal to the permissible average global value of 80 nGy/h [19].

3.2.3. The Annual Effective Dose Equivalent

The annual effective dose equivalent (AEDE) ranged between 0.60 mSv/y and 2.17 mSv/y, with a mean value of 1.23 ± 0.48 mSv/y (Table 3). The results of AEDE indicated that 60% of the estimated values are higher than the international recommended value (1 mSv/y) for the public exposure dose criterion [18].

3.2.4. The External Hazard Index

The range of computed Hex for ceramic samples was between 0.36 and 1.28, with a mean value of 0.74 ± 0.29 (Table 3). Interestingly, about 90% of the values are lower than unity, fitting well with the universal assigned value, showing that these materials are safe for building construction [7,25].

3.2.5. The Radioactivity Level Index

I γ values were between 0.47–1.64, with a mean value of 0.94 ± 0.37 (Table 3). It is noticed that I γ values were higher than unity ( I γ > 1) in about 75% of the measured samples.

4. Conclusions

The radioactivity of the collected samples, from 25 consignments of ceramics imported to Sudan, was measured using γ-spectroscopy for radiation protection purposes as the material is used in a variety of dwellings and public buildings. Uranium content (238U) was 3.6 times higher than the recommended international limits. However, thorium (232Th) and potassium (40K) were within the levels. The high U/Th ratio (3.6) is attributed to the loss of thorium during fabrication of the ceramic. Investigations of hazard indices resulted as follows: Average radium equivalent activity (274 Bq/kg) lies within the recommended limit (370 Bq/kg). The absorbed dose rate average is 122 nGy/h, which is more than twice the international average value of 55 nGy/h. Annual effective dose equivalent showed higher values than the global recommended value of 1mSv/y in fourteen samples. External hazard index, Hex, is in good agreement with the specified limit (unity). Iγ values for all samples were higher than unity (>1). Therefore, from the measures and calculated radiological properties, the samples showed clear variation. Finally, it could be concluded that the ceramic used in the decoration of building materials could be a source of radiation that contributes to the total annual dose rate of γ-radiation (by 23%) for Sudanese dwellings and public buildings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M.S., M.A.S.; methodology, M.A.S.; software, I.S. and M.A.S.; validation, S.M.S. and I.S.; formal analysis, M.A.S. and F.B.R.; investigation, A.Y.A. and W.M.; resources, W.M.; data curation, F.B.R., S.M.S. and I.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.S.; writing—review and editing, W.M., I.S., F.B.R.; visualization, A.Y.A.; supervision, S.M.S.; project administration, W.M. and S.M.S.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia for providing administrative and technical support. The authors would also like to thank the Administration of Customs Laboratories and Environment, Radiation Protection and Nuclear Department, Sudan Customs Authority for facilitating the samples collection. We also appreciate the cooperation of Radiation Physics Institute at Atomic Energy Commission for providing the referenced materials. Likewise the authors thanks University of Bisha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. IAEA Safety Glossary. Terminology Used in Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection; IAEA: Vienna, Austria, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cañete, S.J.; Palad, L.J.; Enriquez, E.B.; Garcia, T.Y.; Yulo-Nazarea, T. Leachable 226Ra in Philippine phosphogypsum and its implication in groundwater contamination in Isabel, Leyte, Philippines. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2008, 142, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hegedűs, M.; Tóth-Bodrogi, E.; Németh, S.; Somlai, J.; Kovács, T. Radiological investigation of phosphate fertilizers: Leaching studies. J. Environ. Radioact. 2017, 173, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Harlow, K. Naturally occurring radioactive materials and the regulatory challenges to the zircon industry. J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 2017, 117, 409–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. USEPA. Evaluation of EPA’s Guidelines for Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (TENORM); Technical Report to Congress EPA 402-R-00-01; USEPA: Washington, DC, USA, June 2000.
  6. Turhan, S.; Arikan, I.H.; Demirel, H.; Gungor, N. Radiometric analysis of raw materials and end products in the Turkish ceramics industry. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2011, 80, 620–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. UNSCEAR. Sources, Effects, and Risks of Ionizing Radiation; Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes; United Nation: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  8. Konstantin, K. Radiological constraints of using building materials and industrial by-products in construction. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 246–253. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ballesteros, L.M.; Zarza, I.; Ortiz, J.; Serradell, V. Occupational exposure to natural radioactivity in a zircon sand milling plant. J. Environ. Radioact. 2008, 99, 1525–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Michael, P.; Leo, M.L.N. Radionuclide Concentration in Food and Environment; Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hossen, A.; Ferdous, N. Determination of Radiological Hazards and the Transfer Factors of Radionulides from Soil to Vegetables in the Southwestern District of Bangladesh. J. Phys. Sci. 2015, 2, 83–98. [Google Scholar]
  12. ICRP. Protection Against Radon-222 at Home and at Work. ICRP Publication 65. Ann. ICRP 1993, 23, 1–45. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chris, A.; Abiodun, A.; Zhang, C.; Laura, B. Lesson Learning in the Case of China-Sudan and South Sudan Relations; China and Africa, Palgrave Macmillan: Beijing, China, 2018; pp. 179–208. [Google Scholar]
  14. Beretka, J.; Mathew, P.J. Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials, Industrial Wastes and By-products. Health Phys. 1985, 48, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Currie, L.A. Limits for qualitative detection and quantitative determination, application to radioacitivity. Anal. Chem. 1968, 40, 586–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Krieger, R. Radioactivity of construction materials. Betonwerk Fertigteil Tech. 1981, 47, 468–475. [Google Scholar]
  17. UNSCEAR. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiations; Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 1998; pp. 42–85. [Google Scholar]
  18. Joel, E.S.; Maxwell, O.; Adewoyin, O.O.; Ehi-Eromosele, C.O.; Saeed, M.A. Assessment of natural radionuclides and its radiological hazards from tiles made in Nigeria. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2018, 144, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. NEA-OECD. Exposure to Radiation from Natural Radioactivity in Building Materials; Report by NEA Group of Experts; OECD: Paris, France, May 1979. [Google Scholar]
  20. UNSCEAR. Summary of Low Dose Radiation Effects on Health; Report of the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  21. Eisa, S. Investigation of Natural Radioactivity in Building Materials commonly used in Sudan. Master’s Thesis, Sudan Academy of Science, Khartoum, Sudan, December 2010. [Google Scholar]
  22. Isam, S.; Sara, A.; Sahar, E.; Hajo, I. Radiation exposure of workers in storage areas for building aterials. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 2014, 8, 394–400. [Google Scholar]
  23. Brígido, F.O.; Montalván, E.A.; Rosa, S.R.; Tomás, Z.J.; Hernández, P.A. Natural Radionuclide content in some building materials and gamma dose rate in dwellings in Cuba. J. Environ. Radioact. 2008, 99, 1834–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kpeglo, D.O.; Lawluvi, H.; Faanu, A.; Awudu, A.R.; Deatanyah, P.; Wotorchi, S.G. Natural Radioactivity and its Associated Radiological Hazards in Ghanaian Cement. Res. J. Environ. Earth Sci. 2011, 3, 161–166. [Google Scholar]
  25. Jankovic, M.M.; Rajacic, M.M.; Rakic, T.M.; Todorovic, D.J. Natural radioactivity in imported ceramic tiles used in Serbia. Process. Appl. Ceram. 2013, 7, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Amin, S.A.; Naji, M. Natural radioactivity in different commercial ceramic samples used in Yemeni buildings. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2013, 86, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Maxwell, O.; Adewoyin, O.O.; Joel, E.S.; Ehi-Eromosele, C.O.; Akinwumi, S.A.; Usikalu, M.R.; Emenike, C.P.; Embong, Z. Assessment of natural radioactivity in various commercial tiles used for building purposes in Nigeria. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2018, 11, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mean and range of the three nuclides: 238U, 232Th, and 40K (in Bq/kg).
Figure 1. Mean and range of the three nuclides: 238U, 232Th, and 40K (in Bq/kg).
Symmetry 10 00746 g001
Figure 2. Correlation between 238U and 232Th.
Figure 2. Correlation between 238U and 232Th.
Symmetry 10 00746 g002
Table 1. Activity concentrations of 238U, 232Th, and 40K (in Bq/Kg) of various imported commercial tile samples used for decoration in Sudan.
Table 1. Activity concentrations of 238U, 232Th, and 40K (in Bq/Kg) of various imported commercial tile samples used for decoration in Sudan.
Tiles Samples238U232Th40K
1104 ± 7.7239 ± 5.6301 ± 16
293 ± 5.416 ± 4.1215 ± 13
3311 ± 2.693 ± 6.7384 ± 16
497 ± 5.624 ± 4.0231 ± 13
5140 ± 5.738 ± 4.3335 ± 14
6195 ± 7.251 ± 5.2224 ± 11
7165 ± 6.635 ± 5.3297 ± 14
8214 ± 7.854 ± 5.8201 ± 12
9195 ± 7.854 ± 5.9174 ± 11
10318 ± 9.884 ± 7.3332 ± 16
11258 ± 9.170 ± 6.5289 ± 15
12117 ± 5.732 ± 4.3325 ± 15
13134 ± 6.029 ± 4.6130 ± 9.0
14135 ± 6.025 ± 4.5135 ± 9.0
15177 ±7.130 ± 5.1281 ± 14
16249 ± 7.954 ± 6.5224 ± 13
17245 ± 7.639 ± 6.2170 ± 10
18251 ± 7.741 ± 6.4162 ± 10
19131 ± 6.126 ± 4.7139 ± 10
20276 ± 8.668 ± 6.1345 ± 14
21127 ± 6.123 ± 4.8126 ± 9.0
22142 ± 6.634 ± 4.8192 ± 11
23100 ± 5.620 ± 4.4175 ± 12
24250 ± 8.868 ± 6.2311 ± 15
25147 ± 6.831 ± 5.2245 ± 14
Average18351238
Standard Error14915
Median16538224
Standard Deviation704477
Confidence Level (95%)291832
Table 2. Comparative analysis of activity concentrations of 238U, 232Th, and 40K (in Bq/Kg) in Bq/kg of commercial tiles used in various countries.
Table 2. Comparative analysis of activity concentrations of 238U, 232Th, and 40K (in Bq/Kg) in Bq/kg of commercial tiles used in various countries.
OriginActivity Concentration (in Bq/Kg)References
238U232Th40K
RangeAverageRangeAverageRangeAverage
Sudan3–39452.42.8–108.220.682–1413206.9[21]
Cuband 1nd1.2–22-9–857-[23]
Ghaniandnd18.13–38.1825.4467.50–655.13233[24]
Serbiandnd50–10165.5560–1070841.25[25]
Yemen0–560207.20–26775.2ndNd[26]
Nigeria37.5–24161.141.5–126.570.2270–940514.7[27]
Present Study93–31818316–23951126–384238-
1 not determined.
Table 3. Radiation indices of various imported commercial tile samples used for decoration in Sudan.
Table 3. Radiation indices of various imported commercial tile samples used for decoration in Sudan.
Tiles SamplesRaequ 1 (Bq/Kg)D 2 (nGy/h)AEDE 3 (mSv/yr)Hex 4lγ 5
14692052.171.271.64
2133620.600.360.47
34742162.121.281.63
4149690.670.400.52
52211021.000.590.77
62861311.270.770.98
72391101.070.640.83
83071401.370.831.05
92861301.270.770.98
104632112.061.251.59
113801741.691.021.31
12187870.850.510.66
13186850.820.500.64
14181830.800.490.62
152411111.080.650.83
163441571.530.931.18
173141441.390.851.07
183221471.420.871.09
19178820.790.480.61
204001831.781.081.38
21170780.750.460.58
22206940.920.550.71
23142660.640.380.49
243711701.661.001.28
25210970.940.570.73
Range133–47362–2160.60–2.170.36–1.280.46–1.64
Average ± Std274 ± 106125 ± 481.23 ± 0.480.74 ± 0.290.94 ± 0.37
1 Radium equivalent, 2 Absorbed Dose Rate, 3 Annual Effective Dose Equivalent, 4 External Hazard Index, 5 Radioactivity level index.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Siddeeg, S.M.; Suliman, M.A.; Ben Rebah, F.; Mnif, W.; Ahmed, A.Y.; Salih, I. Comparative Study of Natural Radioactivity and Radiological Hazard Parameters of Various Imported Tiles Used for Decoration in Sudan. Symmetry 2018, 10, 746. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10120746

AMA Style

Siddeeg SM, Suliman MA, Ben Rebah F, Mnif W, Ahmed AY, Salih I. Comparative Study of Natural Radioactivity and Radiological Hazard Parameters of Various Imported Tiles Used for Decoration in Sudan. Symmetry. 2018; 10(12):746. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10120746

Chicago/Turabian Style

Siddeeg, Saifeldin M., Mohamed A. Suliman, Faouzi Ben Rebah, Wissem Mnif, Amel Y. Ahmed, and Isam Salih. 2018. "Comparative Study of Natural Radioactivity and Radiological Hazard Parameters of Various Imported Tiles Used for Decoration in Sudan" Symmetry 10, no. 12: 746. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10120746

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop