A Review of Changes in Mountain Land Use and Ecosystem Services: From Theory to Practice
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (i)
- What quantitative methods have been developed for linking land use change in mountain regions with ecosystem services?
- (ii)
- To what extent is linking land use change in mountain regions with ecosystem services useful to stakeholders?
2. Methods
3. Approaches to Studying Land Use Changes in Mountain Ecosystems
4. From Theory to Practice
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Grêt–Regamey, A.; Brunner, S.H.; Kienast, F. Mountain Ecosystem Services: Who Cares? Mt. Res. Dev. 2012, 32, S23–S34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brunner, S.H.; Grêt-Regamey, A. Policy strategies to foster the resilience of mountain social-ecological systems under uncertain global change. Environ. Sci. Policy 2016, 66, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albert, C.H.; Thuiller, W.; Lavorel, S.; Davies, I.D.; Garbolino, E. Land-use change and subalpine tree dynamics: Colonization ofLarix deciduain French subalpine grasslands. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bugmann, H.; Gurung, A.B.; Ewert, F.; Haeberli, W.; Guisan, A.; Fagre, D.B.; Kääb, A.; Participants, G. Modeling the Biophysical Impacts of Global Change in Mountain Biosphere Reserves. Mt. Res. Dev. 2007, 27, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bernués, A.; Ruiz, R.; Olaizola, A.; Villalba, D.; Casasús, I.; Tolosana, A.O. Sustainability of pasture-based livestock farming systems in the European Mediterranean context: Synergies and trade-offs. Livest. Sci. 2011, 139, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verburg, P.H.; Van De Steeg, J.; Veldkamp, A.; Willemen, L.; Veldkamp, A. From land cover change to land function dynamics: A major challenge to improve land characterization. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 1327–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walz, A.; Lardelli, C.; Behrendt, H.; Grêt-Regamey, A.; Lundström, C.; Kytzia, S.; Bebi, P. Participatory scenario analysis for integrated regional modelling. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007, 81, 114–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhakal, B.; Khadka, M.; Gautam, M. Impacts of payment for ecosystem services of mountain agricultural landscapes on farming women in Nepal. GeoJournal 2020, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguilar–Gómez, C.R.; Maass, S.F.; Reyes, T.T.A. Differentiated payments for environmental services schemes: Amethodology proposal. J. Mt. Sci. 2018, 15, 1693–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrison, P.A.; Vandewalle, M.; Sykes, M.T.; Berry, P.M.; Bugter, R.; de Bello, F.; Feld, C.K.; Grandin, U.; Harrington, R.; Haslett, J.R.; et al. Identifying and prioritising services in European terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19, 2791–2821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Palomo, I. Climate Change Impacts on Ecosystem Services in High Mountain Areas: A Literature Review. Mt. Res. Dev. 2017, 37, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bebi, P.; Kulakowski, D.; Rixen, C. Snow avalanche disturbances in forest ecosystems—State of research and implications for management. For. Ecol. Manag. 2009, 257, 1883–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mori, A.S.; Spies, T.A.; Sudmeier-Rieux, K.; Andrade, A. Reframing ecosystem management in the era of climate change: Issues and knowledge from forests. Boil. Conserv. 2013, 165, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, M.; Bullock, J.M.; Hooftman, D.A.P. Mapping ecosystem service and biodiversity changes over 70 years in a rural English county. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013, 50, 841–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schroth, G.; Laderach, P.; Dempewolf, J.; Philpott, S.M.; Haggar, J.; Eakin, H.; Castillejos, T.; Moreno, J.G.; Soto-Pinto, L.; Hernández, R.; et al. Towards a climate change adaptation strategy for coffee communities and ecosystems in the Sierra Madre de Chiapas, Mexico. Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Glob. Chang. 2009, 14, 605–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Philpott, S.M.; Lin, B.; Jha, S.; Brines, S.J. A multi-scale assessment of hurricane impacts on agricultural landscapes based on land use and topographic features. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 128, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huber, R.; Bugmann, H.; Buttler, A.; Rigling, A. Sustainable Land-use Practices in European Mountain Regions under Global Change: An Integrated Research Approach. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Blattert, C.; Lemm, R.; Thees, O.; Lexer, M.J.; Hanewinkel, M. Management of ecosystem services in mountain forests: Review of indicators and value functions for model based multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecol. Indic. 2017, 79, 391–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lundström, C.; Kytzia, S.; Walz, A.; Grêt-Regamey, A.; Bebi, P. Linking Models of Land Use, Resources, and Economy to Simulate the Development of Mountain Regions (ALPSCAPE). Environ. Manag. 2007, 40, 379–393. [Google Scholar]
- Swetnam, R.; Fisher, B.; Mbilinyi, B.; Munishi, P.; Willcock, S.; Ricketts, T.; Mwakalila, S.; Balmford, A.; Burgess, N.; Marshall, A.; et al. Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: A GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92, 563–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Payne, D.; Spehn, E.M.; Snethlage, M.; Fischer, M. Opportunities for research on mountain biodiversity under global change. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2017, 29, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lavorel, S.; Grigulis, K. How fundamental plant functional trait relationships scale-up to trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services. J. Ecol. 2011, 100, 128–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopa, D.; Mwanyoka, I.; Jambiya, G.; Massoud, T.; Harrison, P.; Ellis-Jones, M.; Blomley, T.; Leimona, B.; Van Noordwijk, M.; Burgess, N.D. Towards operational payments for water ecosystem services in Tanzania: A case study from the Uluguru Mountains. Oryx 2012, 46, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Padilla, F.; Vidal, B.; Sánchez, J.; Pugnaire, F.I. Land-use changes and carbon sequestration through the twentieth century in a Mediterranean mountain ecosystem: Implications for land management. J. Environ. Manag. 2010, 91, 2688–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gratzer, G.; Keeton, W.S. Mountain Forests and Sustainable Development: The Potential for Achieving the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda. Mt. Res. Dev. 2017, 37, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schirpke, U.; Tappeiner, U.; Tasser, E. A transnational perspective of global and regional ecosystem service flows from and to mountain regions. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Grêt–Regamey, A.; Brunner, S.H.; Altwegg, J.; Christen, M.; Bebi, P. Integrating Expert Knowledge into Mapping Ecosystem Services Trade-offs for Sustainable Forest Management. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hirschi, C.; Briner, S.; Widmer, A.; Huber, R. Combining Policy Network and Model-Based Scenario Analyzes: An Assessment of Future Ecosystem Goods and Services in Swiss Mountain Regions. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rewitzer, S.; Huber, R.; Grêt-Regamey, A.; Barkmann, J. Economic valuation of cultural ecosystem service changes to a landscape in the Swiss Alps. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 26, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pǎtru–Stupariu, I.; Tudor, C.A.; Stupariu, M.S.; Buttler, A.; Peringer, A. Landscape persistence and stakeholder perspectives: The case of Romania’s Carpathian. Appl. Geogr. 2016, 69, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brändle, J.M.; Langendijk, G.; Peter, S.; Brunner, S.H.; Huber, R. Sensitivity Analysis of a Land-Use Change Model with and without Agents to Assess Land Abandonment and Long-Term Re-Forestation in a Swiss Mountain Region. Land 2015, 4, 475–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moreno, J.; Palomo, I.; Escalera, J.; Martín-López, B.; Montes, C. Incorporating ecosystem services into ecosystem-based management to deal with complexity: A participative mental model approach. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 29, 1407–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lambin, E.F.; Turner, B.L.; Geist, H.J.; Agbola, S.B.; Angelsen, A.; Bruce, J.W.; Coomes, O.T.; Dirzo, R.; Fischer, G.; Folke, C.; et al. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2001, 11, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ai, J.; Zhang, C.; Chen, L.; Li, D. Mapping Annual Land Use and Land Cover Changes in the Yangtze Estuary Region Using an Object-Based Classification Framework and Landsat Time Series Data. Sustainability 2020, 12, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bürgi, M.; Silbernagel, J.; Wu, J.; Kienast, F. Linking ecosystem services with landscape history. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 30, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Costanza, R.; D’Arge, R.; De Groot, R.; Farber, S.; Grasso, M.; Hannon, B.; Limburg, K.; Naeem, S.; O’Neill, R.V.; Paruelo, J.; et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Groot, R.S.; A Wilson, M.; Boumans, R.M. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41, 393–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- MEA. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- TEEB. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB; The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) Publisher: Nagoya, Japan, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, S.; Li, S. Ecosystem service relationships: Formation and recommended approaches from a systematic review. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 99, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nath, B.; Wang, Z.; Ge, Y.; Islam, K.; Singh, R.P.; Niu, Z. Land Use and Land Cover Change Modeling and Future Potential Landscape Risk Assessment Using Markov-CA Model and Analytical Hierarchy Process. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Briner, S.; Huber, R.; Bebi, P.; Elkin, C.M.; Schmatz, D.R.; Grêt–Regamey, A. Trade-Offs between Ecosystem Services in a Mountain Region. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Haines–Young, R.H.; Potschin, M.; Kienast, F. Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: Mapping marginal changes and trade-offs. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21, 39–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maes, J.; Paracchini, M.; Zulian, G.; Dunbar, M.; Alkemade, R. Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Boil. Conserv. 2012, 155, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelson, E.; Mendoza, G.; Regetz, J.; Polasky, S.; Tallis, H.; Cameron, D.; Chan, K.M.A.; Daily, G.C.; Goldstein, J.; Kareiva, P.M.; et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7, 4–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polasky, S.; Nelson, E.; Pennington, D.; Johnson, K.A. The Impact of Land-Use Change on Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity and Returns to Landowners: A Case Study in the State of Minnesota. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2010, 48, 219–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roces–Díaz, J.V.; Burkhard, B.; Kruse, M.; Müller, F.; Díaz-Varela, E.R.; Álvarez-Álvarez, P. Use of ecosystem information derived from forest thematic maps for spatial analysis of ecosystem services in northwestern Spain. Landsc. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 13, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boyd, J.; Banzhaf, S. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63, 616–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Costanza, R. Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed. Boil. Conserv. 2008, 141, 350–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fisher, B.; Turner, R. Ecosystem services: Classification for valuation. Boil. Conserv. 2008, 141, 1167–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ojea, E.; Martin-Ortega, J.; Chiabai, A. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for economic valuation: The case of forest water services. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wallace, K.J. Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions. Boil. Conserv. 2007, 139, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Costanza, R.; Farber, S.C.; Maxwell, J. Valuation and management of wetland ecosystems. Ecol. Econ. 1989, 1, 335–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- La Notte, A.; D’Amato, D.; Mäkinen, H.; Paracchini, M.L.; Liquete, C.; Egoh, B.; Geneletti, D.; Crossman, N.D. Ecosystem services classification: A systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework. Ecol. Indic. 2017, 74, 392–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bastian, O. The role of biodiversity in supporting ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 24, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hermann, A.; Schleifer, S.; Wrbka, T. The Concept of Ecosystem Services Regarding Landscape Research: A Review. Living Rev. Landsc. Res. 2011, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Albert, C.; Aronson, J.; Fürst, C.; Opdam, P. Integrating ecosystem services in landscape planning: Requirements, approaches, and impacts. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 29, 1277–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podschun, S.; Bastian, O.; Haase, D.; Heiland, S.; Kabisch, N.; Müller, F. Does the Ecosystem Service Concept Reach its Limits in Urban Environments? Landsc. Online 2017, 50, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
- Aulia, A.F.; Sandhu, H.; Millington, A.C. Quantifying the Economic Value of Ecosystem Services in Oil Palm Dominated Landscapes in Riau Province in Sumatra, Indonesia. Land 2020, 9, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CICES. Towards a Common Classification of Ecosystem Services. 2013. Available online: http://cices.eu/ (accessed on 10 July 2020).
- Von Haaren, C.; Albert, C. Integrating ecosystem services and environmental planning: Limitations and synergies. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2011, 7, 150–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bastian, O.; Grunewald, K.; Syrbe, R.-U.; Walz, U.; Wende, W. Landscape services: The concept and its practical relevance. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 29, 1463–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Termorshuizen, J.W.; Opdam, P. Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landsc. Ecol. 2009, 24, 1037–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartel, T.; Nita, A.; Rozylowicz, L. Understanding human–nature connections through value networks: The case of ancient wood-pastures of Central Romania. Sustain. Sci. 2020, 15, 1357–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pătru–Stupariu, I.; Nita, A.; Mustăţea, M.; Huzui–Stoiculescu, A.; Fürst, C. Using social network methodological approach to better understand human–wildlife interactions. Land Use Policy 2020, 99, 105009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kienast, F.; Bolliger, J.; Potschin, M.; de Groot, R.S.; Verburg, P.H.; Heller, I.; Wascher, D.; Haines-Young, R. Assessing landscape functions with broad-scale environmental data: Insights gained from a prototype development for Europe. Environ. Manag. 2009, 44, 1099–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Burkhard, B.; Kroll, F.; Nedkov, S.; Müller, F. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tratalos, J.; Haines-Young, R.; Potschin, M.; Fish, R.; Church, A. Cultural ecosystem services in the UK: Lessons on designing indicators to inform management and policy. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 61, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martín–López, B.; Leister, I.; Cruz, P.L.; Palomo, I.; Grêt–Regamey, A.; Harrison, P.A.; Lavorel, S.; Locatelli, B.; Luque, S.; Walz, A. Nature’s contributions to people in mountains: A review. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0217847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Metzger, M.J.; Schröter, D.; Leemans, R.; Cramer, W. A spatially explicit and quantitative vulnerability assessment of ecosystem service change in Europe. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2008, 8, 91–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Groot, R.; Alkemade, R.; Braat, L.; Hein, L.; Willemen, L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol. Complex. 2010, 7, 260–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nichols, E.; Larsen, T.; Spector, S.; Davis, A.; Escobar, F.; Favila, M.E.; Vulinec, K. Global dung beetle response to tropical forest modification and fragmentation: A quantitative literature review and meta-analysis. Boil. Conserv. 2007, 137, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Seppelt, R.; Dormann, C.; Eppink, F.; Lautenbach, S.; Schmidt, S. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: Approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 48, 630–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seppelt, R.; Fath, B.; Burkhard, B.; Fisher, J.L.; Grêt-Regamey, A.; Lautenbach, S.; Pert, P.L.; Hotes, S.; Spangenberg, J.; Verburg, P.H.; et al. Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iverson, L.R.; Echeverría, C.; Nahuelhual, L.; Luque, S.L. Ecosystem services in changing landscapes: An introduction. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 29, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolff, S.; Schulp, C.J.; Verburg, P.H. Mapping ecosystem services demand: A review of current research and future perspectives. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 55, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mengist, W.; Soromessa, T.; Legese, G. Ecosystem services research in mountainous regions: A systematic literature review on current knowledge and research gaps. Sci. Total. Environ. 2019, 702, 134581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duarte, G.T.; Santos, P.M.; Cornelissen, T.G.; Ribeiro, M.C.; Paglia, A.P. The effects of landscape patterns on ecosystem services: Meta-analyses of landscape services. Landsc. Ecol. 2018, 33, 1247–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hardelin, J.; Lankoski, J. Land Use and Ecosystem Services; OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balthazar, V.; Vanacker, V.; Molina, A.; Lambin, E.F. Impacts of forest cover change on ecosystem services in high Andean mountains. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 48, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kandziora, M.; Burkhard, B.; Müller, F. Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators—A theoretical matrix exercise. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 28, 54–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zulian, G.; Stange, E.; Woods, H.; Carvalho, L.; Dick, J.; Andrews, C.; Baró, F.; Vizcaino, P.; Barton, D.N.; Nowel, M.; et al. Practical application of spatial ecosystem service models to aid decision support. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 29, 465–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helfenstein, J.; Kienast, F. Ecosystem service state and trends at the regional to national level: A rapid assessment. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 36, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lautenbach, S.; Kugel, C.; Lausch, A.; Seppelt, R. Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data. Ecol. Indic. 2011, 11, 676–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grunewald, K.; Bastian, O. Ecosystem assessment and management as key tools for sustainable landscape development: A case study of the Ore Mountains region in Central Europe. Ecol. Model. 2015, 295, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bastian, O.; Syrbe, R.-U.; Slavik, J.; Moravec, J.; Louda, J.; Kochan, B.; Kochan, N.; Stutzriemer, S.; Berens, A. Ecosystem services of characteristic biotope types in the Ore Mountains (Germany/Czech Republic). Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2016, 13, 51–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerra, C.A.; Metzger, M.J.; Maes, J.; Pinto-Correia, T. Policy impacts on regulating ecosystem services: Looking at the implications of 60 years of landscape change on soil erosion prevention in a Mediterranean silvo-pastoral system. Landsc. Ecol. 2015, 31, 271–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uuemaa, E.; Mander, Ü.; Marja, R. Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: A review. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 28, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frank, S.; Fürst, C.; Koschke, L.; Makeschin, F. A contribution towards a transfer of the ecosystem service concept to landscape planning using landscape metrics. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syrbe, R.-U.; Walz, U. Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grêt–Regamey, A.; Rabe, S.-E.; Crespo, R.; Lautenbach, S.; Ryffel, A.; Schlup, B. On the importance of non-linear relationships between landscape patterns and the sustainable provision of ecosystem services. Landsc. Ecol. 2013, 29, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eigenbrod, F.; Armsworth, P.R.; Anderson, B.J.; Heinemeyer, A.; Gillings, S.; Roy, D.; Thomas, C.D.; Gaston, K.J. The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. J. Appl. Ecol. 2010, 47, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grêt–Regamey, A.; Weibel, B.; Bagstad, K.J.; Ferrari, M.; Geneletti, D.; Klug, H.; Schirpke, U.; Tappeiner, U. On the Effects of Scale for Ecosystem Services Mapping. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plieninger, T.; Dijks, S.; Oteros–Rozas, E.; Bieling, C. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 2013, 33, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sutton, C.P.; Costanza, R. Global estimates of market and non-market values derived from night-time satellite imagery, land cover, and ecosystem service valuation. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41, 509–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Troy, A.; Wilson, M.A. Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 60, 435–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vannier, C.; Lasseur, R.; Crouzat, E.; Byczek, C.; Lafond, V.; Cordonnier, T.; Longaretti, P.-Y.; Lavorel, S. Mapping ecosystem services bundles in a heterogeneous mountain region. Ecosyst. People 2019, 15, 74–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bahadur, K.C.K. Spatio-temporal patterns of agricultural expansion and its effect on watershed degradation: A case from the mountains of Nepal. Environ. Earth Sci. 2011, 65, 2063–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pelorosso, R.; Della Chiesa, S.; Tappeiner, U.; Leone, A.; Rocchini, D. Stability analysis for defining management strategies in abandoned mountain landscapes of the Mediterranean basin. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2011, 103, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pfund, J.-L.; Watts, J.D.; Boissière, M.; Boucard, A.; Bullock, R.M.; Ekadinata, A.; Dewi, S.; Feintrenie, L.; Levang, P.; Rantala, S.; et al. Understanding and Integrating Local Perceptions of Trees and Forests into Incentives for Sustainable Landscape Management. Environ. Manag. 2011, 48, 334–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Teferi, E.; Uhlenbrook, S.; Bewket, W.; Wenninger, J.; Simane, B. The use of remote sensing to quantify wetland loss in the Choke Mountain range, Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2010, 14, 2415–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van Oort, B.; Bhatta, L.D.; Baral, H.; Rai, R.K.; Dhakal, M.; Rucevska, I.; Adhikari, R. Assessing community values to support mapping of ecosystem services in the Koshi river basin, Nepal. Ecosyst. Serv. 2015, 13, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zoderer, B.M.; Tasser, E.; Erb, K.-H.; Stanghellini, P.S.L.; Tappeiner, U. Identifying and mapping the tourists’ perception of cultural ecosystem services: A case study from an Alpine region. Land Use Policy 2016, 56, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fürst, C.; Opdam, P.; Inostroza, L.; Luque, S.L. Evaluating the role of ecosystem services in participatory land use planning: Proposing a balanced score card. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 29, 1435–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naidoo, R.; Balmford, A.; Costanza, R.; Fisher, B.; Green, R.E.; Lehner, B.; Malcolm, T.R.; Ricketts, T.H. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 9495–9500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kandziora, M.; Burkhard, B.; Müller, F. Mapping provisioning ecosystem services at the local scale using data of varying spatial and temporal resolution. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 4, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, M.; Donato, D.C.; Romme, W.H. Consequences of spatial heterogeneity for ecosystem services in changing forest landscapes: Priorities for future research. Landsc. Ecol. 2012, 28, 1081–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daily, G.C. ECOLOGY: The Value of Nature and the Nature of Value. Science 2000, 289, 395–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bieling, C.; Plieninger, T.; Schaich, H. Patterns and causes of land change: Empirical results and conceptual considerations derived from a case study in the Swabian Alb, Germany. Land Use Policy 2013, 35, 192–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schirpke, U.; Leitinger, G.; Tappeiner, U.; Tasser, E. SPA-LUCC: Developing land-use/cover scenarios in mountain landscapes. Ecol. Inform. 2012, 12, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, J.D.; Skinner, C.N.; Safford, H.D.; Knapp, E.E.; Ramirez, C.M. Trends and causes of severity, size, and number of fires in northwestern California, USA. Ecol. Appl. 2012, 22, 184–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stürck, J.; Levers, C.; Van Der Zanden, E.H.; Schulp, C.J.; Verkerk, P.J.; Kuemmerle, T.; Helming, J.; Lotze-Campen, H.; Tabeau, A.; Popp, A.; et al. Simulating and delineating future land change trajectories across Europe. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2015, 18, 733–749. [Google Scholar]
- Byrd, K.; Flint, L.E.; Álvarez, P.; Casey, C.F.; Sleeter, B.M.; Soulard, C.E.; Flint, A.L.; Sohl, T.L. Integrated climate and land use change scenarios for California rangeland ecosystem services: Wildlife habitat, soil carbon, and water supply. Landsc. Ecol. 2015, 30, 729–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Petz, K.; Glenday, J.; Alkemade, R. Land management implications for ecosystem services in a South African rangeland. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 45, 692–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Briner, S.; Elkin, C.M.; Huber, R.; Grêt-Regamey, A. Assessing the impacts of economic and climate changes on land-use in mountain regions: A spatial dynamic modeling approach. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 149, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fisher, B.; Turner, R.K.; Morling, P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68, 643–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Diehl, K.; Burkhard, B.; Jacob, K. Should the ecosystem services concept be used in European Commission impact assessment? Ecol. Indic. 2016, 61, 6–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Albert, C.; Hauck, J.; Buhr, N.; Von Haaren, C. What ecosystem services information do users want? Investigating interests and requirements among landscape and regional planners in Germany. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 29, 1301–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manolache, S.; Nita, A.; Ciocanea, C.M.; Popescu, V.D.; Rozylowicz, L. Power, influence and structure in Natura 2000 governance networks. A comparative analysis of two protected areas in Romania. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 212, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frank, S.; Fürst, C.; Witt, A.; Koschke, L.; Makeschin, F. Making use of the ecosystem services concept in regional planning—trade-offs from reducing water erosion. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 29, 1377–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brauman, K.A.; Freyberg, D.L.; Daily, G.C. Land cover effects on groundwater recharge in the tropics: Ecohydrologic mechanisms. Ecohydrology 2011, 5, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haase, D.; Schwarz, N.; Strohbach, M.W.; Kroll, F.; Seppelt, R. Synergies, Trade-offs, and Losses of Ecosystem Services in Urban Regions: An Integrated Multiscale Framework Applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany. Ecol. Soc. 2012, 17, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sen, G.; Bayramoglu, M.M.; Toksoy, D. Spatiotemporal changes of land use patterns in high mountain areas of Northeast Turkey: A case study in Maçka. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015, 187, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dallimer, M.; Davies, Z.G.; Díaz-Porras, D.; Irvine, K.N.; Maltby, L.; Warren, P.H.; Armsworth, P.R.; Gaston, K.J. Historical influences on the current provision of multiple ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2015, 31, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Na, X.; Zang, S.Y.; Zhang, N.N.; Cui, J. Impact of land use and land cover dynamics on Zhalong wetland reserve ecosystem, Heilongjiang Province, China. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 12, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hu, H.; Liu, W.; Cao, M. Impact of land use and land cover changes on ecosystem services in Menglun, Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2007, 146, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huber, L.; Schirpke, U.; Marsoner, T.; Tasser, E.; Leitinger, G. Does socioeconomic diversification enhance multifunctionality of mountain landscapes? Ecosyst. Serv. 2020, 44, 101122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morán–Ordóñez, A.; Bugter, R.; Suarez-Seoane, S.; De Luis, E.; Calvo, L. Temporal Changes in Socio-Ecological Systems and Their Impact on Ecosystem Services at Different Governance Scales: A Case Study of Heathlands. Ecosystems 2013, 16, 765–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carpenter, S.R.; Mooney, H.A.; Agard, J.; Capistrano, D.; DeFries, R.S.; Díaz, S.; Dietz, T.; Duraiappah, A.K.; Oteng-Yeboah, A.; Pereira, H.M.; et al. Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 1305–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Raudsepp-Hearne, C.; Peterson, G.D.; Bennett, E.M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 5242–5247. [Google Scholar]
- Van Riper, C.J.; Kyle, G.T.; Sutton, S.G.; Barnes, M.; Sherrouse, B.C. Mapping outdoor recreationists’ perceived social values for ecosystem services at Hinchinbrook Island National Park, Australia. Appl. Geogr. 2012, 35, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Egoh, B.; Reyers, B.; Rouget, M.; Richardson, D.M.; Le Maitre, D.C.; Van Jaarsveld, A.S. Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 127, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayfield, N.; Barancok, P.; Furger, M.; Sebastià, M.-T.; Domínguez, G.; Lapka, M.; Cudlinova, E.; Vescovo, L.; Ganielle, D.; Cernusca, A.; et al. Stakeholder Perceptions of the Impacts of Rural Funding Scenarios on Mountain Landscapes Across Europe. Ecosystems 2008, 11, 1368–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haslett, J.R.; Berry, P.; Bela, G.; Jongman, R.H.G.; Pataki, G.; Samways, M.J.; Zobel, M. Changing conservation strategies in Europe: A framework integrating ecosystem services and dynamics. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19, 2963–2977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hauck, J.; Schweppe-Kraft, B.; Albert, C.; Görg, C.; Jensen, R.; Fürst, C.; Maes, J.; Ring, I.; Hönigová, I.; Burkhard, B.; et al. The Promise of the Ecosystem Services Concept for Planning and Decision-Making. GAIA—Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 2013, 22, 232–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Von Haaren, C.; Albert, C.; Barkmann, J.; De Groot, R.S.; Spangenberg, J.H.; Schröter–Schlaack, C.; Hansjürgens, B. From explanation to application: Introducing a practice-oriented ecosystem services evaluation (PRESET) model adapted to the context of landscape planning and management. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 29, 1335–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helming, K.; Diehl, K.; Geneletti, D.; Wiggering, H. Mainstreaming ecosystem services in European policy impact assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2013, 40, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vignola, R.; McDaniels, T.L.; Scholz, R.W. Governance structures for ecosystem-based adaptation: Using policy-network analysis to identify key organizations for bridging information across scales and policy areas. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 31, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McNeely, J.A. Protected areas for the 21st century: Working to provide benefits to society. Biodivers. Conserv. 1994, 3, 390–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monzón, J.; Palamar, M.B.; Moyer-Horner, L. Climate Change and Species Range Dynamics in Protected Areas. Bioscience 2011, 61, 752–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Farhad, S.; Gual, M.A.; Ruiz-Ballesteros, E. Linking governance and ecosystem services: The case of Isla Mayor (Andalusia, Spain). Land Use Policy 2015, 46, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Libert–Amico, A.; Trench, T.; Rodriguez, A.; del Pilar Martinez-Morales, M. Multilevel governance experiences in Mexico: Innovation For carbon emissions reduction in terrestrial ecosystems. Madera Y Bosques 2018, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Báliková, K.; Červená, T.; De Meo, I.; De Vreese, R.; Deniz, T.; El Mokaddem, A.; Kayacan, B.; Larabi, F.; Lībiete, Z.; Lyubenova, M.; et al. How Do Stakeholders Working on the Forest–Water Nexus Perceive Payments for Ecosystem Services? Forests 2019, 11, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Weiss, G.; Ramcilovic-Suominen, S.; Mavsar, R. Financing mechanisms for forest ecosystem services in Europe and their implications for forest governance. Allg. Forst und Jagdztg. 2011, 182, 61–69. [Google Scholar]
- Lambin, E.F.; Meyfroidt, P.; Rueda, X.; Blackman, A.; Börner, J.; Cerutti, P.O.; Dietsch, T.; Jungmann, L.; Lamarque, P.; Lister, J.; et al. Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2014, 28, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rode, J.; Wittmer, H.; Emerton, L.; Schröter-Schlaack, C. ‘Ecosystem service opportunities’: A practice-oriented framework for identifying economic instruments to enhance biodiversity and human livelihoods. J. Nat. Conserv. 2016, 33, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alarcon, G.G.; Fantini, A.C.; Salvador, C.H.; Farley, J. Additionality is in detail: Farmers’ choices regarding payment for ecosystem services programs in the Atlantic forest, Brazil. J. Rural. Stud. 2017, 54, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canova, M.A.; Lapola, D.M.; Pinho, P.; Dick, J.; Patricio, G.B.; Priess, J.A. Different ecosystem services, same (dis)satisfaction with compensation: A critical comparison between farmers’ perception in Scotland and Brazil. Ecosyst. Serv. 2019, 35, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benjamin, E.; Sauer, J. The cost effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services—Smallholders and agroforestry in Africa. Land Use Policy 2018, 71, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sikor, T.; Auld, G.; Bebbington, A.J.; Benjaminsen, T.A.; Gentry, B.S.; Hunsberger, C.; Izac, A.-M.; E Margulis, M.; Plieninger, T.; Schroeder, H.; et al. Global land governance: From territory to flow? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2013, 5, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Colavitti, A.M.; Serra, S. The role of regulation in the land-take control. The italian case of the metropolitan city of cagliari. Land Use Policy 2019, 83, 270–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.; Wolf, S.A. A targeted approach to payments for ecosystem services. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2019, 17, e00577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caro-Borrero, Á.P.; Corbera, E.; Neitzel, K.C.; Almeida-Leñero, L. “We are the city lungs”: Payments for ecosystem services in the outskirts of Mexico City. Land Use Policy 2015, 43, 138–148. [Google Scholar]
- Cadman, T.; Sarker, T.; Muttaqin, Z.; Nurfatriani, F.; Salminah, M.; Maraseni, T. The role of fiscal instruments in encouraging the private sector and smallholders to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: Evidence from Indonesia. For. Policy Econ. 2019, 108, 101913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hein, L.; Van Der Meer, P.J. REDD+ in the context of ecosystem management. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2012, 4, 604–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tegegne, Y.T.; Lindner, M.; Fobissie, K.; Kanninen, M. Evolution of drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in the Congo Basin forests: Exploring possible policy options to address forest loss. Land Use Policy 2016, 51, 312–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nita, A. Empowering impact assessments knowledge and international research collaboration—A bibliometric analysis of Environmental Impact Assessment Review journal. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2019, 78, 106283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hysing, E.; Lidskog, R. Policy Contestation over the Ecosystem Services Approach in Sweden. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2018, 31, 393–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cowling, R.M.; Egoh, B.; Knight, A.T.; O’Farrell, P.J.; Reyers, B.; Rouget, M.; Roux, D.J.; Welz, A.; Wilhelm-Rechman, A. An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 9483–9488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Primmer, E.; Jokinen, P.; Blicharska, M.; Barton, D.N.; Bugter, R.; Potschin, M. Governance of Ecosystem Services: A framework for empirical analysis. Ecosyst. Serv. 2015, 16, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Almenar, J.B.; Rugani, B.; Geneletti, D.; Brewer, T. Integration of ecosystem services into a conceptual spatial planning framework based on a landscape ecology perspective. Landsc. Ecol. 2018, 33, 2047–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lamarque, P.; Meyfroidt, P.; Nettier, B.; Lavorel, S. How Ecosystem Services Knowledge and Values Influence Farmers’ Decision-Making. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e107572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Method | Linkages to Ecosystem Services |
---|---|
Land use/ land cover change | Changes in LULC influence the provision of ES; spatial variation effect on the supply-side of the ecosystem services flow |
Landscape metrics | Changes in landscape pattern influence landscape functions and the provision of ES |
Mapping | Classification of land uses; scenario development for land use planning |
Landscape history | Understanding the evolution of landscape over time; it enables estimations of future ES |
Scenario development | Scenario modeling for the supply of ES under different land use planning strategies |
Type of Stakeholder | Approach to LU Change and ES | Benefits for Stakeholders |
---|---|---|
Residents | Mental maps | Ultimate beneficiaries of successful governance (identification of most pressing needs and significant opportunities) |
Local knowledge transfer during the policy formulation process | ||
Subnational decision-maker | Participatory assessment of ES | Inform decision-making process for management and planning |
Local planning process | ||
Impact assessment studies | ||
National policy decision-maker | Ex-ante policy assessment models of ES | Confirm and validate planning and policy measures, reducing uncertainties related to effects on future land uses |
Participatory planning | ||
Payments for ecosystem services |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pătru-Stupariu, I.; Hossu, C.A.; Grădinaru, S.R.; Nita, A.; Stupariu, M.-S.; Huzui-Stoiculescu, A.; Gavrilidis, A.-A. A Review of Changes in Mountain Land Use and Ecosystem Services: From Theory to Practice. Land 2020, 9, 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9090336
Pătru-Stupariu I, Hossu CA, Grădinaru SR, Nita A, Stupariu M-S, Huzui-Stoiculescu A, Gavrilidis A-A. A Review of Changes in Mountain Land Use and Ecosystem Services: From Theory to Practice. Land. 2020; 9(9):336. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9090336
Chicago/Turabian StylePătru-Stupariu, Ileana, Constantina Alina Hossu, Simona Raluca Grădinaru, Andreea Nita, Mihai-Sorin Stupariu, Alina Huzui-Stoiculescu, and Athanasios-Alexandru Gavrilidis. 2020. "A Review of Changes in Mountain Land Use and Ecosystem Services: From Theory to Practice" Land 9, no. 9: 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9090336
APA StylePătru-Stupariu, I., Hossu, C. A., Grădinaru, S. R., Nita, A., Stupariu, M.-S., Huzui-Stoiculescu, A., & Gavrilidis, A.-A. (2020). A Review of Changes in Mountain Land Use and Ecosystem Services: From Theory to Practice. Land, 9(9), 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9090336