Next Article in Journal
Bottom-Up Perspectives on the Re-Greening of the Sahel: An Evaluation of the Spatial Relationship between Soil and Water Conservation (SWC) and Tree-Cover in Burkina Faso
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Steering Energy Transitions through Landscape Governance: Case of Mathare Informal Settlement, Nairobi, Kenya
Open AccessArticle

Analysing and Applying Stakeholder Perceptions to Improve Protected Area Governance in Ugandan Conservation Landscapes

1
International Union for Conservation of Nature, Rue Mauverney 28, 1196 Gland, Switzerland
2
Institute of Geography and Sustainability, Faculty of Geosciences and the Environment, University of Lausanne, Géopolis, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
3
Biology department, Faculty of Science and Education, Busitema University, Jinja-Malaba Road, Tororo P.O. Box 236, Uganda
4
School of Forestry, Environmental and Geographical Sciences, Makerere University, University Road, Kampala 7062, Uganda
5
Tree Talk Plus, Plot 842 Lugolobi Close, Sempagala Zone-Buye, Ntinda-Kampala, Uganda
6
JC Holdings Ltd., Kampala P.O. Box 34857, Uganda
7
Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Str. 4, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2020, 9(6), 207; https://doi.org/10.3390/land9060207
Received: 15 May 2020 / Revised: 18 June 2020 / Accepted: 18 June 2020 / Published: 25 June 2020
Given the diversity of active institutions and stakeholders in a landscape, and the difficulties in ensuring inclusive decision-making, evaluating landscape governance can help surface and address underlying issues. In the context of two protected area landscapes in Uganda, where landscape approaches are being implemented through a wider project on landscape governance, we analyse stakeholder perceptions of inclusive decision-making and then use this evaluation to stimulate dialogue amongst stakeholder groups in each landscape. We ask, how can capturing, analysing, and collaboratively applying people’s perceptions address inclusive decision-making in landscape governance? We collected and analysed perceptions using SenseMaker®, a software package that enables analysis of micronarratives (stories) from the field based on how respondents classify their own stories, using triads, dyads, stones, and multiple-choice questions. This self-categorisation by the respondent reduces bias in the analysis and allows the micronarrative to be cross-examined in a variety of ways when analysed using Sensemaker. This analysis created an integrated view of the stakeholder’s perceptions about inclusive decision-making in landscape governance. The results show large portions of the respondents feel their voices are neglected, and management of the landscape is poor in Mount Elgon, while in Agoro-Agu, it is the opposite trend. During a community feedback process, reasons for these trends were discussed and solutions proposed. Some of the underlying factors include historical relationships with park authorities and displacement during park creation. To more precisely answer our research question, one could have extended stays in the communities studied in these landscapes, using ethnographic methods including interviews and participant observation; nonetheless, our method, including the feedback process, was an innovative and important way to confront our findings with the informants directly and foster collaborative action. We conclude that understanding people’s perceptions, including through participatory feedback, can significantly inform and improve management decisions, help resolve conflicts, and facilitate dialogue between different stakeholders in the landscape. View Full-Text
Keywords: perceptions; Agoro-Agu; Mount Elgon; inclusive decision-making; dialogue; SenseMaker®; communities; landscape governance; Uganda perceptions; Agoro-Agu; Mount Elgon; inclusive decision-making; dialogue; SenseMaker®; communities; landscape governance; Uganda
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Omoding, J.; Walters, G.; Andama, E.; Carvalho, S.; Colomer, J.; Cracco, M.; Eilu, G.; Kiyingi, G.; Kumar, C.; Langoya, C.D.; Nakangu Bugembe, B.; Reinhard, F.; Schelle, C. Analysing and Applying Stakeholder Perceptions to Improve Protected Area Governance in Ugandan Conservation Landscapes. Land 2020, 9, 207.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop