Next Article in Journal
Land Registration, Adjustment Experience, and Agricultural Machinery Adoption: Empirical Analysis from Rural China
Previous Article in Journal
Unveiling Contrasting Preferred Trajectories of Local Development in Southeast Portugal
Open AccessArticle

Migration, Remittances, and Forest Cover Change in Rural Guatemala and Chiapas, Mexico

School of Economics and Business, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway
Centre for Development and the Environment, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1116, Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway
African Development Bank (AfDB), Microeconomic, Institutional & Development Impact Division, Abidjan 01, Ivory Coast
Centro de Estudios Ambientales y Biodiversidad, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala 01015, Guatemala
Department of Geography and the Environment, University of Denver, Boettcher Center West, 2050 E. Iliff Ave. Denver, CO 80208, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 28 January 2020 / Revised: 10 March 2020 / Accepted: 11 March 2020 / Published: 17 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Migration and Land)
This article investigates how migration and remittances affect forest cover in eight rural communities in Guatemala and Chiapas, Mexico. Based on household surveys and remote sensing data, we found little evidence to support the widespread claim that migration takes pressure off forests. In the Chiapas sites, we observed no significant changes in forest cover since 1990, while in the Guatemalan sites, migration may have increased demand for agricultural land, leading to an average annual forest loss of 0.73% during the first decade of the millennium. We suggest that when attractive opportunities exist to invest in agriculture and land expansion, remittances and returnee savings provide fresh capital that is likely to increase pressure on forests. Our study also has implications for the understanding of migration flows; in particular, migration has not implied an exodus out of agriculture for the remaining household members nor for the returning migrants. On the contrary, returning migrants are more likely to be involved in farming activities after their return than they were before leaving. View Full-Text
Keywords: remittances; forest transition; agriculture remittances; forest transition; agriculture
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Angelsen, A.; Aguilar-Støen, M.; Ainembabazi, J.H.; Castellanos, E.; Taylor, M. Migration, Remittances, and Forest Cover Change in Rural Guatemala and Chiapas, Mexico. Land 2020, 9, 88.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop