Next Article in Journal
From “Land to the Tiller” to the “New Landlords”? The Debate over Vietnam’s Latest Land Reforms
Next Article in Special Issue
The Tenure Guidelines in Policy and Practice: Democratizing Land Control in Guatemala
Previous Article in Journal
Reflections on How State–Civil Society Collaborations Play out in the Context of Land Grabbing in Argentina
Previous Article in Special Issue
Land of Plenty, Land of Misery: Synergetic Resource Grabbing in Mozambique
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Rights in the Time of Populism: Land and Institutional Change Amid the Reemergence of Right-Wing Authoritarianism in Colombia

by Sergio Coronado 1,2,†
1
Otto-Suhr-Institute of Political Science, Freie Universität—Berlin. Ihnestr. 22, 14195 Berlin, Germany
2
Political Ecology Research Group, the International Institute of Social Studies, Kortenaerkade 12, 2518 AX The Hague, The Netherlands
Associated Researcher at Cinep/PPP, Bogotá Cra 5 No. 33B-02, Colombia.
Land 2019, 8(8), 119; https://doi.org/10.3390/land8080119
Received: 19 June 2019 / Revised: 25 July 2019 / Accepted: 27 July 2019 / Published: 31 July 2019
In Colombia, right-wing leadership returned to power after winning the presidential elections in 2018 in a campaign in which they opposed the previous government, primarily because of the negotiations and peacemaking with the FARC-EP (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia—Ejército del Pueblo ‘Armed Revolutionary Forces of Colombia—People’s Army’), Colombia’s largest guerrilla organization. Globally, there is a vibrant academic debate about how to characterize the current rise of right-wing populism or authoritarianism, but more profound insights from each country’s situation and its political economy implications are needed. The victory in Colombia was due to numerous factors, including the support from some rural elites who have historically obstructed the enforcement of redistributive land policies. However, the populist aspirations of the right-wing government have been persistently frustrated not only by social unrest and political mobilization but also because of the enforcement of institutions previously incorporated into the country’s political scenario. Specifically, in terms of agrarian political economy, two sets of human rights-oriented institutional changes are relevant regarding this matter: (a) the Land Restitution Law enacted in 2011 and (b) the Comprehensive Rural Reform contained in the Agrarian Chapter of the Peace Agreement between the national government and the FARC-EP in 2016. The purpose of this paper is to ground the ongoing theoretical and political debate about the rise of different forms of populism and right-wing authoritarianism in the current Colombian political context, and its implications on the countryside. The analytical contribution of this paper is twofold: On the one hand, I propose an alternative for explaining the nature of the current political regime in Colombia as right-wing authoritarianism; on the other hand, I analyze some features of such regimes in terms of its disputes with the enforcement of human rights-oriented institutions, that are in force as the result of political processes triggered by peasants’ mobilization. View Full-Text
Keywords: authoritarianism; populism; institutional change; agrarian policies; human rights; land restitution; peace agreement; rural politics; Colombia authoritarianism; populism; institutional change; agrarian policies; human rights; land restitution; peace agreement; rural politics; Colombia
MDPI and ACS Style

Coronado, S. Rights in the Time of Populism: Land and Institutional Change Amid the Reemergence of Right-Wing Authoritarianism in Colombia. Land 2019, 8, 119.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop