Next Article in Journal
Central Place Theory Reloaded and Revised: Political Economy and Landscape Dynamics in the Longue Durée
Next Article in Special Issue
Emerging Paradigms for Biodiversity and Protected Areas
Previous Article in Journal
One City for All? The Characteristics of Residential Displacement in Southwest Washington, DC
Previous Article in Special Issue
Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas (IPCAs), Aichi Target 11 and Canada’s Pathway to Target 1: Focusing Conservation on Reconciliation
Article Menu
Issue 2 (February) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessPerspective

Globalization and Biodiversity Conservation Problems: Polycentric REDD+ Solutions

Wildlife Works, P.O. Box 310, Voi 80300, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
Department of Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
School of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, Karatina University, P.O. Box 1957, Karatina 10101, Kenya
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 21 November 2018 / Revised: 14 December 2018 / Accepted: 15 December 2018 / Published: 19 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biodiversity and Protected Areas)
Full-Text   |   PDF [596 KB, uploaded 26 February 2019]   |  


Protected areas are considered the cornerstone of biodiversity conservation, but face multiple problems in delivering this core objective. The growing trend of framing biodiversity and protected area values in terms of ecosystem services and human well-being may not always lead to biodiversity conservation. Although globalization is often spoken about in terms of its adverse effects to the environment and biodiversity, it also heralds unprecedented and previously inaccessible opportunities linked to ecosystem services. Biodiversity and related ecosystem services are amongst the common goods hardest hit by globalization. Yet, interconnectedness between people, institutions, and governments offers a great chance for globalization to play a role in ameliorating some of the negative impacts. Employing a polycentric governance approach to overcome the free-rider problem of unsustainable use of common goods, we argue here that REDD+, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) climate change mitigation scheme, could be harnessed to boost biodiversity conservation in the face of increasing globalization, both within classic and novel protected areas. We believe this offers a timely example of how an increasingly globalized world connects hitherto isolated peoples, with the ability to channel feelings and forces for biodiversity conservation. Through the global voluntary carbon market, REDD+ can enable and empower, on the one hand, rural communities in developing countries contribute to mitigation of a global problem, and on the other, individuals or societies in the West to help save species they may never see, yet feel emotionally connected to. View Full-Text
Keywords: carbon finance; global commons; jurisdictional; nested approaches; public goods carbon finance; global commons; jurisdictional; nested approaches; public goods

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Githiru, M.; Njambuya, J.W. Globalization and Biodiversity Conservation Problems: Polycentric REDD+ Solutions. Land 2019, 8, 35.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Land EISSN 2073-445X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top