Ecological and Economic Sustainability in Resource-Based Cities: A Case Study of Ecosystem Services, Drivers, and Compensation Strategies in Xinzhou, China
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Study Area and Data Sources
2.1. Overview of the Study Area
2.2. Data Sources
3. Research Methods
3.1. Land Use Evolution Analysis Model
3.2. ESV Quantification and Assessment
3.3. Spatial Statistical Analysis of ESV Distribution
3.4. ESV Sensitivity Coefficient
3.5. Analysis of ESV Driving Factors
3.6. ESV-Based Ecological Compensation
4. Results
4.1. Spatiotemporal Evolution of Land Use
4.1.1. Spatiotemporal Patterns of Land Use
4.1.2. Patterns of Land Use Structure Transformation
4.2. Spatiotemporal Evolution of ESV
4.2.1. Spatiotemporal Patterns of ESV Distribution
4.2.2. Sensitivity Response of ESV Evolution
4.3. Driving Factors of ESV
4.3.1. Stepwise Regression Analysis Based on SPSS
4.3.2. Analysis of Driving Factors Based on the Geographical Detector
4.4. Ecological Compensation Patterns
4.4.1. Non-Market Value of Ecosystem Service Functions
4.4.2. Spatial Distribution of Ecological Compensation Amounts
5. Discussion
5.1. Feasibility of the Research Framework
5.2. Spatiotemporal Evolution of Land Use Structure and ESV
5.3. Driving Mechanisms of ESV
5.4. Ecological Compensation Policy
- (1)
- Classification Criteria
- (2)
- Goal Formulation
- (3)
- Strategy Development
5.5. Research Limitations
6. Conclusions
- (1)
- Land-use dynamics and spatial reconstruction.
- (2)
- Spatial evolution of ESV.
- (3)
- Driving mechanisms and synergistic interactions.
- (4)
- Spatial prioritization of ecological compensation.
- (5)
- Institutional framework and policy recommendations.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Appendix A.1
| Primary ESV | Secondary ESV | 2000 (CNY 100 Million) | 2010 (CNY 100 Million) | 2023 (CNY 100 Million) | 2000–2010 | 2010–2023 | 2000–2023 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change (CNY 100 Million) | Rate (%) | Change (CNY 100 Million) | Rate (%) | Change (CNY 100 Million) | Rate (%) | |||||
| Provisioning | Food production | 12.86 | 11.95 | 11.69 | −0.91 | −7.08 | −0.26 | −2.18 | −1.17 | −9.10 |
| Raw materials | 21.14 | 19.67 | 19.40 | −1.47 | −6.95 | −0.27 | −1.37 | −1.74 | −8.23 | |
| Water Provisioning | 4.66 | 4.89 | 5.01 | 0.23 | 4.94 | 0.12 | 2.45 | 0.35 | 7.51 | |
| Regulating | Gas regulation | 33.44 | 34.14 | 34.67 | 0.7 | 2.09 | 0.53 | 1.55 | 6.36 | 8.12 |
| Climate regulation | 78.37 | 82.30 | 84.73 | 3.93 | 5.01 | 2.43 | 2.95 | 1.96 | 7.95 | |
| Environmental Purification | 24.65 | 25.95 | 26.61 | 1.3 | 5.27 | 0.66 | 2.54 | 4.31 | 7.48 | |
| Hydrologic regulation | 57.60 | 60.40 | 61.91 | 2.8 | 4.86 | 1.51 | 2.50 | 1.11 | 2.59 | |
| Supporting | Soil conservation | 42.82 | 43.36 | 43.93 | 0.54 | 1.26 | 0.57 | 1.31 | 2.47 | 7.90 |
| Nutrient Cycling | 3.69 | 3.67 | 3.70 | −0.02 | −0.54 | 0.03 | 0.82 | 1.08 | 7.81 | |
| Biodiversity protection | 31.25 | 32.89 | 33.72 | 1.64 | 5.25 | 0.83 | 2.52 | 15.98 | 4.93 | |
| Cultural | Esthetic landscape | 13.83 | 14.55 | 14.91 | 0.72 | 5.21 | 0.36 | 2.47 | 0.35 | 7.51 |
| Total | 324.30 | 333.77 | 340.28 | 22.24 | 2.92 | 6.51 | 1.95 | 1.23 | 3.68 | |
Appendix A.2
| Algorithm A1. An Algorithm for Analyzing Driving Factors of Ecosystem Service Value Based on Stepwise Regression and Geographical Detector |
| # ----------------------------------------- |
| # Step 0: Data Preparation |
| # ----------------------------------------- |
| Input: ESV dataset (Y), candidate driving factors (X1, X2, …, Xk) |
| Preprocess: |
| - Standardize or normalize variables if needed |
| - Check multicollinearity among X variables |
| - Ensure spatial units are consistent |
| # ----------------------------------------- |
| # Step 1: Stepwise Regression |
| # ----------------------------------------- |
| Initialize model M with no predictors |
| CandidateSet = {X1, X2, …, Xk} |
| While CandidateSet is not empty: |
| For each variable Xi in CandidateSet: |
| Fit regression model M + Xi |
| Compute model AIC/BIC/p-value |
| Select Xi* that improves model fit the most |
| If Xi* is statistically significant: |
| Add Xi* to model M |
| Remove Xi* from CandidateSet |
| Else: |
| Break |
| Output: |
| - Selected predictors S = {Xs1, Xs2, …} |
| - Regression coefficients β |
| - Direction and magnitude of influence |
| # ----------------------------------------- |
| # Step 2: Geographical Detector Model (GDM) |
| # ----------------------------------------- |
| For each factor Xi in S: |
| Discretize Xi into strata (e.g., natural breaks) |
| Compute q(Xi) using: |
| q = 1−(Σ(Ni ∗ σi2)/(N ∗ σ2) ) |
| For each pair of factors (Xi, Xj): |
| Overlay strata of Xi and Xj |
| Compute q(Xi ∩ Xj) |
| Compare q(Xi ∩ Xj) with q(Xi), q(Xj), q(Xi) + q(Xj) |
| Determine interaction type: |
| - Nonlinear weakening |
| - Univariate nonlinear weakening |
| - Bivariate enhancement |
| - Independence |
| - Nonlinear enhancement |
| Output: |
| - q-values for single factors |
| - q-values for interactions |
| - Interaction classification |
| # ----------------------------------------- |
| # Step 3: Interpretation |
| # ----------------------------------------- |
| Combine results: |
| - Use stepwise regression to interpret direction & magnitude |
| - Use GDM to interpret spatial heterogeneity & interactions |
| - Identify key drivers and dominant interaction mechanisms |
| End |
References
- Xia, H.; Yuan, S.; Prishchepov, A.V. Spatial-temporal heterogeneity of ecosystem service interactions and their social-ecological drivers: Implications for spatial planning and management. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 189, 106767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hui, H.; Zhang, J.J.; Xu, Q.; Luo, G.F. The impact of land use change on ecological carbon sequestration of mining city. In Legislation, Technology and Practice of Mine Land Reclamation; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Han, J.; Lin, J. Response of land use and net primary productivity to coal mining: A case study of Huainan city and its mining areas. Land 2022, 11, 973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, C.; Li, H.; Jia, X.; Li, Q. Improving resource utilization efficiency in China’s mineral resource-based cities: A case study of Chengde, Hebei province. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2015, 94, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, S.Y.; Lee, J.; Zhou, T.; Wu, D. Shrinking cities and resource-based economy: The economic restructuring in China’s mining cities. Cities 2017, 60, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, Q.; Wu, Z.; Xie, D. Transformation and development of resource-based cities in China: A review and bibliometric analysis. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 975669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiao, W.; Zhang, X.; Li, C.; Guo, J. Sustainable transition of mining cities in China: Literature review and policy analysis. Resour. Policy 2021, 74, 101867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, Y.; Bai, Z.; Zhang, J.; Xu, C. Increasing urban ecological resilience based on ecological security pattern: A case study in a resource-based city. Ecol. Eng. 2022, 175, 106486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, W.; Yu, Q.; Xu, C.; Zhao, J.; Wang, Y.; Miao, Y. Construction and optimization of ecological spatial network in typical mining cities of the Yellow River Basin: The case study of Shenmu City, Shaanxi. Ecol. Process. 2024, 13, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, C.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Z.; Huang, Q. Characteristics and progress of land use/cover change research during 1990–2018. J. Geogr. Sci. 2022, 32, 537–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Niu, X.; Hu, Y.; Yan, H.; Zhen, L. Temporal and spatial evolution characteristics and its driving mechanism of land use/land cover change in Laos from 2000 to 2020. Land 2022, 11, 1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, B.L.; Lambin, E.F.; Reenberg, A. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 20666–20671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sujetovienė, G.; Dabašinskas, G. Ecosystem service value changes in response to land use dynamics in Lithuania. Land 2023, 12, 2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Zhan, J.; Zhao, F.; Yan, H.; Zhang, F.; Wei, X. Impacts of urbanization-induced land-use changes on ecosystem services: A case study of the Pearl River Delta Metropolitan Region, China. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 98, 228–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, T.; Xin, X.; He, F.; Wang, X.; Chen, K. How to promote sustainable land use in Hangzhou Bay, China? A decision framework based on fuzzy multiobjective optimization and spatial simulation. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 414, 137576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, C.; Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, Z.; Nie, X.; Hu, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Zhu, D.; et al. Spatiotemporal dislocation of urbanization and ecological construction increased the ecosystem service supply and demand imbalance. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 288, 112478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jing, X.; He, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wang, M.; Wang, X. Spatial–Temporal Divergence and Coupling Analysis of Land Use Change and Ecosystem Service Value in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; Yang, T. Assessing Impact of Land Use Change on the Ecosystem Service Value in Yinchuan City from 1980 to 2018. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Ma, E.; Liao, L.; Wu, M. Land Use Change in a Typical Transect in Northern China and Its Impact on the Ecological Environment. Sustainability 2024, 16, 9291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, X.W.; Feng, G.; Su, P.; He, G.; Zou, Y.; Wang, X. Spatiotemporal evolution of land use and habitat quality assessment in the suburbs of metropolitan. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng 2021, 37, 275–284. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, B.; Feng, Q.; Lu, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhang, B.; Cheng, W. Ecosystem service value and ecological compensation in Qilian Mountain National Park: Implications for ecological conservation strategies. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 167, 112661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daily, G.C. Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems (1997). In The Future of Nature; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 2013; pp. 454–464. [Google Scholar]
- Song, S.; Xiong, K.; Chi, Y. Grassland Ecosystem Service and Its Enlightenment on the Revitalization of Rural Ecological Animal Husbandry in the Rocky Desertification Area: A Literature Review. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2022, 31, 4499–4510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, Y.; Chen, T.; Wang, J.; Xu, X. Analyzing the factors driving the changes of ecosystem service value in the Liangzi lake basin—A geoDetector-based application. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Li, X.; Tao, H.; Yang, Q.; Liu, Z.; Li, J. Synergistic Evolution Characteristics and Driving Factors of High-Quality Economic Development and Green Space Ecological Benefits at Multiple Spatial Scales: Evidence from Shanxi Province, China. Land 2025, 14, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouyang, Z.; Zheng, H.; Xiao, Y.; Polasky, S.; Liu, J.; Xu, W.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, L.; Xiao, Y.; Rao, E.; et al. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science 2016, 352, 1455–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costanza, R.; d’Arge, R.; De Groot, R.; Farber, S.; Grasso, M.; Hannon, B.; Limburg, K.; Naeem, S.; O’neill, R.V.; Paruelo, J.; et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, G.D.; Zhen, L.; Lu, C.X.; Xiao, Y.; Chen, C. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. J. Nat. Resour. 2008, 23, 911–919. [Google Scholar]
- Su, S.; Li, D.; Hu, Y.N.; Xiao, R.; Zhang, Y. Spatially non-stationary response of ecosystem service value changes to urbanization in Shanghai, China. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 45, 332–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Hou, Y. Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing mechanisms of ecosystem service value in the Tarim River Basin, Northwest China. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Liu, S. Exploring the spatial–temporal patterns of urban ecosystem service relationships and their driving mechanisms: A case study of Wuhu City, China. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 167, 112726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Xie, B.; Li, J.; Yuan, C. Spatiotemporal distribution and driving force analysis of the ecosystem service value in the Fujiang River Basin, China. Land 2023, 12, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, N.; Guan, Q.; Wang, Q.; Sun, Y.; Li, H.; Ma, Y. Spatial differentiation and driving mechanisms in ecosystem service value of arid region: A case study in the middle and lower reaches of Shule River Basin, NW China. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 319, 128718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, X.; Zhao, L.; Ma, T.; Zhao, Z.; Hu, B. Scale Effects on Ecosystem Service Interactions and Driving Factors in the Three River Source Basin: Insights and Management Implications. Water 2024, 16, 3425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Y.; Xu, C. Knowledge diffusion of Geodetector: A perspective of the literature review and Geotree. Heliyon 2023, 9, e19651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, H.; Xie, W.; Yang, L.; Du, A.; Almeida, C.M.; Wang, Y. From payments for ecosystem services to eco-compensation: Conceptual change or paradigm shift? Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 700, 134627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rasheed, S.; Venkatesh, P.; Singh, D.R.; Renjini, V.R.; Jha, G.K.; Sharma, D.K. Ecosystem valuation and eco-compensation for conservation of traditional paddy ecosystems and varieties in Kerala, India. Ecosyst. Serv. 2021, 49, 101272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Niu, J. Ecological Compensation and Comprehensive Zoning of Cultivated Land Based on Ecosystem Service Value and Extended Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Model: A Case Study of Shandong Province. Land 2025, 14, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cole, S.; Moksnes, P.O.; Söderqvist, T.; Wikström, S.A.; Sundblad, G.; Hasselström, L.; Bergström, U.; Kraufvelin, P.; Bergström, L. Environmental compensation for biodiversity and ecosystem services: A flexible framework that addresses human wellbeing. Ecosyst. Serv. 2021, 50, 101319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nie, X.; Li, X.; Lyu, C.; Su, Y.; Wang, H. Can ecological compensation based on the transfer of development rights (TDR) improve ecosystem service value? A multi-scenario simulation. Land Use Policy 2024, 138, 107024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, H.; Yang, F. Horizontal ecological compensation as a tool for sustainable development of urban agglomerations: Exploration of the realization mechanism of Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration in China. Environ. Sci. Policy 2022, 137, 301–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jayalath, T.A.; Grala, R.K.; Grado, S.C.; Evans, D.L. Increasing provision of ecosystem services through participation in a conservation program. Ecosyst. Serv. 2021, 50, 101303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zakeri, E.; Mousavi, S.A.; Karimzadeh, H. Designing a payment for ecosystem services scheme, the practical obstacles for implementation in arid and semiarid rangelands. Rangel. J. 2020, 42, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, X.; Shen, J.; He, W.; Zhao, X.; Li, Z.; Hu, W.; Wang, J.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, X. Spatial-temporal analysis of ecosystem services value and research on ecological compensation in Taihu Lake Basin of Jiangsu Province in China from 2005 to 2018. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 317, 128241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Xiao, S.; Wang, J.; Yu, J.; Peng, B. Research on Ecological Compensation Mechanism Based on Ecosystem Service Value: A Case Study of the Tingjiang River Basin. Sustainability 2024, 16, 10788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.; Yang, L.; Min, Q.; Sang, W. Theoretical framework for eco-compensation to national parks in China. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 24, e01296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, H.; Xu, J.; Gao, S. Modeling the dynamics of urban and ecological binary space for regional coordination: A case of Fuzhou coastal areas in Southeast China. Habitat Int. 2018, 72, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiangyi, L.; Shiquan, D. Eco-compensation in China: Achievement, experience, improvement. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 60867–60884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miao, J.; Wu, Q.; Wang, Z.; Wu, J. Eco-compensation mechanism construction of Chongyi Hakka terrace ecosystem. Adv. Transdiscipl. Eng. 2023, 68, 338–345. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Yang, Y.; Liu, D.; Zhang, Y. Multi-stakeholder participation in eco-compensation policy-making and implementation: A case study from China. Land Use Policy 2021, 101, 105190. [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, W.; Qu, L.; Li, K.; Guo, C.; Li, J. An assessment of the rational range of eco-compensation standards: A case study in the Nujiang Prefecture, Southwestern China. Land 2022, 11, 1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, W.; Wu, T.; Fu, B. The value of ecosystem services in China: A systematic review for twenty years. Ecosyst. Serv. 2021, 52, 101365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Fan, Y.; Wang, M.; Sun, T.; Liu, J. Ecological compensation in the Chinese coal resource-depleted cities based on the ecosystem service value. Glob. Nest J. 2025, 27, 06506. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, G.D.; Xiao, N.; Liu, K.; Xu, H.P.; Bo, H.Z. Impacts of Coal Mining Subsidence on Land Use and Ecological Services in Taibai Lake District in Jining City, China. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2025, 23, 9101–9120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, F.; Zhu, S.; Guo, J.; Sun, X. Exploring the quality of ecosystem services and the segmental impact of influencing factors in resource-based cities. J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 375, 124411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, S.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, J.; Wang, S. Analysis of spatial-temporal differentiation and influencing factors of ecosystem services in resource-based cities in semiarid regions. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, L.; Ye, X.; Lee, J.; Lu, X.; Zheng, L.; Wu, K. Effects of urbanization on ecosystem service values in a mineral resource-based city. Habitat Int. 2015, 46, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariq, A.; Yan, J.; Mumtaz, F. Land change modeler and CA-Markov chain analysis for land use land cover change using satellite data of Peshawar, Pakistan. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2022, 128, 103286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansour, S.; Al-Belushi, M.; Al-Awadhi, T. Monitoring land use and land cover changes in the mountainous cities of Oman using GIS and CA-Markov modelling techniques. Land Use Policy 2020, 91, 104414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Xie, H.; Shi, J.; Lv, T.; Zhou, C.; Liu, W. Assessing changes in ecosystem service values in response to land cover dynamics in Jiangxi Province, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, H. Response of ecosystem service values to land use change, 2002–2021. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 160, 111947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, M.G.; Gardner, R.H.; O’neill, R.V. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, C.; Wang, Z. Multi-scenario simulation and evaluation of the impacts of land use change on ecosystem service values in the Chishui River Basin of Guizhou Province, China. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 163, 112078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyu, R.; Clarke, K.C.; Zhang, J.; Feng, J.; Jia, X.; Li, J. Dynamics of spatial relationships among ecosystem services and their determinants: Implications for land use system reform in Northwestern China. Land Use Policy 2021, 102, 105231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kreuter, U.P.; Harris, H.G.; Matlock, M.D.; Lacey, R.E. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas. Ecol. Econ. 2001, 39, 333–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, H. An ecosystem service valuation of land use change in Taiyuan City, China. Ecol. Model. 2012, 225, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kafle, S.C. Correlation and regression analysis using SPSS. OCEM J. Manag. Technol. Soc. Sci. 2019, 1, 125–132. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.F.; Zhang, T.L.; Fu, B.J. A measure of spatial stratified heterogeneity. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 67, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fen, L.; Wenhua, L.; Lin, Z.; Heqing, H.; Yunjie, W.; Naomi, I. Estimating eco-compensation requirements for forest ecosystem conservation: A case study in Hainan province, southern China. Outlook Agric. 2011, 40, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, H.; Shao, C.; Wang, X.; Hao, C. Transformation path of ecological product value and efficiency evaluation: The case of the Qilihai wetland in Tianjin. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 14575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H. Land use trade-offs associated with protected areas in China: Current state, existing evaluation methods, future application of ecosystem service valuation. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 711, 134688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Liu, X.; Yang, L.; Zhu, Z. Variations in ecosystem service value and its driving factors in the Nanjing Metropolitan Area of China. Forests 2023, 14, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çağlıyan, A.; Dağlı, D. Monitoring land use land cover changes and modelling of urban growth using a future land use simulation model (FLUS) in Diyarbakır, Turkey. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adjei, E.; Li, W.; Narine, L.; Zhang, Y. What drives land use change in the southern us? A case study of Alabama. Forests 2023, 14, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiandraza, F.; Qu, S.; Hu, S.; Mkono, C.N.; Tikhomirova, A.; Randrialahamady, S.N. Response of ecosystem services to land use change in Madagascar island, Africa: A multi-scale perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, H.H.; Wu, S.R.; Ji, Q.Q.; Du, Z.Q.; Zhang, H. Spatio-temporal pattern and driving forces of ecosystem services in coalfields of Shanxi Province, China. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2021, 32, 3923–3932. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.; Zhou, S.; Li, X.; Liu, H.; Chi, D.; Xu, K. The influence of climate change and human activities on ecosystem service value. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 87, 224–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, L.; Tian, J.; Peng, Y.; Huang, Y.; He, X.; Bai, X.; Bai, T. Effects of climate change on ecosystem services and their components in southern hills and northern grasslands in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 44916–44935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wübbelmann, T.; Förster, K.; Bouwer, L.M.; Dworczyk, C.; Bender, S.; Burkhard, B. Urban flood regulating ecosystem services under climate change: How can Nature-based Solutions contribute? Front. Water 2023, 5, 1081850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Yang, M.; Mou, Y.; Meng, Y.; Zhou, X.; Peng, C. Effect of urbanization on ecosystem service values in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration of China from 2000 to 2014. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Chen, D.; Zou, Q. China’s green transformation under the dual incentives of economic growth and environmental protection. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 2025, 102, 104150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, Z.; Wang, Y.; Ma, L.; Yang, J.; Hou, H.; Wang, J.; Xiong, J.; Zhang, S. Investigating Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs and Synergies: The Need for Correlations and Driving Factors in the Upper Fen River Basin of Shanxi Province, China. Land 2024, 13, 1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghose, M.K. Effect of opencast mining on soil fertility. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 2004, 63, 1006–1009. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, Z.; Yu, D.; Wang, K.; Lv, A. Ecosystem services value evaluation and strategies of payment for ecosystem service in western Jiangxi Province. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2020, 40, 7507–7518. [Google Scholar]
- Guan, X.; Liu, M.; Meng, Y. A comprehensive ecological compensation indicator based on pollution damage–protection bidirectional model for river basin. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 126, 107708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Chen, L.; Chen, Z.; Deng, X.; Huang, J.; Hou, Y. Study on Influencing Factors of Willingness to Pay for Tourism Eco-Compensation in Danxiashan National Geopark. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plummer, M.L. Assessing benefit transfer for the valuation of ecosystem services. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binder, S.; Haight, R.G.; Polasky, S.; Warziniack, T.; Mockrin, M.H.; Deal, R.L.; Arthaud, G. Assessment and Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services: State of the Science Review; Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-170; US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: Newtown Square, PA, USA, 2017; 47p.
- Selivanov, E.; Hlaváčková, P. Methods for monetary valuation of ecosystem services: A scoping review. J. For. Sci. 2021, 67, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]











| Data Type | Data Source | Resolution | Processing | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nature factors | Elevation | www.resdc.cn (2000, 2010, 2023), accessed on 10 December 2025 | 30 m | 3D Analyst Tools, Raster Surface, Aspect and Slope by ArcGIS 10.8. |
| Slope | ||||
| Aspect | ||||
| Temperature | www.resdc.cn (2000, 2010, 2023), accessed on 10 December 2025 | 1000 m | Extraction and clipping by ArcGIS 10.8. | |
| Precipitation | 1000 m | |||
| Index (NDVI) | 30 m | |||
| Human factors | Product (GDP) | https://github.com/thestarlab/ChinaGDP (2000, 2010, 2023), accessed on 10 December 2025 | 1000 m | |
| Population | https://hub.worldpop.org/geodata/listing?id=135 (2000, 2010, 2023), accessed on 10 December 2025 | 100 m | ||
| Land use data | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5816591 (2000, 2010, 2023), accessed on 10 December 2025 | 30 m | ||
| Statistic data | socioeconomic data | Shanxi statistical yearbook (2010, 2023) And CSMAR database (2000) (https://data.csmar.com/), accessed on 12 December 2025 | County Scale | For Ecological Compensation Calculation |
| Grain Crop Production Data | China Agricultural Product Price Survey Yearbook (2000, 2010, 2023). | Provincial Scale | For ESV Equivalent Estimation | |
| Primary Category | Secondary Category | Farmland (FaL) | Forest Land (FoL) | Grassland (GL) | Water Land (WL) | Construction Land (CL) | Unused Land (UL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provisioning Services | Food Production | 984.87 | 292.56 | 270.36 | 758.93 | 0 | 11.59 |
| Raw Material Supply | 1575.79 | 672.03 | 397.81 | 422.91 | 0 | 34.76 | |
| Water Supply | 23.17 | 347.6 | 220.15 | 6303.15 | 0 | 23.17 | |
| Regulating Services | Gas Regulation | 776.31 | 2210.16 | 1398.12 | 1546.82 | 0 | 127.45 |
| Climate Regulation | 417.12 | 6613.09 | 3696.15 | 3412.27 | 0 | 115.87 | |
| Environmental Purification | 115.87 | 1937.87 | 1220.46 | 5300.9 | 0 | 359.19 | |
| Hydrological Regulation | 312.84 | 4327.62 | 2707.42 | 73,268.3 | 0 | 243.32 | |
| Supporting Services | Soil Conservation | 1193.43 | 2691 | 1703.24 | 1877.04 | 0 | 150.63 |
| Nutrient Cycling | 139.04 | 205.66 | 131.32 | 144.83 | 0 | 11.59 | |
| Biodiversity Maintenance | 150.63 | 2450.58 | 1548.75 | 6036.65 | 0 | 139.04 | |
| Cultural Services | Esthetic Landscape | 69.52 | 1074.66 | 683.61 | 3835.19 | 0 | 57.93 |
| Total | 5758.57 | 22,822.84 | 13,977.39 | 102,907.00 | 0 | 1274.53 |
| Year | Variables | Unstandardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | t | Significance | Correlation | R2 | Adjusted R2 | F-Statistic (Sig.) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Standard Error | Beta | Zero-Order | |||||||
| 2000 | (Constant) | 25,217,925.328 | 1,313,841.448 | 19.194 | 0.000 ** | 0.124 | 0.108 | 6.521 (0.001 **) | ||
| X1 | −68,066.094 | 203,406.090 | −0.006 | −0.335 | 0.738 | −0.010 | ||||
| X2 | 136,001.951 | 181,896.642 | 0.012 | 0.748 | 0.455 | 0.008 | ||||
| X3 | −134,801.838 | 128,237.907 | −0.014 | −1.051 | 0.293 | −0.014 | ||||
| X4 | 741,044.176 | 154,517.356 | 0.067 | 4.796 | 0.000 ** | 0.050 | ||||
| X5 | 611,513.290 | 177,912.145 | 0.058 | 3.437 | 0.001 ** | 0.080 | ||||
| X6 | 169,899.981 | 171,090.613 | 0.015 | 0.993 | 0.321 | 0.010 | ||||
| X7 | −82,580.669 | 328,706.799 | −0.004 | −0.251 | 0.802 | 0.002 | ||||
| X8 | −1,069,469.717 | 367,847.751 | −0.050 | −2.907 | 0.004 ** | 0.070 | ||||
| 2010 | (Constant) | 29,083,476.176 | 694,641.686 | 41.868 | 0.000 ** | 0.206 | 0.202 | 15.213 (0.000 **) | ||
| X1 | 60,858.674 | 108,862.482 | 0.006 | 0.559 | 0.576 | −0.025 | ||||
| X2 | 239,059.338 | 99,464.976 | 0.022 | 2.403 | 0.016 * | 0.002 | ||||
| X3 | −34,985.899 | 70,289.263 | −0.004 | −0.498 | 0.619 | −0.003 | ||||
| X4 | 104,891.669 | 84,007.611 | 0.030 | 1.249 | 0.012 * | 0.009 | ||||
| X5 | 987,493.502 | 90,937.288 | 0.099 | 10.859 | 0.000 ** | 0.082 | ||||
| X6 | 494,005.081 | 93,377.288 | 0.046 | 5.290 | 0.000 ** | 0.045 | ||||
| X7 | −137,591.181 | 172,771.775 | −0.007 | −0.796 | 0.426 | 0.008 | ||||
| X8 | −473,829.999 | 112,628.344 | −0.037 | −4.207 | 0.000 ** | −0.002 | ||||
| 2023 | (Constant) | 31,885,775.047 | 1,775,749.575 | 17.956 | 0.000 ** | 0.294 | 0.290 | 18.046 (0.000 **) | ||
| X1 | 1,049,964.641 | 259,360.535 | 0.106 | 4.048 | 0.000 ** | −0.060 | ||||
| X2 | 582,615.391 | 156,399.149 | 0.059 | 3.725 | 0.000 ** | 0.011 | ||||
| X3 | −133,723.110 | 108,702.661 | −0.016 | −1.230 | 0.219 | −0.008 | ||||
| X4 | 1,053,576.966 | 155,447.523 | 0.014 | 6.778 | 0.075 | 0.148 | ||||
| X5 | 1,704,815.644 | 230,972.991 | 0.187 | 7.381 | 0.000 ** | 0.126 | ||||
| X6 | 1,039,465.474 | 157,409.686 | 0.105 | 6.604 | 0.000 ** | 0.143 | ||||
| X7 | −1,593,007.682 | 294,230.999 | −0.086 | −5.414 | 0.000 ** | −0.051 | ||||
| X8 | −167,980.973 | 742,652.635 | −0.003 | −0.226 | 0.067 | −0.022 | ||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Li, X.; Mao, S.; Liu, Z.; Li, X.; Liu, Z.; Li, J. Ecological and Economic Sustainability in Resource-Based Cities: A Case Study of Ecosystem Services, Drivers, and Compensation Strategies in Xinzhou, China. Land 2026, 15, 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15020334
Li X, Mao S, Liu Z, Li X, Liu Z, Li J. Ecological and Economic Sustainability in Resource-Based Cities: A Case Study of Ecosystem Services, Drivers, and Compensation Strategies in Xinzhou, China. Land. 2026; 15(2):334. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15020334
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Xiaodan, Shuai Mao, Zhen Liu, Xiaosai Li, Zhiping Liu, and Jing Li. 2026. "Ecological and Economic Sustainability in Resource-Based Cities: A Case Study of Ecosystem Services, Drivers, and Compensation Strategies in Xinzhou, China" Land 15, no. 2: 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15020334
APA StyleLi, X., Mao, S., Liu, Z., Li, X., Liu, Z., & Li, J. (2026). Ecological and Economic Sustainability in Resource-Based Cities: A Case Study of Ecosystem Services, Drivers, and Compensation Strategies in Xinzhou, China. Land, 15(2), 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15020334

