Next Article in Journal
Mobile Applications as a Tool for Tourism Management in Geoparks (Case Study: Potential Geopark Małopolski Przełom Wisły, E Poland)
Previous Article in Journal
Innovative Land Bank Models for Addressing Vacant Properties in Japan: A Case Study of Six Approaches
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Urban Park Construction Period on Plant Multidimensional Diversities, Landscape Patterns of Green Spaces, and Their Associations in Changchun City, Northeast China

1
College of Landscape Architecture, Changchun University, Changchun 130022, China
2
Shaanxi Provincial Land Engineering Construction Group Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710075, China
3
Changchun Academy of Forestry Sciences, Bureau of Forestry and Landscaping of Changchun, Changchun 130117, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2025, 14(4), 675; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14040675
Submission received: 5 February 2025 / Revised: 17 March 2025 / Accepted: 19 March 2025 / Published: 22 March 2025

Abstract

:
Understanding the characteristics of urban plant multidimensional diversity and urban green spaces (UGSs) landscape patterns is the central theme of urban ecology, providing theoretical support for UGSs management and biodiversity conservation. Taking Changchun, a provincial city, as an example, a total of 240 plots were surveyed using the stratified random sampling method. We studied the effects of the urban park construction period on plant multidimensional diversities, landscape patterns of green spaces, and their associations in Changchun City, Northeast China. The results indicated that total woody species and tree species diversity attributes were both the highest in the construction period of 2001–2020 and lowest in the construction period before 1940. However, shrub species diversity attributes were completely the opposite. Diameter at the breast height (DBH) diversity index (Hd) was the highest in the construction period before 1940 and lowest in the construction period of 2001–2020. However, the height diversity index (Hh) showed the opposite trend. Phylogenetic structures of total woody species and tree species showed divergent patterns in parks constructed before 1940 and 1940–2000 period, while that in 2001–2020 period could not be determined. In contrast, the phylogenetic structure of the shrub species clustered across all construction periods. Landscape pattern metrics varied significantly among different construction periods. Total Area (TA) was the highest in the construction period of 2001–2020. The structural equation model (SEM) revealed that construction periods exerted significant direct effects on both multidimensional diversities and landscape patterns of green spaces. Specifically, construction periods indirectly affected tree species diversity through structural diversity and influenced shrub species’ phylogenetic diversity through shrub species diversity. What is more, Patch Density (PD), Edge Density (ED), and Aggregation Index (AI) correlated with Hh, which had a direct effect on the Shannon–Wiener diversity index of tree species (H′t). Overall, the results indicated that species diversity can be enhanced through regulating landscape patterns, rationally selecting tree species, and optimizing plant configuration. These above results can provide scientific references for the configuration of plant communities and selection of tree species in urban parks, and offer important guidance for urban biodiversity conservation and enhancement.

1. Introduction

Humanity’s relentless demand for the Earth’s resources is accelerating the rate of species extinction, disrupting the global ecological balance and leading to continued loss of biodiversity [1,2]. For example, in the tropical regions, where biodiversity is rich, 32 million hectares of primary or recovering forests were lost between 2010 and 2015 [1]. The Earth may experience an extinction, with an estimated 20–50% of animal species facing extinction [3]. Biodiversity holds significant value, including consumptive use value, productive use value, social value, ethical value, esthetic value, option value, and ecosystem service value [4]. As a result, a decline in biodiversity can lead to a series of problems, such as threats to food security, economic losses, loss of cultural values, the breaking of ecological balance, and a decline in human well-being. Therefore, the protection of biodiversity is essential for maintaining the balance of ecosystems and the long-term prosperity of human societies.
Urban green spaces (UGSs) are an important part of the urban ecosystem, which have the functions of soil and water conservation, climate regulation, air purification, environmental protection and beautification, and the protection of biological resources [5,6,7]. With the acceleration of urbanization, habitats of many plants and animals have been replaced by impervious surface areas [8]. Therefore, UGSs are assuming an increasingly critical role in the conservation and maintenance of biodiversity. A large number of studies have mainly focused on the assessment of tree species composition and diversity [8], which is essential to protecting the biodiversity of forests [9]. In addition, some studies have suggested that the effects of tree species diversity may be partly attributed to structural diversity [10,11,12,13,14,15]; Wang et al. considered that large plants and the top 50% of the tallest trees contribute to enhancing the carbon sequestration capacity of UGSs [16]. Notably, the structural diversity of UGSs is not static in space and time, and it is often altered by human interference, such as different planning and management, human outdoor activities, and land use [17]. Unlike species diversity, phylogenetic diversity takes into account the evolutionary history of species. Li et al. considered that phylogenetic structure has an important reference value for biodiversity conservation [18]. What is more, previous studies have shown that combining species diversity with phylogenetic diversity can more accurately reflect changes in community biodiversity and the mechanisms of community assembly [19]. Therefore, integrating phylogenetic diversity with studies on species diversity and structural diversity can reveal the ecological functions and evolutionary potential of biodiversity from multidimensional perspectives [20]. Landscape pattern refers to the spatial arrangement and composition of different elements within the landscape, which is a specific expression of landscape heterogeneity, and, at the same time, is the result of the effects of various ecological processes at different scales [21]. Previous studies have shown that the regulation and construction of sustainable landscape patterns is a possible way to improve biodiversity [22], and landscape characteristics can also be used as an index to measure biodiversity [23,24,25]. With the rapid development of urbanization and the increase in urban population density, the proportion of UGSs has been changing [26], which changes the urban forest landscape patterns [27]. However, most of the previous studies have focused on landscape patterns and their driving factors [28]. In UGSs studies, most focused on the impact of socioeconomic factors on species diversity [29], while comprehensive research on landscape patterns and multidimensional diversities is scarce.
As the main component of the UGSs, urban parks are important resources that are different from other types of UGSs [30]. Urban parks have a large green area and rich species composition, and perform ecological functions such as habitat provision for plants and animals, and biodiversity conservation. With the continuous development of cities, the status and role of parks in the city are becoming increasingly significant, and the connection between urban public space and social life is also strengthening. In addition, urban parks have become a comprehensive reflection of politics, economy and culture [31]. There are many parks in the city, and the parks constructed in different periods have significant differences. They have experienced different historical evolutions, have different design concepts, have different service facilities, and play different social functions. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the multidimensional diversities and landscape patterns of urban parks constructed in different periods.
During the Puppet Manchukuo period, Changchun was designated as “Xinjing”. Since the reform and opening-up era, Changchun has gradually developed into a major national industrial base and transportation hub. In recent decades, urban population and urban impervious areas have accelerated swiftly [32,33]. As the geographical center of Northeast Asia, Changchun continues to write a new chapter in its development with the vision of an ecologically livable “Forest City”. Given its historical trajectory, Changchun’s Park planning and construction have been shaped by distinct developmental stages. The study aimed to achieve the following objectives: (1) determine whether species diversity, structural diversity, and phylogenetic diversity are significantly different in the parks constructed during different periods; (2) determine whether green space landscape patterns are significantly different in urban parks constructed during different periods; (3) explore the associations among multidimensional diversities, landscape patterns, and park construction periods.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study area is located in Changchun, the provincial capital of Northeast China’s Jilin Province, which is also known as “Spring City of the North”. Changchun has a continental monsoon climate in the northern temperate zone, with four distinct seasons: windy spring, rainy summer, cool autumn, and cold and long winter. The annual minimum temperature is −39.8 °C, the maximum temperature is 39.5 °C, and the average temperature is 4.8 °C. The annual average precipitation is 567 mm [34]. The precipitation is mainly concentrated in July and August. Changchun is bordered Songyuan City, Siping City, Jilin City, and Harbin City. The study area is located within the ring expressway of Changchun City (Figure 1b), with a land area of 524 square kilometers (125°07′–125°26′ E, 43°44′–44°02′ N) [35].

2.2. Field Survey

In this research, the stratified random sampling method was used to determine the number of sample plots, and a total of 240 plots from 29 parks were investigated. According to the construction period of the parks, 240 plots were divided into three categories (Table 1): the construction period before 1940, the construction period of 1940–2000 and the construction period of 2001–2020, with the number of plots being 90, 52 and 98, respectively, and the size of the plot was 20 m × 20 m. The species name, species richness, the abundance of each species, tree DBH (the diameter at breast height), tree height, crown width and health status of the woody plants in each plot were recorded.

2.3. Calculation of Species Diversity Indices

Species diversity indices serve as core indicators of the health and stability of an ecosystem. The Species Richness (SR), Margalef richness index (dMa), Shannon–Wiener diversity index (H′) and Pielou Evenness index (J′) of each sample plot were calculated by using the data of field investigation. The calculation formulas for the indices are as follows (Equations (1)–(4)).
Species Richness: SR = S
Margalef   richness   index :   d M a = ( S 1 ) / l n N
Shannon Wiener   diversity   index :   H = i = 1 S R A i l n R A i
Pielou   Evenness   index :   J = H / l n ( S )
In the above formulas, S represents the Species Richness; N represents the sum of the individuals of all species; RAi represents the relative abundance of species i [35]. In this study, SRw, SRt and SRs represent the Species Richness of woody plants, trees, and shrubs; dMaw, dMat and dMas represent Margalef richness indices of woody plants, trees, and shrubs; H′w, H′t and H′s represent Shannon–Wiener diversity indices of woody plants, trees, and shrubs; J′w, J′t and J′s represent Pielou Evenness indices of woody plants, trees, and shrubs.

2.4. Calculation of Structural Diversity Indices

Structural diversity was classified into horizontal and vertical components, which are represented by the DBH structural diversity index and tree height structural diversity index, respectively. The value of the DBH structural diversity index (Hd) reflects the community age structure [36]. A higher tree height structural diversity index (Hh) indicates that the community has a multi-layered structure, forming complex vertical niches [20]. According to the field survey data, the tree DBH was divided into 6 levels, which were 0~10.00 cm, 10.01~20.00 cm, 20.01~30.00 cm, 30.01~40.00 cm, 40.01~50.00 cm, and >50.00 cm. The tree height was divided into 4 levels, which were 0~4.99 m, 5.00~9.99 m, 10.00~15.00 m, and >15.00 m. Hd and Hh of each plot were calculated. The formulas are as follows (Equations (5) and (6)).
DBH   diversity   index :   H d = j = 1 d P j ln P j
Height   diversity   index :   H h = k = 1 h P k ln P k
Pj represents the ratio of the DBH area of grade j, and Pk represents the ratio of the DBH area of height grade k, respectively [37].

2.5. Calculation of Phylogenetic Diversity Indices

Phylogenetic diversity reflects the phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary distances among species. Three phylogenetic diversity indices were calculated, and they were Faith’s phylogenetic diversity index (PD), net relatedness index (NRI) and net nearest taxon index (NTI), respectively. A larger PD indicates that species are more distantly related phylogenetically. Positive values of NRI and NTI suggest clustered phylogenetic structures, whereas negative values indicate overdispersed structures [20]. NRI focuses on measuring phylogenetic similarity among species, while smaller NTI values indicate closer evolutionary relationships [38,39]. The formulas are as follows (Equations (7)–(11)).
P D = j = 1 m l e n g t h i
M P D = n k n k δ mn k ,   m n
N R I = 1 × ( M P D s M P D r ) / S D ( M P D r )
M N T D = n k min δ mn k ,   m n
N T I = 1 × ( M N T D s M N T D r ) / S D ( M N T D r )
where m is the number of species within the plot, and lengthi denotes the branch length of species i in the phylogenetic tree. k represents Species Richness; δmn represents the phylogenetic distance between species m and n; minδmn represents the minimum phylogenetic distance between species m and all other species within the community. MPDs and MNTDs are the observed values of each plot. MPDr and MNTDr are the average of MPD and MNTD from the null model (999 randomizations), and SD is the standard deviation [20,40]. In our study, PDw, PDt and PDs represent Faith’s phylogenetic diversity indices of woody plants, trees and shrubs; NRIw, NRIt and NRIs represent net relatedness indices of woody plants, trees and shrubs; NTIw, NTIt and NTIs represent net nearest taxon indices of woody plants, trees and shrubs.

2.6. Analysis of UGSs Landscape Patterns

The landscape patterns of green spaces of 29 parks were mapped using Google Earth images. A series of landscape pattern metrics were calculated in the software of FRAGSTATS (version 4.2). According to the characteristics of landscape pattern metrics, the following metrics were selected for this study: area-edge metrics (TA, AREA-MN and ED), shape metrics (PARA-MN, SHAPE-MN and CONTIG-MN) and aggregation metrics (PD, AI, DIVISION and COHESION) [35,41,42,43].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

One-way ANOVA and non-parametric tests were used in SPSS 27.0 to verify whether there were significant differences in species diversity attributes (SRw, SRt, SRs, dMaw, dMat, dMas, H′w, H′t, H′s, J′w, J′t, and J′s), structural diversity attributes (Hd and Hh), phylogenetic diversity attributes (PDw, PDt, PDs, NRIw, NRIt, NRIs, NTIw, NTIt, and NTIs) and landscape pattern metrics (TA, AREA-MN, ED, PARA-MN, SHAPE-MN, CONTIG-MN, PD, AI, DIVISION, and COHESION) in urban parks across different construction periods. The lavaan package in RStudio (version 4.3.3) was used to establish a structural equation model (SEM) to determine the relationships and effects among complex variables [44].

3. Results

3.1. Species Composition

We investigated 7689 plants, which belonged to 25 families, 56 genera, and 116 species (Table 2). Among them, 6723 trees belonged to 21 families, 39 genera, and 90 species, and 966 shrubs belonged to 13 families, 27 genera, and 38 species. Tree species in urban parks constructed before 1940 contained 20 families, 34 genera, and 62 species. In the construction period of 1940–2000, tree species belonged to 20 families, 35 genera, and 64 species. And tree species belonged to 17 families, 33 genera, and 73 species in the construction period of 2001–2020. Shrub species in urban parks constructed before 1940 contained 11 families, 20 genera and 24 species. In the construction period of 1940–2000, shrub species belonged to 9 families, 19 genera, and 23 species. And shrub species belonged to 9 families, 19 genera and 25 species in the construction period of 2001–2020. The top three most common woody plant species in different construction periods of urban parks in Changchun city are shown in Table 3.

3.2. Multidimensional Diversity Attributes of Urban Parks Across Different Construction Periods

There were significant differences in species diversity attributes, structural diversity attributes, and phylogenetic diversity attributes in different construction periods of urban parks. For total woody and tree species diversity (Figure 2), SRw, dMaw, H′w, J′w, SRt, dMat, H′t, and J′t were all the highest in the construction period of 2001–2020 and lowest in the construction period before 1940. From before the 1940 construction period to the 2001–2020 construction period, SRw, dMaw, H′w, J′w, SRt, dMat, H′t, and J′t increased by 13.42%, 17.62%, 17.33%, 12.74%, 38.04%, 44.92%, 40.84%, and 25.24%, respectively. In contrast, shrub species diversity (Figure 2) followed an opposite trend. SRs, dMas, H′s, and J′s were all the highest in the construction period before 1940 and lowest in the construction period of 2001–2020. From before 1940 construction period to 2001–2020 construction period, SRs, dMas, H′s, and J′s decreased by 53.30%, 61.19%, 60.57%, and 61.02%, respectively.
For structural diversity attributes (Figure 3), Hd was the highest in parks constructed before 1940 and lowest in those constructed during 2001–2020, and there were significant differences between before 1940 and 2001–2020 period, and also between 1940 and 2000 and 2001–2020 period (p < 0.05). Hh was the highest in the construction period of 2001–2020 and lowest in the construction period before 1940, and there were significant differences between before 1940 and 2001–2020 period (p < 0.05).
Regarding phylogenetic diversity (Figure 4), NTIw, NRIW, NTIt, and NRIt in the construction period of 1940–2000 and before 1940 were all negative. In the construction period of 2001–2020, NTIw, NTIt were positive, and NRIw, NRIt were negative. For shrub species phylogenetic diversity attributes, NRIs and NTIs were all positive in different construction periods. PDw was the highest in the construction period of 2001–2020 and lowest in the construction period of 1940–2000, and there was no significant difference among construction periods (p > 0.05). PDt was the highest in the construction period of 2001–2020 and lowest in the construction period before 1940, and there was also no significant difference among construction periods (p > 0.05). PDs was the highest in the construction period before 1940 and lowest in the construction period of 2001–2020, and there were significant differences between before 1940 and 1940–2000 period, and also between before 1940 and 2001–2020 period (p < 0.05).

3.3. Landscape Pattern Metrics of Urban Parks Across Different Construction Periods

As shown in Figure 5, landscape patterns analysis demonstrated significant differences in urban parks across different construction periods (p < 0.05). TA was the highest in the construction period of 2001–2020 and lowest in the construction period of 1940–2000 (Figure 5a), and the construction periods before 1940 and 1940–2000 showed significant differences (p < 0.05), while the 2001–2020 period also demonstrated significant differences compared to the 1940–2000 period (p < 0.05). ED was the highest in the construction period of 1940–2000 and lowest in the construction period before 1940 (Figure 5b), and significant differences were found among all construction periods (p < 0.05). AREA-MN was the highest in the construction period before 1940 and lowest in the construction period of 1940–2000 (Figure 5c), and significant differences were also found among all construction periods (p < 0.05). In addition, CONTIG-MN (Figure 5d), SHAPE-MN (Figure 5e), and PARA-MN (Figure 5f) were significantly different among all construction periods (p < 0.05). COHESION and AI were the highest in the construction period before 1940 and lowest in the construction period of 1940–2000 (Figure 5g,j), and there were significant differences between before 1940 and the 1940–2000 period, and also between before 1940 and 2001–2020 period (p < 0.05). DIVISION was the highest in the construction period before 1940 and lowest in the construction period of 2001–2020 (Figure 5h), and there were significant differences between before 1940 and 1940–2000 period, and also between before 1940 and 2001–2020 period (p < 0.05). PD was the highest in the construction period of 1940–2000 and lowest in the construction period before 1940 (Figure 5i), and significant differences were found among all construction periods (p < 0.05).

3.4. Associations Among Construction Period, Multidimensional Diversities and Landscape Patterns: Decoupling by SEM

Model fit was evaluated using indices including df (35), GFI (0.956), CFI (0.981), RMSEA (0.057), and srmr (0.077). Structural equation model (SEM) indicated that construction periods had significant effects on woody species diversity (−0.14, p < 0.05), tree species diversity (−0.24, p < 0.001), shrub species diversity (0.22, p < 0.01), woody species phylogenetic diversity (−0.19, p < 0.01), tree species phylogenetic diversity (−0.14, p < 0.05), shrub species phylogenetic diversity (0.02, p > 0.05), structural diversity (−0.20, p < 0.01) and landscape patterns (−0.27, p < 0.001) (Figure 6). As shown in Table 4, construction periods had an indirect effect on tree species diversity through structural diversity (−0.2 × 0.04 = −0.008, p < 0.05). Construction periods indirectly affected shrub species phylogenetic diversity through shrub species diversity (0.22 × 0.21 = 0.0462, p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a significant correlation between woody species diversity and tree species diversity (0.72, p < 0.001), tree species phylogenetic diversity correlated well with woody species phylogenetic diversity (−0.15, p < 0.05), and tree species diversity was related to tree species phylogenetic diversity (0.85, p < 0.001). Landscape patterns also correlated with structural diversity (0.06, p > 0.05), and structural diversity had a direct effect on tree species diversity.

4. Discussion

4.1. Effects of Construction Period of Urban Parks on Woody Plant Multidimensional Diversities

Comprehensive studies on species diversity, structural diversity, and phylogenetic diversity can offer foundational theoretical guidance for biodiversity conservation in urban parks. The results confirmed that there were significant differences in species diversities of woody plants, trees, and shrubs across different construction periods (Figure 2). Previous studies have shown that habitat age was related to plant diversity. In Zhanjiang, the earlier the construction period, the higher the cultivated species richness. Additionally, there is a positive correlation between spontaneous species richness and construction age [45,46]. However, our study found that the later the construction period, the higher the diversity attributes of total woody species and tree species. It may be due to more elaborate planning and more adequate financial support [47]. Alien species introduced by human activities may further increase urban species diversity [31]. Moreover, accelerated urbanization [48] might also contribute to higher species diversity of total woody species and tree species, as people’s changing lifestyles and values result in higher SR and dMa. Our results also indicated that H′t and H′s had significant differences across different construction periods, which can be ascribed to urban management policies, such as fertilization and watering frequency [35,45,49]. Wang et al. [50] suggested that there were no significant differences in the Pielou Evenness index among vegetation types across different restoration years. Figure 2 showed that J′w, J′t, and J′s had significant differences across different construction periods, which indicated that the numbers of total woody species, tree species, and shrub species in urban parks varied with construction periods. J′w and J′t were the lowest during the construction period before 1940 since the forest stand types of urban parks constructed before 1940 were predominantly mature pure stands. Wang et al. [51] considered that, compared with trees, shrubs contribute relatively less to UGSs, but they also play an indispensable role in UGSs. In our study, the earlier the construction period, the higher the SRs, dMas, H′s, and J′s. This is because “old” parks were constructed earlier, and the forest stand types in these early-constructed parks were mainly single-tree-species; landscape management departments replanted shrubs to enhance the vertical structure of plant communities. In contrast, newly constructed parks paid more attention to the multi-layered combination of arbor tree species, resulting in a lower variety of shrub species.
Structural diversity indices exhibited significant differences among parks of different construction periods. Our research indicated that Hd was the highest in the construction period before 1940 (Figure 3a). Park management departments adopted reasonable renewal methods based on the growth of old tree species. For areas that needed to increase the greenery coverage or improve the ecological environment, supplementary planting or dense planting was carried out. Therefore, the age structure of trees was more diverse and Hd increased during the construction period before 1940. Hh was the highest in the construction period of 2001–2020 (Figure 3b), and tree species diversity was also the highest in this construction period (Figure 2), which may be because of the rational selection of species and plant allocation in urban parks. In line with the principle of year-round seasonal diversity, flowering and fruit-bearing small arbor species were strategically combined in the planting design.
Our results indicated that the phylogenetic relationship of total woody species and tree species was the most distant in the construction period of 2001–2020 (Figure 4), and total woody species and tree species diversity attributes were also the highest in this construction period (Figure 2). The phylogenetic relationship of total woody species and tree species was the closest in the construction period of 1940–2000 and before 1940, respectively. In addition, the phylogenetic relationship of shrub species was the most distant in the construction period before 1940, and shrub species diversity attributes were also the highest in this construction period. The phylogenetic relationship of shrub species was the closest in the construction period of 2001–2020, and shrub species diversity attributes were also the lowest in this construction period. These results suggested that the greater the phylogenetic distance among species, the higher the species diversity attributes, which is consistent with previous studies [52]. NRIw, NRIt, NTIw, and NTIt demonstrated that there were woody species and tree species phylogenetic dispersion in the construction periods of 1940–2000 and before 1940, which indicated that the phylogenetic structure was over dispersed. NRIs and NTIs indicated that there were cases of shrub species phylogenetic clustering in all the construction periods, which indicated that phylogenetic structure was clustered. Phylogenetic diversity can reflect plant functional traits; when the phylogenetic relationship between plant species is close, it is likely that their functional traits will be similar [53]. Previous studies have shown that correlations between leaf traits of shrubs were significantly stronger than those of trees [54]. This finding is consistent with our research. Our results underscored that the phylogenetic structure of shrubs was more clustered than that of trees.

4.2. Effects of Construction Period of Urban Parks on Landscape Pattern Metrics

Landscape pattern metrics were significantly different in urban parks across different construction periods (Figure 5). TA in urban parks constructed during 2001–2020 was significantly higher than in other construction periods. On the one hand, the ever-increasing demands of the people have led to rapid urbanization, and the citizens’ demand for public places to rest, exercise, and socialize has risen rapidly. This has promoted the rapid growth of UGSs and driven the construction of parks [55]. On the other hand, the Chinese government has rolled out a series of policies to strengthen ecological environment construction and biodiversity protection, such as ecological civilization construction, land and spatial greening initiatives, and “Forest City” development [56,57]. ED was the highest in urban parks constructed during 1940–2000, which demonstrated that parks constructed in this period were subjected to more human interference. Parks constructed in the construction period of 1940–2000 had the lowest AREA-MN, COHESION, and AI and the highest PD. Consequently, they not only need to expand the area of green patches, but also establish corridors between green patches [34] and improve the degree of patch aggregation. AREA-MN was the highest in the construction period before 1940. This is because the construction of “old” parks featured a large-scale spatial layout, with a large area of continuous green space reserved, resulting in the formation of giant patches. Moreover, “old” parks might have focused on natural conservation, with fewer artificial facilities and functional partitions, thus avoiding the fragmentation of patches. DIVISION was the highest in the construction period before 1940, and it may be due to various design concepts of urban parks and urbanization intensity [58]. This could lead to habitat fragmentation and reduce the available survival spaces of animals and plants [59]. Therefore, we suggested that enhancing the integrity of landscapes in parks constructed before 1940 is essential.

4.3. Associations Among Construction Period, Multidimensional Diversity Attributes and Landscape Patterns Decoupling by SEM

Analysis of species diversity, structural diversity, landscape patterns and construction periods can provide scientific guidance for enhancing species diversity. Our results provided evidence that different construction periods had significant effects on species diversity, structural diversity, phylogenetic diversity, and landscape patterns (Figure 6). SEM indicated that the later construction period corresponded to higher indices of woody species diversity, tree species diversity, woody species phylogenetic diversity, tree species phylogenetic diversity, and structural diversity, while landscape pattern was also significantly affected by the construction period. In the study of typical mixed broadleaved-Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) forests, it has been found that the species diversity indices would be higher with a more complex community structure [60], which is consistent with our research results; our results showed that structural diversity (Hh) affected tree species diversity (H′t) positively. It may be because the higher the structural diversity indices are, trees and other plants can utilize spatial resources more effectively, thus improving the species diversity of the community [11,61,62,63]. What is more, UGSs are places for people to relax and enjoy leisure time, especially for the elderly and children, and the increase in vegetation coverage and biodiversity can reduce the occurrence of negative emotions [59,64,65]. Regarding species diversity and phylogenetic diversity, our results suggested that tree species diversity (H′t) was significantly correlated with tree species phylogenetic diversity (PDt). In addition, shrub species diversity (SRs, J′s) affected shrub species phylogenetic diversity (NRIs) positively, which demonstrated that species diversity was positively correlated with phylogenetic distance. This result is likely due to the fact that with the increase in species diversity, different species occupy different ecological niches, thereby increasing the branches of the phylogenetic tree, resulting in the dispersal of phylogenetic structure [19]. In addition, our results indicated that the lower the patch aggregation, the greater the fragmentation, and the more complex the patch shape of green spaces in urban parks, the higher the Hh and H′t. This is because complex patch shapes and fragmented patches create more diverse habitats, providing living spaces for tree species with different ecological niches. Additionally, decentralized small green spaces may be designed as diverse plant communities (e.g., themed areas with distinct compositions). This phenomenon suggests that under specific urban park management contexts, moderate landscape fragmentation and complex patch shapes can enhance Hh and species diversity (H′t) by increasing habitat heterogeneity and balancing competitive relationships. Consequently, Hh can be enhanced by moderately increasing landscape fragmentation and patch shape complexity while reducing green space patch aggregation in urban parks, thus improving the species diversity of trees.

5. Conclusions

The construction periods of urban parks have significant impacts on the species diversity, structural diversity, and phylogenetic diversity of woody plants, trees, and shrubs, as well as the landscape pattern of green spaces. Later construction periods correlate with higher woody and tree species diversity but lower shrub species diversity. Earlier construction periods are associated with higher Hd and lower Hh. Furthermore, higher phylogenetic diversity corresponds to higher species diversity. Landscape patterns (PD, ED, and AI) also correlate with structural diversity (Hh). Based on these findings, recommendations are proposed for urban parks in Changchun City and other urban parks with similar characteristics:
(1)
For “old” parks constructed before 1940, supplementary planting of small-diameter tree species is recommended to enhance species diversity while enriching the vertical layers of plant communities. For “new” parks constructed in the 2001–2020 period, reducing human intervention in shrub management combined with targeted replanting to increase shrub species diversity is suggested, and the management should replant medium-diameter trees to optimize the horizontal structure of plant communities.
(2)
From the perspective of multidimensional diversities, planting species with distant phylogenetic relationships to enhance species diversity is recommended. Additionally, increasing the Hh of communities can not only improve the species diversity of trees but also enhance the species diversity of woody plants.
(3)
Regulating landscape patterns can enhance both species diversity and structural diversity. Rational design of patch layout in green spaces of urban parks (e.g., decentralization, diverse shapes) may be more beneficial for biodiversity conservation than traditional centralized green spaces. This conclusion provides a novel insight into UGSs planning.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Y.; writing—review and editing, D.Z.; funding acquisition, D.Z; data curation, X.Y., Y.S., X.M., Z.L., H.Z., X.Z. and Y.C.; visualization, X.Y.; investigation, X.Y., Y.S., X.M., Z.L., Y.C. and Y.W.; revision of the article, D.Z.; supervision, D.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Jilin province (20230101232JC).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank X.Z., J.W., Z.W., T.W., Y.Y. and Y.Y. for their dedication to our fieldwork campaigns.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Y.C. was employed by Shaanxi Provincial Land Engineering Construction Group Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bongaarts, J. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Popul. Dev. Rev. 2019, 45, 680–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Weiskopf, S.R.; Lerman, S.B.; Isbell, F.; Morelli, T.L. Biodiversity promotes urban ecosystem functioning. Ecography 2024, 2024, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kaiho, K. Extinction magnitude of animals in the near future. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Panday, M.K.; Mittal, P.; Mehrotra, M.; Agarwal, M.B. Environmental Evolution: The Process of Ecological Changes in India; SAAR Publications: Agra, India, 2024; pp. 17–38. [Google Scholar]
  5. Xu, P. Avian Communities in Zijin Mountain Urban Forest of Nanjing City. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  6. Li, X.M.; Zhou, W.Q.; Ouyang, Z.Y. Relationship between land surface temperature and spatial pattern of greenspace: What are the effects of spatial resolution? Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 114, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ren, Z.B.; He, X.Y.; Zheng, H.F.; Zhang, D.; Yu, X.Y.; Shen, G.Q.; Guo, R.C. Estimation of the Relationship between Urban Park Characteristics and Park Cool Island Intensity by Remote Sensing Data and Field Measurement. Forests 2013, 4, 868–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ma, Z.J.; Zhang, P.; Hu, N.L.; Wang, G.D.; Dong, Y.L.; Guo, Y.J.; Wang, C.C.; Fu, Y.; Ren, Z.B. Understanding the drivers of woody plant diversity in urban parks in a snow climate city of China. J. For. Res. 2023, 34, 1021–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Paul, A.M.; Alfred, J. Tree Species Diversity in Makurdi Zoological Garden, Benue State, Nigeria. UMYU Sci. 2024, 3, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ryan, M.G.; Stape, J.L.; Binkley, D.; Fonseca, S.; Loos, R.A.; Takahashi, E.N.; Silva, C.R.; Silva, S.R.; Hakamada, R.E.; Ferreira, J.M.; et al. Factors controlling Eucalyptus productivity: How water availability and stand structure alter production and carbon allocation. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 259, 1695–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hardiman, B.S.; Bohrer, G.; Gough, C.M.; Vogel, C.S.; Curtis, P.S. The role of canopy structural complexity in wood net primary production of a maturing northern deciduous forest. Ecology 2011, 92, 1818–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hardiman, B.S.; Gough, C.M.; Halperin, A.; Hofmeister, K.L.; Nave, L.E.; Bohrer, G.; Curtis, P.S. Maintaining high rates of carbon storage in old forests: A mechanism linking canopy structure to forest function. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 298, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fahey, R.T.; Fotis, A.T.; Woods, K.D. Quantifying canopy complexity and effects on productivity and resilience in late-successional hemlock-hardwood forests. Ecol. Appl. 2015, 25, 834–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fichtner, A.; Forrester, D.I.; Härdtle, W.; Sturm, K.; von Oheimb, G. Facilitative-Competitive Interactions in an Old-Growth Forest: The Importance of Large-Diameter Trees as Benefactors and Stimulators for Forest Community Assembly. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0120335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jucker, T.; Bouriaud, O.; Coomes, D.A. Crown plasticity enables trees to optimize canopy packing in mixed-species forests. Funct. Ecol. 2015, 29, 1078–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Y.Y.; Dai, X.Z.; Chen, X.L.; Zhang, D.; Lin, G.Q.; Zhou, Y.H.; Wang, T.Y.; Cui, Y.L. Effects of urbanization and forest type on species composition and diversity, forest characteristics, biomass carbon sink, and their associations in Changchun, Northeast China: Implications for urban carbon stock improvement. J. For. Res. 2024, 35, 36. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mitchell, J.C.; Kashian, D.M.; Chen, X.W.; Cousins, S.; Flaspohler, D.; Gruner, D.S.; Johnson, J.S.; Surasinghe, T.D.; Zambrano, J.; Buma, B. Forest ecosystem properties emerge from interactions of structure and disturbance. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2023, 21, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, W.H.; Zhao, Z.R.; Zhao, Q.L.; Wang, Q.H.; Li, J.Y.; Li, M.Y.; Xie, L. Geographical study on the phylogenetic fauna of vascular plants in Beijing. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2024, 46, 35–44. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bai, F.H. Study on Species Diversity and Phylogenetic Diversity of Typical Shrub Plant Communities in Henan Province. Master’s Thesis, Shangdong University, Jinan, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wu, J.J. Attributes of Woody Plant Diversity in Changchun and Its Spatial Pattern Analysis. Master’s Thesis, Changchun University, Changchun, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, J.Y.; Yang, D.D.; Yang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.C. Influence of landscape pattern on ecosystem service supply-demand mismatch in Tianjin within the context of urbanization. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2024, 44, 4987–5002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, Z.H.; Wei, L.; Zhou, Y. Constructing sustainable landscape patterns for enhancing urban biodiversity. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2024, 44, 5905–5913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lindenmayer, D.B.; Cunningham, R.B.; Donnelly, C.F.; Lesslie, R. On the use of landscape surrogates as ecological indicators in fragmented forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2002, 159, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Morelli, F.; Pruscini, F.; Santolini, R.; Perna, P.; Benedetti, Y.; Sisti, D. Landscape heterogeneity metrics as indicators of bird diversity: Determining the optimal spatial scales in different landscapes. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 34, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Uuemaa, E.; Mander, Ü.; Marja, R. Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: A review. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 28, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, J.H.; Shi, W.J.; Zhou, W.Q.; Wang, J.H.; Qian, Y.G.; Wang, W.M. A review on the driving factors and their characteristics in urban landscape pattern changes. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2024, 44, 10486–10498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jim, C.Y.; Chen, W.Y. Urbanization Effect on Floristic and Landscape Patterns of Green Spaces. Landsc. Res. 2009, 34, 581–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, J.M.; Li, X.L.; Li, S.M.; Liang, H.; Lu, H.C. The woody plant diversity and landscape pattern of fine-resolution urban forest along a distance gradient from points of interest in Qingdao. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 122, 107326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ma, Z.J.; Zhai, C.; Ren, Z.B.; Zhang, D.; Hu, N.L.; Zhang, P.; Guo, Y.J.; Wang, C.C.; Hong, S.Y.; Hong, W.H. Spatial pattern of urban forest diversity and its potential drivers in a snow climate city, Northeast China. Urban For. Urban Green. 2024, 94, 128260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Millward, A.A.; Sabir, S. Structure of a forested urban park: Implications for strategic management. J. Environ. Manag. 2010, 91, 2215–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chang, Y.F. Multidimensional Diversity Characteristics of Woody Plants in Changchun Parks and the Relationship with Biomass. Master’s Thesis, Changchun University, Changchun, China, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huang, X.; Huang, X.J.; Chen, C. The Characteristic, Mechanism and Regulation of Urban Spatial Expansion of Changchun. Areal Res. Dev. 2009, 28, 68–72. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yan, Z.G.; Teng, M.J.; He, W.; Liu, A.Q.; Li, Y.R.; Wang, P.C. Impervious surface area is a key predictor for urban plant diversity in a city undergone rapid urbanization. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 650, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chang, Y.F.; Wang, Z.H.; Zhang, D.; Fu, Y.; Zhai, C.; Wang, T.; Yang, Y.H.; Wu, J.J. Analysis of Urban Woody Plant Diversity among Different Administrative Districts and the Enhancement Strategy in Changchun City, China. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, D.; Wang, W.J.; Zheng, H.F.; Ren, Z.B.; Zhai, C.; Tang, Z.; Shen, G.Q.; He, X.Y. Effects of urbanization intensity on forest structural-taxonomic attributes, landscape patterns and their associations in Changchun, Northeast China: Implications for urban green infrastructure planning. Ecol. Indic. 2017, 80, 286–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wu, F.F.; Liu, N.; He, C.M.; Yuan, Z.Q.; Hao, Z.Q.; Yin, Q.L. Elevational gradient pattern of woody plant community structure and diversity in the Qinling Mountains. Biodivers. Sci. 2024, 32, 7–25. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ali, A.; Yan, E.R.; Chen, H.Y.H.; Chang, S.X.; Zhao, Y.T.; Yang, X.D.; Xu, M.S. Stand structural diversity rather than species diversity enhances aboveground carbon storage in secondary subtropical forests in Eastern China. Biogeosciences 2016, 13, 4627–4635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chai, Y.F.; Yue, M.; Liu, X.; Guo, Y.X.; Wang, M.; Xu, J.S.; Zhang, C.G.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, L.X.; Zhang, R.C. Patterns of taxonomic, phylogenetic diversity during a long-Term succession of forest on the Loess Plateau, China: Insights into assembly process. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Qian, H.; FIELD, R.; Zhang, J.L.; Zhang, J.; Chen, S.B. Phylogenetic structure and ecological and evolutionary determinants of species richness for angiosperm trees in forest communities in China. J. Biogeogr. 2016, 43, 603–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gao, Y.T.; Wang, M.; Bi, X.; Liu, Y.H.; Wu, C.Y.; Chen, G.J.; Kuang, S.J.; Li, S.P.; Song, C.H.; Li, J.X. Plant phylogenetic diversity along the urban-rural gradient and its association with urbanization degree in Shanghai, China. Landsc. Ecol. 2024, 39, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, R.W.; Ying, J.; Zhang, R.T.; Zhang, Y.Q. Urban green and blue infrastructure: Unveiling the spatiotemporal impact on carbon emissions in China’s Yangtze River Delta. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 18512–18526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Han, Y.; Guo, X.; Jiang, Y.F.; Rao, L.; Sun, K.; Yu, H.M. Correlation analysis between cultivated land quality and landscape pattern index in south hilly areas. Jiangsu J. Agric. Sci. 2018, 34, 1057–1065. [Google Scholar]
  43. Li, Q.W. Study on Relationship Between Biodiversity and Landscape Pattern of Nature Reserves in Zhejiang Province. Master’s Thesis, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rosseel, Y. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. J. Stat. Softw. 2012, 48, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cheng, X.L.; Cubino, J.P.; Balfour, K.; Zhu, Z.X.; Wang, H.F. Drivers of spontaneous and cultivated species diversity in the tropical city of Zhanjiang, China. Urban For. Urban Green. 2022, 67, 127428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Guo, L.Y.; Nizamani, M.M.; Harris, A.; Cubino, J.P.; Johnson, J.B.; Cui, J.P.; Zhang, H.L.; Zhou, J.J.; Zhu, Z.X.; Wang, H.F. Anthropogenic factors explain urban plant diversity across three tropical cities in China. Urban For. Urban Green. 2024, 95, 128323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Maurer, M.; Zaval, L.; Orlove, B.; Moraga, V.; Culligan, P. More than nature: Linkages between well-being and greenspace influenced by a combination of elements of nature and non-nature in a New York City urban park. Urban For. Urban Green. 2021, 61, 127081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, D.L.; Wu, S.Y.; Liang, Z.; Li, S.C. The impacts of urbanization and climate change on urban vegetation dynamics in China. Urban For. Urban Green. 2020, 54, 126764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hooper, D.U.; Chapin, F.S.; Ewel, J.J.; Hector, A.; Inchausti, P.; Lavorel, S.; Lawton, J.H.; Lodge, D.M.; Loreau, M.; Naeem, S.; et al. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr. 2005, 75, 3–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, J.; Zhao, W.W.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Liu, Y.X. Effects of reforestation on plant species diversity on the Loess Plateau of China: A case study in Danangou catchment. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 651, 979–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Wang, Y.N.; Chang, Q.; Li, X.Y. Promoting sustainable carbon sequestration of plants in urban greenspace by planting design: A case study in parks of Beijing. Urban For. Urban Green. 2021, 64, 127291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ceplová, N.; Lososová, Z.; Zeleny, D.; Chytry, M.; Danihelka, J.; Fajmon, K.; Láníková, D.; Preislerová, Z.; Rehorek, V.; Tichy, L. Phylogenetic diversity of central-European urban plant communities: Effects of alien species and habitat types. Preslia 2015, 87, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhan, B. Functional and Phylogenetic Diversity of Shrubs Under Two Typical Mixed Forests in Zijin Mountain. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  54. Li, Y. Variation of Leaf Trait Network Among Different Vegetation Types and Its Influencing Factors. Master’s Thesis, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dadashpoor, H.; Azizi, P.; Moghadasi, M. Land use change, urbanization, and change in landscape pattern in a metropolitan area. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 655, 707–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zheng, L.; Lu, J.Z.; Liu, H.; Chen, X.L.; Yesou, H. Evidence of vegetation greening benefitting from the afforestation initiatives in China. Geo Spat. Inf. Sci. 2024, 27, 683–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, C.; Park, T.; Wang, X.H.; Piao, S.L.; Xu, B.D.; Chaturvedi, R.K.; Fuchs, R.; Brovkin, V.; Ciais, P.; Fensholt, R.; et al. China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management. Nat. Sustain. 2019, 2, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Amici, V.; Rocchini, D.; Filibeck, G.; Bacaro, G.; Santi, E.; Geri, F.; Landi, S.; Scoppola, A.; Chiarucci, A. Landscape structure effects on forest plant diversity at local scale: Exploring the role of spatial extent. Ecol. Complex. 2015, 21, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Czortek, P.; Pielech, R. Surrounding landscape influences functional diversity of plant species in urban parks. Urban For. Urban Green. 2020, 47, 126525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Che, Y.; Jin, G.Z. Effects of species diversity and phylogenetic diversity on productivity of a mixed broad leaved-Korean pine forest. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2019, 30, 2241–2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, W.F.; Lei, X.D.; Ma, Z.H.; Kneeshaw, D.D.; Peng, C.H. Positive Relationship between Aboveground Carbon Stocks and Structural Diversity in Spruce-Dominated Forest Stands in New Brunswick, Canada. For. Sci. 2011, 57, 506–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yachi, S.; Loreau, M. Does complementary resource use enhance ecosystem functioning? A model of light competition in plant communities. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Lei, X.D.; Wang, W.F.; Peng, C.H. Relationships between stand growth and structural diversity in spruce-dominated forests in New Brunswick, Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 2009, 39, 1835–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Browning, M.; Lee, K.; Wolf, K.L. Tree cover shows an inverse relationship with depressive symptoms in elderly residents living in U.S. nursing homes. Urban For. Urban Green. 2019, 41, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lyu, L.; Sho, K.; Zhao, H.; Song, Y.K.; Uchiyama, Y.; Kim, J.; Sakai, T. Construction, assessment, and protection of green infrastructure networks from a dynamic perspective: A case study of Dalian City, Liaoning Province, China. Urban For. Urban Green. 2024, 101, 128545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) The study area in Changchun, Jilin Province, China; (b) plots in 29 urban parks; (c) green spaces patches in North Lake Wetland Park; (d) green spaces patches in South Lake Park; (e) plots in South Lake Park, and (f) plots in Changchun Park, Forest Park, and Tianjia Park.
Figure 1. (a) The study area in Changchun, Jilin Province, China; (b) plots in 29 urban parks; (c) green spaces patches in North Lake Wetland Park; (d) green spaces patches in South Lake Park; (e) plots in South Lake Park, and (f) plots in Changchun Park, Forest Park, and Tianjia Park.
Land 14 00675 g001
Figure 2. Species diversity attributes of woody plants, trees and shrubs in different construction periods in urban parks. (a) Species Richness (SR), (b) Margalef richness index (dMa), (c) Shannon–Wiener diversity Index (H′), and (d) Pielou Evenness index (J′). Mean values sharing different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05), and mean values sharing the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Figure 2. Species diversity attributes of woody plants, trees and shrubs in different construction periods in urban parks. (a) Species Richness (SR), (b) Margalef richness index (dMa), (c) Shannon–Wiener diversity Index (H′), and (d) Pielou Evenness index (J′). Mean values sharing different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05), and mean values sharing the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Land 14 00675 g002
Figure 3. Structural diversity attributes for different construction periods in urban parks. (a) DBH diversity index (Hd), (b) Height diversity index (Hh). Mean values sharing different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05), and mean values sharing the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Figure 3. Structural diversity attributes for different construction periods in urban parks. (a) DBH diversity index (Hd), (b) Height diversity index (Hh). Mean values sharing different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05), and mean values sharing the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Land 14 00675 g003
Figure 4. Phylogenetic diversity attributes of woody plants, trees, and shrubs for different construction periods in urban parks. (a) Net relatedness index (NRI), (b) net nearest taxon index (NTI), and (c) Faith’s phylogenetic diversity (PD). Mean values sharing different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05), and mean values sharing the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Figure 4. Phylogenetic diversity attributes of woody plants, trees, and shrubs for different construction periods in urban parks. (a) Net relatedness index (NRI), (b) net nearest taxon index (NTI), and (c) Faith’s phylogenetic diversity (PD). Mean values sharing different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05), and mean values sharing the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Land 14 00675 g004
Figure 5. Landscape pattern metrics for different construction periods in urban parks. (a) Total Area (TA), (b) Edge Density (ED), (c) Mean Patch Area (AREA-MN). (d) Area-Weighted Mean Contiguity Index (CONTIG-MN), (e) Mean Patch Shape Index (SHAPE-MN), (f) Mean Perimeter Area Ratio (PARA-MN). (g) Patch Cohesion Index (COHESION), (h) Landscape Division Index (DIVISION), (i) Patch Density (PD), and (j) Aggregation Index (AI). Mean values sharing different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05), and mean values sharing the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Figure 5. Landscape pattern metrics for different construction periods in urban parks. (a) Total Area (TA), (b) Edge Density (ED), (c) Mean Patch Area (AREA-MN). (d) Area-Weighted Mean Contiguity Index (CONTIG-MN), (e) Mean Patch Shape Index (SHAPE-MN), (f) Mean Perimeter Area Ratio (PARA-MN). (g) Patch Cohesion Index (COHESION), (h) Landscape Division Index (DIVISION), (i) Patch Density (PD), and (j) Aggregation Index (AI). Mean values sharing different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05), and mean values sharing the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Land 14 00675 g005
Figure 6. The structural equation model (SEM) shows the complex associations among species diversity attributes, phylogenetic diversity attributes, structural diversity attributes, and landscape pattern metrics across different construction periods. Standardized coefficients (values near arrows) are shown for each causal path. Solid black lines represent significant positive paths, and dashed black lines represent significant negative paths; the two variables pointed by the double-headed arrows are correlated, labeled as covariance (*** indicate p < 0.001, ** indicate p < 0.01, * indicate p < 0.05).
Figure 6. The structural equation model (SEM) shows the complex associations among species diversity attributes, phylogenetic diversity attributes, structural diversity attributes, and landscape pattern metrics across different construction periods. Standardized coefficients (values near arrows) are shown for each causal path. Solid black lines represent significant positive paths, and dashed black lines represent significant negative paths; the two variables pointed by the double-headed arrows are correlated, labeled as covariance (*** indicate p < 0.001, ** indicate p < 0.01, * indicate p < 0.05).
Land 14 00675 g006
Table 1. Urban parks during different construction periods.
Table 1. Urban parks during different construction periods.
Construction PeriodPark Name
before 1940South Lake Park, Children Park, Chaoyang Park, Shengli Park
1940–2000Daishan Park, Labour Park, Junzilan Park, Forest Park, Zoo and Botanical Garden, Mudan Garden, Xinghuacun Park, Changchun Park
2001–2020Friendship Park, Sculpture Park, Jinjiang Park, Tianjia Park, Guanlan Lake Park, Baihua Park, Car Park, Beihai Park, Shuiwenhua Park, Changchun Industrial Trajectory Park, Kuancheng central Park, Changchun Youth Park, Nanxi Wetland Park, Yuehe Cultural Park, Binhe Park, North Lake Wetland Park, Baimu Park
Table 2. The number of family, genera, and species classification in different construction periods of urban parks in Changchun city.
Table 2. The number of family, genera, and species classification in different construction periods of urban parks in Changchun city.
Construction PeriodBefore 19401940–20002001–2020
Family (tree)202017
Genera (tree)343533
Species (tree)626473
Family (shrub)1199
Genera (shrub)201919
Species (shrub)242325
Table 3. The top three most common woody plant species in different construction periods of urban parks in Changchun city.
Table 3. The top three most common woody plant species in different construction periods of urban parks in Changchun city.
Construction PeriodTree SpeciesShrub Species
before 1940Pinus tabuliformis var. Mukdensis, Larix olgensis, Quercus mongolicaSambucus williamsii, Lonicera japonica, Forsythia mandschurica
1940–2000Pinus sylvestris var. Mongolica, Abies holophylla, Fraxinus mandshuricaLigustrum quihoui, Lonicera japonica, Weigela florida
2001–2020Pinus sylvestris var. Mongolica, Picea koraiensis, Betula platyphyllaLonicera tatarica, Lonicera japonica, Prunus salicina
Table 4. The SEM analysis of the effect of different construction periods on species diversity, phylogenetic diversity, structural diversity, and landscape patterns.
Table 4. The SEM analysis of the effect of different construction periods on species diversity, phylogenetic diversity, structural diversity, and landscape patterns.
Response VariableMediate VariablePredictor VariablePathwayStandardp-ValueSignificance/Total
Direct effects
Woody species diversity Different construction periodsDirect−0.140.02490% (9/10)
Tree species diversity Different construction periodsDirect−0.240.000
Shrub species diversity Different construction periodsDirect0.220.001
Woody species phylogenetic diversity Different construction periodsDirect−0.190.003
Tree species phylogenetic diversity Different construction periodsDirect−0.140.032
Shrub species phylogenetic diversity Different construction periodsDirect0.020.738
Structural diversity Different construction periodsDirect−0.200.002
landscape patterns Different construction periodsDirect−0.270.000
Tree species diversity Structural diversityDirect0.040.045
Shrub species phylogenetic diversity Shrub species diversityDirect0.210.003
Indirect effects
Tree species diversityStructural diversityDifferent construction periodsIndirect−0.00800.024100% (2/2)
Shrub species phylogenetic diversityShrub species diversityDifferent construction periodsIndirect0.04620.024
Total effects
Tree species diversity Different construction periodsTotal−0.24800.02450% (1/2)
Shrub species phylogenetic diversity Different construction periodsTotal0.06620.291
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yao, X.; Zhang, D.; Song, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.; Chang, Y.; Ma, X.; Lu, Z.; Wang, Y. Effects of Urban Park Construction Period on Plant Multidimensional Diversities, Landscape Patterns of Green Spaces, and Their Associations in Changchun City, Northeast China. Land 2025, 14, 675. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14040675

AMA Style

Yao X, Zhang D, Song Y, Zhang H, Zhang X, Chang Y, Ma X, Lu Z, Wang Y. Effects of Urban Park Construction Period on Plant Multidimensional Diversities, Landscape Patterns of Green Spaces, and Their Associations in Changchun City, Northeast China. Land. 2025; 14(4):675. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14040675

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yao, Xiao, Dan Zhang, Yuhang Song, Hongjian Zhang, Xiaolei Zhang, Yufei Chang, Xinyuan Ma, Ziyue Lu, and Yuanyuan Wang. 2025. "Effects of Urban Park Construction Period on Plant Multidimensional Diversities, Landscape Patterns of Green Spaces, and Their Associations in Changchun City, Northeast China" Land 14, no. 4: 675. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14040675

APA Style

Yao, X., Zhang, D., Song, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, X., Chang, Y., Ma, X., Lu, Z., & Wang, Y. (2025). Effects of Urban Park Construction Period on Plant Multidimensional Diversities, Landscape Patterns of Green Spaces, and Their Associations in Changchun City, Northeast China. Land, 14(4), 675. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14040675

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop