Impacts of Local Government Perceptions of Disaster Risks on Land Resilience Planning Implementation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Land-Use Decisions and Climate Adaptation
1.2. Conceptual Framework
1.2.1. Hazard-Specific Risks
1.2.2. Managers’ Risk Perceptions
- Yi is the planning efforts for the ith observation.
- Risk Perceptioni is the managers’ risk perception for the ith observation.
- Objective Riski is the objective hazard risk for the ith observation.
- β0 is the intercept.
- β1 is the coefficient for the managers’ risk perceptions.
- β2 is the coefficient for the objective hazard risks.
- ϵi is the error term for the ith observation.
Local government managers’ perception of the risk that specific hazards might seriously and negatively affect their municipality in the next 10 years in terms of physical and economic damage will be positively related to disaster resilience planning.
Local disaster resilience planning policy implementation will be positively related to managers’ perception that specific hazards might seriously and negatively affect their municipality in the next 10 years in terms of physical and economic damage.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Hazard Level Variables
2.2. City-Level Variables
2.3. Analysis Methods
3. Results
3.1. Descriptive Analysis
3.2. Hypothesis Tests
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- May, P.J.; Winter, S.C. Politicians, Managers, and Street-Level Bureaucrats: Influences on Policy Implementation. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2009, 19, 453–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahm, D.; Reddick, C.G. US City Managers’ Perceptions of Disaster Risks: Consequences for Urban Emergency Management. J. Contingencies Crisis Manag. 2011, 19, 136–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bae, J.; Feiock, R. Forms of Government and Climate Change Policies in U.S. Cities. Urban Stud. 2013, 50, 776–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Q.; Yi, H. Complementarity and substitutability: A review of state level renewable energy policy instrument interactions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 67, 683–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swann, W.L. Examining the Impact of Local Collaborative Tools on Urban Sustainability Efforts: Does the Managerial Environment Matter? Am. Rev. Public Adm. 2017, 47, 455–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, K.; Zhao, Z.; Feiock, R.; Ramaswami, A. Patterns of Urban Infrastructure Capital Investment in Chinese Cities and Explanation through a Political Market. Lens. J. Urban Aff. 2019, 41, 248–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramírez, E.E.; Castillo, M.F.; Sánchez, E.I. How Policy Entrepreneurs Encourage or Hinder Urban Growth within a Political Market. Urban Aff. Rev. 2023, 59, 1250–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farmer, J.L. State-Level Influences on Community-Level Municipal Sustainable Energy Policies. Urban Aff. Rev. 2022, 58, 1065–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tavares, A.F. Advancing the Research Agenda on Local Territorial Reforms: Taking Time and Space Seriously. In Local Government in Europe; Bristol University Press: Bristol, UK, 2021; pp. 3–17. [Google Scholar]
- Mehrotra, S.; Natenzon, C.E.; Omojola, A.; Folorunsho, R.; Gilbride, J.; Rosenzweig, C. Framework for City Climate Risk Assessment. In Fifth Urban Research Symposium; World Bank: Marseille, France, 2009; pp. 28–30. [Google Scholar]
- Dvir, R.; Goldsmith, C.; Seavey, I.; Vedlitz, A. Local-level managers’ attitudes towards natural hazards resilience: The case of Texas. Environ. Hazards 2023, 22, 243–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, X.; Yue, L.; Gao, X. Exploring the carbon emission reduction effect of local government attention: An analysis based on an environmental policy perspective. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 30, 107634–107649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J. Doing good in periods of political turnover: The turnover of local officials, local corruption and corporate social responsibility. Eurasian Bus. Rev. 2013, 13, 781–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, X.; Huang, R. Leading Officials’ Audits of Natural-Resource Assets and Local Environmental Attention: Evidence of Word Frequency Analysis from Chinese Local Government Work Reports. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Feiock, R.C.; Kim, S. The Political Market and Sustainability Policy. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malalgoda, C.; Amaratunga, D.; Haigh, R. Overcoming Challenges Faced by Local Governments in Creating a Resilient Built Environment in Cities. Disaster Prev. Manag. 2016, 25, 628–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Curley, C.; Federman, P.S.; Shen, R. Expanding the Political Market Framework to Explain Executive Decision-Making During the COVID-19 Crisis. Public Admin Rev. 2023, 83, 1281–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumert, K.; Herzog, T.; Pershing, J. Navigating the Numbers: Greenhouse Gas Data and International Climate Policy; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Bradley, R.; Baumert, K.A.; Childs, B.; Herzog, T.; Pershing, J. Slicing the Pie: Sector-Based Approaches to International Climate Agreements: Issues and Options; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Campbell, S.; Fainstein, S.S. (Eds.) Readings in Planning Theory; Blackwell Publishers: Cambridge, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, M.; You, S.; Chon, J.; Lee, J. Sustainable Land-Use Planning to Improve the Coastal Resilience of the Social-Ecological Landscape. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hung, H.-C.; Yang, C.-Y.; Chien, C.-Y.; Liu, Y.-C. Building resilience: Mainstreaming community participation into integrated assessment of resilience to climatic hazards in metropolitan land use management. Land Use Policy 2016, 50, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alibašić, H. Sustainability and Resilience Planning for Local Governments; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ahern, J. From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landsc. Urban Plan 2011, 100, 341–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leiserowitz, A.; Verner, M.; Goddard, E.; Wood, E.; Carman, J.; Ordaz Reynoso, N.; Thulin, E.; Rosenthal, S.; Marlon, J.; Buttermore, N. International Public Opinion on Climate Change, 2023; Yale Program on Climate Change Communication: New Haven, CT, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Basher, R. Global Early Warning Systems for Natural Hazards: Systematic and People-Centred. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2006, 364, 2167–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Kelman, I. Climate change and the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction. Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci. 2015, 6, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González, C.; Díez, L.A.; Antequera, D.P.; Raya, M.N. The perception of climate change in island areas: The case of Tenerife. Boletín Asoc. Española Geogr. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Comfort, L.K.; Waugh, W.; Cigler, B. Emergency management research and practice in public administration: Emergency, evolution, expansion, and future directions. Public Admin. Rev. 2012, 72, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, M.; Hwang, J.; Ki, N. How Perceived Risks in Interorganizational Collaboration Shape Disaster Response Strategies. Public Adm. Dev. 2024, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- King, D.; Gurtner, Y.; Firdaus, A.; Harwood, S.; Cottrell, A. Land use planning for disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation: Operationalizing policy and legislation at local levels. Int. J. Disaster Resil. Built Environ. 2016, 7, 158–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryu, J.; Leschine, T.M.; Nam, J.; Chang, K.W.; Dyson, K. A Resilience-Based Approach for Comparing Expert Preferences across Two Large-Scale Coastal Management Programs. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pielke, R., Sr. Land Use and Climate Change. Science 2005, 310, 1625–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Foley, J.A.; DeFries, R.; Asner, G.P.; Barford, C.; Bonan, G.; Carpenter, S.R.; Chapin, F.S.; Coe, M.T.; Daily, G.C.; Gibbs, H.K.; et al. Global consequences of land use. Science 2005, 309, 570–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Vries, F.T.; Liiri, M.E.; Bjørnlund, L.; Bowker, M.A.; Christensen, S.; Setälä, H.M.; Bardgett, R.D. Land use alters the resistance and resilience of soil food webs to drought. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2012, 2, 276–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Z.; Singh, M. Assessing Coastal Vulnerability and Evaluating the Effectiveness of Natural Habitats in Enhancing Coastal Resilience: A Case Study in Shanghai, China. Sustainability 2024, 16, 609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira, Z.; Gonçalves, F. Resilience to Land Use Induced Impacts. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 2016. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/29520 (accessed on 22 December 2023).
- Khew, Y.T.J.; Jarzebski, M.P.; Dyah, F.; San Carlos, R.; Gu, J.; Esteban, M.; Aránguiz, R.; Akiyama, T. Assessment of social perception on the contribution of hard-infrastructure for tsunami mitigation to coastal community resilience after the 2010 tsunami: Greater Concepcion area, Chile. Int. J. Disaster Risk 2015, 13, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X. Land Use Policy as an Instrument of Resilience—The Case of Land Withdrawal Mechanism for Rural Homesteads in China. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 87, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.-H.; Huang, S.-L.; Budd, W.W. Resilience Analysis of the Interaction between Typhoons and Land Use Change. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 106, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cumming, G.S. Spatial resilience: Integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability. Landsc. Ecol. 2011, 26, 899–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bowen, R.E.; Riley, C. Socio-economic indicators and integrated coastal management. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2003, 46, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.W.; Andrew, S.A.; Yoon, D.K. Interorganizational Collaboration for the Implementation of Hazard Mitigation Strategies. Nat. Hazards Rev. 2024, 25, 04024017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palliyaguru, R.; Amaratunga, D.; Baldry, D. Constructing a Holistic Approach to Disaster Risk Reduction: Significance of Focusing on Vulnerability Reduction. Disasters 2014, 38, 45–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Anderies, J.M.; Janssen, M.A.; Ostrom, E. A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecol. Soc. 2004, 9, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grothmann, T.; Patt, A. Adaptive Capacity and Human Cognition: The Process of Individual Adaptation to Climate Change. Glob. Environ. Change 2005, 15, 199–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tavares, A.F. Land Use Management: Local Institutions and the Power to Shape. In Handbook on Local and Regional Governance; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2023; p. 297. [Google Scholar]
- Cutter, S.L.; Barnes, L.; Berry, M.; Burton, C.; Evans, E.; Tate, E.; Webb, J. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2008, 18, 598–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ICMA. Building Your Resilience: Creating Balance. In Proceedings of the ICMA Southeast Regional Meeting, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2–4 March 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Siri, J.G.; Newell, B.; Proust, K.; Capon, A. Urbanization, Extreme Events, and Health: The Case for Systems Approaches in Mitigation, Management, and Response. Asia Pac. J. Public Health 2016, 28, 15S–27S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerber, B.J. Local Governments and Climate Change in the United States: Assessing Administrators’ Perspectives on Hazard Management Challenges and Responses. State Local Gov. Rev. 2015, 47, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manikutty, S. Community Participation: So What? Evidence from a Comparative Study of Two Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Projects in India. Dev. Policy Rev. 1997, 15, 115–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keenan, J.M. Types and forms of resilience in local planning in the US: Who does what? Environ. Sci. Policy 2018, 88, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chand, A.V.M. Place Based Approach to Plan for Resilient Cities: A Local Government Perspective. Procedia Eng. 2018, 212, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, D.N.; Esteban, M.; Motoharu, O. Resilience Adaptive Capacity Wheel: Challenges for Hotel Stakeholders in the Event of a Tsunami During the Tokyo Olympics. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021, 55, 102097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Somers, S. Measuring Resilience Potential: An Adaptive Strategy for Organizational Crisis Planning. J. Contingencies Crisis Manag. 2009, 17, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fastenrath, S.; Coenen, L.; Davidson, K. Urban Resilience in Action: The Resilient Melbourne Strategy as Transformative Urban Innovation Policy? Sustainability 2019, 11, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, M.; Hwang, J.; Seo, I. Collaboration Risk, Vulnerability, and Resource Sharing in Disaster Management Networks. Aust. J. Public Adm. 2024, 81, 487–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schipper, E.L. Meeting at the Crossroads?: Exploring the Linkages between Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction. Clim. Dev. 2009, 1, 16–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bullock, J.A.; Haddow, G.D.; Coppola, D.P. Mitigation, Prevention, and Preparedness. In Introduction to Homeland Security; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 435–494. [Google Scholar]
- Lei, Y.; Wang, J. A preliminary discussion on the opportunities and challenges of linking climate change adaptation with disaster risk reduction. Nat. Hazards 2014, 71, 1587–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamin, E.M.; Gurran, N.; Emlinger, A.M. Barriers to Municipal Climate Adaptation: Examples from Coastal Massachusetts’ Smaller Cities and Towns. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2014, 80, 110–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, Y.; Sun, J. A Spatial Analysis of Local Government Disaster Mitigation under State Rescaling in the U.S. In Proceedings of the Association for Budgeting and Financial Management Conference, Denver, CO, USA, 4–6 October 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Bausch, T.; Koziol, K. New Policy Approaches for Increasing Response to Climate Change in Small Rural Municipalities. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Therrien, M.-C.; Usher, S.; Matyas, D. Enabling Strategies and Impeding Factors to Urban Resilience Implementation: A Scoping Review. J. Contingencies Crisis Manag. 2020, 28, 83–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Comfort, L.K.; Boin, A.; Demchak, C.C. (Eds.) Designing Resilience: Preparing for Extreme Events; University of Pittsburgh Press: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2010; pp. 13–32. [Google Scholar]
- Andrew, S.; Chatterjee, V.; Webb, G. Disasters and the Private Sector: Impact of Extreme Events, Preparedness, and Contribution to Disaster Risk Reduction; Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Natural Hazard Science: Oxford, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Jung, K. Sources of Organizational Resilience for Sustainable Communities: An Institutional Collective Action Perspective. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatterjee, V.; Andrew, S.A.; Feiock, R.C. Linking Smart Growth Policies and Natural Disasters: A Study of Local Governments in Florida. In Case Studies in Suburban Sustainability; Garren, S.J., Brinkmann, R., Eds.; University Press of Florida: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2020; pp. 67–88. [Google Scholar]
- Chatterjee, V.; Arapis, T. Examining COVID-19 Response Among Local Governments Through the Political Market Framework. J. Emerg. Manag. 2023, 21, 111–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aylett, A. Progress and Challenges in the Urban Governance of Climate Change: Results of a Global Survey; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 1–200. [Google Scholar]
- Rosenzweig, C.; Solecki, W.D.; Romero-Lankao, P.; Mehrotra, S.; Dhakal, S.; Ibrahim, S.A. (Eds.) Climate Change and Cities: Second Assessment Report of the Urban Climate Change Research Network; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2018; pp. 585–606. [Google Scholar]
- Moser, S.C.; Tribbia, J. Vulnerability to Inundation and Climate Change Impacts in California: Coastal Managers’ Attitudes and Perceptions. Mar. Technol. Soc. J. 2006, 40, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wernstedt, K.; Roberts, P.S.; Arvai, J.; Redmond, K. How Emergency Managers (Mis?) Interpret Forecasts. Disasters 2019, 43, 88–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ross, H.; Berkes, F. Research Approaches for Understanding, Enhancing, and Monitoring Community Resilience. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2014, 27, 787–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Homsy, G.C.; Warner, M.E. Cities and Sustainability: Polycentric Action and Multilevel Governance. Urban Aff. Rev. 2015, 51, 46–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S. Integration of Policy Decision Making for Sustainable Land Use within Cities. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carr, E.R. From description to explanation: Using the livelihoods as intimate government (LIG) approach. Appl. Geogr. 2014, 52, 110–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imai, Y.; Kurisu, K. Local Government’s Perceptions about Climate-Change Impacts and Their Severities. J. Jpn. Soc. Civ. Eng. Ser. G (Environ. Res.) 2022, 78, II_99–II_107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woodruff, S.; Bowman, A.; Hannibal, B.; Sansom, G.; Portney, K. Urban resilience: Analyzing the policies of U.S. cities. Cities 2021, 115, 103239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, H.; Suo, L.; Shen, R.; Zhang, J.; Ramaswami, A.; Feiock, R. Regional Governance and Institutional Collective Action for Environmental Sustainability. Public Adm. Rev. 2018, 78, 556–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carr, J.B. What Have We Learned about the Performance of Council-Manager Government? A Review and Synthesis of the Research. Public Adm. Rev. 2015, 75, 673–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrew, S.; Carr, J.B. Mitigating Uncertainty and Risk in Planning for Regional Preparedness: The Role of Bonding and Bridging Relationships. Urban Stud. 2012, 50, 709–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ly, A.M.; Cope, M.R. New Conceptual Model of Social Sustainability: Review from Past Concepts and Ideas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 5350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, H.; Cui, C. Coping with functional collective action dilemma: Functional fragmentation and administrative integration. Public Manag. Rev. 2019, 21, 1052–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lubell, M.; Feiock, R.C.; De La Cruz, E.E.R. Local Institutions and the Politics of Urban Growth. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 2009, 53, 649–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lubell, M.; Feiock, R.C.; Ramirez, E. Political Institutions and Conservation by Local Governments. Urban Aff. Rev. 2005, 40, 706–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peacock, W.G.; Brody, S.D.; Seitz, W.A.; Merrill, W.J.; Vedlitz, A.; Zahran, S.; Harris, R.C.; Stickney, R.R. Advancing the Resilience of Coastal Localities: Developing, Implementing and Sustaining the Use of Coastal Resilience Indicators; Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center: College Station, TX, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Lubell, M.; Feiock, R.; Handy, S. City Adoption of Environmentally Sustainable Policies in California’s Central Valley. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2009, 75, 293–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramírez de la Cruz, E.E. Local Political Institutions and Smart Growth: An Empirical Study of the Politics of Compact Development. Urban Aff. Rev. 2009, 45, 218–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, T.L.; Potoski, M. Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2003, 13, 441–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, T.L.; Potoski, M.; Van Slyke, D.M. Changing modes of service delivery: How past choices structure future choices. Environ. Plann. C Gov. Policy 2008, 26, 127–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hazard | Not Concerned | Slightly Concerned | Moderately Concerned | Very Concerned | Extremely Concerned |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Major short-term flooding | 2.4% | 21.4% | 31.0% | 22.6% | 22.6% |
Rising sea levels | 26.0% | 18.4% | 26.2% | 14.5% | 14.5% |
Expanded storm surge zones | 25.3% | 16.0% | 12.0% | 26.7% | 20.0% |
High winds | 1.2% | 9.4% | 30.6% | 35.5% | 22.4% |
Policy Implementation | Not Implemented or Incomplete | Implementation Complete |
---|---|---|
Required official identification of community areas that experience repeated flooding plan status | 52.1% | 47.9% |
Conduct a vulnerability assessment for storm surge plan status | 80.8% | 19.2% |
Create land use and inventory map of coastal uses plan status | 77.8% | 22.2% |
Changed code to require climate proof ongoing public infrastructure improvements and development efforts plan status | 75.0% | 25.0% |
Policy Implementation | Bivariate Correlation with Manager Perception | Correlation with Manager Perception Controlling for Objective Risk |
---|---|---|
Required official identification of community areas that experience repeated flooding plan status | 0.09 | 0.08 |
Conduct a vulnerability assessment for storm surge plan status | 0.34 ** | 0.31 ** |
Create land use and inventory map of coastal uses plan status | 0.38 ** | 0.36 ** |
Changed code to require climate proof ongoing public infrastructure improvements and development efforts plan status | 0.54 ** | 0.49 ** |
Parameter | B | Std. Error | t |
---|---|---|---|
(Intercept) | −4.018 | 1.134 | −3.543 |
Manager’s Hazard Concern | 0.686 ** | 0.160 | 4.299 |
Objective Hazard Risk | 0.120 | 0.213 | 0.563 |
Council Manager Government | 0.732 | 0.387 | −1.894 |
2019 Population | 0.00012 | 0.00014 | 0.794 |
Median Income | 0.00198 ** | 0.00090 | 2.196 |
Percent Nonwhite | −0.0290 | 0.972 | −0.030 |
Nagelkerke | |||
Pseudo R2 = 0.18 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kim, S.; Andrew, S.A.; Ramirez de la Cruz, E.; Kim, W.-J.; Feiock, R.C. Impacts of Local Government Perceptions of Disaster Risks on Land Resilience Planning Implementation. Land 2024, 13, 1085. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13071085
Kim S, Andrew SA, Ramirez de la Cruz E, Kim W-J, Feiock RC. Impacts of Local Government Perceptions of Disaster Risks on Land Resilience Planning Implementation. Land. 2024; 13(7):1085. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13071085
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Soyoung, Simon A. Andrew, Edgar Ramirez de la Cruz, Woo-Je Kim, and Richard Clark Feiock. 2024. "Impacts of Local Government Perceptions of Disaster Risks on Land Resilience Planning Implementation" Land 13, no. 7: 1085. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13071085
APA StyleKim, S., Andrew, S. A., Ramirez de la Cruz, E., Kim, W. -J., & Feiock, R. C. (2024). Impacts of Local Government Perceptions of Disaster Risks on Land Resilience Planning Implementation. Land, 13(7), 1085. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13071085