Next Article in Journal
Integrated Models of Cleaner Production Technologies for Maize Cultivation in China’s Black Soil Regions
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Response of Ecosystem Services to Socioecological Factors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Seasonal Grazing Does Not Significantly Alter the Particle Structure and Pore Characteristics of Grassland Soil

1
Yinshanbeilu Grassland Eco-Hydrology National Observation and Research Station, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
2
School of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
3
School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2024, 13(6), 730; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060730
Submission received: 28 February 2024 / Revised: 16 May 2024 / Accepted: 20 May 2024 / Published: 23 May 2024

Abstract

Seasonal grazing is a recognized and sustainable approach to livestock management, but there is still a lack of comprehensive research on its impact on soil structure. This study utilizes advanced scanning electron microscopy technology to quantitatively evaluate the long-term effects of seasonal grazing on grassland soil structure, focusing on soil pore distribution characteristics and particle size. The investigation offers a detailed visual representation of the arrangement of soil particles at a micro-level. In both grazed and ungrazed plots (NG), soil particles ranging from 0.005 to 0.05 mm and 0.075 to 0.25 mm in size were predominant, constituting 20% and 60%, respectively. In plots subjected to seasonal grazing (grazing in June and August, G68, and grazing in July and September, G79), micro-particles (0.002–0.005 mm) and particles sized 0.05–0.075 mm were significantly lower compared to NG. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images demonstrate structural differences, with NG displaying a higher proportion of small to medium-sized particles, more small pores, and fewer large pores. Analysis of pore size and morphology reveals the prevalence of large pores in both grazed and ungrazed plots. Continuous grazing plots exhibit significantly higher proportions of large pores compared to NG, while seasonal grazing plots show no significant differences. Correlation analyses indicate associations between soil physicochemical properties, particle size, and pore structure. Total soil nitrogen (TN), total soil carbon (TC), and soil moisture positively correlate with 0.005–0.05 mm particle proportions, while EC is negatively correlated with 0.05–0.075 mm particles. This study enhances our understanding of the effects of grazing practices on soil structure and provides scientific evidence for sustainable land management.
Keywords: seasonal grazing; grassland; soil particle composition; soil pore characteristics seasonal grazing; grassland; soil particle composition; soil pore characteristics

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, J.; Zhang, R.; Cao, R.; Dong, S.; Baoyin, T.; Zhao, T. Seasonal Grazing Does Not Significantly Alter the Particle Structure and Pore Characteristics of Grassland Soil. Land 2024, 13, 730. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060730

AMA Style

Yang J, Zhang R, Cao R, Dong S, Baoyin T, Zhao T. Seasonal Grazing Does Not Significantly Alter the Particle Structure and Pore Characteristics of Grassland Soil. Land. 2024; 13(6):730. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060730

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Juejie, Ruiqi Zhang, Rong Cao, Shikui Dong, Taogetao Baoyin, and Tianqi Zhao. 2024. "Seasonal Grazing Does Not Significantly Alter the Particle Structure and Pore Characteristics of Grassland Soil" Land 13, no. 6: 730. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060730

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop