Exploring the Heterogeneities in the Impacts of China’s Grassland Ecological Compensation Program
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Data
2.2. Analytical Approach
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wunder, S.; Brouwer, R.; Engel, S.; Ezzine-De-Blas, D.; Muradian, R.; Pascual, U.; Pinto, R. From principles to practice in paying for nature’s services. Nat. Sustain. 2018, 1, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salzman, J.; Bennett, G.; Carroll, N.; Goldstein, A.; Jenkins, M. The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services. Nat. Sustain. 2018, 1, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Börner, J.; Baylis, K.; Corbera, E.; Ezzine-de-Blas, D.; Honey-Rosés, J.; Persson, U.M.; Wunder, S. The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services. World Dev. 2017, 96, 359–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farley, J.; Costanza, R. Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 2060–2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ezzine-De-Blas, D.; Wunder, S.; Ruiz-Pérez, M.; Moreno-Sanchez, R.D. Global Patterns in the Implementation of Payments for Environmental Services. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ruggiero, P.G.C.; Metzger, J.P.; Tambosi, L.R.; Nichols, E. Payment for ecosystem services programs in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: Effective but not enough. Land Use Policy 2019, 82, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, P.; Misra, S.; Ervin, R. A Qualitative Choice Analysis of Factors Influencing Post-CRP Land Use Decisions. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 1997, 29, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morefield, P.E.; LeDuc, S.D.; Clark, C.M.; Iovanna, R. Grasslands, wetlands, and agriculture: The fate of land expiring from the Conservation Reserve Program in the Midwestern United States. Environ. Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Longo, M.; Dal Ferro, N.; Lazzaro, B.; Morari, F. Trade-offs among ecosystem services advance the case for improved spatial targeting of agri-environmental measures. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 285, 112131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pagiola, S. Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65, 712–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madriz, A. Costa Rica Invirtió Más de ¢11 Mil Millones Para Pago por Servicios Ambientales en 2022. Available online: https://www.larepublica.net/noticia/costa-rica-invirtio-mas-de-11-mil-millones-para-pago-por-servicios-ambientales-en-2022 (accessed on 8 September 2023).
- Yang, W.; Lu, Q. Integrated evaluation of payments for ecosystem services programs in China: A systematic review. Ecosyst. Health Sustain. 2018, 4, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schirpke, U.; Marino, D.; Marucci, A.; Palmieri, M. Positive effects of payments for ecosystem services on biodiversity and socio-economic development: Examples from Natura 2000 sites in Italy. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 34, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Bilsborrow, R.E.; Song, C.H.; Tao, S.Q.; Huang, Q.F. Rural household income distribution and inequality in China: Effects of payments for ecosystem services policies and other factors. Ecol. Econ. 2019, 160, 114–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sheng, J.C.; Wang, H. Participation, income growth and poverty alleviation in payments for ecosystem services: The case of China’s Wolong Nature Reserve. Ecol. Econ. 2022, 196, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, T.; Shen, W.W.; Qiu, X.; Chang, H.; Yang, H.B.; Yang, W. Impact evaluation of a payments for ecosystem services program on vegetation quantity and quality restoration in Inner Mongolia. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 303, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arriagada, R.; Ferraro, P.; Sills, E.; Pattanayak, S.; Cordero-Sancho, S. Do Payments for Environmental Services Affect Forest Cover? A Farm-Level Evaluation from Costa Rica. Land Econ. 2012, 88, 382–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sierra, R.; Russman, E. On the efficiency of environmental service payments: A forest conservation assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 59, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.; Wang, S.; Fu, B.; Liu, J. Spatial variation and influencing factors of the effectiveness of afforestation in China’s Loess Plateau. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 771, 144904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Zhang, Q.; Peterson, M.N.; Song, C. Feedback effect of crop raiding in payments for ecosystem services. Ambio 2019, 48, 732–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Lupi, F.; Liu, J. Accounting for ecosystem services in compensating for the costs of effective conservation in protected areas. Biol. Conserv. 2017, 215, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ou, W. Agricultural Ecological Compensation Mechanism in Grazing Forbidden Area. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2006, 16, 33–38. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Q.; Wang, G.; Yuan, R.Y.; Singh, V.P.; Wu, W.H.; Wang, D.Z. Dynamic responses of ecological vulnerability to land cover shifts over the Yellow river Basin, China. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 144, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, X. The Influence of Policies of Returning Grazing Land to Forage Land on the Nomads Living. Chin. J. Grassl. 2011, 33, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, T.; Yang, H.B.; Qiu, X.; Sun, H.L.; Song, P.L.; Yang, W. China’s grassland ecological compensation policy achieves win-win goals in Inner Mongolia. Environ. Res. Commun. 2023, 5, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.Y.; Fan, J.W.; Cao, W.; Zhong, H.P.; Harris, W.; Gong, G.L.; Zhang, Y.X. Changes in multiple ecosystem services between 2000 and 2013 and their driving factors in the Grazing Withdrawal Program, China. Ecol. Eng. 2018, 116, 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, Y.; Hou, Y.; Langford, C.; Bai, H.; Hou, X. Herder stocking rate and household income under the Grassland Ecological Protection Award Policy in northern China. Land Use Policy 2019, 82, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.M.; Bai, L.M.; Khan, H.S.; Li, H. The Influence of the Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy on Regional Herdsmen’s Income and Its Gap: Evidence from Six Pastoralist Provinces in China. Agriculture 2023, 13, 775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, L.; Xiao, T.; Zhao, Z.P.; Sun, C.Y.; Liu, J.Y.; Shao, Q.Q.; Fan, J.W.; Wang, J.B. Effects of grassland restoration programs on ecosystems in arid and semiarid China. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 117, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.; Li, Z.S.; Fu, B.J.; Lu, F.; Wang, D.B.; Liu, H.F.; Liu, G.H. Effects of grazing exclusion on soil carbon and nitrogen storage in semi-arid grassland in Inner Mongolia, China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2014, 24, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, L.L.; Xia, F.; Chen, Q.H.; Huang, J.K.; He, Y.; Rose, N.; Rozelle, S. Grassland ecological compensation policy in China improves grassland quality and increases herders’ income. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, H.; Zhao, Y.; Kalhoro, G.M. Ecological Response of the Subsidy and Incentive System for Grassland Conservation in China. Land 2022, 11, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, Q.F.; Shi, Y.; Xiang, Z.Y.; Shao, H.Y.; Xian, W.; Peng, P.H.; Li, C.Y.; Li, Q.R. Monitoring the Grassland Change in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: A Case Study on Aba County. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 2018, 46, 569–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An, Y.; Zhou, L.; Chen, Y. Effects of Ecological Policy on Farmers’Income Based on the Propensity Score Matching Method: A case study of Returning Grazing Land to Grasslandin Yanchi, Ningxia. J. Desert Res. 2016, 36, 823–829. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, S.; Zhao, K. Evaluation of the Effects of Implementing Degraded Grassland Ecosystem Restoration Technology: A Case Study on Technology for Returning Grazing Land to Grasslan. J. Resour. Ecol. 2017, 8, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, K.W.; Etchart, N.; Holland, M.; Naughton-Treves, L.; Arriagada, R. The impact of paying for forest conservation on perceived tenure security in Ecuador. Conserv. Lett. 2020, 13, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butsic, V.; Lewis, D.J.; Radeloff, V.C.; Baumann, M.; Kuemmerle, T. Quasi-experimental methods enable stronger inferences from observational data in ecology. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2017, 19, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Huang, X. The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2021, 13, 3907–3925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Google; USGS; Carnegie Mellon University. Google Earth Engine. Available online: https://earthengine.google.com (accessed on 16 December 2022).
- Dai, S.; Fu, Y.; Zhao, Y. The Remote Sensing Model for Estimating Urban Impervious Surface Percentage Based on the Cubist Model Tree. J. Geo-Inf. Sci. 2016, 18, 1399–1409. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Z.F.; Wang, W.G.; Fu, J.Y. Vegetation response to precipitation anomalies under different climatic and biogeographical conditions in China. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fick, S.E.; Hijmans, R.J. Worldclim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2017, 37, 4302–4315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- NASA; METI. Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Global Digital Elevation Model (V2). Available online: https://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/gdem.asp (accessed on 16 December 2022).
- YPBS. Yunnan Statistical Yearbook. Available online: https://data.cnki.net/yearBook/single?id=N2023010189 (accessed on 13 October 2023).
- SPBS; NBSS. Sichuan Statistical Yearbook. Available online: https://data.cnki.net/yearBook/single?id=N2023030075 (accessed on 13 October 2023).
- GPBS; NBSGST. Gansu Development Yearbook. Available online: https://data.cnki.net/yearBook/single?id=N2023030141 (accessed on 13 October 2023).
- NHARBS; NGITNBS. Ningxia Statistical Yearbook. Available online: https://data.cnki.net/yearBook/single?id=N2023050117 (accessed on 13 October 2023).
- SBIMAR. Inner Mongolia Statistical Yearbook. Available online: https://data.cnki.net/yearBook/single?id=N2022100028 (accessed on 13 October 2023).
- Rosenbaum, P.R.; Rubin, D.B. The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika 1983, 70, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, H.J. Tobler’s First Law and spatial analysis. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2004, 94, 284–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Austin, P.C. A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score. Stat. Med. 2014, 33, 1057–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Becker, S.O.; Ichino, A. Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. Stata J. 2002, 2, 358–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Hu, Z.; Long, R.; Gao, X.; Li, F. The application effect of the project of restoring grassland from over--grazing in Gansu and the ways for its sustainable development. Pratacultural Sci. 2007, 24, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Mu, S.J.; Chen, Y.Z.; Li, J.L.; Ju, W.M.; Odeh, I.O.A.; Zou, X.L. Grassland dynamics in response to climate change and human activities in Inner Mongolia, China between 1985 and 2009. Rangeland J. 2013, 35, 315–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribas, L.G.S.; Pressey, R.L.; Bini, L.M. Estimating counterfactuals for evaluation of ecological and conservation impact: An introduction to matching methods. Biol. Rev. 2021, 96, 1186–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Fan, J.; Shao, Q.; Zhang, Y. Ecosystem dynamics in the ‘Returning Rangeland to Grassland’ programs, China. Acta Prataculturae Sin. 2016, 25, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.M.; Wu, W.Q.; Li, H. The Influence of Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy on Grassland Quality: Evidence from the Perspective of Grassland Ecosystem Vulnerability. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Climate Zoning in China and Data on the Spatial Distribution of 1 Million Vegetation Types in China. Available online: https://www.resdc.cn/Default.aspx (accessed on 12 January 2024).
Province | County | NDVI in 2002 | NDVI in 2010 | ATT |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gansu | Yugur Autonomous County of Sunan | 0.180 | 0.174 | 0.031 |
Gansu | Zhang County | 0.381 | 0.236 | 0.000 |
Gansu | Diebu County | 0.403 | 0.287 | 0.044 |
Gansu | Hezuo City | 0.278 | 0.248 | −0.019 |
Gansu | Zhuoni County | 0.359 | 0.291 | 0.051 |
Gansu | Huan County | 0.165 | 0.206 | −0.017 |
Gansu | Lintan County | 0.355 | 0.233 | 0.002 |
Gansu | Xiahe County | 0.258 | 0.258 | −0.023 |
Gansu | Yongchang County | 0.156 | 0.148 | 0.012 |
Gansu | Minqin County | 0.116 | 0.108 | 0.000 |
Gansu | Tianzhu Zangzu Autonomous County | 0.253 | 0.234 | 0.101 |
Inner Mongolia | Arun Banner | 0.367 | 0.382 | −0.130 |
Inner Mongolia | Genhe City | 0.384 | 0.562 | 0.058 |
Inner Mongolia | Daur Autonomous Banner of Morin Dawa | 0.368 | 0.419 | −0.084 |
Inner Mongolia | Yakeshi City | 0.333 | 0.467 | 0.000 |
Inner Mongolia | Zhalantun City | 0.343 | 0.388 | 0.014 |
Inner Mongolia | Holingola | 0.209 | 0.222 | −0.007 |
Inner Mongolia | Kailu County | 0.168 | 0.203 | −0.016 |
Inner Mongolia | Horqin Northeast County | 0.177 | 0.195 | −0.032 |
Inner Mongolia | Horqin East Middle County | 0.165 | 0.201 | 0.006 |
Inner Mongolia | Kulun Banner | 0.169 | 0.191 | 0.000 |
Inner Mongolia | Naiman Banner | 0.175 | 0.198 | −0.006 |
Inner Mongolia | Jarud Banner | 0.211 | 0.251 | −0.007 |
Inner Mongolia | Horqin Right Wing Front Banner | 0.242 | 0.268 | −0.014 |
Inner Mongolia | Horqin Right Wing Middle Banner | 0.200 | 0.226 | −0.011 |
Inner Mongolia | Tuquan County | 0.189 | 0.262 | 0.034 |
Inner Mongolia | Ulan Hot City | 0.218 | 0.260 | 0.027 |
Inner Mongolia | Jalaid Banner | 0.228 | 0.262 | −0.024 |
Inner Mongolia | Eerguna City | 0.334 | 0.500 | 0.000 |
Inner Mongolia | Urad Front Banner | 0.120 | 0.143 | −0.008 |
Inner Mongolia | Urad Middle Banner | 0.098 | 0.103 | 0.000 |
Inner Mongolia | Otog Front Banner | 0.142 | 0.154 | −0.008 |
Inner Mongolia | Hangjin Banner | 0.107 | 0.125 | 0.000 |
Inner Mongolia | Uxin Banner | 0.124 | 0.155 | 0.000 |
Ningxia | Pengyang County | 0.195 | 0.229 | −0.033 |
Ningxia | Xiji County | 0.191 | 0.190 | 0.004 |
Ningxia | Yuanzhou District | 0.212 | 0.200 | 0.011 |
Ningxia | Jingyuan County | 0.383 | 0.275 | −0.008 |
Ningxia | Yanchi County | 0.136 | 0.148 | −0.026 |
Ningxia | Haiyuan County | 0.162 | 0.154 | 0.013 |
Ningxia | Shapotou District | 0.142 | 0.104 | 0.006 |
Sichuan | Huili City | 0.373 | 0.302 | −0.031 |
Sichuan | Tibetan Autonomous County of Muli | 0.353 | 0.321 | 0.017 |
Sichuan | Yanyuan County | 0.347 | 0.333 | −0.010 |
Sichuan | Jiuzhaigou County | 0.420 | 0.237 | −0.004 |
Sichuan | Kangding City | 0.207 | 0.171 | −0.048 |
Sichuan | Zhaojue County | 0.327 | 0.302 | −0.017 |
Sichuan | Heishui County | 0.233 | 0.174 | −0.031 |
Sichuan | Li County | 0.173 | 0.087 | −0.075 |
Sichuan | Songpan County | 0.342 | 0.218 | 0.017 |
Sichuan | Xiaojin County | 0.199 | 0.161 | −0.051 |
Yunnan | Deqin County | 0.240 | 0.232 | 0.114 |
Yunnan | Weixi Lisu Autonomous County | 0.409 | 0.319 | 0.035 |
Yunnan | Shangri-la City | 0.330 | 0.311 | −0.029 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sun, S.; Niu, J.; Wang, Y.; Yang, H.; Chen, X. Exploring the Heterogeneities in the Impacts of China’s Grassland Ecological Compensation Program. Land 2024, 13, 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13020132
Sun S, Niu J, Wang Y, Yang H, Chen X. Exploring the Heterogeneities in the Impacts of China’s Grassland Ecological Compensation Program. Land. 2024; 13(2):132. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13020132
Chicago/Turabian StyleSun, Shuwei, Jiamei Niu, Yujun Wang, Hongbo Yang, and Xiaodong Chen. 2024. "Exploring the Heterogeneities in the Impacts of China’s Grassland Ecological Compensation Program" Land 13, no. 2: 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13020132
APA StyleSun, S., Niu, J., Wang, Y., Yang, H., & Chen, X. (2024). Exploring the Heterogeneities in the Impacts of China’s Grassland Ecological Compensation Program. Land, 13(2), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13020132