Next Article in Journal
Quantification of Carbon Flux Patterns in Ecosystems: A Case Study of Prince Edward Island
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Soil Nutrient Restoration Aging and Vegetation Recovery in Open Dumps of Cold and Arid Regions in Xinjiang, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Connections and Spatial Network Structure of the Tourism Economy in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei: A Social Network Perspective

1
Business School, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
2
Institute for Cultural and Tourism Development, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2024, 13(10), 1691; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101691
Submission received: 19 September 2024 / Revised: 11 October 2024 / Accepted: 15 October 2024 / Published: 16 October 2024

Abstract

In the context of the coordinated development of Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei, examining the spatial connections and network structure characteristics of the tourism economy holds substantial theoretical and practical significance. This study constructs a tourism economic quality evaluation index system from four dimensions and optimizes the tourism economic gravity model by incorporating time distance and weight factors to dynamically simulate the intensity of tourism economic spatial connection (ITESC). Based on the new perspective of relational data, social network analysis is employed to investigate the spatial correlation network characteristics and group structure changes in the tourism economy within the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei urban agglomeration (BTHUA). The results demonstrate a significant improvement in overall tourism economic quality from 2013 to 2022, with the average quality increasing from 0.128 in 2013 to 0.157 in 2022. Tourism economic spatial connections are prevalent among cities, exhibiting heterogeneous characteristics, characterized by density in the north and relatively sparse in the south. The network cohesion of ITESC strengthens, and the network structure evolves from a highly centralized to a multi-centralized configuration, with increasingly frequent cooperation and interaction in tourism between cities. Beijing, Tianjin, and Shijiazhuang occupy central positions in the network, exhibiting strong ITESC and a high degree of connectivity, generating a significant “trickle-down effect” on peripheral cities. Consequently, strengthening ITESC between peripheral cities and core areas, as well as enhancing the bidirectional spillover of tourism development between cities, is crucial for the future sustainable and coordinated development of tourism in the BTHUA.
Keywords: tourism economy; spatial network structure; gravity model; Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei urban agglomeration; social network analysis tourism economy; spatial network structure; gravity model; Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei urban agglomeration; social network analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Huang, X.; Shi, J.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, J. Connections and Spatial Network Structure of the Tourism Economy in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei: A Social Network Perspective. Land 2024, 13, 1691. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101691

AMA Style

Zhang X, Huang X, Shi J, Zheng Y, Wang J. Connections and Spatial Network Structure of the Tourism Economy in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei: A Social Network Perspective. Land. 2024; 13(10):1691. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101691

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xiaoyuan, Xiankai Huang, Jinlian Shi, Yaomin Zheng, and Jiahong Wang. 2024. "Connections and Spatial Network Structure of the Tourism Economy in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei: A Social Network Perspective" Land 13, no. 10: 1691. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101691

APA Style

Zhang, X., Huang, X., Shi, J., Zheng, Y., & Wang, J. (2024). Connections and Spatial Network Structure of the Tourism Economy in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei: A Social Network Perspective. Land, 13(10), 1691. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101691

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop