Differential Evolution of Farmers’ Livelihood Strategies since the 1980s on the Loess Plateau, China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (1)
- How have FLS evolved?
- (2)
- What are the main factors that have influenced the evolution of FLS?
2. Analytical Framework
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Study Area
3.2. Sampling and Data Collection
3.3. Classification Criteria for FLS
3.4. Binary Logistic Regression Method
4. Results
4.1. Characteristics of Different FLS
4.2. Evolution of FLS
4.2.1. Evolution of FLS in Different Economic Sub-Regions
4.2.2. Evolution of FLS in Different Terrain Sub-Regions
4.2.3. The Evolution Path of FLS
4.3. Factors Influencing FLS Evolution
4.4. Mechanism of the Factors Influencing FLS Evolution
5. Discussion
5.1. The Role of Geographic Location in the Evolution of FLS
5.2. The Role of Livelihood Capital in the Evolution of FLS
5.3. Comparative Analysis with Existing Research Results
5.4. Policy Implications
5.5. Limitations of the Study and Future Research
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Period | Livelihood Capital | Index | Loess Gully Region | Loess Ridge Region | Loess Tableland Region | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Max | Min | Mean | Std | Max | Min | Mean | Std | Max | Min | Mean | Std | |||
2018 | Nature capital | Cultivated land area | 8.50 | 0.50 | 2.05 | 1.55 | 8.00 | 0.40 | 2.47 | 1.81 | 6.50 | 0.17 | 1.48 | 0.95 |
Garden area | 2.50 | 0.00 | 0.38 | 0.56 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 0.62 | 0.47 | ||
Human capital | Labor force | 100.00 | 0.00 | 73.88 | 28.80 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 75.08 | 26.27 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 70.75 | 23.16 | |
Education level | 3.75 | 1.00 | 2.29 | 0.63 | 4.00 | 1.00 | 2.43 | 0.79 | 4.67 | 1.00 | 2.41 | 0.72 | ||
Physical capital | Production and living materials | 10.00 | 1.00 | 5.20 | 1.85 | 9.00 | 2.00 | 6.26 | 1.57 | 10.00 | 1.00 | 6.08 | 1.91 | |
Financial capital | Credit opportunities | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.66 | 0.47 | |
Loan opportunities | 10.00 | 0.00 | 3.75 | 2.61 | 13.00 | 0.00 | 4.13 | 2.89 | 10.00 | 0.00 | 3.99 | 2.38 | ||
Social capital | Social network | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.30 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.34 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.38 | |
Neighborhood trust | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.71 | 0.23 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.80 | 0.16 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.74 | 0.22 | ||
Training opportunities | 5.00 | 0.00 | 0.63 | 1.04 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 0.62 | 0.94 | 8.00 | 0.00 | 1.49 | 1.58 | ||
2010 | Nature capital | Cultivated land area | 8.50 | 0.50 | 1.69 | 1.17 | 6.67 | 0.30 | 2.40 | 1.64 | 4.33 | 0.17 | 1.34 | 0.77 |
Garden area | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.30 | 0.40 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.36 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 0.59 | 0.45 | ||
Human capital | Labor force | 100.00 | 25.00 | 67.24 | 24.03 | 100.00 | 20.00 | 66.73 | 21.15 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 64.92 | 21.65 | |
Education level | 4.58 | 0.52 | 1.96 | 0.79 | 3.75 | 0.88 | 2.06 | 0.77 | 4.23 | 0.41 | 2.06 | 0.73 | ||
Physical capital | Production and living materials | 9.00 | 0.00 | 3.37 | 1.71 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 3.62 | 1.35 | 8.00 | 1.00 | 3.69 | 1.48 | |
Financial capital | Credit opportunities | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 0.45 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.74 | 0.44 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 0.45 | |
Loan opportunities | 10.00 | 0.00 | 3.77 | 2.55 | 13.00 | 0.00 | 3.62 | 2.57 | 10.00 | 0.00 | 3.79 | 2.32 | ||
Social capital | Social network | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.30 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.31 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.37 | |
Neighborhood trust | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.73 | 0.20 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.78 | 0.20 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.21 | ||
Training opportunities | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 0.79 | 5.00 | 0.00 | 0.56 | 1.12 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.21 | ||
2000 | Nature capital | Cultivated land area | 8.50 | 0.50 | 1.69 | 1.18 | 6.67 | 0.30 | 2.41 | 1.64 | 4.20 | 0.17 | 1.31 | 0.89 |
Garden area | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.40 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.36 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.64 | 0.49 | ||
Human capital | Labor force | 100.00 | 25.00 | 67.38 | 23.71 | 100.00 | 20.00 | 66.73 | 21.15 | 100.00 | 33.33 | 62.49 | 23.05 | |
Education level | 3.64 | 0.39 | 1.49 | 0.64 | 2.86 | 0.40 | 1.48 | 0.58 | 2.45 | 0.53 | 1.59 | 0.47 | ||
Physical capital | Production and living materials | 7.00 | 0.00 | 2.52 | 1.31 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 2.69 | 1.36 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 2.62 | 0.82 | |
Financial capital | Credit opportunities | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.63 | 0.49 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 0.46 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.62 | 0.49 | |
Loan opportunities | 8.00 | 0.00 | 3.65 | 2.22 | 13.00 | 0.00 | 3.62 | 2.51 | 10.00 | 1.00 | 3.65 | 1.91 | ||
Social capital | Social network | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.30 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.27 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.39 | |
Neighborhood trust | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 0.22 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.81 | 0.18 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.76 | 0.19 | ||
Training opportunities | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.77 | 5.00 | 0.00 | 0.56 | 0.99 | 3.00 | 0.00 | 0.62 | 0.95 | ||
1990 | Nature capital | Cultivated land area | 8.50 | 0.57 | 1.72 | 1.17 | 6.67 | 0.33 | 2.52 | 1.54 | 6.00 | 0.17 | 1.40 | 0.88 |
Garden area | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 0.41 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.47 | ||
Human capital | Labor force | 100.00 | 25.00 | 66.87 | 24.07 | 100.00 | 25.00 | 68.47 | 23.19 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 62.57 | 22.13 | |
Education level | 3.00 | 0.20 | 1.21 | 0.51 | 2.50 | 0.67 | 1.42 | 0.50 | 6.33 | 0.25 | 1.41 | 0.65 | ||
Physical capital | Production and living materials | 4.00 | 0.00 | 1.52 | 0.95 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 1.69 | 0.83 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 1.65 | 0.88 | |
Financial capital | Credit opportunities | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.67 | 0.48 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.57 | 0.50 | |
Loan opportunities | 10.00 | 0.00 | 3.25 | 2.45 | 13.00 | 0.00 | 2.67 | 2.59 | 10.00 | 0.00 | 2.96 | 2.50 | ||
Social capital | Social network | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.18 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.27 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.33 | |
Neighborhood trust | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.21 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.79 | 0.18 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.76 | 0.21 | ||
Training opportunities | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.32 | 0.70 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 0.47 | 5.00 | 0.00 | 0.54 | 0.96 |
Livelihood Strategy Type | Period | Model Chi-Square | Model p Value | Nagelkerke R-Square |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crop-planting livelihood strategy (CPLS) | 1990 | 39.133 | 0.000 | 0.258 |
2000 | 41.341 | 0.000 | 0.308 | |
2018 | 22.124 | 0.036 | 0.383 | |
Apple-planting livelihood strategy (APLS) | 1990 | 39.133 | 0.000 | 0.298 |
2000 | 59.016 | 0.000 | 0.305 | |
2010 | 63.063 | 0.000 | 0.331 | |
2018 | 52.521 | 0.000 | 0.388 | |
Work-oriented livelihood strategy (WOLS) | 2000 | 37.068 | 0.000 | 0.297 |
2010 | 53.874 | 0.000 | 0.277 | |
2018 | 54.078 | 0.000 | 0.281 | |
Part-time comprehensive livelihood strategy (PTLS) | 2000 | 39.133 | 0.000 | 0.258 |
2018 | 25.976 | 0.011 | 0.159 |
References
- Chambers, R.; Conway, G.R. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century; IDS Discussion Paper No. 296; Institute of Development Studies: Brighton, UK, 1992; Available online: https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/20.500.12413/3390/Wp72.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 27 December 2021).
- DFID. Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets; Department for International Development: London, UK, 2000.
- Scoones, I. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis; IDS Working Paper 72; Institute of Development Studies: Brighton, UK, 1998; Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251873585_Sustainable_Rural_Livelihoods_A_Framework_for_Analysis (accessed on 27 December 2021).
- Daovisan, H.; Promphakping, B.; Chamaratana, T. Selling labor-domain livelihood assets: A qualitative approach to non-subcontracting home-based garment workers in the Lao PDR. Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci. 2019, 40, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerlitz, J.Y.; Macchi, M.; Brooks, N.; Pandey, R.; Banerjee, P.; Jha, S.K. The multidimensional livelihood vulnerability index—An instrument to measure livelihood vulnerability to change in the hindu kush Himalayas. Clim. Dev. 2017, 9, 124–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jampel, C. Cattle-based livelihoods, changes in the taskscape, and human-bear conflict in the Ecuadorian Andes. Geoforum 2016, 69, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oberlack, C.; Tejada, L.; Messerli, P.; Rist, S.; Giger, M. Sustainable livelihoods in the global land rush? Archetypes of livelihood vulnerability and sustainability potentials. Glob. Environ. Change 2016, 41, 153–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Singh, R.K.; Zander, K.K.; Kumar, S.; Singh, A.; Sheoran, P.; Kumar, A.; Hussain, S.M.; Riba, T.; Rallen, O.; Lego, Y.J.; et al. Perceptions of climate variability and livelihood adaptations relating to gender and wealth among the Adi community of the Eastern Indian Himalayas. Appl. Geogr. 2017, 86, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babulo, B.; Muys, B.; Nega, F.; Tollens, E.; Nyssen, J.; Deckers, J.; Mathijs, E. Household livelihood strategies and forest dependence in the highlands of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Agric. Syst. 2008, 98, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dovie, B.D.K.; Witkowskia, E.T.F.; Shackleton, C. Direct-use value of smallholder crop production in a semi-arid rural South African village. Agric. Syst. 2003, 76, 337–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steenbergen, D.J.; Marlessy, C.; Holle, E. Effects of rapid livelihood transitions: Examining local co-developed change following a seaweed farming boom. Mar. Policy 2017, 82, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrett, C.B.; Reardon, T.; Webb, P. Nonfarm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa: Concepts, dynamics, and policy implications. Food Policy 2001, 26, 315–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellis, F. Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. J. Dev. Stud. 1998, 35, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olusola, A.A.; Adenegan, K.O. Rural livelihood in south-west Nigeria: Strategies, assets ownerships and the non-farm income. Res. J. Appl. Sci. 2012, 6, 344–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jiao, X.; Pouliot, M.; Walelign, S.Z. Livelihood Strategies and Dynamics in Rural Cambodia. World Dev. 2017, 97, 266–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adepoju, A.O.; Obayelu, O.A. Livelihood diversification and welfare of rural households in Ondo State, Nigeria. J. Dev. Agric. Econ. 2013, 5, 482–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khatiwada, S.P.; Deng, W.; Paudel, B.; Khatiwada, J.R.; Zhang, J.F.; Su, Y. Household livelihood strategies and implication for poverty reduction in rural areas of central Nepal. Sustainability 2017, 9, 612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mengistu, D.; Haji, J. Factors affecting the choices of coping strategies for climate extremes: The case of Yabello District, Borana Zone, Oromia National Regional State, Ethiopia. Sci. Res. 2015, 3, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Robaa, B.; Tolossa, D. Rural livelihood diversification and its effects on household food security: A case study at Damota Gale Woreda, Wolayta, Southern Ethiopia. East. Afr. Soc. Sci. Res. Rev. 2016, 32, 93–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siraj, M.; Khan, H. Impact of micro hydropower projects on household income, expenditure and diversification of livelihood strategies in Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Pak. Dev. Rev. 2019, 58, 45–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ho, T.D.N.; Tsusaka, T.W.; Kuwornu, J.K.M.; Datta, A.; Nguyen, L.T. Do rice varieties matter? Climate change adaptation and livelihood diversification among rural smallholder households in the Mekong Delta region of Vietnam. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 2022, 27, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nambeye, E.; Mubanga, K.H. The Failure of Common Farming Systems in Promoting Livelihood Diversification and Food Sufficiency among Smallholder Farmers: Evidence from Choma, Zambia. In Opportunities and Challenges of Smallholders and Smallholding; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 183–214. [Google Scholar]
- Tukela, B.; Rao, C.A.; Rambabu, K. Analysis of Livelihood Diversification Practice on Reduction of Rural Poverty: The Case of Hawassa Zuria Woreda of Sidama Region, Ethiopia. Int. J. All Res. Educ. Sci. Methods 2021, 9, 799–808. [Google Scholar]
- Siqin, C.K.T.; Fang, Y.G.; Wang, H.; Xu, K. Household-livelihood Assets and Strategies in Farming-pastoral Region: The Case of Shuangyushu Gaqa, Inner Mongolia. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 2017, 37, 1095–1103. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walelign, S.Z. Livelihood strategies, environmental dependency and rural poverty: The case of two villages in rural Mozambique. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2016, 18, 593–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chand, R. Labour migration as a livelihood strategy in far east Bhutan: A case study of a marginal Bhutanese Community. Hrvat. Geogr. Glas. 2014, 75, 41–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martina, R.; Linstadter, A.; Frank, K.; Müller, B. Livelihood security in face of drought—Assessing the vulnerability of pastoral households. Environ. Model. Softw. 2016, 75, 414–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olsen, C.S.; Larsen, H.O. Alpine medicinal plant trade and Himalayan mountain livelihood strategies. Geogr. J. 2003, 169, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oostenbrugge, J.A.E.V.; Densen, W.L.T.V.; Machiels, M.A.M. How the uncertain outcomes associated with aquatic and land resource use affect livelihood strategies in coastal communities in the Central Moluccas, Indonesia. Agric. Syst. 2004, 82, 57–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, C.; Sasaki, N.; Jourdain, D.; Kim, S.M.; Shivakoti, P.G. Local livelihood under different governances of tourism development in China–A case study of Huangshan mountain area. Tour. Manag. 2017, 61, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toillier, A.; Serpantié, G.; Hervé, D.; Lardon, S. Livelihood strategies and land use changes in response to conservation: Pitfalls of community-based forest management in Madagascar. J. Sustain. For. 2011, 30, 20–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chibinga, O.; Musimba, M.; Nyangito, M.; Simbaya, J.; Moses, D. Climate Variability impact on Livelihood Strategies among Agro-Pastoralists in Southern Zambia. Agriculture 2021, 1, 25–29. [Google Scholar]
- Tesfaye, Y.; Roos, A.; Campbell, B.M.; Bohlin, F. Livelihood strategies and the role of forest income in participatory-managed forests of Dodola area in the bale highlands, southern Ethiopia. For. Policy Econ. 2011, 13, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raihan, F.; Milon, M. Livelihood vulnerability assessments and adaptation strategies to climate change: A case study in Tanguar haor, Sylhet. J. Water Clim. Change 2021, 12, 3448–3463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mulatie, C.; Timkete, A. Internal migration, rural livelihood strategies and sustainable forest management: Evidence from Bench Maji, Kaffa and Sheka Zones, South West Ethiopia. Environ. Socio-Econ. Stud. 2021, 9, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Q.; Bennett, S.J.; Xu, Y.; Li, Y. Agricultural practices and sustainable livelihoods: Rural transformation within the Loess Plateau, China. Appl. Geogr. 2013, 41, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Z.; Zhao, L.; Wang, S.Y.; Zhang, H.Y.; Wang, X.Y.; Wan, Z.Y. Targeted Poverty Alleviation and Households’ Livelihood Strategy in a Relation-Based Society: Evidence from Northeast China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mondal, M.R. Tourism as a livelihood development strategy: A study of Tarapith Temple Town, West Bengal. Asia-Pac. J. Reg. Sci. 2020, 4, 795–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Yin, S.; Gebhard, H.; Yang, X.J. Farmers’ livelihood adaptation to environmental change in an arid region: A case study of the Minqin Oasis, northwestern China. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 93, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, Y.P.; Fan, J.; Shen, M.Y.; Song, M.Q. Sensitivity of livelihood strategy to livelihood capital in mountain areas: Empirical analysis based on different settlements in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River, China. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 38, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.Y.; Liu, J.H.; Wang, W.J.; Lan, H.X.; Ma, P.Y.; Du, Y.X. Livelihood sustainability and livelihood intervention of out-of-poverty farming households in poor mountainous areas: A case of Longnan mountainous area. Prog. Geogr. 2020, 39, 982–995. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mutabazi, K.D.; Amjath-Babu, T.S.; Sieber, S. Influence of livelihood resources on adaptive strategies to enhance climatic resilience of farm households in Morogoro, Tanzania: An indicator-based analysis. Reg. Environ. Change 2015, 15, 1259–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salimah, N.; Muflikhati, I. Family capitals, livelihood strategies, and family well-being of plantation worker. J. Fam. Sci. 2016, 1, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bebbington, A. Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Dev. 1999, 27, 2021–2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koczberski, G.; Curry, G.N. Making a living: Land pressures and changing livelihood strategies among oil palm settlers in Papua New Guinea. Agric. Syst. 2005, 85, 324–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khosla, S.; Jena, P.R. Switch in livelihood strategies and social capital have a role to play in deciding rural poverty dynamics: Evidence from panel data analysis from Eastern India. J. Asian Afr. Stud. 2020, 55, 76–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuang, F.Y.; Jin, J.J.; He, R.; Wan, X.Y.; Ning, J. Influence of livelihood capital on adaptation strategies: Evidence from rural households in Wushen Banner, China. Land Use Policy 2019, 89, 104228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Longpichai, O.; Perret, S.R.; Shivakoti, G.P. Role of livelihood capital in shaping the farming strategies and outcomes of smallholder rubber producers in southern thailand. Outlook Agric. 2012, 41, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rakodi, C. A capital assets framework for analysing household livelihood strategies: Implications for policy. Dev. Policy Rev. 1999, 17, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuliati, Y.; Isaskar, R. Social capital and sustainable livelihood strategies in downstream area of Bengawan Solo River, East Java, Indonesia. J. Sustain. Sci. Manag. 2018, 13, 201–209. [Google Scholar]
- He, R.W.; Fang, F.; Liu, Y.W. Influence of human capital on the livelihood strategy of farming households in poor mountainous areas: A case study of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture of Sichuan. China. Prog. Geogr. 2019, 38, 1282–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adam, Y.O.; Pretzsch, J.; Pettenella, D. Contribution of Non-Timber Forest Products livelihood strategies to rural development in drylands of Sudan: Potentials and failures. Agric. Syst. 2013, 117, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nath, S.; Laerhoven, F.V.; Driessen, P.; Nadiruzzaman, M. Capital, rules or conflict? Factors affecting livelihood-strategies, infrastructure-resilience, and livelihood-vulnerability in the polders of Bangladesh. Sustain. Sci. 2020, 15, 1169–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malherbe, W.; Sauer, W.; Aswani, S. Social capital reduces vulnerability in rural coastal communities of Solomon Islands. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2020, 191, 105186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.P.; Huo, X.X.; Peng, C.H.; Qiu, H.G.; Shangguan, Z.P.; Chang, C.; Huai, J. Complementary livelihood capital as a means to enhance adaptive capacity: A case of the Loess Plateau, China. Glob. Environ. Change 2017, 47, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nolan, S.; Unkovich, M.; Shen, Y.Y.; Li, L.L.; Bellotti, W. Farming systems of the Loess Plateau, Gansu Province, China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 124, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, B.; Parnwell, M.; Bradley, P. Farmer self-organizing innovation in the marginal areas of China: A study of farmer communication networks in Zhidan, Loess Plateau. J. Rural Coop. 2002, 30, 43–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhen, N.H.; Fu, B.J.; Lü, Y.H.; Zheng, Z.M. Changes of livelihood due to land use shifts: A case study of Yanchang County in the Loess Plateau of China. Land Use Policy 2014, 40, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frankenberger, T.R.; Drinkwate, M.; Maxwell, D. Operational Household Livelihood Security: A Holistic Approach for Addressing Poverty and Vulnerability. 2000. Available online: http://mkatherinemccaston.com/PDF/operationalizing_household_livelihood_security.pdf (accessed on 27 December 2021).
- Krantz, L. The Sustainable Livelihood Approach to Poverty Reduction; Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency: Stockholm, Sweden, 2001; pp. 42–98. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, D.M.; Yang, X.J.; Shi, Y.Z.; Wang, Z.Q. Rural regime shifts and transformation development on the Loess Plateau. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2020, 75, 348–364. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Q.Q.; Yang, X.J.; Gao, Y.H. Change in vulnerability of rural human settlement in the semi-arid area of the Loess Plateau since 1980: A case study of Jiaxian County, Shaanxi Province. Prog. Geogr. 2019, 38, 756–771. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, B.; Xie, T.; Subrahmanyam, M.V. The impact of china’s grain for green program on rural economy and precipitation: A case study of yan river basin in the loess plateau. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, B.; Wu, P.; Zhao, X.; Gao, X.; Shi, Y. Assessing the spatial and temporal variation of the rainwater harvesting potential (1971–2010) on the chinese loess plateau using the vic model. Hydrol. Process. 2014, 28, 534–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.Q.; Shi, C.P.; Jiang, W.; Yang, X.J. Rural transformation from the perspective of regime shifts of socio-ecological systems in the Loess Plateau: A case study of Hongjia town in Changwu county, China. Geogr. Res. 2016, 35, 1510–1524. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wamalwa, F.; Ondieki-Mwaura, F.; Ayuke, F. The Influence of Household Assets on Livelihood Choices in Kieni Sub Counties, Kenya. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. Res. 2021, 6, 20–31. [Google Scholar]
- Baruah, D.; Singh, N.D. Methodologies for Livelihood Support through Fish Farming at High Altitudes of Arunachal Pradesh. J. Krishi Vigyan 2017, 5, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jairu, D.; Acharya, S.K. Impact of Altitude on the Livelihood of the Tea Garden Workers of North Bengal. Asian J. Agric. Ext. Econ. Sociol. 2020, 38, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonye, S.Z.; Aasoglenang, T.A.; Yiridomoh, G.Y. Urbanization, agricultural land use change and livelihood adaptation strategies in peri-urban Wa, Ghana Background to the study. SN Soc. Sci. 2021, 1, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kehinde, A.L.; Alao, O.T.; Busari, A.O.; Oyaromade, R. Climate Change, Cost of Providing Water and Livelihood Diversification by Arable Crop Farmers in Nigeria. Niger. J. Agric. Econ. 2020, 10, 92–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boncinelli, F.; Bartolini, F.; Casini, L.; Brunori, G. On farm non-agricultural activities: Geographical determinants of diversification and intensification strategy. Lett. Spat. Resour. Sci. 2017, 10, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lay, J.; Mahmoud, T.O.; M’Mukaria, G.M. Few Opportunities, Much Desperation: The Dichotomy of Non-Agricultural Activities and Inequality in Western Kenya. World Dev. 2008, 36, 2713–2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Livelihood Strategies | Livelihood Activity Portfolio | Income Structure |
---|---|---|
Crop-planting livelihood strategy (CPLS) | Crop cultivation and other activities | Income from crop cultivation accounts for more than 50% of the total annual household income. |
Apple-planting livelihood strategy (APLS) | Apple cultivation and other activities | Income from apple cultivation accounts for more than 50% of the total annual household income. |
Work-oriented livelihood strategy (WOLS) | Non-agricultural work and other activities | Income from non-agricultural work accounts for more than 50% of the total annual household income. |
Part-time comprehensive livelihood strategy (PTLS) | Crop and apple cultivation, non-agricultural work, and other activities | Family engaged in at least two livelihood activities, and the proportion of the family’s total annual income from each livelihood activity is not more than 50%. |
Dimension | Variable | Description |
---|---|---|
Geographic location | Economic location | According to the industrial layout and economic development of Changwu County, the economic areas can be divided into the economic fringe region and economic core region: economic fringe region = 1, economic core region = 2. |
Terrain location | The terrain of Changwu County is mainly divided into three types: loess ridge, loess tableland, and loess gully, and the values were assigned according to the quality of the regional agricultural production conditions: loess gully region = 1, loess ridge region = 2, loess tableland region = 3. | |
Natural capital | Cultivated land area | Per capita cultivated area: the ratio of actual cultivated area to the total number of household members. |
Garden area | Per capita garden area: the ratio of actual garden area to the total number of household members. | |
Human capital | Labor force | The proportion of laborers per household: the ratio of laborers (16–65 years old) to total household members. |
Education level | Per capita years of education: the ratio of total years of family education to the total number of household members. | |
Physical capital | Production and living materials | The number of main production and living tools owned by a household selected by the farmer from the questionnaire. |
Financial capital | Credit opportunities | Binary variable representing bank lending opportunities according to whether a bank loan can be obtained: yes = 1, no = 0. |
Loan opportunities | The number of people who can lend the family money. | |
Social capital | Social network | Binary variable representing whether someone in the family works in a government department: yes = 1, no = 0. |
Neighborhood trust | Trust in neighbors on a five-point scale. | |
Training opportunities | The level of production skills training that farmers can receive. |
Livelihood Strategies | Period | Independent Variable | Regression Coefficient (B) | Standard Error (SE) | Wald | Significance (Sig) | Odds Ratio Exp (B) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPLS | 1990 | Training opportunity | −0.872 | 0.218 | 16.038 | 0.000 | 0.418 |
2000 | Garden area | −1.629 | 0.676 | 5.815 | 0.016 | 0.196 | |
Production and living materials | −0.709 | 0.257 | 7.588 | 0.006 | 0.492 | ||
Loan opportunities | −0.273 | 0.127 | 4.639 | 0.031 | 0.761 | ||
2018 | Cultivated land area | 0.796 | 0.392 | 4.116 | 0.042 | 2.216 | |
Economic location | −2.328 | 1.138 | 4.185 | 0.041 | 0.097 | ||
APLS | 1990 | Training opportunities | 0.872 | 0.218 | 16.038 | 0.000 | 2.392 |
2000 | Garden area | 1.752 | 0.473 | 13.726 | 0.000 | 5.764 | |
Training opportunities | 0.578 | 0.181 | 10.188 | 0.001 | 1.783 | ||
2010 | Garden area | 2.268 | 0.514 | 19.454 | 0.000 | 9.659 | |
Training opportunities | 0.404 | 0.150 | 7.286 | 0.007 | 1.498 | ||
2018 | Garden area | 1.972 | 0.581 | 11.521 | 0.001 | 7.187 | |
Education level | −0.882 | 0.368 | 5.740 | 0.017 | 0.414 | ||
Loan opportunities | 0.228 | 0.109 | 4.351 | 0.037 | 1.256 | ||
Terrain location | 0.564 | 0.385 | 2.140 | 0.014 | 1.758 | ||
WOLS | 2000 | Training opportunities | −0.575 | 0.192 | 8.936 | 0.003 | 0.563 |
2010 | Garden area | −1.407 | 0.436 | 10.418 | 0.001 | 0.245 | |
Training opportunities | −0.407 | 0.148 | 7.509 | 0.006 | 0.666 | ||
Economic location | 0.536 | 0.324 | 2.738 | 0.009 | 1.709 | ||
2018 | Cultivated land area | −0.570 | 0.162 | 12.368 | 0.000 | 0.565 | |
Garden area | −0.974 | 0.404 | 5.796 | 0.016 | 0.378 | ||
Terrain location | −0.453 | 0.210 | 4.677 | 0.031 | 0.636 | ||
PTLS | 2000 | Training opportunities | −0.872 | 0.218 | 16.038 | 0.000 | 0.418 |
2018 | Cultivated land area | 0.319 | 0.134 | 5.705 | 0.017 | 1.376 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wu, K.; Yang, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Z. Differential Evolution of Farmers’ Livelihood Strategies since the 1980s on the Loess Plateau, China. Land 2022, 11, 157. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020157
Wu K, Yang X, Zhang J, Wang Z. Differential Evolution of Farmers’ Livelihood Strategies since the 1980s on the Loess Plateau, China. Land. 2022; 11(2):157. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020157
Chicago/Turabian StyleWu, Kongsen, Xinjun Yang, Jian Zhang, and Ziqiao Wang. 2022. "Differential Evolution of Farmers’ Livelihood Strategies since the 1980s on the Loess Plateau, China" Land 11, no. 2: 157. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020157
APA StyleWu, K., Yang, X., Zhang, J., & Wang, Z. (2022). Differential Evolution of Farmers’ Livelihood Strategies since the 1980s on the Loess Plateau, China. Land, 11(2), 157. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020157