Next Article in Journal
Investigating the Impacts of Urbanization on Vegetation Net Primary Productivity: A Case Study of Chengdu–Chongqing Urban Agglomeration from the Perspective of Townships
Next Article in Special Issue
Estimating the Economic Value of Change in Ecosystem Habitat Quality in South Korea Using an Integrated Environmental and Economic Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluating Agricultural Extension Agent’s Sustainable Cotton Land Production Competencies: Subject Matter Discrepancies Restricting Farmers’ Information Adoption
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Stakeholders’ Perceptions towards Land Restoration and Its Impacts on Ecosystem Services: A Case Study in the Chinese Loess Plateau

Land 2022, 11(11), 2076; https://doi.org/10.3390/land11112076
by Hao Chen 1,2,3, Luuk Fleskens 2, Simon W. Moolenaar 4, Coen J. Ritsema 2 and Fei Wang 1,3,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Land 2022, 11(11), 2076; https://doi.org/10.3390/land11112076
Submission received: 25 October 2022 / Revised: 14 November 2022 / Accepted: 15 November 2022 / Published: 18 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrating Ecosystem Service Assessments into Land Use Decisions)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Detailed comments can be found in the attached annotated PDF.

Overall, I think this kind of reflection on the perceptions of changes to land use policy is incredibly valuable and your results should be shared. I have concerns, however, with the detailed quantitative assessment and number of groups studied. Some groups have fewer than ten observations and i would strongly advise aggregation, e.g. famer vs. non-farmer before you perform such detailed testing for relationships. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

1. This research report and the authors´analysis adds to existing studies of the Chinese Loess plateau restoration efforts by contributing evidence of the value of seeking and evaluating stakeholders´ assessments of past interventions as well as for planning future interventions. 

I found the section on "existing issues and recommendations" to be a very valuable addition to the analysis of stakeholder responses. It provided more context as well.  The discussion of tree species and the photos was also essential for all readers to understand the situation. 

2. There are some odd uses of English that should be corrected by a style editor. 

For example, line 451 - are admitted..

 

that these impacts are admitted by local stakeholders.

for example, the use of "Literally" (line 475) is jarringly out of place , as though a person is making an opinion while speaking:

"Literally, in our study, govern- 475 ment officers in Yan’an area tended to be overly optimistic in comparison to other stake- 476 holder groups and even ignored common facts."

Please provide a definition of "ecological forest"  ,line 496.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop