Effective Communication and Campground Recycling: Lessons Learned from Yosemite, Grand Teton, and Denali National Parks
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Dear editor of Land,
It should be necessary that a reviewer with more experience in the analysis carried out (Bartlett’s test of sphericity…) perform a detailed revision of this part. The tables do not seem easy to understand…
Other comments to the authors are the following:
Sometimes e.g. is written without comma after point. Please check, all of them must be written with comma: e.g., (and the same for i.e.,)
The figure 1 is good, but is too general. I would add a more detailed map for each park in the same figure: A) General view, B) Detailed view of…
The table 4 shows different font size please use the same.
In figure 3, it would be appropriate to put a detail of the posters under each image and add A, B and C…
IMPORTANT: There is no conclusion section?? Please, add concussions
The references must be checked, each “DOI” is written in a different way (cursive…), I think that the editors add a [CrossRef] in each case.
Other comments or corrections are highlighted and commented in the attached PDF.
Thank you,
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
|
Reviewer 1 Suggestions |
Author Responses |
|
Sometimes e.g. is written without comma after point. Please check, all of them must be written with comma: e.g., (and the same for i.e.,) |
Corrected throughout. |
|
The figure 1 is good, but is too general. I would add a more detailed map for each park in the same figure: A) General view, B) Detailed view of… |
We have revised Figure 1 to include maps of all three of the National Park units used in this study. |
|
The table 4 shows different font size please use the same. |
Corrected. |
|
In figure 3, it would be appropriate to put a detail of the posters under each image and add A, B and C… |
We have added detail to the figure, including the messages used in each condition. |
|
IMPORTANT: There is no conclusion section?? Please, add concussions |
We have added a Conclusion. |
|
The references must be checked, each “DOI” is written in a different way (cursive…), I think that the editors add a [CrossRef] in each case. |
We have corrected the DOI citations throughout with hyperlinks where available. |
|
Other comments or corrections are highlighted and commented in the attached PDF. |
All comments in the PDF were addressed and revised in the new version of the submission. |
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
This paper explores how to raise awareness of visitors of national parks in US about the importance of proper waste disposal. The study consists of two parts - survey which provides an adequate way of creating messages to the visitors and quasi-experimental part which explores the effects of these messages. I believe that this is a valuable research that brings something new and interesting to the topic of waste management. It is easy to follow and straightforward in its contribution.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer, we sincerely appreciate your review, and we are encouraged by your comments. We agree with you comments and we are hopeful that this paper can be worthy of publication in the near future.
We have made some additional points of clarity, adding details to figures and adding a Conclusion.
Thank you again for your time and consideration.
