Next Article in Journal
Topology, Vegetation and Stratigraphy of Far Eastern Aapa Mires (Khabarovsk Region, Russia)
Next Article in Special Issue
Factors Influencing the Formalization of Rural Land Transactions in Ethiopia: A Theory of Planned Behavior Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Residents’ Perceptions of Sustainable Tourism Destination Recovery: The Case of Northern Cyprus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Applying SBM-GPA Model to Explore Urban Land Use Efficiency Considering Ecological Development in China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Participatory Landscape Design and Water Management—A Sustainable Strategy for Renovation of Vernacular Baths and Landscape Protection in Szeklerland, Romania

Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art Budapest, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences—MATE, Villányi út 35-43, 1118 Budapest, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2022, 11(1), 95; https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010095
Submission received: 20 December 2021 / Revised: 4 January 2022 / Accepted: 5 January 2022 / Published: 7 January 2022

Abstract

:
Szeklerland is a historical-ethnic region located on the eastern border of the Carpathian Basin, in the central region of Romania. In Szeklerland, thanks to its varied topography and a network of small settlements, landscape management is still carried out using traditional methods. Szeklerland is a macro-region rich in natural resources. Among its natural treasures, the mineral water springs with healing properties are of particular importance: around 40 percent of Romania’s mineral water resources are found here. This richness in hydrogeological features is due to the fact that the post-volcanic activities in the young tertiary mountain ranges in the region still produce large quantities of carbon dioxide, which dissolves beneficial minerals from the earth. When dissolved in water, these minerals produce mineral waters that can be used to cure various types of diseases. For centuries, the medicinal properties of the mineral waters of Szeklerland have been regularly used by the local population. In addition to their consumption, small and larger vernacular baths were built in the settlements with medicinal springs, and their regular use led to the development of a traditional, local cold-water bathing culture in the region. However, the vernacular baths were destroyed in the world wars, and their traditional use was abolished by the apparatus of the 20th century communist regime, which had no respect to natural and cultural heritage. After the political change in 1989, the attention of the society turned back to tradition and values. Alongside (or as part of) nature and landscape conservation initiatives, the reinterpretation and restoration of the intangible and practical values of vernacular baths in Szeklerland also began. Over the past decades, the renovation of vernacular baths, which started as a professional–civic initiative, has grown into an independent heritage conservation programme: dozens of vernacular baths have been renovated in Szeklerland over the past twenty years with public participation initiated and led by professionals. In the course of the renovations, baths used by local communities have been rebuilt using nature- and environment-friendly techniques, materials and in a way that they are also related to the physical environment and the mythology of the region. The project has won prestigious awards both in Romania and internationally, and has become a successful and exemplary movement in landscape heritage conservation.

1. Introduction

The nature-based land use in Szeklerland is the result of the traditional coexistence of man and nature, and the close relationship between communities and the landscape. The complex geofactors have created a distinctive and unique landscape potential in the region. Due to the isolated geographical location of the area, it has been mostly peripheral to economic development and innovation over the centuries, and modernisation processes have been delayed. Hence the forms of land use resulting from this isolation are rational, based almost exclusively on internal resources that are renewable and sustainable. The archaic Szekler landscape has become a model for the conservation of natural and cultural heritage. Natural resources and traditional land use remain the basis for landscape development strategies in the region, with the varied and multipurpose use of medicinal mineral springs as a key pillar [1,2,3].
The use of mineral waters for various treatments is probably as old as humanity. Hydrotherapy is one of the basic methods of treatment widely used in natural medicine, also called as water therapy, aquatic therapy, pool therapy, and balneotherapy. Use of water in various forms and of various temperatures can produce different effects on different systems of the body [4,5,6,7]. The strategic renovation of the vernacular baths in Szeklerland will help to continue and develop this tradition.

1.1. The Landscape

The area of Szeklerland is 12,450 km2, its geographical borders are shown in Figure 1. In terms of its topography, it consists of a varied mixture of lowland, upland and highland landscapes, where the mountainous structural and relief elements have a prominent role [8].
The varied landscape is the result of less than 40,000 years of volcanic activity, which has created a highly fragmented surface morphology, which is difficult to navigate [10,11]. Its varied geology, picturesque rock formations, karstic features, rich network of rivers and streams, extensive forests and subalpine regions are characteristic components of its picturesque landscape. No wonder that from the 18th century there have been a stream of descriptions and travelogues depicting the natural beauty of the landscape, from both the figures of Hungarian literature and sciences [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21] and several Western European travellers [22,23,24,25].
Based on the complex spatial and aesthetic experience in landscape perception, Szeklerland meets the definition of cultural heritage of the European Landscape Convention [26]. It has preserved its natural treasures and features and also bears the marks of the man who cultivated the landscape, with the spiritual legacy of the community that lived in it.
Centuries of traditional farming have created a characteristic landscape and settlement pattern in Szeklerland. The topography, hydrography, climate and biogeography of the area have created the special spatial position and internal structure of the settlements and the farming systems (in the mountains mainly livestock farming, forestry, terraced farming, traditional property patterns, allotments, hedgerows). More than two thirds of the settlements are located in the spring areas, along river valleys and on valley terraces.
Larger villages with extensive agricultural land have developed on the edges of the basins, while small villages and hamlets are located along smaller rivers and streams [27].
The villages were based on the “tens”, which, in accordance with the military way of life, represented the smallest unit of the army and the related families into a highly rational form of settlement, which can still be detected in mental mapping today [28].
This specific landscape pattern forms the basis of a heterogeneous but well-managed landscape heritage, which is partly the result of agriculture and partly of mountain livestock farming. Linked to the latter is the system of dual place of living, a practice which has now disappeared from European land use. In keeping with the rhythm of the year, the animals are driven out to the mountain pastures on St. George’s Day (24 April) and then back to the village stables on St. Michael’s Day (29 September) at the beginning of autumn.
With the development of the “tens” and the increase in population, more and more remote and steeper areas had to be farmed. The new pastures were created by clearing the forest, and in the areas ploughed perpendicular to the slope, formed by centuries of ploughing, agricultural terraces without retaining walls had been gradually developed [29,30,31,32,33]. With the emigration of the population (already in the 19th century) and the decline of agriculture, the agricultural terraces were once again used as hayfields, which nevertheless retained their terraced character, giving the local character of the hillsides.
Regarding landscape aesthetics, the cultivated mosaic parcels of land are also dominant features [34,35,36,37]. In the (periodically redistributed) allotment system of land, which originated from community land ownership, it was inconceivable that vast monocultural plantations could be established. Individual families cultivated their land according to their own needs and ideas, creating a diverse, mosaic landscape, the aesthetic appearance of which were further enhanced by tree planting along the edges (Figure 2).
This local character of the landscape has survived the destructive effects of forty-five years of Soviet rule on landscape and society (large-scale industrial agriculture, collectivisation, nationalised forestry, etc.) and the arbitrary, chaotic changes in ownership and land use after the change of the regime in 1989, and is ready for renewal and further creation of value through the recent social self-organisation and professional activity. The traditional property structure still makes it difficult to make farming competitive [38,39].
Historically, the basic activities and main economic resources of the highland landscape have been forestry and wood processing. After the end of communism, the institution of public ownership of forests and mountain pastures was restored in Szeklerland. Forests are in undivided community ownership, where owners share both the duty of cultivation and the benefits. Wood processing, traditional folk woodworking, carpentry and joinery have become basic skills in this area [40,41].

1.2. The Significance of Mineral Waters from Medical and Landscape Aspects

The diversity of the landscape in Szeklerland is due, among other things, to the natural features resulting from its geological characteristics [42,43]. One of the main groups of these are the medicinal mineral springs and mofettes, which are the subject of this study and were the basis of a significant bathing culture developed over the centuries (Figure 3).
According to the Directive 2009/54/EC of the European Parliament and the Commission, mineral water is defined as a “microbiologically wholesome water originating in a groundwater table or deposit and emerging from a spring tapped at one or more natural bore exits. Natural mineral water can be clearly distinguished from ordinary drinking water: (a) by its nature, which is characterized by its mineral content, trace elements or other constituents and, where appropriate, by certain effects; (b) by its original purity. The characteristics referred to in point (a), which may give natural water properties favourable to health, shall have been assessed from the following point of view: geological and hydrological, physical, chemical and physico-chemical, microbiological, if necessary, pharmacological and clinical”.
Three types of mineral waters were defined according to the total dissolved mineral content: very low mineral content, with mineral salt content, calculated as a fix residue, under 50 mg/L, low mineral content, not greater than 500 mg/L; and rich in mineral salts, value greater than 1500 mg/L [44].
The concentration of mineral waters in Szeklerland varies between 500 mg/L and 200,000 mg/L with varied content of carbon dioxide or other gas, and temperatures between approximately 6 °C and 40 °C [46]. In particular, on the basis of their temperature, the mineral waters of the sites analysed in this study can be classified as cold thermal waters (below 31 °C). Even in a relatively small area, the composition of mineral waters is extremely diverse. Particularly common are mineral waters with high salt, sulphur or iron content, which have traditionally been used for thousands of years in two main forms, drinking water and bathing water, according to their mineral content (Figure 4).
The water from the mineral springs of Szeklerland began to be bottled in the 18th century, first in earthenware jugs and then in glass bottles. According to documents, the first bottled water in Szeklerland was ‘Korond water’ in 1792, followed by ‘Borszék mineral water’, which was called the king of mineral waters, in 1806 [47,48,49,50,51,52].
Around the numerous (hundreds of) mineral springs, smaller and larger baths were developed over time, which, according to a study by the surgeon and obstetrician Károly Cseh from 1873, helped cure various illnesses, both in the form of drinking and bath cures, such as stomach and intestinal disorders, anaemia, disorders of the excretory and respiratory organs, treatment of female ailments and male “inabilities”, musculoskeletal disorders, cardiovascular complaints, nervous weaknesses [53].
Descriptions from the 18th and 19th centuries, in which local residents report on the beneficial and healing effects of regular daily bathing, and archival photos demonstrate the lively bathing life in Szeklerland [54,55], (Figure 5).
During their history, there are two trends in the use of baths. The majority of baths have remained local, linked to a village or settlement. These vernacular baths, which preserved the natural state of the surroundings with minimal infrastructure (wooden pools, ladders), were mainly used by local people [57,58].
A small number of baths, thanks to their waters richer in minerals and favourable geographical location, developed into spa towns from the 1870s, provided with all the services and facilities needed for modern spa tourism. Drinking and bathing saloons, outdoor and indoor pools, sitting baths, mofettes, fountains, hotels, restaurants, theatres, parks, summer gardens, forest walks, pavilions and lookouts, etc., with architecture and facilities typical of the civic culture of the second half of the 18th century, were built, giving these spa towns a distinctive urban character and landscape [59,60,61].
However, the unfavorable political developments of the 20th century history destroyed the spas and almost permanently destroyed the vernacular baths and the traditions of their use, which made up the majority of this colourful bathing culture. The nationalisation that followed the Second World War put a brake on dynamic development ideas of local baths, and almost completely eradicated the traditional and civic bathing cultures. The state did not support the development of medical springs, claiming that they could dry up and that the public work of maintaining public baths had lost its value and credibility. For forty years from the 1950s, rural life and the traditional way of life in Szeklerland, including the folk bathing culture, were characterised by a period of stagnation and decay [62,63,64].
As a consequence, by the 1990s, a deplorable state of neglect had developed: the mineral water springs were clogged, the pools silted up, reclaimed by forest and vegetation, and the buildings had disappeared. In less than four decades, the results of centuries of conscious human activity, conservation and nature-friendly development have been destroyed (Figure 6).

1.3. Health and Landscape Aspects of the Bathing Culture in an International Context

The therapeutic use of the mineral waters—and especially of the hot springs—has been prevalent in Europe from ancient times to the present day. Baden-Baden, Bad Ischl, Bath, Budapest, Karlovy Vary, Spa or Vichy are only a few of the most famous European spa towns, but Europe is home to many more thermal spa settlements with unique urban character, different styles of architecture, and different spa traditions, built around bathing in or drinking of the thermal waters. This spa culture, in all its variety and different local flavours, can truly be considered a unique European heritage. The spa culture played a prominent role in the development of landscape architecture and open space design, influencing in a positive way the perception and environmental culture of the citizens; the building, use and maintenance of spas highlighted the importance of water and other natural values [65,66,67].
Thermal towns were the “cafés of Europe”, places where members of all strata of society could mix and exchange ideas—where the rules ensured civilised conduct. Thus, spas have played a leading role fostering peace, co-operation and creativity, protecting the built and natural environment, and promoting sustainable cultural development, a role that has been present throughout European history and continues to this day [68,69,70].
The importance of the European spa culture is proved among others by the fact, that the “European Route of Historic Thermal Towns” is one of the cultural routes of the Council of Europe, certified in 2010 [71].
In Europe, tourism and health services are almost exclusively based on the therapeutic and recreational use of thermal waters, whose positive physiological and recreational effects are well known. The Szekler cold bathing culture examined in this study differs fundamentally from the culture of thermal baths. The cold mineral waters of the Szekler vernacular baths have been proven to have general corroborative, powerful immunostimulating, antidepressant, stress-relieving and other medicinal effects, and there is extensive international medical and balneological literature on the medicinal effects of cold-water baths and mineral waters [72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80].
The regular use of medical baths by local residents, mostly in the summer season, is a part of the relaxation and cleansing after working in the fields/forests. Over the centuries, it has become part of daily routine as a natural remedy that stimulates circulation and metabolism, regenerates muscles and reduces arthritic pain, and its curative effects have contributed to the development of respect for nature and the need to preserve and maintain the natural environment over generations.
The conscious choice to stay relaxed in an uncomfortable situation (a cold mineral water basin) is itself a powerful mental exercise that builds self-confidence and resilience, which can have flow-on effects on the rest of your life.
Despite their recognised medical effects, the health and recreational use of cold-water baths has not spread widely. The example of Szeklerland is completely unique in Europe, because although cold water bathing has a centuries-old tradition in several Baltic and Scandinavian countries (cold water dipping after sauna bathing, medical or ritual ice bathing), none of these bathing customs is based on mineral waters with medicinal properties.
In the course of our research, we have not found any references in the relevant literature (medical, tourism, ethnographic, hydrogeological, landscape architecture, etc.) which would suggest a European practice similar to the Szekler folk mineral bathing culture. The literature and internet search has been extended to other continents.
Based on our results, we can say that in terms of the content of mineral waters, we have not found a hydrotherapeutic bathing culture similar to that of Szeklerland. In the places found after international research (Japan, China, Taiwan), not mineral water, but seawater or fresh water without significant mineral concentration is used for cold water bathing [81].
There are, however, many more similarities and parallels between the vernacular baths of Szeklerland and the internationally known examples and sites in terms of size, scale, location, landscape setting, natural environment and lower intensity of use. In this context, it can be noted that this tradition of bathing based on local use is typical for small communities all over the world, who use baths occasionally for short periods but on a regular basis. Bathing pools, created and maintained using traditional techniques, simple tools, natural or nature-friendly materials, with small-scale landscaping (at the level of object design) and community work, are everywhere integrated into the landscape in terms of their design, ecological and sustainability characteristics [82].

2. Materials and Methods

This paper discusses the landscape aspects of the unique vernacular baths based on mineral water in Szeklerland, and the process of the renewal of the environment of the baths. The article emphasizes the professional background and social significance of the bath renovation strategies.
Over the last twenty years, several folk baths in Szeklerland have been renovated with the involvement of the local community and representatives of various disciplines (landscape architecture, hydrogeology, architecture, social sciences, etc.). The work has been initiated and managed from the very beginning by the Ars Topia Foundation [83] and its professional partners.
The renewal of the vernacular baths in Szeklerland represents a social demand-led, sustainable environmental renewal programme realised with social participation, of which similar architectural initiatives are known worldwide [84,85,86,87]. According to the research by Csaba Jakab, the model of the bath building volunteer camps in the Carpathian Basin with a creative-educational purpose can be traced back to the 1970s, to the architecture camps of the BME in Visegrad, followed by several other initiatives [88,89]. The 2014 Venice International Architecture Biennale presented a number of volunteer building camps, among which vernacular bath buildings were represented in significant numbers [90]. The first collaborative building project of the Ars Topia Foundation was realized in 1997, specifically for landscape architects, in order to preserve and develop the landscape heritage in the Dörögd Basin, Hungary [91].
The number of mineral water springs and vernacular baths in Szeklerland is not known exactly, but it is estimated at several hundred. The harmony they represent between man and nature, their functional design, and traditional landscape imprint, make them characteristic sustainable elements of the Szeklerland landscape [92,93,94,95,96].

2.1. The Rationale behind the Bath Renovation Strategy

The traditional use of the destroyed mineral springs and folk baths is still alive in the memory of village communities. From the very beginning, the maintenance and environmental enhancement of vernacular baths of local significance was the responsibility of village communities, so it was clear that, in the spirit of sustainability and community development, successful renewal and future maintenance should involve local communities.
Accordingly, a participatory planning and building process has been visioned and realised in case of vernacular bath renewals as well. In the case of the pilot project, launched in 2000 in Lázárfalva (Lazaresti, Romania), three main pillars of the long-term renewal strategy were defined, which served later on the mission of the renewal strategy:
  • Community collaboration.
In the early 1990s, without financial resources, the local communities were in amnesia of losing their traditions. Considering these social and economic conditions, the most effective way to renovate folk baths was through the traditional form of community work, which is typical of Szeklerland. The main idea of the volunteer building camps is that everyone contributes to the community work what he or she has strength and knowledge in, and can afford: wood, transport, tools, food, accommodation, money, manual labour, skills, etc. The key to the success of the volunteer camps, launched in the early 2000s by the Ars Topia Foundation, is the innovative way in which the form of organisation that exists in the collective memory of local communities, cooperation based on solidarity and brought to life by real need, has been revived, opening it up to participants from other parts of the Carpathian Basin. In this way, besides municipalities, craftsmen and local helpers, university students, landscape architects, architects and geologists, professional and non-governmental organisations and churches were actively involved in the organisation, construction and implementation, leading to a broad dissemination of the method.
  • Economic and ecological sustainability.
The renewal and reconstruction of vernacular baths are at a level that can be accomplished with local, internal resources and a little external assistance, using the traditional working method described above. (The renewal of larger, urban spas is a difficult task, due to the confusion of ownership, the difficulties of privatisation processes and the greater demand for funds). The renewal of vernacular baths is characterised by sensitive interventions that are adapted to the site and respectful of nature and the environment. In addition to aesthetics, this approach also promotes sustainability and biodiversity. Apart from the natural features and land cultivation, the sites incorporate a number of specific architectural and cultural monuments, heritage and traditions, thereby they fulfil the quality requirements of the landscape heritage of Szeklerland. In the context of the use of natural resources, the use and intervention of vernacular baths typically only reach a degree that is strictly necessary to satisfy the bathing and the related functions [97]. No disproportionate paved surfaces, inappropriate materials, oversized infrastructure.
  • Environmental education.
One of the aims of the bath renovation strategy is that during the collaborative planning and construction work, the participants from the village and from other places (including abroad) will learn from each other how to recreate landscape heritage elements, how to preserve and use natural values in a sustainable and civilised way. The aim is to revive methods of natural erosion control, local traditional, often forgotten, building techniques, traditional Szekler ornamental painting, and to acquire knowledge of local materials and traditional craftsmanship in shaping wood and stone. In order to raise awareness of all this, invited guest speakers give lectures in the evenings during the camps on the topics of landscape, nature and heritage conservation, rural and regional development, ethnobotany, ethnography, protection of architectural features and the traditional character of villages.
Beside the mineral water, the post-volcanic activities also result in gas escapes, the medicinal properties of which are used in so-called mofettes (gas baths). The minerals dissolved in the gas, as well as the carbon dioxide, are excellent for curing serious vascular diseases. Mofettes, which were built in addition to vernacular baths, also proved to be popular and later became part of the civic bathing culture. Mofettes were also rebuilt in several places during the volunteer building camps.

2.2. The Scenario of the Bath Renovations

The renewal of the vernacular baths involves several dozen participants per site. In each case, the event itself takes around 10 to 14 days, but it is preceded by a much longer preparatory process lasting several weeks. Although each location and each community have its own special characteristics, there are some general principles and criteria that can be followed. According to the two decades of experience, the most effective scenario for organising and managing the event can be summarised in the following points [98].

2.2.1. Selection of the Location for the Bath Building Camp

  • It is selected from hundreds of mineral water springs of Szeklerland at least a year before the camp, allowing enough time to prepare.
  • The mineral water spring (the bath) should be located in public space that is always open to everyone.
  • If a request is received from a local community, this could be a priority criterion for selection.

2.2.2. Preparation for the Camp

  • Identifying team leaders. A team leader can be someone who has already participated in a camp and has the desire to work as a team leader. The team leaders decide among themselves who will take on which task with their group.
  • On-site visit. The purpose of the field trip is to become acquainted with the site and its history, to make a survey (drawings of the site, photo documentation), to meet the local community and to understand their needs.
  • Landscape design. Based on a concept developed collaboratively by the preparatory team and the local community, each group prepares the design on a given subject (e.g., soil erosion control, habitat protection) or object (wellhead installation, seating pool, swimming pool, changing rooms, toilets, pavilion, stairs, boardwalks etc.). This work involves landscape architects and architects or students of these disciplines (e.g., in the context of a university assignment or a student design competition). The plans will be presented to the local residents in a village forum, where they will have the opportunity to comment, discuss, and develop the idea (Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9).
  • Village forum. Organised by the local community. Organised by the local community, its purpose is to enable the participants of the building camp and the local residents to become to know each other and to plan together in advance.
  • Cooperation agreement. Established between those coordinating and organising the camp, it includes commitments and obligations (not only for construction but also for maintenance afterwards).
  • The raising of financial resources. The work of all participants is a voluntary donation. Most of the volunteers are university students. The organisers will also obtain grants to run the event (e.g., for the transport of volunteers). The local people organise the local activities (accommodation and food for the participants, purchase and transport of building materials, supply of tools, presence of local craftsmen, organisation and implementation of fundraising event in the village for the camp).
  • Announcement of the camp. The building camps are organised as an open volunteer movement. The main means of recruiting participants is through university announcement, but those who have already participated spread the message among their friends. It can be considered as an internship for university students.

2.2.3. Managing the Building Camp

  • Launching the camp. Some of the organisers travel to the site a few days before the start, organise the arrival, or, if the terrain is difficult and the work is heavy, carry out professional preparatory work (mowing, shrub clearance, marking out objects, etc.)
  • Community work. Once the participants have arrived, the construction work starts with professional supervision. The camp is not only about building, but is also a creative event, with a rich programme of community-building and intellectual activities. (Figure 10).
  • Ceremonial opening. On the last day of the camp, the renovated bath is officially opened and inaugurated by a common barbecue gathering and celebration of the participants and the entire village community.
  • Afterlife of the renewed baths. Ensuring that the objective is achieved: the attachment to the place created by collaborative work also helps the local community to care for and maintain the renovated baths in the long term through their own efforts.

3. Results

3.1. Renovation of Twenty-Two Folk Baths in Szeklerland

In the last twenty years, twenty-two folk baths have been renovated during the bath building volunteer camps organised in Szeklerland, which started in the early 2000s. The geographical location of the renewed sites within the region is illustrated in Figure 3. Table 1 lists the sites in chronological order of renovation.
The bath renovations are a living example of tradition, natural medicine, environmental protection and community building for the local community. They raise awareness in local communities and the wider society of the importance of water, its medicinal properties and traditional ways of drinking and bathing.

3.2. Broad Professional and Social Participation

In addition to the local residents, a significant number of university students, mainly of landscape architecture and architecture, had also participated the camps. The camps were organised, run and supported in cooperation of government agencies, NGOs, professional organisations, entrepreneurs, churches and educational institutions, as a spontaneous, grassroots initiative. Over the past 21 years, more than 10,000 people have participated in the camps, including volunteers, local residents and supporters, which shows the social importance of the programme.
The work is useful for heritage protection and landscape conservation, but its greatest benefit is the awakening of the community to the fact that there are internal resources in the landscape, in the community, and that all it takes is will, cooperation and trust to build a livelihood on these values.

3.3. Landscape Architecture and Landscape Protection

The environment of vernacular baths is changed and shaped by nature every year. That is why it is difficult to build in a professionally acceptable way. Nature does not understand the installations of uninitiated, it destroys them and returns. The secret of building lies in understanding the place, which helps to create a built environment that co-exists organically with the place. The baths renovation programme provides a practical opportunity for young designers and students to learn and master traditional sustainable building methodologies, techniques and thinking. Through their ecological characteristics, design and the use of materials, the renovated baths will fit in with the character of the landscape and its local characteristics, thus enhancing its cultural value (Figure 11).
The constructions are relatively simple: if necessary, a wooden spout is built upon the spring, which directs the water into a wooden basin sunk into a pit. The bottom and walls of the pool are insulated from the outside with clay. Sometimes a spring will fill a pit from the ground, without a visible wellhead. In this case, the mineral water flows in through the gaps in the wood. The beams of the bottom of the pool are laid on a gravel bed, and filtering layer is applied along the side walls to prevent the flowing water from washing the soil into the structure.

3.4. Community Building

Working together have been part of the life of the common man since ancient times. Tasks that were beyond the power of the individual could only be accomplished by working together. Instead of machines, relatives and neighbours helped to build a house, thresh the grain or pluck the feathers. Together, the work becomes easier, time is spent in conversation and fun, and the village community is built. People become to know each other, open up to the community, and are able to live their daily lives in community and harmony.

3.5. Keeping Traditions Alive

An important aim of the bath building volunteer camps is to keep traditions alive. It is not only about reviving the tradition of collaborative work, but also about practising the traditional forms of construction. The materials used, the techniques employed, the forms and motifs used are all sourced from the world of simple-minded people, from local traditions. The built environment, based on the use of ancient, uniform use of materials and technology, also contributes to the characteristic visual appearance of the landscape specific to the location. The simple structures that support the use of the baths are among the last remaining examples of a type of architecture that is now dying out.
The ornamental motifs and architectural techniques (e.g., traditional carpentry) used in vernacular bath architecture in the second half of the 19th century are important and characteristic features of this environment [99,100].
These shapes and proportions still play a dominant role today, both in evoking the baths’ heyday and in the nature of social and community life.

3.6. Personal Development

The camps have a great impact on all participants. In addition to shaping the environment, internal development is also important. People make friends, find role models and the evening activities help them to grow spiritually. From a professional point of view, landscape architects and architects have a significant experience of working with their hands and learning from local craftsmen. Everyone is shaped by the company, the atmosphere, the place and the work. The local village community by welcoming the participants as guests, and the volunteers by learning about local values and ways of thinking.

4. Conclusions

The strategy for the renovation of the vernacular baths in Szeklerland is a professional landscape architecture programme that has developed and gained recognition as the bottom-up initiative, based on social needs. The professional communities from Hungary, organised on the basis of the traditional knowledge of local communities, played a key role in the development of this strategy. The importance of these professional communities and the landscaping they initiated lies in the fact that, owing to their broad social recognition, the local or more distant partners who joined them have subsequently passed on the traditional landscape approach in many other places, in new professional partnerships.
A common feature of these professional communities is that they are strongly linked to the university-level landscape architecture education in Budapest. The university’s clear mission is not only to educate but also to shape attitudes, and this must go beyond the classroom.
The Ars Topia Foundation is one of the pioneering professional workshops that set the direction of Transylvanian landscape architecture in the 21st century. The most significant result of the foundation’s activities is undoubtedly the organisation of bath building volunteer camps in Szeklerland, the renewal of vernacular baths and local communities. The notion of landscape development based on heritage protection is also a key element in the activities of the Ars Topia Foundation. As intellectual and professional units, these professional communities have developed close cooperation with the landscape architecture higher education in Budapest (Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Budapest) and with the landscape architecture education in Transylvania (Sapientia EMTE University, Targu Mures, Romania). Following the camps organised, landscape surveys and surveys of valuable landscape features were also carried out with the participating landscape architecture students at several sites of the camps, organised by the Ars Topia Foundation. A general vision is to research and teach how development should be based on the values of the landscape, with respect to the traditional way of life of local societies. In recent years, the voluntary work of the professional communities has changed. The motivation of the participants has become more professional, and the projects have been increasingly formalised: they have been integrated into university courses, accepted as internship, and have been used and developed as topics for theses and dissertations, and even doctoral dissertations. It is no secret intention to support the professional development and networking of young generations of landscape architects by organising joint field trips, design workshops and building camps, one of the best examples of which is the programme for the sustainable renewal and development of vernacular baths in Szeklerland, introduced in this article.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.F., M.S. and Á.H.; methodology, A.F., M.S. and Á.H.; software, N.D.G.; validation, A.F., M.S. and Á.H.; formal analysis, N.D.G.; investigation, A.F., M.S. and Á.H.; resources, A.F., M.S. and Á.H.; data curation, Á.H.; writing—original draft preparation, A.F.; writing—review and editing, A.F. and M.S.; visualization, N.D.G.; project administration, A.F. and M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding. The publication was supported by Hungarian University of Life Sciences—MATE.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the work of the anonymous reviewers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Herczeg, Á. Fürdőépítő kalákák Székelyföldön. Zöldműves 2006, 1, 34–36. Available online: https://zoldmuves.termuves.hu/?q=furdoepito-kalakak-szekelyfoldon (accessed on 8 December 2021).
  2. Fekete, A. Erdélyi Tájépítészet 2000–2020—Egy Szakma Születése. I. Táj, Közösség, Műhelymunka. 12 December 2020. Available online: https://epiteszforum.hu/erdelyi-tajepiteszet-2000-2020--egy-szakma-szuletese-i-taj-kozosseg-muhelymunka (accessed on 17 December 2021).
  3. Fekete, A. Erdélyi Tájépítészet 2000–2020—Egy Szakma Születése. II. Oktatás, Kutatás, Tervezés. 13 December 2020. Available online: https://epiteszforum.hu/erdelyi-tajepiteszet-2000-2020--egy-szakma-szuletese-ii-oktatas-kutatas-tervezes (accessed on 17 December 2021).
  4. Douglas, P. Leisure Settings: Burgeois Culture, Medicine and the Spa in Modern France; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kósa, L. Fürdőélet a Monarchiában; Holnap Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bender, T. A balneoterápia és a hidroterápia hatása mozgásszervi megbetegedésekben Egy régi terápia újjászületése. Lege Artis Med. 2005, 15, 921–926. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kox, M.; van Eijk, L.T.; Zwaag, J.; van den Wildenberg, J.; Sweep, F.C.G.J.; van der Hoeven, J.G.; Pickkers, P. Voluntary activation of the sympathetic nervous system and attenuation of the innate immune response in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 7379–7384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Vofkori, L. Székelyföld Útikönyve I–II; Cartographia: Budapest, Hungary, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  9. Székelyföld Települései, Székely Városok, Székely Falvak. Székelyföld Térképek. Available online: http://szekelyfold.terkepek.net/ (accessed on 10 December 2021).
  10. Juvigne, E.; Gewelt, M.; Gilot, E.; Hurtgen, C.; Seghedi, I.; Szakács, A.; Gábris, G.; Hadnagy, A.; Horváth, E. Une eruption vieille d’environ 10 700 ans (14C) dans les Carpates orientalis (Roumanie). C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 1994, 1, 325–343. [Google Scholar]
  11. Moriya, I.; Okuno, M.; Nakamura, T.; Ono, K.; Seghedi, I. Radiocarbon ages of charcoal fragments from the pumice flow deposits of the last eruption of Ciomadul volcano, Romania. In Summaries of Researches Using AMS at Nagoya University (VII); Nagoya University: Nagoya, Japan, 1996; pp. 252–255. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kőváry, L. Erdélyfölde Ritkaságai, Kilencz fa-Metszvénynyel; Nyomtatott Kiadás: Kolozsvártt, Romania, 1853; p. 17. Available online: https://mek.oszk.hu/07800/07862/07862.pdf (accessed on 15 December 2021).
  13. Orbán, B. A Székelyföld Leírása, Történelmi, Régészeti, Természetrajzi s Népismei Szempontból; Nyomatott Panda és Frohna Könyvnyomdájában: Pest, Hungary, 1868; Available online: https://mek.oszk.hu/04800/04804/html/ (accessed on 17 December 2021).
  14. Teleki, D. A Székely Határőrség Története; Szabó Károly–Franklin: Budapest, Hungary, 1877. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jókai, M. Bálványosvár; Athenaeum: Budapest, Hungary, 1883. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hankó, V. Székelyföld; Lampel Róbert (Wodianer, F. és Fiai): Budapest, Hungary, 1896; Available online: https://mek.oszk.hu/10700/10784/10784.pdf (accessed on 8 December 2021).
  17. Bányai, J. Adatok a Hargitai Ásványvizek Geológiájához. Emlékkönyv a Székely Nemzeti Múzeum 50 Éves jubileumára; Székely Nemzeti Múzeum: Sepsiszentgyörgy, Romania, 1929. [Google Scholar]
  18. Móricz, Z. Erdély. Tündérkert; Athaeneum Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1939. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bierbauer, V. A Székelyföld templomairól. Magyarságtudomány 1942, 1, 144–145. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kónya, Á.; Kovács, S. Bálványosfürdő és Környéke; Kovászna Megyei Turisztikai Hivatal: Sepsiszentgyörgy, Romania, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  21. Szádeczky, L. A Székely Nemzet Története és Alkotmánya; Csíkszereda Kiadóhivatal: Csíkszereda, Romania, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  22. Schmidl, A. Reisehandbuch Durch das Königriech Ungarn Mit den Nebenländern und Dalmatien, Nach Serbien, Bukarest und Constantinopel; Gerold: Wien, Austria, 1835. [Google Scholar]
  23. Paget, J. Ungarn und Siebenbürgen: Politisch, Statistisch, Öconomisch; Verlag von J. J. Weber: Leipzig, Germany, 1842; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  24. De Gerando, A. La Transylvanie et Ses Habitants; Imprimeurs-Unis: Paris, France, 1845. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fermor, P.L. Between the Woods and the Water: On Foot to Constantinople: From the Middle Danube to the Iron Gates; John Murray Press: London, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  26. ELC. Council of Europe Landscape Convention, European Treaty Series—No. 176. 2000. Available online: https://www.coe.int/en/web/landscape/text-of-the-european-landscape-convention (accessed on 7 December 2021).
  27. Ambrus, T. A Székely Falutízesek, Egy Sajátos Településrendszer, Mint a Társadalmi-Gazdasági Tevékenység Kerete. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Sciences, Doctoral School of Earth Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary, 2010; p. 24. Available online: http://old.foldrajz.ttk.pte.hu/phd/phdkoord/nv/disszert/disszertacio_ambrus_nv.pdf (accessed on 8 December 2021).
  28. Egyed, Á. A Székelyek Rövid Története a Megtelepedéstől 1989-ig; Pallas-Akadémia: Budapest, Hungary, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  29. Imreh, I. A Rendtartó Székely Falu; Kriterion Könyvkiadó: Bukarest, Hungary, 1973; p. 294. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rackam, O. The History of the Countryside—The Classic History of Britain’s Landscape, Flora and Fauna; Orion Publishing Corp.: London, UK, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  31. Muir, R. Landscape Encyclopedia—A Reference Guide to the Historic Landscape; Windgather: Bollington, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ambrus, T. A gyepű mint kultúrtájtípus Székelyföldön. Tájökológiai Lapok 2009, 7, 65–79. [Google Scholar]
  33. Eplényi, A.; Erwin, F. Lynchets—Ackerterrassenlandschaften in Rumänien—Die landschaftsprägenden Ackerterrassen in Kalotaszeg. Zoll+ Osterr. Schr. Landscahft Freiraum 2011, 21, 62–66. [Google Scholar]
  34. Csemez, A. Tájtervezés-Tájrendezés; Mezőgazda Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1997; pp. 193–195. [Google Scholar]
  35. Swanwick, C. Landscape Character Assessment—Guideance for England and Scotland; The Countryside Agency & Scottish National Heritage; Cheltenham, Gloucestershire and Scottish Natural Heritage; Countryside Agency: Edinburgh, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wöbse, H.H. Landschaftsästhetik—Über das Wesen, die Bedeutung und den Umgang mit landschaftlicher Schönheit, 1st ed.; Verlag Eugen Ulmer: Stuttgart, Germany, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rippon, S. Historic Landscape Analysis—Deciphering the Countryside; Council for British Archaeology: York, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  38. Dragoman, D.; Luca, S.-A.; Gheorghiță, B. Szeklerland and The Birth of a New Region in Europe: An Inquiry into Symbolic Nationalism. Studia Politica Rom. Political Sci. Rev. 2020, 20, 33–54. Available online: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-68464-1 (accessed on 13 December 2021).
  39. Newall, V. The Destruction of the Hungarian Villages in Romania. Anthropol. Today 1988, 4, 3–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Barbócz, Z. The Branding Power of Szeklerland. Online Place Branding Tendencies and Identity-Forming Efforts in Szeklerland. Acta Univ. Sapientiae Commun. 2020, 7, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jakab, A.-Z.; Vajda, A. (Eds.) The New Contexts of Cultural Heritage: Function, Usage, Interpretation; Kriza János Néprajzi Társaság: Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  42. Jánosi, C.; Péter, É. (Eds.) A Hargita-Hegység és Környéke Ásványvizes Fürdői; CSTTE: Csíkszereda, Romania, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  43. Jánosi, C.; Berszán, J.; Péter, É. A Csomád-hegység ásványvizes fürdői (Mineral spas of Csomád/Ciomatu Massif). Acta Siculica (Természettudományok) 2011, 1, 41–56. [Google Scholar]
  44. DIRECTIVA 2009/54/CE A PARLAMENTULUI EUROPEAN ȘI A CONSILIULUI din 18 Iunie 2009 Privind Exploatarea și Comercializarea Apelor Minerale Naturale. Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene. 2009. Available online: Efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/viewer.html?pdfurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apeleminerale.ro%2F_res%2Fpdf%2F1C.pdf&clen=850511&chunk=true (accessed on 12 December 2021).
  45. Zsigmond, E. (Ed.) Székelyföld Borvizei és Gyógyfürdői; Cartographia: Budapest, Hungary, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  46. Czellecz, B. Ásványvizekben bővelkedő Székelyföld. Művelődés 2014, LXVII, 10. Available online: https://muvelodes.net/tudomany/asvanyvizekben-bovelkedo-szekelyfold (accessed on 19 December 2021).
  47. Mátyus, I. Diaetetica; Páldi István: Kolozsváratt, Romania, 1762; pp. 374–375. Available online: https://library.hungaricana.hu/hu/view/ORSZ_ORVO_Muzealis_35_1_Matyus_Diaetetica_az_az_a_jo_eletnek_1/?pg=0&layout=s (accessed on 14 December 2021).
  48. Crantz, H.J. Gesundbrunnen der Oesterreichischen Monarchie; Gedruckt bey Joseph Gerold: Wien, Austria, 1777. [Google Scholar]
  49. Herczeg, Á.; Jánosi, C. A Csomád-bálványosi gyógyfürdőzés, turizmus és vendégvárás történetéből. Országépítő 2002, 13, 39–41. [Google Scholar]
  50. Jánosi, C.; Péter, É.; Herczeg, Á. (Eds.) Székelyföldi Fürdők, Gyógyhelyek; B. K. L. Kiadó: Szombathely, Hungary, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  51. Mirk, L. A székelyföldi borvízforrások vizeinek és neveinek sokfélesége. Honismeret 2009, 37, 96–100. Available online: https://epa.oszk.hu/03000/03018/00214/pdf/EPA03018_honismeret_2009_05_096-100.pdf (accessed on 13 December 2021).
  52. Kis, B.-M.; Baciu, C. The mineral waters from the Eastern Carpathians: A historical and chemical overview. EcoTerra-J. Environ. Res. Prot. 2013, 36, 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  53. Cseh, K. Borszék Gyógyászati és Nemzetgazdasági Szempontból; Pesti Könyvnyomda RT: Pest, Hungary, 1873. [Google Scholar]
  54. Knöpfler, W. Geognostisch-balneologische Skitzen aus Siebenbürgen. In Verhandlungen und Mittheilungen des Siebenbürgischen Vereins für Naturwissenschaften zu Hermannstadt; Jahrgang VII. N-ro 1 Janner; Siebenbürgischer Verein für Naturwissenschaften zu Hermannstadt: Hermannstadt, Romania, 1856; pp. 213–219. [Google Scholar]
  55. Orbán, B. A székelyek Származásáról és Intézményeiről; Arcanum Digitális Tudománytárban: Kolozsvár, Romania, 1888; Available online: www.arcanum.com/hu/online-kiadvanyok/Lexikonok-magyar-irok-elete-es-munkai-szinnyei-jozsef-7891B/o-9DACB/orban-balazs-lengyelfalvi-baro-9E0CC/ (accessed on 13 December 2021).
  56. Vofkori, G. Székelyudvarhely-Várostörténet Képekben; Polis Kiadó: Kolozsvár, Romania, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  57. Kőváry, L. A Lajtántúli Fürdők Szervezete És Berendezése, Tekintettel az Erdélyi Fürdők Kívánalmaira; Ajtai K. Albert Könyvnyomdája: Kolozsvár, Romania, 1891. [Google Scholar]
  58. Zepeczaner, J. Fürdők a Hargita nyugati oldalán a dualizmus korában. Korunk 2009, 3, 36–45. [Google Scholar]
  59. Kósa, L. Fürdőkultúra és természetszemlélet kapcsolata a felvilágosodástól a 20. század elejéig. In Európa híres kertje: Történeti Ökológiai Tanulmányok Magyarországról; R.-Várkonyi, Á., Kósa, L., Eds.; Orpheusz: Budapest, Hungary, 1993; pp. 201–222. [Google Scholar]
  60. Blackbourn, D. Fashionable Spa Towns in Nighteenth-century Europe. In Water, Leisure and Culture: European Historical Perspectives; Anderson, S.C., Tabb, B.H., Eds.; Berg Publishers: Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 9–22. [Google Scholar]
  61. Pearalta, M.A. Heilende Wasser in Ungarn; Carita Bt: Budapest, Hungary, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  62. Böröcz, J. Leisure Migration—A Sociological Study on Tourism; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  63. Gidó, C. Magyar Karlsbad. Székely Fürdők az Osztrák Monarchia Korában. 2011. Available online: https://eletmod.transindex.ro/?cikk=14348 (accessed on 4 January 2022).
  64. Lövei-Kalmár, K. A fürdőélet átalakulása Magyarországon a 20. században a társadalmi, politikai változások tükrében. In Vörös és Fehér: Társadalmi-Politikai Átmenetek Északkelet-Magyarországon a 19–20. Század Fordulójától; Eszterházy Károly Egyetem Líceum Kiadó: Eger, Hungary, 2020; pp. 177–192. [Google Scholar]
  65. Kurek, K.A.; Heijman, W.; van Ophem, J.; Gedek, S.; Strojny, J. Geothermal spas as a local development factor, the case of Poland. Geothermics 2020, 85, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. McGrath, E.; Harmer, N.; Yarwood, R. Ferries as travelling landscapes: Tourism and watery mobilities. Int. J. Cult. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2020, 14, 321–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nistoreanu, P.; Aluculesei, A.-C. Can Spa Tourism Enhance Water Resources and Turn Them into a National Brand? A Theoretical Review about the Romanian Case. Information 2021, 12, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Vodenska, M. (Ed.) Hospitality and Toursim in Transition in Central and Eastern Europe: A Comparative Analyzis; Cambridge Scholar Publishing: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  69. Wood, K. Health and Hazard: Spa Culture and the Social History of Medicine in the Nineteenth Century; Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2013; ISBN 978-1-4438-4099-6. [Google Scholar]
  70. Aluculesei, A.-C.; Nistoreanu, P.; Avram, D.; Nistoreanu, B.G. Past and Future Trends in Medical Spas: A Co-Word Analysis. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. COE. Cultural Route of the Council of Europe. 2010. Available online: https://www.coe.int/en/web/cultural-routes/european-route-of-historic-thermal-towns (accessed on 12 December 2021).
  72. Crook, J.K. The Mineral. Waters of the United States and Their Therapeutic Uses; Leo Bros: New York, NY, USA, 1899. [Google Scholar]
  73. Choukroun, M.L.; Varene, P. Adjustments in oxygen transport during head-out immersion in water at different temperatures. J. Appl. Physiol. 1990, 68, 1305–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Hembry, P.M. The English Spa, 1560–1815: A Social History; The Athlone Press: London, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  75. Benedetto, A.V.; Millikan, L.E. World survey of mineral water and spas Mineral Water and Spas in the United States. Clin. Dermatol. 1996, 14, 583–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Srámek, P.; Simecková, M.; Jánsky, L.; Savliková, J.; Vybíral, S. Human physiological responses to immersion into water of different temperatures. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2000, 81, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Huttunen, P.; Kokko, L.; Ylijukuri, V. Winter swimming improves general well-being. Int. J. Circumpolar Health 2004, 63, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Sato, D.; Kaneda, K.; Wakbayashi, H.; Nomura, T. The water exercises improve health-related quality of life of frail elderly people at day service facility. Qual. Life Res. 2007, 16, 1577–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bleakley, C.; Mcdonough, S.; Gardner, E.; Davison, G.W.; Naxter, D.G.; Hopkins, J.T. Cold-water immersion (cryotherapy) for preventing and treating muscle soreness after exercise. Pub. Med. Gov. 2012, 2, 38–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Mooventhan, A.; Nivethitha, L. Scientific Evidence-Based Effects of Hydrotherapy on Various Systems of the Body. N. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2014, 6, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Huang, S.-J.; Tang, P.-X. Study on Su-Ao Cold Springs Park Service Quality Attributes Using a Kano Model. Leis. Ind. Res. 2009, 7, 4558–4567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Battisti, C.; Cerfolli, F. From Citizen Science to Citizen Management: Suggestions for a pervasive fine-grained and operational approach to biodiversity conservation. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. AT 2002. Available online: https://www.arstopia.hu (accessed on 6 December 2021).
  84. Rudofsky, B. Architecture without Architects, an Introduction to Nonpedigreed Architecture, Nov 11, 1964–Feb 7, 1965; The Museum of Modern Art (MoMA); Doubleday: New York, NY, USA, 1964. [Google Scholar]
  85. Lepik, A. Small Scale, Big Change: New Architectures of Social Engagement, Oct 3, 2010–Jan 3, 2011; Exhibition; The Museum of Modern Art (MoMA): New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  86. Epstein-Marvis, M. The Rise and Rise of Pop-Up Architecture, How Temporary Design Became Mainstream. Curbed. 9 March 2016. Available online: https://archive.curbed.com/2016/3/9/11180920/architecture-history-temporary-banksy (accessed on 19 December 2021).
  87. Karim, F. (Ed.) The Routledge Companion to Architecture and Social Engagement; Routledge: London, UK, 2020; ISBN 9780367580674. [Google Scholar]
  88. Jakab, C. ÉP-ÍT-ÉS: A Kárpát-Medencei Modell—A Magyarországi Építész-Alkotótáborok Története; MMA Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  89. Jacobson, S.K.; McDuff, M.D.; Monroe, M.C. Conservation Education and Outreach Techniques; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  90. Jakab, C.; Márton, L.A. Building, 14. Nemzetközi Építészeti Biennále—La Biennale di Venezia; M. Alkotóművészeti Közhasznú Nonprofit Kft.: Szentendre, Hungary, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  91. Herczeg, Á. A tájfejlődés lehetőségei, Dörögdi-medence. Országépítő 1993, 4, 36–38. [Google Scholar]
  92. Herczeg, Á. Tájban élünk. Ökotáj 2004, 33–34, 93–100. [Google Scholar]
  93. Herczeg, Á.V. Székelyföldi fürdőépítő kaláka. Országépítő 2005, 3, 28–34. [Google Scholar]
  94. Herczeg, Á.; Tikk, D.; Rahnama, A. Torsanlorenzo-díjas a Székelyföldi Fürdő- és Közösségépítő Kaláka mozgalom. Országépítő 2011, 22, 12–15. [Google Scholar]
  95. Herczeg, Á. (Ed.) Kalákázni jó! Ars Topia Alapítvány: Budapest, Hungary, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  96. Turi, A. A “Tájgyógyító”. MMA 2019. Available online: https://www.mma.hu/hr/ (accessed on 17 December 2021).
  97. Sárospataki, M. A sepsibükszádi Mikes-fürdők tájépítészeti rehabilitációja, In A táj változásai a Kárpát-medencében. Az erdélyi táj változásai; Füleky, G., Ed.; Környezetkímélő Agrokémiáért Alapítvány-SZIE: Gödöllő, Hungary, 2008; pp. 138–143. [Google Scholar]
  98. Herczeg, Á.; Jánosi, C.; Jánosi, K. Székelyföldi Fürdők, Gyógyhelyek. BKL Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  99. Huszka, J. A Székely Ház; Pesti Könyvnyomda-Részvény-Társaság: Budapest, Hungary, 1895. [Google Scholar]
  100. Huszka, J. A Magyar Turáni Ornamentika Története; Pátria: Budapest, Hungary, 1930. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Location of the study area (Szeklerland) and planning (strategic) area on the map of Europe. Source: prepared by the authors based on the map of Szeklerland [9].
Figure 1. Location of the study area (Szeklerland) and planning (strategic) area on the map of Europe. Source: prepared by the authors based on the map of Szeklerland [9].
Land 11 00095 g001
Figure 2. Landscape and land use in Szeklerland. Source: photos by the authors (a,b,e,f) and by Ars Topia Foundation (c,d). The figures show the mosaic-like landscape shaped by traditional use of parcels (grassland, meadow) and the land occupation typical for mountain villages.
Figure 2. Landscape and land use in Szeklerland. Source: photos by the authors (a,b,e,f) and by Ars Topia Foundation (c,d). The figures show the mosaic-like landscape shaped by traditional use of parcels (grassland, meadow) and the land occupation typical for mountain villages.
Land 11 00095 g002
Figure 3. Map of mineral water sources of Szeklerland. The map shows among different hydrogeological aspects the location of bath building volunteer camps in Szeklerland. Source: prepared by the authors and technical contribution of Maja Erdei based on the map of Zsigmond Enikő [45] and own research of the authors.
Figure 3. Map of mineral water sources of Szeklerland. The map shows among different hydrogeological aspects the location of bath building volunteer camps in Szeklerland. Source: prepared by the authors and technical contribution of Maja Erdei based on the map of Zsigmond Enikő [45] and own research of the authors.
Land 11 00095 g003
Figure 4. The colours of mineral waters differs depending on their various chemical composition: as far as the high concentration of iron induce a red or yellow coloration (a (above),c,f), the blue (a (below)) and grey (b,d,e) tones show the high sulphurosus content of the water. Source: photos by Ars Topia Foundation.
Figure 4. The colours of mineral waters differs depending on their various chemical composition: as far as the high concentration of iron induce a red or yellow coloration (a (above),c,f), the blue (a (below)) and grey (b,d,e) tones show the high sulphurosus content of the water. Source: photos by Ars Topia Foundation.
Land 11 00095 g004
Figure 5. Use of traditional mineral baths by local people at the end of 19th century and first part of the 20th century: (a,b)—Nádasfürdő (Source: Ars Topia Foundation); (c)—Torja (source: photo collection of Szkler National Museum Sepsiszentgyörgy); (d)—Kirulyfürdő (source: private collection of Csaba Jánosi); (e)—Sósfürdő, Székelyudvarhely (source: Vofkori György [56]); (f)—Homoródfürdő (source: private photo collection of Márton Balázs).
Figure 5. Use of traditional mineral baths by local people at the end of 19th century and first part of the 20th century: (a,b)—Nádasfürdő (Source: Ars Topia Foundation); (c)—Torja (source: photo collection of Szkler National Museum Sepsiszentgyörgy); (d)—Kirulyfürdő (source: private collection of Csaba Jánosi); (e)—Sósfürdő, Székelyudvarhely (source: Vofkori György [56]); (f)—Homoródfürdő (source: private photo collection of Márton Balázs).
Land 11 00095 g005
Figure 6. Ruined traditional baths in the 1990s: (a)—Parajdfürdő, (b,e)—Csiszárfürdő, (c)—Hammasfürdő, (d)—Szelterszfürdő, (f)—Vallató (source: Ars Topia Foundation).
Figure 6. Ruined traditional baths in the 1990s: (a)—Parajdfürdő, (b,e)—Csiszárfürdő, (c)—Hammasfürdő, (d)—Szelterszfürdő, (f)—Vallató (source: Ars Topia Foundation).
Land 11 00095 g006
Figure 7. Concept and renewed site of the Csipkés mineral water bath in Zabola (Zabala, Romania), as result of the sustainable strategy for renovation of vernacular baths in 2018. List of designers and contributors on the https://www.arstopia.hu/2018-kalakak-zabola (accessed on 5 December 2021).
Figure 7. Concept and renewed site of the Csipkés mineral water bath in Zabola (Zabala, Romania), as result of the sustainable strategy for renovation of vernacular baths in 2018. List of designers and contributors on the https://www.arstopia.hu/2018-kalakak-zabola (accessed on 5 December 2021).
Land 11 00095 g007
Figure 8. Design details, concept and renewed basin of the Szent Anna bath in Csíkszenttamás (Tomesti, Romania) in 2007. List of designers and contributors on the https://www.arstopia.hu/2007kalaka (accessed on 5 December 2021).
Figure 8. Design details, concept and renewed basin of the Szent Anna bath in Csíkszenttamás (Tomesti, Romania) in 2007. List of designers and contributors on the https://www.arstopia.hu/2007kalaka (accessed on 5 December 2021).
Land 11 00095 g008
Figure 9. Design details and photo of the renewed site of Hammas bath in Sepsibükszád (Bixad, Romania), 2010. Design by Máté Sárospataki and János Hómann.
Figure 9. Design details and photo of the renewed site of Hammas bath in Sepsibükszád (Bixad, Romania), 2010. Design by Máté Sárospataki and János Hómann.
Land 11 00095 g009
Figure 10. Instant photos of community work. Source: Albert Fekete, Gábor Kulich, Máté Sárospataki, Ars Topia Foundation.
Figure 10. Instant photos of community work. Source: Albert Fekete, Gábor Kulich, Máté Sárospataki, Ars Topia Foundation.
Land 11 00095 g010
Figure 11. Detail photos of some renewed vernacular baths of community work. Source: Ars Topia Foundation.
Figure 11. Detail photos of some renewed vernacular baths of community work. Source: Ars Topia Foundation.
Land 11 00095 g011
Table 1. List of the bath-building volunteer camps in Szeklerland, in chronological order. The table shows certain sites repeated. Several rehabilitation landscape interventions for restoration purposes have been carried out on these sites over a number of years.
Table 1. List of the bath-building volunteer camps in Szeklerland, in chronological order. The table shows certain sites repeated. Several rehabilitation landscape interventions for restoration purposes have been carried out on these sites over a number of years.
NoYear of Community WorkName of BathHungarian and Romanian Name of the Settlement
12001NyírfürdőLázárfalva/Lazaresti
22002NádasfürdőTusnád/Tusnad
32003SószékfürdőCsíkkozmás/Cozmeni
42004SóskútfürdőKászonújfalu/Casinu Nou
52005Borsáros fürdőCsíkszentkirály/Sancraieni
62006Kerekeger feredőCsobotfalva/Cioboteni
72006Barátok feredőjeCsíksomlyó/Sumuleu-Ciuc
82006Dungó feredőHomoródkarácsonyfalva/Craciunel
92006Tókerti tanodaLázárfalva/Lazaresti
102007Szent Anna feredőCsíkszenttamás/Tomesti
112007Vallató fürdőSepsibükkszád/Bixad
122008Csomafalvi feredőGyergyócsomafalva/Ciumani
132009Tündérkerti feredőBorszék/Borsec
142010Lázárfalvi kútLázárfalva/Lazaresti
152010Hammas fürdőSepsibükkszád/Bixad
162011Süttei feredőSepsibodok/Bodoc
172012Malom és Csókás feredőCsernáton/Cernat
182013Maczkó bácsi feredőjeKisbacon/Batanu Mic
192014Bugyogó feredőZalánpatak/Valea Zalanului
202015Apor lányok feredőjeBálványos/Balvanyos
212016Büdös feredőBölön/Belin
222017Nádika fürdőGelence/Ghelinta
232018Csipkés feredőZabola/Zabala
242019Dungó feredőHomoródkarácsonyfalva/Craciunel
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fekete, A.; Herczeg, Á.; Ge, N.D.; Sárospataki, M. Participatory Landscape Design and Water Management—A Sustainable Strategy for Renovation of Vernacular Baths and Landscape Protection in Szeklerland, Romania. Land 2022, 11, 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010095

AMA Style

Fekete A, Herczeg Á, Ge ND, Sárospataki M. Participatory Landscape Design and Water Management—A Sustainable Strategy for Renovation of Vernacular Baths and Landscape Protection in Szeklerland, Romania. Land. 2022; 11(1):95. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010095

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fekete, Albert, Ágnes Herczeg, Ning Dong Ge, and Máté Sárospataki. 2022. "Participatory Landscape Design and Water Management—A Sustainable Strategy for Renovation of Vernacular Baths and Landscape Protection in Szeklerland, Romania" Land 11, no. 1: 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010095

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop