Spatial Targeting of Agricultural Support Measures: Indicator-Based Assessment of Coverages and Leakages
1
Department of Geography, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA
2
Department of Geography and the Environment, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Carlos Parra-López
Land 2021, 10(7), 740; https://doi.org/10.3390/land10070740
Received: 17 June 2021 / Revised: 12 July 2021 / Accepted: 13 July 2021 / Published: 15 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Socio-Economic and Political Aspects of Contemporary and Historical Land Issues)
Agricultural support programs distribute payments to farms based on a diverse set of policy objectives. Adequate targeting of this support to priority areas is key to efficient and effective policy. We evaluated the targeting strategy of a national-level program in Mexico that distributed support based on seven criteria that prioritized poor smallholder farming communities at high risk of cropland failure. We used a series of logistic models to assess the coverage and leakage rates of the program’s targeting strategy and found rates of about 80 and 20 percent, respectively. We also found significant differences between the targeting priorities specified in program rules and the observed distribution of support measures. In general, the program favored arid and semi-arid regions at high risk of soil erosion but neglected smallholder farms in high-poverty regions with elevated rates of cropland failure. Our findings highlight the continued lack of financial support for smallholder agriculture in Mexico, despite program rules and priority statements that stress the vulnerability of this sector. This study also illustrates the important role of spatial targeting in better aligning agricultural support payments with stated policy priorities. This alignment is often overlooked in ex-post assessment, but it is critical for improving targeting precision, equity, and overall policy effectiveness.
View Full-Text
Keywords:
agri-environmental policy; smallholder; poverty; climate; targeted support
▼
Show Figures
Figure 1
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
MDPI and ACS Style
LaFevor, M.C.; Ponette-González, A.G.; Larson, R.; Mungai, L.M. Spatial Targeting of Agricultural Support Measures: Indicator-Based Assessment of Coverages and Leakages. Land 2021, 10, 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10070740
AMA Style
LaFevor MC, Ponette-González AG, Larson R, Mungai LM. Spatial Targeting of Agricultural Support Measures: Indicator-Based Assessment of Coverages and Leakages. Land. 2021; 10(7):740. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10070740
Chicago/Turabian StyleLaFevor, Matthew C., Alexandra G. Ponette-González, Rebecca Larson, and Leah M. Mungai 2021. "Spatial Targeting of Agricultural Support Measures: Indicator-Based Assessment of Coverages and Leakages" Land 10, no. 7: 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10070740
Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
