Next Article in Journal
Land Abandonment in Mountain Areas of the EU: An Inevitable Side Effect of Farming Modernization and Neglected Threat to Sustainable Land Use
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Land Use on Concentrations of Nutrients and Selected Metals in Bottom Sediments and the Risk Assessment for Rivers of the Warta River Catchment, Poland
Article

Scientific Cooperation: Supporting Circumpolar Permafrost Monitoring and Data Sharing

1
Center for Arctic Security and Resilience, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA
2
Association of Polar Early Career Scientists, Arctic Institute, IS-600 Akureyri, Iceland
3
Department of Geography, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham TW20 0EX, UK
4
Geophysical Institute (Emeritus), University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA
5
School of Management, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA
6
Department of Geography, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Alexander N. Fedorov
Land 2021, 10(6), 590; https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060590
Received: 9 May 2021 / Revised: 28 May 2021 / Accepted: 1 June 2021 / Published: 3 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Land Systems and Global Change)
While the world continues to work toward an understanding and projections of climate change impacts, the Arctic increasingly becomes a critical component as a bellwether region. Scientific cooperation is a well-supported narrative and theme in general, but in reality, presents many challenges and counter-productive difficulties. Moreover, data sharing specifically represents one of the more critical cooperation requirements, as part of the “scientific method [which] allows for verification of results and extending research from prior results”. One of the important pieces of the climate change puzzle is permafrost. In general, observational data on permafrost characteristics are limited. Currently, most permafrost data remain fragmented and restricted to national authorities, including scientific institutes. The preponderance of permafrost data is not available openly—important datasets reside in various government or university labs, where they remain largely unknown or where access restrictions prevent effective use. Although highly authoritative, separate data efforts involving creation and management result in a very incomplete picture of the state of permafrost as well as what to possibly anticipate. While nations maintain excellent individual permafrost research programs, a lack of shared research—especially data—significantly reduces effectiveness of understanding permafrost overall. Different nations resource and employ various approaches to studying permafrost, including the growing complexity of scientific modeling. Some are more effective than others and some achieve different purposes than others. Whereas it is not possible for a nation to effectively conduct the variety of modeling and research needed to comprehensively understand impacts to permafrost, a global community can. In some ways, separate scientific communities are not necessarily concerned about sharing data—their work is secured. However, decision and policy makers, especially on the international stage, struggle to understand how best to anticipate and prepare for changes, and thus support for scientific recommendations during policy development. To date, there is a lack of research exploring the need to share circumpolar permafrost data. This article will explore the global data systems on permafrost, which remain sporadic, rarely updated, and with almost nothing about the subsea permafrost publicly available. The authors suggest that the global permafrost monitoring system should be real time (within technical and reasonable possibility), often updated and with open access to the data (general way of representing data required). Additionally, it will require robust co-ordination in terms of accessibility, funding, and protocols to avoid either duplication and/or information sharing. Following a brief background, this article will offer three supporting themes, (1) the current state of permafrost data, (2) rationale and methods to share data, and (3) implications for global and national interests. View Full-Text
Keywords: permafrost; permafrost monitoring; permafrost data; data sharing; national security permafrost; permafrost monitoring; permafrost data; data sharing; national security
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Bouffard, T.J.; Uryupova, E.; Dodds, K.; Romanovsky, V.E.; Bennett, A.P.; Streletskiy, D. Scientific Cooperation: Supporting Circumpolar Permafrost Monitoring and Data Sharing. Land 2021, 10, 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060590

AMA Style

Bouffard TJ, Uryupova E, Dodds K, Romanovsky VE, Bennett AP, Streletskiy D. Scientific Cooperation: Supporting Circumpolar Permafrost Monitoring and Data Sharing. Land. 2021; 10(6):590. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060590

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bouffard, Troy J., Ekaterina Uryupova, Klaus Dodds, Vladimir E. Romanovsky, Alec P. Bennett, and Dmitry Streletskiy. 2021. "Scientific Cooperation: Supporting Circumpolar Permafrost Monitoring and Data Sharing" Land 10, no. 6: 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060590

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop