Next Article in Journal
Sediment Yield in Dam-Controlled Watersheds in the Pisha Sandstone Region on the Northern Loess Plateau, China
Previous Article in Journal
Mining, Urban Growth, and Agrarian Changes in the Atacama Desert: The Case of the Calama Oasis in Northern Chile
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Does Farmland Scale Management Promote Rural Collective Action? An Empirical Study of Canal Irrigation Systems in China

1
Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
2
School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
3
China Institute for Rural Studies, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
4
School of Public Policy and Management, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2021, 10(11), 1263; https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111263
Submission received: 20 October 2021 / Revised: 12 November 2021 / Accepted: 18 November 2021 / Published: 19 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Land Socio-Economic and Political Issues)

Abstract

Farmland scale management represents an inevitable trend toward global modern agriculture. In the new development context, the key to solving the tough problem of the insufficient supply of rural public goods is to effectively improve the enthusiasm of farming households to participate in rural collective action in countries with a small arable area per capita, such as India, China and countries in Eastern Europe. This paper adopts the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework in the context of a land system with Chinese characteristics, and uses sample data of 3663 rural households in 17 provinces to study the impact of farmland scale and various relevant systems on farming households’ participation in rural collective action. We found that the advantages of collective action, such as reduced production costs, enhanced risk resistance and improved production efficiency, can offset the disadvantages incurred by free-riding behavior, and the expansion of farmland scale can significantly facilitate rural collective action. Additionally, as the farmland scale expands, stable farmland tenure and reasonable farmland tenure transfer can help to optimize the allocation of arable land resources, increase investment, and reduce free-riding behavior, thus effectively stimulating farming households to actively participate in collective action. However, since socialized agricultural services lead to the separation of the suppliers and the users of rural public goods, the expansion of farmland scale shows a negative effect. Therefore, in the context of the continuous migration of the rural population to cities, a stable farmland tenure adjustment mechanism should be established, while the balance between farmland tenure transfer and socialized agricultural services, in pushing forward rural collective action, should be emphasized, so as to ensure the effective supply of rural public goods in propelling farmland scale management. Especially in promoting the development of socialized agricultural services, more attention should be paid to specifying the responsibilities and obligations of the main provider of commercialized services in the supply of rural public goods.
Keywords: farmland scale management; collective action; farmland tenure stability; farmland tenure transfer; socialized agricultural services; Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework farmland scale management; collective action; farmland tenure stability; farmland tenure transfer; socialized agricultural services; Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zang, L.; Wang, Y.; Su, Y. Does Farmland Scale Management Promote Rural Collective Action? An Empirical Study of Canal Irrigation Systems in China. Land 2021, 10, 1263. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111263

AMA Style

Zang L, Wang Y, Su Y. Does Farmland Scale Management Promote Rural Collective Action? An Empirical Study of Canal Irrigation Systems in China. Land. 2021; 10(11):1263. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111263

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zang, Liangzhen, Yahua Wang, and Yiqing Su. 2021. "Does Farmland Scale Management Promote Rural Collective Action? An Empirical Study of Canal Irrigation Systems in China" Land 10, no. 11: 1263. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111263

APA Style

Zang, L., Wang, Y., & Su, Y. (2021). Does Farmland Scale Management Promote Rural Collective Action? An Empirical Study of Canal Irrigation Systems in China. Land, 10(11), 1263. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111263

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop