Next Article in Journal
Aspects of Hexavalent Chromium Pollution of Thebes Plain Aquifer, Boeotia, Greece
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessing Thermally Stressful Events in a Rhode Island Coldwater Fish Habitat Using the SWAT Model
Previous Article in Journal
Watershed Variability in Streambank Erodibility and Implications for Erosion Prediction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Water Resources of the Black Sea Catchment under Future Climate and Landuse Change Projections
Article Menu
Issue 8 (August) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2017, 9(8), 610;

Assessment of Nitrogen Inputs into Hunt River by Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems via SWAT Simulation

Department of Geosciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 15 June 2017 / Revised: 20 July 2017 / Accepted: 8 August 2017 / Published: 16 August 2017
Full-Text   |   PDF [4242 KB, uploaded 16 August 2017]   |  


Nonpoint source nitrogen pollution is difficult to effectively model in groundwater systems. This study aims to elucidate anthropogenic nonpoint source pollution discharging into Potowomut Pond and ultimately Narragansett Bay. Hydrologic modeling with Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Program (SWAT-CUP) was used to simulate streamflow and nitrogen levels in the Hunt River with and without onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS). The objective of this study was to determine how input of OWTS data impacts nitrogen loading into the Hunt River Watershed in Rhode Island, USA. The model was simulated from 2006 to 2014, calibrated from 2007 to 2011 and validated from 2012 to 2014. Observed streamflow data was sourced from a US Geological Survey gauge and nitrogen loading data from University of Rhode Island Watershed Watch (URIWW). From the results, adding OWTS data to the SWAT simulation produced a better calibration and validation fit for total fit (Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) = 0.50 calibration, 0.78 validation) when compared with SWAT simulation without OWTS data (NSE = −1.3 calibration, −6.95) validation. View Full-Text
Keywords: nitrogen; SWAT; OWTS; waste water; septic; watershed nitrogen; SWAT; OWTS; waste water; septic; watershed

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Paul, S.; Cashman, M.A.; Szura, K.; Pradhanang, S.M. Assessment of Nitrogen Inputs into Hunt River by Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems via SWAT Simulation. Water 2017, 9, 610.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top