Next Article in Journal
Spanish Agriculture and Water: Educational Implications of Water Culture and Consumption from the Farmers’ Perspective
Next Article in Special Issue
Newspaper Coverage of Potable Water Recycling at Orange County Water District’s Groundwater Replenishment System, 2000–2016
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Numerically the Benefits of Water Discharge Prediction for the Remote RTC of WDNs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Water Saving and Cost Analysis of Large-Scale Implementation of Domestic Rain Water Harvesting in Minor Mediterranean Islands
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

UV Disinfection of Hand-Rinse Greywater and Performance Testing Using Indigenous Staphylococcus spp.

School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2017, 9(12), 963;
Submission received: 1 November 2017 / Revised: 4 December 2017 / Accepted: 8 December 2017 / Published: 11 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Development of Alternative Water Sources in the Urban Sector)


Greywater reuse is a feasible solution for decreasing raw water extraction in urban and rural settings. However, pathogen-specific performance guidelines and regulations have only recently been recommended; practical means to assess performance are missing. Here we examine the efficacy of Staphylococcus spp. as an endogenous surrogate for greywater pathogen reduction performance testing, by evaluating UV-C irradiation of hand-rinse greywater, and the variability in UV resistance between different wild Staphylococcus species. Hand-rinse greywater samples were collected from five participants, and a collimated UV-C beam (256 nm) was used to assess log10 reductions. Assays of colony-forming units on tryptic soy agar (TSA) were compared to mannitol salt agar (MSA) using LysostaphinTM to confirm Staphylococcus spp. After irradiating raw hand-rinse samples to a dose of 220 mJ·cm−2, log10 reductions of Staphylococcus spp. were similar (2.1 and 2.2, respectively, p = 0.112). The similarity of the reduction based on TSA and Staphylococcus-specific culture assays following UV irradiation and the dominating presence of Staphylococcus spp. suggests that Staphylococcus spp. could be used as an endogenous performance surrogate group for greywater treatment testing. Suspended wild Staphylococcus isolates were irradiated with 256 nm UV-C to compare the variability of different Staphylococcus species. Staphylococcus isolates exhibited significant variance in log10 reduction values when exposed to 11 mJ·cm−2 of UV-C. Staphylococcus hominis subsp. hominis exhibited surprising resistance to UV-C, with only a 1.6-log10 reduction when exposed to 11 mJ·cm−2 of UV-C (most other isolates exhibited > 5-log10 reduction). The efficacy of UV-C was also significantly reduced when the sunscreen oxybenzone was present at a possible endogenous greywater concentration.

1. Introduction

According to UN Water, approximately 2 billion people globally live in areas of water scarcity and another 1.6 billion face economic water shortage (lacking the necessary infrastructure for water transportation) [1]. Current municipal water distribution practices of treating all wastewater (black water and greywater combined) are generally neither economic nor sustainable for future generations [2,3]. Greywater is typically defined as household wastewater without faecal contribution (i.e., toilet effluent); this includes sources such as wash-basin, shower/bath, laundry, etc. The practice of greywater reuse is a relatively unexplored concept in urban developments; it has the potential to reduce municipal water demands by 50% on average [4] and up to 70% [5] depending on the end use. However, in many parts of the world, including North America, the practice of domestic greywater reuse is in general illegal [4]. An important step forward in gaining government endorsement for greywater reuse is a better understanding of the contaminants, treatment needs, and appropriate treatment system performance testing, as required in water safety plans [6].
This paper is a follow-up to a 2017 study by Shoults and Ashbolt [7] to better understand how to assess ultraviolet (UV) irradiation performance testing without the need for externally spiked surrogates. The original study was based off a 2014 next-generation sequencing study by Zimmerman et al. [8] which identified Staphylococcus spp. as the most abundant bacterial genus in laundry greywater sourced from a university sports facility. To better understand the microbiological constituents of greywater, a literature review was conducted and identified 41 studies, however, only three studies measured greywater for total staphylococci [8,9,10], with several focusing on Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) [8,9,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Of the three studies that measured total staphylococci, total staphylococci was found to be among the most abundant bacteria when compared to faecal coliforms (FC), total coliforms (TC), Escherichia coli (E. coli), Enterococcus spp., and other traditional faecal indicator bacteria (FIB). Given the pathogenic nature of S. aureus [17,18], which along with S. epidermidis is among the most prevalent species on human skin [19], we proposed total staphylococci be considered as an endogenous surrogate to represent performance testing in greywater treatment systems, given the inherent problems with using FIB [7]. Overall, there is a collective need for the scientific community and regulatory bodies to better understand the efficacy of prospective surrogates to assess greywater treatment performance. The experiments in the current study explored an array of considerations to determine the efficacy of total staphylococci as an endogenous performance surrogate.
As with any disinfection process, there are limitations to UV irradiation. While the effects of large/many suspended particles on the efficacy of UV are understood [20], the role of micro-pollutants and personal care products (PCP) on the efficacy of UV irradiation are relatively unknown. Given the high reported concentrations of the sunscreen benzophenone (BP3), commonly referred to as oxybenzone [21], the effects of oxybenzone on the efficacy of UV irradiation for staphylococci was also studied.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Hand-Rinse Samples to Recover Skin-Bacteria and Evaluate Their UV-Resistance

Hand-rinse samples were collected from five participants using a “glove method”. Participants inserted each hand, one at a time, into a large powderless latex free nitrile glove filled with 40 mL of municipally sourced, sterile deionized (DI) water. Using their free hand, participants massaged the submerged hand to ensure maximum water to hand contact for bacterial shedding. After approximately 30 s of exposure, participants inserted their other hand and repeated the previous step. Sterile DI water was used instead of tap water to reduce background bacterial input and confounding effects of residual chlorine. Soap was not used so as to reduce potential bacteriostatic effects and to avoid increased turbidity, as the goal was not to simulate greywater production, but rather to isolate skin-borne bacteria for UV-irradiation and enumerate viable cells using two isolation agars. The resulting bacterial suspension was poured into a sterile beaker and thoroughly mixed. A 28.3 mL portion of the sample was poured into a 60 mm sterile Petri dish so as to give a 1 cm greywater depth. A sterile 5 mm × 2 mm stir bar was placed in the dish and the dish was placed onto a magnetic mixer operating at 400 rpm to facilitate mixing without vortexing.
An AquaSense Pearl Beam collimated LED UV reactor (Florence, KY, USA) with a peak wavelength of 256 nm and a half bandwidth of 11.5 nm was used to deliver 256 nm UV-C irradiation to the raw hand-rinse sample using an adapted EPA protocol [22]. Equation (1) was used to calculate the effective intensity (Eave) of the collimated beam based on measurable variables [23]:
E ave = 0.98 [ E 0 L ( ( 1 A ) L 1 ln ( 1 A ) ) ]
The incident intensity (E0) was measured using a NSF certified radiometer (UVP Radiometer, Model UVX-25, Upland, CA, USA). The water height (L) was measured to 1 cm (28.3 mL in a 60 mm cylindrical Petri dish), and a spectrophometer (Thermo Scientific, Genesys 10S UV-VIS, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to measure the absorbance (A) of 256 nm UV in the suspension. The resulting Eave was then multiplied by the exposure time (seconds) in order to calculate the resulting dosage in mJ·cm−2.
To estimate staphylococci counts prior to irradiating the sample, 100 µL of the sample was diluted to 10−1; 100 µL of the dilution was pipetted into 15 mL of sterile 0.85% NaCl buffer then filtered through a 60 mm diameter filter cup apparatus with a 0.22 µm polycarbonate (PC) membrane filter (IsoporeTM GTTP-04700, Cork, IRL) using a vacuum pump. The filtering process was performed a total of six times and the resulting filter papers were placed on tryptic soy agar (TSA) and mannitol salt agar (MSA) plates, both in triplicate.
For UV irradiation of samples, the collimated beam was placed over the Petri dish containing 28.3 mL of a raw hand-rinse sample (as described above), and then irradiated to a dose of 220 mJ·cm−2. In order to achieve a consistent dose for each person’s greywater sample, the absorbance was measured prior to exposure to adjust the exposure time for a resulting dose of 220 mJ·cm−2. After exposing samples to 220 mJ·cm−2, the entire sample was poured into a sterile 50 mL capped test tube and vortexed to ensure adequate mixing. Upon vortexing, 1 mL of the post-irradiated sample was pipetted into 15 mL of sterile 0.85% NaCl buffer and plated using the above described filter-plating technique. TSA and MSA plates were incubated at 37 °C for 18–24 h before assaying colony forming units (CFU).
Given the similarity in growth conditions of the expected staphylococci and micrococci and that no selective medium is known to easily resolve these genera, we confirmed pure isolates using LysostaphinTM tablets, known to reliably differentiate between staphylococci (lysis) and micrococci (no lysis) [24]. Upon assaying, LysostaphinTM tablets were used for total staphylococci confirmation for colonies from MSA plates (see [25] for protocol). Five LysostaphinTM confirmations were performed on each of the triplicate MSA plates, for a total of 30 confirmations per sample (15 at 0 mJ·cm−2 and 15 at 220 mJ·cm−2). The fraction of lysis positive LysostaphinTM confirmation tests was multiplied by the CFU counts from the MSA assays to estimate the fraction of CFU assayed from MSA which were considered totally staphylococci. Equation (2) was used to calculate the log10 reduction after exposure for each assay:
Log 10 Reduction = Log ( CFU   Control 100 uL CFU   Dosage 100 uL )

2.2. Hand-Rinse Isolates

Upon assaying the MSA control plates, two or three colonies from each participant were isolated onto separate MSA plates, which were then incubated for 18–24 h at 37 °C, and then re-streaked at least once more onto MSA plates to ensure purity. Once pure cultures were isolated (total of 14), they were analyzed using a VITEKTM (2 COMPACT) instrument to determine genera and species.
The collimated UV beam procedure was performed on a total of 14 isolates from five different participants as well as a clinical Staphylococcus aureus strain acquired from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), S. aureus (ATCC 25923). A presumed Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 12228) strain was confirmed as Staphylococcus lentus upon VITEKTM confirmation and was also used in this study. Overnight cultures grown in Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) were diluted to 1:100 in a sterile 0.85% NaCl. Once diluted, the above collimated UV beam procedure was performed to irradiate suspended cells (with the following modification). Prior to irradiation, 100 µL of the sample was plated on TSA plates in triplicate at the appropriate dilution to effectively assay control plates. Samples were irradiated to 11 mJ·cm−2 (slightly less than the approximate dose required for ~4-log10 reduction of S. aureus, being a likely targeted reduction level [7]), and allowing for post exposure detection of at least some samples. Upon irradiation, 100 µL of the sample was plated in triplicate on TSA at the appropriate dilutions to effectively assay the plates, and log10 reductions were calculated using Equation (2). A portion of the samples were irradiated at 7, 9, and 11 mJ·cm−2 in order to estimate decay equations.

2.3. Oxybenzone (BP3)

The collimated UV beam procedure described above was performed using S. aureus (ATCC 25923) to determine the effects of a sunscreen, oxybenzone, on the performance of UV inactivation. Oxybenzone was used as a test compound due to the relatively high concentrations (reports as high as 0.7 mg·L−1) when compared to other UV filters/sunscreens [21]. Since the source of oxybenzone in municipal wastewater is likely from greywater, oxybenzone and other micro-pollutant/PCP concentrations would likely be higher in greywater than in municipal wastewater (which is diluted by blackwater). As shown in a 2005 study by Palmquist and Hanæus [26], organic compound pollutants were typically in greater concentrations within greywater samples when compared to blackwater and sometimes an order of magnitude higher in concentration. Therefore an oxybenzone concentration range of 1 mg·L−1 to 10 mg·L−1 was used due to the expected increase of oxybenzone concentration in greywater. Oxybenzone was dissolved into dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (166.7 µL·L−1) and pipetted into sterile 0.85% NaCl buffer at two different concentrations: 10 mg oxybenzone·L−1 and 1 mg oxybenzone·L−1; DMSO was suspended into two separate buffer solutions (at 166.7 and 16.67 µL·L−1 for the two solutions respectively) used as controls to adjust for any confounding effects of DMSO on the reduction of S. aureus by UV irradiation. Overnight cultures of S. aureus (ATCC 25923) suspended in TSB were suspended into the four samples (10 mg oxybenzone·L−1, 1 mg oxybenzone·L−1, and respective controls) and irradiated to a UV-C dose of 11.8 mJ·cm−2 using the previously described collimated beam apparatus protocol. Samples were assayed on TSA plates in at least triplicate prior to and after exposure to UV. Log10 reductions were quantified using Equation (2). A paired t-test was performed between oxybenzone and respective controls on the log10 reduction means.

2.4. Control Experiments

Two additional control experiments were performed to ensure homogeneity with literature as well as consistency throughout the experiments. An 11-point dose-response curve using MS2 bacteriophage (ATCC 15597-B1) was performed using a double agar protocol and assayed by plaquing [27]; this curve was then compared to a 2006 UV-C study [28] performed using MS2 and was found to be within the same log10 reduction range (see Figure S1 for graph comparison).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SigmaPlot (Version 13.0, Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). All reported tests passed the Shapiro-Wilk normality test. All reported p-values are two tailed and are the result of paired t-tests, unless otherwise stated.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Raw Hand-Rinse

Estimated total staphylococci CFU counts on MSA (TS-MSA) before and after UV-C exposure (220 mJ·cm−2) from the five participants made up the majority of the total TSA CFU counts (T-TSA) (90% and 75% respectively). More importantly, the log10 of the TS-MSA to T-TSA ratio (displayed as a percentage) of before and after UV-C exposure was 99% and 97% respectively. A paired t-test (see Table 1) was performed comparing the log10 reduction from UV-C exposure within the T-TSA and TS-MSA assays from the five participants; the log10 reductions of T-TSA and TS-MSA were not found to be significantly different (p = 0.112). The similarity in log10 reduction of the T-TSA and TS-MSA assays (means of 2.1 and 2.2 respectively) suggests that TS-MSA was representative of bacterial reduction by UV-C irradiation of the hand-rinse water from the five participants. Figure 1a depicts the T-TSA and TS-MSA assays before and after exposure to UV-C. The T-TSA and TS-MSA concentrations reported in this study are not considered representative of concentrations across all wash-basin greywater sources, as soap was not used and only 40 mL was used to wash participants’ hands; rather, the significance of this study is exhibited in the consistently similar T-TSA and TS-MSA concentrations, implying the vast majority of recovered bacteria were staphylococci.
Although the results from the five participants were consistent (See Table S2), more replication of this study on a variety of greywater sources is necessary to confidently suggest total staphylococci as a performance surrogate for greywater treatment. A 1981 study by Abshire and Dunton [29] showed that S. aureus was more resistant to UV-C than the saprozoic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa (also typically present in greywater [13]); however, a 2007 study by Gilboa and Friedler [13] found S. aureus to be the least resistant to UV-C irradiation when compared to faecal coliforms (FC), P. aeruginosa, and Clostridium perfringens at low doses. However, as shown in this study, given the dominating concentrations of Staphylococcus spp. in raw greywater [8,10], Staphylococcus spp. may still be a practical representative surrogate for total bacterial pathogenic reduction in greywater.
Although TS-MSA represented the majority of T-TSA, a paired t-test showed that when T-TSA and TS-MSA assays were compared (both before and after exposure) the log10 means were statistically significantly different (p = 0.04 for both) (see Table 1). However, when assessing MSA and TSA assays (both before and after exposure) prior to LysostaphinTM confirmations, no statistical difference was observed (p = 0.78 and 0.73 respectively). Staphylococcus spp., some Micrococcus spp., and some Enterococcus spp. are of the few organisms known to be capable of growing in the high salt environment in MSA [30,31]; it is likely that the majority of the LysostaphinTM negative MSA CFU were Micrococcus spp., as micrococci are one of the more abundant bacteria genera inhabiting human skin [32], however no further confirmations were performed to determine what the non-Staphylococcus spp. were. Figure 1a displays the T-TSA and TS-MSA assays before and after UV exposure.
A notable concern within this study was the lack of bacterial reduction by 256 UV-C at a dose of 220 mJ·cm−2, which should have yielded at least a 5-log10 reduction in viable bacteria (as previously shown by Shoults and Ashbolt [7]). This is not surprising, however, as Winward et al. showed a significant decrease in UV-C efficacy of bacterial reduction in water with high turbidity and low UV transmittance [20]. The 256 nm absorbance (A256 nm) readings ranging from 0.164 to 0.360 (see Table S1) and were not normalized, as given in the unadjusted Equation (1); the A256 readings would likely have been increased by the use of soap in this study, and thus soap wasn’t used. Two future considerations should be given towards future studies involving UV-C irradiation of raw greywater:
  • Pre-treatment prior to UV-C irradiation is likely necessary in order to achieve more than a 2-log10 reduction of endogenous bacteria due to particulate shielding and organic quenching effects; and
  • Equation (1) describing the delivered UV-C intensity requires adjustment to account for shielding/quenching from high turbidity/organics in greywater samples.
A 2006 study by Liu and Zhang examined the effects of turbidity on the efficacy of bacterial and coliphage reduction by UV; although there was not a major difference in UV-C efficacy between turbidities of 0.5 and 4 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU), there was a significant difference between 4 and 12 NTU [28]. This suggests pre-treatment removal of particles to a turbidity of <12 NTU is probably necessary for optimal UV-C efficacy.

3.2. Hand-Rinse Isolates

The aim of this portion of the study was to examine the variability of resilience of environmental staphylococci isolates. The following Staphylococcus species were isolated from the five participants’ hands (all multiples of species are from different participants): S. aureus (1), S. capitis (2), S. epidermidis (3), S. haemolyticus (2), S. hominis subsp. hominis (S. hominis) (1), S. pasteuri (3), and S. warneri (2). The effects of 256 nm UV-C at a dose of 11 mJ·cm−2 were assessed in order to determine the variance of resistance to UV within and between Staphylococcus species; the results are displayed in Table 2:
When exposed to 256 nm UV-C at a dose of 11 mJ·cm−2, the majority of isolates experienced at least a 5-log10 reduction. However, there was significant variance in log10 reductions after UV exposure between different Staphylococcus spp., with a less significant variance within each species. S. hominis and S. haemolyticus were significantly more resistant to UV-C irradiation than the other isolates. The linear decay equations for S. hominis and S. haemolyticus were y = 0.23x − 0.96 (R2 = 0.97) and y = 0.30x + 0.25 (R2 = 0.91), respectively, where (y) is log10 reduction, and (x) is the dose in mJ·cm−2. Decay equations were not obtained for the other bacteria, due to insufficient plate counts at each exposure assay. A previous 2017 study by Shoults and Ashbolt determined that Staphylococcus spp. (as represented by S. aureus and S. epidermidis (ATCC 12228 as used in Shoults and Ashbolt [7] was confirmed by MALDI-MS VITEKTM verification, but characterized as S. lentus by VITEK2TM phenotyping) was more sensitive to UV-C irradiation than some FIB [7]. However, the relative resistance of S. hominis and S. haemolyticus suggests Staphylococcus spp. may be as resistant to UV as FIB. However, further study is required to understand the full range of resistance within Staphylococcus spp.

3.3. Affects of Oxybenzone on UV-C Efficacy

Though UV blockers such as oxybenzone are known to quench the effects of UV when used on skin (common compound in sunscreens), the direct impacts of sunscreens and other PCPs on the efficacy of UV irradiation for domestic water treatment are not well known. Figure 2a,b display the effects of oxybenzone on the efficacy of reduction of S. aureus (ATCC 29523) by 256 nm UV-C.
Samples containing oxybenzone (concentrations of 10 mg·L−1 and 1 mg·L−1) exhibited significantly lower log10 reductions (p = 0.003 and 0.01 respectively) than their respective negative controls (containing no oxybenzone). This may help explain the lack of bacterial reduction of raw hand-rinse greywater (see Figure 1) when exposed to a dose of 220 mJ·cm−2; it is expected many of the hand-rinse samples contained PCPs, creams, or sunscreen agents. Although it is generally well understood that pre-treatment is necessary prior to UV irradiation, it is important to know which compounds are to be removed and to what extent. PCPs can be difficult to remove from greywater [33,34], however, depending on the intended end-use of the treated effluent, removal may be necessary if UV is to be the sole disinfection step.

4. Summary and Conclusions

The research displayed in this paper evaluated the efficacy of 256 nm UV-C in treating raw hand-rinse water, analyzed the efficacy of total culturable Staphylococcus spp. as an endogenous surrogate group to represent bacterial reduction, examined the variability of wild Staphylococcus spp. isolates when exposed to UV-C, and assessed the impacts of the sunscreen oxybenzone on the efficacy of UV-C irradiation. It is clear pre-treatment is necessary prior to UV irradiation for a log10 reduction of greater than two to be observed; the presence of PCP compounds (such as oxybenzone) as well as turbidity can have a negative effect on the efficacy of UV-C irradiation. Given the high prevalence of Staphylococcus spp. found in the five samples of raw hand-rinse water and more generally reported on human skin, future greywater studies should investigate the surrogate use of endogenous Staphylococcus spp. for bacterial reduction in greywater reuse systems to better understand any limitations at field-scale. Further research should be performed to assess the log10 reductions by other disinfection methods of Staphylococcus spp. relative to other pathogens of concern to determine if Staphylococcus spp. would be an adequate endogenous surrogate for other disinfection processes. Finally, the results in this study have shown that the sunscreen oxybenzone can have a negative effect on the efficacy of UV irradiation; further research should also address the role of other PCPs on the efficacy of UV irradiation.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at, Table S1: Raw hand-rinse water reduction, Table S2: Staphylococcus spp. isolate data, Figure S1: MS2 Literature Comparison.


This work was supported by grants from Alberta Innovates—Health Solutions and the Canadian Foundation for Innovation. All work was completed through the School of Public Health at the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. The authors would like to give a special thank you to Candis Scott for running isolate analysis.

Author Contributions

David C. Shoults and Nicholas J. Ashbolt conceived and designed the experiments; David C. Shoults performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper as part of his M.Sc. study under the supervision of Nicholas J. Ashbolt.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. UN Water. Coping with Water Scarcity: Challenge of the Twenty-First Century; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  2. Strengers, Y.; Maller, C. Materialising energy and water resources in everyday practices: Insights for securing supply systems. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2012, 22, 754–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chang, N.B.; Qi, C.; Yang, Y.J. Optimal expansion of a drinking water infrastructure system with respect to carbon footprint, cost-effectiveness and water demand. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 110, 194–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. National Research Council of the National Academics. Using Graywater and Stormwater to Enhance Local Water Supplies: An Assessment of Risks, Costs, and Benefits; National Research Council of the National Academics: Washington, DC, USA, 2016; p. 420. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ashbolt, N.J. The short pipe path—Safe water, energy & nutrient recovery. Proc. Water Environ. Fed. 2011, 2011, 1233–1241. [Google Scholar]
  6. World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines for the Safe Use of Wastewater, Excreta and Greywater; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  7. Shoults, D.C.; Ashbolt, N.J. Total staphylococci as performance surrogate for greywater treatment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zimmerman, B.D.; Ashbolt, N.J.; Garland, J.L.; Keely, S.; Wendell, D. Human mitochondrial DNA and endogenous bacterial surrogates for risk assessment of graywater reuse. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 7993–8002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Keely, S.P.; Brinkman, N.E.; Zimmerman, B.D.; Wendell, D.; Ekeren, K.M.; De Long, S.K.; Sharvelle, S.; Garland, J.L. Characterization of the relative importance of human- and infrastructure-associated bacteria in grey water: A case study. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 119, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Benami, M.; Busgang, A.; Gillor, O.; Gross, A. Quantification and risks associated with bacterial aerosols near domestic greywater-treatment systems. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 562, 344–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kim, J.; Song, I.; Oh, H.; Jong, J.; Park, J.; Choung, Y. A laboratory-scale graywater treatment system based on a membrane filtration and oxidation process—Characteristics of graywater from a residential complex. Desalination 2009, 238, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Casanova, L.M.; Gerba, C.P.; Karpiscak, M. Chemical and microbial characterization of household graywater. Environ. Sci. Health 2001, A36, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gilboa, Y.; Friedler, E. UV disinfection of rbc-treated light greywater effluent: Kinetics, survival and regrowth of selected microorganisms. Water Res. 2007, 42, 1043–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Burrows, W.D.; Schmidt, M.O.; Carnevale, R.M.; Schaub, S.A. Nonpotable reuse: Development of health criteria and technologies for shower water recycle. Water Sci. Technol. 1991, 24, 81–88. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gross, A.; Kaplan, D.; Baker, K. Removal of chemical and microbiological contaminants from domestic greywater using a recycled vertical flow bioreactor (rvfb). Ecol. Eng. 2007, 31, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Maimon, A.; Friedler, E.; Gross, A. Parameters affecting greywater quality and its safety for reuse. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 487, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ramsey, M.M.; Freire, M.O.; Gabrilska, R.A.; Rumbaugh, K.P.; Lemon, K.P. Staphylococcus aureus shifts toward commensalism in response to Corynebacterium species. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Arikawa, J.; Ishibashi, M.; Kawashima, M.; Takagi, Y.; Ichikawa, Y.; Imokawa, G. Decreased levels of sphingosine, a natural antimicrobial agent, may be associated with vulnerability of the stratum corneum from patients with atopic dermatitis to colonization by Staphylococcus aureus. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2002, 119, 433–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Coates, R.; Moran, J.; Horsburgh, M.J. Staphylococci: Colonizers and pathogens of human skin. Future Microbiol. 2014, 9, 75–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Winward, G.P.; Avery, L.M.; Stephenson, T.; Jefferson, B. Ultraviolet (UV) disinfection of grey water: Particle size effects. Environ. Technol. 2008, 29, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ramos, S.; Homem, V.; Alves, A.; Santos, L. A review of organic UV-filters in wastewater treatment plants. Environ. Int. 2016, 86, 24–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Ultraviolet Disinfection Guidance Manual for the Final Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
  23. NSF International. NSF/ANSI 55: Ultraviolet Microbiological Water Treatment Systems; NSF International: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ewald, S. Evaluation of a rapid tube lysostaphin test to differentiate between staphylococci and micrococci. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1986, 3, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hardy Diagnostics. Lysostaphin Differentiation Disks: Instructions for Use. Available online: (accessed on 10 March 2017).
  26. Palmquist, H.; Hanæus, J. Hazardous substances in separately collected grey- and blackwater from ordinary swedish households. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 348, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. USEPA Manual of Methods for Virology; Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2001; Chapter 16.
  28. Liu, W.J.; Zhang, Y.J. Effects of UV intensity and water turbidity on microbial indicator inactivation. J. Environ. Sci. (China) 2006, 18, 650–653. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Abshire, R.L.; Dunton, H. Resistance of selected strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to low-intensity ultravioloet radiation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1981, 41, 1419–1423. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Rodríguez, M.; Núñez, F.; Córdoba, J.J.; Sanabria, C.; Bermúdez, E.; Asensio, M.A. Characterization of Staphylococcus spp. and Micrococcus spp. isolated from Iberian ham throughout the ripening process. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1994, 24, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Quiloan, M.L.G.; Vu, J.; Carvalho, J. Enterococcus faecalis can be distinguished from Enterococcus faecium via differential susceptibility to antibiotics and growth and fermentation characteristics on mannitol salt agar. Front. Biol. 2012, 7, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kloos, W.E.; Musselwhite, M.S. Distribution and persistence of Staphylococcus and Micrococcus species and other aerobic bacteria on human skin. Appl. Microbiol. 1975, 30, 381–395. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Kasprzyk-Hordern, B.; Dinsdale, R.M.; Guwy, A.J. The removal of pharmaceuticals, personal care products, endocrine disruptors and illicit drugs during wastewater treatment and its impact on the quality of receiving waters. Water Res. 2009, 43, 363–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Christian, D. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products: An overview. Pipeline 2007, 18, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Hand-rinse bacteria exposed to 256 nm UV-C irradiation: (a) Log10 CFU·100 mL−1 on TSA (T-TSA) and total staphylococci on MSA (TS-MSA) before and after exposure to dose of 220 mJ·cm−2 (N = 5); (b) Log10 reduction on T-TSA and TS-MSA (N = 5).
Figure 1. Hand-rinse bacteria exposed to 256 nm UV-C irradiation: (a) Log10 CFU·100 mL−1 on TSA (T-TSA) and total staphylococci on MSA (TS-MSA) before and after exposure to dose of 220 mJ·cm−2 (N = 5); (b) Log10 reduction on T-TSA and TS-MSA (N = 5).
Water 09 00963 g001
Figure 2. Effects of oxybenzone when irradiating suspended S. aureus at 11.8 mJ·cm−2: (a) 10 mg·L−1 oxybenzone; (b) 1 mg·L−1 oxybenzone.
Figure 2. Effects of oxybenzone when irradiating suspended S. aureus at 11.8 mJ·cm−2: (a) 10 mg·L−1 oxybenzone; (b) 1 mg·L−1 oxybenzone.
Water 09 00963 g002
Table 1. Log10 colony forming units per 100 mL of raw hand-rinse water before and after exposure.
Table 1. Log10 colony forming units per 100 mL of raw hand-rinse water before and after exposure.
AssayLog10 CFU·100 mL−1 ± (SD)
0 mJ·cm−2220 mJ·cm−2Reduction
T-TSA6.2 ± (0.3)4.1 ± (0.5)2.1 ± (0.3)
TS-MSA6.0 ± (0.4)3.8 ± (0.6)2.2 ± (0.3)
Paired t-test0.04 a0.04 a0.112 a
Note: a Two-tailed p-value comparing means.
Table 2. Log10 reduction of the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and wild Staphylococcus isolates.
Table 2. Log10 reduction of the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and wild Staphylococcus isolates.
BacteriaLog10 Reduction at 11.0 mJ·cm−2 ± (SD)
S. aureus (ATCC 25923)4.9 ± (0.0)
S. aureus (i)>5.2
S. capitis (ii)>5.7
S. capitis (iii)>6.3
S. lentus (unknown)5.0 ± (0.0)
S. epidermidis (ii)>5.7
S. epidermidis (iiia)>6.1
S. epidermidis (iiib)>5.6
S. haemolyticus (iv)3.4 ± (0.1)
S. haemolyticus (v)4.4 ± (0.1)
S. hominis (v)1.6 ± (0.1)
S. pasteuri (iii)>5.8
S. pasteuri (iv)>5.5
S. pasteuri (v)5.1 ± (0.1)
S. warneri (i)>5.7
S. warneri (ii)>5.5
Note: i–v refers to the five participants from whom the greywater isolates were derived.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shoults, D.C.; Ashbolt, N.J. UV Disinfection of Hand-Rinse Greywater and Performance Testing Using Indigenous Staphylococcus spp. Water 2017, 9, 963.

AMA Style

Shoults DC, Ashbolt NJ. UV Disinfection of Hand-Rinse Greywater and Performance Testing Using Indigenous Staphylococcus spp. Water. 2017; 9(12):963.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shoults, David C., and Nicholas J. Ashbolt. 2017. "UV Disinfection of Hand-Rinse Greywater and Performance Testing Using Indigenous Staphylococcus spp." Water 9, no. 12: 963.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop