Learning for Transformation of Water Governance: Reflections on Design from the Climate Change Adaptation and Water Governance (CADWAGO) Project
2.1. Research Focus and Overall Approach
- What changes are needed in the existing conceptualisation and framing of different modes of water governance to enable systemic and adaptive responses to climate change?
- What are the social and institutional barriers and opportunities for adaptive and systemic responses to climate change within existing water governance regimes?
- What practices and processes are necessary to foster systemic and adaptive responses within water governance? Source: .
2.2. Role of Researchers in the Design Process
2.3. Design for Governance Learning
2.3.1. Design of Governance Learning Events
- Principle 1: participatory design for learning to enable multiple perspectives on relevant issues to be understood
- Principle 2: building on the lessons from the past, including an already substantial body of research cases and governance praxis undertaken by partners to create a forum and dialogue among researchers and stakeholders at different levels and scales
- Principle 3: designing an enabling environment for co-production of knowledge to emerge.
- Governance Learning Event 1: Sweden
- Governance Learning Event 2: UK
- Governance Learning Event 3: Italy
- ‘Interim’ Learning Events
2.3.2. Online Media
3.1. Outcomes from the Governance Learning Events
(i) Event 1—The Swedish Event
(ii) Event 2—The UK Event
- roles and responsibilities in changing dynamic of water governance;
- breaking-out of silos and governance structures;
- mismatch between expectations of new processes and the outcomes;
- water crises as opportunities for governance change;
- knowing and learning about water and its purpose; and
- planning under conditions of uncertainty.
(iii) Event 3—The Italian Event
(iv) Interim Events
3.2. Outcomes of Online Activities
3.3. Findings on Researchers’ Roles and Experiences
3.4. Tools and Techniques
4.1. Conceptualising Governance Learning as an Interactive Co-Production Process
4.2. Our Process of Design for Learning
4.3. Significance of Our Results
4.4. Addressing Challenges of Co-Production of Knowledge
4.5. A Call for Increased Attention on Design for Learning
Conflicts of Interest
- Franks, T.; Cleaver, F. Water governance and poverty: A framework for analysis. Prog. Dev. Stud. 2007, 7, 291–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). OECD Principles on Water Governance. OECD Publishing. 2015. Available online: http://www.gwp.org/Global/ToolBox/References/OECD-Principles-on-Water-Governance-brochure.pdf (accessed on 2 August 2016).
- Rogers, P.; Hall, A.W. Effective Water Governance; TEC Background Papers No. 7; Global Water Partnership Technical Committee: Stockholm, Sweden, 2003; Available online: http://www.gwp.org/global/toolbox/publications/background%20papers/07%20effective%20water%20governance%20(2003)%20english.pdf (accessed on 2 August 2016).
- Pahl-Wostl, C.; Conca, K.; Kramer, A.; Maestu, J.; Schmidt, F. Missing links in global water governance: A processes-oriented analysis. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18, 344–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ison, R.L.; Collins, K.B.; Wallis, P.J. Institutionalising social learning: Towards systemic and adaptive governance. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 53, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pahl-Wostl, C.; Vörösmarty, C.; Bhaduri, A.; Bogardi, J.; Rockström, J.; Alcamo, J. Towards a sustainable water future: Shaping the next decade of global water research. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2013, 5, 708–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CADWAGO Website. Available online: http://www.cadwago.net/?page_id=152 (accessed on 2 August 2016).
- Plummer, R.; Armitage, D. Integrating perspectives on adaptive capacity and environmental governance. In Adaptive Capacity and Environmental Governance; Plummer, R., Armitage, D., Eds.; Springer Series on Environmental Management; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- Adger, W.N. Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim. Chang. 2009, 93, 335–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IHDP (International Human Dimensions Programme). Knowledge, Learning and Societal Change: Finding Paths to a Sustainable Future. Science Plan for a cross-cutting core project of the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change. 2011. Available online: http://www.ihdp.unu.edu/docs/Publications/KLSC/KLSC%20FINAL%20Science%20Plan%2004.09.11.pdf (accessed on 2 August 2016).
- Diduck, A. The learning dimension of adaptive capacity: Untangling the multi-level connections. In Adaptive Capacity and Environmental Governance; Plummer, R., Armitage, D., Eds.; Springer Series on Environmental Management; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 199–222. [Google Scholar]
- Pelling, M.; High, C.; Dearing, J.; Smith, J. Shadow spaces for social learning: A relational understanding of adaptive capacity to climate change within organisations. Environ. Plan. A 2008, 40, 867–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tschakert, P.; Dietrich, K.A. Anticipatory learning for climate change adaptation and resilience. Ecol. Soc. 2010, 15, 299–305. [Google Scholar]
- Berkhout, F.; Hertin, J.; Gann, D.M. Learning to Adapt: Organisational Adaptation to Climate Change Impacts. Clim. Chang. 2006, 78, 135–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- McLoughlin, C.A.; Thoms, M.C. Integrative learning for practicing adaptive resource management. Ecol. Soc. 2015, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steyaert, P.; Jiggins, J. Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: A synthesis of SLIM’s lesson for research, policy and practice. Environ. Sci. Policy 2007, 10, 575–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blackmore, C. What kinds of knowledge, knowing and learning are required for addressing resource dilemmas?—A theoretical overview. Environ. Sci. Policy 2007, 10, 512–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collins, K. Designing social learning systems for integrating social sciences into policy processes: Some experiences of water managing. In Understanding Society and Natural Resources: Forging New Strands of Integration across the Social Sciences; Manfredo, M.J., Vaske, J.J., Rechkemmer, A., Duke, E.A., Eds.; Springer: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 229–251. [Google Scholar]
- Cundill, G.; Rodela, R. A search for coherence: Social learning in natural resource management. In (Re) Views on Social Learning Literature: A Monograph for Social Learning Researchers in Natural Resources Management and Environmental Education; Lotz-Sisitka, H.B., Ed.; Environmental Learning Research Centre, Rhodes University/EEASA/SADC REEP: Grahamstown/Howick, South Africa, 2012; pp. 31–38. [Google Scholar]
- Armitage, D.; de Loë, R.C.; Morris, M.; Edwards, T.W.D.; Gerlak, A.K.; Hall, R.I.; Huitema, D.; Ison, R.; Livingstone, D.; MacDonald, G.; et al. Science–policy processes for transboundary water governance. Ambio J. Hum. Environ. 2015, 44, 353–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Westberg, L.; Polk, M. The role of learning in transdisciplinary research: Moving from a normative concept to an analytical tool through a practice-based approach. Sustain. Sci. 2016, 11, 385–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tengö, M.; Brondizio, E.S.; Elmqvist, T.; Malmer, P.; Spierenburg, M. Connecting diverse knowledge systems for enhanced ecosystem governance: The multiple evidence base approach. Ambio J. Hum. Environ. 2014, 43, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Pohl, C.; Rist, S.; Zimmermann, A.; Fry, P.; Gurung, G.S.; Schneider, F.; Speranza, C.I.; Kiteme, B.; Boillat, S.; Serrano, E.; et al. Researchers roles in knowledge coproduction: Experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal. Sci. Public Policy 2010, 37, 267–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Bommel, S.V.; Röling, N.; Aarts, N.; Turnhout, E. Social learning for solving complex problems. Environ. Policy Gov. 2009, 19, 400–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colvin, J.; Blackmore, C.; Chimbuya, S.; Collins, K.; Dent, M.; Goss, J.; Ison, R.; Roggero, P.P.; Seddaiu, G. In search of systemic innovation for sustainable development: A design praxis emerging from a decade of social learning inquiry. Res. Policy 2014, 43, 760–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stainton-Rogers, W. Logics of enquiry. In Doing Postgraduate Research, 2nd ed.; Potter, S., Ed.; Sage Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2006; pp. 73–91. [Google Scholar]
- Schwartz-Shea, P.; Yanow, D. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Ison, R.; Blackmore, C.; Collins, K.; Furniss, P. Systemic environmental decision making: Designing learning systems. Kybernetes 2007, 36, 1340–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ison, R. Systems Practice: How to Act in a Climate-Change World; Springer: London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Blackmore, C. (Ed.) Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice; Springer: London, UK, 2010.
- Wenger, E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Lave, J.; Wenger, E. Situated Learning Legitimate Peripheral Participation; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Wenger, E.; McDermott, R.; Snyder, W.M. Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge; Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Rockström, J.; Steffen, W.; Noone, K.; Persson, Å.; Chapin, F.S., III; Lambin, E.F.; Lenton, T.M.; Scheffer, M.; Folke, C.; Schellnhuber, H.J.; et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 2009, 461, 472–475. [Google Scholar]
- The Open University. T863 Techniques for Environmental Decision Making; The Open University: Milton Keynes, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Ramage, M.; Shipp, K. Systems Thinkers; Open University/Springer: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Armson, R. Growing Wings on the Way: Systems Thinking for Messy Situations; Triarchy Press: Axminster, Devon, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Checkland, P.; Scholes, J. Soft Systems Methodology in Action, 2nd ed.; John Wiley: Chichester, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Foster, N.; Collins, K.; Blackmore, C.; Ison, R. Water Governance in England: Improving Understandings and Practices through Systemic Co-Inquiry; Workshop Report; Open University: Milton Keynes, UK, 2015; Available online: https://mcs.open.ac.uk/cadwago/full_report.pdf (accessed on 2 August 2016).
- Foster, N.; Collins, K.; Blackmore, C.; Ison, R.; On Behalf of the CADWAGO Project Team. CADWAGO Governance Learning Workshop: London, UK, 24 June 2014. Available online: http://www.cadwago.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Governance-learning-workshop-report-London-2014.pdf (accessed on 2 August 2016).
- CADWAGO. Final Water Governance Learning Workshop Report. 2015. Available online: http://www.cadwago.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/CADWAGO-final-learning-event-report.pdf (accessed on 2 August 2016).
- Maurizi, S.; Zuin, O.; Ruiu, M.L.; Seddaiu, G.; Sassu, S.; Roggero, P.P. “La Rasgioni”: Lessons learned from a creative re-interpretation of traditional practices to mediate conflicts between formal institutions and farmers interests in the context of agricultural water governance issues. In preparation.
- Toderi, M.; Powell, N.; Seddaiu, G.; Roggero, P.P.; Gibbon, D. Combining social learning with agro-ecological research practice for more effective management of nitrate pollution. Environ. Sci. Policy 2007, 10, 551–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiu, M.L.; Maurizi, S.; Nguyen Thi, P.L.; Roggero, P.P.; Seddaiu, G. Looking for ‘win-win’ responses for the water governance: Action research in the Arborea district (Oristano). Agriregionieuropa 2014, 10. Available online: http://agriregionieuropa.univpm.it/it/content/article/31/37/alla-ricerca-di-risposte-win-win-la-governance-dellacqua-action-research-nel (accessed on 30 October 2016). [Google Scholar]
- Maurizi, S. Come Gestire L’acqua la Lezione che Arriva Dalle Comunità Locali. La Nuova Sardegna 2015. Available online: http://lanuovasardegna.gelocal.it/regione/2015/11/10/news/come-gestire-l-acqua-la-lezione-che-arriva-dalle-comunita-locali-1.12422905 (accessed on 2 August 2016). [Google Scholar]
- Roggero, P.P. “MusicAcqua” Concert: Musical Variations on Climate. CADWAGO Blog. 2015. Available online: http://www.cadwago.net/?p=679 (accessed on 2 August 2016).
- Roggero, P.P. “La Rasgioni”—The Water Court. CADWAGO Blog. 2015. Available online: http://www.cadwago.net/?p=667 (accessed on 2 August 2016).
- Collins, K.B.; Ison, R.L. Jumping off Arnstein’s ladder: Social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environ. Policy Gov. 2009, 19, 358–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Laat, M.F.; Simons, P.R.J. Collective learning: Theoretical perspectives and ways to support networked learning. Eur. J. Vocat. Train. 2002, 27, 13–24. [Google Scholar]
- De Bruin, A. A Learning Process. CADWAGO Blog. 2015. Available online: http://www.cadwago.net/?p=637 (accessed on 2 August 2016).
- De Bruin, A. Local Perspectives on Storm Water Solutions. CADWAGO Blog. 2015. Available online: http://www.cadwago.net/?p=643 (accessed on 2 August 2016).
- Foster, N.; Collins, K.; Ison, R.; Blackmore, C. Water governance in England: Improving understandings and practices through systemic co-inquiry. Water 2016. under review. [Google Scholar]
- Bennett, N.; Wise, C.; Woods, P.A.; Harvey, J.A. Distributed Leadership: A Review of Literature; National College for School Leadership: Nottingham, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Gronn, P. Distributed Leadership. In Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration; Leithwood, K., Hallinger, P., Seashore-Louis, K., Furman-Brown, G., Gronn, P., Mulford, W., Riley, K., Eds.; Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002; Part 2, Section 4; pp. 653–696. [Google Scholar]
- Leeuwis, C.; van der Ban, A. Communication for Rural Innovation; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Leeuwis, C.; Aarts, N. Rethinking communication in innovation processes: Creating space for change in complex systems. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 2011, 17, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akrich, M.; Callon, M.; Latour, B.; Monaghan, A. The key to success in innovation part I: The art of interessement. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 2002, 6, 187–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akrich, M.; Callon, M.; Latour, B. The key to success in innovation part II: The art of choosing good spokespersons. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 2002, 6, 207–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leeuwis, C. Changing views of agricultural innovation: Implications for communicative intervention and science. In Research to Impact: Case Studies for Natural Resource Management for Irrigated Rice in Asia; International Rice Research Institute: Manila, Phillipines, 2010; pp. 15–32. [Google Scholar]
- Furniss, P.; Blackmore, C. Tools and techniques for environmental decision making. In Environment, Development, and Sustainability: Perspectives and Cases from around the World; Wilson, G., Furniss, P., Kimbowa, R., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2009; pp. 250–258. [Google Scholar]
- Keen, M.; Brown, V.A.; Dyball, R. (Eds.) Social Learning in Environmental Management; Earthscan: London, UK, 2005.
- Leeuwis, C.; Pyburn, R. (Eds.) Wheel-Barrows Full of Frogs—Social Learning in Rural Resource Management; Van Gorcum Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2002.
- Wals, A.J. (Ed.) Social Learning towards a Sustainable World; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2007.
- International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). Tools for supporting sustainable natural resource management and livelihoods. In Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) 66; IIED: London, UK, 2007; Available online: http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/14620IIED.pdf (accessed on 7 July 2016).
- Turnhout, E.; van Bommel, S.; Aarts, N. How participation creates citizens: Participatory governance as performative practice. Ecol. Soc. 2010, 15, 299–305. [Google Scholar]
- Carr, G.; Blöschl, G.; Loucks, D.P. Evaluating participation in water resource management: A review. Water Resour. Res. 2012, 48, W11401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woodhill, J. Sustainability, social learning and the democratic imperative: Lessons from the Australian Landcare movement. In Wheelbarrows Full of Frogs–Social Learning in Rural Resource Management; Leeuwis, C., Pyburn, R., Eds.; Koninklijke Van Gorcum BV: Assen, The Netherlands, 2002; pp. 317–331. [Google Scholar]
- Sterling, S. Whole Systems Thinking as a Basis for Paradigm Change in Education: Explorations in the Context of Sustainability. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bath, Bath, UK, 2003. Available online: http://www.bath.ac.uk/cree/sterling/sterlingthesis.pdf (accessed on 2 August 2016). [Google Scholar]
- Pahl-Wostl, C.; Craps, M.; Dewulf, A.; Mostert, E.; Tabara, D.; Taillieu, T. Social learning and water resources management. Ecol. Soc. 2007, 12, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- Van Bommel, S.; Blackmore, C.; de Vries, J. Performing and orchestrating governance learning in practice. Outlook Agric. 2016, in press. [Google Scholar]
- Coyne, R.; Snodgrass, A. Is designing mysterious? Challenging the dual knowledge thesis. Des. Stud. 1991, 12, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schön, D. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action; Ashgate: Aldershot, UK, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Cross, N. Forty years of design research. Des. Stud. 2007, 28, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wenger-Trayner, E.; Wenger-Trayner, B. Learning in a Landscape of practice—A framework. In Learning in Landscapes of Practice: Boundaries, Identity and Knowledgeability in Practice-Based Learning; Wenger, T.E., Fenton-O’Creevy, M., Hutchinson, S., Kubiak, C., Wenger-Trayner, B., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2015; pp. 13–29. [Google Scholar]
|Event No.||Concepts for Framing Activity||Tools and Techniques for Enabling Co-Learning|
posters and carousel process
|Event 2||systems thinking in practice|
formulations of systems of interest
conceptual activity models
individual and concerted actions
feedback to local stakeholders–directly and after reflection
© 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Blackmore, C.; Van Bommel, S.; De Bruin, A.; De Vries, J.; Westberg, L.; Powell, N.; Foster, N.; Collins, K.; Roggero, P.P.; Seddaiu, G. Learning for Transformation of Water Governance: Reflections on Design from the Climate Change Adaptation and Water Governance (CADWAGO) Project. Water 2016, 8, 510. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8110510
Blackmore C, Van Bommel S, De Bruin A, De Vries J, Westberg L, Powell N, Foster N, Collins K, Roggero PP, Seddaiu G. Learning for Transformation of Water Governance: Reflections on Design from the Climate Change Adaptation and Water Governance (CADWAGO) Project. Water. 2016; 8(11):510. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8110510Chicago/Turabian Style
Blackmore, Chris, Severine Van Bommel, Annemarieke De Bruin, Jasper De Vries, Lotten Westberg, Neil Powell, Natalie Foster, Kevin Collins, Pier Paolo Roggero, and Giovanna Seddaiu. 2016. "Learning for Transformation of Water Governance: Reflections on Design from the Climate Change Adaptation and Water Governance (CADWAGO) Project" Water 8, no. 11: 510. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8110510