Next Article in Journal
Evolution of Marine Organisms under Climate Change at Different Levels of Biological Organisation
Next Article in Special Issue
Suitability of a Coupled Hydrodynamic Water Quality Model to Predict Changes in Water Quality from Altered Meteorological Boundary Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Hydrologic Tools and Monitoring to Support Managed Aquifer Recharge Decision Making in the Upper San Pedro River, Arizona, USA
Previous Article in Special Issue
Understanding Irrigator Bidding Behavior in Australian Water Markets in Response to Uncertainty
Article

Assessment of Short Term Rainfall and Stream Flows in South Australia

1
Centre for Water Management and Reuse (CWMR), School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
2
CSIRO Computational Informatics (CCI), Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2014, 6(11), 3528-3544; https://doi.org/10.3390/w6113528
Received: 12 June 2014 / Revised: 17 September 2014 / Accepted: 12 November 2014 / Published: 19 November 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Resources in a Variable and Changing Climate)
The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between rainfall and stream flow at Broughton River in Mooroola, Torrance River in Mount Pleasant, and Wakefield River near Rhyine, in South Australia, from 1990 to 2010. Initially, we present a short term relationship between rainfall and stream flow, in terms of correlations, lagged correlations, and estimated variability between wavelet coefficients at each level. A deterministic regression based response model is used to detect linear, quadratic and polynomial trends, while allowing for seasonality effects. Antecedent rainfall data were considered to predict stream flow. The best fitting model was selected based on maximum adjusted R2 values (R2adj ), minimum sigma square (σ2), and a minimum Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The best performance in the response model is lag rainfall, which indicates at least one day and up to 7 days (past) difference in rainfall, including offset cross products of lag rainfall. With the inclusion of antecedent stream flow as an input with one day time lag, the result shows a significant improvement of the R2adj values from 0.18, 0.26 and 0.14 to 0.35, 0.42 and 0.21 at Broughton River, Torrance River and Wakefield River, respectively. A benchmark comparison was made with an Artificial Neural Network analysis. The optimization strategy involved adopting a minimum mean absolute error (MAE). View Full-Text
Keywords: Artificial Neural Network; lag response model; rainfall and stream flow; wavelet coefficient; Akaike Information Criterion Artificial Neural Network; lag response model; rainfall and stream flow; wavelet coefficient; Akaike Information Criterion
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kamruzzaman, M.; Shahriar, M.S.; Beecham, S. Assessment of Short Term Rainfall and Stream Flows in South Australia. Water 2014, 6, 3528-3544. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6113528

AMA Style

Kamruzzaman M, Shahriar MS, Beecham S. Assessment of Short Term Rainfall and Stream Flows in South Australia. Water. 2014; 6(11):3528-3544. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6113528

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kamruzzaman, Mohammad, Md S. Shahriar, and Simon Beecham. 2014. "Assessment of Short Term Rainfall and Stream Flows in South Australia" Water 6, no. 11: 3528-3544. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6113528

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop