Next Article in Journal
Increasing River Flows in the Sahel?
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrologic Restoration in the Urban Environment Using Green Roofs
Article

Comparison of Three Systems for Biological Greywater Treatment

1
Wetsus, Centre of Excellence for Sustainable Water Technology, P.O. Box 1113, 8900CC, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
2
Sub-department Environmental Technology, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 8129, 6700EV Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2010, 2(2), 155-169; https://doi.org/10.3390/w2020155
Received: 3 February 2010 / Revised: 14 April 2010 / Accepted: 15 April 2010 / Published: 22 April 2010
Greywater consists of household wastewater excluding toilet discharges. Three systems were compared for the biological treatment of greywater at a similar hydraulic retention time of approximately 12–13 hours. These systems were aerobic treatment in a sequencing batch reactor, anaerobic treatment in an up-flow anaerobic blanket reactor and combined anaerobic-aerobic treatment (up-flow anaerobic blanket reactor + sequencing batch reactor). Aerobic conditions resulted in a COD removal of 90%, which was significantly higher than 51% removal by anaerobic treatment. The low removal in the anaerobic reactor may have been caused by high concentration of anionic surfactants in the influent (43.5 mg/L) and a poor removal of the colloidal fraction of the COD in up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. Combined aerobic-anaerobic treatment accomplished a COD removal of 89%, similar to the aerobic treatment alone. Greywater methanization was 32% for the anaerobic system and 25% for the anaerobic-aerobic system, yielding a small amount of energy. Therefore, anaerobic pre-treatment is not feasible and an aerobic system is preferred for the treatment of greywater. View Full-Text
Keywords: aerobic treatment; anaerobic treatment; greywater; surfactants; sludge yield aerobic treatment; anaerobic treatment; greywater; surfactants; sludge yield
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Hernández Leal, L.; Temmink, H.; Zeeman, G.; Buisman, C.J.N. Comparison of Three Systems for Biological Greywater Treatment. Water 2010, 2, 155-169. https://doi.org/10.3390/w2020155

AMA Style

Hernández Leal L, Temmink H, Zeeman G, Buisman CJN. Comparison of Three Systems for Biological Greywater Treatment. Water. 2010; 2(2):155-169. https://doi.org/10.3390/w2020155

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hernández Leal, Lucía, Hardy Temmink, Grietje Zeeman, and Cees J. N. Buisman. 2010. "Comparison of Three Systems for Biological Greywater Treatment" Water 2, no. 2: 155-169. https://doi.org/10.3390/w2020155

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop