Next Article in Journal
Groundwater Flow Fields and Patterns in Heterogeneous Aquifer Induced by Mine Water Injection and Storage Under Different Well Configurations
Previous Article in Journal
An Integrated Methodology for Novel Algorithmic Modeling of Non-Spherical Particle Terminal Settling Velocities and Comprehensive Digital Image Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Geothermal Reservoir Parameter Identification by Wellbore–Reservoir Integrated Fluid and Heat Transport Modeling

1
School of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
2
School of Civil Engineering, Huzhou Vocational and Technical College, Huzhou 313000, China
3
Nuclear Industry Huzhou Survey Planning Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., Huzhou 313000, China
4
Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
5
Jiamushi Water Conservancy Project Quality and Safety Supervision Technical Center, Jiamushi 154000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2025, 17(22), 3269; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17223269 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 17 October 2025 / Revised: 9 November 2025 / Accepted: 13 November 2025 / Published: 15 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Hydrogeology)

Abstract

Efficient development of karst geothermal resources relies on the accurate identification of thermophysical and hydrogeological parameters. In this paper, the integrated wellbore–reservoir model of fluid and heat transport is applied to identify hydrothermal parameters of the karst geothermal system in Tianjin, China, based on multi-type field test data. A natural state model is conducted by fitting steady-state borehole temperature measurement results to identify formation thermal conductivity, while reservoir permeability is determined via the Gauss–Marquardt–Levenberg optimization algorithm based on dynamic temperature and pressure data from pumping tests. The parameter identification results indicate a reservoir permeability of 5.25 × 10−14 m2 and a corrected bottom-hole temperature of 109 °C. Subsequently, productivity optimization for actual heating demands (1.33 × 105 m2) yields an optimal heat extraction efficiency of 6.17 MW, with a flow rate of 80 m3/h, an injection well perforated length of 388 m, and an injection temperature of 30 °C. Additionally, addressing reservoir heterogeneity, the study finds that high-permeability zones between wells significantly shorten the safe operation duration of geothermal doublets, and reducing flow rate can mitigate thermal breakthrough risk to a certain extent.
Keywords: geothermal energy production; numerical modeling; parameter identification; integrated wellbore–reservoir model; productivity optimization geothermal energy production; numerical modeling; parameter identification; integrated wellbore–reservoir model; productivity optimization

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, F.; Guo, X.; Xing, Z.; Cui, H.; Zhang, X. Geothermal Reservoir Parameter Identification by Wellbore–Reservoir Integrated Fluid and Heat Transport Modeling. Water 2025, 17, 3269. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17223269

AMA Style

Li F, Guo X, Xing Z, Cui H, Zhang X. Geothermal Reservoir Parameter Identification by Wellbore–Reservoir Integrated Fluid and Heat Transport Modeling. Water. 2025; 17(22):3269. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17223269

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Fengyu, Xia Guo, Zhenxiang Xing, Haitao Cui, and Xi Zhang. 2025. "Geothermal Reservoir Parameter Identification by Wellbore–Reservoir Integrated Fluid and Heat Transport Modeling" Water 17, no. 22: 3269. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17223269

APA Style

Li, F., Guo, X., Xing, Z., Cui, H., & Zhang, X. (2025). Geothermal Reservoir Parameter Identification by Wellbore–Reservoir Integrated Fluid and Heat Transport Modeling. Water, 17(22), 3269. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17223269

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop