Next Article in Journal
Exposure of Greek Ports to Marine Flooding and Extreme Heat Under Climate Change: An Assessment
Previous Article in Journal
Hydroclimatic Variability of the Grey River Basin (Chilean Patagonia): Trends and Relationship with Large-Scale Climatic Phenomena
Previous Article in Special Issue
PFOA and PFOS Pollution in Surface Waters and Surface Water Fish
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Toxic Pollutants in Water: Health Risk Assessment and Removal

1
Yunnan Provincial Key Lab of Soil Carbon Sequestration and Pollution Control, Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
2
Yunnan International Joint Laboratory for Emission Reduction and Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils, Kunming 650500, China
3
Shanghai Technical Service Platform for Pollution Control and Resource Utilization of Organic Wastes, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention (LAP3), Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China
4
Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, China
5
Sustainable Development Study Centre, Government College University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
6
School of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2025, 17(13), 1896; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131896
Submission received: 6 June 2025 / Accepted: 23 June 2025 / Published: 26 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Toxic Pollutants in Water: Health Risk Assessment and Removal)

1. Introduction

Clean water is a fundamental human right; however, it is increasingly under threat from toxic pollutants that infiltrate rivers, lakes, groundwater, and even treated drinking water supplies [1]. As industrialization accelerates and agricultural practices intensify, these contaminants originate from multiple sources, such as industrial effluents, agricultural runoff, improper waste disposal, aging infrastructure, and household products [2,3]. Once released into environment, many of these pollutants do not degrade easily and can bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms, eventually entering the human food chain and causing global public health crises [4,5]. Challenges lie not only in identifying these toxins but also in assessing their risks to human health and implementing effective strategies for their removal [6]. Water pollution is no longer confined to visible signs, such as oil slicks or floating debris. Modern pollutants are often invisible, insidious, and persistent in nature. Chronic occurrence of toxic pollutants, including heavy metals (HMs; Pb, Ni, As, Hg, Cd, Co, and Cu), dyes, and organic contaminants such as pharmaceutical residues, pesticides, and perfluoroalkyl and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS; perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorosulfonic acid (PFOS)), in water is a significant environmental concern due to their persistence, toxicity, and potential risks to humans and ecosystems [7,8,9].
The health consequences of long-term exposure to low levels of toxic pollutants are profound [10]. Unlike acute illnesses caused by pathogens, the effects of chemical contamination often manifest over years or decades. Exposure to HMs has been linked to neurological disorders, kidney damage, developmental delays in children, and cancer [11]. Organic compounds and PFAS, known as forever chemicals, are associated with immune dysfunction, hormonal disruption, and increased cancer risk [12,13]. In many developing regions, contaminated water remains a primary source of disease and mortality, particularly among children [14]. Assessing the health risks posed by these pollutants requires robust scientific methodologies.
One of the major hurdles in managing water pollution is the sheer diversity and evolving nature of the contaminants. Regulatory frameworks often lag behind scientific discoveries, leaving many emerging pollutants unregulated. For instance, while some countries have set limits on certain organic compounds, thousands of them remain unmonitored. Moreover, detection technologies must keep pace with this rapidly evolving landscape. Traditional water testing methods may not be sufficiently sensitive to detect trace amounts of emerging contaminants. Advanced analytical techniques can help to bridge this gap; however, their widespread implementation remains costly and technically demanding. Addressing the issues of toxic pollutants in water requires a multi-pronged approach that combines prevention, treatment, and policy reform [7]. Adsorption with biochar and activated carbon [15,16], reverse osmosis [17], membrane filtration [18], bioremediation [19], and advanced oxidation processes [20] have proven effective in removing a wide range of contaminants. Nanotechnology [21] and (bio)remediation [22], which use microbes or plants to absorb or break down toxins, are promising frontiers in sustainable water purification. Furthermore, community-based solutions, such as rainwater harvesting, decentralized filtration systems, and green infrastructure, can help to reduce reliance on centralized water treatment plants and mitigate contamination at the local level.
As an effort to promote sustainable water management and environmental protection, this Special Issue, titled “Toxic Pollutants in Water: Health Risk Assessment and Removal”, of Water aimed to advance our understanding and remediation of water contamination by bringing together multidisciplinary research on pollutant sources, health risks, and innovative removal techniques. This Special Issue covered a range of topics related to toxic pollutant (HMs, dyes, and organic contaminants) contamination in water, approaches for toxic pollutant sources, environmental fate, health risk assessment, environmental composites/nanoparticles for toxic pollutant removal, and water treatment techniques, i.e., adsorption, desalination, catalytic reduction, advanced oxidation, bioremediation, and membrane filtration.

2. Findings Reported in This Special Issue

This Special Issue comprises nine articles, including eight research articles and one review article. The topic of “Toxic Pollutants in Water: Health Risk Assessment and Removal” is discussed in the following articles: Ikizoglu et al. (2024) investigated the pollution of two PFAS types, namely PFOA and PFOS, both of which are banned by the Stockholm Convention, in surface waters and surface water fish in the most densely populated and industrial region in Turkey [contribution 1]. Shaffique et al. (2024) explored research developments in migratory water birds, focusing on indicators of HM (Ni, Cu, Co, Zn, Pb, Cd, and Mn) pollution in the inland wetland resources of Punjab, Pakistan [contribution 2]. Jing et al. (2024) evaluated the ecological impact of wastewater discharges on microbial and contaminant dynamics in rivers to optimize wastewater treatment processes to better comply with Chinese environmental quality standards [contribution 3]. Piccardo et al. (2024) assessed the first evidence of the water bioremediation potential of Ficopomatus enigmaticus (Fauvel 1923), both living and dead, to remove contaminants and enhance water quality [contribution 4]. Medina Salas et al. (2023) explored the ZnO-CuO nanocomposite’s potential as an efficient adsorbent for As(III) removal from water, showing that the straightforward and energy-efficient production of nanocomposite makes it promising for real-world water treatments [contribution 5]. Alhamzah et al. (2023) studied the control of bromate, a potentially carcinogenic disinfection by-product; its formation in desalinated seawater production; and its transmission with ammoniation in Makkah, Saudi Arabia [contribution 6]. Cáceda Quiroz et al. (2023) studied cyanide bioremediation carried out by Bacillus subtilis under alkaline conditions using cyanide concentrations and experimental conditions demonstrative of real mining wastewaters [contribution 7]. Mahringer et al. (2023) evaluated the redox behavior of Cr with redox-active substances (O2, NO3, Fe2+, MnO2) in reduction, coagulation, and biotic filtration drinking water treatment at pilot-scale [contribution 8]. Liang et al. (2023) reviewed the literature on the pollution components of pulp and paper wastewater, their environmental and health impacts, and the sustainable treatment, recycling, and utilization of pulp and paper wastewater [contribution 9].

3. Conclusions and Future Directions

Toxic pollutants in water represent a complex and urgent challenge that demands immediate attention from scientists, policymakers, industry leaders, and civil society. Researchers have developed eco-friendly and cost-effective materials and methods for the efficient removal of pollutants from contaminated water, wastewater regeneration and reuse, and reducing toxicant levels, paving the way for scalable and adaptable wastewater treatment and sustainable water management [23,24,25]. Although progress has been made, much work remains to be completed to ensure that everyone has access to safe and clean water. As we face the growing pressures of climate change, population growth, and resource scarcity, protecting our water resources is not just an environmental imperative; it is also a moral one. The health of future generations depends on the choices that we make today. Let us act decisively, collaboratively, and with a shared commitment to preserving our most vital natural resources.
Effective regulation is essential to curb the release of toxic pollutants at source. Governments must enforce stringent industrial discharge standards, invest in wastewater treatment infrastructure, and promote sustainable agricultural practices. Transparency in reporting water-quality data and setting enforceable maximum contaminant levels are critical steps toward ensuring accountability. International cooperation is equally important in this regard. Water pollution knows no borders, especially in transboundary river basins and coastal waters. Agreements such as the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants [26] and the Paris Agreement [27] provide a framework for global action, but stronger enforcement and funding mechanisms are needed.
The future of water pollution control depends on our capacity to innovate, collaborate, and educate. By leveraging cutting-edge technologies (such as artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things), responding to challenges posed by climate change, modernizing governance frameworks, and increasing public awareness, we can build a robust and sustainable approach for protecting surface water and groundwater resources. As we progress, it is crucial to remain flexible and proactive in addressing new and evolving threats. Emphasizing integrated strategies that combine scientific research, community engagement, and informed policy decisions will be key to ensuring the long-term health and resilience of essential water systems and resources.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.A., S.Z., E.D.-B. and M.B.; investigation, S.A.; writing—original draft preparation, S.A.; writing—review and editing, S.Z. and M.B.; project administration, S.Z.; data curation, S.A. and E.D.-B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge all the editors, authors, and reviewers who contributed to this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Ikizoglu, B. PFOA and PFOS Pollution in Surface Waters and Surface Water Fish. Water 2024, 16, 2342.
  • Shaffique, S.; Kang, S.-M.; Ashraf, M.A.; Umar, A.; Khan, M.S.; Wajid, M.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Lee, I.-J. Research Progress on Migratory Water Birds: Indicators of Heavy Metal Pollution in Inland Wetland Resources of Punjab, Pakistan. Water 2024, 16, 1163.
  • Jing, W.; Sajnani, S.; Zhou, M.; Zhu, H.; Xu, Y. Evaluating the ecological impact of wastewater discharges on microbial and contaminant dynamics in rivers. Water 2024, 16, 377.
  • Piccardo, M.; Vellani, V.; Anselmi, S.; Bentivoglio, T.; Provenza, F.; Renzi, M.; Bevilacqua, S. The First Evidence of the Water Bioremediation Potential of Ficopomatus enigmaticus (Fauvel 1923): From Threat to Resource? Water 2024, 16, 368.
  • Medina Salas, J.P.; Gamarra Gómez, F.; Sacari Sacari, E.J.; Lanchipa Ramos, W.O.; Tamayo Calderón, R.M.; Mamani Flores, E.; Yapuchura Platero, V.; Florez Ponce de León, W.D.; Sandoval, E.M.L. ZnO-CuO nanocomposite as an efficient adsorbent for As (III) removal from water. Water 2023, 15, 4318.
  • Alhamzah, A.A.; Alofi, A.S.; Abid, A.A.; Fellows, C.M. Control of bromate formation in desalinated seawater production and transmission with ammoniation. Water 2023, 15, 3858.
  • Cáceda Quiroz, C.J.; Fora Quispe, G.d.L.; Carpio Mamani, M.; Maraza Choque, G.J.; Sacari Sacari, E.J. Cyanide bioremediation by Bacillus subtilis under alkaline conditions. Water 2023, 15, 3645.
  • Mahringer, D.; Zerelli, S.S.; Ruhl, A.S. Redox Behavior of Chromium in the Reduction, Coagulation, and Biotic Filtration (RCbF) Drinking Water Treatment—A Pilot Study. Water 2023, 15, 3363.
  • Liang, X.; Xu, Y.; Yin, L.; Wang, R.; Li, P.; Wang, J.; Liu, K. Sustainable utilization of pulp and paper wastewater. Water 2023, 15, 4135.

References

  1. Mishra, R.K. Fresh water availability and its global challenge. Br. J. Multidiscip. Adv. Stud. 2023, 4, 1–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fida, M.; Li, P.; Wang, Y.; Alam, S.K.; Nsabimana, A. Water contamination and human health risks in Pakistan: A review. Expo. Health 2023, 15, 619–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Singh, J.; Yadav, P.; Pal, A.K.; Mishra, V. Water pollutants: Origin and status. In Sensors in Water Pollutants Monitoring: Role of Material; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 5–20. [Google Scholar]
  4. Madhav, S.; Ahamad, A.; Singh, A.K.; Kushawaha, J.; Chauhan, J.S.; Sharma, S.; Singh, P. Water pollutants: Sources and impact on the environment and human health. In Sensors in Water Pollutants Monitoring: Role of Material; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 43–62. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fromme, H.; Küchler, T.; Otto, T.; Pilz, K.; Müller, J.; Wenzel, A. Occurrence of phthalates and bisphenol A and F in the environment. Water Res. 2002, 36, 1429–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ahmad, S.; Liu, L.; Zhang, S.; Tang, J. Nitrogen-doped biochar (N-doped BC) and iron/nitrogen co-doped biochar (Fe/N co-doped BC) for removal of refractory organic pollutants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 446, 130727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rathi, B.S.; Kumar, P.S.; Vo, D.-V.N. Critical review on hazardous pollutants in water environment: Occurrence, monitoring, fate, removal technologies and risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 797, 149134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Okoro, H.K.; Orosun, M.M.; Oriade, F.A.; Momoh-Salami, T.M.; Ogunkunle, C.O.; Adeniyi, A.G.; Zvinowanda, C.; Ngila, J.C. Potentially toxic elements in pharmaceutical industrial effluents: A review on risk assessment, treatment, and management for human health. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Z.; Luo, P.; Zha, X.; Xu, C.; Kang, S.; Zhou, M.; Nover, D.; Wang, Y. Overview assessment of risk evaluation and treatment technologies for heavy metal pollution of water and soil. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 379, 134043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Manyepa, P.; Gani, K.M.; Seyam, M.; Banoo, I.; Genthe, B.; Kumari, S.; Bux, F. Removal and risk assessment of emerging contaminants and heavy metals in a wastewater reuse process producing drinkable water for human consumption. Chemosphere 2024, 361, 142396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jafarzadeh, N.; Heidari, K.; Meshkinian, A.; Kamani, H.; Mohammadi, A.A.; Conti, G.O. Non-carcinogenic risk assessment of exposure to heavy metals in underground water resources in Saraven, Iran: Spatial distribution, monte-carlo simulation, sensitive analysis. Environ. Res. 2022, 204, 112002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, L.; Xu, X.; Zhu, D.; Li, X.; Zhang, G.; Cheng, G.; Liu, Q.; Lin, L.; Wang, D. The occurrence and ecological risk assessment of typical organic polutants in the effluents of urban reclaimed water plants. Acta Sci. Circumstantiae 2021, 41, 1910–1919. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ankley, G.T.; Cureton, P.; Hoke, R.A.; Houde, M.; Kumar, A.; Kurias, J.; Lanno, R.; McCarthy, C.; Newsted, J.; Salice, C.J. Assessing the ecological risks of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances: Current state-of-the science and a proposed path forward. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2021, 40, 564–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, B.-N.; Cho, S.-C.; Kim, Y.; Shin, M.-S.; Yoo, H.-J.; Kim, J.-W.; Yang, Y.H.; Kim, H.-W.; Bhang, S.-Y.; Hong, Y.-C. Phthalates exposure and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in school-age children. Biol. Psychiatry 2009, 66, 958–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ahmad, S.; Zhu, X.; Wang, Q.; Wei, X.; Zhang, S. Microwave-assisted hydrothermal treatment of soybean residue and chitosan: Characterization of hydrochars and role of N and P transformation for Pb (II) removal. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2021, 160, 105330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shan, D.; Deng, S.; Zhao, T.; Wang, B.; Wang, Y.; Huang, J.; Yu, G.; Winglee, J.; Wiesner, M.R. Preparation of ultrafine magnetic biochar and activated carbon for pharmaceutical adsorption and subsequent degradation by ball milling. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 305, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Plakas, K.V.; Karabelas, A.J. Removal of pesticides from water by NF and RO membranes—A review. Desalination 2012, 287, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pervez, M.; Balakrishnan, M.; Hasan, S.W.; Choo, K.-H.; Zhao, Y.; Cai, Y.; Zarra, T.; Belgiorno, V.; Naddeo, V. A critical review on nanomaterials membrane bioreactor (NMs-MBR) for wastewater treatment. NPJ Clean Water 2020, 3, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kumari, M.; Pulimi, M. Phthalate esters: Occurrence, toxicity, bioremediation, and advanced oxidation processes. Water Sci. Technol. 2023, 87, 2090–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Miklos, D.B.; Remy, C.; Jekel, M.; Linden, K.G.; Drewes, J.E.; Hübner, U. Evaluation of advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment–A critical review. Water Res. 2018, 139, 118–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pidgeon, N.; Porritt, J.; Ryan, J.; Seaton, A.; Tendler, S.; Welland, M.; Whatmore, R. Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties. R. Soc. R. Acad. Eng. 2004, 29, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bala, S.; Garg, D.; Thirumalesh, B.V.; Sharma, M.; Sridhar, K.; Inbaraj, B.S.; Tripathi, M. Recent strategies for bioremediation of emerging pollutants: A review for a green and sustainable environment. Toxics 2022, 10, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Roy, A.; Bhattacharya, J. Nanotechnology in Industrial Wastewater Treatment; IWA Publishing: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ahmad, S.; Liu, X.; Tang, J.; Zhang, S. Biochar-supported nanosized zero-valent iron (nZVI/BC) composites for removal of nitro and chlorinated contaminants. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 431, 133187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, S.; Jin, Y.; Chen, W.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Ren, H. Artificial intelligence in wastewater treatment: A data-driven analysis of status and trends. Chemosphere 2023, 336, 139163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pollutants, P.O. Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. In Proceedings of the Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee Twentieth Meeting, Rome, Italy, 23–27 September 2024. [Google Scholar]
  27. Agreement, P. Paris agreement. In Proceedings of the Report of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (21st Session, 2015: Paris), Paris, France, 30 November–13 December 2015; p. 2. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahmad, S.; Zhang, S.; Baqar, M.; Danso-Boateng, E. Toxic Pollutants in Water: Health Risk Assessment and Removal. Water 2025, 17, 1896. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131896

AMA Style

Ahmad S, Zhang S, Baqar M, Danso-Boateng E. Toxic Pollutants in Water: Health Risk Assessment and Removal. Water. 2025; 17(13):1896. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131896

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahmad, Shakeel, Shicheng Zhang, Mujtaba Baqar, and Eric Danso-Boateng. 2025. "Toxic Pollutants in Water: Health Risk Assessment and Removal" Water 17, no. 13: 1896. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131896

APA Style

Ahmad, S., Zhang, S., Baqar, M., & Danso-Boateng, E. (2025). Toxic Pollutants in Water: Health Risk Assessment and Removal. Water, 17(13), 1896. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131896

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop