Next Article in Journal
Freshwater Quality Challenges in Southern Europe Under an Increasingly Warmer and Drier Climate Scenario
Previous Article in Journal
Shower Biofilms and the Role of Plumbing Materials in Reverse Osmosis Water Networks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multivariate Statistical Modeling of Seasonal River Water Quality Using Limited Hydrological and Climatic Data
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Water Pollution Monitoring, Modeling, and Management

1
Business School, Hunan First Normal University, Changsha 410114, China
2
College of Ecology and Environment, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2025, 17(13), 1871; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131871
Submission received: 21 May 2025 / Accepted: 19 June 2025 / Published: 24 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Pollution Monitoring, Modelling and Management)

1. Introduction

Water pollution remains one of the most pressing environmental challenges of our time [1,2,3]. With rapid industrialization, urbanization, and agricultural expansion, water bodies around the globe face increasing threats from contaminants ranging from heavy metals to microplastics [4,5,6,7]. The degradation of water quality has far-reaching implications not only for ecosystems but also for human health, biodiversity, and the sustainability of water resources [8,9,10,11]. This editorial discusses the importance of water pollution monitoring, modeling, and management, highlighting recent advancements and outlining future directions for research and policy.

2. The Importance of Monitoring Water Pollution

Effective water pollution monitoring is the cornerstone of any management strategy [12]. It involves the systematic collection of data regarding the quality of water bodies, including rivers, lakes, and coastal areas [13,14]. The objectives of monitoring are multifaceted:
(1)
Assessing Water Quality: Regular monitoring allows for the assessment of physical, chemical, and biological parameters, providing a snapshot of the current state of water bodies [15,16].
(2)
Identifying Pollution Sources: By analyzing trends and patterns in water quality data, it becomes possible to identify point and non-point sources of pollution, such as industrial discharges, agricultural runoff, and wastewater effluents [17,18,19].
(3)
Regulatory Compliance: Monitoring is essential for ensuring compliance with local, national, and international water quality standards, thereby safeguarding public health and the environment [20,21].
(4)
Public Awareness and Policy Making: Data from monitoring programs can inform stakeholders and policymakers, fostering community awareness and encouraging the implementation of effective regulations [22,23].
Recent advancements in monitoring technologies, such as remote sensing, in situ sensors, and mobile applications, have enhanced our ability to collect and analyze water quality data in real time [24,25]. For instance, satellite imagery can detect algal blooms and sedimentation patterns across large areas, while portable sensors can measure pollutants on-site, enabling faster responses to contamination events [26,27].

3. Modeling Water Pollution

Modeling is an essential tool for understanding and predicting the dynamics of water pollution [28,29]. It allows scientists and policymakers to simulate various scenarios, facilitating informed decision-making [30]. The primary objectives of water pollution modeling include the following:
(1)
Predictive Analysis: Models can forecast the transport and fate of pollutants in aquatic systems, providing insights into how contaminants spread over time and space [31,32].
(2)
Scenario Testing: Through modeling, researchers can evaluate the potential impact of different management strategies, such as pollution control measures or restoration efforts, before implementation [33].
(3)
Risk Assessment: Models can help assess the ecological and human health risks associated with various levels of pollution, enabling better prioritization of management actions [34,35].
(4)
Integration with Climate Change Projections: As climate change alters precipitation patterns and water temperatures, integrating these factors into pollution models is crucial for understanding future risks [36,37].
Recent advancements in computational power and data availability have led to the development of sophisticated models, such as hydrodynamic and water quality models, that can simulate complex interactions between various environmental factors [38,39]. However, challenges remain, particularly in ensuring that models accurately reflect real-world conditions [40]. Collaboration between modelers, field scientists, and policymakers is vital for refining these tools and enhancing their applicability.

4. Management Strategies for Water Pollution

Effective management of water pollution requires a comprehensive approach that integrates monitoring, modeling, and policy frameworks. Several strategies can be employed:
(1)
Regulatory Frameworks: Establishing and enforcing strict regulations governing pollutant discharges is fundamental to managing water quality. This includes setting limits for industrial effluents, agricultural runoff, and wastewater treatment standards [41,42].
(2)
Best Management Practices (BMPs): Implementing BMPs in agriculture and urban planning can significantly reduce non-point source pollution. Practices such as contour farming, riparian buffer zones, and green infrastructure can mitigate runoff and improve water quality [43,44].
(3)
Public Engagement and Education: Raising public awareness about the importance of water conservation and pollution prevention can lead to more sustainable practices at the individual and community levels. Educational campaigns can empower citizens to advocate for better water management policies [45,46].
(4)
Technological Innovations: The adoption of innovative technologies, such as bioremediation, advanced filtration systems, and wastewater recycling, can enhance water treatment processes and reduce pollution [47,48]. Biomass undergoes thermochemical conversion under limited or anaerobic conditions, resulting in a carbon-rich solid substance called biochar [49]. Biochar or its derived modified materials can effectively remove water pollutants [50].
(5)
Collaborative Management: Water bodies often cross political boundaries, necessitating collaborative management approaches [51]. Engaging stakeholders from various sectors—government, industry, academia, and the community—ensures that diverse perspectives are considered in decision-making processes [52].

5. Challenges and Future Directions

Despite the advancements in monitoring, modeling, and management, several challenges persist, including the following:
(1)
Data Gaps and Standardization: In many regions, particularly in developing countries, data on water quality are sparse or inconsistent. Establishing standardized protocols for data collection and sharing is essential for effective monitoring and assessment [53,54].
(2)
Funding and Resource Limitations: Water pollution management often suffers from inadequate funding, limiting the scope and effectiveness of monitoring programs and technological implementation [55,56].
(3)
Climate Change Impacts: As climate change alters hydrological cycles, it introduces new challenges in water pollution management. Models and management strategies must evolve to account for these changing conditions [57,58].
(4)
Emerging Contaminants: The identification of new pollutants, such as pharmaceuticals and personal care products, necessitates ongoing research and adaptation of monitoring and management practices [59,60,61].
Moving forward, interdisciplinary research that bridges the gap between environmental science, engineering, and policy will be critical. Initiatives that promote collaboration among scientists, policymakers, and communities can foster innovative solutions and enhance the resilience of water resources.

6. Conclusions

Water pollution monitoring, modeling, and management are integral to ensuring the sustainability of our vital water resources. As we face escalating challenges related to water quality, it is imperative that we leverage technological advancements, engage communities, and foster collaborative governance. By adopting a proactive and integrated approach, we can protect water resources for current and future generations, ensuring that clean water remains accessible to all. The journey toward effective water pollution management is ongoing, and collective efforts will be essential in overcoming the obstacles that lie ahead.
This Special Issue focuses on water pollution monitoring, modeling, and management. In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are showcased.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, Y.L.; writing—review and editing, R.S.; project administration, R.S.; funding acquisition, R.S. and Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52000183), the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2023JJ31010, 2024JJ7094, 2025JJ70604), and the Key Project of Scientific Research Project of Hunan Provincial Department of Education (23A0225), the Hunan Province Environmental Protection Research Project (HBKYXM-2023038) and the Scientific Research Foundation for Talented Scholars of CSUFT (2020YJ010).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the participants who devoted their free time to participate in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Su, R.; Dai, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Chen, Y.; Luo, Y.; Ouyang, D. Metronidazole degradation by UV and UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation processes: Kinetics, mechanisms, and effects of natural water matrices. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 12354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kordbacheh, F.; Heidari, G. Water pollutants and approaches for their removal. Mater. Chem. Horiz. 2023, 2, 139–153. [Google Scholar]
  3. Su, R.; Chai, L.; Tang, C.; Li, B.; Yang, Z. Comparison of the degradation of molecular and ionic ibuprofen in a UV/H2O2 system. Water Sci. Technol. 2018, 77, 2174–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Barletta, M.; Lima, A.R.; Costa, M.F. Distribution, sources and consequences of nutrients, persistent organic pollutants, metals and microplastics in South American estuaries. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 651, 1199–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Su, R.; Li, Z.; Cheng, F.; Dai, X.; Wang, H.; Luo, Y.; Huang, L. Advances in the degradation of emerging contaminants by persulfate oxidation technology. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2023, 234, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Devendrapandi, G.; Balu, R.; Ayyappan, K.; Ayyamperumal, R.; Alhammadi, S.; Lavanya, M.; Senthilkumar, R.; Karthika, P. Unearthing Earth’s secrets: Exploring the environmental legacy of contaminants in soil, water, and sediments. Environ. Res. 2024, 249, 118246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Su, R.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Wang, H.; Dai, X.; Ge, X.; Luo, Y. Single atoms in environmental catalysis: Breakthroughs in synthesis and application. J. Water Process Eng. 2024, 68, 106319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sahoo, S.; Goswami, S. Theoretical framework for assessing the economic and environmental impact of water pollution: A detailed study on sustainable development of India. J. Future Sustain. 2024, 4, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, D.; Sial, M.S.; Ahmad, N.; Filipe, A.J.; Thu, P.A.; Zia-Ud-Din, M.; Caleiro, A.B. Water scarcity and sustainability in an emerging economy: A management perspective for future. Sustainability 2020, 13, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Luo, Y.; Liu, Z.; Ye, M.; Zhou, Y.; Su, R.; Huang, S.; Chen, Y.; Dai, X. Synergistic enhancement of oxytetracycline hydrochloride removal by UV/ZIF-67 (Co)-activated peroxymonosulfate. Water 2024, 16, 2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Luo, Y.; Su, R.; Yao, H.; Zhang, A.; Xiang, S.; Huang, L. Degradation of trimethoprim by sulfate radical-based advanced oxidation processes: Kinetics, mechanisms, and effects of natural water matrices. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 62572–62582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Staponites, L.R.; Simon, O.P.; Barták, V.; Bílý, M. Management effectiveness in a freshwater protected area: Long-term water quality response to catchment-scale land use changes. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 144, 109438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Murray, C.; Larson, A.; Goodwill, J.; Wang, Y.; Cardace, D.; Akanda, A.S. Water quality observations from space: A review of critical issues and challenges. Environments 2022, 9, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kumar, L.; Kumari, R.; Kumar, A.; Tunio, I.A.; Sassanelli, C. Water quality assessment and monitoring in Pakistan: A comprehensive review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Adjovu, G.E.; Stephen, H.; James, D.; Ahmad, S. Overview of the application of remote sensing in effective monitoring of water quality parameters. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. López-Ramírez, G.A.; Aragón-Zavala, A. Wireless sensor networks for water quality monitoring: A comprehensive review. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 95120–95142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, H.; Gao, Q.; Yuan, B. Analysis and identification of pollution sources of comprehensive river water quality: Evidence from two river basins in China. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 135, 108561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lencha, S.M.; Ulsido, M.D.; Muluneh, A. Evaluation of seasonal and spatial variations in water quality and identification of potential sources of pollution using multivariate statistical techniques for Lake Hawassa watershed, Ethiopia. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Luo, Y.; Su, R. Preparation of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) metal organic framework and its performance in adsorbing and removing tetracycline. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Van Winckel, T.; Cools, J.; Vlaeminck, S.E.; Joos, P.; Van Meenen, E.; Borregán-Ochando, E.; Van Den Steen, K.; Geerts, R.; Vandermoere, F.; Blust, R. Towards harmonization of water quality management: A comparison of chemical drinking water and surface water quality standards around the globe. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 298, 113447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wolfram, J.; Stehle, S.; Bub, S.; Petschick, L.L.; Schulz, R. Water quality and ecological risks in European surface waters–Monitoring improves while water quality decreases. Environ. Int. 2021, 152, 106479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bakhtiari, V.; Piadeh, F.; Chen, A.S.; Behzadian, K. Stakeholder analysis in the application of cutting-edge digital visualisation technologies for urban flood risk management: A critical review. Expert Syst. Appl. 2024, 236, 121426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Muhamad Khair, N.K.; Lee, K.E.; Mokhtar, M. Sustainable city and community empowerment through the implementation of community-based monitoring: A conceptual approach. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Silva, G.M.e.; Campos, D.F.; Brasil, J.A.T.; Tremblay, M.; Mendiondo, E.M.; Ghiglieno, F. Advances in technological research for online and in situ water quality monitoring—A review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yaroshenko, I.; Kirsanov, D.; Marjanovic, M.; Lieberzeit, P.A.; Korostynska, O.; Mason, A.; Frau, I.; Legin, A. Real-time water quality monitoring with chemical sensors. Sensors 2020, 20, 3432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chapman, J.; Truong, V.K.; Elbourne, A.; Gangadoo, S.; Cheeseman, S.; Rajapaksha, P.; Latham, K.; Crawford, R.J.; Cozzolino, D. Combining chemometrics and sensors: Toward new applications in monitoring and environmental analysis. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 6048–6069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, S.; Glamore, W.; Tamburic, B.; Morrow, A.; Johnson, F. Remote sensing to detect harmful algal blooms in inland waterbodies. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 851, 158096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, Y.; Song, L.; Liu, Y.; Yang, L.; Li, D. A review of the artificial neural network models for water quality prediction. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tung, T.M.; Yaseen, Z.M. A survey on river water quality modelling using artificial intelligence models: 2000–2020. J. Hydrol. 2020, 585, 124670. [Google Scholar]
  30. Süsser, D.; Ceglarz, A.; Gaschnig, H.; Stavrakas, V.; Flamos, A.; Giannakidis, G.; Lilliestam, J. Model-based policymaking or policy-based modelling? How energy models and energy policy interact. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 75, 101984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jampani, M.; Mateo-Sagasta, J.; Chandrasekar, A.; Fatta-Kassinos, D.; Graham, D.W.; Gothwal, R.; Moodley, A.; Chadag, V.M.; Wiberg, D.; Langan, S. Fate and transport modelling for evaluating antibiotic resistance in aquatic environments: Current knowledge and research priorities. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 461, 132527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tong, X.; Mohapatra, S.; Zhang, J.; Tran, N.H.; You, L.; He, Y.; Gin, K.Y.-H. Source, fate, transport and modelling of selected emerging contaminants in the aquatic environment: Current status and future perspectives. Water Res. 2022, 217, 118418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mousavi, S.H.; Kavianpour, M.; Alcaraz, J.L.G.; Yamini, O.A. System dynamics modeling for effective strategies in water pollution control: Insights and applications. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 9024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Berrone, P.; Rousseau, H.E.; Ricart, J.E.; Brito, E.; Giuliodori, A. How can research contribute to the implementation of sustainable development goals? An interpretive review of SDG literature in management. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2023, 25, 318–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chormare, R.; Kumar, M.A. Environmental health and risk assessment metrics with special mention to biotransfer, bioaccumulation and biomagnification of environmental pollutants. Chemosphere 2022, 302, 134836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, L.; Knapp, J.L.; Lintern, A.; Ng, G.-H.C.; Perdrial, J.; Sullivan, P.L.; Zhi, W. River water quality shaped by land–river connectivity in a changing climate. Nat. Clim. Change 2024, 14, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xiong, J.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, J.; Quan, F.; Lu, H.; Zeng, H. Impact of climate change on coastal water quality and its interaction with pollution prevention efforts. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 325, 116557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cho, K.H.; Pachepsky, Y.; Ligaray, M.; Kwon, Y.; Kim, K.H. Data assimilation in surface water quality modeling: A review. Water Res. 2020, 186, 116307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shan, C.; Guo, H.; Dong, Z.; Liu, L.; Lu, D.; Hu, J. Study on the river habitat quality in Luanhe based on the eco-hydrodynamic model. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 142, 109262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Su, R.; Yao, H.; Wang, H.; Chen, Y.; Huang, S.; Luo, Y.; Ma, X. Metal-organic frameworks for removing emerging organic pollutants: A review. J. Water Process Eng. 2025, 70, 107096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Giri, S. Water quality prospective in Twenty First Century: Status of water quality in major river basins, contemporary strategies and impediments: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 271, 116332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Gursoy-Haksevenler, B.H.; Atasoy-Aytis, E.; Dilaver, M.; Yalcinkaya, S.; Findik-Cinar, N.; Kucuk, E.; Pilevneli, T.; Koc-Orhon, A.; Siltu, E.; Gücver, S.M. A strategy for the implementation of water-quality-based discharge limits for the regulation of hazardous substances. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 24706–24720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Anteneh, Y.; Alamirew, T.; Zeleke, G.; Kassawmar, T. Modeling runoff-sediment influx responses to alternative BMP interventions in the Gojeb watershed, Ethiopia, using the SWAT hydrological model. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 22816–22834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tao, Z.; Liu, G. Research progress and treatment status of agricultural non-point source pollution in China. Acad. J. Agric. Life Sci. 2024, 5, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  45. Dushkova, D.; Ivlieva, O. Empowering Communities to Act for a Change: A Review of the Community Empowerment Programs towards Sustainability and Resilience. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Priatna, D.; Khan, S.M. The importance of education and role of educational institutions in climate change mitigation and achieving UN SDG 13 “Climate Action”. Indones. J. Appl. Environ. Stud. 2024, 5, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Saeed, M.U.; Hussain, N.; Sumrin, A.; Shahbaz, A.; Noor, S.; Bilal, M.; Aleya, L.; Iqbal, H.M. Microbial bioremediation strategies with wastewater treatment potentialities—A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 818, 151754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Saravanan, A.; Kumar, P.S.; Jeevanantham, S.; Karishma, S.; Tajsabreen, B.; Yaashikaa, P.; Reshma, B. Effective water/wastewater treatment methodologies for toxic pollutants removal: Processes and applications towards sustainable development. Chemosphere 2021, 280, 130595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yang, Y.; Li, S.; Zhu, Z.; Wan, L.; Wang, X.; Hou, J.; Liu, S.; Fan, X. Preparation of chitosan-iron oxide modified sludge-based biochar for effective removal of tetracycline from water: Performance and mechanism. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 622–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, X.; Qian, S.; Ma, Y.; Zhu, J.; Shen, S.; Tang, J.; Ding, Y.; Zhi, S.; Zhang, K.; Yang, L. Efficient degradation of sulfamethoxazole in various waters with peroxymonosulfate activated by magnetic-modified sludge biochar: Surface-bound radical mechanism. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 319, 121010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sattler, C.; Schröter, B. Collective action across boundaries: Collaborative network initiatives as boundary organizations to improve ecosystem services governance. Ecosyst. Serv. 2022, 56, 101452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Santos, E.; Carvalho, M.; Martins, S. Sustainable water management: Understanding the socioeconomic and cultural dimensions. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liguori, K.; Keenum, I.; Davis, B.C.; Calarco, J.; Milligan, E.; Harwood, V.J.; Pruden, A. Antimicrobial resistance monitoring of water environments: A framework for standardized methods and quality control. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 9149–9160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mukonza, S.S.; Chiang, J.-L. Meta-Analysis of Satellite Observations for United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: Exploring the Potential of Machine Learning for Water Quality Monitoring. Environments 2023, 10, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gupta, A.D.; Pandey, P.; Feijóo, A.; Yaseen, Z.M.; Bokde, N.D. Smart water technology for efficient water resource management: A review. Energies 2020, 13, 6268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shi, J.; Huang, W.; Han, H.; Xu, C. Pollution control of wastewater from the coal chemical industry in China: Environmental management policy and technical standards. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 143, 110883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Qiu, J.; Shen, Z.; Xie, H. Drought impacts on hydrology and water quality under climate change. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 858, 159854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yang, D.; Yang, Y.; Xia, J. Hydrological cycle and water resources in a changing world: A review. Geogr. Sustain. 2021, 2, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Su, R.; Xie, C.; Alhassan, S.I.; Huang, S.; Chen, R.; Xiang, S.; Wang, Z.; Huang, L. Oxygen reduction reaction in the field of water environment for application of nanomaterials. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kumar, M.; Sridharan, S.; Sawarkar, A.D.; Shakeel, A.; Anerao, P.; Mannina, G.; Sharma, P.; Pandey, A. Current research trends on emerging contaminants pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs): A comprehensive review. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 859, 160031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Narayanan, M.; El-Sheekh, M.; Ma, Y.; Pugazhendhi, A.; Natarajan, D.; Kandasamy, G.; Raja, R.; Kumar, R.S.; Kumarasamy, S.; Sathiyan, G. Current status of microbes involved in the degradation of pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) pollutants in the aquatic ecosystem. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 300, 118922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luo, Y.; Su, R. Water Pollution Monitoring, Modeling, and Management. Water 2025, 17, 1871. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131871

AMA Style

Luo Y, Su R. Water Pollution Monitoring, Modeling, and Management. Water. 2025; 17(13):1871. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131871

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luo, Yiting, and Rongkui Su. 2025. "Water Pollution Monitoring, Modeling, and Management" Water 17, no. 13: 1871. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131871

APA Style

Luo, Y., & Su, R. (2025). Water Pollution Monitoring, Modeling, and Management. Water, 17(13), 1871. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131871

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop