Next Article in Journal
Taxonomic and Functional Responses of Macroinvertebrates to Hydrological Changes and Invasive Plants in an NW Patagonia Riparian Corridor (Argentina)
Previous Article in Journal
A Social–Technical–Ecological Systems Analysis of Sustainable Development Paths for Marine Ranching in Guangdong Province, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Decreased Incidence of Raphidiopsis raciborskii Bloom in a Temperate Floodplain Lake in the Middle Danube Affected by Extreme Hydrological Events
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Growth Response of Submerged Macrophyte Vallisneria denseserrulata to Water Depth (Light Intensity) Changes Varies with Sediment Nutrient Level

1
Department of Ecology, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Lake and Watershed Science for Water Security, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
3
Guangzhou Beishan Aquatic Eco-Science and Technology Ltd., Guangzhou 510660, China
4
Sino-Danish College, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
5
Department of Ecoscience and WATEC, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
6
Institute for Ecological Research and Pollution Control of Plateau Lakes, School of Ecology and Environmental Science, Yunnan University, Kunming 650106, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2025, 17(13), 1839; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131839
Submission received: 29 April 2025 / Revised: 10 June 2025 / Accepted: 17 June 2025 / Published: 20 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Protection and Restoration of Freshwater Ecosystems)

Abstract

The re-establishment of submerged macrophytes is crucial for the ecological restoration of eutrophic lakes. Water depth (light intensity) and sediment nutrient levels are key factors influencing the growth of these macrophytes. Although their individual impacts have been extensively studied, their interactive effects remain unclear. We conducted a two-factor experiment to investigate the interactive effects of different water depths (50 cm and 190 cm) and sediment nutrient levels (fertile and infertile) on the growth and morphological traits of Vallisneria denseserrulata. We found that biomass, relative growth rate, below/above-ground biomass, ramet number, and leaf number significantly increased with decreasing water depth in fertile sediments, while no significant or less pronounced changes occurred for infertile sediments. The absence or weak responses to increased light intensity in infertile sediments are likely due to photoinhibition, which may be alleviated at higher nutrient levels in fertile sediments. Additionally, V. denseserrulata, in adapting to low-light environments (deeper water), increased plant height at the cost of decreased leaf number and below-ground biomass as water depth increased in fertile sediments. Our study demonstrated significant interactive effects between water depth (light intensity) and sediment nutrient levels on the growth and morphological traits of V. denseserrulata, indicating that their response to water depth (light intensity) strongly depends on sediment fertility.

1. Introduction

Submerged macrophytes play a critical role in maintaining the functions of lake ecosystems [1,2,3]. Their growth and distribution are influenced by a range of environmental factors, including nutrients, light intensity, temperature, and substrate characteristics [4,5].
Water depth primarily influences the growth of submerged macrophytes by altering the intensity of available underwater light [6,7]. Light intensity decreases with increasing water depth. Submerged macrophyte distribution along a depth gradient is primarily determined by light availability [8]. Submerged macrophytes exhibit high phenotypic plasticity, allowing them to adapt to reduced light intensity as water depth increases. This adaptation includes increased biomass allocation to above-ground growth, increased plant height, and reduced branch or leaf numbers [9,10]. Conversely, high light intensity can induce photoinhibition in these plants and thus reduce their growth rate [11].
Nutrients in both water and sediment can affect the growth and morphology of submerged macrophytes [12,13]. Some species, such as Vallisneria spp., take up more nutrients from sediment than from water [14,15]. Many submerged macrophytes adapt to changes in nutrient availability. For instance, in an experiment with Myriophyllum spicatum, Xie et al. (2013) found that plants grown at high nutrient levels produced longer shoots and shoot internodes than plants grown at low nutrient levels [16].
In shallow lakes, submerged macrophytes are often the dominant primary producer, but their biomass and coverage decline with eutrophication. Submerged macrophyte loss is mainly attributed to reduced light condition, resulting from phytoplankton shading [17]. The restoration of shallow lake ecosystems aims to increase light intensity above the sediment to meet the minimum light requirement for submerged macrophyte growth [18]. To achieve this, improvements in water clarity or reductions in water levels are often applied in practice [19,20]. The removal of nutrient-enriched surface sediments is a commonly used method to lower internal loading and enhance lake ecosystem recovery [21].
Although the effect of water depth (light intensity) [22,23,24] and sediment nutrients [25,26,27] on submerged macrophyte growth is well studied, the interactive effects of these two factors are not clear. In this study, a two-factor experiment was designed to study the interactive effects of sediment nutrient level and water depth (light intensity) on the growth and morphological traits of V. denseserrulata, a common submerged macrophyte in lakes in China. We hypothesized that water depth would significantly affect the growth and morphological traits of V. denseserrulata, with these effects depending on the sediment nutrient levels. The results have implications for the restoration of eutrophic lakes, as submerged macrophytes play key roles in determining the success of lake restoration [1,19,28].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design

The experiment was initiated on 7 September 2022 in a restored area of Lake Yi’Ai, a subtropical lake located in Huangzhou District, Huanggang, Hubei Province, China [20], lasting 40 days. During the experiment, the mean concentrations of total nitrogen and total phosphorus were 1.69 (±0.02) and 0.027 (±0.004) mg/L, and the mean temperature and Secchi depth were 24.9 (±4) °C and 1.77 (±0.24) m, respectively. The following four treatments were applied: two water depths (50 and 190 cm) and two sediment nutrient levels (fertile and infertile, Table 1), taken from different areas of the lake. Each treatment was replicated three times. Plastic pots with a bottom diameter of 20 cm and a height of 16 cm were used for planting the macrophytes and were suspended by nylon ropes from a floating bed on the lake surface at depths of 50 and 190 cm. Five V. denseserrulata seedlings with similar sizes and a total fresh weight of 2.0 ± 0.5 g were planted in each pot.

2.2. Plant Growth and Traits

At the end of the experiment, all plants were collected, rinsed with lake water, and brought to the laboratory. The fresh weight, plant height, and relative growth rate of the V. denseserrulata were measured and calculated. Plant biomass was calculated by fresh weight per plot area. The relative growth rate (RGR) of submerged plants is calculated as follows:
RGR mg · g 1 · d 1 = 1000 ln W f W i / D
where Wi and Wf are fresh weight at the beginning and end of the experiment, respectively, and D is the number of experimental days [29].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

We used two-way ANOVA to explore the independent and interactive effects of water depth and sediment type on the plant growth and traits (biomass, relative growth rate (RGR), ramet number, below-ground to above-ground biomass ratio, leaf number and plant height). Data that did not satisfy normality and homoscedasticity were log-transformed and then analyzed. The difference was significant when p < 0.05. All analyses were conducted in SPSS (version 26.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

The results of the two-way ANOVA indicated a strong interaction effect between water depth and sediment nutrient level on the biomass, relative growth rate (RGR), ramet number, below-ground to above-ground biomass ratio, leaf number, and plant height of V. denseserrulata (Table 2).
Plants grown in shallow water (50 cm) exhibited a significantly greater biomass, relative growth rate, leaf number, and below/above-ground biomass ratio compared to those grown in deep water and in fertile sediment, whereas no significant changes were observed in these metrics between the two water depths in infertile sediment (Figure 1).
In both fertile and infertile sediments, ramet number was significantly higher at 50 cm water depth than at 190 cm, while the magnitude of the difference between the two water depths was significantly larger in fertile sediments than in infertile sediments (Figure 1; Table 2).
Plant height showed a significant increase with water depths in both types of sediment, while the magnitude of increase was larger in the fertile sediments (Figure 1; Table 2).

4. Discussion

Our experiment showed a strong interaction effect between water depth and sediment fertility on the growth traits of the submerged macrophyte Vallisneria denseserrulata, indicating that the response of the plants to water depth (light intensity) is dependent on sediment nutrient availability.
Water depth is the main determinant of light intensity, affecting submerged macrophyte growth. Studies have generally shown a higher growth and reproduction of submerged macrophytes at increased light intensity resulting from decreasing water depth [30,31,32,33]. Our study revealed that, with decreasing depth, reproduction (ramet number), biomass, and relative growth rate increased in fertile sediments, likely due to increased light. The below/above-ground biomass ratio decreased with increasing water depth in fertile sediments, indicating a biomass allocation favoring leaf growth rather than root growth. We also found that leaf length increased with increasing water depth, while leaf numbers decreased. Strand & Weisner (2001) showed that plant height and branch length increased, but branch number decreased in the submerged macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum with increasing water depth [9]. Other studies on Vallisneria have shown similar results, i.e., increasing leaf length [10] along with decreasing leaf number [34] and root/shoot ratio [35] with increasing water depth. Switching biomass allocation to produce taller plants at the expense of decreased investment in branch number and below-ground biomass is considered a relevant strategy for maximizing photosynthesis and survival under poor light conditions [9,31]. Biomass and relative growth rate did not change with depth in the infertile sediment group, whereas ramet number increased significantly, though to a lesser extent compared to the increase observed in the fertile sediment group. Leaf number and below/above-ground biomass ratio showed no significant differences in infertile sediments across water depths. The weak responses of V. denseserrulata to decreased water depth may be due to photoinhibition in shallow waters. Yang et al. (2022) experimentally showed that the biomass and relative growth rate of V. natans decreased across water depths from 127 to 60 cm [35], and other studies have reported similar findings [32,36,37,38].
Why did V. denseserrulata grown in fertile sediments not show growth inhibition in shallow waters? The roots of Vallisneria spp. are well developed, and sediment nutrients serve as the main nutrient resource for their growth [39]. High nutrient availability in the fertile sediment likely alleviated the inhibition in our experiment. High light intensity may increase ROS (reactive oxygen species) production, inducing photoinhibition and thus negatively affect plant growth [40,41]. However, sufficient nutrient supply can alleviate plant photoinhibition via the biosynthesis of antioxidant enzymes and the detoxification of ROS [42], likely contributing to the positive responses of biomass and reproduction to improved light conditions (decreasing water depth) in the fertile sediment group.
We found that the below/above-ground biomass ratio decreased with water depth in fertile sediment, indicating a biomass allocation favoring leaf growth over root growth, as an adaptation to reduced light conditions. This adaptation was also evidenced by the increase in leaf length with water depth (reduced light intensity), enhancing light harvesting to maximize the photosynthesis rate. Similar results have been reported in V. natans [32,35]. Strand & Weisner (2001) found increased plant height and branch length and decreased branch number in the submerged macrophyte M. spicatum with increasing water depth [9].
For the restoration of shallow eutrophic lakes, re-establishing submerged macrophytes is critical to achieving a clear-water state [28]. Improving light conditions is essential for submerged macrophyte recovery. Practical measures include lowering water level and increasing water clarity by the flocculation of suspended solids [19,43]. However, our study indicates that submerged macrophytes growth may be inhibited in clear shallow water when the sediment nutrient content is low. Thus, to restore submerged macrophytes in shallow areas (e.g., water depth < 50 cm), both sediment nutrient content and light condition should be considered, as they influence the speed and success of recovery. These factors should be thoroughly assessed in restoration plans.

5. Conclusions

There was a significant interactive effect between water depth (light intensity) and sediment nutrient level on the growth and morphological traits of submerged macrophyte Vallisneria denseserrulata. The response of the plants to water depth (light intensity) was significantly affected by the sediment nutrient level, which should be analyzed in planning and assessing the success of submerged macrophyte restoration.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.L. and X.Z.; methodology, Z.L. and H.Z.; software, Y.L., J.Y. (Jinyang Yu) and H.Z. validation, H.H.; formal analysis, H.Z. and Y.L.; investigation, H.Z., Y.L. and S.F.; data curation, Y.L., J.Y. (Jinyang Yu) and H.Z.; writing—review and editing, Z.L., H.Z., Y.L., J.Y. (Jinyang Yu) and E.J.; visualization, Z.L.; supervision, Z.L. and J.Y. (Jinlei Yu); project administration, X.Y., Y.T. and P.Z.; funding acquisition, X.H. and X.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC3202100), Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation (20232ACB215006; 20242BAB23063) and Science and Technology Innovation Project of Changjiang Nanjing Waterway Engineering Bureau (NCWEB-KJ026).

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available upon request.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Yunlong Li and Tao Chen for their assistance in the field. We also thank Anne Mette Poulsen for her valuable suggestions and for improving the English in this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Xiaoqin Yang and Xiaolin He were employed by the company Guangzhou Beishan Aquatic Eco-Science and Technology Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jeppesen, E.; Søndergaard, M.; Søndergaard, M.; Christoffersen, K. The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes; Ecological Studies; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1998; Volume 131, ISBN 978-1-4612-6871-0. [Google Scholar]
  2. Su, H.; Wu, Y.; Xia, W.; Yang, L.; Chen, J.; Han, W.; Fang, J.; Xie, P. Stoichiometric mechanisms of regime shifts in freshwater ecosystem. Water Res. 2019, 149, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, Y.; Jeppesen, E.; Liu, X.; Qin, B.; Shi, K.; Zhou, Y.; Thomaz, S.M.; Deng, J. Global loss of aquatic vegetation in lakes. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2017, 173, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Barko, J.W.; Gunnison, D.; Carpenter, S.R. Sediment interactions with submersed macrophyte growth and community dynamics. Aquat. Bot. 1991, 41, 41–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dar, N.A.; Pandit, A.K.; Ganai, B.A. Factors affecting the distribution patterns of aquatic macrophytes. Limnol. Rev. 2014, 14, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, L.; Hu, X.Q.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, X.H.; Wang, G. Physiological and ecological adaptation strategies of Vallisneria natans to different water depths and sediments. Chin. J. Ecol. 2021, 40, 2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhou, N.; Hu, W.; Deng, J.; Zhu, J.; Xu, W.; Liu, X. The effects of water depth on the growth and reproduction of experiment. J. Plant Ecol. 2017, 10, 546–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Middelboe, A.; Markager, S. Depth limits and minimum light requirements of freshwater macrophytes. Freshw. Biol. 1997, 37, 553–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Strand, J.A.; Weisner, S.E.B. Morphological plastic responses to water depth and wave exposure in an aquatic plant (Myriophyllum spicatum). J. Ecol. 2001, 89, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chou, Q.; Zhang, W.; Chen, J.; Ren, W.; Yuan, C.; Wen, Z.; Zhang, X.; Cao, T.; Ni, L.; Jeppesen, E. Phenotypic responses of a submerged macrophyte (Vallisneria natans) to low light combined with water depth. Aquat. Bot. 2022, 176, 103462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Peralta, G.; Pérez-Lloréns, J.L.; Hernández, I.; Vergara, J.J. Effects of light availability on growth, architecture and nutrient content of the seagrass Zostera noltii Hornem. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2002, 269, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wen, M.; Li, K.; Wang, C. Effects of nutrient level on growth of Vallisneria natans in water. Res. Environ. Sci. 2008, 21, 74–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, S.; Jiang, L.; Ma, S.; Wu, Y.; Ye, Q.; Chang, Y.; Ye, Y.; Chen, K. Response of a submerged macrophyte (Vallisneria natans) to water depth gradients and sediment nutrient concentrations. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 912, 169154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Carignan, R.; Kalff, J. Phosphorus sources for aquatic weeds: Water or sediments? Science 1980, 207, 987–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ge, X.G.; Wang, G.X.; Chen, C.Z.; Wang, L.Z. Effects on the transformation of phosphorus in sediment with growing of Vallisneria natans. Shengtai Xuebao/Acta Ecol. Sin. 2014, 34, 5802–5811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xie, D.; Yu, D.; You, W.; Wang, L. Morphological and Physiological Responses to Sediment Nutrients in the Submerged Macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum. Wetlands 2013, 33, 1095–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Søndergaard, M.; Johansson, L.S.; Lauridsen, T.L.; Jørgensen, T.B.; Liboriussen, L.; Jeppesen, E. Submerged macrophytes as indicators of the ecological quality of lakes. Freshw. Biol. 2010, 55, 893–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Teubner, K.; Teubner, I.; Pall, K.; Tolotti, M.; Kabas, W.; Drexler, S.S.; Waidbacher, H.; Dokulil, M. Macrophyte habitat architecture and benthic-pelagic coupling: Photic habitat demand to build up large P storage capacity and bio-surface by underwater vegetation. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 901924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, Z.; Hu, J.; Zhong, P.; Zhang, X.; Ning, J.; Larsen, S.E.; Chen, D.; Gao, Y.; He, H.; Jeppesen, E. Successful restoration of a tropical shallow eutrophic lake: Strong bottom-up but weak top-down effects recorded. Water Res. 2018, 146, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, B.; Chen, D.; Lu, J.; Liu, S.; Wu, J.; Gan, L.; Yang, X.; He, X.; He, H.; Yu, J.; et al. Restoring turbid eutrophic shallow lakes to a clear-water state by combined biomanipulation and chemical treatment: A 4-hectare in-situ experiment in subtropical China. J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 380, 125061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cooke, G.D.; Welch, E.B.; Peterson, S.; Nichols, S.A. Restoration and Management of Lakes and Reservoirs, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cao, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, Z. Growth response of the submerged macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum to sediment nutrient levels and water-level fluctuations. Aquat. Biol. 2012, 17, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Diao, R.X.; Xu, Z.A.; Wu, D.H. In situ enclosure study on growth of Vallisneria natans at different water depths in Taihu Lake. Hydroecology 2017, 38, 43–47. [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, Q.; Huang, Q.; Li, Y.; Han, Y.; Jin, H.; He, H.; Li, K. Effects of water depth on growth of submerged macrophytes Vallisneria natans and Myriophyllum spicatum. J. Lake Sci. 2019, 31, 1045–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xie, Y.; Li, C.; Liu, Z.; Chen, G.; Lei, Z. Effects of sediments on the growth and morphology of Vallisneria natans. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2007, 26, 1269–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kang, Y.; Song, X.; Liu, Z. Sediment resuspension dampens the effect of nutrient inputs on the phytoplankton community: A mesocosm experiment study. Hydrobiologia 2013, 710, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gu, J.; Ning, X.; Jin, H.; Zhu, X.; Tan, B.; Li, K. Research progress in the effect of sediment resuspension on the photosynthesis and growth of submerged macrophytes. Ecol. Sci. 2016, 35, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hilt, S.; Alirangues Nuñez, M.M.; Bakker, E.S.; Blindow, I.; Davidson, T.A.; Gillefalk, M.; Hansson, L.A.; Janse, J.H.; Janssen, A.B.G.; Jeppesen, E.; et al. Response of submerged macrophyte communities to external and internal restoration measures in north temperate shallow lakes. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hoffmann, W.A.; Poorter, H. Avoiding bias in calculations of relative growth rate. Ann. Bot. 2002, 90, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Goldsborough, W.J.; Kemp, W.M. Light responses of a submersed macrophyte: Implications for survival in turbid tidal waters. Ecology 1988, 69, 1775–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Verhofstad, M.J.J.M.; Alirangues Núñez, M.M.; Reichman, E.P.; van Donk, E.; Lamers, L.P.M.; Bakker, E.S. Mass development of monospecific submerged macrophyte vegetation after the restoration of shallow lakes: Roles of light, sediment nutrient levels, and propagule density. Aquat. Bot. 2017, 141, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, Q.; Han, Y.; Chen, K.; Huang, X.; Li, K.; He, H. Effects of water depth on the growth of the submerged macrophytes Vallisneria natans and Hydrilla verticillata: Implications for water level management. Water 2021, 13, 2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gao, J.; Hu, W.; Wang, J.; Cui, Y.; Li, L. Response of Growth-Related Traits of Submerged Macrophytes to Light Reduction: A Meta-Analysis. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, L.; Bonser, S.P.; Lan, Z.; Xu, L.; Chen, J.; Song, Z. Water depth affects reproductive allocation and reproductive allometry in the submerged macrophyte Vallisneria natans. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yang, C.; Shi, X.; Nan, J.; Huang, Q.; Shen, X.; Li, J. Morphological responses of the submerged macrophyte Vallisneria natans along an underwater light gradient: A mesocosm experiment reveals the importance of the Secchi depth to water depth ratio. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 808, 152199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Xiao, K.; Yu, D.; Wu, Z. Differential effects of water depth and sediment type on clonal growth of the submersed macrophyte Vallisneria natans. Hydrobiologia 2007, 589, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lu, J.; Wang, Z.; Xing, W.; Liu, G. Effects of substrate and shading on the growth of two submerged macrophytes. Hydrobiologia 2013, 700, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jin, S.; Ibrahim, M.; Muhammad, S.; Khan, S.; Li, G. Light intensity effects on the growth and biomass production of submerged macrophytes in different water strata. Arab. J. Geosci. 2020, 13, 948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xie, Y.; An, S.; Wu, B. Resource allocation in the submerged plant Vallisneria natans related to sediment type, rather than water-column nutrients. Freshw. Biol. 2005, 50, 391–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Szymańska, R.; Ślesak, I.; Orzechowska, A.; Kruk, J. Physiological and biochemical responses to high light and temperature stress in plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2017, 139, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Roeber, V.M.; Bajaj, I.; Rohde, M.; Schmülling, T.; Cortleven, A. Light acts as a stressor and influences abiotic and biotic stress responses in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 645–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kumari, V.V.; Banerjee, P.; Verma, V.C.; Sukumaran, S.; Chandran, M.A.S.; Gopinath, K.A.; Venkatesh, G.; Yadav, S.K.; Singh, V.K.; Awasthi, N.K. Plant Nutrition: An effective way to alleviate abiotic stress in agricultural crops. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lürling, M.; Oosterhout, F.V. Controlling eutrophication by combined bloom precipitation and sediment phosphorus inactivation. Water Res. 2013, 47, 6527–6537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Biomass (a), relative growth rate (b), ramet number (c), below/above-ground biomass ratio (d), leaf numbert (e), and plant height (f) of Vallisneria denseserrulata in different treatment groups. Boxes denoted by different lowercase letters differ significantly through one way ANOVA (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Biomass (a), relative growth rate (b), ramet number (c), below/above-ground biomass ratio (d), leaf numbert (e), and plant height (f) of Vallisneria denseserrulata in different treatment groups. Boxes denoted by different lowercase letters differ significantly through one way ANOVA (p < 0.05).
Water 17 01839 g001
Table 1. Total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and organic matter (OM) contents in two different sediment types.
Table 1. Total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and organic matter (OM) contents in two different sediment types.
Sediment TypeTN/g·kg−1TP/g·kg−1OM/%
Fertile sediment1.520.776.7%
Infertile sediment0.270.123.4%
Table 2. Two-way ANOVA results on effects of sediment and water depth on biomass, relative growth rate, ramet number, below/above-ground biomass ratio, plant height, and leaf number of Vallisneria denseserrulata. p values below significance level (0.05) are in bold.
Table 2. Two-way ANOVA results on effects of sediment and water depth on biomass, relative growth rate, ramet number, below/above-ground biomass ratio, plant height, and leaf number of Vallisneria denseserrulata. p values below significance level (0.05) are in bold.
Factor SedimentWater DepthSediment × Water Depth
BiomassF48.30.713.2
p<0.0010.40.007
Relative growth rateF45.52.713.3
p<0.0010.10.007
Below/aboveground biomass ratioF2.525.220.8
p0.20.0010.002
Ramet numberF103.615529.1
p<0.001<0.0010.001
Plant heightF6.5104.99.9
p0.03<0.0010.014
Leaf numberF87.230.716.9
p<0.0010.0010.003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, Y.; Yu, J.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, X.; Tang, Y.; Zhong, P.; Fu, S.; He, X.; Yang, X.; He, H.; et al. Growth Response of Submerged Macrophyte Vallisneria denseserrulata to Water Depth (Light Intensity) Changes Varies with Sediment Nutrient Level. Water 2025, 17, 1839. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131839

AMA Style

Lin Y, Yu J, Zheng H, Zhang X, Tang Y, Zhong P, Fu S, He X, Yang X, He H, et al. Growth Response of Submerged Macrophyte Vallisneria denseserrulata to Water Depth (Light Intensity) Changes Varies with Sediment Nutrient Level. Water. 2025; 17(13):1839. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131839

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Yudan, Jinyang Yu, Honglong Zheng, Xiufeng Zhang, Yali Tang, Ping Zhong, Shi Fu, Xiaolin He, Xiaoqin Yang, Hu He, and et al. 2025. "Growth Response of Submerged Macrophyte Vallisneria denseserrulata to Water Depth (Light Intensity) Changes Varies with Sediment Nutrient Level" Water 17, no. 13: 1839. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131839

APA Style

Lin, Y., Yu, J., Zheng, H., Zhang, X., Tang, Y., Zhong, P., Fu, S., He, X., Yang, X., He, H., Yu, J., Jeppesen, E., & Liu, Z. (2025). Growth Response of Submerged Macrophyte Vallisneria denseserrulata to Water Depth (Light Intensity) Changes Varies with Sediment Nutrient Level. Water, 17(13), 1839. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131839

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop