Next Article in Journal
Comparative Study on Consumers’ Behavior Regarding Water Consumption Pattern
Previous Article in Journal
A Django-Based Modeling Platform for Predicting Soil Moisture in Agricultural Fields
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Ice on River Morphology and Hydraulic Structures: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Natural Ice/Snow and Humans: From Mountain to Sea

1
College of Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
3
School of Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
4
Australian Maritime College, University of Tasmania, Newnham, TAS 7248, Australia
5
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
6
Department of Technology and Safety, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9019 Tromsø, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2025, 17(12), 1754; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17121754
Submission received: 27 May 2025 / Accepted: 6 June 2025 / Published: 11 June 2025

1. Introduction

The cryosphere constitutes a vital component of the Earth’s system. With the sustained advancement and development of each research direction in the field of cryosphere, Cryospheric Science has emerged [1]. The cryosphere covers snow, glaciers, river ice, lake ice, sea ice, permafrost, etc. These cryospheric elements are also present in the terrestrial spheres, resulting in the strong association of the cryosphere with these terrestrial spheres (the atmosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere, biosphere) and the anthroposphere, as illustrated in Figure 1. Therefore, there are macroscale geographical, scientific studies, and microscale applied basic scientific studies. Because it is relevant to both socioeconomic and ecological disciplines, Cryospheric Science has a tripartite research classification: basic research, applied basic research, and applied research; see Figure 2 [1].
On the geographical scale, glaciers, lakes/rivers, and oceans have distinct socio-ecological functions and systems [2]. Notably, glaciers are situated in areas with limited anthropogenic disturbance. When they are conceptualized as an abiotic environmental driver, glaciers modulate downstream moraine ecosystems, river ecosystems, lake ecosystems, and estuary ecosystems [3]. At present, from alpine glaciers to sea ice, these cryospheric components vary with global climate change. The fundamental consequences of cryospheric components are as follows: (1) Glaciers, functioning as solid water towers, are critically linked to human livelihoods. Glacial meltwater accounts for approximately a third of global river runoff, serving as a vital water source for arid regions. However, they are retreating at accelerated rates [4]. (2) Phenological studies document a reduction in the ice-cover period in northern temperate lakes. (3) Phenological indicators of river ice in the Northern Hemisphere exhibit later freeze-up and earlier break-up dates, cover a smaller ice-covered area and have thinner ice thickness. (4) The spatial coverage and thickness of sea ice are decreasing, especially in the Arctic Ocean. Thinner winter ice accelerates summer ice melting, creating a self-reinforcing cycle. Ice-free ocean areas absorb greater solar radiation, delaying the autumn sea ice freeze-up date. Concurrently, diminished sea ice concentration around Antarctica enhances heat transfer from the ocean to the atmosphere, intensifying storm frequency. As sea ice melts, increased surface evaporation elevates atmospheric moisture, promoting low cloud formation. These low clouds absorb long-wave radiation from the ocean surface while retaining their heat function, prolonging the melting time of the sea ice while accelerating further ice loss.
On the applied basic science scale, cryospheric changes significantly impact human production and livelihoods through the following mechanisms. (1) While increased glacial meltwater may temporarily support agricultural irrigation and hydropower development, it poses latent risks to water scarcity in the long term. Meanwhile, increased glacier meltwater also elevates the probability of glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs), threatening downstream infrastructure and human safety [5]. (2) A complex coupled relationship exists between melting glaciers, imbalanced water resources, surface vegetation, desertification, and dust storms. In principle, this relationship is as follows: glacial retreat → reduced river/lake discharge → vegetation degradation → surface exposure → intensified dust storms [6]. Particularly, soil erosion and desertification driven by overgrazing have become the focus of recent studies [7,8]. Notably, dust and black carbon on snow and ice surfaces accelerate ice melt via albedo reduction [9]. (3) A reduced ice-cover period and ice thickness in lakes/rivers elevate water temperatures, triggering algal blooms and dissolved oxygen consumption. Concurrently, ice-dependent human activities and ecosystems are constrained for the following reasons: a reduced utilization period for seasonal “ice roads”, which are critical winter transportation corridors in high-latitude regions; the disruption of irrigation scheduling; the curtailment of ice tourism activities [10]; shortened winter fishing durations; and alterations in fish spawning habitats [11]. (4) Arctic sea ice loss modifies hemispheric barometric pressure and temperature differentials, increasing the frequency of cold waves, storms, and precipitation extremes [12]. In contrast, it increases the possibility of Arctic navigation. Antarctic ecosystem stability is jeopardized by the Southern Ocean Sea ice, which is in decline.
This Special Issue aims to publish comprehensive reviews, recent research, and forward-looking recommendations on ice studies spanning alpine to marine systems. By integrating research on glacial, river ice, lake ice, and sea ice, we aim to reflect the research progress made in different regions within terrestrial–marine hydroecological systems. This issue specifically investigates natural snow/ice–human interactions and explores challenges and adaptation strategies under climate change. The scope of contributions encompasses but is not limited to, physical, thermal, mechanical, optical, and electrical properties of snow and ice, alongside their multidisciplinary applications. Theoretical and practical advancements are made in remote sensing, field investigations, experimental studies, and the numerical modeling of cryospheric evolution processes. Cryospheric behaviors and their contributions to ecological and engineered systems are also explored.

2. Summaries of the Contributions

This Special Issue received 10 manuscripts, all subject to the rigorous review process of Water. In total, five papers are published in this Special Issue. Their contributions are listed in Table 1. The published papers cover lake ice, river ice, and sea ice. Their contents offer new information on questions regarding scientific developments and considerations, from studies in the literature to the data analysis of lakes over the northern hemisphere and future arctic marine operations. Regretfully, we have not received any manuscripts on glacier ice, and we hope this topic will be covered in a future Special Issue.

3. An Overview of the Published Articles

Catchment areas for rivers and lakes are important links in the terrestrial–marine hydroecological system. Lake ice exerts multifaceted impacts across natural systems and socioeconomic domains, influencing lake ecosystem functionality, human activities with associated safety considerations, regional climatic patterns, the economy, etc. [13]. The presence of snow and ice regulates mass and energy exchange processes at the air–water interface, thereby modifying critical ecological parameters, including optical characteristics, temperature, hydrodynamic circulation regimes, and dissolved gas concentrations. Furthermore, the lake ice cover acts as an ecological modulator by altering environmental determinants governing aquatic organisms [14]. Despite growing scientific attention to winter limnology, the current understanding of shifts in climate-driven ice phenology is constrained by spatially limited observational datasets, with comprehensive analyses available for only a small fraction of global lakes. There are still many lakes in other regions that are waiting to be studied. There is significant potential for research on lake ice changes associated with global warming, particularly in three key domains: lake ice phenology, ice thickness variability, and snow/ice ratios. The research objectives in lake ice phenology focus on three critical temporal parameters: the ice formation date, ice melting date, and ice-covered duration. Through long-term observational programs, comprehensive multi-year records of ice phenology have been completed in lake systems around the world. Recent analyses have yielded significant evidence establishing the linkages between climatic mechanisms and lake ice phenology alterations [15]. Concurrently, the advent of remote sensing technologies has revolutionized data acquisition capacities, enabling the systematic monitoring of ice phenology parameters across extensive territories that were previously logistically constrained [16]. This technological synergy between satellite-based observations and in situ measurements has revealed several patterns of change in lake ice, and these patterns contain information related to local hydrometeorological and geographical features [17]. Lake ice formation encompasses two distinct growth mechanisms [18]. Frozen water ice, commonly termed “black ice”, develops through downward freezing at the ice–water interface. Conversely, superimposed ice (“white ice”) originates from the freezing of slush layers atop existing ice, where slush formation occurs from the refreezing of snow mixed with lake water, meltwater, or rain. The prerequisites for these ice types exhibit differences. While cold air (with the temperature below the freezing point) constitutes the essential condition for basal lake ice growth, white ice formation additionally requires snow accumulation exceeding a third of the total ice thickness. This different climatic dependency governs their spatial distribution: temperate lacustrine systems typically contain black ice and white ice [18,19], whereas arid-region lakes predominantly develop black ice due to insufficient snowfall [20]. Mechanical property analyses reveal that black ice possesses a greater bearing capacity than white ice [21,22]. Optically, white ice has less transmissivity compared to black ice [23]. These optical differences drive critical limnological consequences: increased white ice thickness alters underwater irradiance regimes, subsequently affecting underwater biological processes (the development of phytoplankton) and heat exchange processes [14,22].
Contribution [4] collected lake ice studies in different regions of Eurasia to address the problem of black ice and white ice in the Northern Hemisphere. Arctic zone: Lake Imandra in Murmansk Oblast, Russia, and Lake Kilpisjärvi in Finland. High-altitude zone: Lake Arpi and Lake Sevan in Armenia. Temperate zone: Six lakes in Karelia, Russia, Mozhaysk Reservoir in Moscow, Oblast, Russia, and Lake Pääjärvi in Finland. Central Asian arid zone: Lake Ulansuhai in Inner Mongolia, China. The primary objective focused on recognizing patterns of change in lake ice within the context of regional climatic fluctuations. Investigations into ice composition necessitated on-site measurements, rendering ice structure analyses particularly challenging regarding remote or inaccessible lake environments. This operational constraint highlights the imperative to refine modeling approaches in order to estimate white and black ice thickness based on weather data [24]. The successful implementation of such approaches demands the integration of surface energy balance constituents, specifically temperature, solar radiation, cloudiness, snow thickness on ice, and wind. Contemporary detection techniques, such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) equipped with ground-penetrating radar (GPR), enable the spatial quantification of ice thickness and composition to determine the proportion of white ice and black ice. The Global Lake Ecological Observatory Network (GLEON), which supports lake ice research, was also presented. The observatory network conducted multiple measurements across 31 lakes in the Northern Hemisphere during the 2020–2021 winter, systematically recording the total ice thickness and white ice and black ice thickness. The results demonstrated an increase in the proportion of white ice throughout the freezing season for most lakes. Climate warming has significantly reduced black ice thickness, while white ice thickness exhibits regional divergence: the northern temperate and Arctic zones show enhanced white ice thickness, contrasting with southern temperate zones where frequent melt events and elevated precipitation suppress its development. In high-altitude and arid regions, limited snowfall/rainfall minimally contributes to the production of white ice.
The formation and melting of lake ice are closely related to the heat exchange processes with water bodies under the ice. While one-dimensional thermodynamic models adequately characterize these interactions in large lakes, their application to smaller lacustrine systems presents methodological limitations.
Contribution [1] conducted numerical simulations of radiatively driven convection (RDC) in a small ice-covered lacustrine system with a lateral pressure gradient. This study elucidated RDC’s ecological significance through its role in the transport of thermal energy, dissolved matter, and suspended particles based on the water column. Furthermore, there is a hypothesis that a continuum of convective cells exists within the convective mixed layer (CML), characterized by areas of ascending and descending water flows. Up until now, studies on the evolution of the CML under lateral transport conditions in lacustrine systems have been poor. This study employs an implicit large eddy simulation framework to reconstruct the multi-day evolution of the CML within a computational domain subject to lateral pressure gradients.
Free convection in lakes arises from gravitational instabilities induced by uneven density distributions within the water. This physical phenomenon is governed by the nonlinear dependence of water density on temperature and depth (pressure), particularly influenced by the temperature of maximum density (Tmd) [25]. The initiation and sustenance of these convective processes in lakes arise from multiple interactive mechanisms, including surface cooling [26,27], radiative heating [28], thermobaric instabilities [29], and other processes such as bioturbation, shear-driven convection, double diffusion, and river dynamics [25]. In seasonally ice-covered lakes, RDC exerts significant biological and physical influences. Convection facilitates nutrient transport to the photic zone while redistributing algal cells through the water column, thereby modulating the development of the plankton community and metabolic processes [30].
Numerical simulations comparing small ice-covered lakes with and without lateral pressure gradients revealed distinct CML conditions. Under zero pressure gradient conditions, CML exhibited multiple convective cells. When a pressure gradient was present, even a minor lateral pressure gradient resulted in structural change in convective cells, demonstrating the importance of lateral pressure gradients in the formation of the CML structure. As the lateral pressure gradients increased, the horizontal flow velocities increased, and the CML changed.
As a solid medium, river ice exerts substantial influence on channel evolution by changing hydrodynamic conditions and collisions, thus influencing hydraulic engineering design parameters. The presence of ice cover induces significant alterations to flow velocity profiles compared to open-channel conditions. This hydrodynamic transformation drives distinct sediment transport processes that reshape river channel morphology, such as the Inner Mongolia section of the Yellow River [31]. Additionally, hydraulic structures and bridges constructed in the river channel change the boundary and flow conditions of the river. Previous studies have focused on exploring ice-induced changes in the flow field [32] and the more complex phenomenon of sediment movement due to structures [33].
Rivers serve as critical hydrological connectors between lacustrine and marine systems. In cold regions, although rivers maintain flow during winter, river ice formation remains prevalent under low-temperature conditions. In general, river ice formation is a highly complex system governed by the combined action of hydrodynamic, thermodynamic, and channel topographic conditions [34]. Contemporary river ice models have predominantly evolved from these foundational theories. However, parametric uncertainties persist as a critical challenge within existing models [35]. This limitation becomes particularly pronounced when analyzing ice jam/dam formation mechanisms under the combined influence of hydrodynamics, topography, and structures. These river ice phenomena that may cause disasters depend on the morphological characteristics of ice–water and water–riverbed interfaces. The quantitative index comprises the roughness coefficients that account for the roughness corresponding to the bottom surface of the ice layer during different ice growth periods; the roughness corresponding to the flow resistance caused by the riverbed pattern during different ice growth periods; the roughness corresponding to the localized flow resistance caused by the flow field alteration near artificial structures. While straightforward in principle, these parameters are complex in practice. They are closely related to ice conditions determined by local meteorological conditions, and sediment transport and siltation under the combined influence of local riverbed geologic conditions and hydrological conditions. Furthermore, these may affect the stability of the ice structures.
Contribution [5] presents a systematic review elucidating the interactions among river ice, channel morphology, and hydraulic structures. This paper discusses recent advancements in ice research, particularly the increase in channel roughness caused by ice jams/dams. Comparative studies demonstrate that ice-covered channels exhibit up to 50% greater composite roughness than their ice-free channels, driving flow field reorganization. This alteration in roughness leads to high flow velocities in the middle of the velocity distribution while shifting shear stress downward, exceeding critical thresholds for sediment-moving occurrence. Subsequent reviews of field observations, experimental studies, and numerical simulations reveal existing problems, including future research directions. The three main conclusions and suggestions are as follows: (1) The composite roughness of the ice-covered channel is an important indicator that reflects the capacity to transport water. While many formulas exist for estimating the composite roughness of river channels during freeze-up periods, which apply to some hydraulic conditions, there are still issues that require continued scientific research. For example, the calculation of composite roughness mainly relies on surface roughness under ice cover, but there is the infeasibility of direct measurements in field tests. While indirect methods for estimating ice-bottom roughness based on flow field distribution exist, the dynamic evolution of ice jams/dams induces unsteady flow fields that fundamentally constrain the accuracy of such methods. Experimental studies and numerical simulations have been used to determine the composite roughness of river channels under different conditions. The development of field observations is still needed. (2) The evolution of riverbeds during the winter has already been the subject of preliminary conclusions reached by field observation, experimental study, and numerical simulation. These include understanding the relationship between ice jam evolution and riverbed deformation, the influence of ice jam roughness on sediment incipient motion, the relationship between the maximum sediment transport rate and water velocity under ice cover, etc. The interaction mechanism between riverbed evolution and ice jam evolution in winter is complex. Different types of local scouring occur simultaneously. (3) The problem of local scouring around hydraulic structures under ice-covered conditions is a complex research field involving multi-factor coupling. As evidenced by existing studies, the presence of hydraulic infrastructure alters the surrounding flow field, particularly increased scouring near bridge piers. Nevertheless, systematic theoretical studies and numerical simulations elucidating the scouring effect around bridge piers during ice periods remain underdeveloped.
Sea ice, formed through seawater freezing, differs from river/lake ice both macroscopically in salinity and microscopically in crystalline structure and composition. Freshwater ice on rivers and lakes comprises three phases: pure ice crystals, unfrozen water, and gas bubbles. In contrast, sea ice consists of ice crystals, brine, and gas bubbles. The alteration from freshwater to brine leads to differences in freezing temperatures and the response of ice crystal types to external forces. Crystalline structure analysis reveals the simple crystalline structure of freshwater ice, while sea ice, due to refreezing processes, has up to nine types of crystalline structures [36], differing in size, shape, and orientation of the crystals.
Porosity in freshwater ice and sea ice is defined as the volumetric fraction occupied by non-crystalline components: unfrozen water/brine and gas. In terms of materials, porosity serves as a critical assessment indicator of internal defects, thereby governing various properties of ice. In the 1980s, the influence of air bubbles on ice properties was generally considered negligible due to the low temperature of sea ice. Consequently, researchers predominantly utilized brine volume fraction determined by ice temperature and salinity as a proxy for porosity to quantify its effects on ice properties, particularly the relationship between brine content and mechanical properties. The advent of global warming has elevated ice temperatures, necessitating the incorporation of bubble volume into porosity calculations. Current methods calculate total porosity (the sum of brine volume and bubble volume) by combining ice temperature, salinity, and density. This shift requires substituting the brine volume fraction with total porosity when investigating the evolution of sea ice properties. These properties include uniaxial compressive strength [37,38], thermal diffusivity [39], dielectric permittivity [40], optical properties [40,41], and acoustic properties [40]. The growing significance of bubble volume in influencing other properties of ice establishes ice density as an essential parameter. Meanwhile, the fundamental questions regarding the composition and provenance of these gases need to be addressed. While bubbles in freshwater ice typically exhibit near-spherical shapes, bubbles in sea ice exhibit a pronounced polymorphic shape [42]. Such morphological diversity suggests more complex formation mechanisms in sea ice compared to freshwater ice.
Contribution [2] systematically investigated the potential mechanisms governing bubble formation in sea ice, including the release of air dissolved in seawater during crystallization; the replacement of heavy brine flowing down with atmospheric air; and the release of gas bubbles from the seabed sediments. This study developed a computational model to simulate the transport of gas bubbles from release to ice–water interfaces. The simulation results provide novel insights to explain the strength reduction in sea ice due to the increase in bubble volume. Furthermore, it also provides the foundation for finding near-bottom sources of natural gas by considering ice porosity characteristics, as well as discussing future research directions.
Sea ice imposes constraints on human activities in ice-covered marine regions. However, the accelerated retreat of Arctic Sea ice under global warming has been extensively documented. The Arctic Ocean’s vast natural resources stimulate growing interest in maritime operations, including commercial shipping trajectories, fishing, offshore resource extraction, and other marine activities. Accelerated sea ice retreat under climate warming mechanisms has contributed to the northward expansion of human activity areas. Contemporary Arctic marine engineering predominantly concentrates on two domains: Arctic shipping routes and ships and ice–structure interaction mechanics. These priorities have stimulated advancements in multiple research areas: integrated satellite–airborne–terrestrial observation systems for sea ice monitoring, the physical and mechanical properties of ice, and mathematical simulations of ice–structure interactions. However, documented marine accidents in the Arctic Ocean are not confined to the ice zone but also occur in the ice-free zone due to insufficient awareness of ocean physics and extreme weather. Accidents occurring in the ice-free zone of the Arctic Ocean are also important, hence the need to regulate marine activities and marine operations in the Arctic Ocean.
Contribution [3] took the ice-free or partly ice-free zones of the Norwegian Sea and the Barents Sea as representative areas of the Arctic Ocean. Based on the characteristics of marine operations in these areas, the possibility of marine operations was evaluated to guide the safety of marine operations in other ice-free zones of the Arctic Ocean. This paper systematically discusses the features of marine operations and conditions of the marine physical environment. Emphasis is placed on the conditions of wind, waves, and fog in unpredictable polar low-pressure situations. The principal challenge resides in the substantial predictive uncertainties associated with polar lows origins and trajectory, which currently impose key limitations on year-round operational feasibility. Advancements in forecast accuracy could contribute to expanding the viable operational time of marine operations. This paper defines marine activities and marine operations in the Arctic Ocean. “Marine activities” are defined as all activities associated with sea transportation, whereas “marine operations” refer to complex marine projects that require a period of restrictive meteorological conditions. These operations typically involve offshore hydrocarbon drilling and extraction, the installation and maintenance of offshore wind energy infrastructure, marine aquaculture systems, marine engineering constructions, and marine support services.
Contribution [3] reviewed the historical accidents caused by the lack of storm warning capabilities in the Norwegian Sea. For example, 210 people were lost in a storm in February 1625. In February 1848, 500 fishermen were lost. In 1899, 140 people were lost. In the ice-free Barents Sea, there have also been accidents involving fishing vessels, such as the loss of the British trawler Gaul in February 1974 in northern Norway (36 persons were lost). On 28 December 2020, the Russian fishing vessel Onega foundered in the Barents Sea, proximate to the Novaya Zemlya archipelago, resulting in 17 fatalities.
During a polar low-pressure event in late February 1987, the Norwegian Coast Guard vessel KV Nordkapp experienced ice accretion exceeding 110 tons while operating east of Bear Island, highlighting cryospheric hazards in maritime operations. The fishing vessel Destination encountered catastrophic failure during its 11 February 2017 transit from Dutch Harbor to St. Paul, Alaska, with subsequent search efforts failing to recover wreckage or survivors.
Hydrocarbon exploration and production activities have been systematically conducted in the Norwegian and Barents Seas for several years. The drilling rigs must consider the possibility of waves and structures becoming attached to ice, and therefore, they must be designed for all weather conditions [43]. Drilling operations in ice-prone marine environments necessitate the implementation of ice management to mitigate ice–structure interactions. Recently, the installation and operation of offshore wind turbines and aquaculture farms have also become elements of marine activities and offshore Arctic operations.
Contribution [3] concluded from incidents in the ice-free zones of the Barents Sea and the Norwegian Sea that the weather situation in the Arctic is uncertain. Meteorological forecasting requires prioritized integration into marine operational planning, particularly for complex marine operations necessitating limited weather spanning multiple consecutive days. From mid-May to mid-September, polar low-pressure systems in the Arctic Ocean exhibit substantial track prediction uncertainties that traditional models frequently fail to resolve. Concurrently, the retreat of summer sea ice continues to expand navigable areas, increasing the area of operations in the Arctic Ocean. And results from ice-free areas in the Barents Sea and the Norwegian Sea can support activities in other areas. Arctic marine operations necessitate strategic scheduling during optimal summer months to mitigate risks to personnel safety while preserving the vessel and infrastructure. However, the safety of marine operations necessitates accurate weather forecasts (≥24 h). Satellite data acquisition, updated every few hours, constitutes a critical prerequisite for advancing predictive capabilities in Arctic weather models. Notably, only a few satellites are currently orbiting the Earth in this area, and consideration must be given to increasing satellite coverage. In the ice-free zones of the Arctic Ocean, marine operations of longer duration (up to 2–3 days) can commence only an extended polar low-pressure period is forecast for the area.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, Z.L.; writing—review and editing, L.Z., S.T. and O.T.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The organization of this Special Issue was supported by different projects from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 32460290, 52171259) and the National Key Research and Development Program (grant numbers 2024YFC2816300, 2022YFE0107000). OTG received funding from the MAKOM II program, project number PMK 10039, a program for the development of the quality and relevance of maritime education at vocational schools, universities, and colleges in Norway.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Smirnov, S.; Smirnovsky, A.; Zdorovennova, G.; Zdorovennov, R.; Efremova, T.; Palshin, N.; Bogdanov, S. Numerical Simulation of Radiatively Driven Convection in a Small Ice-Covered Lake with a Lateral Pressure Gradient. Water 2023, 15, 3953. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15223953.
  • Goncharov, V.K.; Klementieva, N.Y. Analysis of the Role of Aquatic Gases in the Formation of Sea-Ice Porosity. Water 2024, 16, 2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16152213.
  • Gudmestad, O.T. Marine Operations in the Norwegian Sea and the Ice-Free Part of the Barents Sea with Emphasis on Polar Low Pressures. Water 2024, 16, 3313. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16223313.
  • Zdorovennova, G.; Efremova, T.; Novikova, I.; Erina, O.; Sokolov, D.; Denisov, D.; Fedorova, I.; Smirnov, S.; Palshin, N.; Bogdanov, S.; Zdorovennov, R.; Huang, W.; Leppäranta, M. Contrasting Changes in Lake Ice Thickness and Quality Due to Global Warming in the Arctic, Temperate, and Arid Zones and Highlands of Eurasia. Water 2025, 17, 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17030365.
  • Cheng, T.; Wei, J.; Ni, J.; Wang, J.; Lu, H.; Cheng, K.; Fu, H. The Impact of Ice on River Morphology and Hydraulic Structures: A Review. Water 2025, 17, 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17040480.

References

  1. Qin, D.; Yang, J.; Ren, J.; Kang, S.; Xiao, C.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, S. Cryospheric science: Research framework and disciplinary system. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2018, 5, 255–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wu, Y.; Zheng, S.; Teng, X.; Chi, H.; Ren, Y.; Yan, J.; Chen, H.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, B. Lake and river ice in the climate system-feedbacks, cycles, future trends, ecological and social dimensions of change. In Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2025; ISBN 978-0-12-409548-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ding, Y.; Wu, X.; Li, X.; Qin, J.; Wang, S.; Yang, J.; Chang, Y.; Ding, G. An introduction to some issues in cryospheric ecosystem. J. Glaciol. Geocryol. 2023, 45, 699–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liang, Q.; Wang, N. The characteristics of glacier surface velocity in the West Kunlun Mountains derived from ITS_LIVE data from 2000 to 2018. J. Glaciol. Geocryol. 2024, 46, 367–378. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. Meyrat, G.; Munch, J.; Cicoira, A.; McArdell, B.; Müller, C.R.; Frey, H.; Bartelt, P. Simulating glacier lake outburst floods (GLOFs) with a two-phase/layer debris flow model considering fluid-solid flow transitions. Landslides 2024, 21, 479–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Piao, J.; Chen, W.; Wei, K.; Cai, Q.; Zhu, X.; Du, Z. Increased dust storm frequency in North China in 2023: Climate change reflection on the Mongolian plateau. Innovation 2023, 4, 100497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nicu, I.C. Is overgrazing really influencing soil erosion? Water 2018, 10, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lolli, S.; Sauvage, L.; Loaec, S. EZ lidar dust transit phenomena observations in Seoul, Korea. In Proceedings of the Lidar Technologies, Techniques, and Measurements for Atmospheric Remote Sensing V. International Society for Optics and Photonics, Berlin, Germany, 31 August–3 September 2009; Volume 7479, pp. 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ren, S.; Jia, L.; Miles, E.S.; Menenti, M.; Kneib, M.; Shaw, T.E.; Buri, P.; McCarthy, M.J.; Yang, W.; Pellicciotti, F.; et al. Observed and projected declines in glacier albedo across the Third Pole in the 21st century. One Earth 2024, 7, 1587–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hampton, S.E.; Powers, S.M.; Dugan, H.A.; Knoll, L.B.; McMeans, B.C.; Meyer, M.F.; O’Reilly, C.M.; Ozersky, T.; Sharma, S.; Barrett, D.C.; et al. Environmental and societal consequences of winter ice loss from lakes. Sciences 2024, 386, 6718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Collingsworth, P.D.; Bunnell, D.B.; Murray, M.W.; Kao, Y.-C.; Feiner, Z.S.; Claramunt, R.M.; Lofgren, B.M.; Höök, T.O.; Ludsin, S.A. Climate change as a long-term stressor for the fisheries of the Laurentian Great Lakes of North America. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2017, 27, 363–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vermaire, J.C.; Pisaric, M.F.J.; Thienpont, J.R.; Mustaphi, C.J.C.; Kokelj, S.V.; Smol, J.P. Arctic climate warming and sea ice declines lead to increased storm surge activity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2013, 40, 1386–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Filazzola, A.; Imrit, M.A.; Fleck, A.; Woolway, R.I.; Sharma, S. Declining lake ice in response to climate change can impact spending for local communities. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0299937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kirillin, G.; Leppäranta, M.; Terzhevik, A.; Granin, N.; Bernhardt, J.; Engelhardt, C.; Efremova, T.; Golosov, S.; Palshin, N.; Sherstyankin, P.; et al. Physics of seasonally ice-covered lakes: A review. Aquat. Sci. 2012, 74, 659–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sharma, S.; Richardson, D.C.; Woolway, R.I.; Imrit, M.A.; Bouffard, D.; Blagrave, K.; Daly, J.; Filazzola, A.; Granin, N.; Korhonen, J.; et al. Loss of ice cover, shifting phenology, and more extreme events in Northern Hemisphere Lakes. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2021, 126, e2021JG006348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kropáček, J.; Maussion, F.; Chen, F.; Hoerz, S.; Hochschild, V. Analysis of ice phenology of lakes on the Tibetan Plateau from MODIS data. Cryosphere 2013, 7, 287–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tuttle, S.E.; Roof, S.R.; Retelle, M.J.; Werner, A.; Gunn, G.E.; Bunting, E.L. Evaluation of satellite-derived estimates of lake ice cover timing on Linnévatnet, Kapp Linné, Svalbard using in-situ data. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Leppäranta, M. Freezing of Lakes and Evolution of Their Ice Cover, 2nd ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; Available online: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-031-25605-9.pdf (accessed on 27 May 2025).
  19. Ashton, G.D. River and lake ice thickening, thinning, and snow ice formation. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2011, 68, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kirillin, G.B.; Shatwell, T.; Wen, L. Ice-covered lakes of Tibetan Plateau as solar heat collectors. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2021, 48, e2021GL093429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vikström, K.; Weyhenmeyer, G.; Jakobsson, E.; Peternell, M. Rapid lake ice structure changes across Swedish lakes put public ice safety at risk. Ambio 2024, 54, 122–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Weyhenmeyer, G.A.; Obertegger, U.; Rudebeck, H.; Jakobsson, E.; Jansen, J.; Zdorovennova, G.; Bansal, S.; Block, B.D.; Carey, C.C.; Doubek, J.P.; et al. Towards critical white ice conditions in lakes under global warming. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Petrov, M.P.; Terzhevik, A.Y.; Palshin, N.I.; Zdorovennov, R.E.; Zdorovennova, G.E. Absorption of solar radiation by snow-and-ice cover of lakes. Water Resour. 2005, 32, 496–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Leppäranta, M. A growth model for black ice, snow ice, and snow thickness in subarctic basins. Nord. Hydrol. 1983, 14, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bouffard, D.; Wüest, A. Convection in lakes. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2019, 51, 189–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Farmer, D.M.; Carmack, E. Wind mixing and restratification in a lake near the temperature of maximum density. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 1981, 11, 1516–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jonas, T.; Stips, A.; Eugster, W.; Wüest, A. Observations of a quasi shear-free lacustrine convective boundary layer: Stratification and its implications on turbulence. J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108, 3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jonas, T.; Terzhevik, A.Y.; Mironov, D.V.; Wüest, A. Radiatively driven convection in an ice-covered lake investigated by using temperature microstructure technique. J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108, 3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Carmack, E.; Vagle, S. Thermobaric processes both drive and constrain seasonal ventilation in deep Great Slave Lake, Canada. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 2021, 126, e2021JF006288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, B.; Wells, M.G.; Li, J.; Young, J. Mixing, stratification, and plankton under lake-ice during winter in a large lake: Implications for spring dissolved oxygen levels. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2020, 65, 2713–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, J.; Fu, H.; Yi, M.; Sun, X.; Chen, P. The simulation of flow velocity profile under ice cover. J. Glaciol. Geocryol. 2009, 31, 705–710. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  32. Luo, H.; Ji, H.; Chen, Z.; Liu, B.; Xue, Z.; Li, Z. An analytical study for predicting incipient motion velocity of sediments under ice cover. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jia, X.; Mou, X.; Ji, H. Experimental study on local scour protection and contact pressure of the facing water surface at the pier based on the guide pillar. Ocean Eng. 2024, 302, 117670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pan, J.; Shen, H.T.; Guo, X.; Wang, T. A two-dimensional flow-ice-sediment coupled model for rivers I: Theory and methods. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2021, 52, 700–711. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tan, B.; Li, C.; Hu, S.; Li, Z.; Ji, H.; Deng, Y.; Zhang, L. Review and prospect of the uncertainties in mathematical models and methods for Yellow River ice. Water 2025, 17, 1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shokr, M.E.; Sinha, N.K. Arctic sea ice microstructure observation relevant to microwave scattering. Arctic 1994, 47, 265–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mellor, M. Mechanical behavior of sea ice. In The Geophysics of Sea Ice; NATO ASI, Series; Untersteiner, N., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1986; pp. 165–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Song, Z.; Hou, L.; Whister, D.; Gao, G. Mesoscopic numerical investigation of dynamic mechanical properties of ice with entrapped air bubbles based on a stochastic sparse distribution mechanism. Compos. Struct. 2020, 236, 111834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, Z.; Fu, X.; Shi, L.; Huang, W.; Li, C. Inversely identified natural ice thermal diffusivity by using measured vertical ice temperature profiles: Recent advancement and considerations. J. Glaciol. Geocryol. 2023, 45, 599–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tucker, W.B., III; Perovich, D.K.; Gow, A.J.; Weeks, W.F.; Drinkwater, M.R. Physical properties of sea ice relevant to remote sensing. Geophys. Monogr. Ser. 1992, 68, 9–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Malinka, A.; Zege, E.; Heygster, G.; Istomina, E. Reflective properties of white sea ice and snow. Cryosphere 2016, 10, 2541–2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Light, B.; Maykut, G.A.; Grenfell, T.C. Effects of temperature on the microstructure of first-year Arctic sea ice. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 2003, 108, 3051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ryerson, C.C. Ice protection of offshore platforms. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2011, 65, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Disciplinary structure of Cryospheric Science (from [1]).
Figure 1. Disciplinary structure of Cryospheric Science (from [1]).
Water 17 01754 g001
Figure 2. Schematic map of Cryospheric Science Tree (from [1]).
Figure 2. Schematic map of Cryospheric Science Tree (from [1]).
Water 17 01754 g002
Table 1. Summaries of the contributions in this Special Issue.
Table 1. Summaries of the contributions in this Special Issue.
Number of ContributionsResearch AreaFocusResearch MethodsPotential Applications
1Lake iceRadiatively driven convection with a lateral pressure gradient under lake iceNumerical modelingThree-dimensional water eddy and algae developments under lake ice
2Sea iceSea ice gas bubble resources and analysisLiterature survey and theoretical analysisDetermining where gas bubbles come from, and using gas bubbles in ice to evaluate gas escape, especially for the pollution from natural gas
3Sea iceArctic open-water wave effect on marine activities and operationsLiterature surveyThe experience of regulators and operations in the Arctic open-water in the Norwegian Sea and the Barents Sea can be relevant to other Arctic regions in the future
4Lake iceClimate impact assessment on the white ice to black ice ratio in lakes for the total ice thicknessData analysis and reviewLake ice characteristics are changing with climate change
5River iceWater flow distribution and ice and its impact on sediment movementLiterature surveyFor a river with sediments like the Yellow River, the morphology varies during the winter period
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Z.; Zhou, L.; Tavakoli, S.; Gudmestad, O.T. Natural Ice/Snow and Humans: From Mountain to Sea. Water 2025, 17, 1754. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17121754

AMA Style

Li Z, Zhou L, Tavakoli S, Gudmestad OT. Natural Ice/Snow and Humans: From Mountain to Sea. Water. 2025; 17(12):1754. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17121754

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Zhijun, Li Zhou, Sasan Tavakoli, and Ove Tobias Gudmestad. 2025. "Natural Ice/Snow and Humans: From Mountain to Sea" Water 17, no. 12: 1754. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17121754

APA Style

Li, Z., Zhou, L., Tavakoli, S., & Gudmestad, O. T. (2025). Natural Ice/Snow and Humans: From Mountain to Sea. Water, 17(12), 1754. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17121754

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop