Next Article in Journal
Spatial and Temporal Distribution Patterns of Fish in Large Deep-Water Lakes and Their Association with Environmental Factors Assessed Through Hydroacoustic Methods: A Case Study of Qiandao Lake, China
Previous Article in Journal
Investigating the Element Geochemical Behavior and Provenance of Surface Sediments in the Offshore Area of Sierra Leone, Africa: Insights from Major and Trace Elements
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Groundwater Pollution Control and Groundwater Management

1
Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China
2
Sichuan Province Engineering Technology Research Center of Ecological Mitigation of Geohazards in Tibet Plateau Transportation Corridors, Chengdu 611756, China
3
Yibin Research Institute, Southwest Jiaotong University, Yibin 644000, China
4
State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Resources and Environment, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
5
School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Sichuan University of Science & Engineering, Zigong 643000, China
6
School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2024, 16(23), 3542; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16233542
Submission received: 2 December 2024 / Revised: 7 December 2024 / Accepted: 8 December 2024 / Published: 9 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Topic Groundwater Pollution Control and Groundwater Management)

1. Introduction

Groundwater, the water that resides beneath the Earth’s surface, serves as a crucial resource for human consumption, agriculture, and industrial activities [1,2,3]. It is estimated that over two billion people globally rely on groundwater as their primary source of drinking water. This vital resource is significant for sustaining life and plays an integral role in the Earth’s hydrological cycle [4,5,6]. Groundwater systems are inherently complex and dynamic, interacting with various environmental components, including soil, surface water, and ecosystems. Given the increasing demand for freshwater due to population growth and climate change, understanding the groundwater environment and its vulnerability to pollution has never been more critical [7,8,9]. This topic aims to delve into the intricacies of groundwater systems, the factors leading to their contamination, and the implications of pollution on health and the environment.
The contamination of groundwater has emerged as a pressing global concern, with numerous studies highlighting its diverse sources and the complex interactions contributing to its degradation [10,11,12]. Pollutants such as agricultural runoff, industrial discharges, untreated wastewater, and chemical products infiltrate the groundwater through various pathways [13,14,15]. These contaminants can significantly alter groundwater quality, posing threats to human health and the ecosystems that depend on this resource. For instance, the presence of heavy metals, nitrates, and pathogens in groundwater has been linked to severe health conditions that primarily affect vulnerable populations, further exacerbating social and economic inequalities [16]. Moreover, the infiltration of pollutants can lead to long-term environmental challenges, compromising the sustainability of freshwater resources and ecosystems.
In addition to understanding the sources and pathways of groundwater pollution, the impacts of anthropogenic activities on this vital resource must also be examined [17,18,19]. Urbanization and industrialization have increased the pressures on groundwater resources, often leading to overextraction and contamination [20,21,22]. The correlation between land use changes and groundwater quality illustrates the need for integrated water resource management practices that account for human activities. Effective groundwater management is essential to mitigate pollution and safeguard this invaluable resource. Furthermore, the adoption of best practices in agriculture and industry can significantly reduce the input of contaminants into groundwater systems [23,24,25]. Public awareness campaigns and community engagement are equally important in promoting the stewardship of groundwater resources and encouraging sustainable practices among users.
To effectively address groundwater pollution, interdisciplinary research and collaboration among scientists, policymakers, and local communities are crucial. This research paper will explore various case studies and scientific findings that elucidate the state of groundwater pollution and the efficacy of different management strategies [26,27,28]. By synthesizing the existing literature, analyzing field data, and highlighting successful remediation efforts, this study aims to contribute to the ongoing dialog surrounding groundwater sustainability. Ultimately, the goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the complexities of groundwater systems, the multifaceted nature of contamination, and the paths toward effective management and conservation efforts. As we navigate the challenges posed by climate change and increasing water demand, safeguarding our groundwater resources is imperative for ensuring a sustainable future for global populations. The topic “Groundwater Pollution Control and Groundwater Management”, published in multiple MDPI journals (Geosciences, Hydrology, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Remote Sensing, and Water), aims to address these critical areas. With the publication of this Topic, we strive to explore the new knowledge of groundwater pollution control and groundwater management.

2. Findings Reported in the Topic

This Special Issue includes 32 research articles. These 32 papers can be clustered into three main topical groups: hydrochemical characteristics and water quality, groundwater resource management, and groundwater pollution remediation.
The topic of hydrochemical characteristics and water quality is discussed in the following articles: Yin et al. (2022) explored the spatiotemporal correlation of saline–alkali land and salt-leaching irrigation with groundwater in the Hetao Plain [contribution 1]. Yu et al. (2022) investigated the major factors affecting the hydrochemical process of groundwater and surface water in the lower reaches of the Yarlung-Zangbo River, southern Tibet [contribution 2]. Tang et al. (2023) analyzed the hydrochemical characteristics and water quality of shallow groundwater in the desert area of the southern margin of the Tarim Basin [contribution 3]. Mohamed et al. (2023) evaluated the drinking and irrigation qualities of groundwater and surface water in hyper-arid environments of Egypt [contribution 4]. Mohsine et al. (2023) explored multiscale variability in groundwater quality [contribution 5]. Wang et al. (2023) evaluated the suitability of groundwater quality for drinking and irrigation purposes in Suining city of southwestern China [contribution 6]. Al-Mahasneh et al. (2023) assessed the characterization of the quality and safety of groundwater in water wells in Jordan [contribution 7]. Torres-Rivera et al. (2023) investigated anthropogenic contamination by fecal coliform bacteria, total coliform, nitrate, and potentially toxic elements in the free aquifer of the San Luis Potosí Valley [contribution 8]. Laonamsai et al. (2023) analyzed groundwater quality variations in multiple aquifers [contribution 9]. Xiao et al. (2023) analyzed hydrochemical characteristics and the formation mechanism of Quaternary Groundwater in Baoshan Basin, Western Yunnan, China [contribution 10]. Traoré et al. (2023) assessed the quality of urban groundwater in Ouagadougou for the first time [contribution 11]. Liu et al. (2023) explored the hydrochemical processes and conducted a quality assessment of groundwater [contribution 12]. Yu et al. (2023) analyzed trace element pollution levels and the non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks posed by groundwater resources in Sichuan Basin, SW China [contribution 13].
The contributions focusing on water resource management are as follows: Zhang et al. (2023) clarified the genetic mechanism of geothermal waters in Kangding area, SW China [contribution 14]. Lv et al. (2023) analyzed the water–rock interactions, genesis mechanism, and mineral scaling of geothermal waters in Northwestern Sichuan, SW China [contribution 15]. Vengust et al. (2023) used a comprehensive approach to conceptualize and identify the functioning of two connected aquifer systems in northeastern Slovenia [contribution 16]. Chidichimo et al. (2023) provided a geological–structural and hydrogeological numerical modeling of a metamorphic aquifer in a large area of the Sila Piccola in Calabria [contribution 17]. Tzimopoulos et al. (2023) used a fuzzy analytical solution of the horizontal diffusion equation to analyze the vadose zone [contribution 18]. Liu et al. (2023) analyzed the seawater intrusion process in coastal areas [contribution 19]. Pinardi et al. (2023) investigated the hydraulic interconnections and built a hydrogeological map for the Parma Alluvial Aquifer and Taro River Basin (Northern Italy) [contribution 20]. Al-Zubari et al. (2023) evaluated the existing monitoring network of groundwater quality using the geostatistical method of kriging [contribution 21]. Eftimi et al. (2023) analyzed and classified the hydrogeological aspects of the sources of the water supply for the settlements of Albania [contribution 22]. Martin and Langman (2023) evaluated the weathering of waste rock for backfill aquifers in Restored Coal Mine Pits, Powder River Basin, USA [contribution 23]. Saputra et al. (2024) constructed a conceptual framework for modeling the spatiotemporal dynamics of diesel attenuation capacity [contribution 24]. Imsamranrat and Leelasantitham (2024) assessed the vulnerability of groundwater resources using the new DRASTIC-LP in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand [contribution 25]. Yang et al. (2024) analyzed the genesis and mineral scaling of the Yangbajing Geothermal Field, Southwestern China [contribution 26].
Studies focusing on the remediation of groundwater pollution are presented as follows: Hao et al. (2022) conducted V(V) remediation processes using various kinds of auxiliary fillers’ agricultural biomass and microbial enhancements [contribution 27]. Yuan et al. (2022) used in situ pumping–injection to remediate strong-acid–high-salt groundwater and achieved optimization [contribution 28]. Zhang et al. (2022) explored the optimal conditions for the adsorption of Cd2+ in serpentine by using response surface methodology [contribution 29]. Feo et al. (2023) conducted a series of simulations of free-product DNAPL extraction [contribution 30]. Yun et al. (2023) conducted an in situ groundwater remediation process using a tablet-based, slow-release oxidizer to manage hazardous contaminants in urban areas [contribution 31]. Nguyen et al. (2023) investigated the characteristics and transport of oxygen-doped graphitic carbon nitride (OgCN) and evaluated the transport of OgCN under various conditions [contribution 32].

3. Future Directions

As we look to the future of groundwater management and pollution mitigation, it is imperative to adopt a multifaceted approach that encompasses technological innovation, policy reform, and community engagement [29,30,31]. Groundwater resources are under increasing pressure from population growth, industrial activities, and climate change, necessitating the development of advanced strategies for monitoring and protection. One promising direction is the integration of cutting-edge technologies such as remote sensing, machine learning, and Internet of Things sensors [32,33,34]. These tools can enhance our ability to track groundwater levels and quality in real-time, providing invaluable data for decision-makers. By leveraging big data analytics, researchers can identify patterns in groundwater depletion and contamination, allowing for more proactive management strategies. Future studies should focus on refining these technologies, making them more accessible and cost-effective to allow for their widespread application in both urban and rural settings.
Another critical area for future research is the intersection of groundwater management and climate change [35,36,37]. The impacts of climate variability on hydrological cycles are profound, influencing groundwater recharge rates and pollution dynamics. As extreme weather events become more frequent, understanding these interactions will be vital for developing resilient groundwater systems. Future studies should emphasize the need for adaptive management frameworks that incorporate climate projections into groundwater resource planning. This could involve creating hydrological models that simulate various climate scenarios, enabling stakeholders to anticipate changes and implement mitigation strategies effectively. Furthermore, interdisciplinary research that combines hydrology, ecology, and social science will be essential to address the complex challenges posed by climate change regarding groundwater systems.
In addition to technological and climate-related advancements, the governance of groundwater resources requires urgent attention [38,39,40]. Effective governance frameworks are essential for ensuring equitable access to groundwater and the sustainable use of groundwater, as well as to protect against pollution. Future research directions should explore collaborative governance models that involve multiple stakeholders, including government agencies, local communities, and private sector entities. Engaging these groups in decision-making processes can lead to more inclusive policies that reflect the diverse needs and values of different user groups. Research should also assess existing legal frameworks governing groundwater use and pollution, identifying gaps and proposing reforms that could enhance accountability and enforcement. By fostering a sense of shared responsibility among stakeholders, we can create more resilient and sustainable groundwater management systems.
Lastly, public awareness and education are crucial for the long-term success of groundwater management initiatives [41,42,43]. Many communities remain unaware of the critical role groundwater plays in their daily lives and the potential threats it faces from pollution and overextraction. Future efforts should prioritize educational programs that inform the public about groundwater issues, promoting stewardship and responsible usage practices. These could include community workshops, school programs, and outreach campaigns that highlight the importance of groundwater conservation. Additionally, involving local communities in monitoring and management efforts can empower individuals to take action in protecting their water resources. By fostering a culture of awareness and engagement, we can build a stronger collective commitment to safeguarding groundwater for future generations.
In conclusion, the future of groundwater management and pollution mitigation hinges on our ability to innovate, collaborate, and educate. By harnessing advanced technologies, addressing the impacts of climate change, reforming governance structures, and enhancing public awareness, we can develop a comprehensive framework that ensures the sustainable use of groundwater resources. As we move forward, it is essential to remain adaptable and responsive to emerging challenges, prioritizing holistic approaches that integrate scientific research, community involvement, and effective policymaking. Through these concerted efforts, we can secure the health and longevity of our vital groundwater systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z., L.H. and Q.H.; investigation, Y.Z., L.H. and Q.H.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, Q.H.; project administration, Y.Z., L.H. and Q.H.; data curation, Z.X.; funding acquisition, Y.Z., L.H. and Q.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support has been received from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42102334, 42072313, and 51908021), Sichuan Science and Technology Program (No. 2023YFS0356, 2024NSFSC0888), Open funding of State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Resources and Environment (East China University of Technology) (No. 2022NRE06) and Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by BAST (No. BYESS2023129).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Yin, S.; Tian, Y.; Yang, L.; Wen, Q.; Wei, B. Dynamics of Spatiotemporal Variation of Groundwater Arsenic Due to Salt-Leaching Irrigation and Saline-Alkali Land. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 5586.
  • Yu, X.; Yuan, X.; Guo, H.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, H.; Luo, T.; Gong, Z.; Huang, H. Coupling Hydrochemistry and Stable Isotopes (δ2H, δ18O and 87Sr/86Sr) to Identify the Major Factors Affecting the Hydrochemical Process of Groundwater and Surface Water in the Lower Reaches of the Yarlung-Zangbo River, Southern Tibet, Southwestern China. Water 2022, 14, 3906.
  • Tang, R.; Dong, S.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, C.; Li, P.; Bai, M. Hydrochemical Characteristics and Water Quality of Shallow Groundwater in Desert Area of Kunyu City, Southern Margin of Tarim Basin, China. Water 2023, 15, 1563.
  • Mohamed, A.; Asmoay, A.; Alarifi, S.S.; Mohammed, M.A.A. Simulation of Surface and Subsurface Water Quality in Hyper-Arid Environments. Hydrology 2023, 10, 86.
  • Mohsine, I.; Kacimi, I.; Abraham, S.; Valles, V.; Barbiero, L.; Dassonville, F.; Bahaj, T.; Kassou, N.; Touiouine, A.; Jabrane, M.; et al. Exploring Multiscale Variability in Groundwater Quality: A Comparative Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Patterns via Clustering. Water 2023, 15, 1603.
  • Wang, Y.; Li, R.; Wu, X.; Yan, Y.; Wei, C.; Luo, M.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, Y. Evaluation of Groundwater Quality for Drinking and Irrigation Purposes Using GIS-Based IWQI, EWQI and HHR Model. Water 2023, 15, 2233.
  • Al-Mahasneh, M.; Al Bsoul, A.; Al-Ananzeh, N.; Al-Khasawane, H.E.; Al-Mahasneh, M.; Tashtoush, R. The Characterization of Groundwater Quality for Safe Drinking Water Wells via Disinfection and Sterilization in Jordan: A Case Study. Hydrology 2023, 10, 135.
  • Torres-Rivera, S.; Torres-Hernández, J.R.; Carranco-Lozada, S.E.; García-Arreola, M.E.; López-Doncel, R.A.; Montenegro-Ríos, J.A. Anthropogenic Contamination in the Free Aquifer of the San Luis Potosí Valley. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 6152.
  • Laonamsai, J.; Pawana, V.; Chipthamlong, P.; Chomcheawchan, P.; Kamdee, K.; Kimmany, B.; Julphunthong, P. Groundwater Quality Variations in Multiple Aquifers: A Comprehensive Evaluation for Public Health and Agricultural Use. Geosciences 2023, 13, 195.
  • Xiao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Long, A.; Xu, S.; Guo, T.; Gu, X.; Deng, X.; Zhang, P. Hydrochemical Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Quaternary Groundwater in Baoshan Basin, Western Yunnan, China. Water 2023, 15, 2736.
  • Traoré, O.; Kpoda, D.S.; Dembélé, R.; Saba, C.K.S.; Cairns, J.; Barro, N.; Haukka, K. Microbiological and Physicochemical Quality of Groundwater and Risk Factors for Its Pollution in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Water 2023, 15, 3734.
  • Liu, J.; Yang, C.; Chen, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Kang, W.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Hu, Q.; Yuan, X. Hydrochemical Appraisal and Driving Forces of Groundwater Quality and Potential Health Risks of Nitrate in Typical Agricultural Area of Southwestern China. Water 2023, 15, 4095.
  • Yu, Z.; Yao, R.; Huang, X.; Yan, Y. Health Risk Appraisal of Trace Elements in Groundwater in an Urban Area: A Case Study of Sichuan Basin, Southwest China. Water 2023, 15, 4286.
  • Zhang, X.; Deng, C.; Feng, T.; Zhang, Y. Geochemical Investigations of the Geothermal Waters in the Kangding Area, SW China: Constraints from Hydrochemistry and D-O-T Isotopy. Water 2023, 15, 2761.
  • Lv, G.; Zhang, X.; Wei, D.; Yu, Z.; Yuan, X.; Sun, M.; Kong, X.; Zhang, Y. Water–Rock Interactions, Genesis Mechanism, and Mineral Scaling of Geothermal Waters in Northwestern Sichuan, SW China. Water 2023, 15, 3730.
  • Vengust, A.; Koroša, A.; Urbanc, J.; Mali, N. Development of Groundwater Flow Models for the Integrated Management of the Alluvial Aquifer Systems of Dravsko polje and Ptujsko polje, Slovenia. Hydrology 2023, 10, 68.
  • Chidichimo, F.; De Biase, M.; Muto, F.; Straface, S. Modeling a Metamorphic Aquifer through a Hydro-Geophysical Approach: The Gap between Field Data and System Complexity. Hydrology 2023, 10, 80.
  • Tzimopoulos, C.; Samarinas, N.; Papadopoulos, B.; Evangelides, C. Fuzzy Analytical Solution of Horizontal Diffusion Equation into the Vadose Zone. Hydrology 2023, 10, 107.
  • Liu, H.; Gao, L.; Ma, C.; Yuan, Y. Analysis of the Seawater Intrusion Process Based on Multiple Monitoring Methods: Study in the Southern Coastal Plain of Laizhou Bay, China. Water 2023, 15, 2013.
  • Pinardi, R.; Feo, A.; Ruffini, A.; Celico, F. Purpose-Designed Hydrogeological Maps for Wide Interconnected Surface–Groundwater Systems: The Test Example of Parma Alluvial Aquifer and Taro River Basin (Northern Italy). Hydrology 2023, 10, 127.
  • Al-Zubari, W.; Al-Shaabani, A.; Abdulhameid, N. Spatial Optimization of the Groundwater Quality Monitoring Network in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Water 2023, 15, 2169.
  • Eftimi, R.; Shehu, K.; Sara, F. Hydrogeological Aspects of the Municipal Water Supply of Albania: Situation and Problems. Hydrology 2023, 10, 193.
  • Martin, J.; Langman, J.B. Leachate Experiments to Evaluate Weathering of Waste Rock for Backfill Aquifers in Restored Coal Mine Pits, Powder River Basin, USA. Geosciences 2024, 14, 4.
  • Saputra, L.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, K.-J.; Ki, S.J.; Jo, H.Y.; Lee, S.; Chung, J. A Conceptual Framework for Modeling Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Diesel Attenuation Capacity: A Case Study across Namyangju, South Korea. Hydrology 2024, 11, 19.
  • Imsamranrat, C.; Leelasantitham, A. Assessing Groundwater Resources Vulnerability with the New DRASTIC-LP: A Case Study in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. Water 2024, 16, 547.
  • Yang, H.; Yuan, X.; Chen, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhan, C.; Lv, G.; Hu, J.; Sun, M.; Zhang, Y. Geochemical Evidence Constraining Genesis and Mineral Scaling of the Yangbajing Geothermal Field, Southwestern China. Water 2024, 16, 24.
  • Hao, L.; Li, L.; Wang, B.; Wang, X.; Shi, J.; Shi, C.; Hao, X. Performance and Enhancement of Various Fillers Guiding Vanadium (V) Bioremediation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 14926.
  • Yuan, F.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J.; Chen, H.; Barnie, S. In Situ Pumping–Injection Remediation of Strong Acid–High Salt Groundwater: Displacement–Neutralization Mechanism and Influence of Pore Blocking. Water 2022, 14, 2720.
  • Zhang, X.; Du, L.; Jin, W. Screening and Optimization of Conditions for the Adsorption of Cd2+ in Serpentine by Using Response Surface Methodology. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16848.
  • Feo, A.; Lo Medico, F.; Rizzo, P.; Morticelli, M.G.; Pinardi, R.; Rotigliano, E.; Celico, F. How to Predict the Efficacy of Free-Product DNAPL Pool Extraction Using 3D High-Precision Numerical Simulations: An Interdisciplinary Test Study in South-Western Sicily (Italy). Hydrology 2023, 10, 143.
  • Yun, G.; Park, S.; Kim, Y.; Han, K. Development of Slow-Releasing Tablets Combined with Persulfate and Ferrous Iron for In Situ Chemical Oxidation in Trichloroethylene-Contaminated Aquifers. Water 2023, 15, 4103.
  • Nguyen, T.-T.; Kim, D.-G.; Ko, S.-O. Transport of Oxygen-Doped Graphitic Carbon Nitride in Saturated Sand: Effects of Concentration, Grain Size, and Ionic Strength. Water 2024, 16, 6.

References

  1. Zhan, Y.; Guo, Z.; Ruzzante, S.; Gleeson, T.; Andrews, C.B.; Babovic, V.; Zheng, C. Assessment of spatiotemporal risks for nationwide groundwater nitrate contamination. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 947, 174508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Akurugu, B.A.; Obuobie, E.; Yidana, S.M.; Stisen, S.; Seidenfaden, I.K.; Chegbeleh, L.P. Groundwater resources assessment in the Densu Basin: A review. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 2022, 40, 101017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Marin, M.; Clinciu, I.; Tudose, N.C.; Ungurean, C.; Adorjani, A.; Mihalache, A.L.; Davidescu, A.A.; Davidescu, S.O.; Dinca, L.; Cacovean, H. Assessing the vulnerability of water resources in the context of climate changes in a small forested watershed using SWAT: A review. Environ. Res. 2020, 184, 109330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, P.; Huang, H.; Huang, X. Hydrochemical characteristics and D–O–Sr isotopes of groundwater and surface water in the northern Longzi county of southern Tibet (southwestern China). Open Geosci. 2022, 14, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, Y.; Yuan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xiao, Y.; Duo, J.; Huang, X.; Sun, M.; Lv, G. Hydrochemical, D–O–Sr isotopic and electromagnetic characteristics of geothermal waters from the Erdaoqiao area, SW China: Insights into genetic mechanism and scaling potential. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023, 158, 105486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Picetti, R.; Deeney, M.; Pastorino, S.; Miller, M.R.; Shah, A.; Leon, D.A.; Dangour, A.D.; Green, R. Nitrate and nitrite contamination in drinking water and cancer risk: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Environ. Res. 2022, 210, 112988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Luo, H.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Yang, S.; Wu, X.; Wang, Y. Hydrochemical appraisal and suitability for irrigation and portable purposes in eastern Himalayan syntaxis of Tibet Plateau. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2024, 136, 103713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Luo, M.; Wei, C.; Huang, X.; Xiao, Y.; Qin, L.; Pei, Q. Hydrochemistry and Entropy-Based Groundwater Quality Assessment in the Suining Area, Southwestern China. J. Chem. 2021, 2021, 5591892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Uddin, M.G.; Nash, S.; Olbert, A.I. A review of water quality index models and their use for assessing surface water quality. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 122, 107218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Y.; Yan, Y.; Yao, R.; Wei, D.; Huang, X.; Luo, M.; Wei, C.; Chen, S.; Yang, C. Natural background levels, source apportionment and health risks of potentially toxic elements in groundwater of highly urbanized area. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 935, 173276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, X.; Huang, X.; Zhang, Y. Spatio-temporal analysis of groundwater chemistry, quality and potential human health risks in the Pinggu basin of North China Plain: Evidence from high-resolution monitoring dataset of 2015–2017. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 800, 149568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Han, J.; Destouni, G.; Jarsjö, J.; Zhang, Q.; Cantoni, J.; Zhang, C. Legacy sources determine current water quality: Nitrogen and phosphorus in streams of Australia, China, Sweden and USA. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 954, 176407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, R.; Yan, Y.; Xu, J.; Yang, C.; Chen, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Evaluate the groundwater quality and human health risks for sustainable drinking and irrigation purposes in mountainous region of Chongqing, Southwest China. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2024, 264, 104344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fida, M.; Li, P.; Wang, Y.; Alam, S.M.K.; Nsabimana, A. Water Contamination and Human Health Risks in Pakistan: A Review. Expo. Health 2022, 15, 619–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lancia, M.; Yao, Y.; Andrews, C.; Wang, X.; Kuang, X.; Ni, J.; Gorelick, S.; Scanlon, B.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, C. The China groundwater crisis: A mechanistic analysis with implications for global sustainability. Sustain. Horiz. 2022, 4, 100042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ruan, D.; Bian, J.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Gu, Z. Identification of groundwater pollution sources and health risk assessment in the Songnen Plain based on PCA-APCS-MLR and trapezoidal fuzzy number-Monte Carlo stochastic simulation model. J. Hydrol. 2024, 632, 130897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yao, R.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, Y.; Wu, X.; Uddin, M.G.; Wei, D.; Huang, X.; Tang, L. Natural Background Level, Source Apportionment and Health Risk Assessment of Potentially Toxic Elements in Multi-layer Aquifers of Arid Area in Northwest China. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 479, 135663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tang, L.; Yao, R.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, W.; Wang, J.; Kang, J.; Liu, G.; Zhang, W.; Li, X. Hydrochemical analysis and groundwater suitability for drinking and irrigation in an arid agricultural area of the Northwest China. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2023, 259, 104256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mohammed, S.; Arshad, S.; Bashir, B.; Vad, A.; Alsalman, A.; Harsányi, E. Machine learning driven forecasts of agricultural water quality from rainfall ionic characteristics in Central Europe. Agric. Water Manag. 2024, 293, 108690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, R.; Wei, C.; Luo, M.; Yang, C.; Chen, S.; Huang, X. Groundwater suitability assessment for irrigation and drinking purposes by integrating spatial analysis, machine learning, water quality index, and health risk model. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 39155–39176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, X.; Chen, Q.; Yu, J.; Ma, Y.; Liu, H.; Tu, C. Hydrological processes in multi-layered aquifers of a karst watershed with coal mining activity: Insights from hydrochemistry and isotopes. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 2024, 56, 102016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, J.; Lou, K.; Gao, Z.; Wang, Y.; Li, Q.; Tan, M. Comprehending hydrochemical fingerprint, spatial patterns, and driving forces of groundwater in a topical coastal plain of Northern China based on hydrochemical and isotopic evaluations. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 461, 142640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, S.; Wei, D.; Zhang, J.; Li, Q.; Yao, R.; Wu, X.; Wang, Y. Optimized groundwater quality evaluation using unsupervised machine learning, game theory and Monte-Carlo simulation. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 371, 122902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chaudhari, M.P.; George, A.; Sanyal, M.; Shrivastav, P.S. Hydrochemistry and groundwater quality assessment of Gujarat, India: A compendious review. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2024, 135, 103635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ambade, B.; Sethi, S.S.; Patidar, K.; Gautam, S.; Alshehri, M. Assessing variability and hydrochemical characteristics of groundwater fluoride contamination and its associated health risks in East Singhbhum district of Jharkhand, India. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 478, 135498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, Z.; Wu, X.; Tu, C.; Chen, Q.; Tao, L. Source Apportionment and Human Health Risks of Potentially Toxic Elements in the Surface Water of Coal Mining Areas. Toxics 2024, 12, 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yao, R.; Yan, Y.; Wei, C.; Luo, M.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, Y. Hydrochemical Characteristics and Groundwater Quality Assessment Using an Integrated Approach of the PCA, SOM, and Fuzzy c-Means Clustering: A Case Study in the Northern Sichuan Basin. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 907872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Panagiotou, C.F.; Kyriakidis, P.; Tziritis, E. Application of geostatistical methods to groundwater salinization problems: A review. J. Hydrol. 2022, 615, 128566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Abba, S.I.; Yassin, M.A.; Jibril, M.M.; Tawabini, B.; Soupios, P.; Khogali, A.; Shah, S.M.H.; Usman, J.; Aljundi, I.H. Nitrate concentrations tracking from multi-aquifer groundwater vulnerability zones: Insight from machine learning and spatial mapping. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2024, 184, 1143–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, S.; Lian, H.; Xu, B.; Thanh, H.V.; Chen, W.; Yin, H.; Dai, Z. Application of robust deep learning models to predict mine water inflow: Implication for groundwater environment management. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 871, 162056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yan, J.; Chen, J.; Zhang, W. A new probabilistic assessment process for human health risk (HHR) in groundwater with extensive fluoride and nitrate optimized by non parametric estimation method. Water Res. 2023, 243, 120379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yang, X.; Du, J.; Jia, C.; Yang, T.; Shao, S. Unravelling integrated groundwater management in pollution-prone agricultural cities: A synergistic approach combining probabilistic risk, source apportionment and artificial intelligence. J. Hazard. Mater. 2025, 481, 136514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xue, J.; Yuan, C.; Ji, X.; Zhang, M. Predictive modeling of nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in rivers using a machine learning framework: A case study in an urban-rural transitional area in Wenzhou China. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 910, 168521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tian, Y.; Liu, Q.; Ji, Y.; Dang, Q.; Sun, Y.; He, X.; Liu, Y.; Su, J. Prediction of sulfate concentrations in groundwater in areas with complex hydrogeological conditions based on machine learning. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 923, 171312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Huang, Y.; Cai, Y.; He, Y.; Dai, C.; Wan, H.; Guo, H. A water quality prediction approach for the Downstream and Delta of Dongjiang River Basin under the joint effects of water intakes, pollution sources, and climate change. J. Hydrol. 2024, 640, 131686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rotiroti, M.; Sacchi, E.; Caschetto, M.; Zanotti, C.; Fumagalli, L.; Biasibetti, M.; Bonomi, T.; Leoni, B. Groundwater and surface water nitrate pollution in an intensively irrigated system: Sources, dynamics and adaptation to climate change. J. Hydrol. 2023, 623, 129868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xie, C.; Zhao, L.; Eastoe, C.J.; Wang, N.; Dong, X. An isotope study of the Shule River Basin, Northwest China: Sources and groundwater residence time, sulfate sources and climate change. J. Hydrol. 2022, 612, 128043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zheng, P.; Wang, H.; Wei, D.; Pu, C.; He, Z. Environmental governance capability and water quality: A quasi-natural experiment based on the Ten-point Water Plan. Urban. Clim. 2022, 41, 101050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhong, C.; Yang, Q.; Liang, J.; Ma, H. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation with AHP and entropy methods and health risk assessment of groundwater in Yinchuan Basin, northwest China. Environ. Res. 2022, 204, 111956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Aein, R.; Alizadeh, H. Integrated hydro-economic modeling for optimal design of development scheme of salinity affected irrigated agriculture in Helleh River Basin. Agric. Water Manag. 2021, 243, 106505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pérez-Blanco, C.D.; Essenfelder, A.H.; Gutiérrez-Martín, C. A tale of two rivers: Integrated hydro-economic modeling for the evaluation of trading opportunities and return flow externalities in inter-basin agricultural water markets. J. Hydrol. 2020, 584, 124676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, H.; Mahmud, M.A.; Arzaghi, E.; Abbassi, R.; Chen, D.; Xu, B. Assessments of economic benefits for hydro-wind power systems: Development of advanced model and quantitative method for reducing the power wastage. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 277, 123823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Knowling, M.J.; White, J.T.; McDonald, G.W.; Kim, J.-H.; Moore, C.R.; Hemmings, B. Disentangling environmental and economic contributions to hydro-economic model output uncertainty: An example in the context of land-use change impact assessment. Environ. Model. Softw. 2020, 127, 104653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Xie, Z.; Hu, Q.; Hao, L. Groundwater Pollution Control and Groundwater Management. Water 2024, 16, 3542. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16233542

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Xie Z, Hu Q, Hao L. Groundwater Pollution Control and Groundwater Management. Water. 2024; 16(23):3542. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16233542

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yunhui, Zhan Xie, Qili Hu, and Liting Hao. 2024. "Groundwater Pollution Control and Groundwater Management" Water 16, no. 23: 3542. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16233542

APA Style

Zhang, Y., Xie, Z., Hu, Q., & Hao, L. (2024). Groundwater Pollution Control and Groundwater Management. Water, 16(23), 3542. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16233542

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop