Next Article in Journal
Revealing Public Perceptions of Biodiverse vs. Turf Swales: Balancing Enhanced Ecosystem Services with Heightened Concerns
Previous Article in Journal
A Kinetic Study on Chronic Response of Activated Sludge to Diclofenac by Respirometry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Activity Concentration of Natural Radionuclides in Surface Sediments of Major River Watersheds in Korea and Assessment of Radiological Hazards

1
Yeongsan River Environment Research Center, National Institute of Environmental Research, Gwangju 61011, Republic of Korea
2
Han River Environment Research Center, National Institute of Environmental Research, Yangpyeong, Gyeonggi-do 12585, Republic of Korea
3
Plant Resources and Environment Major, Faculty of Bioscience and Industry, College of Applied Life Science, Jeju National University, Jeju 63243, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Water 2024, 16(20), 2897; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16202897
Submission received: 18 September 2024 / Revised: 10 October 2024 / Accepted: 10 October 2024 / Published: 12 October 2024

Abstract

:
The assessment of potential radiation hazards in accumulated sediments in aquatic ecosystems is vital for the management and disposal of sediments. Furthermore, preemptive management of radionuclides in terrestrial ecosystems is critical for marine ecosystem conservation. We analyzed the activity concentrations of natural radionuclides (226Ra,232Th, 238U, and 40K) in the surface sediments of major river watersheds in Korea and evaluated the radiation hazards stemming from these activity concentrations. The mean activity concentrations of 226Ra and 238U were lower than the global average, whereas those of 232Th and 40K were higher. The mean values of radium equivalent activity, external hazard index, and internal hazard index calculated from these activity concentrations did not exceed the recommended maximum values. The mean values of absorbed gamma dose rate in air and annual outdoor effective dose rate (AEDRout) were higher than the global average by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) but remarkably lower than the recommended and background values by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and the Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety (KINS). The contribution of 40K and 232Th to the AEDRout mean value was predominant. In conclusion, the surface sediments of major river watersheds in Korea are associated with negligible radiation hazards. These findings provide fundamental data for the management and treatment of sediments in terrestrial and marine ecosystems.

1. Introduction

Sources of radiation exposure in the environment that affect human health include natural and artificial radionuclides, which occur naturally from cosmic rays and the earth’s crust, and anthropogenic sources such as nuclear tests and nuclear power plant accidents [1]. In particular, external exposure to radiation from natural radionuclides is the primary contributor to the average annual radiation dose received by humans, of which terrestrial gamma radiation accounts for 85% of the total annual average ionizing radiation [2]. In addition, continuous exposure to even low levels of terrestrial gamma radiation can adversely affect human health [3]. The major natural sources of terrestrial gamma radiation include 40K and radionuclides derived from the decay series of long-lived radionuclides, such as uranium (238U) and thorium (232Th) [1]. 238U and 232Th radionuclides undergo a very complex radioactive decay series to produce the inert gases radon (222Rn) and thoron (220Rn), which can negatively impact human health via the respiratory process and internal exposure [1,4,5].
Natural radionuclides are widely present in various environmental spheres such as the lithosphere, biosphere, and pedosphere [3,6,7,8,9] and are distributed at different concentration levels depending on various geologic and geographical factors [1,10,11]. Therefore, the activity concentrations and distribution of natural radionuclides in rocks or soils related to their crustal composition are globally inhomogeneous [12]. In addition, the activity concentrations of natural radionuclides in river, lake, and coastal sediments accumulated as a result of weathering and the erosion of these rocks or soils are known to vary [1,8,12,13,14]. Furthermore, certain building materials used in Egypt, such as bricks, gypsum, cement, and sand, contain high concentrations of natural radionuclides [15]. In particular, sediments not only provide useful information for assessing the sources and environmental behavior of radionuclides in aquatic environments, but also serve as a direct source of radiation exposure to benthic organisms [8,12,16,17]. Furthermore, river and lake sediments comprise sand and gravel of various grain sizes, which are often utilized as construction materials [3,15,17,18,19]. Therefore, an understanding of the natural radionuclides in aquatic ecosystems is crucial for determining the background radiation levels to assess the radiation exposure effects in humans [20,21]. Furthermore, sediments contaminated by various factors are dredged and disposed of on land where they are either left untreated or utilized for other purposes such as construction materials [22,23,24]. These dredged sediments produce ionizing radiation, rendering the assessment of their potential as a radiation hazard for proper management and disposal imperative [24,25]. Therefore, the assessment of radiation hazard from natural radionuclides in sediments present in various environments such as rivers, lakes, and oceans has been performed by numerous researchers worldwide [7,8,12,17,19,23,24,26,27,28,29,30,31,32].
A national sediment monitoring network, operational in Korea since 2012, evaluates sediment quality in the aquatic environment according to the water environment information system (http://water.nier.go.kr) [33]. However, the monitoring network has only focused on assessing the temporal changes and contamination levels of nutrients, organic matter, and heavy metals; information on natural radionuclides is not available. Furthermore, studies examining natural radionuclides in sediments in Korea have been conducted only in a limited number of rivers, and no integrated study of major river watersheds has been attempted. River sediments containing natural radionuclides can eventually flow into coastal environments, affecting not only the coastal ecosystems but also humans engaged in marine activities. Therefore, preemptive management is essential.
This study aimed to investigate the distribution of the activity concentration of natural radionuclides (226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K) in surface sediments of major river watersheds in Korea. The objective was to evaluate the radiation hazard based on the concentrations of these radionuclides to provide fundamental data for the proper management and disposal of sediments containing natural radionuclides.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

According to the water environment information system of the Ministry of Environment, Korea’s major watersheds are divided based on five major rivers: Han River (HR), Geum River (GR), Nakdong River (NR), Yeongsan River (YR), and Seomjin River (SR) (http://water.nier.go.kr) [33]. These rivers eventually flow to the western and southern coasts of Korea. The average annual precipitation of each watershed is 1360 mm, 1258 mm, 1337 mm, and 1392 mm for HR, GR, NR, and Y-SR, respectively, with the GR watershed receiving the least amount of precipitation [34]. The region is characterized by a monsoon climate with more than 70% of annual precipitation recorded in summer. The area of each watershed is HR 41,957 km2, NR 23,690 km2, GR 9912 km2, SR 4914 km2, and YR 3371 km2. In this study, the survey sites were categorized into HR, GR, NR, YR, and SR, and a total of 58 sites including 15 sites in HR (H1–H15), 13 sites in GR (G1–G13), 16 sites in NR (N1–N16), 9 sites in YR (Y1–Y9), and 5 sites in SR (S1–S5) were selected from the national sediment monitoring network operating in these watersheds (Figure 1).

2.2. Sampling and Pretreatment

Surface sediment samples were mixed after consistently securing five or more surface layers using a Ponar grab and a scoop. The mixed samples were homogenized to be considered as representative samples of each site. The collected surface sediment samples were air-dried after removing impurities, passed through a 2 mm sieve, dried at 105 °C, and then ground into a very fine powder. The ground samples were placed into measuring sample containers (50 mm wide and 70 mm high) and sealed completely with a glue gun to prevent the loss of radon gas. The samples were then stored for approximately one month until secular equilibrium was reached between 226Ra and 232Th and their daughter radionuclides [35,36,37].

2.3. Measurement of Radionuclides

The analysis of natural radionuclides was performed using a gamma spectrometer consisting of a high-purity germanium detector (GEM-MX7080P4, Ortec, USA) and a multichannel analyzer (DSPEC-50, Ortec), which was used to analyze radiation equilibrium surface sediment samples and background activity for 80,000 s per sample. Background activity was examined via routine measurements once a week. The high-purity germanium detector of the gamma spectrometer had a relative efficiency of 66% at 60Co (1332 keV), an energy resolution of 1.9 keV, and a peak/Compton ratio of 75:1. The measured spectra were analyzed with an analytical program (Gamma Vision, Ortec) for daughter radionuclides of the 226Ra (214Pb, 352.0 keV; 214Bi, 609.3 keV), 232Th (212Pb, 238.6 keV; 228Ac, 911.2 keV), and 238U (234Th, 63.3 keV) families and a gamma ray energy of 40K (1460.8 keV) [36,37]. The activity concentrations of 226Ra and 232Th were obtained by averaging the measured concentrations of each daughter radionuclide. All surface sediment samples were corrected to exclude background activity and account for radioactive decay depending on the date of collection and measurement time before calculating the activity concentrations. The minimum detectable activity (MDA) of the gamma spectrometer at the 95% confidence level for natural radionuclides was calculated as follows [36]:
MDA   ( Bq   kg 1 ) = 4.66   ×   B T   ×   γ   ×   ε   ×   ω
where B is the background counts, T is the counting time (s), γ is the gamma emission probability, ε is the absolute efficiency of the detector, and ω is the sample weight (kg). The MDA values of the 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K radionuclides were 0.465 Bq kg−1, 0.435 Bq kg−1, 2.34 Bq kg−1, and 2.64 Bq kg−1, respectively.
The standard samples used for the energy and efficiency calibration of the gamma spectrometer were obtained from the Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS), which provided volumetric liners containing several gamma radionuclides (241Am, 109Cd, 57Co, 139Ce, 51Cr, 113Sn, 85Sr, 137Cs, 88Y, and 60Co). Standard volumetric sources were assessed for 30,000 s, and energy corrections and measurement efficiencies were calculated with an analytical program (Gamma Vision, Ortec). Quality control of the natural radionuclides analyzed by gamma spectrometry was performed using the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standard reference material (SRM 4353A) for Rocky Flats soil, which was assessed under the same conditions as those employed for the surface sediment samples to validate the reliability of the assessments. The activity concentrations of the natural radionuclides analyzed in the SRM soil were in good agreement with the NIST reference values, as follows: 40.2 ± 1.6 Bq kg−1 at 214Bi (NIST value 40.6 Bq kg−1), 46.9 ± 1.6 Bq kg−1 at 214Pb (NIST value 43.2 Bq kg−1), 46.3 ± 7.1 Bq kg−1 at 226Ra (NIST value 42.4 Bq kg−1), and 590 ± 13 Bq kg−1 at 40K (NIST value 589 Bq kg−1).

2.4. Assessment of Radiological Hazards

The assessment of radiation hazard for humans from 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K radionuclides in the sediments was estimated based on the five most widely used indices (Radium Equivalent Activity, Raeq; External Hazard Index, Hex; Internal Hazard Index, Hin; Absorbed Gamma Dose Rate in Air, AGDR; and Annual Outdoor Effective Dose Rate, AEDRout).
Raeq was defined as the radiation estimate that yields the same gamma ray dose rate as radium and is assumed to be the same if 226Ra,232Th, and 40K activity concentrations are 370 Bq kg−1, 259 Bq kg−1, and 4810 Bq kg−1, respectively. 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K are conveniently used for the comparative assessment of external radiation exposure in sediments with inhomogeneously distributed activity concentration. The following equation [1,38] was used for the assessments:
Raeq (Bq kg−1) = CRa + 1.43CTh + 0.077CK
where CRa, CTh, and CK represent the measured 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K activity concentrations (Bq kg−1), respectively, and the acceptable limit for the Raeq values in surface sediments containing them was 370 Bq kg−1.
Hex is used to assess the hazard of natural gamma radiation. Its use is proposed to restrict the allowable dose equivalent for the public to 1 mSv y−1 [39]. A value of Hex less than 1 is considered to reflect a minor radiation hazard. It was calculated via the following equation [1,38]:
Hex = CRa/370 + CTh/259 + Ck/4810
where CRa, CTh, and CK represent the measured 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K activity concentrations (Bq kg−1), respectively.
Hin refers to internal exposure to radon and its decay products and is used to assess the radiological hazard stemming from the inhalation of the short-lived radionuclides radon (222Rn) and thoron (220Rn). If the value of Hin is lower than 1, the radiation hazard is considered minor. It was calculated via the following equation [1,38]:
Hin = CRa/185 + CTh/259 + Ck/4810
where CRa, CTh, and CK represent the measured 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K activity concentrations (Bq kg−1), respectively.
AGDR is characterized as the external exposure to gamma radiation from terrestrial radionuclides at a height of 1 m above the earth’s surface, with 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K being the highest contributors due to their close relationship with activity concentrations [8,40]. AGDR was used to derive conversion factors from the 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K activity concentrations (0.462 nGy h−1 per Bq kg−1 for 226Ra, 0.604 nGy h−1 per Bq kg−1 for 232Th, and 0.0417 nGy h−1 per Bq kg−1 for 40K), assuming that the 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K radionuclides were uniformly distributed, and the 238U and 232Th decay series were in secular equilibrium, as shown in the following equation [1]:
AGDR (nGy h−1) = 0.462CRa + 0.604CTh + 0.0417CK
where CRa, CTh, and CK represent the measured activity concentrations (Bq kg−1) of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K, respectively.
As per the recommendation of the ICRP, the AEDRout should be used in the units of the dose equivalent (Sv) to optimize protection from radiation exposure [39]. Therefore, a conversion coefficient (0.7) and an outdoor occupancy factor (0.2) based on the absorbed gamma dose rate in the air should be applied. It was calculated using the following equation [1]:
AEDRout (µSv y−1) = AGDR (nGy h−1) × 8760 (h y−1) × 0.7 (Sv Gy−1) × 0.2 × 10−3

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Activity Concentration of 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K

The activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K radionuclides in surface sediments collected from major river watersheds in South Korea are shown in Table 1.
The mean activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K radionuclides in the surface sediments of all watersheds were 31.0 Bq kg−1, 58.1 Bq kg−1, 26.8 Bq kg−1, and 911 Bq kg−1, respectively, in the order of 40K > 232Th > 226Ra > 238U. The mean activity concentrations of these radionuclides across the watersheds were also consistent with the overall trend of 40K > 232Th > 226Ra > 238U, with the 40K radionuclide being the most dominant. These results are consistent with the natural radionuclide concentrations in sediments from the east coast of India and the Yangtze estuary in China (40K > 232Th > 238U) [8,19]. In general, potassium is the most abundant element in the earth’s crust compared to thorium and uranium. Thorium is insoluble and accumulates in particles relatively better than uranium [8,41,42]. The mean activity concentrations of these radionuclides in the major river watersheds were as follows: 28.2 Bq kg−1, 60.9 Bq kg−1, 22.4 Bq kg−1, and 989 Bq kg−1 for HR; 33.8 Bq kg−1, 65.6 Bq kg−1, 30.4 Bq kg−1, and 1016 Bq kg−1 for GR; 24.2 Bq kg−1, 45.3 Bq kg−1, 19.7 Bq kg−1, and 858 Bq kg−1 for NR; 40.3 Bq kg−1, 62.1 Bq kg−1, 36.5 Bq kg−1, and 763 Bq kg−1 for YR; and 37.1 Bq kg−1, 64.3 Bq kg−1, 35.2 Bq kg−1, and 837 Bq kg−1 for SR. 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K exhibited the mean activity concentrations in the following order: YR ≈ SR ≈ GR > HR > NR, GR ≈ SR ≈ YR ≈ HR > NR, YR ≈ SR > GR > HR > NR, and GR ≈ HR > NR ≈ SR ≈ YR, respectively. The mean activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 238U tended to be lower in the HR and NR watersheds, whereas that of 40K mean tended to be lower in the SR and YR watersheds.
A comparison with studies from other countries was conducted to validate the levels of 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K radionuclide activity concentrations investigated in this study. The results are presented in Table 2. The activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K radionuclides reported in different countries varied in the range of 12.7–52.0 Bq kg−1, 11.8–76.2 Bq kg−1, 7.31–60.2 Bq kg−1, and 208–1023 Bq kg−1, respectively. The results of this study are within the range of these activity concentrations observed in different countries. Furthermore, compared with the global average values, low levels of the 226Ra and 238U radionuclides and high levels of the 232Th and 40K radionuclides were observed here. In particular, the 40K radionuclide activity in this study was notably higher than the levels found in many countries (except for a few countries) and more than twice as high as the global average. These 40K radionuclide activity concentrations are consistent with those found in Korean soils, which supports the high levels observed [35,43]. Furthermore, these levels are also closely related to the geological characteristics of Korea, which is dominated by granite distribution [44].

3.2. Spatial and Frequency Distribution of 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K

The spatial and frequency distributions of 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K radionuclides in the surface sediments collected from major river watersheds in Korea are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3.
According to the spatial distribution of 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K radionuclides (Figure 2), the highest activity concentrations of these radionuclides were as follows: 65.4 Bq kg−1 at site H4 in the HR watershed, 112 Bq kg−1 at site N5 in the NR watershed, 76.4 Bq kg−1 at site S3 in the SR watershed, and 1319 Bq kg−1 at site H9 in the HR watershed. In contrast, the lowest activity concentrations of these radionuclides were recorded as follows: 8.73 Bq kg−1 at site H3 in the HR watershed, 16.0 Bq kg−1 at site N10 in the NR watershed, below the minimum detectable activity at sites N14 and N16 in the NR watershed, and 581 Bq kg−1 at site Y3 in the YR watershed. Based on the calculated skewness (226Ra, 0.72; 232Th, 0.44; 238U, 0.92; 40K, 0.43) and kurtosis (226Ra, −0.14; 232Th, −0.44; 238U, 2.01; 40K, 1.38) values, the activity concentrations of these radionuclides generally showed an asymmetric and peaked distribution, but with a high-frequency distribution centered around the mean value (Figure 3).
The 226Ra, 232Th, and 238U radionuclides all showed highly correlated spatial distributions, whereas the 40K radionuclide showed no association with these radionuclides (Figure 2). The correlation between the radionuclides presented in Figure 4 also reflected a trend consistent with their spatial distribution. The correlation coefficients (r) were 0.887 (p < 0.01) for 232Th–226Ra, 0.838 (p < 0.01) for 238U–232Th, and 0.928 (p < 0.01) for 238U–226Ra. These relationships have been reported to be closely related to the geologic characteristics of the study area [8,46,47,48].

3.3. Assessment of Radiological Hazards

The radiation hazards according to five indices (Raeq, Hex, Hin, AGDR, and AEDRout) were calculated based on the activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K radionuclides in the surface sediments collected from major river watersheds in Korea. The results are presented in Table 3.
The mean concentrations of Raeq in the HR, GR, NR, YR, and SR watersheds were 191 Bq kg−1, 206 Bq kg−1, 155 Bq kg−1, 188 Bq kg−1, and 194 Bq kg−1, respectively. The corresponding Hex values were 0.517, 0.556, 0.419, 0.507, and 0.523, the Hin values were 0.593, 0.647, 0.484, 0.616, and 0.623, the AGDR values were 91.0 nGy h−1, 97.6 nGy h−1, 74.3 nGy h−1, 87.9 nGy h−1, and 90.9 nGy h−1, and the AEDRout values were 112 µSv y−1, 120 µSv y−1, 91.2 µSv y−1, 108 µSv y−1, and 111 µSv y−1, respectively. The values of all five indices were highest in the GR watershed and lowest in the NR watershed. Their mean values for all sites in the five major river watersheds were evaluated as 184 Bq kg−1, 0.498, 0.581, 87.4 nGy h−1, and 107 µSv y−1, respectively.
The mean value of Raeq obtained in this study is lower than the recommended maximum value (370 Bq kg−1), and the mean values of Hex and Hin also do not exceed the recommended value (1), indicating that the radiation hazard was negligible [1,38]. The AGDR mean value of 87.4 nGy h−1 is approximately 1.5-fold higher than the global mean value presented by the UNSCEAR (59 nGy h−1) [1]. However, these values are within the range of background values measured by a high-pressure ionization chamber on land in Korea (23–148 nGy h−1) [44] and those investigated in river or lake sediments in several countries [7,12,18,19,26,28,30,31]. The mean value of AEDRout calculated based on AGDR is 107 µSv y−1, which is approximately 1.5-fold higher (70 µSv y−1) than the global mean value reported by the UNSCEAR [1]; however, the value is within the range of values reported from different countries [12,18,19,26,28,30]. Nevertheless, the values reported in this study are remarkably lower than those recommended by the ICRP (1000 µSv y−1) and the background values measured by a high-pressure ionization chamber at the Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety (KINS) (438–2628 µSv y−1), indicating a negligible radiation hazard [39,49].
When the contribution of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K radionuclides to the mean value of AEDRout was evaluated (Figure 5), we found that the contribution to the total watershed was dominated by 40K radionuclides, in the following order 40K (45%) > 232Th (38%) > 226Ra (17%). In general, the 238U and 232Th series and the 40K radionuclides had a high contribution to the AEDRout value [1], which is consistent with the results of many studies conducted on soils [36,50,51,52,53]. The contribution of these radionuclides by major river watershed was as follows: 40K (48%) > 232Th (39%) > 226Ra (13%) for HR; 40K (44%) > 232Th (40%) > 226Ra (16%) for GR; 40K (56%) > 232Th (30%) > 226Ra (14%) for NR; 232Th (42%) > 40K (38%) > 226Ra (20%) for YR; and 40K (42%) > 232Th (40%) > 226Ra (18%) for SR. Although the overall radionuclide contributions were consistent among all watersheds, the contribution of 40K radionuclides was higher in the NR than in the other watersheds, and the contribution of 232Th radionuclides was the highest in the YR watershed. Overall, the contribution to the AEDRout value was dominated by the 40K and 232Th radionuclides. These results tend to be consistent with those obtained in previous studies, which are as follows: China Wei River, 40K (50%) > 232Th (33%) > 226Ra (17%); and India Bharathapuzha River, 232Th (49%) > 40K (28%) > 226Ra (23%) [12,18]. Notably, the sediments from streams and rivers around Kanyakumari, India, where background radiation is high, indicated a very high contribution of 232Th radionuclides, up to approximately 87% [25]. The differences in the contribution of these radionuclides to the AEDRout depend on the activity concentrations in the study area, and the activity concentrations of these radionuclides are closely related to geologic characteristics. Future studies should aim to understand the geology around the watersheds to clearly evaluate the differences in the contribution of these radionuclides.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we determined, for the first time, the activity concentrations of 226Ra,232Th, 238U, and 40K radionuclides in the surface sediments of major river watersheds in Korea and evaluated the radiation hazards stemming from these radionuclide activity concentrations. The mean activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K radionuclides in surface sediments of all watersheds were 31.0 Bq kg−1, 58.1 Bq kg−1, 26.8 Bq kg−1, and 911 Bq kg−1, respectively. Spatially, the mean activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 238U radionuclides tended to be higher in the HR and NR watersheds, and the mean activity concentration of 40K radionuclides tended to be lower in the SR and YR watersheds. The activity concentration levels of these radionuclides showed low levels of 226Ra and 238U and high levels of 232Th and 40K compared to the global average. In particular, the 40K radionuclide activity concentration levels were not only higher than the levels presented in many countries but also more than twice as high as the global average. The 226Ra, 232Th, and 238U radionuclides showed a highly correlated spatial distribution, whereas the 40K radionuclide did not show any association with these radionuclides. The activity concentrations of these radionuclides showed a high-frequency distribution centered around the mean value, although they generally showed an asymmetric and peaked distribution.
In the assessment of radiation hazards (Raeq, Hex, Hin, AGDR, and AEDRout) by major river watersheds, the mean values for Raeq, Hex, and Hin did not exceed the recommended values presented by the UNSCEAR, indicating a negligible radiation hazard. The mean values of AGDR and AEDRout were approximately 1.5-fold higher than the global mean values presented by the UNSCEAR. However, these values were remarkably lower than the ICRP-recommended values and the Korean background values, indicating negligible radiation hazards. In contrast, the contributions of the 226Ra,232Th, and 40K radionuclides to the AEDRout mean values were predominantly influenced by the 40K radionuclide, in the order of 40K (45%) > 232Th (38%) > 226Ra (17%), across all watersheds, and the contributions of these radionuclides by watersheds were also consistent with the results for the whole watersheds. However, the contribution of the 40K radionuclide was relatively higher in the NR watershed than in other watersheds, and the contribution of the 232Th radionuclide was the highest in the YR watershed. Overall, the contribution to the AEDRout value was dominated by the 40K and 232Th radionuclides.
In conclusion, the 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K radionuclides in surface sediments of major Korean river watersheds showed various concentration distributions, indicating that the radiation hazard from sediments is negligible. Therefore, the results obtained in this study can be used as an important resource for the proper management and treatment of accumulated sediments in various ecosystems, such as terrestrial and marine, in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.-W.K., M.A., T.K. and W.-P.P.; methodology, T.-W.K., M.A. and T.K.; validation, T.-W.K., M.A. and Y.-U.H.; formal analysis, T.-W.K., M.A. and Y.-U.H.; investigation, T.-W.K., M.A. and Y.-U.H.; data curation, T.-W.K., Y.-U.H. and H.J.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, T.-W.K. and M.A.; writing—review and editing, T.-W.K., M.A., T.K., W.-S.L. and W.-P.P.; visualization, T.-W.K., H.J.Y. and S.J., T.-W.K. and M.A. contributed equally. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), funded by the Ministry of Environment (MOE) of the Republic of Korea (grant No. NIER-2015-01-01-032 and NIER-2016-01-01-072).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the members of the National Radioactivity Monitoring Network at the National Institute of Environmental Research for their assistance with sampling and analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation). Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation; UNSCEAR: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  2. UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation). Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation; UNSCEAR: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  3. Xinwei, L.; Xiaolan, Z. Measurement of natural radioactivity in sand samples collected from the Baoji Weihe Sands Park, China. Environ. Geol. 2006, 50, 977–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ngachin, M.; Garavaglia, M.; Giovani, C.; Kwato Njock, M.G.; Nourreddine, A. Assessment of natural radioactivity and associated radiation hazards in some Cameroonian building materials. Radiat. Meas. 2007, 42, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Savidou, A.; Raptis, C.; Kritidis, P. Study of natural radionuclides and radon emanation in bricks used in the Attica region, Greece. J. Environ. Radioact. 1996, 31, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Abbady, A.; Ahmed, N.K.; Elarabi, A.M.; Michel, R.; Elkamel, A.H.; Abbady, A.G.E. Estimation of radiation hazard indices from natural radioactivity of some rocks. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 2006, 17, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qureshi, A.A.; Tariq, S.; Din, K.U.; Manzoor, S.; Calligaris, C.; Waheed, A. Evaluation of excessive lifetime cancer risk due to natural radioactivity in the rivers sediments of Northern Pakistan. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2014, 7, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ravisankar, R.; Chandramohan, J.; Chandrasekaran, A.; Prince Prakash Jebakumar, J.P.P.; Vijayalakshmi, I.; Vijayagopal, P.; Venkatraman, B. Assessments of radioactivity concentration of natural radionuclides and radiological hazard indices in sediment samples from the East Coast of TamilNadu, India with statistical approach. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015, 97, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yasmin, S.; Barua, B.S.; Kamal, M.; Rashid, M.A. An analysis for distribution of natural radionuclides in soil, sand and sediment of Potenga Sea Beach area of Chittagong, Bangladesh. J. Environ. Prot. 2014, 05, 1553–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Baldık, R.; Aytekin, H.; Erer, M. Radioactivity measurements and radiation dose assessments due to natural radiation in Karabük (Turkey). J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2011, 289, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Patra, A.C.; Sahoo, S.K.; Tripathi, R.M.; Puranik, V.D. Distribution of radionuclides in surface soils, Singhbhum shear Zone, India and associated dose. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2013, 185, 7833–7843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lu, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, F. Natural radioactivity in sediment of Wei River, China. Environ. Geol. 2008, 53, 1475–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kobya, Y.; Taşkın, H.; Yeşilkanat, C.M.; Varinlioğlu, A.; Korcak, S. Natural and artificial radioactivity assessment of dam lakes sediments in Çoruh River, Turkey. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2015, 303, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Krmar, M.; Varga, E.; Slivka, J. Correlations of natural radionuclides in soil with those in sediment from the Danube and nearby irrigation channels. J. Environ. Radioact. 2013, 117, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Turtiainen, T.; Salahel-din, K.; Klemola, S.; Sihvonen, A.P. Collective effective dose received by the population of Egypt from building materials. J. Radiol. Prot. 2008, 28, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huang, D.; Du, J.; Deng, B.; Zhang, J. Distribution patterns of particle-reactive radionuclides in sediments off eastern Hainan Island, China: Implications for source and transport pathways. Contin. Shelf Res. 2013, 57, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Isinkaye, M.O.; Emelue, H.U. Natural radioactivity measurements and evaluation of radiological hazards in sediment of Oguta Lake, South East Nigeria. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2015, 8, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Krishnamoorthy, N.; Mullainathan, S.; Mehra, R.; Chaparro, M.A.E.; Chaparro, M.A.E. Radiation impact assessment of naturally occurring radionuclides and magnetic mineral studies of Bharathapuzha River sediments, South India. Environ. Earth Sci. 2014, 71, 3593–3604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, J.; Du, J.; Bi, Q. Natural radioactivity assessment of surface sediments in the Yangtze estuary. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 114, 602–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chiozzi, P.; Pasquale, V.; Verdoya, M. Naturally occurring radioactivity at the alps–Apennines transition. Radiat. Meas. 2002, 35, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. El-Bahi, S.M. Assessment of radioactivity and radon exhalation rate in Egyptian cement. Health Phys. 2004, 86, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abdellah, W.M.; Diab, H.M.; El-Kameesy, S.U.; Salama, E.; El-Framawy, S. Natural radioactivity levels and associated health hazards from the terrestrial ecosystem in Rosetta branch of the River Nile, Egypt. Isot. Environ. Health Stud. 2017, 53, 427–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Aggrey, Y.A.; Amo-Boateng, M.; Kpeglo, D.O.; Dubinsky, M.; Tengey, I. Evaluation of natural radioactivity levels and related radiological hazards in marine sediment samples taken from Ahanta west in the Gulf of Guinea, Ghana. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2024, 333, 2281–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Botwe, B.O.; Schirone, A.; Delbono, I.; Barsanti, M.; Delfanti, R.; Kelderman, P.; Nyarko, E.; Lens, P.N.L. Radioactivity concentrations and their radiological significance in sediments of the Tema harbour (Greater Accra, Ghana). J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2017, 10, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Natarajan, T.; Sahoo, S.K.; Inoue, K.; Arae, H.; Aono, T.; Fukushi, M. Natural radionuclides and radiological risk assessment in the stream and river sediments of a high background natural radiation area Kanyakumari, India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2024, 196, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bouhila, G.; Azbouche, A.; Benrachi, F.; Belamri, M. Natural radioactivity levels and evaluation of radiological hazards from Beni Haroun Dam sediment samples, Northeast Algeria. Environ. Earth Sci. 2017, 76, 710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chowdhury, M.I.; Alam, M.N.; Hazari, S.K.S. Distribution of radionuclides in the river sediments and coastal soils of Chittagong, Bangladesh and evaluation of the radiation hazard. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1999, 51, 747–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kurnaz, A.; Küçükömeroğlu, B.; Keser, R.; Okumusoglu, N.T.; Korkmaz, F.; Karahan, G.; Çevik, U. Determination of radioactivity levels and hazards of soil and sediment samples in Fırtına Valley (Rize, Turkey). Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2007, 65, 1281–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Powell, B.A.; Hughes, L.D.; Soreefan, A.M.; Falta, D.; Wall, M.; DeVol, T.A. Elevated concentrations of primordial radionuclides in sediments from the reedy river and surrounding creeks in Simpsonville, South Carolina. J. Environ. Radioact. 2007, 94, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Santawamaitre, T.; Malain, D.; Al-Sulaiti, H.A.; Matthews, M.; Bradley, D.A.; Regan, P.H. Study of natural radioactivity in riverbank soils along the Chao Phraya River Basin in Thailand. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2011, 652, 920–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Suresh, G.; Ramasamy, V.; Meenakshisundaram, V.; Venkatachalapathy, R.; Ponnusamy, V. A relationship between the natural radioactivity and mineralogical composition of the Ponnaiyar River sediments, India. J. Environ. Radioact. 2011, 102, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Uosif, M.A.M. Gamma-ray spectroscopic analysis of selected samples from Nile River sediments in upper Egypt. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2007, 123, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. MOE (Ministry of the Environment). Water Environment Information System. Available online: https://water.nier.go.kr (accessed on 20 August 2024). (In Korean).
  34. KMA (Korea Meteorological Administration). Available online: https://www.kma.go.kr (accessed on 30 July 2024). (In Korean).
  35. Kang, T.W.; Park, W.P.; Han, Y.U.; Bong, K.M.; Kim, K.H. Natural and artificial radioactivity in volcanic ash soils of Jeju island, Republic of Korea, and assessment of the radiation hazards: Importance of soil properties. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2020, 323, 1113–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Karataşlı, M.; Turhan, Ş.; Varinlioğlu, A.; Yeğingil, Z. Natural and fallout radioactivity levels and radiation hazard evaluation in soil samples. Environ. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sanusi, M.S.M.; Ramli, A.T.; Wagiran, H.; Lee, M.H.; Heryanshah, A.; Said, M.N. Investigation of geological and soil influence on natural gamma radiation exposure and assessment of radiation hazards in western region, peninsular Malaysia. Environ. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Beretka, J.; Matthew, P.J. Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials, industrial wastes and by-products. Health Phys. 1985, 48, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection). Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection; ICRP Publication 60, Ann. ICRP; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1990; Volume 21. [Google Scholar]
  40. Karahan, G.; Bayulken, A. Assessment of gamma dose rates around Istanbul (Turkey). J. Environ. Radioact. 2000, 47, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Radi Dar, M.A.; El-Saharty, A.A. Some radioactive-elements in the coastal sediments of the Mediterranean Sea. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2013, 153, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ramasamy, V.; Suresh, G.; Meenakshisundaram, V.; Ponnusamy, V. Horizontal and vertical characterization of radionuclides and minerals in river sediments. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2011, 69, 184–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yun, J.Y.; Choi, S.W.; Kim, C.K.; Moon, J.Y.; Rho, B.H. Distribution and characteristics of radioactivity (232Th, 226Ra, 40K, 137Cs and 90Sr) and radiation in Korea. J. Radiat. Prot. Res. 2005, 30, 167–174. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hassan, N.M.; Kim, Y.J.; Jang, J.; Chang, B.U.; Chae, J.S. Comparative study of precise measurements of natural radionuclides and radiation dose using in-situ and laboratory γ-ray spectroscopy techniques. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jibiri, N.N.; Okeyode, I.C. Evaluation of radiological hazards in the sediments of Ogun River, South-Western Nigeria. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2012, 81, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Agbalagba, E.O.; Onoja, R.A. Evaluation of natural radioactivity in soil, sediment and water samples of Niger Delta (Biseni) flood plain lakes, Nigeria. J. Environ. Radioact. 2011, 102, 667–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Li, H.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, C.; Su, W.; Ma, Y.; Zhong, Q.; Xiao, E.; Xia, F.; Zheng, G.; Xiao, T. Geochemical distribution and environmental risks of radionuclides in soils and sediments runoff of a uranium mining area in South China. Toxics 2024, 12, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Selçuk Zorer, Ö.S. Evaluations of environmental hazard parameters of natural and some artificial radionuclides in river water and sediments. Microchem. J. 2019, 145, 762–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety (KINS). Integrated Environmental Radiation Monitoring Network. Available online: https://iernet.kins.re.kr (accessed on 30 July 2024).
  50. Agbalagba, E.O.; Avwiri, G.O.; Chad-Umoreh, Y.E. γ-Spectroscopy Measurement of Natural Radioactivity and Assessment of Radiation Hazard Indices in Soil Samples from Oil Fields Environment of Delta State, Nigeria. J. Environ. Radioact. 2012, 109, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Bara, S.V.; Arora, V.; Chinnaesakki, S.; Sartandel, S.J.; Bajwa, B.S.; Tripathi, R.M.; Puranik, V.D. Radiological assessment of natural and fallout radioactivity in the soil of Chamba and Dharamshala areas of Himachal Pradesh, India. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2012, 291, 769–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Öztürk, B.C.; Çam, N.F.; Yaprak, G. Reference levels of natural radioactivity and 137Cs in and around the surface soils of Kestanbol pluton in e-zine region of Çanakkale Province, Turkey. J. Environ. Sci. Health A Tox. Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2013, 48, 1522–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Saleh, I.H. Depleted uranium residues, NORMs and 137Cs in the coastal zone soil of Musandam peninsula, Hurmuz Strait region, Sultanate of Oman. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2018, 11, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map showing the sampling sites for measurements of natural radionuclides in surface sediments of major river (Han River, H1–H15; Geum River, G1–G13; Nakdong River, N1–N16; Yeongsan River, Y1–Y9; Seomjin River, S1–S5) watersheds in Korea. Black and blue lines indicate watersheds and streams, respectively.
Figure 1. Map showing the sampling sites for measurements of natural radionuclides in surface sediments of major river (Han River, H1–H15; Geum River, G1–G13; Nakdong River, N1–N16; Yeongsan River, Y1–Y9; Seomjin River, S1–S5) watersheds in Korea. Black and blue lines indicate watersheds and streams, respectively.
Water 16 02897 g001
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K activity concentrations in surface sediments collected from major river watersheds in Korea (HR, Han River; GR, Geum River; NR, Nakdong River; YR, Yeongsan River; SR, Seomjin River). The inserted rectangular box represents the HR watershed.
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K activity concentrations in surface sediments collected from major river watersheds in Korea (HR, Han River; GR, Geum River; NR, Nakdong River; YR, Yeongsan River; SR, Seomjin River). The inserted rectangular box represents the HR watershed.
Water 16 02897 g002
Figure 3. Frequency distribution histograms of 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K activity concentrations in surface sediments collected from major river watersheds in Korea.
Figure 3. Frequency distribution histograms of 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K activity concentrations in surface sediments collected from major river watersheds in Korea.
Water 16 02897 g003
Figure 4. Correlation between 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K activity concentrations in surface sediments collected from major river watersheds in Korea ((a): 232Th–226Ra, (b): 238U–232Th, (c): 238U–226Ra, (d): 40K–232Th, (e): 40K–226Ra, (f): 238U–40K). ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed test).
Figure 4. Correlation between 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K activity concentrations in surface sediments collected from major river watersheds in Korea ((a): 232Th–226Ra, (b): 238U–232Th, (c): 238U–226Ra, (d): 40K–232Th, (e): 40K–226Ra, (f): 238U–40K). ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed test).
Water 16 02897 g004
Figure 5. Contribution to the AEDRout values calculated from the activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in the surface sediments collected from major river watersheds in Korea (HR, Han River; GR, Geum River; NR, Nakdong River; YR, Yeongsan River; SR, Seomjin River).
Figure 5. Contribution to the AEDRout values calculated from the activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in the surface sediments collected from major river watersheds in Korea (HR, Han River; GR, Geum River; NR, Nakdong River; YR, Yeongsan River; SR, Seomjin River).
Water 16 02897 g005
Table 1. Activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K in surface sediments collected from major river watersheds in Korea.
Table 1. Activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K in surface sediments collected from major river watersheds in Korea.
Watershed226Ra
(Bq kg−1)
232Th
(Bq kg−1)
238U
(Bq kg−1)
40K
(Bq kg−1)
Han River
(n = 15)
28.2 ± 15.2
(8.73–65.4) a
60.9 ± 24.7
(23.6–103)
22.4 ± 11.4
(9.25–46.6)
989 ± 118
(881–1319)
Geum River
(n = 13)
33.8 ± 9.7
(23.6–58.0)
65.6 ± 20.2
(41.4–111)
30.4 ± 10.5
(19.8–59.1)
1016 ± 111
(870–1257)
Nakdong River
(n = 16)
24.2 ± 11.2
(11.3–46.7)
45.3 ± 25.3
(16.0–112)
19.7 ± 12.0
(<2.64 b–46.2)
858 ± 62
(763–1004)
Yeongsan River
(n = 9)
40.3 ± 15.3
(19.3–59.9)
62.1 ± 22.1
(36.4–93.1)
36.5 ± 9.9
(21.7–50.2)
763 ± 100
(581–915)
Seomjin River
(n = 5)
37.1 ± 19.5
(16.9–64.9)
64.3 ± 33.0
(29.4–104)
35.2 ± 24.3
(15.9–76.4)
837 ± 134
(608–959)
Total
(n = 58)
31.0 ± 14.2
(8.73–65.4)
58.1 ± 24.8
(16.0–112)
26.8 ± 13.8
(<2.64–76.4)
911 ± 136
(581–1319)
Notes: a Mean ± standard deviation (min–max), b less than minimum detectable activity.
Table 2. Comparison of activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K in surface sediments collected from major river watersheds in Korea and other countries in the world.
Table 2. Comparison of activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 40K in surface sediments collected from major river watersheds in Korea and other countries in the world.
CountryRiver/Lake/
Estuary
226Ra
(Bq kg−1)
232Th
(Bq kg−1)
238U
(Bq kg−1)
40K
(Bq kg−1)
Reference
AlgeriaBeni Haroun24.7 (9–66) a26.0 (14–37)- b208 (177–288)[26]
BangladeshKarnaphuli35.9 (18.4–85.2)65.5 (50.8–88.4)37.2 (20.0–89.7)272 (217–320)[27]
Shango27.8 (24.0–31.9)57.5 (52.4–61.7)25.4 (21.6–28.3)255 (212–292)[27]
ChinaWei21.8 (10.4–39.9)33.1 (15.3–54.8)-833 (515–1176)[12]
Yangtze24.3 (13.7–52.3)40.9 (26.1–71.9)32.8 (14.1–62.3)628 (392–898)[19]
EgyptNile52.076.2-352[32]
IndiaPonnaiyar-46.9 (<MDA c–106)7.31 (<MDA–11.6)384 (201–468)[31]
Bharathapuzha41.9 (21.2–66.0)54.9 (33.5–93.1)-478 (232–900)[18]
NigeriaOguta47.9 (7.23–135)55.4 (<MDA–140)-1023 (189–2401)[17]
Ogun12.7 (5.57–20.4)11.8 (5.04–23.1)-499 (371–608)[45]
PakistanGilgit & Indus50.7 (21.4–111)70.2 (11.7–172)-532 (174–825)[7]
ThailandChao Phraya-64.9 (60.7–69.1)60.2 (55.3–65.2)432 (393–478)[30]
TurkeyFırtına49.9 (15–167)38 (17–87)39 (16–113)573 (51–1605)[28]
Çoruh-18.3 (8.4–46.8)11.4 (<3.5 c–29.9)510 (129–969)[13]
USAReedy21.4 (11.4–41.2)45.3 (13.0–186)37.8 (11.1–74.2)609 (386–1047)[29]
Worldwide 40 (8–160)35 (4–130)35 (4–140)370 (100–700)[1]
Korea 31.0 (8.73–65.4)58.1 (16.0–112)26.8 (<2.64–76.4)911 (581–1319)This
study
Notes: a Mean (min–max), b No data, c less than minimum detectable activity (MDA).
Table 3. Radiological hazard indices calculated based on the activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in surface sediments collected from major river watersheds in Korea.
Table 3. Radiological hazard indices calculated based on the activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in surface sediments collected from major river watersheds in Korea.
WatershedRaeq a
(Bq kg−1)
Hex bHin cAGDR d
(nGy h−1)
AEDRout e
(µSv y−1)
Han River
(n = 15)
191 ± 48
(116–281) f
0.517 ± 0.130
(0.314–0.759)
0.593 ± 0.168
(0.337–0.936)
91.0 ± 20.9
(58.2–130)
112 ± 26
(71.4–159)
Geum River
(n = 13)
206 ± 36
(164–284)
0.556 ± 0.097
(0.444–0.766)
0.647 ± 0.119
(0.507–0.923)
97.6 ± 15.5
(79.0–130)
120 ± 19
(96.9–160)
Nakdong River
(n = 16)
155 ± 44
(100–266)
0.419 ± 0.119
(0.270–0.717)
0.484 ± 0.148
(0.304–0.844)
74.3 ± 18.7
(50.3–121)
91.2 ± 22.9
(61.7–148)
Yeongsan River
(n = 9)
188 ± 50
(122–253)
0.507 ± 0.136
(0.329–0.683)
0.616 ± 0.176
(0.390–0.845)
87.9 ± 22.3
(57.7–118)
108 ± 27
(70.8–144)
Seomjin River
(n = 5)
194 ± 62
(126–282)
0.523 ± 0.169
(0.340–0.762)
0.623 ± 0.221
(0.386–0.938)
90.9 ± 26.8
(61.8–130)
111 ± 33
(75.8–159)
Total
(n = 58)
184 ± 48
(99.8–284)
0.498 ± 0.131
(0.270–0.766)
0.581 ± 0.166
(0.304–0.938)
87.4 ± 21.1
(50.3–130)
107 ± 26
(61.7–160)
Notes: a Radium equivalent activity, b external hazard index, c Internal hazard index, d absorbed gamma dose rate in air, e annual effective dose rate outdoors, f mean (min–max).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kang, T.-W.; An, M.; Han, Y.-U.; Yang, H.J.; Kang, T.; Jung, S.; Lee, W.-S.; Park, W.-P. Activity Concentration of Natural Radionuclides in Surface Sediments of Major River Watersheds in Korea and Assessment of Radiological Hazards. Water 2024, 16, 2897. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16202897

AMA Style

Kang T-W, An M, Han Y-U, Yang HJ, Kang T, Jung S, Lee W-S, Park W-P. Activity Concentration of Natural Radionuclides in Surface Sediments of Major River Watersheds in Korea and Assessment of Radiological Hazards. Water. 2024; 16(20):2897. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16202897

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kang, Tae-Woo, Mijeong An, Young-Un Han, Hae Jong Yang, Taegu Kang, Soojung Jung, Won-Seok Lee, and Won-Pyo Park. 2024. "Activity Concentration of Natural Radionuclides in Surface Sediments of Major River Watersheds in Korea and Assessment of Radiological Hazards" Water 16, no. 20: 2897. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16202897

APA Style

Kang, T. -W., An, M., Han, Y. -U., Yang, H. J., Kang, T., Jung, S., Lee, W. -S., & Park, W. -P. (2024). Activity Concentration of Natural Radionuclides in Surface Sediments of Major River Watersheds in Korea and Assessment of Radiological Hazards. Water, 16(20), 2897. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16202897

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop