Next Article in Journal
Identification of Priority Pollutants in Groundwater: A Case Study in Xiong’an New Region, China
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrochemical Characteristics and Water Quality of Shallow Groundwater in Desert Area of Kunyu City, Southern Margin of Tarim Basin, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Integrated Use of Bioaccumulation, Genotoxic, and Haematological Endpoints to Assess the Effect of Water Remediation Strategies on Fish Health: A Complementary Study

1
CESAM—Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies & Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
2
Centre for Functional Ecology (CFE), TERRA Associate Laboratory, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456 Coimbra, Portugal
3
ECOMARE-Laboratory for Innovation and Sustainability of Marine Biological Resources, CESAM-Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Estrada do Porto de Pesca Costeira, 3830-565 Gafanha da Nazaré, Portugal
4
EPIUnit-Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas, 135, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal
5
Department of Environmental Health, Portuguese National Institute of Health, Rua Alexandre Herculano, 321, 4000-055 Porto, Portugal
6
Department of Chemistry, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
7
Department of Chemistry & LAQV, REQUIMTE, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
8
CIIMAR–Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal
9
Department of Chemistry & CICECO—Aveiro Institute of Materials, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2023, 15(8), 1564; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15081564
Submission received: 28 February 2023 / Revised: 5 April 2023 / Accepted: 14 April 2023 / Published: 17 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Water Quality and Contamination)

Abstract

:
Biosorption successfully remediates saline water contaminated with legacy contaminants, but its effects on the health of marine organisms remain unclear. Therefore, our aim was to address this knowledge gap with data on the accumulation ability, as well as the cytogenetic and biochemical effects in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). To this end, we exposed turbot for seven days to a mixture of remediated metals (Rem treatments: Cd, Hg, and Pb), with and without the presence of nanoparticles (NP), and compared them with the maximum allowable concentrations (MAC treatment) for effluent discharges. We determined the metal accumulation in the blood and kidney and evaluated haematological changes (red blood cell count, haemoglobin, and mean cell haemoglobin (MCH)) and genotoxicity (erythrocytic nuclear abnormalities assay) in the blood. The results showed that remediation with non-living macroalgae significantly reduced the metallic blood and kidney burdens in the Rem treatments. Furthermore, no genotoxic potential occurred in the Rem and MAC treatments in parallel with the reduction in MCH levels in the Rem treatments, which would reflect hematopoietic disturbances in the MAC. Our results validate biosorption remediation as we achieved a considerable reduction in metal loads while maintaining the health status of fish, highlighting the importance of testing water remediation methods in the biota.

1. Introduction

Presently, the world is facing a global water crisis [1], which is intensified by water contamination and the increase in extreme climatic events. As such, water security and access to clean water are key points of the EU Green Deal and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, starting with SDG6 to “Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all”. This global concern has led to the continuous search for the best technologies to treat contaminated water, protecting humans and aquatic organisms, and increasing water reuse.
(Bio)sorption is a remediation methodology that has attracted the attention of the scientific community, and numerous studies evaluating the sorption capability of (bio)sorbents for a wide range of water contaminants are readily available in the literature [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. However, most of these studies have several shortcomings, including the fact that the levels of contamination tested are usually unrealistically high. In most cases, contaminants have been studied and regulated separately on the basis of their individual toxicological profile, whereas both inorganic contaminants, recognized as legacy substances, and contaminants of emerging concern, namely engineered nanoparticles (NP), occur simultaneously in the environment. Generally, these studies only consider the final chemical status and rarely include a toxicological assessment of the water after the proposed treatment [7,9]. Depending on the functional groups and pore size, (bio)sorbents may display different affinities and selectivities for different contaminants, and the speciation of the latter in the reaction medium may influence their adsorption rate and toxicity [10,11].
Because of the global distribution of contaminants and the lack of information on their potential hazards, toxicological studies on combined exposures are even more important, as they may have additive, synergistic, or antagonistic effects [12]. Indeed, several studies have shown that exposure to multiple contaminants can have adverse effects on organisms [13,14]. However, few studies relate toxic effects and responses to mixtures of specific classes of contaminants, and the existent ones do it based on unrealistically high concentrations. In fact, the toxicity of mixtures within the legal thresholds for each contaminant is rarely assessed, reinforcing the importance of evaluating the effects of combined exposures to different contaminants within unhazardous limits and to predict their consequences to the environment, seafood, and human health [15].
Cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb) are known as the “toxic trio” due to their toxic properties [16]. The first two are listed as PBT substances (Persistence, Bioaccumulation potential, and Toxicity) and lead is listed as a priority substance in European legislation-Directive 2008/105/EC [17]. These elements reach the aquatic ecosystems through natural (mainly soil erosion and volcanic activity) and human sources [18], which include untreated or inadequately treated wastewaters and industrial effluents [19]. The adverse effects of these elements in aquatic ecosystems will depend on the composition and volume of the effluent discharged, and in extreme scenarios may include the death of aquatic life, algal blooms, habitat destruction, debris, increased water flow, and other short- and long-term toxicity [19]. As these metals are persistent, they easily bioaccumulate and biomagnify throughout food chains, inducing a wide range of adverse effects both on wildlife and human health [20,21,22,23,24,25,26].
Silver (Ag) and gold (Au) NP are among the most widely used nanoparticles (NP) and are listed as priority substances by the OECD [27]. Despite this, information regarding Ag and Au NP’s toxicity is still inconclusive. According to some studies, both NP can induce in vitro and in vivo toxic effects to humans and wildlife [23,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. Nevertheless, these NP have been used in nano-remediation strategies of effluents and contaminated sites to eliminate or reduce the available potential of toxic elements [35,36]. Despite this attractive application, the fate of NPs when released into the environment, their interaction with other contaminants and biological systems, and thus their safety, are still largely unknown [37].
Under this scenario, the present study emerges as a complementary study to a previous one carried out by the same research group (Figueira and co-authors [8]), which demonstrated the biosorption capability of marine macroalgae on the removal of Hg, Cd, and Pb from saline waters. Based on the biosorption results obtained, and as a crucial following step, this study aimed to evaluate if the water remediation with marine macroalgae effectively contributed to improving water quality, with measurable gains on the the health of aquatic organisms. To accomplish this goal, we selected the sub-lethal contamination levels from the study by Figueira and co-authors [8], and assessed their impact on the health of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus), a marine flatfish selected as a model organism. The remediation methodology achieved overall efficiencies of up to 99% for Hg, 86% for Pb, and 20% for Cd [8], which at first sight suggests a considerable improvement in the overall health status of turbot. For an even more realistic approach, it is imperative to consider the impact of the co-occurrence of legacy and emergent contaminants in water. Thus, two of the most used metallic NP (Ag NP and Au NP) were added in each treatment. Given the potentially toxic effects of the selected metals and NP isolated [23,24,32,38,39,40,41], we evaluated the genotoxic potential and alteration in the haematological dynamics after fish co-exposure to the selected mixture of metals with and without NP. Plus, the accumulation profile of the tested contaminants was evaluated to establish a relationship between their body burdens and the cytogenetic and biochemical endpoints. These parameters have emerged as tools with great potential for environmental monitoring [42,43,44].
The results of this study will contribute to a better understanding of the biosorption processes described in the literature for metal contaminated waters; go beyond the improvement of the chemical status of the water, contributing to the overall health status of fish; and, in the final stage, minimize the impact of metal contamination on human health.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

All of the chemicals used were of analytical reagent grade. The standard stock solutions of Cd (1000 ± 2 mg/L), Hg (1001 ± 2 mg/L), and Pb (1000 ± 2 mg/L) were purchased from Merck (Damstadt, Germany). Gold NP (10 nm diameter, OD 1, stabilized suspension in 0.1 mM PBS, reactant free) and Ag dispersion NP (10 nm particle size, 0.02 mg/mL in aqueous buffer, with sodium citrate as stabilizer) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Damstadt, Germany). Nitric acid (65%, Merck, Damstadt, Germany), hydrogen peroxide (30%, Scharlab, Spain), and the certified reference materials (CRM) BCR-634 and TORT-2 (LGC Standards, UK) were used for tissue digestion. Methanol (Merck, Damstadt, Germany) and Giemsa (Merck, Damstadt, Germany) were used in the genotoxicity essays and Drabkin’s reagent (Merck, Damstadt, Germany) was used in the haemoglobin determination.

2.2. Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy Analysis

The morphology of Ag NP (stock suspension) was checked by scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) using a Hitachi SU-70 with a Bruker Quantax 400 (B-U) EDS-microscope (Supplementary Materials).

2.3. Test Animals

Juvenile hatchery-brood turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) with an average wet weight of 23.4 ± 6.2 g and an average total length of 11.8 ± 1.0 cm were acquired from a local aquaculture (Acuinova, Mira, Portugal). At the laboratory, the animals were acclimated during 15 days in 25 L polyvinyl aquaria under a natural photoperiod, in aerated and recirculating artificial seawater (Tropic Marin), with salinity 33.8 ± 1.1, temperature 18.2 ± 3.4 °C, pH 8.0 ± 0.2, dissolved oxygen 8.5 ± 1.0 mg/L, and total ammonia 0.62 ± 1.99 mg/L. Fish were fed daily with commercial pellets, until apparent satiation.

2.4. Experimental Design and Exposure Conditions

The assay rationale was to test fish exposure to biosorption-remediated industrial effluent during a short period (7 days), mimicking an episode of industrial effluent discharge. For that, fish were co-exposed to metallic contaminants (Cd, Hg, and Pb) and NP (Ag and Au). Cadmium, Hg, and Pb were tested at two different concentrations each. The highest concentrations were chosen in accordance with the maximum allowable concentrations (MAC: 200 µg/L, 50 µg/L, and 1000 µg/L for Cd, Hg, and Pb, respectively) for effluent discharges, as defined in the European legislation (Directive 2009/90/EC [45]) (Figure 1). In addition to the MAC mixture, it was important to understand if water remediation processes were able to decrease the toxic potential of the mixture. Hence, the lowest concentrations (Rem: 164 µg/L, 0.10 µg/L, and 108 µg/L for Cd, Hg, and Pb, respectively) corresponded to the values obtained after applying a methodology to remediate saline water with the same metallic contaminants, developed within the RemAS project [8] (Figure 1). As NP can influence both their behaviour (availability and toxicity) and that of other elements with which they are mixed [46], the MAC and Rem treatments were tested in the absence and presence of equal concentrations of Ag NP (5 µg/L) and Au NP (5 µg/L) (Figure 1). The concentrations of Ag NP and Au NP tested matched the lowest no effect concentration (NOEC) for Ag found in the marine biota [44].
The experimental assay, schematized in Figure 1, was performed in triplicate with three individuals per replicate in 4 L aerated seawater for 7 days. The natural photoperiod was maintained, and a 25% water change and re-dosing of the chemicals was carried out every other day. The physicochemical parameters of the water during the assay were salinity 32.4 ± 0.5, temperature 20.6 ± 0.6 °C, pH 8.04 ± 0.15, dissolved oxygen 7.99 ± 0.53 mg/L, and total ammonia 10.0 ± 0.0 mg/L.
The mixtures of metal contaminants were prepared fresh by diluting each element stock solution to the desirable concentration in artificial seawater, while nanoparticles were directly added to the fish tanks. The control condition was obtained by using only artificial sea salt.
Fish were sacrificed in accordance with the European Union guidelines concerning the protection and animal welfare (Directive 2010/63/EU [47]) and under the supervision of a member of staff authorized by the competent authorities.

2.5. Determination of Cd, Hg, Pb, and Ag in Blood and Kidney

At the end of the assay (7 days), the fish were sacrificed, and the blood and kidney were sampled and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, followed by storage at −80 °C. Blood was collected from the posterior cardinal vein using heparinised Pasteur pipettes and stored in microtubes. Both the blood and kidneys were freeze-dried, ground to a fine powder, and stored until further processing for metal quantification. Dried blood, kidney, and CRM (BCR-634 and TORT-2 for blood and kidney, respectively) were microwave-digested in duplicate for the determination of Ag, Cd, and Pb using the following procedure: 500 µL of HNO3 (63%) was added to the blood and kidney samples in Savillex PFA vials and placed in a hot plate for 5 h at 150 °C. After cooling, H2O2 (150 µL for blood samples; 100 µL for kidney samples) was carefully added to the samples and placed again in the hot plate at 150 °C for 2 h (blood) or 10 min (kidney). The digested samples were left to cool down overnight in the closed vials. Afterwards, the solution was diluted to 15 mL with ultra-pure water with 1% HNO3 and then analysed by ICP-MS (Thermo X Series, Bremen, Germany). Gold was not determined due to analytical constraints of the methodology. The precision of the method ranged between 0% and 10%, with an extraction efficiency between 99.6% and 124% (determined with the CRM samples). The total Hg (T-Hg) in the dried blood and kidney was analysed by thermal decomposition atomic absorption spectrometry (TD AAS) with gold amalgamation, using an Advanced Mercury Analyser (AMA 254) (LECO®, Czech Republic) [48]. The accuracy and precision of the methodology were assessed by replicate analysis of CRM BCR-634 and TORT-2 for the blood and kidneys, respectively. The precision of the method was always better than 9% (n > 12), with recovery efficiencies between 109 and 116%.

2.6. Genotoxic Potential: Erythrocytic Nuclear Abnormalities (ENA) Assay

To evaluate the genotoxicity of the mixtures (MAC and Rem), the ENA assay was carried out in mature erythrocytes of turbot [49]. Blood smears were fixed with methanol for 10 min and stained with Giemsa (5%) for 30 min. From each smear, 1000 mature erythrocytes were scored under 1000× magnification (Olympus BX41, Tokyo, Japan) to determine the following nuclear lesions categories: kidney shaped nuclei (K), lobed nuclei (L), binucleate or segmented nuclei (S), vacuolated nuclei (V), and micronuclei (MN). Although the frequency (‰) of each nuclear abnormality category was individually reported, the results of the ENA assay were expressed as the sum of the frequencies for all of the categories considered (K + L+S + V + MN).

2.7. Haematological Dynamics

2.7.1. Erythrocytic Maturity Index (EMI) and Immature Erythrocytes (IE) Frequency

EMI was adapted by Castro and co-authors [43], providing information on the progressive route to cell maturity and complementing the data obtained by the frequency of immature erythrocytes (IE). Briefly, 10 fields randomly selected per slide (one slide per fish; the same slides used for ENA and IE assays) were photographed at 40× magnification (Olympus BX41, Tokyo, Japan). Afterwards, digital microphotographs were analysed in ImageJ software and the minor axis of the nucleus and the major axis of the cell were measured in 25 erythrocytes per field. EMI was calculated by dividing the minor axis of the nucleus and the major axis of cell, and then each cell was classified in 1 of the 10 maturity classes, defined as follows: class 1 [0.0; 0.1[; class 2 [0.1; 0.2[; class 3 [0.2; 0.3[; class 4 [0.3; 0.4[; class 5 [0.4; 0.5[; class 6 [0.5; 0.6[; class 7 [0.6; 0.7[; class 8 [0.7; 0.8[; class 9 [0.8; 0.9[; class 10 [0.9; 1.0]. The erythrocyte maturity decreased from class 1 (higher maturity) to class 10 (lower maturity). For each experimental group, the average values for the frequency (%) of cells observed in each maturity class were represented.
For IE scoring, 1000 erythrocytes (mature and immature) were scored per smear, under 1000× magnification (Olympus BX41, Tokyo, Japan). Immature erythrocytes had a bluish-grey cytoplasm and a rounder and larger nucleus than the mature erythrocytes, which had an elliptical and smaller nucleus [50]. The frequency of IE was calculated according to the following expression [51]:
IE   frequency   ( ) = IE ( ME + IE ) × 1000

2.7.2. Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count, Haemoglobin (Hb) Concentration, and Mean Cell Haemoglobin (MCH)

The RBC count and Hb were immediately estimated after blood sampling. The RBC count was carried out using a haemocytometer chamber (Neubauer chamber) and the results were expressed as 106 cells/mm3. Haemoglobin was estimated using the cyanmethaemoglobin method [52], using Drabkin’s reagent. The intensity of the colour is proportional to Hb concentration and was measured spectrophotometrically at 540 nm (SpectraMax 190 plate reader, Avantor, Ireland). MCH represents the absolute amount of Hb in each RBC, and was expressed as picograms (pg) per cell and calculated by the following:
MCH   ( pg ) = Hb   ( g / dL ) × 10 RBC × 10 6   ( 1 / μ L )

2.8. Statistical Analysis and Software

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM.SPSS®, version 27.0, and all of the tests were considered significant when p < 0.05. The effects of the different treatments on the dependent variables (T-Hg, ENA, EMI, IE, RBC, Hb, and MCH) were evaluated through one-way ANOVA, followed by multiple comparisons tests. To verify ANOVA assumptions, graphical validation tools were used. Whenever assumptions were not fulfilled, data were evaluated with the equivalent non-parametric test. The description of the statistical results followed the suggestions of Muff and co-authors [53]. Graphical figures were made in Microsoft PowerPoint (version 2302) and the bar graph was obtained using Prism-GraphPad (trial version).

3. Results

3.1. Accumulation of Hg, Cd, Pb, and Ag in the Blood and Kidneys

The total Hg, Cd, Pb, and Ag accumulation in turbot blood and kidneys after 7 days of exposure are depicted in Table 1.
As a result of restrictions regarding sample mass, replicate analyses were only performed for T-Hg. However, it was possible to infer an accumulation trend for Cd, Pb, and Ag. After 7 days of exposure, there was very strong evidence that the MAC treatments with and without NP (MAC and MAC + NP) accumulated more T-Hg in the blood compared with the other mixtures and the control (F = 32.916; p = 0.000). The kidneys accumulated less T-Hg than the blood, with very strong evidence of no significant differences between the mixtures and control, but highlighting that MAC treatments accumulated more T-Hg than Rem treatments (F = 9.788; p = 0.000). The Cd accumulation trend in the blood was MAC ≈ MAC + NP > Rem ≈ Rem + NP > control, and in the kidneys it was MAC ≈ MAC + NP ≈ Rem + NP > Rem ≈ control. In general, the trend of Pb accumulation in the blood was Rem > MAC > MAC + NP > C > Rem + NP suggesting lower levels than their equivalents without NPs. Lead in the kidneys was similar to that of Cd in the blood. Silver burdens were very low in both the blood and kidneys, with similar levels across treatments. Contrary to T-Hg, the kidneys were more prone to Cd and Pb accumulation than the blood.

3.2. Genotoxic Potential: Erythrocytic Nuclear Abnormalities (ENA)

The results of the ENA assay are depicted in Table 2, scored as individual abnormalities and total ENA.
There was no evidence that the different treatments influenced individual or total ENA frequency, either compared to the control or between treatments (F = 0.115, p = 0.976; H = 5.284, p = 0.259; F = 0.166, p = 0.954, F = 0.267, p = 0.897 for K, L, S, and total ENA, respectively) (Table 2).

3.3. Haematological Dynamics

3.3.1. Erythrocytic Maturity Index (EMI) and Immature Erythrocytes Frequency (IE)

The EMI of turbot was identified up to the seventh class of erythrocytic maturity (Figure 2).
There was also no evidence that the different treatments influenced the EMI (H = 5.385, p = 0.250; F = 0.815, p = 0.527; F = 0.895, p = 0.481; H = 1.228, p = 0.873; F = 0.487, p = 0.745; F = 0.808, p = 0.531; F = 1.629, p = 0.197, from class 1 to 7). Yet, class 7 (lower maturity) was absent in the control and NP treatments (MAC-NP and Rem-NP), while MAC + NP also lacked class 6. Similar to the frequency of ENA, there was little evidence that the different treatments affected the frequency of IE after 7 days of exposure (H = 5.464, p = 0.243) (Figure 3A).

3.3.2. Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count, Haemoglobin (Hb) Concentration, and Mean Cell Haemoglobin (MCH)

There was very strong evidence that RBC increased only in MAC + NP relative to Rem (H = 14.561, p = 0.006; Figure 3B), while the influence of the different treatments on the Hb concentration showed weak evidence of differences relative to the control or among treatments (F = 0.769, p = 0.0555; Figure 3C). In contrast, there was strong evidence that the MCH decreased in MAC + NP against the control (H = 13.498, p = 0.009) (Figure 3D).

4. Discussion

Water is a vital resource, but life needs more than water: it needs safe water. Water was once viewed as an inexhaustible resource with an infinite capacity to purify and dilute everything, but that perspective has been changing. The need to ensure clean water for all is mandatory, and, among others, has led to the search for new methodologies able to remediate contaminated water. Accordingly, we assessed if a proposed biosorption remediation strategy could improve the health of a marine organism. To do this, we focused on a whole mixture approach, including both legacy and emerging contaminants, and assessed the potentially toxic effects of realistic concentrations of chemicals commonly found in effluent discharges (Cd, Hg, and Pb, and Ag-NP and Au-NP), and then compared the whole mixture after remediation. This approach is recommended for a preliminary evaluation of an effluent mixture as it can adequately demonstrate the coexisting exposure that organisms face in the environment [54]. The whole-mixture approach has the advantage of including all of the interactions that a component-based approach may have missed. However, it is not possible to generalise the information obtained to other mixtures or to identify the component(s) responsible for the effects [54]. Our results showed that the proposed remediation strategy was highly efficient at reducing the metal body burden from fish blood and kidney. However, this improvement was not evident in terms of the cytogenetic and biochemical endpoints that indicate the health status of the organism.

4.1. Metals in Fish Blood and Kidneys

Blood is a suitable indicator of metallic environmental concentrations for several organisms, such as turtles, fish, and humans [25,43,55,56,57]. Although blood is not a tissue with a high capacity for accumulation, but rather a vehicle for other organs [57], it can still reflect the immediate uptake from the environment [43,56,58]. Alissa and Ferns [59] found that some human blood constituents can bind metals, showing that RBC can capture 98-99% of the Pb and 95% of Hg. The works of Ley-Quiñónez and co-authors [55] in turtles and of Janicka and co-authors [25] in humans also demonstrated the ability of blood to reflect Cd, Pb, and Hg accumulation. Castro et al. [43] stressed blood suitability to evaluate Hg bioaccumulation. Similar to these studies, we found that blood reflected the metal concentrations tested in the different mixtures, confirming its suitability as a short-term indicator of environmental conditions. Plus, the higher T-Hg levels found in the blood compared with the kidneys reinforced the efficacy of blood to reflect 7 days of exposure. Silver NP and Au NP are known to spread rapidly from the blood to the tissues [60,61]; notwithstanding the lack of information for Au NP in this work, overall Ag levels were in the same range for all of the treatments.
The accumulation trend of Cd and Pb in the kidneys highlights it as one of the main targets for metal accumulation and reinforces its role as a detoxifying organ [24,57,62,63]. Some authors found that Cd accumulates in fish kidneys 48 h after intraperitoneal injection of sub-lethal levels [62] and that the kidneys were the main target for Pb accumulation after 4 weeks of exposure via diet [24]. For T-Hg, the kidneys showed lower levels than the blood and did not show the high accumulation capacity observed in other studies (e.g., [56,57]). However, this difference may be related to the element kinetics. The presence of high levels of xenobiotics in the kidney could induce toxic effects in haematopoiesis and the elimination of xenobiotics [57,62,63]. Therefore, the levels of Cd, Pb, and Ag, and to a lesser extent, Hg, in the kidneys may influence the haematological dynamics of turbot, mainly due to the function of the head−kidney as an organ forming erythroid lineages.
Although the MAC treatments were in line with the allowable concentrations found in industrial effluents, Cd in both the blood and kidneys exceeded the maximum levels allowed for fish muscle meat (0.05 μg/g [64]), except for the blood in the control fish. Similarly, Pb levels were above the maximum permitted levels for fish muscle meat (0.3 μg/g [64]) in the mixtures without NP in the case of blood, and in MAC treatments for the kidney. This evidence confirms the high bioaccumulation ability reported for these elements, and that fish exposed to MAC treatments have unsafe levels of these metals.
The reported interaction between NPs and the other chemicals in a mixture suggests that NP may affect their uptake and that of other chemicals [46]. Yet, in the present study, the presence of NP did not seem to affect accumulation, as the differences found were only between metal concentrations (MAC vs. Rem) and not attributable to the presence of NP (as verified for T-Hg and the trend observed for Cd in blood, and Pb and Ag in the kidney). The high levels found in Rem + NP in the kidney should be carefully interpreted, given the small number of samples.
Overall, it can be highlighted that the chosen remediation methodology promoted a reduction in blood and kidney metal loads in the remediated treatments compared with the MAC treatments (T-Hg: 6.8×, 2.5×; Cd: 2× and Pb: 1.7×, 3×, for blood and kidney, respectively, and Ag in the kidney: 3.7×). The reduction in these metallic body burdens may promote an improvement in the health status of fish (even beyond the assessed parameters) and considerably decrease the risk for human health by fish ingestion. This is especially evident for Cd and Pb, whose levels in MAC treatments were above the legal thresholds.

4.2. Genotoxicity and Alteration of Haematological Parameters

Genotoxicity endpoints such as DNA and chromosomal damage successfully demonstrated the toxic potential of several chemicals, particularly those whose mechanism of action is through oxidative stress-mediated processes such as Hg, Cd, Pb, Ag NP, and Au NP [31,38,39,41,51]. Nevertheless, in the present study, no significant increases in ENA frequency (total and individual) occurred in any treatment, particularly in the MAC treatments, which may indicate either no genotoxic potential of the mixture after a short-term exposure or an efficient protective response by the fish. Guilherme and co-authors [51] suggested precaution when evaluating the genotoxic potential in the absence of ENA as other types of DNA damage might occur, rather than the ability to cope with the damage. Udroi (2006) pointed out that this phenomenon could result from the inhibition of DNA synthesis, time of maturation of erythrocytes, and erythropoiesis inhibition [65]. Other authors have advocated that increasing erythrocytic catabolism could promote the erythropoietic rate, which can lead to the absence of ENA [49,50]. Pacheco and Santos (2002) suggested that under a constant erythropoiesis rate, fast elimination of the abnormal erythrocytes from the spleen can occur, and thus no ENA can be detected [66]. For these reasons, it is crucial to complement ENA assessment with erythrocytic kinetics, assessed by the frequency of IE and EMI. The frequency of IE provides knowledge of the haematological dynamics, reflecting the balance between several factors, such as immature cells input versus splenic cells removal and the cell maturation rate. In the present study, similar to the pattern observed with ENA, no increase in the frequency of IE was observed, indicating no changes in the haemodynamic profile, which may suggest that MAC treatments both with and without NPs are not cytotoxic.
Although IE frequency provides indirect information on the erythrocyte catabolism and erythropoiesis, thus complementing the ENA assay, it does not provide information regarding the different stages of erythrocyte maturity. Fish erythrocytes exhibit different cell stages simultaneously [67], which may hinder the interpretation of data such as the frequency of IE. Hence, as shown by Castro and co-authors, EMI emerges as a suitable tool to assess erythrocytes’ maturity, establishing an erythron profile [43]. Nonetheless, EMI seems species-specific: a study performed using eels (Anguilla anguilla) showed the presence of 10 maturity classes [43], in contrast with the seven classes obtained in turbot. In this work, classes 6 and 7 showed a low frequency in all of the conditions, with class 7 absent from the control and MAC and Rem treatments with NP. Class 6 was missing from MAC + NP treatments, which might suggest a lower erythropoiesis rate within this mixture. The EMI and IE results suggest no relevant alterations of erythropoiesis.
The alteration of haematological parameters such as RBC, Hb, and MCH also provides information regarding fish health after exposure to contaminants [42,68,69,70]. In our study, the RBC count was within the range of values previously found in farmed turbot and generally less-active species (usual ranges from 0.5 to 1.5 × 106/µL) [71]. Changes in the number of RBCs are usually associated with changes in oxygen supply induced by chemical stressors and other factors [72]. Overall, the RBC count was similar between all of the treatments and the control, denoting no effects from the mixtures on these target cells. However, there was an increase in erythrocyte counts in MAC + NP compared with Rem, suggesting an increase in oxygen demands in MAC + NP, which demonstrates the adaptive responses of fish to challenging conditions. Witeska (2005) linked the increase in RBC to fish adaptive responses after short-term exposure to metals [72], which shows their ability to maintain the uptake of oxygen from the environment [73]. Similar to RBC, Hb levels were constant among treatments. Despite the fact that haematological parameters are reliable for assessing fish health, they display different responses depending on the stressor, fish species, and exposure [72,74,75]. For instance, the common carp (Cyprinus carpio) showed increasing levels of RBC and Hb after exposure to several metals, including Cd and Pb [74], as did tench (Tinca tinca) after short-term sub-lethal exposure to Hg [76]. Decreasing levels of RBC and Hb were reported for grey mullet (Mugil cephalus) after exposure to Cd and Pb [75], while the common carp showed no changes in RBC [72]. The presence of Ag NP induced a decrease in RBC and Hb in the Caucasian scrapper (Capoeta capoeta) [77], but the Ag NP concentration tested was 1000 times higher than that used in this work, suggesting that the low levels tested were unlikely to induce changes in these parameters.
Contrary to RBC and Hb, MCH was decreased in MAC + NP treatments relative to the control. Low MCH levels suggest a limitation in Hb synthesis and thus lower Hb levels at each RBC, which does not reflect the total Hb concentration as the body responds with a slight increase in RBC. The increase in RBC counts at MAC + NP may indicate a mechanism through which fish compensate for poor oxygen uptake. Some authors found that the exposure of fish to metals (e.g., Cd) reduced the haematopoietic ability of the kidney [75,78]. In general, the metallic burden of the kidney was higher in MAC conditions relative to the control, which might compromise this organ’s performance.
Overall, the MAC treatments did not induce significant changes in the haematological dynamics of turbot, which could be due to their realistic levels and/or the short-term exposure. In addition, we only assessed a few of the several parameters that could provide an early warning for fish health impairment following exposure to chemical stressors. The changes in MCH levels suggest that the effects of these stressors on the kidney should be further investigated.

5. Conclusions

The biosorption remediation process using non-living and non-chemically treated powders of Ulva lactuca and Fucus vesiculosus proposed by Figueira and co-authors [8] was efficient in the removal of potential toxic metals (Hg, Pb) from saline waters, with removal efficiencies of up to 99% for Hg and up to 86% for Pb. This improvement in the chemical status of the water efficiently reduced the bioaccumulation potential of the tested metallic mixture, evidenced by the significant decrease of these elements in the blood and kidney of turbot. Although this remediation strategy prevented the bioaccumulation potential of the non-remediated treatments, the improvement in the turbot health status was not so evident. Overall, the non-remediated treatments (MAC) showed no genotoxicity or marked cytotoxic potential. The slight changes in haematological dynamics suggest that prolonged exposure to this mixture (MAC) may induce changes in kidney and overall erythropoiesis, while maintaining optimal conditions in the remediated treatments. The main reason for not being able to signal improvements in the physiological status of the fish is that MAC treatments (pre-remediation levels) showed no significant effects, suggesting that the currently set effluent limits should be adjusted to maintain fish health status. This study highlights that the validation of new remediation methods should comply with their ability to reduce body burdens and maintain or improve the health of aquatic organisms. Furthermore, it highlights that the evaluation of remediation methods should weigh process costs against the benefits to organisms, which, as this work shows, is not an easy equation to establish, despite the advocated benefits of the many strategies described in the literature.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/w15081564/s1, Figure S1: Scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) images of silver nanoparticles (Ag NP) dispersion (stock supension, scale 150 nm).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.P., E.P., M.P. and C.B.L.; Methodology, C.L.M., J.P.C., A.T.R. and P.F.; Validation, M.P.; Formal analysis, C.L.M.; Investigation, C.L.M., J.P.C., A.T.R., D.C., P.F., F.M. and C.B.L.; Resources, M.A.P. and E.P.; Data curation, C.L.M., J.P.C., A.T.R., D.C., P.F., F.M. and C.B.L.; Writing—original draft, C.L.M., J.P.C., C.B.L. and A.T.R.; Writing—review & editing, C.L.M., M.P. and C.B.L.; Supervision, M.A.P., E.P. and C.B.L.; Project administration, C.B.L.; Funding acquisition, C.B.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by RemAS—Magnetic nanoparticle and biowaste-based strategies for remediation of salt water under multi-stressor conditions (inorganic and emerging pollutants): evaluation of ecological and human risk PTDC/MAR-BIO/3533/2012 -FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-029345, supported by FCT/MEC through national funds, and co-funding by the FEDER, within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement and Compete 2020. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, I.P.) also funded individual grants/contracts and institutional strategic projects as follows: P. Figueira (SFRH/BD/139077/2018), A.T. Reis (SFRH/BPD/122112/2016), C.B. Lopes (CEECIND/03739/2021), J.P. Coelho (CEECIND/01778/2020), C.L. Mieiro and F. Martinho (DL57/2016), CESAM Strategic Project UIDP/50017/2020+UIDB/50017/2020+LA/P/0094/2020, CFE Strategic Project UIDB/04004/2020 and project CICECO-Aveiro Institute of Materials, UIDB/50011/2020, UIDP/50011/2020 and LA/P/0006/2020, financed by national funds through the FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC).

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are in debt with J. Batista for the support provided during fish maintenance and acclimation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

  1. The water crisis is worsening. Researchers must tackle it together. Nature 2023, 613, 611–612. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Barragán-Peña, P.; Macedo-Miranda, M.G.; Olguin, M.T. Cadmium removal from wastewater in a fixed-bed column system with modified-natural clinoptilolite-rich tuff. Chem. Pap. 2021, 75, 485–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ozdemir, S.; Dündar, A.; Dizge, N.; Kılınç, E.; Balakrishnan, D.; Prasad, K.S.; Senthilkumar, N. Preconcentrations of Pb(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II) by solid phase bio-extractor using thermophilic Bacillus subtilis loaded multiwalled carbon nanotube biosorbent. Chemosphere 2023, 317, 137840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pandey, A.; Kalamdhad, A.; Sharma, Y.C. Recent advances of nanocellulose as biobased adsorbent for heavy metal ions removal: A sustainable approach integrating with waste management. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2023, 20, 100791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pinheiro, P.C.; Tavares, D.S.; Daniel-Da-Silva, A.L.; Lopes, C.B.; Pereira, E.; Araújo, J.P.; Sousa, C.T.; Trindade, T. Ferromagnetic Sorbents Based on Nickel Nanowires for Efficient Uptake of Mercury from Water. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 8274–8280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fabre, E.; Lopes, C.B.; Vale, C.; Pereira, E.; Silva, C.M. Valuation of banana peels as an effective biosorbent for mercury removal under low environmental concentrations. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 709, 135883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rocha, L.S.; Lopes, I.; Lopes, C.B.; Henriques, B.; Soares, A.M.V.M.; Duarte, A.C.; Pereira, E. Efficiency of a cleanup technology to remove mercury from natural waters by means of rice husk biowaste: Ecotoxicological and chemical approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 8146–8156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Figueira, P.; Henriques, B.; Teixeira, A.; Lopes, C.B.; Reis, A.T.; Monteiro, R.J.R.; Duarte, A.C.; Pardal, M.A.; Pereira, E. Comparative study on metal biosorption by two macroalgae in saline waters: Single and ternary systems. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 11985–11997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lopes, C.B.; Lopes, I.; Rocha, L.S.; Duarte, A.C.; Soares, A.M.V.M.; Rocha, J.; Pereira, E. A Multidisciplinary Approach to Evaluate the Efficiency of a Clean-Up Technology to Remove Mercury from Water. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2014, 93, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jonnalagadda, S.; Rao, P. Toxicity, bioavailability and metal speciation. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Pharmacol. Toxicol. Endocrinol. 1993, 106, 585–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nurchi, V.M.; Villaescusa, I. Sorption of toxic metal ions by solid sorbents: A predictive speciation approach based on complex formation constants in aqueous solution. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2012, 256, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liess, M.; Henz, S.; Shahid, N. Modeling the synergistic effects of toxicant mixtures. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2020, 32, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zorita, I.; Ortiz-Zarragoitia, M.; Apraiz, I.; Cancio, I.; Orbea, A.; Soto, M.; Marigómez, I.; Cajaraville, M.P. Assessment of biological effects of environmental pollution along the NW Mediterranean Sea using red mullets as sentinel organisms. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 153, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Costa, P.M.; Caeiro, S.; Diniz, M.; Lobo-Arteaga, J.; Martins, M.; Ferreira, A.M.; Caetano, M.; Vale, C.; Del Valls, T.; Costa, M.H. Biochemical endpoints on juvenile Solea senegalensis exposed to estuarine sediments: The effect of contaminant mixtures on metallothionein and CYP1A induction. Ecotoxicology 2009, 18, 988–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. EUR-Lex-52012DC0252-EN-EUR-Lex 20. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52012DC0252 (accessed on 20 February 2023).
  16. Wilk, A.; Romanowski, M.; Wiszniewska, B. Analysis of Cadmium, Mercury, and Lead Concentrations in Erythrocytes of Renal Transplant Recipients from Northwestern Poland. Biology 2021, 10, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. EUR-Lex-32008L0105-EN-EUR-Lex. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/105/oj (accessed on 20 February 2023).
  18. Hossain, T.; Khandaker, S.; Bashar, M.M.; Islam, A.; Ahmed, M.; Akter, R.; Alsukaibi, A.K.; Hasan, M.; Alshammari, H.M.; Kuba, T.; et al. Simultaneous toxic Cd(II) and Pb(II) encapsulation from contaminated water using Mg/Al-LDH composite materials. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 368, 120810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Akpor, O.B. Heavy Metal Pollutants in Wastewater Effluents: Sources, Effects and Remediation. Adv. Biosci. Bioeng. 2014, 2, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Coelho, J.; Mieiro, C.; Pereira, E.; Duarte, A.; Pardal, M. Mercury biomagnification in a contaminated estuary food web: Effects of age and trophic position using stable isotope analyses. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2013, 69, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Souid, G.; Souayed, N.; Yaktiti, F.; Maaroufi, K. Effect of acute cadmium exposure on metal accumulation and oxidative stress biomarkers of Sparus aurata. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 89, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mieiro, C.L.; Dolbeth, M.; Marques, T.A.; Duarte, A.C.; Pereira, M.E.; Pacheco, M. Mercury accumulation and tissue-specific antioxidant efficiency in the wild European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) with emphasis on seasonality. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 10638–10651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, X.; Zhou, H.; Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, G.; Jin, T. Effects of lead and cadmium co-exposure on hemoglobin in a Chinese population. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2015, 39, 758–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kim, J.-H.; Kang, J.-C. The lead accumulation and hematological findings in juvenile rock fish Sebastes schlegelii exposed to the dietary lead (II) concentrations. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 115, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Janicka, M.; Binkowski, J.; Błaszczyk, M.; Paluch, J.; Wojtaś, W.; Massanyi, P.; Stawarz, R. Cadmium, lead and mercury concentrations and their influence on morphological parameters in blood donors from different age groups from southern Poland. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2015, 29, 342–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hasan, M.; Kubra, K.T.; Hasan, N.; Awual, E.; Salman, S.; Sheikh, C.; Rehan, A.I.; Rasee, A.I.; Waliullah, R.; Islam, S.; et al. Sustainable ligand-modified based composite material for the selective and effective cadmium(II) capturing from wastewater. J. Mol. Liq. 2023, 371, 121125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Nanosafety at the OECD: The First Five Years 2006–2010, Better Policies for Better Lives; OECD: Paris, France, 2011; p. 16. [Google Scholar]
  28. Farkas, J.; Christian, P.; Urrea, J.G.; Roos, N.; Hassellöv, M.; Tollefsen, K.E.; Thomas, K.V. Effects of silver and gold nanoparticles on rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) hepatocytes. Aquat. Toxicol. 2010, 96, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Panda, K.K.; Achary, V.M.M.; Krishnaveni, R.; Padhi, B.K.; Sarangi, S.N.; Sahu, S.N.; Panda, B.B. In vitro biosynthesis and genotoxicity bioassay of silver nanoparticles using plants. Toxicol. In Vitro 2011, 25, 1097–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pan, J.-F.; Buffet, P.-E.; Poirier, L.; Amiard-Triquet, C.; Gilliland, D.; Joubert, Y.; Pilet, P.; Guibbolini, M.; de Faverney, C.R.; Roméo, M.; et al. Size dependent bioaccumulation and ecotoxicity of gold nanoparticles in an endobenthic invertebrate: The Tellinid clam Scrobicularia plana. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 168, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chuang, S.-M.; Lee, Y.-H.; Liang, R.-Y.; Roam, G.-D.; Zeng, Z.-M.; Tu, H.-F.; Wang, S.-K.; Chueh, P.J. Extensive evaluations of the cytotoxic effects of gold nanoparticles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Gen. Subj. 2013, 1830, 4960–4973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Moreno-Garrido, I.; Pérez, S.; Blasco, J. Toxicity of silver and gold nanoparticles on marine microalgae. Mar. Environ. Res. 2015, 111, 60–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Qian, Y.; Zhang, J.; Hu, Q.; Xu, M.; Chen, Y.; Hu, G.; Zhao, M.; Liu, S. Silver nanoparticle-induced hemoglobin decrease involves alteration of histone 3 methylation status. Biomaterials 2015, 70, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sharma, N.; Rather, M.A.; Ajima, M.N.O.; Gireesh-Babu, P.; Kumar, K.; Sharma, R. Assessment of DNA damage and molecular responses in Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822) following short-term exposure to silver nanoparticles. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2016, 96, 122–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, J.; Hou, B.; Wang, J.; Tian, B.; Bi, J.; Wang, N.; Li, X.; Huang, X. Nanomaterials for the Removal of Heavy Metals from Wastewater. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zahoor, M.; Nazir, N.; Iftikhar, M.; Naz, S.; Zekker, I.; Burlakovs, J.; Uddin, F.; Kamran, A.W.; Kallistova, A.; Pimenov, N.; et al. A Review on Silver Nanoparticles: Classification, Various Methods of Synthesis, and Their Potential Roles in Biomedical Applications and Water Treatment. Water 2021, 13, 2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Karn, B.; Kuiken, T.; Otto, M. Nanotechnology and in Situ Remediation: A Review of the Benefits and Potential Risks. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009, 117, 1813–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jha, A.N. Ecotoxicological applications and significance of the comet assay. Mutagenesis 2008, 23, 207–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Patlolla, A.K.; Hackett, D.; Tchounwou, P.B. Genotoxicity study of silver nanoparticles in bone marrow cells of Sprague–Dawley rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2015, 85, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tortella, G.; Rubilar, O.; Durán, N.; Diez, M.; Martínez, M.; Parada, J.; Seabra, A. Silver nanoparticles: Toxicity in model organisms as an overview of its hazard for human health and the environment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 390, 121974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Krishnaraj, C.; Harper, S.L.; Yun, S.-I. In Vivo toxicological assessment of biologically synthesized silver nanoparticles in adult Zebrafish (Danio rerio). J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 301, 480–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Maceda-Veiga, A.; Monroy, M.; Navarro, E.; Viscor, G.; de Sostoa, A. Metal concentrations and pathological responses of wild native fish exposed to sewage discharge in a Mediterranean river. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 449, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Castro, D.; Mieiro, C.; Coelho, J.; Guilherme, S.; Marques, A.; Santos, M.; Duarte, A.; Pereira, E.; Pacheco, M. Addressing the impact of mercury estuarine contamination in the European eel (Anguilla anguilla L., 1758)—An early diagnosis in glass eel stage based on erythrocytic nuclear morphology. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 127, 733–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shahjahan, M.; Islam, J.; Hossain, T.; Alam Mishu, M.; Hasan, J.; Brown, C. Blood biomarkers as diagnostic tools: An overview of climate-driven stress responses in fish. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 843, 156910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. EUR-Lex-32009L0090-EN-EUR-Lex. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32009L0090 (accessed on 20 February 2023).
  46. Naasz, S.; Altenburger, R.; Kühnel, D. Environmental mixtures of nanomaterials and chemicals: The Trojan-horse phenomenon and its relevance for ecotoxicity. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 635, 1170–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. EUR-Lex-32010L0063-EN-EUR-Lex. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32010L0063 (accessed on 20 February 2023).
  48. Costley, C.T.; Mossop, K.F.; Dean, J.R.; Garden, L.M.; Marshall, J.; Carroll, J. Determination of mercury in environmental and biological samples using pyrolysis atomic absorption spectrometry with gold amalgamation. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 405, 179–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pacheco, M.; Santos, M. Induction of EROD Activity and Genotoxic Effects by Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Resin Acids on the Juvenile Eel (Anguilla anguillaL.). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1997, 38, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Marques, A.; Custódio, M.; Guilherme, S.; Gaivão, I.; Santos, M.A.; Pacheco, M. Assessment of chromosomal damage induced by a deltamethrin-based insecticide in fish (Anguilla anguilla L.)—A follow-up study upon exposure and post-exposure periods. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2014, 113, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guilherme, S.; Válega, M.; Pereira, M.; Santos, M.; Pacheco, M. Erythrocytic nuclear abnormalities in wild and caged fish (Liza aurata) along an environmental mercury contamination gradient. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2008, 70, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. van Kampen, E.; Zijlstra, W.G. Standardization of hemoglobinometry II. The hemiglobincyanide method. Clin. Chim. Acta 1961, 6, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Muff, S.; Nilsen, E.B.; O’hara, R.B.; Nater, C.R. Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2022, 37, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Heys, K.A.; Shore, R.F.; Pereira, M.G.; Jones, K.C.; Martin, F.L. Risk assessment of environmental mixture effects. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 47844–47857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ley-Quiñónez, C.; Zavala-Norzagaray, A.; Espinosa-Carreón, T.; Peckham, H.; Marquez-Herrera, C.; Campos-Villegas, L.; Aguirre, A. Baseline heavy metals and metalloid values in blood of loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) from Baja California Sur, Mexico. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011, 62, 1979–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mieiro, C.L.; Pacheco, M.; Pereira, M.E.; Duarte, A.C. Mercury distribution in key tissues of fish (Liza aurata) inhabiting a contaminated estuary—Implications for human and ecosystem health risk assessment. J. Environ. Monit. 2009, 11, 1004–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mieiro, C.; Duarte, A.; Pereira, M.; Pacheco, M. Mercury accumulation patterns and biochemical endpoints in wild fish (Liza aurata): A multi-organ approach. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2011, 74, 2225–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nordberg, G.F.; Fowler, B.A.; Nordberg, M.; Friberg, L.T. Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Alissa, E.M.; Ferns, G.A. Heavy Metal Poisoning and Cardiovascular Disease. J. Toxicol. 2011, 2011, 870125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. De Jonge, M.; Belpaire, C.; Van Thuyne, G.; Breine, J.; Bervoets, L. Temporal distribution of accumulated metal mixtures in two feral fish species and the relation with condition metrics and community structure. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 197, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lankveld, D.P.K.; Oomen, A.G.; Krystek, P.; Neigh, A.; De Jong, A.T.; Noorlander, C.W.; Van Eijkeren, J.; Geertsma, R.E.; De Jong, W.H. The kinetics of the tissue distribution of silver nanoparticles of different sizes. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 8350–8361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ghedira, J.; Jebali, J.; Bouraoui, Z.; Banni, M.; Guerbej, H.; Boussetta, H. Metallothionein and metal levels in liver, gills and kidney of Sparus aurata exposed to sublethal doses of cadmium and copper. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 36, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sonne, C.; Aspholm, O.; Dietz, R.; Andersen, S.; Berntssen, M.H.; Hylland, K. A study of metal concentrations and metallothionein binding capacity in liver, kidney and brain tissues of three Arctic seal species. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 6166–6172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. EUR-Lex-32006R1881-EN-EUR-Lex. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32006R1881 (accessed on 20 February 2023).
  65. Udroiu, I. The micronucleus test in piscine erythrocytes. Aquat. Toxicol. 2006, 79, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pacheco, M.; Santos, M.A. Biotransformation, genotoxic, and histopathological effects of environmental contaminants in European eel (Anguilla anguilla L.). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2002, 53, 331–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Elahee, K.; Bhagwant, S. Hematological and gill histopathological parameters of three tropical fish species from a polluted lagoon on the west coast of Mauritius. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2007, 68, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Adhikari, S.; Sarkar, B.; Chatterjee, A.; Mahapatra, C.; Ayyappan, S. Effects of cypermethrin and carbofuran on certain hematological parameters and prediction of their recovery in a freshwater teleost, Labeo rohita (Hamilton). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2004, 58, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Ribeiro, C.O.; Neto, F.F.; Mela, M.; Silva, P.; Randi, M.; Rabitto, I.; Costa, J.A.; Pelletier, E. Hematological findings in neotropical fish Hoplias malabaricus exposed to subchronic and dietary doses of methylmercury, inorganic lead, and tributyltin chloride. Environ. Res. 2006, 101, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Burgos-Aceves, M.A.; Lionetti, L.; Faggio, C. Multidisciplinary haematology as prognostic device in environmental and xenobiotic stress-induced response in fish. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 670, 1170–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Witeska, M. Erythrocytes in teleost fishes: A review. Zool. Ecol. 2013, 23, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Witeska, M. Stress in fish- hematological and immunological effects of heavy metals. Electron. J. Ichthyol. 2005, 1, 35–41. [Google Scholar]
  73. Sadauskas-Henrique, H.; Sakuragui, M.M.; Paulino, M.G.; Fernandes, M.N. Using condition factor and blood variable biomarkers in fish to assess water quality. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 181, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gaber, H.S.; El-Kasheif, M.; Ibrahim, S.; Authman, M.M.N. Effect of water pollution in El-Rahawy drainage canal on hematology and organs of freshwater fish Clarias gariepinus. World Appl. Sci. J. 2013, 21, 329–341. [Google Scholar]
  75. Fazio, F.; Piccione, G.; Tribulato, K.; Ferrantelli, V.; Giangrosso, G.; Arfuso, F.; Faggio, C. Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals in Blood and Tissue of Striped Mullet in Two Italian Lakes. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 2014, 26, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Shah, S.L.; Altindag, A. Hematological Parameters of Tench (Tinca tinca L.) after Acute and Chronic Exposure to Lethal and Sublethal Mercury Treatments. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2004, 73, 911–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Azadikhah, D.; Yalsuyi, A.M.; Saha, S.; Saha, N.C.; Faggio, C. Biochemical and Pathophysiological Responses in Capoeta capoeta under Lethal and Sub-Lethal Exposures of Silver Nanoparticles. Water 2023, 15, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kondera, E. Haematopoiesis in the head kidney of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.): A morphological study. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 37, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental design, treatments, and concentrations. MAC—maximum concentrations allowable for effluent discharges; Rem—MAC concentrations after remediation processes; MAC + NP—maximum concentrations allowable for effluent discharges plus Ag-NP and Au-NP; Rem + NP—MAC concentrations after remediation processes plus Ag-NP and Au-NP. ASW—artificial seawater; Cd—cadmium; Hg—mercury; Pb—lead.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental design, treatments, and concentrations. MAC—maximum concentrations allowable for effluent discharges; Rem—MAC concentrations after remediation processes; MAC + NP—maximum concentrations allowable for effluent discharges plus Ag-NP and Au-NP; Rem + NP—MAC concentrations after remediation processes plus Ag-NP and Au-NP. ASW—artificial seawater; Cd—cadmium; Hg—mercury; Pb—lead.
Water 15 01564 g001
Figure 2. Erythrocytic maturity index (EMI) in S. maximus exposed to different metallic mixtures, with and without nanoparticles, for 7 consecutive days. (A) Mean values for the frequency (%) of cells observed in each maturity class (maturity decreases from class 1 to class 7) are represented. (B) Detailed representation of the frequency (%) of EMI classes 6 and 7. MAC—maximum concentrations allowable for effluents discharges; Rem—MAC concentrations after remediation processes; MAC + NP—maximum concentrations allowable for effluent discharges plus Ag-NP and Au-NP; Rem + NP—MAC concentrations after remediation processes plus Ag-NP and Au-NP.
Figure 2. Erythrocytic maturity index (EMI) in S. maximus exposed to different metallic mixtures, with and without nanoparticles, for 7 consecutive days. (A) Mean values for the frequency (%) of cells observed in each maturity class (maturity decreases from class 1 to class 7) are represented. (B) Detailed representation of the frequency (%) of EMI classes 6 and 7. MAC—maximum concentrations allowable for effluents discharges; Rem—MAC concentrations after remediation processes; MAC + NP—maximum concentrations allowable for effluent discharges plus Ag-NP and Au-NP; Rem + NP—MAC concentrations after remediation processes plus Ag-NP and Au-NP.
Water 15 01564 g002
Figure 3. Haematological dynamics in S. maximus exposed to different metallic mixtures, with and without nanoparticles, for 7 consecutive days. (A) Immature erythrocyte frequency (%), (B) red blood cell count (106 cells/mm3), (C) haemoglobin (g/dL), and (D) mean cell haemoglobin (pg). MAC—maximum concentrations allowable for effluents discharges; Rem−MAC concentrations after remediation processes; MAC + NP—maximum concentrations allowable for effluent discharges plus Ag-NP and Au-NP; Rem + NP—MAC concentrations after remediation processes plus Ag-NP and Au-NP. Different lower-case letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05). Columns correspond to mean values and error bars represent the standard deviation.
Figure 3. Haematological dynamics in S. maximus exposed to different metallic mixtures, with and without nanoparticles, for 7 consecutive days. (A) Immature erythrocyte frequency (%), (B) red blood cell count (106 cells/mm3), (C) haemoglobin (g/dL), and (D) mean cell haemoglobin (pg). MAC—maximum concentrations allowable for effluents discharges; Rem−MAC concentrations after remediation processes; MAC + NP—maximum concentrations allowable for effluent discharges plus Ag-NP and Au-NP; Rem + NP—MAC concentrations after remediation processes plus Ag-NP and Au-NP. Different lower-case letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05). Columns correspond to mean values and error bars represent the standard deviation.
Water 15 01564 g003
Table 1. Mean concentrations (µg/g, fresh weight) of total mercury (T-Hg), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), and silver (Ag) in the blood and kidneys of turbot (S. maximus) exposed to different metallic mixtures, with and without nanoparticles, for 7 consecutive days. T-Hg data are represented by mean ± standard deviation and different lower-case letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05). MAC—maximum concentrations allowable for effluents discharges; Rem—MAC concentrations after remediation processes; MAC + NP—maximum concentrations allowable for effluent discharges plus Ag-NP and Au-NP; Rem + NP—MAC concentrations after remediation processes plus Ag-NP and Au-NP; LOD—limit of detection.
Table 1. Mean concentrations (µg/g, fresh weight) of total mercury (T-Hg), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), and silver (Ag) in the blood and kidneys of turbot (S. maximus) exposed to different metallic mixtures, with and without nanoparticles, for 7 consecutive days. T-Hg data are represented by mean ± standard deviation and different lower-case letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05). MAC—maximum concentrations allowable for effluents discharges; Rem—MAC concentrations after remediation processes; MAC + NP—maximum concentrations allowable for effluent discharges plus Ag-NP and Au-NP; Rem + NP—MAC concentrations after remediation processes plus Ag-NP and Au-NP; LOD—limit of detection.
TreatmentsT-HgCdPbAg
BloodControl0.053 ± 0.020 a0.0500.0810.050
MAC0.23 ± 0.08 b0.200.270.010
MAC + NP0.28 ± 0.08 b0.250.160.004
Rem0.038 ± 0.011 a0.0970.44<LOD
Rem + NP0.041 ± 0.005 a0.120.0360.028
KidneyControl0.019 ± 0.009 a,c0.450.0750.028
MAC0.04 ± 0.01 a,c0.730.520.033
MAC + NP0.04 ± 0.02 a,c0.780.60<LOD
Rem0.015 ± 0.002 a0.460.18<LOD
Rem + NP0.016 ± 0.003 a0.660.160.007
Table 2. Mean frequency (‰) of each nuclear abnormality category (mean ± standard deviation) in the peripheral erythrocytes of turbot (S. maximus) exposed to different metallic mixtures, with and without nanoparticles, for 7 consecutive days. Values (‰) concern the sum of frequencies for all of the nuclear abnormality categories scored (ENA frequency) and the frequency of each abnormality category individually. MAC—maximum concentrations allowable for effluents discharges; Rem—MAC concentrations after remediation processes; MAC + NP—maximum concentrations allowable for effluents discharges plus Ag-NP and Au-NP; Rem + NP—MAC concentrations after remediation processes plus Ag-NP and Au-NP.
Table 2. Mean frequency (‰) of each nuclear abnormality category (mean ± standard deviation) in the peripheral erythrocytes of turbot (S. maximus) exposed to different metallic mixtures, with and without nanoparticles, for 7 consecutive days. Values (‰) concern the sum of frequencies for all of the nuclear abnormality categories scored (ENA frequency) and the frequency of each abnormality category individually. MAC—maximum concentrations allowable for effluents discharges; Rem—MAC concentrations after remediation processes; MAC + NP—maximum concentrations allowable for effluents discharges plus Ag-NP and Au-NP; Rem + NP—MAC concentrations after remediation processes plus Ag-NP and Au-NP.
TreatmentsIndividual Nuclear AbnormalitiesTotal ENA
Kidney (k)Lobed (L)Segmented (S)Vacuolated (V)Micronuclei (MN)
Control3.3 ± 3.12.7 ± 1.54.0 ± 5.00 ± 00 ± 010 ± 6
MAC4.0 ± 2.05.3 ± 4.44.2 ± 4.50.2 ± 0.40 ± 014 ± 9
MAC + NP4.3 ± 2.62.3 ± 3.83.5 ± 3.70 ± 00 ± 010 ± 9
Rem3.8 ± 1.95.7 ± 3.23.3 ± 2.50 ± 00 ± 013 ± 6
Rem + NP3.0 ± 3.04.2 ± 3.32.2 ± 1.60 ± 00 ± 09.3 ± 6.9
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mieiro, C.L.; Coelho, J.P.; Reis, A.T.; Castro, D.; Figueira, P.; Martinho, F.; Pardal, M.A.; Pereira, E.; Pacheco, M.; Lopes, C.B. Integrated Use of Bioaccumulation, Genotoxic, and Haematological Endpoints to Assess the Effect of Water Remediation Strategies on Fish Health: A Complementary Study. Water 2023, 15, 1564. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15081564

AMA Style

Mieiro CL, Coelho JP, Reis AT, Castro D, Figueira P, Martinho F, Pardal MA, Pereira E, Pacheco M, Lopes CB. Integrated Use of Bioaccumulation, Genotoxic, and Haematological Endpoints to Assess the Effect of Water Remediation Strategies on Fish Health: A Complementary Study. Water. 2023; 15(8):1564. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15081564

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mieiro, Cláudia Leopoldina, João Pedro Coelho, Ana Teresa Reis, Diana Castro, Paula Figueira, Filipe Martinho, Miguel A. Pardal, Eduarda Pereira, Mário Pacheco, and Cláudia B. Lopes. 2023. "Integrated Use of Bioaccumulation, Genotoxic, and Haematological Endpoints to Assess the Effect of Water Remediation Strategies on Fish Health: A Complementary Study" Water 15, no. 8: 1564. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15081564

APA Style

Mieiro, C. L., Coelho, J. P., Reis, A. T., Castro, D., Figueira, P., Martinho, F., Pardal, M. A., Pereira, E., Pacheco, M., & Lopes, C. B. (2023). Integrated Use of Bioaccumulation, Genotoxic, and Haematological Endpoints to Assess the Effect of Water Remediation Strategies on Fish Health: A Complementary Study. Water, 15(8), 1564. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15081564

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop