Next Article in Journal
How to Incorporate System Archetypes into Water Conflicts Analysis: Application in Euphrates, Nile, Zambezi, and Lake Kivu Transboundary Basins
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Application of a Methodology for the Identification of Potential Groundwater Recharge Zones: A Case Study in the Virvini Micro-Basin, Tiraque, Bolivia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of the Hydroelectric Dam on Aquifer Recharge Processes in the Krško Field and the Vrbina Area: Evidence from Hydrogen and Oxygen Isotopes
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Environmental Changes Recorded in Tufa from the Korana River, Croatia: Geochemical and Isotopic Approach

Water 2023, 15(7), 1269; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15071269
by Andreja Sironić 1,*,†, Mavro Lučić 1,†, Igor Felja 2 and Darko Tibljaš 2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Water 2023, 15(7), 1269; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15071269
Submission received: 25 February 2023 / Revised: 15 March 2023 / Accepted: 17 March 2023 / Published: 23 March 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report (Previous Reviewer 3)

The manuscript a study of the chemical composition and isotopic composition of O, C in a recent laminated tufa developed around a wooden pillar on the banks of Plitvice Lakes from 1979 to 2003. This can be important to find a possible anthropogenic contribution of potentially toxic elements.

This manuscrkipt has been previously submitted to Water and now it has been highly improved. I provide only very small suggestions to change.

Line 152. “Tufa, analyzed in this paper, was located in the area built “. Replace “was located in..” by  “is located in…”

Figure 1.  The direction of the cross-section should be a straight line from A to E.

At the end of the figure caption there is an extra parenthesis.

Line 365mg kg-1, which

Line 309-326. Use present tense instead of past tense.

Author Response

Please see the attached file.

Best regards, Andreja 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report (New Reviewer)

Dear authors,

Please see attachment file.

Best wishes.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attached file. Thank you very much for your valuable comments.

Best regards,

Andreja

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.


Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Page 10 Line 329:

Manganese concentration in analyzed samples ranged from 21.5 to 57.5 mg/kg which is much lower compared to the average limestone (700mg/kg)

 

 

Author Response

Please find the response in the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

See attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Please find the response in the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript a study of the chemical composition and isotopic composition of O, C in a recent laminated tufa developed around a wooden pillar on the banks of Plitvice Lakes from 1979 to 2003. This can be important to find a possible anthropogenic contribution of potentially toxic elements.

The article looks very interesting. It is a pity that the study was only carried out on a sample.

The manuscript. Some grammatical corrections are necessary and other moderate changes needed.

 

I suggest some other minor changes:

Line 34: formed by physical and bioinduced precipitation “  by??

Line 40: “  Tufa de-posited in layers can be used as archive of fast changes”. Complete this sentence “fast changes of….”

Line 89: this is not the correct place for references [48, 49]. In addition reference [48] is highly incomplete ???

Line 89: (i) to observe.. it is not an observatikon perphas it is better to use the term: “to determine”.

Figure 1. Could you indicate the direction of the geoilogical profile on the geological map?

Figure 9. The Y-axis could be between 0 and 3. This would allow a better appreciation of the variations in metal content.

The quality of this figure must be improved.

 

Line 321-322: “The in crease in δ18O from Lake Prošćansko to Lake Kozjak sediments reflects increase in water  evaporation on downflow direction, i.e. from Lake Prošćansko to Lake Kozjak”. Other explanations could be possible, please read more about this issue.

 

Figure A1. Indicate on the diffractogram to which phase each of the most important peaks corresponds.

In conclusion, I believe that the conclusions, while appearing interesting, would be more robust if they were supported by a larger sample. Many of them are based on previous results.

Author Response

Please find the response in the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

See attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Back to TopTop