Next Article in Journal
Effects of Barrier Stiffness on Debris Flow Dynamic Impact—I: Laboratory Flume Test
Next Article in Special Issue
Revisiting Flood Hazard Assessment Practices under a Hybrid Stochastic Simulation Framework
Previous Article in Journal
Quantitative Analysis of Droplet Size Distribution in Plant Protection Spray Based on Machine Learning Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design and Field Implementation of a Low-Cost, Open-Hardware Platform for Hydrological Monitoring
Article

Free Global DEMs and Flood Modelling—A Comparison Analysis for the January 2015 Flooding Event in Mocuba City (Mozambique)

Department of Geodynamics, Stratigraphy, and Palaeontology, Faculty of Geology, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Academic Editor: Laurens M. Bouwer
Water 2022, 14(2), 176; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020176
Received: 22 November 2021 / Revised: 17 December 2021 / Accepted: 5 January 2022 / Published: 10 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Flood Hazard and Risk Science)
Flood hazard and risk analysis in developing countries is a difficult task due to the absence or scarce availability of flow data and digital elevation models (DEMs) with the necessary quality. Up to eight DEMs (ALOS Palsar, Aster GDEM, Bare Earth DEM, SRTM DEM, Merit DEM, TanDEM-X DEM, NASA DEM, and Copernicus DEM) of different data acquisition, spatial resolution, and data processing were used to reconstruct the January 2015 flood event. The systematic flow rate record from the Mocuba city gauge station as well as international aid organisms and field data were used to define both the return period peak flows in years for different flood frequencies (Tyear) and the January 2015 flooding event peak flow. Both visual and statistical analysis of flow depth values at control point locations give us a measure of the different hydraulic modelling performance. The results related to the Copernicus DEM, both in visual and statistical approach, show a clear improvement over the results of the other free global DEMs. Under the assumption that Copernicus DEM provides the best results, a flood hazard analysis was carried out, its results being in agreement with previous data of the effects of the January 2015 flooding event in the Mocuba District. All these results highlight the step forward that Copernicus DEM represents for flood hazard analysis in developing countries, along with the use of so-called “citizen science” in the form of flooding evidence field data acquisition. View Full-Text
Keywords: flood hazard; hydraulic modelling; global DEMs; Copernicus DEM; Mocuba city; Mozambique flood hazard; hydraulic modelling; global DEMs; Copernicus DEM; Mocuba city; Mozambique
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Garrote, J. Free Global DEMs and Flood Modelling—A Comparison Analysis for the January 2015 Flooding Event in Mocuba City (Mozambique). Water 2022, 14, 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020176

AMA Style

Garrote J. Free Global DEMs and Flood Modelling—A Comparison Analysis for the January 2015 Flooding Event in Mocuba City (Mozambique). Water. 2022; 14(2):176. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020176

Chicago/Turabian Style

Garrote, Julio. 2022. "Free Global DEMs and Flood Modelling—A Comparison Analysis for the January 2015 Flooding Event in Mocuba City (Mozambique)" Water 14, no. 2: 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020176

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop