1. Introduction
Erosion on slopes and margins of water bodies consists of separating and transporting sediment by water, wind, or gravity. This can be caused by the suppression of the existing vegetation, disturbances in the soil, and the creation of more steep surfaces, among other factors. Regarding water body margins, an additional factor to consider is the effect of waves, in which the forces generated by the impact of waves can exceed the resistance of the margin and vegetation, preventing them from becoming attached to the soil and promoting degradation of the environment [
1,
2].
According to Biedenharn et al. [
3], the margins of water bodies are naturally subjected to erosive processes and mass mobilization of sediments caused by the dynamic environment. The variables that have the most significant influence on the intensity of erosion are the topography, the origin and composition of the soil of the margin and the bed of water bodies, and the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the vegetation associated with the local hydraulic conditions (height of waves and wind speed) [
4]. On the other hand, other factors to consider are the hydrological and sediment connectivity of the margin, which indicates the paths followed in the transport of sediments and is mainly influenced by the relationship between the topography of the local and the intensity of the rains [
5], as well as the moisture changes in the topsoil layer, which is the layer more susceptible to erosion [
6].
The aim of any erosion control project must, therefore, be to stabilize soils and manage erosion economically [
7]. Choosing the control method is imperative for the success of erosion control operations. According to USACE (United States Army Corps of Engineers) [
8] and the USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) [
9], margin protection measures can be grouped into three categories: vegetative systems, rigid or semi-rigid elements, and mixed systems (or soil bioengineering), where these categories are often used together. There are other types of margin protection, such as projects that combine civil engineering with soft soil engineering procedures and revegetation (e.g., [
10]).
Due to interest in Hydroelectric Powerplants (HPPs) considering climate change, it is important to evaluate the operations and management of HPPs in combination with the impacts arising [
11], such as erosive processes. The problems of the erosion process are the main environmental impacts on the operation stage of most of the reservoirs of Brazilian HPPs, reflected in the loss of agricultural, urban, and forest areas, in water quality, in the abrasion of electromechanical equipment, and in the volume’s reduction and useful life of the reservoirs by silting. Brazil is the second greatest generator of hydroelectric power after China. Furthermore, it is one of the countries that builds the most dams in the world [
12]. Today, in Brazil, hydroelectricity represents 68.1% of the country’s electricity [
13].
Anthropic occupations (such as agriculture and tourism) in areas close to reservoir margins, often contradict Brazilian legislation in force, Law 12.651/2012 [
14], which stipulates the maintenance of a Permanent Preservation Area with a minimum strip of 30 m with riparian vegetation. This occupation promotes the exposure and weakening of the reservoir margins to erosive processes. This is exposure that, from the point of view of planning and management, creates a conflict in the margins’ use of space [
15]. The occurrence of severe problems verified by erosion caused by waves and erosion in temporary and permanent channels shows the need for further studies on erosion control techniques for the Brazilian reality.
Geosynthetic materials such as geotextiles and geogrids have been used in different erosion control techniques, for example, in hybrid gabion structures [
16], applications where the geotextile was used to wrap the aggregate inside the gabion box, and the geogrid as a reinforcement element at the intersection of the gabions. When installing erosion control techniques, geotextiles are commonly used, mainly in the separation and drainage function. Depending on the application, woven and nonwoven geotextiles can be installed on or inside the ground [
17]. Despite the benefits of using geosynthetics in erosion control works, the long-term environmental impacts caused by using it should be considered [
18]. It can be observed that the main raw material of geosynthetics comes from non-degradable materials such as thermoplastic polymers, whose degradation is triggered by several environmental influences, which can lead to an accumulation of microplastic particles, causing adverse effects in the surrounding area [
17,
18,
19].
This paper aims to contribute to the study of erosion control techniques applied to reservoir margins, highlighting the importance of monitoring the techniques during the service life and using suitable materials with proven durability. This study presents the implementation of semi-rigid erosion control techniques (gabion, gabion mattress, and geogrid mattress) on the reservoir margins of two Brazilian UHE: Porto Colômbia and Volta Grande. The performance of each technique installed in the different monitored sections was evaluated qualitatively considering different variables: the stream-bank integrity against erosion; vegetative cover growth, structural integrity, need for maintenance, aesthetics and landscape integration, and the regrowth of native vegetation. Differential bathymetry also evaluated the erosion control technique’s performance, based on two bathymetric measurements of the reservoir margins in 2016 and 2020. The degradation of the geotextiles used in the installation of erosion control techniques was also tested using thermo-analytical techniques.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
The Porto Colômbia and Volta Grande Hydroelectric Power Plants (HPPs) are located in the hydrographic basin of the Rio Grande, sub-basin of the Paraná River, located on the border of the States of São Paulo and Minas Gerais. The commercial operation of the HPPs began in 1973 and 1974, respectively. Since then, the typical characteristics of the region’s soil, associated with a predominantly flat relief, have enhanced agricultural activities, especially the cultivation of sugar cane [
20], as well as tourism and leisure activities [
21]. This type of activities carried out in regions close to the banks of the reservoirs benefits erosive processes.
The Porto Colômbia HPP has a dam with a 320 MW power generation capacity, which forms a 143 km
2 reservoir with a useful storage volume of 2.355 billion m³ of water. The Volta Grande HPP has a dam with a capacity of 380 MW, which forms a 220 km
2 reservoir with a useful storage volume of 7 million m³ of water. The two reservoirs that are the object of this study are reservoirs classified as run-of-river, that is, they generate energy with the flow of the river itself, without water storage as in accumulation reservoirs [
22]. Due to this characteristic, the volume of water stored can vary significantly from month to month.
An experimental unit was installed in each HPP for the application of different erosion control techniques on the reservoir banks at the end of 2016 (
Figure 1). The study areas were selected after field surveys carried out by river transport in June/July 2016. These experimental units were installed in areas with erosive features of margin undermining, as seen in
Figure 2, and zones with a greater probability of incidence of waves from the reservoirs, verified in the effective Fetch analyses performed for each reservoir. The maximum wind fetch analysis is used to calculate the potential height of wind waves in the reservoir that may affect the dam or its margins. Fetch analyses were performed according to Marques et al. [
23].
The climate of the study areas is classified as Cwa, with dry winters and hot summers, according to the Koppen climate classification [
24]. With a dry season from April to September and 80% of the rainy season lasting from October to March [
25]. According to data provided by the Brazilian National Meteorological Institute (INMET) of the nearest meteorological station to the experimental units (in the municipality of Conceição das Alagoas with coordinates: 19°59′7.31′′ S, 48° 9′3.36′′ W) at 36.7 km from the experimental unit Porto Colômbia and 18.2 km from the experimental unit Volta Grande, the mean annual region temperature is 23.5 °C, with temperatures ranging between 16.4 °C and 38.6 °C. The annual precipitation for the study area is around 1011 mm.
Table 1 summarizes characterization and soil strength test results for the experimental units in each HPP, performed based on the Brazilian Standard (NBR). According to the Unified Soil Classification System [
26], the soil of the two experimental units is sandy silt (ML).
2.2. Experimental Sections with Techniques of Erosion Control
This study assessed two different erosion control techniques, gabion and gabion mattress, using them as a mixed technique and geogrid (or geosynthetic) mattress. The latter has the same concept as traditional gabions and gabion mattresses but are manufactured in high-strength geogrids instead of metal meshes. The experimental units were divided into sections, where several erosion control techniques were implemented, and the sections where the techniques addressed in this work are identified in
Figure 3 and described in
Table 2. Sections with a height between 1.5 and 2 m and an approximate area of 150 m
2 were selected to evaluate the techniques. They are schematized in the profile shown in
Figure 4.
2.3. Geotextiles Used in the Erosion Control Techniques
The traditional gabion, gabion mattress, and geogrid mattress systems were installed in a previously prepared subgrade. This subgrade must be lined with a geotextile material [
31] that guarantees the separation between the soil particles and reinforcement structure, a prevents the transportation of soil particles inside the rock systems, thus improving the erosion control of the reservoir margin. Exhumed samples of nonwoven polypropylene geotextile were collected in each section to assess their degradation after monitoring the techniques in February 2020. Samples from the unexposed geotextile zone (
Figure 4) were collected in all the sections. Concerning the exposed zone, only samples from sections VG1 and VG2 were collected due to the difficulty of collecting the samples from these zones, which are in direct contact with the reservoir water. In this study, the word “Unexposed” relates to samples that were not in contact with the reservoir water; however, these samples were in contact with other environmental factors (soil, radiation, temperature, humidity, rain, etc.) The average values of the physical and mechanical characteristics of the exhumed samples are shown in
Table 3. Images of the general installation procedures of the techniques are available in
Appendix A.
The physical characteristics (mass per unit area and thickness) and mechanical characteristic (tensile strength) tests presented in
Table 3 were carried out in the Geosynthetic Laboratory at the University of São Paulo (USP) in São Carlos, Brazil. There is a difference between all the exhumed samples. When analyzing the properties of the geotextiles, it can be observed that the geotextiles used in the experimental unit PC were the ones that presented the highest values in the different characteristics presented. It shows the use of different geotextile materials in the control techniques of erosion implanted in the two experimental units.
2.4. Performance Evaluation of the Techniques
The sections started to be monitored in 2016 after completing the works to implement the techniques. Monitoring occurred periodically, with monthly visits up to 2020. The performance of the techniques was analyzed qualitatively, adopting the performance matrix used by Galvão et al. [
25]. The variables shown in
Table 4 were considered where each variable has a weight (from 0 to 3). The treatment that presented an optimal performance would consequently have a total weight of 18 points.
An initial bathymetry study was also carried out in each experimental unit after applying the techniques (in 2016) and at the end of monitoring (in 2020) to analyze the differential bathymetry. Two bathymetric profiles spaced 5 m apart were obtained in each section: one at the beginning of the section (profile 1) and one at the end of the section (profile 2). The topobatimetric survey services were performed following the regulations of ANA (Brazilian National Water Agency), ANEEL (Brazilian Electricity Regulatory Agency) and the Law 12.334/2010 [
35]. The activities involved were: (i) Geo-referenced Planialtimetric Survey Topobatimetry, (ii) Recognition of the area, (iii) Geo-referenced demarcation, (iv) Altimetric determination, (v) Preliminary design of the project, and (vi) Topobatimetric survey in the margin areas and topographic survey in the slope protection areas. Longitudinal and transversal surveys were carried out at the reservoir margins and in the areas where the techniques were implemented using the RTK (Real Time Kinematic) system for comparison and evaluation purposes.
For the planialtimetry of the margin areas, the following was used: Total Station, RTK, Topographic level, DGPS (Differential GPS), Topographic GPS, motorized vessel, generator, ultrasonic measuring tape; ballast (20 kg), graduated rods, laptop, voltage transformers, GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) RTK system, communication system (radio), Portable GPS, photographic equipment, support and transport vehicles (4X4 pickup), and other tools.
2.5. Geotextile Degradation Evaluation
In order to assess the degradation of the exhumed geotextile samples (
Table 3), thermal analyses were performed, which comprised thermogravimetry (TG), and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) analyses.
The evaluations performed by TG and DSC analyses aimed to evaluate the conditions of the samples under the action of temperature (thermal stability) comparing each one to verify the differences between them. The DSC curves enabled us to test the glass transition temperatures (Tg) and crystallization (Tcryst.), as well as the melting point of each sample. The TG curves made it possible to test the effects of nitrogen purge gases and synthetic air, which enabled us to compare the thermal decomposition of the samples.
The thermogravimetry (TG/DTG) was performed using an SDT 2960 (TA Instruments, USA) with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under nitrogen and synthetic air purge gases, with a flow of 100 mL min−1. These polymers were evaluated in an α-alumina crucible in a temperature range of 30 to 600 °C.
DSC curves were used to measure the changes in both materials. The measurements were conducted using a DSC Q20 model (TA Instruments, USA) with sample masses around 5 mg. These samples were performed in an aluminum crucible in the temperature range of 25 to 300 °C. The first step was to heat them from 25 °C to 300 °C. Then in the second step, the samples were cooled from 300 °C to 25 °C. In the last scan, the samples were heated again starting from 25 °C to 300 °C. The heating and cooling rates were 10 °C min−1 under nitrogen purge gas (flow of 50 mL min−1).
4. Conclusions
Several factors can affect the performance of an erosion control technique. The present study evaluated these macro-structurally factors through a qualitative analysis resulting from monitoring different variables and the bathymetric difference of the study sections, as well as microstructurally through thermal analysis that showed the degradation of a component (the geotextile) of the semi-rigid techniques implemented on the reservoir margins.
The performance matrix and differential bathymetry showed that the sections in the Porto Colômbia experimental unit where the mixed technique of gabion with mattress gabion was applied were the ones that presented the best performance among the compared sections. It can be highlighted that the mixed technique of a gabion and gabion mattress had a better performance compared to the geogrid mattress technique. This behavior may be linked to the rigidity of the material used to manufacture the boxes that contain the aggregate, which in traditional gabions is in metallic mesh, a material with fewer deformations compared to geogrids.
Commercial geotextiles were tested by DSC and TG/DTG analyses. TG/DTG analyses showed the thermal behavior under purge gas conditions, which allowed us to consider that the behavior of these materials up to a temperature of around 200 °C has the same thermal behavior, which shows that they do not change when submitted to heating. Naturally, the degradation behavior is different, considering that they are oxidizing and inert gases. Besides, the DSC curves showed that the exposed and unexposed samples behave similarly, with little change between them. However, the results of the exposed samples show a tendency of detachment and the appearance of new reactions during the fusion process, which shows that this sample is changing the molecular structure. The effect caused in the long term in geotextile samples is the constant decrease of crystallization, which leads to brittle materials and makes them unsuitable for use.
The work showed the importance of monitoring erosion control techniques to estimate their performance and the durability of the materials used.