In turn, I use this Huaylas case-study as a proxy for how technologically savvy groups can harness hydrological resources to provide resilience and water security under climate stress. Taking this comparison further, we advocate that Huaylas, and late Inca, landscape transformation and integrated approach to water management during the Prehispanic Period provides a potential model towards a modern best-practice use of available water resources, especially in a time of renewed hydraulic demand and deteriorating climatic conditions.
1.1. Climate and Community during the LATE Intermediate Period
The Middle Horizon (AD 600–1000), the period immediately prior to the Late Intermediate Period (AD 1000–1400), in the highlands was characterized by a long cycle of higher than average precipitation [
11] and with it a concomitant cultural effervescence seen in the emergence of large consolidated cultural entities, such as the Central Andean Tiwanaku [
31] and Wari polities [
32]. These subsequently collapsed during the eleventh and twelfth century ushering in a period of balkanized highland communities [
7].
While interpretations based around deteriorating climatic conditions are fraught with difficulties [
33], nevertheless, climate post-AD 1000 took a definite turn for the worst. A recently published article shows that drought conditions in the Southern Andean highlands commenced in the mid-tenth century with arid condition extending into the thirteenth century [
34], see also [
35,
36] for pertinent revisions of Arnold et al.’s article. It is during the Late Intermediate Period that we have the start of the warmer Medieval Climate Anomaly (MCA) dated at between ~1050 and ~1300 AD followed by a highly unstable phase leading to the onset of the Little Ice Age (LIA) ~1400 AD [
37,
38].
Variations on this theme see the LIA starting somewhat later at ~1500 A.D., although this is based solely on the Quellcaya data whose results are skewed by the Amazon Basin signal [
39]. Nevertheless, the various authors coincide that there is a warmer, drier period during the early LIP followed by a long period of unsettled climatic conditions before the advent of colder, wetter conditions towards the end of the LIP [
11,
40]. These broad conclusions are also lent support by proxy data from sedimentary δ18Ocal levels taken at Laguna Pumacocha located in the eastern Central Andes, which suggests that the period between AD 900–1100, during the MCA, was particularly arid, whilst the late phase between AD 1400–1820, during the LIA, was very wet [
41].
Therefore, the paleo-environmental evidence would suggest that, although the agricultural frontier might have benefitted from the warmer conditions prevalent during the eleventh to early fourteenth century, the increased aridity would likely have necessitated a greater investment in water procurement technology. In turn, this might have been a prime motivator behind increased terrace construction during and after the Middle Horizon [
42] as well as potentially, investments in wetland management [
43].
It is possible that rural communities at this stage gravitated around the use of an Andean highland resource suite involving maize (and potatoes) combined with domesticated camelid exploitation concentrated on the intermediate
kichwa/
suni (2300–4100 m) ecozones [
44]. While it is likely that this agropastoralist economic package had a long pedigree [
45], the increasingly specialized agropastoralism enhanced through recourse to hydraulic engineering was most likely a late Middle Horizon and Early Intermediate Period innovation.
The unsettled climatic conditions that pervaded throughout most of the Late Intermediate Period might have favored an increase in pastoralism given the mobile nature and environmental threshold tolerance of camelid vis-à-vis individual plant species. Likewise, this possibly led to increasing herder predominance within these bimodal, segmentary agropastoralist communities, e.g., [
46,
47].
Needless to say, segmentary social organization is very prevalent in herder-dominated societies both in the Andes and elsewhere [
48,
49], lending support to the idea that Late Intermediate Period segmentary organization may well have had its roots in the increasing importance of herding and herder society during this period [
50]. Similarly, scholars have noted the segmentary organization prevalent in community anarchism as a potential viable model for understanding past Andean kin-group and village organization [
51]. This type of organization has also been described as ‘ordered anarchy’ [
52] and describes an acephalous political structure without clearly defined leaders or rulers.
In this regard, the Cordillera Negra Huaylas population of the Late Intermediate Period combined a remarkable number of hydrological technologies, which included dams, reservoirs, canals, and irrigated terraces with a patent lack of internal socio-political hierarchy. Ethnohistoric evidence [
53,
54] for Huaylas hierarchical social organization is likely a reflection of later social changes under Inca and Spanish hegemony, rather than the state of affairs during much of the Late Intermediate Period. Instead of institutionalized elites for the Huaylas we have a much more fluid situation in which few chiefs are born into power, rather there was a favoring of transient leadership with political power vested in the existing corporate lineage groups otherwise known as the
ayllu.
Indeed, two types of authority seem to have existed throughout the Andean highlands, and among the Huaylas, at this time; authority-in-death by which important personages in life, once dead became venerated kin known as
mallqui [
55] with influence over day-to-day actions, and that of religio-technical authorities, such as water adjudicators, otherwise known as
cilquiua [
56] or water
camayuc or
cochacamayuc [
57]. Similar to the modern
varayoc or
alcalde de agua (water mayor) [
58,
59,
60,
61], these individuals or specialized groups were responsible for the equitable distribution of water, as well as maintenance of the existing hydrological infrastructure through recourse to community
faenas or labor, known generically as the
minka, which included terrace upkeep, the dredging of reservoirs, and canal cleaning among others [
24].
For the Late Intermediate Period, it was usually the herders within these agropastoralist communities who exercised the greater political control, and potentially control over water resources [
62,
63]. This pre-eminence of herder groups is well documented for the area of the central Andes 47, where subservient lower
yunga (500–2300 m) populations were inducted into repairing the high-altitude dams controlled by the agro-pastoralist
kichwa/
suni (2300–4100) and
puna (4100–4800) dwellers. As such, these agro-pastoralists were followers or ‘sons’ of the Andean thunder-God, purveyor of water, fertility, and animals.
Consequently, irrigation water for use in farming by lower-lying agriculturalists was often dependent upon alliances and bargaining with the herder component of these unequal, moiety-organized agro-pastoralist societies. In the study area, crucial water storage infrastructure, including dams and anthropogenically altered wetlands, were located within the herding specialized uplands. Furthermore, extant evidence shows that within these Late Intermediate Period landscapes, herder economies where not just restricted to the
puna ecozone but vied, depending on climate, environmental and landscape conditions, with agriculture to extend the pastoralist boundary altitudinally downwards to cover a large chunk of the agricultural
suni (3500–4100) ecozone, this served to increase the available pasturage in certain areas by as much as 50% [
64].
1.2. Survey and the Study Area
The research area lies between 89°77′ to 90°04′ North and 171°70′ to 171°81′ within the Cordillera Negra, in the Ancash Province of Peru (
Figure 1). Here, the Cordillera Negra mountain-range reaches a maximum height of
c. 5200 m. More specifically, the research area encompasses part of the northern section of the Cordillera Negra bounded by the Chaclancayo River in the south and the Uchpacancha River to the north, comprising the Pamparomás watershed, centered on the eponymous town.
The eastern peaks of the Cordillera Negra divide this area from the north–south running intermontane Santa Valley, forming the eastern boundary of our study region. Towards the west the limit of the area of research is set at 2300 m, the altitudinal division between the yunga and kichwa eco-zones. Downstream, both these highland rivers join the Colcap and Loco rivers to form the coastal Nepeña River down to the Pacific.
Geologically the upper Cordillera Negra is composed of Tertiary Volcanic Calipuy formations interspersed with pockets of earlier Cretacian geology, such as the Inca, Chulec, and Pariahuanca/Pariatambo formations; these are mainly solid Andesite conglomerates that are known for their hard though brittle nature (
Figure 2). The predominance of Andesite in this cordillera makes for a rock-type with low permeability averaging 10–20 m [
2,
65], which permits the formation of substantial natural water basins or lakes; the fracturing of the brittle Andesite in turn generates a higher degree of permeability through crack porosity of the rock. Fresh Andesite has an 8% porosity, while weathered Andesite has porosity between 10–20% [
66].
Andesite porosity reinforces geological water storage through the replenishment of underground aquifers that then feed into puquios or natural springs. The presence of a large area of igneous granite around the modern town of Pamparomás, on the lower limit of the survey area along the Chaclancayo River, provides an important quarrying source for stone construction material, especially for the dams and other hydrological features found in the area. Seismically, it is an area of considerable activity as can be evidenced by the numerous fault-lines throughout these still-young fold mountains. This is a key factor in the creation of fissures and the weathering of the underlying Andesite rock of this region.
This region of the Cordillera Negra also represents the intersection between two major recognized eco-zones: the
páramo and
puna. The
Páramo is a cold and humid landscape scarred by ancient glacial action; the average temperatures gravitate around 12 °C with extreme shifts between −23 °C and 23 °C. The often-water-logged soils are acidic (pH 3.7–5.5) and composed of humic black to dark brown earth. As the elevation increases, rock and sand proportions increase leading to a general decrease in water retention. Low atmospheric pressure, intense ultra-violet radiation, extremes of heat loss and accumulation lead to the endemic plant suites whose growth is slow and with low productivity. If severely disrupted, this ecosystem can take a long time to recover [
68].
Similarly, the
puna, is traditionally described as a harsh, usually dry Alpine meadow tundra located above the treeline; its soils are also highly humic, although with restricted sedimentation [
69]. Our area is on the boundary of the
puna type identified as humid [
70]. The humid
puna has daily temperature fluctuations between 25 and −20 °C; ground frost occurs some 300 days a year. The upper
puna or
puna brava has less sedimentation and is increasingly rugged, cold, and harsh. Traditionally thought of as a setting for a predominantly herding economy, the humid
puna nevertheless has a long tradition of agricultural cultivation, usually of bitter potatoes
(Solanum x juzepczukii and
Solanum x curtilobum) [
71].
Both the
páramo and
puna are what have been described as alpine type ecozones where it is, ‘summer every day and winter every night’ [
72]. In the case of the Cordillera Negra, precipitation averages a yearly 500 mm, which is sufficient for rainfed agriculture and for the replenishment of existing
páramo/
puna wetlands. Nevertheless, the main problem in the Cordillera Negra is, and has always been, the lack of a reliable water supply throughout the year [
73]. This means that, if unimpeded, the seasonal rains flow swiftly downslope to the sea. Natural lakes and springs, whilst common to the area [
67,
74], are not normally very large and are insufficient for local needs.
Prehispanic people appear to have tackled this longstanding problem through the construction of a series of dams and reservoirs that spanned side-valleys and ravines possibly as part of an integrated management of water resources that stretched across whole tributaries and covered the Andean highland section of drainages.
Viewed as whole-of-tributary systems, they potentially significantly increased the water-holding capacity of the affected areas and, in turn, held back a large proportion of the rich highland sediments that would otherwise have been eroded downwards to the coast. Furthermore, scholars have been at pains to highlight the importance that herding and subsequently the
puna and
páramo ecozones had in the past, with some stating that the herding economy was at least equal to, or greater, than that of agriculture [
75].
1.3. Hydraulic Infrastructure and Watershed Management
Elsewhere, I have described how it is useful to think of water technology in the Andes in terms of ‘dry’ or ‘wet’; in which ‘dry’ designates those in which water flows intermittently, for instance terraces, and ‘wet’ are those features in which water is almost always present, such as dams [
3]. The same article provides dense descriptions of the main different types of hydrological features found in the Andes. For our purposes here, I will summarize the main features of the technologies pertinent to our study area (
Table 1).
A crucial aspect of these hydrological features is that they are not present in isolation, rather they are found as packages across the Cordillera Negra, likely creating an interlaced system that links water management strategies from the herding-intense puna down through the mixed herding-farming suni and subsequently to the predominantly agricultural kichwa. In end-effect we appear to have a seamless system of water management linking these agro-pastoralist communities across the gradient of the Cordillera Negra. Nevertheless, this seamlessness is possibly the result of centuries of technological accumulation across watersheds.
Within our study area, I surveyed a total of over 100 archaeological sites, including settlements, tombs, and sacred standing stones. Within this total, there are 21 specific hydrological features and areas (
Figure 3). These hydrological features and groups of features were the lynchpin towards harnessing the regions scarce water resources leading to greater economic productivity. A cursory appraisal of the survey data on
Figure 3 suffices to show the potentially integrated nature of hydrological technology found in the Pamparomás watershed.
The Pamparomás watershed is essentially fed by two large rivers the southern Chaclancayo and the northern Uchpacancha. These two water sources are mentioned in an important local historical document pertaining to a long-running court case over land and water rights between Dominican monks and the local community dating to the end of the 18th and beginning of the 19th century [
76]. Here, the Uchpacancha River is known as ‘Río Grande’ or big river, with three other rivers, including the Chaclancayo and its three main tributaries, making up the main water sources for the Pamparomás watershed area (
Figure 4 &
Table 2).
Extrapolating from the modern map of the area (
Figure 3) I can identify the other two smaller rivers in the 1803 map as the modern Sisuran and Collapampa rivers. In toto, these four collect their waters from natural lakes or anthropogenic dams located in the high-altitude
puna/
páramo headwater zone directly in respect to the Uchpacancha, Sisuran, and Collapampa rivers or indirectly, as in the case of the Chanclancayo, which gathers it from three smaller tributaries—the Chorillos, Rico, and Colpa.
In fact, the hydraulic system in the study area can be divided into two large blocks, with the Sisuran and Collapampa feeding into the larger Uchpacancha drainage constituting one of these and the Chaclancayo and its tributaries the other. In this respect, the Uchpacancha includes ten water and three silt dams, while the Chaclancayo has four and two, respectively. The large number of water reservoirs positioned above the circum-Pamparomás basin would have sustained the kichwa and suni ecozone agriculture of this area. Nevertheless, the more undulating Chaclancayo drainage also includes the huge Collpacocha silt dam [Co 1], as well as large areas of silt reservoirs making it a particularly productive pastoralist landscape.
Throughout the system, other smaller streams and springs feed into all these rivers, but these constitute the hydrological mainstay of the watershed and, thereby, the areas in which past populations built their hydrological infrastructure. In some instances, these waters fed directly onto terrace systems, and three large areas of abandoned or relict terraces have been identified. It is probable that there were others, but they were most likely dismantled by sub-modern and modern cultivation.
Terrace agriculture is no longer practiced in the area; yet, in the past, these terrace systems were very well integrated into the larger water management system of the area. In this regard, water from the Chorrillos side-valley located in the Chaclancayo drainage, especially from the huge Yanacocha water dam [Cho 1] was diverted by means of an irrigation canal to the Pukio terraces located above the modern town of Pamparomás
Figure 5.
The crucial point to understand about the construction of this hydraulic infrastructure is the likely interconnectedness of the different features through time. Essentially, beginning in the late Middle Horizon (AD 600–1000) and Late Intermediate Period (AD 1000–1400), the local populations invested heavily in hydraulic engineering to offset increased water insecurity.
It is probable that, through a long process of accretion, these local Huaylas generated an integrated system of water, silt and land management that stretched from the top of the cordillera down to the confluence of the Uchpacancha and Chaclancayo rivers at the site of Tincu near the village of Ullpán (c. 1400 m), thereby, combining herding and farming across this whole altitudinal range. Even so, significant local tributary differences existed. In this regard, altitude is a key determinant in how the hydraulic system of this valley were constituted such that the four main types of ‘wet’ hydrological features invariably occurred in a particular order:
water dams,
silt dams,
silt reservoirs, and
water reservoirs.
These structures also share a common constructive technique given that they are built of granite blocks on the outside along both faces, while the area between the wall is infilled with a compacted coarse gravel and soil/clay admixture (
Figure 6). The stone used in the construction of these features are usually rough-cut, although two, Collpacocha [Co 1] and Yanacocha Hembra [Rac 6], have better cut stone in their construction, perhaps suggesting a later construction date, possibly linked to the Inca expansion into the area.
For instance, Collpacocha [Co 1] is located alongside a small Inca administrative site [
77]. This construction technique lends the structures robustness and durability, but importantly not fixed rigidity, allowing the structures to resist seismic movement, a common occurrence in this part of the Andes. By way of comparison, modern micro-dams in the area are built using steel rods and cement creating rigid structures, which are all too susceptible to fracture during seismic events [
78].
1.3.1. Water Dams
On an individual basis, all these structures are found at different altitudinal heights, with water dams located above 4150 m, within the puna/paramo ecozone. At this altitude, there is little sedimentation from the surrounding geology. Even today, the dammed lakes have little accumulated sediment. It is also likely that the dams were built to augment already pre-existing glacial lakes located within Andesite rock basins. Of all the lakes identified in the study region only one, Itchicocha, was natural providing an example of how these lakes looked like before human intevention. These Prehispanic structures are gravity dams, which use their weight and bulk to provide the wherewithal to hold back water, as such they are roughly triangular with a broader base and narrower crest, mimicking the triangular nature of water pressure.
Water pressure is proportionally greater at the base of a dam, whilst that at the top it is negligible. Normally, the base of modern gravity dams is equal to, or greater than, 0.7-times the height of the dam. Ancient dams typically exceeded this ratio, as seen in all the dams within the study area. Constructively, the gravity dams usually anchor or seal at least one, and where possible both, of their walls onto the natural rock outcrops that exist in this rugged landscape. This is a simple way of giving greater stability and strength to the structure.
The water dams in the study area usually have a varying number of sluice outtakes (known locally as desfogues), whilst a few of the dams have a single sluice located at the base of the structure allowing for a single on-off unregulated flow, likely through the use of a stone-plug. It is possible that the base-level sluice was also used to rid the basin of excess sediment, although it is likewise likely that this would not have been all that effective leading to gradual sedimentation of these structures, especially the lower-lying silt dams (see below).
Some of the more complex structures, such as Yanacocha Hembra [Rac 6], have two sluices, one at the base and one at the crest of the wall, while other examples, such as Ricococha Baja [Ra 1A], have up to six sluices (
Figure 7 and
Figure 8), allowing for a greater regulation of water flow from the dam, this is similar to the Prehispanic Yanascocha dam registered in the Central Andes by Frank Salomon [
17], reiterating that these type of constructions were likely ubiquitous across large stretches of the Andes, especially along the drier Pacific-facing cordilleras.
1.3.2. Silt Dams
Ethnohistoric evidence shows that, during the Prehispanic period, there was anthropogenic wetland or
bodedal management [
56]. This has been validated both archaeologically, e.g., [
14], and anthropologically, e.g., [
79]. In principle, the basic concept behind this is that, through wetland management and enlargement, large areas of the
puna can be turned into a rich plant biota for camelids, especially the more delicate and softer plant-eating alpaca (
Lama pacos) [
80].
The difference is striking, while a Ha. of normal
puna pasture is adequate for between 1 and 2.25 animals [
81], a Ha. of
bofedal is sufficient for 3.25 animals [
82]. In the study area, I have two main types of
bofedal or wetland creation: silt dams and silt reservoirs. Both are integral elements to the Prehispanic agropastoralist economies of the area.
In this regard, silt dams bear striking similarities to normal water dams in that they are roughly the same size, constructed of double-faced walls, in-filled with compacted earth, gravel and clay, making an impermeable barrier behind which sediment and water are stored, sometimes they are also anchored or sealed onto natural rock outcrops, although this is not always the case (
Figure 9 and
Figure 10). The central section of most of the dams is further reinforced by step-like walling, most likely because of the added pressure present in this segment of the structure.
The main difference with water dams is the altitude at which these structures appear, between 3800 and 4450 m. With the sole exception of the small silt dam at Tsaquicocha [Pa 5], located at 4625 m, all the other silt dams are altitudinally lower than their water cousins and in three cases, Tsaquicocha [Uc 3] on the Uchpacancha River, Oleron Cocharuri [Cho 2], and Huancacocha [Rac 1] on the Sisuran River, they are located directly below important water dams, respectively, Negrahuacanan [Uc 2], Yanacocha [Cho 1], and Sacracocha [Rac 2], as part and parcel of an integrated water and soil management system.
Nevertheless, it is also possible that these structures represented an earlier construction phase of water dams at a lower altitude, and it was only after they had sedimented over, effectively becoming silt dams, that this new role was then envisaged for them. Only further research, especially the dating of the lake sediments, e.g., by isotope ratios or pollen, will resolve this issue. That said, it is likely that the construction of these silt dams, whether intentional or not would have been preceded by a period when the area behind the dam wall would have contained an ever-decreasing water basin. This is evident from the soil-sampling data from Collpacocha (Co 1, see below).
Although these features in the area have been interpreted as secondary erosion dams [
83] to counteract the effects of periodic landslides known as
huaicos, they had more than this one function. Silt dams, like the silt reservoirs that I will describe later, were more than simply features to stop erosion flooding; rather, the silt platforms that they created allowed better pasture to flourish while retaining rich deposits of mineral salts that could also animals ingest through soil-munching. This underscores one of the reasons why silt dams were located altitudinally in areas where sedimentation naturally occurred.
Other differences with water dams existed, for instance, silt dams are not necessarily anchored onto rock outcrops, and they usually have only one discernible outtake sluice located along the base of the structure, usually at its centre. The basic principle governing the silt dam is that of geologic water storage [
84]; in this case, the accumulated soil basin acting as an aquifer in which water is stored, filtered and purified through the soil. Since the soil also acts as a barrier to water seepage, the sluice should be viewed rather as a ‘sieve’ drain that siphons excess water out of the basin, whilst the soil retains enough saturated moisture for the growth of
bofedal-type conditions for animals.
Silt dams were the result of a slow process of soil accretion or varve-formation [
85] through years of careful nurture. Therefore, it is highly probable that some of the larger silt dams retained a small spectrum of water until this was eventually silted over. This seems to have been the case with Collpacocha [Co 1] where soil auguring revealed that the area nearest the dam wall was a lake for a considerable period of time [
18]. Likewise, the overflowing conditions experienced today on many of these silt dams, such as Collpacocha [Co 1] and Huancacocha [Rac 1], are not indicative of the way they would have looked during the Prehispanic period.
It is likely that periodic partial de-silting of the structures occurred, with this excess mineral-rich silt possibly reused on nearby terraces and fields for use in agriculture. De-silting has been evidenced in similar structures, such as in the Indian
gabarband silt-traps [
86], providing a useful analogy for what might have happened in the Andes. Nor is the idea of soil removal a new one in Andean studies, it had already been documented ethnohistorically in the Sixteenth Century [
87] and has been suggested as a wide-ranging practice during the Prehispanic period and subsequently [
88].
In total, our study area evidences five silt dams: Oleron Cocharuri [Cho 2]; Collpacocha [Co 1]; Tsaquicocha [Pa 5]; Huancacocha [Rac 1]; and Tsaquicocha [Uc 3], covering an area totalling 372,027 m² of anthropogenically enhanced bofedal sufficient to maintain a herd of over 1000 animals for a year, although we also have to consider that these silt dams and their wetlands would likely only have been used at the end of the dry season (July–September) when these might have represented some of the last extant good pasturage before the highland rains.
1.3.3. Silt Reservoirs
Altitudinally below the silt dams, there are a series of irregular, accidented open areas or
pampas, especially on the Chorrillos and Rico side-valleys, within which, a series of small, horseshoe-shaped walls were built (
Figure 11). This elevation range is significant as, these reservoirs represent a natural progression from the slightly higher-placed silt dams, while also impinging into what has traditionally been viewed as agricultural land along the upper
suni range, but which, during the Late Intermediate Period (AD 1000–1450), seems to have been given over to herding [
64]. These features trap silt and water behind the wall, thus, creating small
bofedal-like wetlands.
I refer to these features as ‘silt reservoirs’, from the local Spanish term for them—
reservorios de limo. They occur below the silt dams and above the agricultural terraces and fields, between
c. 3900 and 4400 m, ranging between 7 and 20 m in length, with an average height that ranges between 0.6 and 2 m. These features are similar to erosion-controlling check terraces [
89], but are here used to generate small compact wetlands for pasture. They tend to be thicker at the centre of the wall, varying between 0.6 and 1.2 m, although some of the larger constructions reach widths of up to 1.6 m across the center. As with the water dams that they resemble, albeit not in scale, they have a drainage sluice along the central base of the structure, from which excess water seeps out.
Analogous to the other stone features reviewed here, these silt reservoirs are also built with a double-faced stone wall, in-filled with compacted rock and clay. They are set perpendicular to water flow, impeding its uninterrupted movement; this acts as a silt trap and as an erosion barrier to the annual hill-wash episodes and high energy highland discharges that periodically occur in these largely tree-denuded landscape. In turn, the entrapment of silt permits the creation of small bofedal micro-environments behind the walls.
Like the silt and water dams, these silt reservoirs utilise, where possible, the natural rock outcrops, although, as with silt dams, this is not always the case. In total, across the study area, the silt reservoirs cover an approximate area of 300,415 m², representing over 300 Ha. of bofedal. Together with the silt dams above, this totals in the region of c. 700 Ha. of improved pasture reiterating yet again the importance of these types of technology for the provision of pasture at a local level.
1.3.4. Water Reservoirs
Next, there are what Andean scholars have defined as water reservoirs, likely translating from
reservorio the Spanish for pond or tank, a small water catchment structure [
15,
88] similar in principle to the water dams but at a much-reduced scale. Reservoirs have been documented on the coast usually in close association with irrigation canals and the agricultural fields they feed into [
90]. Reservoirs in the highlands follow a similar pattern [
91], with the added take that these agricultural fields can also be terraces, such that reservoirs serve to regulate water into agricultural terrace systems. This close association between cultivated fields and reservoirs means that these features are normally located at a lower altitude, within the
kichwa and
suni ecozones.
In our study area, reservoirs appear between 2500 and 3800 m, hugging the limits of viable cultivation. These reservoirs come in a variety of shapes and sizes; round, ovular or roughly rectangular, contorting themselves to the available space, while varying between 10 to 15 m in relative diameter or length, with an average depth of between 1.5 and 3 m. Construction is of a rough coursed-stone internal wall and either a similar external wall or an earthen embankment (
Figure 12).
Reservoirs are fully enclosed structures so that walls bound the structure on all sides. In turn, a canal, either earthen or stone-walled, acts as a feeder channel, diverting water towards the reservoir. An outtake sluice is located at the bottom of the reservoir near to an outtake canal that channels the water from here to the irrigated fields.
As with all hydraulic structures, they are difficult to date, especially if they are found disassociated from datable archaeological sites. Nevertheless, the Prehispanic reservoir of Nununga [Cj 1] (
Figure 13) is closely associated to mortuary structures or
chullpas [Cj 2] with late Middle Horizon and Late Intermediate Period (AD 900–1400) material providing a potential
terminus ante quem for the construction and use of this reservoir. Likewise, in the Chorrillos side-valley, dating of ceramic material found in the adjacent settlements and tombs gives us a similar use date (late MH-LIP). In this side-valley, the water reservoirs are directly placed alongside the agricultural terrace systems of Llanapaccha [Cho 8], thereby, providing water to them.
1.3.5. Agricultural Terraces
Finally, below the silt terraces there are agricultural terraces. As previously mentioned, these are all now in disuse, but two major types exist in their abandoned state within the study area: sloping field terraces and bench terraces. In all cases, while overall cultivation land is lost through terrace construction, this is ameliorated by the deeper soil matrix created by their construction [
15]. Aside from this greater potential productivity, terraces also control erosion and humidity, creating a more sustainable micro-climate amenable to a greater variety of crops, such as maize [
75].
Sloping field terraces are the most common type of terracing found in the Andes, usually in side-valleys away from rivers or intermittent streams [
15]. Sloping field terraces are built along the natural slope with soil accumulation occurring behind a retainer wall. Although the cultivation zone itself is sloped, the terrace wall acts to level the slope through soil accumulation, allowing for the control of erosion, water run-off, and moisture retention. Sloping field terraces are usually partitioned into discrete parcels incorporating side walls; these can act as conveyors or deflectors of water flow.
These terraces are sometimes irrigated by overhead feeder canals, although the vast majority sustain themselves on the yearly rains, localized springs or slope seepage. These features are, therefore, not regimented into equidistant parallel strips but can occur haphazardly along a mountain flank. The vast majority of these terraces have been documented for areas above 3500 m. In the Central Andes, at this height, there is usually sufficient rainfall for at least one crop a year. In the study area, sloping field terraces have been found at the top of the Chaclancayo Valley around the Huaylas-Inca site of Intiaurán [Co 2] where the land opens up into a wide undulating expanse of suni-puna located between 3800 and 4300 m.
Nevertheless, the study area has larger expanses of abandoned bench terraces. Bench terraces convey a classic image of Andean highland agriculture in which close-fitting stone retaining walls, usually between 1 and 5 m in height, step upwards along the valley sides usually arranged in parallel vertical rows. The walls slope inward, presenting a level planting surface that is typically fed by some form of integrated canal irrigation system.
The terraces of Llanapaccha [Cho 8B], for instance, incorporated a system of main canals fed by catchment reservoirs built alongside the Chorrillos River, from where water was diverted to feed the terraces (
Figure 14). Internally, water from the three main canals, offset at the top, middle, and lower parts along the terraced slope would have cascaded downwards throughout the whole system.
Excavation at one of the bench terraces at Intiaurán [Co 2] revealed that the terrace had a base of small to large cobbles over which a richer humic soil level was present. The first level allowed for good drainage of the terrace, while the second provided the soil matrix necessary for successful agriculture. This is similar to what other researchers have documented across the Andes [
88], e.g., [
92,
93,
94]. Bench terracing is found at the lower end of the Chorrillos side-valley, where the Rico Valley joins the Chaclancayo and in a wide area above the modern town of Pamparomás, this last was fed by an important stone-lined canal that connected Chorrillos to the Pukio area (see above).
As can be seen, this area of the Cordillera Negra during, at least, the Late Intermediate Period (AD 1000–1400) and likely earlier, manifested a highly intricate management of water that straddled both herding and farming zones as part of integrated, complex agropastoralist Huaylas communities. Given that the Huaylas settled the Cordillera Negra from at least the Fortaleza River in the South to the Santa in the North, this water management system and the concomitant agropastoralist organisation unpinning it most likely extended itself across this whole mountain range.
Evidence from further north seems to bear this out [
21], and, while extensive research to the south is still lacking in this respect, preliminary unpublished surveys by research colleagues seem to show the same pattern emerging in the southern Aija Valley [
95].