Best Practices for Monitoring and Assessing the Ecological Response to River Restoration

Nature-based solutions are widely advocated for freshwater ecosystem conservation and restoration. As increasing amounts of river restoration are undertaken, the need to understand the ecological response to different measures and where measures are best applied becomes more pressing. It is essential that appraisal methods follow a sound scientific approach. Here, experienced restoration appraisal experts review current best practice and academic knowledge to make recommendations and provide guidance that will enable practitioners to gather and analyse meaningful data, using scientific rigor to appraise restoration success. What should be monitored depends on the river type and the type and scale of intervention. By understanding how habitats are likely to change we can anticipate what species, life stages, and communities are likely to be affected. Monitoring should therefore be integrated and include both environmental/habitat and biota assessments. A robust scientific approach to monitoring and appraisal is resource intensive. We recommend that appraisal efforts be directed to where they will provide the greatest evidence, including ‘flagship’ restoration schemes for detailed long-term monitoring. Such an approach will provide the evidence needed to understand which restoration measures work where and ensure that they can be applied with confidence elsewhere. View Full-Text

Keywords: river restoration; monitoring; appraisal; best practice; BACI

▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

England, J.; Angelopoulos, N.; Cooksley, S.; Dodd, J.; Gill, A.; Gilvear, D.; Johnson, M.; Naura, M.; O’Hare, M.; Tree, A.; Wheeldon, J.; Wilkes, M.A. Best Practices for Monitoring and Assessing the Ecological Response to River Restoration. Water 2021, 13, 3352. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13233352

AMA Style

England J, Angelopoulos N, Cooksley S, Dodd J, Gill A, Gilvear D, Johnson M, Naura M, O’Hare M, Tree A, Wheeldon J, Wilkes MA. Best Practices for Monitoring and Assessing the Ecological Response to River Restoration. Water. 2021; 13(23):3352. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13233352

Chicago/Turabian Style

England, Judy, Natalie Angelopoulos, Susan Cooksley, Jennifer Dodd, Andrew Gill, David Gilvear, Matthew Johnson, Marc Naura, Matthew O’Hare, Angus Tree, Jennifer Wheeldon, and Martin A. Wilkes. 2021. "Best Practices for Monitoring and Assessing the Ecological Response to River Restoration" Water 13, no. 23: 3352. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13233352

Find Other Styles

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Abstract views Pdf views Html views

Article Menu

Best Practices for Monitoring and Assessing the Ecological Response to River Restoration

Abstract

Share and Cite

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI