Peer-Review Record
Review on Emerging Waterborne Pathogens in Africa: The Case of Cryptosporidium
Water 2021, 13(21), 2966; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13212966
Reviewer 1:
Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Anonymous
Water 2021, 13(21), 2966; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13212966
Submission received: 11 September 2021
/
Revised: 9 October 2021
/
Accepted: 15 October 2021
/
Published: 21 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Water and One Health)
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The paper presents the results of a review on emerging waterborne pathogens in Africa and specifically on crysposporidium.
Generally the paper is well-written and presented.
Comments:
- the title should be rephrased as it is not clear
- the conclusions section should also include the main results of the study
Author Response
Dear ,
Please see the attachment
cordialment
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
- The author says that reference search is conducted on 1 June, 2020, today it is 18 Sep., 2021, nearly 15 months passed, why the author submit the paper so late? Also, how can the author keep the timeliness of the paper? Is there any efficient reports about the treatment of waterborne disease in this period (1 June, 2020 to 18 Sep., 2021)?
- Maybe not all the reports could be searched on the databases ScienceDirect, PubMed, Scopus, 100 SpringerLink, Taylor and Francis, Wiley, Intercedence, and Google scholar and Web of Science.
- The section of the methods may be deleted or just describe in short. There is no need to introduce the whole process about search.
Author Response
Dear,
Please see the attachment
Cordialment
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
The paper was revised according to the reviewers' comments, thus it was recommended for publication in its current version.
