Next Article in Journal
Study on the Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Mesoscale Drought in China under Future Climate Change Scenarios
Previous Article in Journal
A ConvLSTM Conjunction Model for Groundwater Level Forecasting in a Karst Aquifer Considering Connectivity Characteristics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Environmental Flow Releases for Wetland Biodiversity Conservation in the Amur River Basin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue: Environmental Flows, Ecological Quality, and Ecosystem Services

Department of Climate Change, Area of Sustainability, EURECAT, 43870 Amposta, Catalonia, Spain
Water 2021, 13(19), 2760; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192760
Submission received: 24 September 2021 / Accepted: 26 September 2021 / Published: 6 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Flows, Ecological Quality and Ecosystem Services)
Global environmental change is greatly disturbing rivers and estuaries by a number of stressors, among which water withdrawal, damming, pollution, invasive species, and climate change are the most worrying. All of them have a direct connection to river hydrology and preserving flow regimes has become one of the key issues for protecting our future water resources and river ecosystems. Thus, the science and methods to establish adequate environmental flows (e-flows) is a keystone to implement an integrated management of water resources. This is even more critical in water scarce river basins, where the preservations of ecological functions and values of aquatic ecosystems (i.e., water quality, sediment dynamics, productivity, biodiversity, carbon cycling, etc.) critically depend on river flow regime. However, scientists and managers often find it very difficult to quantitatively link the ecological status and biodiversity of aquatic ecosystems and their services to specific e-flow regimes. This Special Issue includes papers investigating the links between river flow regime, the status of aquatic ecosystems, and the benefits they provide to our society either from the science or management perspective.
The main group of papers focuses on the conceptual, quantitative, and qualitative links of flow regime and e-flows with river ecosystem functions and values, such as the preservation and ecological status of inland wetlands [1], the functions and values of temporarily closed estuaries [2], the preservation of fish species richness [3], the impact on fish spawning period [4], the ecological quality, bird diversity and shellfish fisheries in a lowland river and its coastal area [5], and the ecosystem productivity of coastal areas [6]. Moreover, one of the papers [7] performs an in-depth review of ecohydrological links in the lower Ebro River and its Delta, which is one of the most studied cases regarding the impacts of flow regime alteration on socioecological functions and values. Finally, a couple of papers deal with management and policy issues, such as Chinese policies of hydropower projects to avoid negative environmental impacts [8] and the proposal of a new framework for managing ecological quality and ecosystem services in coastal waters [9].
Most of the papers highlight the idea that, besides promising progress in establishing and implementing e-flows in rivers and coastal areas, efforts are not sufficient to preserve the ecological integrity and health of river ecosystems. On the other hand, the multidimensional character of e-flow research and management suggests that a holistic socio-ecological approach is needed to successfully establish, test, and implement sound-flow regimes under an adaptative framework.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nikitina, O.I.; Dubinina, V.G.; Bolgov, M.V.; Parilov, M.P.; Parilova, T.A. Environmental Flow Releases for Wetland Biodiversity Conservation in the Amur River Basin. Water 2020, 12, 2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Adams, J.B.; Van Niekerk, L. Ten Principles to Determine Environmental Flow Requirements for Temporarily Closed Estuaries. Water 2020, 12, 1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Driver, L.J.; Cartwright, J.M.; Knight, R.R.; Wolfe, W.J. Species-Richness Responses to Water-Withdrawal Scenarios and Minimum Flow Levels: Evaluating Presumptive Standards in the Tennessee and Cumberland River Basins. Water 2020, 12, 1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, J.; Qin, H.; Pei, S.; Yao, L.; Wen, W.; Yi, L.; Zhou, J.; Tang, L. Analysis of an Ecological Flow Regime during the Ctenopharyngodon Idella Spawning Period Based on Reservoir Operations. Water 2019, 11, 2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Belmar, O.; Ibáñez, C.; Forner, A.; Caiola, N. The Influence of Flow Regime on Ecological Quality, Bird Diversity, and Shellfish Fisheries in a Lowland Mediterranean River and Its Coastal Area. Water 2019, 11, 918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Cozzi, S.; Ibáñez, C.; Lazar, L.; Raimbault, P.; Giani, M. Flow Regime and Nutrient-Loading Trends from the Largest South European Watersheds: Implications for the Productivity of Mediterranean and Black Sea’s Coastal Areas. Water 2019, 11, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ibáñez, C.; Caiola, N.; Belmar, O. Environmental Flows in the Lower Ebro River and Delta: Current Status and Guidelines for a Holistic Approach. Water 2020, 12, 2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, M.; Chen, A.; Zhang, X.; McClain, M.E. A Comment on Chinese Policies to Avoid Negative Impacts on River Ecosystems by Hydropower Projects. Water 2020, 12, 869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Tagliapietra, D.; Povilanskas, R.; Razinkovas-Baziukas, A.; Taminskas, J. Emerald Growth: A New Framework Concept for Managing Ecological Quality and Ecosystem Services of Transitional Waters. Water 2020, 12, 894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ibáñez, C. Special Issue: Environmental Flows, Ecological Quality, and Ecosystem Services. Water 2021, 13, 2760. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192760

AMA Style

Ibáñez C. Special Issue: Environmental Flows, Ecological Quality, and Ecosystem Services. Water. 2021; 13(19):2760. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192760

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ibáñez, Carles. 2021. "Special Issue: Environmental Flows, Ecological Quality, and Ecosystem Services" Water 13, no. 19: 2760. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192760

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop